DOCSLIB.ORG

Srg Global Bridge Construction and Maintenance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE CIVIL CIVIL Bridge Construction and Maintenance SRG Global are leaders in building and maintaining complex bridge infrastructure around the world. From the early design stages through to construction of new bridges or maintenance and strengthening of existing bridges, SRG Global has the knowledge and expertise to deliver. Bridge Specialists Our expertise includes the most Incremental Launching SRG Global has been designing, effective and cost-efficient bridge constructing, repairing and solutions, from simply supported Cable Stay Systems strengthening bridges since the structures to incremental launching, 1960’s, becoming an acknowledged balanced cantilever, cable stays, and Matchcast Segmental leader in bridgeworks on an match-cast segmental construction Bridges international level. We have techniques. completed projects throughout We also strengthen existing bridges, Balanced Cantilever Australia, South East Asia, the Middle bringing innovative design solutions Construction East,the United Kingdom and Africa. in carbon fibre technology and As part of the BBR Global Network of post-tensioning. Our engineered Cast Insitu Post-Tensioning Experts, SRG Global utilises the most applications are suited to the full advanced technology available. spectrum of existing structures Structural Strengthening SRG are well equipped to undertake including timber, concrete and steel. projects wherever the location. Our Preserving vital infrastructure Bearing Replacement proven track record and experience in civil and industrial projects, as well Timber and concrete bridges exist Concrete Overlays and Joint as our focus on safety, quality and the in various shapes and forms. All of environment ensures SRG Global are them require maintenance, and the Maintenance the right people for the job. owners of these bridges are looking for cost effective means to maintain or Remedial Diagnosis and Optimising how complex bridge upgrade them. Investigation structures are constructed Bridge projects where challenging Some bridges require ongoing terrain, difficult access, long spans substructure maintenance, whilst or design constraints apply are others need deck and expansion joint our forte. We work out how to maintenance and enhancements. simplify the engineering, optimise Guardrail and safety upgrades are also construction methodology and apply common treatments. it to complete simply supported and structurally complex bridge structures. CIVIL Bridge Construction Incremental Launching Segmental Bridges Balanced Cantilever SRG Global are leaders in SRG Global has extensive experience Construction incremental launching of bridges, in the construction of segmental SRG Global undertakes balanced having completed projects all bridges. Matchcast segmental cantilever bridge construction which over the world. The incremental bridges are made from precast may be undertaken using cast in-situ launching method combines the concrete units which are stressed segments or alternatively involve advantages of precast segmental together with strand or bars. placing of precast segments. The construction with those of cast insitu There are two normal methods of scale and complexity of the project methods. construction including balanced will determine the optimum solution. cantilever and span-by-span simply SRG’s specialist teams using bespoke Cable Stay Systems supported method. equipment for insitu construction have constructed bridges with spans SRG Global provides strand, wire, Cast Insitu Post-Tensioning exceeding 150 metres. This widely bar or carbon stay cables for a used form of construction is both wide variety of structures, drawing SRG Global offers post-tensioning economical and well proven. on both local and global expertise services for bridge construction. and resources of the BBR Network. Besides the situation where precast SRG Global can provide strand elements are joined to adjacent (BBR HiAm ConaTM), wire (DinaTM segments by post-tensioning, / HiAmTM) or bar type stay cables construction may be undertaken for this specialist method of bridge with conventional cast in-situ construction which is especially methodology. Our range of fully suitable for medium to long span approved systems and specialist bridges from 100 metres to 1,000 solutions is able to provide an metres. optimal engineering and economical solution. CIVIL Bridge Maintenance Structural Strengthening Bearing Replacement Remedial diagnosis and SRG Global can provide a number of SRG Global can provide bridge investigation methods to upgrade existing bridges bearing replacement including all Understanding the extent and including carbon fibre strengthening access, temporary works design and condition of any structural and external post-tensioning using