DOCSLIB.ORG

One Devonport Blueprint 2050

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
One Devonport Blueprint 2050 ONE Devonport - Blueprint A Blueprint for the Future ONE Devonport - Blueprint ONE Devonport - Blueprint Foreword Strategic Context HM Naval Base Devonport and Devonport Royal The overriding drive will be to develop the site to The Maritime Strategy 2035 provides coherent direction This strategic context places several discrete Dockyard are entering a once in a generation period of support the military capabilities of the future, enabled by the Navy Board for the development of programmes requirements upon Devonport. These include the substantial investment which will see recapitalisation through a digitised Dockyard and improved ways of and plans out to 2035 and is the long-term national enduring deep maintenance of the Submarine and of the site to deliver support to the next generation of working to underpin a revolution in support. commitment to the Royal Navy. Underpinned by Surface Fleet, generating the Maritime Task Group Royal Navy platforms. The Devonport Blueprint, aligned the National Security Strategy it develops a Navy as (MTG) through the Surface Flotilla and Operational Sea to the Royal Navy Transformation Blueprint sets out The most vital asset to Devonport is its workforce part of Joint Force 2025 (JF2025) capable of winning Training (OST) and support to the Future Commando the direction of travel for this investment programme, which must be flexible and able to adapt to the warfighting at scale, maintenance of the Continuous Force. signalling the key changes in workforce, capability and rapidly changing operational context and industrial At Sea Deterrent (CASD) and projection of power and infrastructure which will underpin support to the Fleet. innovation. Local and national apprentice and graduate influence globally through Carrier Strike Group (CSG). programmes will afford the site with the skill-sets The facilities at the Devonport site represent a UK required to effectively maintain new technology strategic asset and are critical to Royal Navy outputs in and future-proof Devonport’s enduring outputs. In Devonport’s roles as an Operating Base and Centre of addition to challenging and rewarding work, a key Maritime Capability Deep Maintenance for surface ships and submarines. element of our compelling offer to the workforce is an SDSR 15: Joint Force 2025 Maritime Strategy 2035 This is complimented by significant Fleet Time environment which is safe and secure with modern Management Strategy 2050 Engineering Support capability both at home and facilities that support all who operate in the Naval Base overseas. In this capacity, Devonport provides a unique and Dockyard. contribution to the Royal Navy’s top three outputs of Continuous at Sea Deterrence (CASD), the Carrier Strike At a wider level, the Devonport Blueprint will enable Royal Navy Group (CSG) and amphibious Littoral Response Group. the delivery of the Maritime Strategy 2035 and the Maritime Capability Management Strategy 2050; with a Transformation Blueprint Work is already underway for the arrival of the new horizon that shapes the long-term and recognises the New Navy One Devonport Blueprint T26 Frigates and the immediate future will also bring historical significance of the Devonport location, which the start of some very substantial facility investment endures for as long as the maritime domain remains of and development to support the future submarine significance to UK interests. programme. HMNB Devonport DNS Business Plan Business Plan Vision A World Class, Secure, Safe, Integrated Operating and Support Base for the Royal Navy and NATO Mission Meet the support and operating requirements for the Royal Navy and the UK’s allies, from the South West, reaching worldwide 2 3 ONE Devonport - Blueprint ONE Devonport - Blueprint How Devonport Contributes One Devonport Principles In order to meet the strategic direction, the One The Type 23 forward presence for maritime security HM Naval Base Devonport and Devonport Royal 1. Restore choice for Defence by: Devonport Blueprint articulates how we will meet operations will be sustained through a Rear Link centre Dockyard will remain a strategic national asset into Building resilience and agility into support and the overarching aim of delivering safety, security, for rotating ships’ companies and developed as an the next century. The long-term nature of delivering operations. operational availability and contingent capability, enduring and scalable capability to the Future Frigate the Continuous at Sea Deterrent (CASD) and wider on behalf of Navy Command and Defence Nuclear Force as required. submarine programme requires decisive long- 2. Enhance the ‘Lived Experience’ for our Organisation. This Blueprint identifies the scheduled term planning. Critical site functions, from surface people by: and envisaged future projects for stakeholders across As the baseport