DOCSLIB.ORG

Peter Sutherland Takes Over

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GATT Newsletter No 100 July 1993 Peter Sutherland takes over t a Special Session of the Contracting he new GATT Director-General, Mr. AParties in Geneva on 9 June, Mr. TER TPeter Sutherland, promised to "leave Peter Sutherland (Ireland) was appointed no stone unturned" in trying to bring the as the next Director-General of GATT. Uruguay Round negotiations to a bal­ Mr. Sutherland, whose appointment was anced conclusion before the end of the decided by consensus, took office on l year. He made this pledge after the Trade July 1993. He will serve for an initial Negotiations Committee, which oversees period of two years. the Round, elected him by acclamation on "The dedication and the ability of Mr. 5 July as TNC Chairman at officials level Sutherland as a national and international to succeed the former Director-General, public servant as well as in the private Mr. Arthur Dunkel. sector will ensure that the helm of the Mr. Sutherland was elected Chairman GATT and the Uruguay Round will be in in his personal capacity. As Director- good hands," said Mr. Arthur Dunkel, the General, he already heads the Group of outgoing Director-General, in welcoming Negotiations on Goods. The TNC over­ the decision. sees negotiations in both trade in goods and trade in services. In a statement to the press, following Director-General Sutherland., The Chairman of the Contracting Par­ the decision on his appointment, Mr. and his predecessors: Sutherland said: ties, Ambassador B.K. Zutshi, who in­ itially chaired the meeting, noted that one principal criterion of GATT members in their search for a new Director-General The immediate priority is Sir Eric concluding the Round was finding a person who had the ability Wyndham- and the capacity to facilitate an early suc­ My appointment a's Director-General White, cess to the Round. "In Mr. Sutherland, we brings with it an extraordinary responsi­ 1948-68 have found that person," Ambassador bility and an enormous personal chal­ Zutshi said. lenge. In many ways the GATT system Referring to the G-7 Meeting, Mr. holds the key to the future world pros­ Sutherland said "the new days would be perity and a way out of the pain of unem­ of considerable importance to the conclu­ ployment which so many nations face sion of the Uruguay Round". But "what­ today. ever results from the Tokyo Summit, the Above all, it is a multilateral system Mr. Olivier function of concluding the Round is with looking after the interests of countries, Long, us." He added: "one of the defining mo­ large and small, developed and develo­ 1968-80 ments of the latter half of this century ping. None of the demands of my new job would be bringing the Uruguay Round to can be more important than safeguarding a successful conclusion -1 gladly take this every one of the varying interests repre­ responsibility, and I gladly share it with sented among GATT's 111 members. you." Clearly, the immediate priority must be The new Chairman cautioned that he to help the participants of the Uruguay- was "at best a facilitator - not a magician". Round secure a quick, comprehensive and "It would be impossible to organize deals far-reaching conclusion to their negotia­ Mr. Arthur if the deal-makers - that is, you, the gov­ tions. The meeting of the G7 in Tokyo will Dunkel, ernments - are not ready or willing; our be crucial - but we will need deeds, not 1980-93 partnership will have to be, therefore, a Continued on page 10 Continued on page 12 GATT FOCUS June Council Russia applies for GATT membership Panel rules against EC members'restrictions on bananas ussia's formal application to join the The former Soviet Union was origin­ the type of agreement described by the RGATT was hailed by many contract­ ally a member of a preparatory committee EEC in the Panel's proceedings, but ing parties, at the 16-17 June meeting of appointed in 1946 by the UN Economic only from an action of the Contracting the Council, as a contribution to the and Social Council to draft the charter of Parties under Article XXV (on joint universalization of the GATT and an in­ a world trade organization. However, it action by the Contracting Parties). The dication of its relevance to reforming chose not to attend the meetings of the Panel recommended that the Contract­ countries. committee, whose members became the ing Parties request the EC to bring the Russia's Minister for External Econ­ founding contracting parties to the GATT preference into conformity with the omic Relations. Mr. Sergei Glaziev. told in 1948. In May 1990. the Council granted General Agreement unless, in accord­ the Council that the importance of GATT observer status to the former Soviet ance with the provisions of Article membership for his country w as shown by Union. In February 1992, the Council XXV. the EEC were authorized to the fact that President Boris Yeltsin had Chairman announced that the former maintain this preference. personally handed the accession request USSR's GATT observer status would be Costa Rica, speaking on behalf of the to the GATT Director-General, Mr. Art­ continued through the Russian Feder­ complainants, urged the immediate adop­ hur Dunkel. in Moscow on 11 June. Mr. ation. tion of the panel report, which it said Glaziev said the request was a logical part resulted from a sound and logical analysis of Russia's market-economy reforms, and EC member states' import of the import regimes in question. It said a necessary step in Russia's integration restrictions on bananas that compliance with the panel's recom­ into the world trading system. He said that mendations would demonstrate that the after several years of economic reforms. The panel that examined the complaint by GATT dispute-settlement system was a Russia had become an open market. Mr. Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala. Nica­ true guarantee for the development of in­ Glaziev stressed that Russia's accession ragua and Venezuela against the EC mem­ ternational trade relations based on multi­ would present trading opportunities for ber states' import regimes for bananas lateral rules. both Russia and the contracting parties, presented its report to the Council. This The EC said it had received the report and would contribute to world trade panel was established by the Council on only recently, and was still analysing its growth. 10 February 1993 under the expedited legal implications, particularly the part The United States described Russia's procedures of the 1966 Decision for dis­ dealing with Community's trade pref­ decision as "a momentous one" for both putes involving developing countries, the erences under the Lomé Convention. It the country and GATT, adding that the first time the Decision was used to estab­ said this part presented a major problem accession process could contribute to the lish a GATT panel. The panel submitted not only for the EC but also for other construction and maintenance of a firm its report to the parties within nine weeks countries that had non-reciprocal pref­ and comprehensive framework for Rus­ of its constitution - faster than any other erential trade agreements with developing sia's future trade-led economic develop­ previous GATT panel. countries. The Community said it would ment. The European Community said The panel reached the following con­ be prepared for a substantial discussion of accession was an essential step for Rus­ clusions: the matter at the next Council meeting in sia's reform process, to which it had been • The quantitative restrictions main­ July. making significant contributions. tained by France, Italy, Portugal, Spain Many ACP contracting parties de­ In welcoming Russia's application, and the United Kingdom on imports of nounced the panel's findings. Jamaica, Norway, speaking on behalf of the Nordic bananas were inconsistent with Article emphasizing the critical economic im­ countries, pointed out that the working XI: 1 (this Article refers to the general portance of banana exports to many ACP party process would necessarily take elimination of quantitative restrictions) members, maintained that the panel had some time to be completed. Japan under­ and were not justified by Article overstepped its mandate. Saint Lucia ob­ lined that an acceding country should XI:2(c)(i). Article XXIV (on customs jected to the panel's conclusions with re­ have a system compatible with the unions and free-trade areas), or the spect to the Lomé Convention, arguing General Agreement, and hoped that Rus­ existing legislation clauses in the proto­ that the EC-ACP arrangement had been sia would be fully prepared for the work­ cols through which these EEC member the most successful example of North- ing party exercise. States had become contracting parties. South cooperation. St. Vincent and the Brazil said Russia's accession would The Panel recommended that the Con­ Grenadines questioned why the EC affirm GATT as a truly universal agree­ tracting Parties request the EEC to bring should be condemned for extending a ment. Malaysia, speaking on behalf of the these restrictions into conformity with helping hand to some of the poorest coun­ ASEAN contracting parties, said Russia's the General Agreement. tries in the world. Dominica said the panel move was a sign of world confidence in • The tariff preference accorded by the findings had incited banana farmers to the GATT. Hungary said accession would EEC to imports of bananas originating vigorous public protests. add "a catalyst to Russia's moves towards in ACP countries was inconsistent with A number of Latin-American countries an open market economy". Article I (on most-favoured-nation urged the adoption of the report.
Recommended publications
  • Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword

    Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword

    Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword THIS BOOK ON THE HISTORY AND WORKS OF ART of the Centre William Rappard of the works, donated by countries and labour would not have been possible ten years ago. The reason for this is simple: despite unions during the ILO era, had been either the building’s rich past, illustrious occupants and proud appearance, it was a little concealed or removed. In restoring these works, antiquated and not particularly well known or even well liked. Located in a magnificent the WTO took on an identity that was not strictly park on the shore of Lake Geneva, with a spectacular view of the Alps, it has a speaking its own, but of which its staff and somewhat turbulent past. Members have become proud. AS THE FIRST BUILDING IN GENEVA built to house an international organization, THE WORKS OF ART PRESENTED IN THIS BOOK , many of which have been the Centre William Rappard, named after a leading Swiss diplomat, was originally given a new lease of life by the WTO, display a wide variety of styles and techniques. the headquarters of the International Labour Office (ILO). The ILO left the building Many of them represent labour in its various forms – an allusion, of course, to the in 1940 during the Second World War, but later moved back in 1948, only to leave activities of the ILO, the building’s original occupant. Other works, such as Eduardo for good in 1975 when the Centre William Rappard was handed over to its new Chicharro’s “Pygmalion”, are more unusual.
  • Rencontre Européenne Nb. 8 Peter Sutherland

