<<

1.3 algebra

Cartesian in terms of component transformations under change of were considered in Section 1.2. In Section 1.3 Cartesian tensors in its equivalent invariant form are considered. Since second-order tensors are most important in applications, attention is confined to second-order tensors in Sections 1.3.1 to 1.3.5.

1.3.1 Second-order tensors

A second-order Cartesian tensor T is a linear mapping of the into itself, i.e.,

T :  .

The element (vector) in to which the vector u maps is denoted Tu . The tensor is linear if,

TTT()uv+= u +  v . (1.3.1)

Let  ( , ) denote the set of all linear mappings from to . Then  ( , ) is itself a vector space with the element S   T defined by,

()()(),ST+=uu S +  T u " ST, Î  ( , ), ,   , " u Î . (1.3.2)

The inner product ST is defined by,

()STuu= S () T , " ST, Î  ( , ), " u Î . (1.3.3)

The zero tensor 0 maps every vector in to the zero vector 0 and the identity tensor I maps every vector in to itself,

0Iu0==", uu uÎ . (1.3.4)

The set of all bilinear functions over  forms a vector space over , denoted by (  ,

) which may be identified with  ( , ). If an {ei} is chosen for , then the bilinear (ei  ej ) is defined so that,

()(,)eij e uvuv ij uv , . (1.3.5)

For an arbitrary member T of (  , ), (1.3.5) yields

TTT(,uv )uvijij ( e , e ) ( e ij , e )( e i e j )(,) uv  uv ,  . (1.3.6)

Hence from (1.3.6) the representation for T with respect to the basis {ei} is,

TT(,eeij )( e i e j ).

Comparing with T  Tij ei  e j , it is seen that T(ei ,e j ) is the component Tij of T relative to the basis {ei} .

December 16, 2019 1.3.1-1 Hence from (1.3.6),

T(,)uv  uTiijj v . (1.3.7) i.e., TT(,uv ) u ( v ). (1.3.8)

T In general uvvu··()TT¹ (). Hence the T of T is defined by,

T vuuv()TT () uv , , (1.3.9)

or equivalently,

TTT (,)vu= (,) uv .

T T With respect to an arbitrary orthnormal basis {ei }, the components of T are given by ()T ij= T ji , i.e.,

T T =ÄTjiiee j.

From the definition of TT given by (1.3.9) the following properties are obtained.

()TTTT  TTT ()ST  S  T ST,   (  , ), ,  . (1.3.10) TTT  ()ST T S 

T  A second-order tensor such that TT= is a . Here TTij= ji .

It is seen that I is symmetric and that I(,)uv= u· v.

 A second-order tensor such that TTT =- is a skew-symmetric (or antisymmeteric) tensor. Here

TTij=- ji .

 The trace of T is defined with respect to an orthonormal basis {ei } as,

trTTT==Tiiee i· i = ( ee i , i ).

 The of T is defined as the determinant of the T of components of T with respect to an orthonormal basis.

det T ==ijkTT i123 j T k ijk TT 123 i j T k .

It can also be shown that,

1 det T  6 ijk pqrTT ip jq T kr .

December 16, 2019 1.3.1-2  When detT ¹ 0 , there exists a unique inverse tensor T-1 such that,

11 TT T T I  11 1 det(TT ) (det )  ST,  (  , ), det(S )  0 . (1.3.11) 111 ()ST T S    The adjugate tensor of T denoted by adjT , is defined by (see eqn (38) Chadwick, 1976),

adj(TTT )(ab ) ( a  b )  ab ,  .(a)

When T is invertible, i.e., when T1 exists, it can be shown from eqn (a) that

adj(TTTT1 ) (det )  . (1.3.12)

It can be easily shown that

det (adjTT ) (det )2 . (b)

 Problem 1.3.1 Suppose Aijkl are as defined in Problem 1.2.4. Show that (a) if Tij are the components of a symmetric CT(2) then

 ATijkl kl T ij,0 AT ijkl kl

and (b) if Tij are the components of a skew-symmetric CT(2) then

 AijklTATT kl0, ijkl kl ij .

