DOCSLIB.ORG

TURKEY's NOVEMBER 2002 ELECTIONS: a NEW BEGINNING? by Ali Carkoglu*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TURKEY'S NOVEMBER 2002 ELECTIONS: A NEW BEGINNING? By Ali Carkoglu* Turkey's November 2002 elections ended with a stunning victory for the new Justice and Development Party. Since only one other party reached the 10 percent minimum necessary to hold seats in parliament, the victorious group was left with close to a two-thirds' majority. This article analyzes the meaning of the election, the fate of the different parties, and the attitudes of the electorate Turkey's November 3, 2002, general about 39 percentage points of electoral elections ended with a predicted but still support from the April 1999 elections. impressive victory for the Justice and The two major opposition parties did not Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma perform much better. While the pro-Islamist Partisi-AKP), the first party since 1987 to Felicity Party (Saadet Partisi-SP) suffered a secure a clear majority in Parliament. The loss of 12.9 percentage points, the True rapid rise of AKP support marks another Path Party (Dogru Yol Partisi-DYP) lost step in the electoral collapse of centrist 2.5 percentage points. Besides CHP and politics in the country. The left-leaning AKP and to a lesser degree the Democratic Republican People’s Party (Cumhuriyet People’s Party (Demokratik Halk Partisi- Halk Partisi-CHP) is the only other party DEHAP), all opposition parties incurred passing the 10% nationwide electoral significant losses of electoral support. support threshold to gain seats in the Consequently, all the leaders of those losing Parliament. AKP got about 34 % of the centrist parties, except the leader of the SP, votes compared to 20% for CHP. The were forced to step aside. remaining 46% of votes did not elect The leadership of the winners seems anyone since all other parties did not gain committed to integrating Turkey into the minimum 10% needed. (See Table 1 Europe. However, their religiously below). conservative constituency is known to be The incumbent government's coalition skeptical toward EU membership. From the members suffered the heaviest losses. perspective of economic interests, AKP Compared to the 1999 election, the largest supporters seem to reflect resurgent incumbent coalition partner, the Democratic conservative Anatolian capital against the Left Party (Demokratik Sol Parti-DSP), secular establishment of Istanbul, the shrunk down to about 1.2%. It may have set largest city of Turkey. The influence of a world record for being the largest party in upwardly mobile Anatolian firms may aim one election and losing almost all its to shift the power balance in their favor support in the next one. Among the other through advocating irresponsible populist coalition partners, the Nationalist Action social and economic policies together with Party (Milliyetci Hareket Partisi-MHP) lost revitalized pro-Islamist actions and a push 9.6 percentage points, while the junior for private business gains through access to partner the Motherland Party (Anavatan or effective control of the government. Partisi-ANAP) lost 12.9 percentage points. If AKP does not keep a neutral stand in Hence, the coalition partners together lost such a power struggle among the top Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4 (December 2002) 30 Turkey's November 2002 Elections: A New Beginning? economic players it would be politically post-1980 Turkish party system. The self-destructive since the perception of electoral preferences reflected in election honesty is one of its main attractions. The outcomes are very volatile. On average, corruption associated with the previous over the more than half-century of liberalization period under the centrist competitive multi-party elections, nearly ANAP and DYP was one of the main 23% of the electorate changes its reasons for declining trust in the centrist preferences from one party to another in parties among the electorate. each election. In the early 1980s high Besides the issue of EU membership-- volatility was primarily due to a changing which the AKP leadership started to push as menu of parties facing the electorate due to soon as their electoral victory became the closing and merging of different parties. certain--a number of other issues present However, for at least the last three the new government with potentially elections--1995, 1999 and especially in explosive problems. Most obvious among 2002-- we observe that the electorate shifts those are the long-lasting Cyprus conflict from one party to another for reasons other and the impending military engagement in than the nonexistence of a previously Iraq. available party. On the domestic front, AKP’s Given the available election results and consultative meetings with a wide variety of expectations concerning the impact of civil society organizations seem to have continuing economic crisis on party pleased