jacking. defect is critical to the process strand and bar systems. of rectification. SRG Global can Our specialist in-house design Concrete overlays and joint provide the necessary experience engineers, teamed with our maintenance and knowledge to ensure the experienced site personnel and best solutions are developed. access teams enable SRG Global to We have extensive experience in Investigative works include defect undertake all works associated with bridge refurbishment projects for mapping, concrete spalling your bridge strengthening project local authorities where concrete and crack injection, joint and from start to finish. overlays or joint maintenance are structural crack investigation and required. We can perform all works rectification, waterproofing and in-house including design, access, water penetration, reporting and construction and maintenance. repair budget assistance, design and remediation advice and carbon fibre design and analysis. CIVIL Project Statistics BRIDGE PROJECTS BY SRG GLOBAL BRIDGE YEAR STRUCTURE TYPE SCOPE Wanneroo Rd Ocean Reef Road Interchange 2019 Three span concrete bridge and arched underpass structure Design and construction of a two new bridges Design and construction of concrete substructure and steel Jounama Small Hydro Accessway 2019 Twin steel girder pedestrian bridge superstructure Windsor Bridge 2019 Incrementally launched twin concrete girder bridge Incremental launching and post-tensioning Charleyong Bridge 2018 Five span super T bridge Construction of bridge substructure and superstructure Weaber Plain Bridge 2018 Three span concrete bridge Construction of new concrete bridge on Great Northern Hwy Construction of bridge substructure and superstructure Bolivia Hill Upgrade 2018 Balanced cantilever bridge with 150m main span inclusive of formwork traveller and post-tensioning Albany Highway Bridge 2018 Reinforced concrete box culverts on an in-situ link slab Demolition of existing and construction of new bridge Design and construction of substructure and superstructure Durrumbul Causeway Reconstruction 2017 Single span concrete bridge with permanent steel forms using InQuik bridging system Three span composite traffic bridge and one span steel truss Construction of two new bridges as part of the Margaret Margaret River Perimeter Road 2017 pedestrian bridge River Perimeter Road Stage 2 project Emigrant Creek Bridge, NSW 2017 Three span balanced cantilever Traveller supply, superstructure and post-tensioning Duck Creek Bridge, NSW 2017 Three span bulbed super T Superstructure bridge construction Manilla River Bridge, NSW 2017 Nine span concrete bridge External post-tensioning Nth Sth Corridor Torrens Rd to River Torrens, SA 2017 Rail bridge Supply, installation, stressing and grouting of macalloy bar Garden Island High Level Bridge WA 2017 Concrete precast super ‘T’ structure Bearing replacement Northam Bridge No 638, WA 2017 Timber structure, reinforced concrete deck Major bridge refurbishment of 25 span bridge Toodyay Bridges Refurbishment Program, WA 2017 Timber structure, reinforced concrete deck Major bridge refurbishment of three bridges Cast insitu single cell bridge structures, precast segmental viaduct Doha Metro Rail - Red Line (South), Qatar 2017 structures Post-tensioning Indian Ocean Road Bridge No 660, WA 2017 Timber structure, reinforced concrete deck Major bridge refurbishment of six span bridge Incremental launching of steel girder / concrete composite Treendale Bridge No 5370, WA 2017 Steel / concrete composite bridge, twin girder bridge Tallarook Bridges, VIC 2017 Reinforced concrete Carbon fibre strengthening, lateral restraints, steel painting CTW Bell Street Bridge, VIC 2017 Reinforced concrete Deck repairs Charles Street Bridge Perth WA 2017 Incrementally launched concrete box girder Post-tensioning, bearing installation and launching services Old Mandurah Traffic Bridge Replacement WA 2017 Incrementally launched concrete box girder Post-tensioning and incremental launching services Monash Freeway 8 Bridges, VIC 2016 Reinforced concrete Carbon fibre strengthening Westgate Bridge, VIC 2016 Reinforced concrete Resin injection Bridge over Deniehy Street Granville, NSW 2016 T girder bridge Jacking and bearing replacement Paradise Dam Permanent Crossing Childers QLD 2016 Precast and in-situ concrete bridge Construction of a new bridge Moores Creek Rail Bridge Rockhampton QLD 2016 Timber bridge (100+ years old) Pier Replacement, Design and Construct Wadi Bani Souq Bridge, Oman 2016 Precast girders Post-tensioning North West Rail Bridge NSW 2016 Precast segmental - span by span External post-tensioning for 4.8km long viaduct Mafraq-Ghweifat Border Post Hwy Improvement, UAE 2016 Cast insitu multiple cell bridge structures Post-tensioning Cast
Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of a High Performance Concrete Box Girder Bridge