Problem 1.3.2 If Tij are the components of an arbitrary CT(2), show that ijkT jk are the

components of a CT(1). Deduce that Tij is symmetric if and only if ijkT jk  0.

Problem 1.3.3 If Wij are the components of an antisymmetric CT(2) W then the vector w 1 with components wWiijkkj 2  is called the axial vector of W . Show that ipqwW i qp and that, for an arbitrary vector aw,  aW a. Deduce that uv is the axial vector of vuuv.

Problem 1.3.4 If

00T12  T T 00 12  000

is the matrix representing the components of an antisymmetric CT(2) T with respect to basis {ei },

show that, for any change of basis eeiiijj Q e such that ee33 , the matrix representing the components of T is unchanged.

December 16, 2019 1.3.1-3 1.3.1-A1 Useful identities

The following properties can be deduced from the previous equations:

()()()uvwuwvw+Ä=Ä+Ä , (1.3.1.A1.1) uvwÄ+()()()  =Ä+Ä uvuw  , (1.3.1.A1.2)

T ()()uvÄ=Ä vu, (1.3.1.A1.3)

()()()()uvwx vwux , (1.3.1.A1.4) AA()()uvÄ= u Ä v, (1.3.1.A1.5) T ()uvÄ=ÄAA u () v, (1.3.1.A1.6)

tr(uv ) uv , (1.3.1.A1.7) where uvwx,, , are arbitrary vectors and A is an arbitrary second-order tensor. See pgs. 21-22, eqns (42a,b), (43), (45), (46a,b) and (47a) of Chadwick (1976).

December 16, 2019 1.3.1-A1-1 1.3.1-A2 Inverse of the 3x3 matrix obtained from the definition of the adjugate tensor

The components of the adjugate tensor adjT are (pg. 47, Chadwick (1976)),

1 (adjT )ij= 2  ipq jrsTT pr qs .

T 11 \ (adjT )ij==22 ipq jrsTT rp sq  irs jpq TT pr qs .

adj(TT ) From eqn (1.3.12), T1  , (detT ) 11 \ ()TT1T (adj) 1  TT. (1.3.1.A2.1) ij(detTT ) ij (det ) 2 irs jpq pr qs

From matrix algebra (pg. 210, Noble (1969)),

adjA A1  , (1.3.1.A2.2) det A where adjA is the adjoint of the matrix, defined as the transpose of the matrix of cofactors.

Consider the 3x3 matrix,

A11AA 12 13 A  A AA. 21 22 23 A31AA 32 33

()()()AA22 33 AA 32 23 AA 21 33 AA 31 23 AA 21 32  AA 31 22 The matrix of cofactors B ()()()AA  AA AA  AA  AA  AA . 12 33 32 13 11 33 31 13 11 32 31 12 ()()()AA12 23 AA 22 13 AA 11 23 AA 21 13 AA 11 22  AA 21 12

()()()AA22 33 AA 32 23 AA 12 33 AA 32 13 AA 12 23  AA 22 13 adjABT  (AA  AA ) ( AA  AA )  ( AA  AA ) . 21 33 31 23 11 33 31 13 11 23 21 13 ()()()AA21 32 AA 31 22 AA 11 32 AA 31 12 AA 11 22  AA 21 12

1 Check whether, [adjA]ij 2  irs jpqA prA qs .

1 1 [adjA]112  1rs 1 pqA prAAAAA qs 22 33 32 23 , [adjA]122  1rs 2 pqA prAAAAA qs ( 12 33 32 13 ), … 1 [adjA]332  3rs 3 pqA prAAAAA qs 11 22 21 12 .

Hence, from eqns (1.3.1.A2.1) and (1.3.1.A2.2) it can be concluded that the inverse of a 3x3 matrix obtained from the definition of the adjugate tensor for second-order tensors and the inverse of a 3x3 matrix obtained from matrix algebra are the same.

Ref: Noble, B., 1969, Applied , Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey. (BN)

December 16, 2019 1.3.1-A2-1