for the Royal Navy’s Hydrographic ship support for new classes of vessel through to Providing a safe and secure working environment. the Devonport site, aligning them to the four key Squadron, Devonport provides support and accommodating increasing numbers of service business areas of Port, Dockyard, Base and Barracks. maintenance to these vessels which spend extended personnel, must be carefully aligned to optimise Providing through-life learning for our workforce. The Blueprint links the outputs defined by higher level periods deployed on operations crucial to the support delivery. To foster a coherent, One Devonport strategies and plans as articulated in the Strategic of CASD and intelligence preparation of the battlespace approach, the following principles will underpin Improving the facilities offered and expanding Context. for the MTG. planning and delivery on site: capacity where appropriate. Devonport will continue to provide deep maintenance Increased focus on technology and innovation will Considering the wider community around to the Continuous At Sea Deterrent (CASD) and remain central to these outputs to enable the future Devonport in our planning, and site operations; Submarine Fleet including the Dreadnought Royal Navy. New technology such as Unmanned including service families and local residents. Programme, the UKs ultimate security guarantee. This Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) will be first used at will see further development of specialist nuclear Devonport as Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) targets, 3. Create momentum for Devonport by: facilities unique to Devonport. again augmenting the UK’s offering for specialist Championing good governance and timely training. conflict resolution, rapidly escalating problems. As the home of the UK’s high readiness amphibious capability, Devonport is integral to the Future Sustaining a trained and experienced workforce Commando Force; combining landing ship expertise ready to adapt to future challenges with the neighbouring Royal Marine units to underpin the Littoral Response Group. Revolutionising support through a digitally- enabled site and optimisation Devonport’s specialist Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) role will see the new T26 Class Frigate replace the T23 All Devonport planning will retain a clear line of sight ASW variant both to bolster capability in the North to the key functions of supporting ships, submarines, Atlantic in support of CASD and to provide critical the Royal Navy, UK Defence and NATO. In this respect, protection to the CSG. T26 will place different demands active integration which promotes a pan-site awareness on the support infrastructure such as the storage and of the multitude of future projects is crucial. Despite generation of Mission Modules. the diversity of the organisations across the site, both in terms of MOD and Industry Partners, only a One Devonport approach can effectively align activity and create value for Defence. 4 5 ONE Devonport - Blueprint ONE Devonport - Blueprint Delivery Vehicle Devonport Today Given the complexity of multiple MOD organisations, Port Base Industry Partners and shared site ownership, set The Port of Plymouth covers an expanse of water The Naval Base provides waterfront support and against the critical importance of maintaining CASD in excess of thirty square miles, with over eighty six services to ships of the Surface Flotilla, ships and generating the Maritime Task Group and Future miles of waterfront. The Naval Base has a waterfront undergoing Operational Sea Training (including many Commando Force, it is vital that outputs are co- extending over three miles with fourteen wharfs and foreign navies), visiting ships, and ships and submarines ordinated and future plans aligned to the Blueprint. jetties and is capable of berthing all classes of ships and entering or emerging from deep maintenance periods. A central HM Naval Base Programme Office and submarines of the Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary, This includes the provision of stores, administrative broader Virtual Joint Programme Office encompassing including the Queen Elizabeth class. In addition, support, oversight of the Fleet Accommodation Centre, key stakeholder organisations will drive site-wide there are three licensed buoys and several protected all aspects of MOD on-site security which processes planning and deconfliction by collating and coalescing anchorages in Plymouth Sound. over 20,000 visitors per month, nuclear and non-nuclear information on outputs, plans and scheduling. Strong infrastructure at Devonport (including the maintenance governance and communication between key site The Queen’s Harbour Master (QHM) controls the port and regeneration of more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Britain and the Royal Navy by Jeremy Black
