Report and Recommendations of the Scottish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report and Recommendations of the Scottish REFLECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH COMMEMORATIONS PANEL WW100 SCOTLAND REPORT 2019 Contents Foreword Page 5 Summary of Recommendations Page 6 Chapter One The Panel and its Purpose Page 7 Chapter Two The Commemorative Programme Page 9 Chapter Three Partnerships Page 11 Chapter Four The use of Social Media Page 13 Chapter Five WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM ALL TH1S? Page 14 Annex A Panel Purpose and Objectives Page 16 Annex B The Scottish Commemorations Panel (SCP) Page 17 Annex C The Scottish Commemorative Programme Page 19 Annex D Historic Document booklets Page 22 3 Foreword Since being appointed to serve in early 2013 the Scottish Commemorations Panel has, throughout the commemorative period, been asking of themselves and of others the telling strapline question of “WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM ALL TH1S?” As the WW100 Scotland commemorations draw to a close – with the presentation of Certificates to Primary and Secondary schools the length and breadth of Scotland, and the laying up of a WW100 Scotland Time Capsule to be opened on 4 August 2114 and the concluding WW100 Scotland Exhibition and Art Installation in the Scottish Parliament – our thoughts have inevitably and inexorably turned to asking the question “WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM ALL TH1S?” We trust that this report, comprising 44 meetings and the organisation of 17 major events here in Scotland and overseas, alongside the supervision and encouragement of countless others across Scotland, will prove of encouragement and benefit to our successors in forthcoming commemorative events and years. Perhaps 3 main themes have emerged and sustained us in our work on behalf of those ‘who for our tomorrow gave their today’. Firstly, we have learned how important it is to use memory as a tool for the living. Secondly, we have learned that those things which have or do divide us are as nothing compared to that which unites us in our nation, across the United Kingdom and throughout the world. Thirdly, we have realised that whilst attitudes may change certain values remain the same and that there is nothing in life nor death nor in things present nor to come that can separate us from that indominable spirit of selfless service and all those who served and gave their lives that we might live. Indeed, I would be confident that if any member of the Scottish Commemorations Panel and all the countless numbers of Scots and others who have been involved in WW100 Scotland were to be asked to describe their feelings at the end of the commemorative period, then words such as ‘a privilege and an honour to serve’ would readily come to their lips. The Revd Professor Norman Drummond CBE FRSE Chair, Scottish Commemorations Panel/WW100 Scotland 5 Summary of Recommendations Chapter One: The Panel and its Purpose 1. The 13 Panel Members, with Advisers and Tri-Service representation, covered a good and wide range of interests. The Panel recommend that there should be flexibility in the work programme to involve others in Think Tanks for specific events. 2. The regularity of the venue, time and day of the week for Panel meetings was helpful for Panel Members in planning their own diaries, particularly as the meeting dates for each year were set in January. 3. Clearer understanding of the time commitment from Panel Members must be considered at the time of appointment, particularly for the Chair. 4. The quarterly meetings which the Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Tourism and External Affairs had with the Chair were very helpful. The meetings were planned so the Chair could provide details on Programme developments and to hear her views and report back to the Panel. Chapter Two: The Commemorative Programme 1. The criteria for inclusion in the Scottish Commemorative Programme was based on two factors: battles in which a significant number of Scots were involved; or events which happened within Scotland or Scottish waters.This worked well and ensured a good geographical spread of commemorative events across Scotland. 2. The Panel recognised that there were many events being organised at local level, within schools, at UK level and across Europe and that support and attendance, where appropriate, generates good relations. Chapter Three: Partnerships 1. Building strong relationships from the outset is important to get ‘buy-in’ across communities and organisations. 2. The UK Advisory Committee, which included all 4 Home Nations, is essential to make sure there is no conflict of events and also to aid delivery of UK wide events. 3. Earlier engagement with the Ministry of Defence to attain a commitment at the outset to support a Programme of events in Scotland would have aided the planning of the Programme. Chapter Four: The use of Social Media 1. There must be clarity of the purpose of a website and awareness of the time and financial resource required. 2. Using the website as a portal for relevant information and resources would be preferable to the endeavour of creating unique content. 