    Evaluation of a High Performance Concrete Box Girder Bridge

    Evaluation of a High Performance Concrete Box Girder Bridge Andreas Greuel T. Michael Baseheart, Ph. D. Graduate Research Assistant Associate Professor of Civil University of Cincinnati Engineering Cincinnati, Ohio University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio Bradley T. Rogers Engineer LJB, Inc. As part of the FHWA (Federal Highway Admin- Dayton, Ohio istration) High Performance Concrete Bridge Program, two full-scale truckload tests of Bridge GUE-22-6.57 were carried out. The main ob- jectives of these tests were to investigate the static and dynamic response of the high perfor- Richard A. Miller, Ph. D. mance concrete (HPC) structure. A secondary Associate Professor of Civil Engineering objective was to investigate the load transfer University of Cincinnati between the box girders through experimental Cincinnati, Ohio middepth shear keys. The structure was loaded using standard Ohio Department of Transporta- tion (ODOT) dump trucks. A model test of the bridge was conducted as well. It was found that the bridge behavior is well predicted using sim- ple models. The bridge behaves as a single unit and all girders share the load almost equally. Bahram M. Shahrooz, Ph. D. The dynamic behavior of the bridge is typical Associate Professor of Civil for comparable structures. Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 60 PCI JOURNAL he use of high performance con- located on US Route 22, a heavily in that the Ohio box girder has only a crete (HPC) can lead to more traveled two-lane highway near Cam- 5 in. (127 mm ) thick bottom flange Teconomical bridge designs be- bridge, Ohio. rather than the 5.5 in.
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009

    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009

    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 FEbRuARy 2009 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS: Alan Briggs Robin Chinnery Laura Colman Dr David Dolan Dr Sue Graham-Taylor A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY: Jenni Howlett Cheryl-Anne McCann LATITUDE CREATIVE SERVICES Brooke Mandy HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION PROFESSIONALS Gina Pickering (Project Manager) NATIONAL TRUST (WA) Rosemary Rosario Alison Storey Prepared FOR ThE EAsTERN Metropolitan REgIONAL COuNCIL ON bEhALF OF Dr Richard Walley OAM Cover image: View upstream, near Barker’s Bridge. Acknowledgements The consultants acknowledge the assistance received from the Councillors, staff and residents of the Town of Bassendean, Cities of Bayswater, Belmont and Swan and the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC), including Ruth Andrew, Dean Cracknell, Sally De La Cruz, Daniel Hanley, Brian Reed and Rachel Thorp; Bassendean, Bayswater, Belmont and Maylands Historical Societies, Ascot Kayak Club, Claughton Reserve Friends Group, Ellis House, Foreshore Environment Action Group, Friends of Ascot Waters and Ascot Island, Friends of Gobba Lake, Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association, Maylands Yacht Club, Success Hill Action Group, Urban Bushland Council, Viveash Community Group, Swan Chamber of Commerce, Midland Brick and the other community members who participated in the heritage audit community consultation. Special thanks also to Anne Brake, Albert Corunna, Frances Humphries, Leoni Humphries, Oswald Humphries, Christine Lewis, Barry McGuire, May McGuire, Stephen Newby, Fred Pickett, Beverley Rebbeck, Irene Stainton, Luke Toomey, Richard Offen, Tom Perrigo and Shelley Withers for their support in this project. The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EMRC.
  • Review on Applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof

    Review on Applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof

    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 05 | May-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Review on applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof. P. J. Salunke2 1Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MGMCET, Maharashtra, India 2Head, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MGMCET, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - This paper gives a brief introduction to the 1874. Use of steel led to the development of cantilever cantilever bridges and its evolution. Further in cantilever bridges. The world’s longest span cantilever bridge was built bridges it focuses on system and construction of balanced in 1917 at Quebec over St. Lawrence River with main span of cantilever bridges. The superstructure forms the dynamic 549 m. India can boast of one such long bridge, the Howrah element as a load carrying capacity. As box girders are widely bridge, over river Hooghly with main span of 457 m which is used in forming the superstructure of balanced cantilever fourth largest of its kind. bridges, its advantages are discussed and a detailed review is carried out. Concrete cantilever construction was first introduced in Europe in early 1950’s and it has since been broadly used in design and construction of several bridges. Unlike various Key Words: Bridge, Balanced Cantilever, Superstructure, bridges built in Germany using cast-in-situ method, Box Girder, Pre-stressing cantilever construction in France took a different direction, emphasizing the use of precast segments. The various advantages of precast segments over cast-in-situ are: 1. INTRODUCTION i. Precast segment construction method is a faster method compared to cast-in-situ construction method.
  • Stirling Bridge