    A Post-Imperial Power? Britain and the Royal Navy by Jeremy Black Jeremy Black ([email protected]) is professor of history at University of Exeter and an FPRI senior fellow. His most recent books include Rethinking Military History (Routledge, 2004) and The British Seaborne Empire (Yale University Press, 2004), on which this article is based. or a century and a half, from the Napoleonic Wars to World War II, the British Empire was the greatest power in the world. At the core of that F power was the Royal Navy, the greatest and most advanced naval force in the world. For decades, the distinctive nature, the power and the glory, of the empire and the Royal Navy shaped the character and provided the identity of the British nation. Today, the British Empire seems to be only a memory, and even the Royal Navy sometimes can appear to be only an auxiliary of the U.S. Navy. The British nation itself may be dissolving into its preexisting and fundamental English, Scottish, and even Welsh parts. But British power and the Royal Navy, and particularly that navy’s power projection, still figure in world affairs. Properly understood, they could also continue to provide an important component of British national identity. The Distinctive Maritime Character of the British Empire The relationship between Britain and its empire always differed from that of other European states with theirs, for a number of reasons. First, the limited authority and power of government within Britain greatly affected the character of British imperialism, especially, but not only, in the case of colonies that received a large number of British settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet Air Arm Awards
    FLEET AIR ARM AWARDS Including the Supersession of REAR ADMIRAL FLEET AIR ARM & COMMAND WARRANT OFFICER FLEET AIR ARM 20 February 2019 Welcome to Royal Naval Air Station Yeovilton for the Fleet Air Arm Awards Ceremony and the supersession of Rear Admiral Fleet Air Arm and Command Warrant Officer Fleet Air Arm. This event is the Fleet Air Arm’s opportunity to recognise team and individual efforts and achievement across all aspects of UK naval aviation and to mark the supersession of the Head of the Fleet Air Arm. Fleet Air Arm Awards Recognition of the exceptional contribution of an individual or team to UK naval aviation. Supersession of Rear Admiral Fleet Air Arm The Assistant Chief of Naval Staff (Aviation, Amphibious Capability and Carriers) and Rear Admiral Fleet Air Arm, is the professional head of the Fighting Arm. Today, Rear Admiral Keith E Blount CB OBE FRAeS hands over the role to Rear Admiral Martin Connell. Supersession of Command Warrant Officer Fleet Air Arm A central point of focus for all personnel, the Command Warrant Officer acts as an independent and autonomous Command Advisor, specifically responsible for the development of the Moral Component of Operational Capability. Today, WO1 Paul Stevenson hands over the role to WO1 Chris Boucher. Parade Programme 0915 Refreshments available in 14 Hangar. 1010 All guests to be seated in 14 Hangar. 1030 Guest of Honour arrives to open the ceremony. Opening Address by Commanding Officer RNAS Yeovilton. Presentation of Fleet Air Arm Awards. Prayers of thanksgiving. Supersession of Command Warrant Officer Fleet Air Arm. Supersession of Rear Admiral Fleet Air Arm.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 - Royal Navy Staff Contact List Surname Forename L&D Hub Role Contact No
    COVID-19 - ROYAL NAVY STAFF CONTACT LIST SURNAME FORENAME L&D HUB ROLE CONTACT NO. CONTACT EMAIL ARNOLD-BHATTI KHALIDA HMNB PORTSMOUTH eLA Work mob: 07513 483808 ASTON JIM 43 CDO RM CLYDE LT RN / OIC/ERO [email protected] Mil: 93255 6911, ATKINSON GARTH HMNB CLYDE LT CDR, RN [email protected] Civ: 01436 674321 Ext 6911 BAKER IAN RNAS Yeovilton Coord Contact Via TSM Contact via Pam Fisher BALLS SARA LDO APPS LT CDR, RN [email protected] BANKS TERRIE RNAS Yeovilton NRIO 07500 976770 Contact via Pam Fisher BEADNELL ROBERT HMNB PORTSMOUTH LT CDR, RN / OIC 07527 927699 BENNETT ZONA RNAS Yeovilton Coord Contact via Pam Fisher Contact via Pam Fisher BRADSHAW NICK 30 CDO RM, STONEHOUSE TUTOR 07376 335930 BRICE KAREN CTCRM IT Manager 07795 434832 Mil: 93781 2147 BRICKSTOCK STEPHEN RNAS CULDROSE OIC / ERO Civ: 01326 552147 [email protected] Mob: 07411 563346 BUTLER RACHEL HMNB DEVONPORT [email protected] CARPENTER NEIL 30 CDO RM, STONEHOUSE Co-ord / ELA 01752 217498 CHEAL ANDY LDO HQ CDR, RN 07976 455653 [email protected] CLARKE ELAINE RNAS CULDROSE Tutor 07962 118941 Contact via primary POC - OiC Steve Brickstock CLARKE SOPHIE RNAS CULDROSE EDO contact via OiC Contact via primary POC - OiC Steve Brickstock COLEMAN LAURA HMNB CLYDE [email protected] CRAWFORD COLJN NCHQ / HMS COLLINGWOOD RN ELC Scheme Manager [email protected] Mil: 9375 41509 DENWOOD MARTIN HMS RALEIGH OIC/ERO [email protected] Civ: 01752 811509 DRINKALL KATHRYN RNAS Yeovilton LT CDR, RN ASSIGNED TO COVID-19 [email protected] EASTERBROOK LEIGH 30 CDO RM, STONEHOUSE Co-ord/Reset/GCSEs 07770 618001 EWEN HAYLEY HMNB PORTSMOUTH Nelson Co-ord 02392 526420 1 09/04/20 SURNAME FORENAME L&D HUB ROLE CONTACT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum on Separation for Scotland