3. The use of social media must play a key role in disseminating information including planned social media campaigns linked to specific events. Chapter Five: WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM ALL TH1S? 1. From the outset, the Panel’s ‘strapline’ has been ‘WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM ALL TH1S?’ This has proved to be an exceptionally apt and useful phrase and consideration of a meaningful ‘strapline’ is strongly recommended. 2. The Panel consider the Historic Document series of books to be a key legacy from the Programme and would encourage others to consider something similar. 3. Use of the Arts, as with Education, as a medium for delivering the Programme should be given full consideration. 6 Chapter One: The Panel and its Purpose In November 2011 Dr Andrew Murrison, MP for South West Wiltshire, was appointed by the Prime Minister of the day, the Rt Hon David Cameron, as his Special Representative for the Centenary Commemorations of the Great War. Dr Murrison was to be supported by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) as the lead Whitehall Department. A small select working group with representatives of key departments and organisations was set up and Special Representatives of the Devolved Administrations of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales were invited to attend. The 4 Home Nations each committed to jointly support a UK Programme of commemorations for the key battles and events of the War, whilst determining their own Programme commemorating events of particular significance to their own countries. In Scotland, Fiona Hyslop, Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Tourism and External Affairs, was asked to be the Scottish Cabinet lead on a Programme for Scotland’s commemorations. The Cabinet Secretary appointed Professor Norman Drummond as Adviser to act as strategic lead for the commemorations and to chair a Panel of expert advisers representing education, media, historians, clergy, military organisations and representatives of the Armed Forces. To ensure there would be no conflict between the UK Programme and that proposed for Scotland, Professor Drummond became a member of Dr Murrison’s working group, the UK WW1 Advisory Group, as Special Representative for Scotland. The role of the Scottish Commemorations Panel would be to assist the Chair in delivery of his remit to: • Provide advice, strategic oversight and challenge to the Scottish Government’s Commemorative Programme; • Monitor the delivery of work Programmes; • Ensure the Programme follows the purpose and objectives agreed by Scottish Ministers and monitor any risks to delivery. (See Annex A) Professor Drummond, with assistance from the Scottish Government, established a 13 strong Panel of leading people from the key areas identified. The Panel was constituted as an Advisory Panel and did not have the ability to make grant payments. The budget for the Programme, which included expenses for the Panel, was administered by the Scottish Government. One of the first steps taken in organising the planning of events was establishing ‘ThinkTanks’. These generally comprised of groups of 4 to 5 Panel Members, and sometimes ‘guest’ members, who considered the delivery of an event in detail before reporting back to the Panel for approval and agreement. Over the Commemorative period, the Panel largely remained the same with only 2 Members leaving and 2 new Members joining. The Panel has also benefitted from being joined by Special Advisers on Church and Interfaith Matters, Major Events and senior representatives from the Tri-Services. (Full list at Annex B). Support for the Panel was provided by two Scottish Government officials and additional help was provided by a member of Royal British Legion Scotland staff and a Royal Marine Reserve Captain. Recommendations 1. The 13 Panel Members (i.e. the Chair plus 12 Members), with Advisers and Tri-Service representation, covered a good range of interests. The Panel recommend that there should be flexibility in the work programme to involve others in Think Tanks for specific events. Although there was no representative young person on the Panel a wide and considerate view of the programme and its audiences was taken. The Panel recognise that it would be nigh impossible to include representatives of all interest groups so it was helpful to involve interest groups in Think Tanks. Think Tanks were led by a Panel Member and were generally around 4 to 5 Members strong. Panel Members were invited to join a Think Tank if their area of interest was relevant or could volunteer to be a member if they had a personal interest. External experts were also invited to join Think Tanks. 7 For example, The War in the Air Think Tank was led by one Panel member and attended by the Panel’s RAF Adviser, other members represented RAF Cadets, a Curator of an air heritage centre, an author of books on the progression of the war in the air and RAF serving officers from Leuchars Air Base.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Chili Feed and Heritage Fair