public opinion as a first step in the preferences, it should be hardly surprising direction of a more inclusive and open that an even higher level of volatility government. At the same time, though, the compared to 1999 preferences took place in AKP's overwhelming power coupled with November 2002. As Table 1 below shows, its Islamist politics could create serious nearly half of the electorate seem to have internal conflicts. In short, the message of shifted from one party to another from the the election may either be the end of 1999 to the 2002 elections. If we divide the politics in Turkey as it has been practiced party system into four ideological groups-- for decades, or a temporary deviation, extreme left, center-left, center-right, and which voters will reverse at the next pro-Islamist and nationalist party groups-- opportunity. we observe that about 20% of the voters This article provides a short overview of seem to have switched from one group to the main characteristics of the Turkish party another between the1999 and 2002 system and electoral behavior. The elections. Besides CHP, and DEHAP, November 2002 election is evaluated in which inherited its predecessor HADEP’s light of these historical patterns. Next, the electoral tradition of representing Kurdish campaign period will be critically ethnicity in the country, there are no parties considered and linked to characteristic which gained on their 1999 vote level. AKP patterns of the Turkish party system. and the Young Party (Genc Parti-GP) are Finally, I will venture into a speculative the other two newly established parties that appraisal of the near-term implications of gathered significant electoral support. GP the new AKP government. was the dark horse of the November 2002 elections and relied on no previous electoral PARTY SYSTEM tradition. AKP clearly had the RP/FP CHARACTERISTICS AND VOTE constituency as their target and competed DETERMINANTS with the SP for that base. In short, Looking at the Turkish electoral scene increasing volatility seems to benefit new after the November 2002 elections and right-of-the-center parties. trying to foresee what lies beyond, one In 2002 the pro-Islamist and nationalist needs to bear in mind characteristics of the group of parties peaked in electoral support 31 Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4 (December 2002) Ali Carkoglu reaching nearly 53%, an all-time high in support for getting representation in the Turkish politics. As such, this group is parliament, more and more parties were about 3.3 times larger than the center-right able to attract voters’ support in elections parties and about 2.5 times larger than the and ultimately winning representation. This center-left parties. However, the real is usually achieved by splits in parties after question is whether and when will the elections. Factions that could not get 10% electoral support become consolidated and nation-wide support first get in on a party stabilized behind these new parties. If the list and then become independents or create past pattern continues, the next election is a smaller party. Larger centrist parties could bound to create not only some deterioration get representatives of smaller fractions into of electoral support for AKP but rather a the parliament under an umbrella ticket. major one creating yet another new right- However, they could not keep them under of-center winner. the same umbrella for long since their Table 1: Election results and aggregate party system characteristics 1999-2002 Seats in the Vote Share (%) % wins Parliament and 1999 2002 losses 1999 2002 Democratic Left Party (Demokratik Sol Parti-DSP) 22.19 1.22 -20.97 136 0 Nationalist Action Party (Milliyetci Hareket Partisi-MHP) 17.98 8.34 -9.64 129 0 Virtue Party (Fazilet Partisi-FP)* 15.41 2.48 -12.93 111 0 Motherland Party (Anavatan Partisi-ANAP) 13.22 5.13 -8.09 86 0 True Path Party (Dogru Yol Partisi-DYP) 12.01 9.55 -2.46 85 0 Republican People's Party (Cuhuriyet Halk Partisi-CHP) 8.71 19.40 10.69 0 178 People's Democarcy Party (Halkin Demokrasi Partisi-HADEP)** 4.75 6.23 1.48 0 0 Grand Unity Party (Buyuk Birlik Partisi-BBP) 1.46 1.02 -0.44 0 0 Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi-AKP) 0.00 34.28 34.28 0 363 Young Party (Genc Parti-GP) 0.00 7.25 7.25 0 0 Independents*** 0.87 0.99 0.12 3 9 Total 96.60 95.89 550 550 Other Parties 3.40 4.11 0.71 Volatility 20.15 50.91 **** Fractionalization 85.15 81.44 ***** % of vote unrepresented in the Parliament (%) 18.32 45.33 Extreme-Left (EL) 6.02 7.27 Center-Left (CL) 31.35 21.77 Center-Right (CR) 26.77 16.13 Pro-Islamist & Nationalist (PIN) 34.85 53.37 Ideological Volatility 12.70 20.00 **** *In 2002 Felicity Party (Saadet Partisi-SP) **In 2002 Democratic People's Party (Demokratik Halk Partisi-DEHAP) ***In 1950 9 independents gained seats in the Parliament, in 1954 10 and in 1969 13 independents won seats.
Recommended publications
  • Political Parties and Welfare Associations