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry into the referendum on separation for Scotland are included. List of written evidence Page 1 Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent 1 2 Francis Tusa, Editor, Defence Analysis 8 3 Professor Jo Shaw, University of Edinburgh 14 4 Dr Phillips O’Brien, Scottish Centre for War Studies, University of Glasgow 21 5 Electoral Commission 24 6 Rt Hon Michael Moore MP, Secretary of State for Scotland 28 7 Ministry of Defence 29 8 Brian Buchan, Chief Executive, Scottish Engineering 46 9 Babcock 47 Written evidence from Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent Introduction If Scotland were to become independent, its relationship with the United Kingdom would have to be defined in the fields of nationality law and immigration law and policy. This note offers a summary of the relationship between the Irish state1 and the United Kingdom in those fields, and some thoughts on possible implications for Scottish independence. 1. Nationality Law 1.1 The Irish case A new nationality The nationality law of a new state must necessarily provide for two matters: an initial population of nationals on the date of independence, and the acquisition and loss of nationality on an ongoing basis. In the case of the Irish state, the initial population was defined by Article 3 of the Irish Free State Constitution of 1922. Article 3 conferred Irish Free State citizenship upon a person if they were domiciled in the “area of the jurisdiction of the Irish Free State” on the date the state was founded (6 December 1922), provided (a) they had been resident in that area for the previous seven years, or (b) they or one of their parents had been born in “Ireland”.2 A full framework of nationality law, covering all aspects of acquisition and loss of nationality, was not then adopted until the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Career Guide
    ROYAL NAVAL RESERVE Your career guide YOUR ROLE | THE PEOPLE YOU’LL MEET | THE PLACES YOU’LL GO WELCOME For most people, the demands of a job and family life are enough. However, some have ambitions that go beyond the everyday. You may be one of them. In which case, you’re exactly the kind of person we’re looking for in the Royal Naval Reserve (RNR). The Royal Naval Reserve is a part-time force of civilian volunteers, who provide the Royal Navy with the additional trained people it needs at times of tension, humanitarian crisis, or conflict. As a Reservist, you’ll have to meet the same fitness and academic requirements, wear the same uniform, do much of the same training and, when needed, be deployed in the same places and situations as the regulars. Plus, you’ll be paid for the training and active service that you do. Serving with the Royal Naval Reserve is a unique way of life that attracts people from all backgrounds. For some, it’s a stepping stone to a Royal Navy career; for others, a chance to develop skills, knowledge and personal qualities that will help them in their civilian work. Many join simply because they want to be part of the Royal Navy but know they can’t commit to joining full-time. Taking on a vital military role alongside your existing family and work commitments requires a great deal of dedication, energy and enthusiasm. In return, we offer fantastic opportunities for adventure, travel, personal development and friendships that can last a lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilians: the Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet
    Chief of Navy Essay Competition The Youth Division (MacDougall Prize) Civilians: The Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet “We need to think differently […] by reviewing our basic operating concepts, reimagining the way that Navy should view itself in the twenty-first century, re-examining our assumptions and, most importantly, re-engineering our modus operandi…”1 – Vice Admiral Tim Barrett AO CSC RAN On 3rd September 1939 Australia declared war on Germany and by 1941 was seeking innovative ways to sustain the war effort at sea. This need served as the genesis of two important augmentations to the Royal Australian Navy (RAN): the Women’s Royal Australian Naval Service (WRANS) in April2 and the Naval Auxiliary Patrol (NAP) that June3. This essay will briefly identify the role played by the aforementioned services in supplementing an RAN stretched for resources before identifying similar challenges in the Navy of today. It will then explore the possibility of rectifying this by increasing the use of civilian support across the RAN, such as through the introduction of a modern Australian Fleet Auxiliary. Spread across the globe, the RAN realised it would need to do everything it could to maximise the availability of her sailors and warships while continuing to maintain a suitable presence on the home front. For this reason, both the WRANS and NAP would target those not eligible to serve in conflict at sea. Officer Commanding Sydney Naval Establishments Commodore Muirhead-Gould was quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald on the 4th November 1941 as saying the NAP “would not release any member from any other kind of service under the laws of the Commonwealth” and that, while “applications for enrolment were being received from unmarried men under 35 […] these men could be enrolled in the patrol only if they were in reserve occupations or medically unfit”4.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of REQUIREMENTS for the Supply of Upholstery and Soft