    WWI Razzle-Dazzle Odd Fellows Cabins Tricked German Subs Get Needed TLC After heavy losses of ships in the Historicorps in cooperation with North Atlantic during World War DCHS complete critical first phases I, British planners razzle-dazzled of stabilization work needed to save German U-boat commanders. the four cabins. See Page 2 See Page 3 The Homesteader Deschutes County Historical Society Newsletter – November 2017 ANNUAL CHILI FEED AND HERITAGE FAIR It’s time for the Annual Chili Feed and Heritage Fair, last winter, who doesn’t want to win one of those? November 10-11 at the Deschutes Historical Museum. Last year we launched a small genealogy research Millie’s Chili with Rastovich Farms Barley Beef can’t table—this year, with support from the Deschutes be beat—a family tradition that has helped support the Cultural Coalition, we are expanding our genealogy museum for over thirty years. A special time to visit session to a full two-day Heritage Fair designed to jump the museum and catch up with other members and start your genealogy research. volunteers. The Bake Sale features tasty treats from our members, homemade jams and jellies, and things you Our featured presenter is Lisa McCullough, a genetic can’t find anywhere else. The Raffle is lining up great genealogy researcher and lecturer. Commercials local staycations, nights on the town, the ever fought promise ancestral discoveries through simple DNA tests—swab your cheek and send it off, but what are over table at History Pub and—a snow blower! After -- continued on page 4 The Homesteader: Volume 43; No.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM Vol 3, No 1
    PRISM❖ Vol. 3, no. 1 12/2011 PRISM Vol. 3, no. 1 3, no. Vol. ❖ 12/2011 www.ndu.edu A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS PRISM ABOUT CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS (CCO) CCO WAS ESTABLISHED TO: PRISM is published by the National Defense University Press for the Center for ❖❖ Serve as an information clearinghouse and knowledge Enhancing the U.S. Government’s Ability to manager for complex operations training and education, PUBLISHER Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners on complex and Prepare for Complex Operations acting as a central repository for information on areas Dr. Hans Binnendijk integrated national security operations; reconstruction and nation-building; such as training and curricula, training and education pro- CCO, a center within the Institute for National Strategic relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and vider institutions, complex operations events, and subject EDITOR AND RESEARCH DIRECTOR Studies at National Defense University, links U.S. education to transform America’s security and development apparatus to meet matter experts Government education and training institutions, including Michael Miklaucic tomorrow’s challenges better while promoting freedom today. related centers of excellence, lessons learned programs, ❖❖ Develop a complex operations training and education com- and academia, to foster unity of effort in reconstruction munity of practice to catalyze innovation and development DEVELOPMENTAL EDITOR and stability operations, counterinsurgency, and irregular of new knowledge, connect members for networking, share Melanne A. Civic, Esq. COMMUNICATIONS warfare—collectively called “complex operations.” existing knowledge, and cultivate foundations of trust and The Department of Defense, with support from the habits of collaboration across the community Constructive comments and contributions are important to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Annual Review PDF 2016-17
    Annual Review 2016/17 Pushing at the frontiers of Knowledge Portrait of Dr Henry Odili Nwume (Brasenose) by Sarah Jane Moon – see The Full Picture, page 17. FOREWORD 2016/17 has been a memorable year for the country and for our University. In the ever-changing and deeply uncertain world around us, the University of Oxford continues to attract the most talented students and the most talented academics from across the globe. They convene here, as they have always done, to learn, to push at the frontiers of knowledge and to improve the world in which we find ourselves. One of the highlights of the past twelve months was that for the second consecutive year we were named the top university in the world by the Times Higher Education Global Rankings. While it is reasonable to be sceptical of the precise placements in these rankings, it is incontrovertible that we are universally acknowledged to be one of the greatest universities in the world. This is a privilege, a responsibility and a challenge. Other highlights include the opening of the world’s largest health big data institute, the Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, and the launch of OSCAR – the Oxford Suzhou Centre for Advanced Research – a major new research centre in Suzhou near Shanghai. In addition, the Ashmolean’s success in raising £1.35 million to purchase King Alfred’s coins, which included support from over 800 members of the public, was a cause for celebration. The pages that follow detail just some of the extraordinary research being conducted here on perovskite solar cells, indestructible tardigrades and driverless cars.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utility of Military Force and Public Understanding in Today's Britain