    Political Parties and Welfare Associations

    Department of Sociology Umeå University Political parties and welfare associations by Ingrid Grosse Doctoral theses at the Department of Sociology Umeå University No 50 2007 Department of Sociology Umeå University Thesis 2007 Printed by Print & Media December 2007 Cover design: Gabriella Dekombis © Ingrid Grosse ISSN 1104-2508 ISBN 978-91-7264-478-6 Grosse, Ingrid. Political parties and welfare associations. Doctoral Dissertation in Sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, 2007. ISBN 978-91-7264-478-6 ISSN 1104-2508 ABSTRACT Scandinavian countries are usually assumed to be less disposed than other countries to involve associations as welfare producers. They are assumed to be so disinclined due to their strong statutory welfare involvement, which “crowds-out” associational welfare production; their ethnic, cultural and religious homogeneity, which leads to a lack of minority interests in associational welfare production; and to their strong working-class organisations, which are supposed to prefer statutory welfare solutions. These assumptions are questioned here, because they cannot account for salient associational welfare production in the welfare areas of housing and child-care in two Scandinavian countries, Sweden and Norway. In order to approach an explanation for the phenomena of associational welfare production in Sweden and Norway, some refinements of current theories are suggested. First, it is argued that welfare associations usually depend on statutory support in order to produce welfare on a salient level. Second, it is supposed that any form of particularistic interest in welfare production, not only ethnic, cultural or religious minority interests, can lead to associational welfare. With respect to these assumptions, this thesis supposes that political parties are organisations that, on one hand, influence statutory decisions regarding associational welfare production, and, on the other hand, pursue particularistic interests in associational welfare production.
  • European Left Info Flyer

    European Left Info Flyer

    United for a left alternative in Europe United for a left alternative in Europe ”We refer to the values and traditions of socialism, com- munism and the labor move- ment, of feminism, the fem- inist movement and gender equality, of the environmental movement and sustainable development, of peace and international solidarity, of hu- man rights, humanism and an- tifascism, of progressive and liberal thinking, both national- ly and internationally”. Manifesto of the Party of the European Left, 2004 ABOUT THE PARTY OF THE EUROPEAN LEFT (EL) EXECUTIVE BOARD The Executive Board was elected at the 4th Congress of the Party of the European Left, which took place from 13 to 15 December 2013 in Madrid. The Executive Board consists of the President and the Vice-Presidents, the Treasurer and other Members elected by the Congress, on the basis of two persons of each member party, respecting the principle of gender balance. COUNCIL OF CHAIRPERSONS The Council of Chairpersons meets at least once a year. The members are the Presidents of all the member par- ties, the President of the EL and the Vice-Presidents. The Council of Chairpersons has, with regard to the Execu- tive Board, rights of initiative and objection on important political issues. The Council of Chairpersons adopts res- olutions and recommendations which are transmitted to the Executive Board, and it also decides on applications for EL membership. NETWORKS n Balkan Network n Trade Unionists n Culture Network Network WORKING GROUPS n Central and Eastern Europe n Africa n Youth n Agriculture n Migration n Latin America n Middle East n North America n Peace n Communication n Queer n Education n Public Services n Environment n Women Trafficking Member and Observer Parties The Party of the European Left (EL) is a political party at the Eu- ropean level that was formed in 2004.
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
  • The Making of SYRIZA

    The Making of SYRIZA

    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line Panos Petrou The making of SYRIZA Published: June 11, 2012. http://socialistworker.org/print/2012/06/11/the-making-of-syriza Transcription, Editing and Markup: Sam Richards and Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. June 11, 2012 -- Socialist Worker (USA) -- Greece's Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA, has a chance of winning parliamentary elections in Greece on June 17, which would give it an opportunity to form a government of the left that would reject the drastic austerity measures imposed on Greece as a condition of the European Union's bailout of the country's financial elite. SYRIZA rose from small-party status to a second-place finish in elections on May 6, 2012, finishing ahead of the PASOK party, which has ruled Greece for most of the past four decades, and close behind the main conservative party New Democracy. When none of the three top finishers were able to form a government with a majority in parliament, a date for a new election was set -- and SYRIZA has been neck-and-neck with New Democracy ever since. Where did SYRIZA, an alliance of numerous left-wing organisations and unaffiliated individuals, come from? Panos Petrou, a leading member of Internationalist Workers Left (DEA, by its initials in Greek), a revolutionary socialist organisation that co-founded SYRIZA in 2004, explains how the coalition rose to the prominence it has today.
  • Analyzing Party Positions and Electoral Dynamics in Turkey