    Rencontre Européenne Nb. 8 Peter Sutherland

    41, boulevard des Capucines - 75002 Paris – France Tel. : +33 1 44 58 97 97/98 - Fax : +33 1 44 58 97 99 Site : www.notre-europe.eu - email : [email protected] RENCONTRE EUROPÉENNE NB. 8 PETER SUTHERLAND JUNE 2008 ‘To be truly Irish we have to be European first’ ‘We need the European Union to bind us to other people’ Peter Sutherland The Spire and statue of Jim Larkin on O’Connell Street Interview with Peter Sutherland A fervently pro-European Irishman, Peter Sutherland has held important political mandates in his country, as well as at the European and international level. He was appointed Attorney General of Ireland in the governments of Garret FitzGerald, before becoming European Commissioner for Competition in the first Delors Commission (1985-89). He subsequently became Director General of GATT (now WTO). Peter Sutherland is currently serving as Chairman of BP, of Goldman Sachs International and is the UN Special Representative for Migration. We met him at his house in Dublin, prior to the Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. What made you such a convinced European? From a very early stage, as a university student already, I was a committed European. We could see at first hand in this country the enormous suffering created by extreme nationalism which in turn was a reaction to injustice. Nationalism – often combined with religion, as was the case in Northern Ireland – has often led to conflict throughout history. According to one opinion poll I saw years ago the Irish are the proudest people of all; they have the greatest sense of their own nationality.
  • P111,3 Peter Sutherland.Indd

    P111,3 Peter Sutherland.Indd

    UNCTAD XII Free trade and the global economy INTERVIEW WITH PETER SUTHERLAND CHAIRMAN, GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL AND CHAIRMAN, BP PLC Can global free trade ever benefit both the do not believe provide the same security for global developing and developed worlds equally? trade and which will create difficulties in terms of the Well over a billion people have been lifted out of poverty mixed bag of access arrangements that will follow, globally in the last ten years, out of a total population of particularly for small and medium sized industries. just over five billion. That’s never happened before in Such agreements do not provide the same security or the history of mankind and it has come about, primarily have the same authority as the WTO, which in effect in Asia, as a benefit of globalisation and free trade. As for provides a quasi-judicial mechanism for adjudicating those who have not been beneficiaries of global trade, it is on disputes with global authority. Whereas with most not that global trade agreements are negatively affecting bilateral arrangements, particularly between the them, it is that globalisation is passing them by. Why? developed and the developing countries, the cards are PETER SUTHERLAND Because they neither have the physical nor the human stacked in favour of the developed countries because of is Chairman of BP plc infrastructure, in terms of education and so on, to enable their enhanced power of negotiation, and the absence since 1997 and Chairman them to be part of it. After all globalisation really is, and of a credible adjudication mechanism.
  • Understanding the WTO

    Understanding the WTO

    The WTO Third edition Previously published as “Trading into the Future” Location: Geneva, Switzerland Written and published by the Established: 1 January 1995 World Trade Organization Information and Media Relations Division Created by: Uruguay Round negotiations (1986–94) © WTO 1995, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007 Membership: 150 countries (since 11 January 2007) Budget: 175 million Swiss francs for 2006 An up-to-date version of this text also appears on the WTO website (http://www.wto.org, click on “the WTO”), where it is Secretariat staff: 635 regularly updated to reflect developments in the WTO. Head: Pascal Lamy (director-general) Contact the WTO Information Division rue de Lausanne 154, CH–1211 Genève 21, Switzerland Functions: Tel: (41–22) 739 5007/5190 • Fax: (41–22) 739 54 58 • Administering WTO trade agreements e-mail: [email protected] • Forum for trade negotiations Contact WTO Publications • Handling trade disputes rue de Lausanne 154, CH–1211 Genève 21, Switzerland • Monitoring national trade policies Tel: (41–22) 739 5208/5308 • Fax: (41–22) 739 5792 e-mail: [email protected] • Technical assistance and training for developing countries • Cooperation with other international organizations February 2007 — 6 000 copies Understanding the WTO 3rd edition Previously published as “Trading into the Future” September 2003, revised February 2007 ABBREVIATIONS Some of the abbreviations and acronyms used in the WTO: ITC International Trade Centre ITO International Trade Organization ACP African, Caribbean and Pacific Group MEA Multilateral
  • Diagnosis: Selection at the World Trade Organization