    EUROPE HEW STRACHAN, RUTH HARRIS The Utility of Military Force and Public Understanding in Today’s Britain For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA213-1 The Global Strategic Partnership (GSP), a consortium of research, academic and industry organisations that is led by RAND Europe, provides ongoing analytical support to the UK Ministry of Defence. Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. RAND Europe is a not-for-profit research organisation that helps to improve policy and decision making through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.randeurope.org Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Humanities Review Volume 3 Translation: Comparative Perspectives Article 14 (Spring 2009)
    Comparative Humanities Review Volume 3 Translation: Comparative Perspectives Article 14 (Spring 2009) 2009 Comparative Humanities Review Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/chr Recommended Citation (2009) "Comparative Humanities Review," Comparative Humanities Review: Vol. 3, Article 14. Available at: http://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/chr/vol3/iss1/14 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Humanities Review by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Translation: Comparative Perspectives Vol. 3 (Spring 2009) Edited by A. Joseph McMullen The Comparative Humanities Review 3 Translation: Comparative Perspectives Edited by A. Joseph McMullen A Student Publication of The Comparative Humanities Department Bucknell University Lewisburg, PA The Comparative Humanities Review is a student-run journal dedicated to the support and distribution of undergraduate scholarship in the humanities. We welcome submissions that are comparative in nature and employ any discipline in the humanities. Contributions should be written when the author is completing his or her undergraduate degree. For more information, contact the Editor-in-Chief by visiting the Web site below. Access the journal online: http://www.orgs.bucknell.edu/comp_hum_rev/index.html Copyright (c) 2009 All rights reserved. Cover: Preparations to burn the body of William Tyndale from John Foxe’s Book of Martyrs Source: Lacey Baldwin Smith, The Horizon Book of the Elizabethan World (New York: American Heritage, 1967), 73. 3 Translation: Comparative Perspectives Contents Translation and Film: Slang, Dialects, Accents and Multiple Languages / Allison Rittmayer … 1 Philosophy, Abstract Thought, and the Dilemmas of Philosophy / James Rickard … 13 The Great War Seen Through the Comparative Lens / Steven L.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel—Drifting Towards Disaster? BRONWEN MADDOX
    What if football had different rules? p20 ISSUE 220 | JULY 2014 www.prospectmagazine.co.uk JULY 2014 | £4.95 Israel—drifting towards disaster? BRONWEN MADDOX ISRAEL—DRIFTING TOWARDS DISASTER? ISRAEL—DRIFTING TOWARDS Plus Ed Miliband’s real problem PETER KELLNER How Germany remembers WW1 HEW STRACHAN The man who saved the world STEPHANIE FLANDERS Surviving teleportation JIM HOLT Why you should move to Manchester JONATHAN DERBYSHIRE Also Rebecca Front, Christine Ockrent, Sebastian Smee, AC Grayling, Ramachandra Guha, Jonathan Portes C PROSPECT JULY Foreword Democracy’s great test 25 Sackville Street, London W1S 3AX Publishing 020 7255 1281 Editorial 020 7255 1344 Fax 020 3031 1191 Email [email protected] [email protected] Website www.prospectmagazine.co.uk Editorial Editor and Chief Executive Bronwen Maddox Editor-at-Large David Goodhart Deputy Editor Jay Elwes The biggest test of democracy is whether it produces Managing Editor Jonathan Derbyshire Arts & Books Editor David Wolf governments that can solve a country’s greatest problems. Creative Director David Killen Production Editor Jessica Abrahams Budget defi cits, in the case of Europe; Hindu-Muslim clashes, Digital Editor Serena Kutchinsky Assistant Digital Editor Josh Lowe in the case of India (p46); a vulnerable economy and a failure Publishing to reach a deal with the Palestinians, in the case of Israel President & co-founder Derek Coombs Commercial Director Alex Stevenson (p24). Right now, the best-known thing that Jean-Claude Publishing Consultant
    [Show full text]
  • The Interviews
    Jeff Schechtman Interviews December 1995 to April 2017 2017 Marcus du Soutay 4/10/17 Mark Zupan Inside Job: How Government Insiders Subvert the Public Interest 4/6/17 Johnathan Letham More Alive and Less Lonely: On Books and Writers 4/6/17 Ali Almossawi Bad Choices: How Algorithms Can Help You Think Smarter and Live Happier 4/5/17 Steven Vladick Prof. of Law at UT Austin 3/31/17 Nick Middleton An Atals of Countries that Don’t Exist 3/30/16 Hope Jahren Lab Girl 3/28/17 Mary Otto Theeth: The Story of Beauty, Inequality and the Struggle for Oral Health 3/28/17 Lawrence Weschler Waves Passing in the Night: Walter Murch in the Land of the Astrophysicists 3/28/17 Mark Olshaker Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs 3/24/17 Geoffrey Stone Sex and Constitution 3/24/17 Bill Hayes Insomniac City: New York, Oliver and Me 3/21/17 Basharat Peer A Question of Order: India, Turkey and the Return of the Strongmen 3/21/17 Cass Sunstein #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media 3/17/17 Glenn Frankel High Noon: The Hollywood Blacklist and the Making of an American Classic 3/15/17 Sloman & Fernbach The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Think Alone 3/15/17 Subir Chowdhury The Difference: When Good Enough Isn’t Enough 3/14/17 Peter Moskowitz How To Kill A City: Gentrification, Inequality and the Fight for the Neighborhood 3/14/17 Bruce Cannon Gibney A Generation of Sociopaths: How the Baby Boomers Betrayed America 3/10/17 Pam Jenoff The Orphan's Tale: A Novel 3/10/17 L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017