    Analyzing Party Positions and Electoral Dynamics in Turkey

    International Journal of Political Science & Urban Studies • Uluslararası Siyaset Bilimi ve Kentsel Araştırmalar Dergisi Cilt 7, Sayı 2, Eylül 2019, ISSN 2630-6263, ss. 382-404 • DOI: 10.14782/ipsus.623236 RESEARCH ARTICLE / ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ Analyzing Party Positions and Electoral Dynamics in Turkey Türkiye’de Partilerin Konumları ve Seçim Dinamiklerinin Analizi * Arda Can KUMBARACIBAŞI 1 Abstract This article examines the June and November 2015 general elections in Turkey – the final elections before Turkey’s transition into a presidential system – focusing on the political environment leading up to the elections, the coalition deals and potential coalition scenarios between the two elections and the aftermath of the November elections. The analysis is two-fold: first section looks into the background of electoral politics in Turkey and how policy dimensions of parties changed or stabilized over the years, covering the concepts of coalition potential, party adaptability and survival. The second section looks into electoral geography in Turkey, changes in voting patterns, strategic voting and the discrepancies in numbers in 2015. Keywords: Turkish Politics, Elections, Coalitions, Party Positions, Party Politics, AKP. Öz Bu çalışma Türkiye’de başkanlık sistemine geçilmeden önceki son seçimler olan Haziran ve Kasım 2015 genel seçimlerini, seçimler öncesindeki siyasi sürece, iki seçim arasındaki dönemde yapılmış olan koalisyon görüşmelerine, olası koalisyon senaryolarına, ve seçimler sonrasındaki gelişmelere bakarak, incelemektedir. Bu analiz iki bölüme ayrılmaktadır. İlk bölüm Turkiye’de seçimlerin arka planını incelemekte; koalisyon potansiyeli, partilerin adaptasyonu ve partilerin kalıcılığı gibi kavramlar üzerinden, politika alanlarına göre parti konumlarının yıllar içerisinde ne kadar değişip değişmediğini analiz etmektedir. İkinci kısım ise Turkiye’deki seçim coğrafyasını ele alarak 2015’teki oy verme eğilimlerini, stratejik oyları ve seçim sonuçlarındaki uyuşmazlıkları tartışmaktadır.
  • Turkey's Republican People's Party and the EU

    Turkey's Republican People's Party and the EU

    DECEMBER 2019 112 TURKEY’S REPUBLICAN PEOPLE’S PARTY AND THE EU PRECONDITIONS FOR EU-TURKEY RELATIONS IN THE SECULAR-NATIONALIST VISION Toni Alaranta DECEMBER 2019 112 TURKEY’S REPUBLICAN PEOPLE’S PARTY AND THE EU PRECONDITIONS FOR EU-TURKEY RELATIONS IN THE SECULAR-NATIONALIST VISION After 17 years of the Islamic-conservative AKP’s electoral hegemony, the secular-nationalist Republican People’s Party (CHP) achieved significant success in the recent municipal elections, and is now increasingly challenging President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The secular-nationalist political discourse has traditionally advanced the idea of making Turkey a modern nation-state closely attached to the West, yet the West is also seen as a potential threat. The CHP identifies itself as a social-democratic party, and is now trying to build a wide pro-democratic platform based on a social market economy and fundamental rights. The party’s strong secularist and Turkish nationalist core has made it difficult for the CHP to gain support among the Kurds and religious conservatives, and this remains challenging. Strong nationalism and suspicion about the West are deeply ingrained in Turkey’s political culture. On the other hand, in order to be inherently coherent, the secular-nationalist vision requires an ideological attachment to the Western world. Stemming from these premises, under the CHP’s government, Turkey’s foreign policy would likely prioritize good relations with the West, and re-invigorate the country’s EU prospect. TONI ALARANTA Senior Research Fellow European Union Research Programme Finnish Institute of International Affairs ISBN 978-951-769-627-2 ISSN 2242-0444 Language editing: Lynn Nikkanen The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is an independent research institute that produces high-level research to support political decisionmaking and public debate both nationally and internationally.
  • Electoral Processes in the Mediterranean