    UPHOLSTERY AND SOFT FURNISHINGS STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS – MEDGS/0011 STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS for the supply of Upholstery and Soft Furnishings UPHOLSTERY AND SOFT FURNISHINGS STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS – MEDGS/0011 CONTENTS Section Title 1. Introduction 2. Quality, Defects and Non Conformance 3. Prices 4. Logistics 5. Development 6. Management 7. Key Performance Indicator 8. One Off Special Item or Service Requests 9. Electronic Catalogue Annexes A Distribution Addresses B Authorised Demanders B1 Delivery Addresses C Delivery Addresses D Deliveries Into Defence Storage And Distribution Agency Bicester and Donnington (DSDA) E One Off Special Items or Services F Key Performance Indicators G Procedure for P2P Demand Orders H Procedure for Non-P2P Demand Orders i UPHOLSTERY AND SOFT FURNISHINGS STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS – MEDGS/0011 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Statement of Requirements (StOR) sets out the Medical and General Supplies team's (M&GS) requirements for the supply of Textiles, Upholstery and soft furnishings requirements. 1.2 The Contractor shall supply the Articles and Services detailed in the SOR, as they are ordered by authorised Demanding Authorities listed at Annex B of this StOR and in the Master Database. The majority of demands under this Contract will be direct for the customers detailed in the Master Database. Demands for stock into the main delivery points will form the lesser part of the contract. As well as timely delivery of the Articles to the Authority, the Contractor must endeavour to achieve reductions in Article
    [Show full text]
  • Devonport Royal Dockyard (Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd and HM Naval Base Devonport)
    Title of document Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) Quarterly Site Report for Devonport Royal Dockyard (Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd and HM Naval Base Devonport) Report for period 1 July to 30 September 2015 Foreword This report is issued as part of ONR's commitment to make information about inspection and regulatory activities relating to the above sites available to the public. Reports are distributed quarterly to members for the Local Liaison Committee and are also available on the ONR website (http://www.onr.org.uk/llc/). Site inspectors from ONR usually attend Devonport Local Liaison Committee meetings and will respond to any questions raised there. Any person wishing to inquire about matters covered by this report should contact ONR. Template Ref: ONR-DOC-TEMP-008 Revision 3 Page 1 of 8 Quarterly Site Report for Devonport – QTR 3 2015 TRIM Ref: 2015/XXXXXX TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INSPECTIONS .................................................................................................................... 3 2 ROUTINE MATTERS .......................................................................................................... 3 3 NON-ROUTINE MATTERS ................................................................................................. 7 4 REGULATORY ACTIVITY ................................................................................................... 7 5 NEWS FROM ONR ............................................................................................................. 8 6 CONTACTS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Colours of the Fleet