    The Saltire September 2017 Welcome! . to this, the September edition of The Saltire - the newsletter of the Saint Andrew Society of Western Australia. This is the quiet time of year for the Society, with many of our members taking off to the northern hemisphere, visiting friends and family in Scotland and elsewhere, or just ‘visiting the sites’. It's for the latter reason that I find myself sitting writing this in a hotel in San Franciso at 4:30am, wondering if my body-clock is ever going to be the same again! (We left Perth at 6:15am on a Monday morning and were in our hotel in SF by lunch time the same day – how does that work?!) There being less Society business to write about, I intend to include some material of a more general nature in this edition, which I hope you might find interesting. In this edition: • Society business since the last Saltire. • Upcoming events. • ‘Tommy’s Honour’. • Patrick Grant – the portrait of a rebel. • The ‘Tuscania’ – an Islay ship-wreck. Page 1 of 19 The Saltire September 2017 Society Business Weekend Away Since the Chieftain’s Ceilidh in May, there has only been one event, which was the ‘Weekend Away’. Last year’s event was held in the somewhat tired surroundings of the old El Caballo Blanco resort in the hills east of Perth. This year, we travelled further afield, to Quindanning, a 'one horse town' (actually, a 'three house town'!) a little to the south of the enormous gold mining operation around Boddington. While it’s a bit of a hike down to Quindanning, the effort was worth it.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the United States and United Kingdom Smallpox Epidemics (1901–5) – the Special Relationship That Tested Public Health Strategies for Disease Control
    Med. Hist. (2020), vol. 64(1), pp. 1–31. c The Author 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press 2019 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/mdh.2019.74 An Analysis of the United States and United Kingdom Smallpox Epidemics (1901–5) – The Special Relationship that Tested Public Health Strategies for Disease Control BERNARD BRABIN 1,2,3 * 1Clinical Division, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK 2Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, UK 3Global Child Health Group, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract: At the end of the nineteenth century, the northern port of Liverpool had become the second largest in the United Kingdom. Fast transatlantic steamers to Boston and other American ports exploited this route, increasing the risk of maritime disease epidemics. The 1901–3 epidemic in Liverpool was the last serious smallpox outbreak in Liverpool and was probably seeded from these maritime contacts, which introduced a milder form of the disease that was more difficult to trace because of its long incubation period and occurrence of undiagnosed cases. The characteristics of these epidemics in Boston and Liverpool are described and compared with outbreaks in New York, Glasgow and London between 1900 and 1903. Public health control strategies, notably medical inspection, quarantine and vaccination, differed between the two countries and in both settings were inconsistently applied, often for commercial reasons or due to public unpopularity.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper
    Discussion Paper for the Inception Workshop on “The Changing Character of Conflict Platform: Understanding, Tracing and Forecasting Change across Time, Space and Cultures” held on 26 May 2017 at the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford Dr Annette Idler, University of Oxford Background: a Transformative Approach This paper fleshes out the ideas that lie at the core of the project “The Changing Character of Conflict Platform: Understanding, Tracing and Forecasting Change across Time, Space and Cultures”, funded by the Funded by the UK Research Council’s Partnership for Conflict, Crime and Security Research.1 These ideas are informed by the project’s overarching aim: to reduce the threats to human security that arise from armed conflict. In particular, the paper discusses the objectives set to work towards this aim and the questions that need to be tackled in order to achieve them. The first objective is to transform knowledge on conflict into a more comprehensive understanding of its changing character by accounting for change across time, space and cultures. The second objective is to use this distinctive knowledge to grasp the dynamism and non-linear nature of change in armed conflict. Achieving these objectives cannot occur from one single mind-set or perspective. It requires a collective effort that brings together varying disciplinary, methodological and epistemological approaches, all united in the aspiration of transformative, or emancipatory, scholarship - of contributing towards a more secure world. The purpose of this paper is therefore not to provide an exhaustive account of the debates and works that shape a comprehensive understanding of change in conflict.
    [Show full text]