    Stirling Bridge

    ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA Western Australia Division NOMINATION OF STIRLING BRIDGE FOR AN ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA HERITAGE RECOGNITION AWARD Stirling Bridge, 2014 PREPARED BY ENGINEERING HERITAGE WESTERN AUSTRALIA ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DIVISION July 2014 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 2. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................. 4 3. LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 4. HERITAGE RECOGNITION NOMINATION FORM ....................................................... 7 5. OWNER'S LETTER OF AGREEMENT .......................................................................... 8 6. HISTORICAL SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 9 7. BASIC DATA .................................................................................................................. 10 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ....................................................................................... 11 8.1 Aesthetic Design Considerations .......................................................................... 11 8.2 Structural Design .................................................................................................. 13 8.3 Construction .........................................................................................................
  • Bridges for Planes, Trains, but Not Automobiles by David A

    Bridges for Planes, Trains, but Not Automobiles by David A

    bridges for Planes, Trains, buT noT auTomobiles By David A. Burrows, P.E., LEED AP BD+C ® British Airways 747 crossing beneath the Taxiway “R” bridge, June, 2012. Courtesy of City of Phoenix Aviation Department. Copyright s described in the August edition of STRUCTURE® maga- zine, Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport opened the first stage of their automated transit system, PHX Sky Train™, on April 8, 2013. Thousands of passengers have already boarded the Sky Train and experienced the comfortable five A th minute ride from the 44 Street Station through the East Economy Lot Station, over Taxiway “R” (more than 100 feet above Sky Harbor Blvd.), ending at Terminal 4. The next phase, known as Stage 1A, is currently under con- struction and continues Sky Train’s route from Terminal 4 to Terminal 3. Scheduled to be open in early 2015, Stagemagazine 1A, similar to the Stage 1 construction,S faces theT task ofR crossing U an active C T U R E taxiway. Unlike the first Stage’s crossing above Taxiway “R”, the current phase of construction crosses beneath Taxiways “S” and “T”. Both Stages’ taxiway crossings presented several design and construction challenges. A US Airways jet passes beneath the Taxiway R crossing with the PHX Sky Train overhead. Courtesy of City of Phoenix Aviation Department. The World’s First In addition to the challenging geometry was the schedule constraint On Oct. 10, 2010, a celebration to mark the re-opening of Taxiway for constructing the bridge. Because the construction required the “R” was held by the City of Phoenix with members of the City’s taxiway to be closed, a limited shutdown period of six months was Aviation Department, designers, contractors and media watching possible due to airport operations.
  • MAUNSELL & PARTNERS G Maunsell & Partners, Consulting

    MAUNSELL & PARTNERS G Maunsell & Partners, Consulting

    MAUNSELL & PARTNERS G Maunsell & Partners, Consulting and Chartered Civil Engineers, with offices in London, UK, Perth, WA and Melbourne, Victoria. PRIVATE ARCHIVES MANUSCRIPT NOTE (MN 2739; ACC 7559A ) SUMMARY OF CLASSES CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Includes Western Australian Government Railway; roads; bridges; mechanical work; plant. Acc. No. DESCRIPTION Western Australian Government Railways Commission. Railway standardisation and other works, Kwinana to Kalgoorlie 7559A/1 February 1962 CD‐01. Contract C1. Preliminary information to contractors 7559A/2 April 1962 CD‐02. Contract C1. Tender documents for Avon Valley deviation 15M .40C to 29M. 00C 7559A/3 August 1962 CD‐03. Contract C1‐A. Tender documents for Avon Valley deviation 15M .40C to 29M. 00C 7559A/4 August 1962 CD‐04. Contract C2. Contract documents for Avon Valley deviation 52M. 20C. to 71M. 00C. 7559A/5 June 1962 CD‐05.Contract C2.Computed earthworks quantities for Avon Valley deviation 52M. 20C. to 71M. 00C. 7559A/6 September 1962 CD‐06.Contract C3. Computed earthworks quantities for Avon Valley deviation 29M. 00C. to 52M 20C. 7559A/7 October 1962 CD‐07.Contract C3. Contract documents for Avon Valley deviation 29M. 00C. to 52M. 20C. 7559A/8 November 1963 CD‐08. Contract C4. Contract documents for Avon Valley deviation 11M. 65C to 15M. 40C. 7559A/9 February 1964 CD‐09. Contract C5. Contract documents for Avon Valley deviation 70M. 00C. to 74M. 52C 7559A/10 February 1965 CD‐10. Contract C5. West Northam marshalling yard C.B.H. Depot earthworks and drainage. MN 2739 1 of 12 Copyright SLWA ©2011 7559A/11 February 1964 CD‐11. Contract C6.
  • Swamp : Walking the Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain

    Swamp : Walking the Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain

    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2012 Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer Anandashila Saraswati Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation Saraswati, A. (2012). Swamp : walking the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ; and with the exegesis, A walk in the anthropocene: homesickness and the walker-writer. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/588 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. USE OF THESIS This copy is the property of Edith Cowan University. However, the literary rights of the author must also be respected. If any passage from this thesis is quoted or closely paraphrased in a paper of written work prepared by the user, the source of the passage must be acknowledged in the work.
  • New Perth Stadium Transport Project Definition Plan December 2012

    New Perth Stadium Transport Project Definition Plan December 2012

    new Perth Stadium Transport Project Definition Plan December 2012 Artist’s impression: pedestrian bridge location 0ii transport solution for the new Perth Stadium transport solution for the new Perth Stadium Artist’s impression: new Perth Stadium Station 03 contents key features 2 Appendix 1 19 Dedicated train services 2 Transport facilities to be funded Complementary bus services 3 by the Government Pedestrian connection to CBD 3 Appendix 2 19 Enhancing existing infrastructure 3 Indicative cashflow evolution of the transport solution 4 executive summary 6 Project Definition Outcomes 7 Infrastructure 15 Importance of rigour 16 Cost Estimates 16 Project Management 17 Staging 17 Cashflow 17 01 key features Passengers first. Holistic transport approach. Multiple transport options. The new Perth Stadium By applying the ‘tentacles of movement’ presents an opportunity for philosophy, spectators will be dispersed, rather than surging together in one the Public Transport Authority direction, ensuring fast and safe transfers (PTA) to concurrently develop and reducing the impacts on nearby the transport solution within residential and environmental areas. a new precinct at Burswood, Key features of the responsive and rather than retrofit it into a robust transport solution, to be delivered constrained space. for the start of the 2018 AFL season, include: Adopting the new Perth Stadium’s ‘fan first’ philosophy, the Transport Dedicated train services PDP reflects passenger needs and Six-platform Stadium Station for demands to create a ‘passenger first’ convenient loading and rapid transfers transport solution. to destinations. This will be achieved through Nearby stowage for up to 117 railcars a $298 million (July 2011 prices) to keep a continuous flow of trains integrated train, bus and pedestrian following events.
  • Single-Span Cast-In-Place Post-Tensioned Concrete

    Single-Span Cast-In-Place Post-Tensioned Concrete

    LRFD Example 1 1-Span CIPPTCBGB 1-Span Cast-in-Place Cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge. The bridge has a 160 Post-Tensioned feet span with a 15 degree skew. Standard ADOT 32-inch f-shape barriers will Concrete Box Girder be used resulting in a bridge configuration of 1’-5” barrier, 12’-0” outside [CIPPTCBGB] shoulder, two 12’-0” lanes, a 6’-0” inside shoulder and a 1’-5” barrier. The Bridge Example overall out-to-out width of the bridge is 44’-10”. A plan view and typical section of the bridge are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The following legend is used for the references shown in the left-hand column: [2.2.2] AASHTO LRFD Specification Article Number [2.2.2-1] AASHTOLRFD Specification Table or Equation Number [C2.2.2] AASHTO LRFD Specification Commentary [A2.2.2] AASHTO LRFD Specification Appendix [BDG] ADOT LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines Bridge Geometry Bridge length 160.00 ft Bridge width 44.83 ft Roadway width 42.00 ft Superstructure depth 7.50 ft Web spacing 9.25 ft Web thickness 12.00 in Top slab thickness 8.50 in Bottom slab thickness 6.00 in Deck overhang 3.33 ft Minimum Requirements The minimum span to depth ratio for a single span bridge should be taken as 0.045 resulting in a minimum depth of 7.20 feet. Use 7’-6” [Table 2.5.2.6.3-1] The minimum top slab thickness shall be as shown in the LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines. For a centerline spacing of 9.25 feet, the effective length is 8.25 feet resulting in a minimum thickness of 8.50 inches.
  • Achievement Ride Routes 2015