    Electoral Processes in the Mediterranean

    Electoral Processes Electoral processes in the Mediterranean This chapter provides information on jority party if it does not manage to Gorazd Drevensek the results of the presidential and leg- obtain an absolute majority in the (New Slovenia Christian Appendices islative elections held between July Chamber. People’s Party, Christian Democrat) 0.9 - 2002 and June 2003. Jure Jurèek Cekuta 0.5 - Parties % Seats Participation: 71.3 % (1st round); 65.2 % (2nd round). Monaco Nationalist Party (PN, conservative) 51.8 35 Legislative elections 2003 Malta Labour Party (MLP, social democrat) 47.5 30 9th February 2003 Bosnia and Herzegovina Med. Previous elections: 1st and 8th Februa- Democratic Alternative (AD, ecologist) 0.7 - ry 1998 Federal parliamentary republic that Parliamentary monarchy with unicam- Participation: 96.2 %. became independent from Yugoslavia eral legislative: the National Council. in 1991, and is formed by two enti- The twenty-four seats of the chamber ties: the Bosnia and Herzegovina Fed- Slovenia are elected for a five-year term; sixteen eration, known as the Croat-Muslim Presidential elections by simple majority and eight through Federation, and the Srpska Republic. 302-303 proportional representation. The voters go to the polls to elect the 10th November 2002 Presidency and the forty-two mem- Previous elections: 24th November bers of the Chamber of Representa- Parties % Seats 1997 tives. Simultaneously, the two entities Union for Monaco (UPM) 58.5 21 Parliamentary republic that became elect their own legislative bodies and National Union for the Future of Monaco (UNAM) independent from Yugoslavia in 1991. the Srpska Republic elects its Presi- Union for the Monegasque Two rounds of elections are held to dent and Vice-President.
  • Explaining the Electoral Success of the AKP in Turkey

    Explaining the Electoral Success of the AKP in Turkey

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281747264 Does Housing Create Votes? Explaining the Electoral Success of the AKP in Turkey Research · September 2015 CITATIONS READS 0 429 3 authors: Melissa J. Marschall Abdullah Aydogan Rice University Rice University 49 PUBLICATIONS 1,184 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 34 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Alper Bulut Karadeniz Technical University 10 PUBLICATIONS 31 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Minority Representation in the US View project Local Elections in America View project All content following this page was uploaded by Melissa J. Marschall on 08 November 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Electoral Studies 42 (2016) 201e212 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Electoral Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/electstud Does housing create votes? Explaining the electoral success of the AKP in Turkey * Melissa Marschall a, , Abdullah Aydogan a, Alper Bulut b a Rice University, USA b Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey article info abstract Article history: In this paper we examine the rise and consolidation of the Justice and Development Party (Adelet ve Received 31 August 2015 Kalinma Partisi, AKP) by analyzing its success in local elections. Our examination of the durability of the Received in revised form AKP takes into account existing explanations of Turkish electoral politics such as economic voting, 15 December 2015 center-periphery relations, and traditional party cleavages, as well as the clientelistic tendencies of Accepted 15 February 2016 Turkish parties. We argue that the intensification of neo-liberal economic policies encouraged the AKP to Available online 22 February 2016 seek alternative sources for distributive politics, which it found in Turkey's Mass Housing Administration _ (TOKI).
  • Greco Eval III Rep 2009 5E Final Turkey PF PUBLIC

    Greco Eval III Rep 2009 5E Final Turkey PF PUBLIC

    DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF MONITORING Strasbourg, 26 March 2010 Public Greco Eval III Rep (2009) 5E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Turkey on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 46 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 22-26 March 2010) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Turkey joined GRECO in 2004. GRECO adopted the Joint First and Second Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval I Rep (2005) 3E) in respect of Turkey at its 27 th Plenary Meeting (10 March 2006). The aforementioned Evaluation Report, as well as its corresponding Compliance Report, are available on GRECO’s homepage ( http://www.coe.int/greco ). 2. GRECO’s current Third Evaluation Round (launched on 1 January 2007) deals with the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: Articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17, 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173), Articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (criminalisation of corruption). - Theme II – Transparency of party funding: Articles 8, 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns, and - more generally - Guiding Principle 15 (financing of political parties and election campaigns) . 3. The GRECO Evaluation Team for Theme II (hereafter referred to as
  • Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 25, 2021

    Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 25, 2021

    Page 1 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 25, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names Advocational International Democratic Advocational Party AID Party Party of British Columbia Advocates Advocational Democrats Advocational International Democratic Party Advocational International Democratic Party of BC Advocational Party of BC Advocational Party of British Columbia Democratic Advocates International Advocates B.C. New Republican Party Republican Party B.C. Vision B.C. Vision B.C. Vision Party BCV British Columbia Vision BC Citizens First Party BC Citizens First Party British Columbia Citizens First Party BC Ecosocialists BC Ecosocialists BC Eco-Socialists BC EcoSocialists BC Ecosocialist Alliance BC Ecosocialist Party BC First Party BC First BC Marijuana Party BC Marijuana Party British Columbia Marijuana Party Page 2 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 25, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names BC NDP BC NDP BC New Democratic Party BC New Democrats British Columbia New Democratic Party Formerly known as: New Democratic Party of B.C. NDP New Democratic Party New Democrats BC Progressive Party Pro BC BC Progressives Progressive Party BC Refederation Party BC Refed Formerly known as: Western Independence Party Formerly known as: Western Refederation Party of BC British Columbia Action Party BC Action Party BCAP British Columbia Direct Democracy British Columbia Direct BC Direct Party Democracy Party BC Direct Democracy Party Direct Democracy British Columbia Excalibur Party BC Excalibur Party British Columbia Liberal Party BC Liberal Party British Columbia Libertarian Party Libertarian Libertarian Party of BC British Columbia Party British Columbia Party BC Party BCP British Columbia Patriot Party B.C.
  • Why Do Political Parties Split? Understanding Party Splits and Formation of Splinter Parties in Turkey

    Why Do Political Parties Split? Understanding Party Splits and Formation of Splinter Parties in Turkey

    WHY DO POLITICAL PARTIES SPLIT? UNDERSTANDING PARTY SPLITS AND FORMATION OF SPLINTER PARTIES IN TURKEY A PhD Dissertation by ÖZHAN DEMİRKOL Department of Political Science İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara August 2014 To Defne and Günay WHY DO POLITICAL PARTIES SPLIT? UNDERSTANDING PARTY SPLITS AND FORMATION OF SPLINTER PARTIES IN TURKEY Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by ÖZHAN DEMİRKOL In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNİVERSİTY ANKARA AUGUST 2014 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science. -------------------------------------------- Assistant Professor Zeki Sarıgil Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science. -------------------------------------------- Professor Elizabeth Özdalga Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science. -------------------------------------------- Assistant Professor Cenk Saraçoğlu Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science. -------------------------------------------- Assistant Professor Ioannis N. Grigoriadis Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science.
  • Secularist Divide and Turkey's Descent Into Severe Polarization

    Secularist Divide and Turkey's Descent Into Severe Polarization

    One The Islamist- Secularist Divide and Turkey’s Descent into Severe Polarization senem aydın- düzgİt n multiple different measures of polarization, Turkey today is one of Othe most polarized nations in the world.1 Deep ideological and policy- based disagreements divide its political leaders and parties; Turkish so- ciety, too, is starkly polarized on the grounds of both ideology and social distance.2 This chapter focuses on the bases and manifestations of polar- ization in Turkey, the main reasons behind its increase, and its ramifica- tions for the future of democracy and governance in the country. The current dominant cleavage between secularists and Islamists has its roots in a series of reforms intended to secularize and modernize the coun- try after the foundation of the Turkish Republic in 1923. These reforms created a deep division within Turkish society, but until the beginning of the twenty- first century, the secularist elite dominated key state institu- tions such as the military, allowing it to repress conservative groups and thus keep conflict over the soul of Turkey from coming into the open. Since 2002, however, the remarkable electoral success of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi; AKP) has brought the Islamist- secularist divide to the fore. Despite the AKP’s initial moderation, several developments, including 17 Carothers-O’Donohue_Democracies Divided_i-viii_1-311.indd 17 7/24/19 10:32 AM 18 SENEM AYDIN- DÜZGI˙T the collapse of the European Union (EU) accession process, the success of polarization as an electoral strategy, and undemocratic threats from the secularist state establishment, pushed the AKP toward increasingly populist, divisive rhetoric and politics, beginning with the 2007 general elections.