    THE COLOURS OF THE FLEET TCOF BRITISH & BRITISH DERIVED ENSIGNS ~ THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE WORLDWIDE LIST OF ALL FLAGS AND ENSIGNS, PAST AND PRESENT, WHICH BEAR THE UNION FLAG IN THE CANTON “Build up the highway clear it of stones lift up an ensign over the peoples” Isaiah 62 vv 10 Created and compiled by Malcolm Farrow OBE President of the Flag Institute Edited and updated by David Prothero 15 January 2015 © 1 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Page 3 Introduction Page 5 Definition of an Ensign Page 6 The Development of Modern Ensigns Page 10 Union Flags, Flagstaffs and Crowns Page 13 A Brief Summary Page 13 Reference Sources Page 14 Chronology Page 17 Numerical Summary of Ensigns Chapter 2 British Ensigns and Related Flags in Current Use Page 18 White Ensigns Page 25 Blue Ensigns Page 37 Red Ensigns Page 42 Sky Blue Ensigns Page 43 Ensigns of Other Colours Page 45 Old Flags in Current Use Chapter 3 Special Ensigns of Yacht Clubs and Sailing Associations Page 48 Introduction Page 50 Current Page 62 Obsolete Chapter 4 Obsolete Ensigns and Related Flags Page 68 British Isles Page 81 Commonwealth and Empire Page 112 Unidentified Flags Page 112 Hypothetical Flags Chapter 5 Exclusions. Page 114 Flags similar to Ensigns and Unofficial Ensigns Chapter 6 Proclamations Page 121 A Proclamation Amending Proclamation dated 1st January 1801 declaring what Ensign or Colours shall be borne at sea by Merchant Ships. Page 122 Proclamation dated January 1, 1801 declaring what ensign or colours shall be borne at sea by merchant ships. 2 CHAPTER 1 Introduction The Colours of The Fleet 2013 attempts to fill a gap in the constitutional and historic records of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth by seeking to list all British and British derived ensigns which have ever existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4: Conclusions and Recommendations & Appendices
    Twentieth Century Naval Dockyards Devonport and Portsmouth: Characterisation Report PART FOUR CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The final focus of this report is to develop the local, national and international contexts of the two dockyards to highlight specific areas of future research. Future discussion of Devonport and Portsmouth as distinct designed landscapes would coherently organise the many strands identified in this report. The Museum of London Archaeology Portsmouth Harbour Hinterland Project carried out for Heritage England (2015) is a promising step in this direction. It is emphasised that this study is just a start. By delivering the aim and objectives, it has indicated areas of further fruitful research. Project aim: to characterise the development of the active naval dockyards at Devonport and Portsmouth, and the facilities within the dockyard boundaries at their maximum extent during the twentieth century, through library, archival and field surveys, presented and analysed in a published report, with a database of documentary and building reports. This has been delivered through Parts 1-4 and Appendices 2-4. Project objectives 1 To provide an overview of the twentieth century development of English naval dockyards, related to historical precedent, national foreign policy and naval strategy. 2 To address the main chronological development phases to accommodate new types of vessels and technologies of the naval dockyards at Devonport and Portsmouth. 3 To identify the major twentieth century naval technological revolutions which affected British naval dockyards. 4 To relate the main chronological phases to topographic development of the yards and changing technological and strategic needs, and identify other significant factors. 5 To distinguish which buildings are typical of the twentieth century naval dockyards and/or of unique interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Neptune's Might: Amphibious Forces in Normandy
    Neptune’s Might: Amphibious Forces in Normandy A Coast Guard LCVP landing craft crew prepares to take soldiers to Omaha Beach, June 6, 1944 Photo 26-G-2349. U.S. Coast Guard Photo, Courtesy Naval History and Heritage Command By Michael Kern Program Assistant, National History Day 1 “The point was that we on the scene knew for sure that we could substitute machines for lives and that if we could plague and smother the enemy with an unbearable weight of machinery in the months to follow, hundreds of thousands of our young men whose expectancy of survival would otherwise have been small could someday walk again through their own front doors.” - Ernie Pyle, Brave Men 2 What is National History Day? National History Day is a non-profit organization which promotes history education for secondary and elementary education students. The program has grown into a national program since its humble beginnings in Cleveland, Ohio in 1974. Today over half a million students participate in National History Day each year, encouraged by thousands of dedicated teachers. Students select a historical topic related to a theme chosen each year. They conduct primary and secondary research on their chosen topic through libraries, archives, museums, historic sites, and interviews. Students analyze and interpret their sources before presenting their work in original papers, exhibits, documentaries, websites, or performances. Students enter their projects in contests held each spring at the local, state, and national level where they are evaluated by professional historians and educators. The program culminates in the Kenneth E. Behring National Contest, held on the campus of the University of Maryland at College Park each June.
    [Show full text]