    Achievement Ride Routes 2015

    ACHIEVEMENT RIDE ROUTES 2015 50 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore, under the Narrows Bridge and onto the Kwinana Freeway shared path to Success. Turn off at Armadale Rd to Success (Cockburn Gateway) shops for refreshments. Return to Burswood reverse route. 75 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore, under the Narrows Bridge and onto Kwinana Freeway shared path to Success (Cockburn Gateway) shops for a coffee break. Return to bike path and continue south to Thomas Rd. The Shell Service Station on Thomas Road 150 m west of the Freeway sells food. Return to Burswood reverse route. 100 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore under Narrows Bridge and onto Kwinana Freeway bike path south to Baldivis. Turn off at Safety Bay Rd to Hungry Jacks, 650 m west of the Freeway. Return to Burswood reverse route. 150 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore under Narrows Bridge and onto Kwinana Freeway bike path south to Baldivis. Turn off at Safety Bay Rd to Hungry Jacks, 650 m west of Freeway. Top up water here as there are no water stops along the route south. Return to freeway bike path & continue south. Distances below are from Hungry Jacks. Left through tunnel under road at 23 km Turning point for 150 km is the Nambeelup Brook Bridge at 25 km. Return to Burswood reverse route. 200 km Achievement Ride From Burswood take the bike path along South Perth foreshore under Narrows Bridge and onto the Kwinana Freeway bike path south to Baldivis.
  • Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension

    Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension

    14 February 2012 Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension AECOM Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension Prepared for Roads ACT Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 2, 60 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia T +61 2 6201 3000 F +61 2 6201 3099 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 14 February 2012 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001 and ISO14001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety. \\AUCBR1FP001\Projects\60092506 - GDE Stage 2\8. Issued Documents\8.1 Reports\GDE Speed review\GDE stage 2 Speed Limits 20120214.docx Revision - 14 February 2012 AECOM Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension Quality Information Document Review of the Posted Speed Limit on the Gungahlin Drive Extension Ref Date 14 February 2012 Prepared by Peter Evans Reviewed by Rod Weeks, Tom Brimson Revision History Authorised Revision Revision Details Date Name/Position Signature 14-Feb-2012 For Information Marc Blackmore \\AUCBR1FP001\Projects\60092506 - GDE Stage 2\8.
  • Old Canberra Ged Martin This Book Was Published by ANU Press Between 1965–1991

    Old Canberra Ged Martin This Book Was Published by ANU Press Between 1965–1991

    Old Canberra Ged Martin This book was published by ANU Press between 1965–1991. This republication is part of the digitisation project being carried out by Scholarly Information Services/Library and ANU Press. This project aims to make past scholarly works published by The Australian National University available to a global audience under its open-access policy. First published in Australia 1978 Printed in Hong Kong for the Australian National University Press, Canberra ®Ged Martin 1978 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Martin, Ged. Episodes of old Canberra. (Canberra companions). ISBN 0 7081 15780. 1. Canberra — Social life and customs. I. Title (Series). 994'.7[1] North America: Books Australia, Norwalk, Conn., USA Southeast Asia: Angus & Robertson (S. E. Asia) Pty Ltd, Singapore Japan: United Publishers Services Ltd, Tokyo Designed by ANU Graphic Design Adrian Young Maps drawn in the Cartographic Office, E>epartment of Human Geography, ANU. Contents Introduction 1 The Explorers 8 The Early Settlers 26 Life in Early Canberra 42 The Aborigines 80 ::x:x:::x land over 2000 feet • Property ' Crossing • Ucertam site ? Church Methodist Church Coppms Crossmc Old Canberra IV Introduction I arrived in Canberra from England at Christmas 1972. Like most people, I accepted it as a totally modern city, entirely cut off from the past, planned solely for the future.