    Diagnosis: Selection at the World Trade Organization

    3 Diagnosis: Selection at the World Trade Organization Conflict over leadership selection at the IMF and the World Bank did not result from flaws in the formal governance of those organizations. A combination of weighted voting and informal agreement that narrow majorities and formal votes were to be avoided enabled these organizations in the end to surmount conflict and produce new leadership. Restric- tions on selection that had been imposed by the dominant members, a product of their decision-making weight within the organization, were the principal source of conflict. Whether or not that dual monopoly—the convention—will persist is the central question for future leadership selection in these organizations. Conflict over leadership selection at the WTO in the 1990s had very different sources. Although the field of candidates in each selection might have been larger or, some would argue, more distinguished or expert, certainly there were few restrictions on the pool of candidates. Unlike the IFIs, lack of competition was not a problem at the WTO. Rather, active and open competition for the top position in the organization could not be resolved. Instead of consensus on a new director-general, the WTO found prolonged deadlock and increasingly bitter division. Conflict fi- nally produced a director-general with a shortened term in one instance (Renato Ruggiero, 1995) and in a second case, two directors-general with even shorter terms as part of a term-sharing agreement (Mike Moore and Supachai Panitchpakdi). Leadership selection is only one aspect of a broader crisis of decision making at the WTO. Solving recurrent conflict and stalemate over selection of the director-general will finally require a deeper reform of decision making at the organization.
  • Wiggle Rooms: New Issues and North-South Negotiations During the Uruguay Round

    Wiggle Rooms: New Issues and North-South Negotiations During the Uruguay Round

    Wiggle Rooms: New Issues and North-South Negotiations during the Uruguay Round J. P. Singh Communication, Culture and Technology Program Georgetown University 3520 Prospect Street, NW, Suite 311 Washington, DC 20057 Ph: 202/687-2525 Fax: 202/687-1720 E-mail: [email protected] Research support for this paper was provided through the Social Science Research Council’s Summer Fellowship Program on ‘Information Technology, International Cooperation, and Global Security’ held at Columbia University and a competitive research grant from Georgetown University. My thanks to the SSRC fellows in the summer program for their input. I am also grateful to John Odell and Susan Sell for help with this project. Previous versions of this paper were presented to the Washington Interest in Negotiations (WIN) group and the 2003 American Political Science Association, which provided important feedback. My thanks to the discussants Beth Yarborough, and William Zartman. Prepared for the conference on Developing Countries and the Trade Negotiation Process, 6 and 7 November 2003, UNCTAD, Palais des Nations, Room XXVII, Geneva COMMENTS WELCOME. Please ask author’s permission before citing. 1 Are developing countries marginalized in the formation of global rules governing new issues such as services and intellectual property rights?1 Not if they are savvy negotiators and the developed countries are not unified in their stance, suggests this study. Analysts examine the gains developing countries make in such ‘high-tech’ issue areas (Grieco 1982; Odell 1993; Singh 2002A) to note that the weak do not necessarily suffer the will of the strong. Their success with high-tech negotiations, in fact, bodes well for them in issue areas in which they are strong (for example, agriculture or textiles).
  • FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the Year Ended 31 July 2015 CONTENTS

    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the Year Ended 31 July 2015 CONTENTS

    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 July 2015 CONTENTS 2 Report of the Chairman of the Court of Governors 3 Report of the Director of the School 4-16 Report of the Directors 17-19 Accounting Policies 20 Consolidated Income and Expenditure Account 21 Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses 22 Balance Sheets 23 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 24-39 Notes to the Accounts 40 Five Year Group Financial Summary 41-44 Corporate Governance and Internal Control Statement 45 Environmental Policy 46 Endowment Investment Performance 47 Report of the Auditors 49 Directors of the School and Members of the Council REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COURT OF GOVERNORS I am delighted to have been appointed Chairman of the LSE. It would be a privilege 2 at any time to be associated with such a prestigious educational establishment, but these are especially exciting times, as the School celebrates the 120th anniversary of its foundation. I am committed to ensuring that during my tenure the School remains focused and ambitious in its commitment to its core mission, delivering world- class teaching, research and public engagement. I am exceedingly grateful to my predecessor, Peter Sutherland, for his dedicated service to the School as Chairman, and trust that he remains a friend to us following his retirement, and despite his extensive and prestigious portfolio of continuing responsibilities. Since taking up my role in February, I have instituted a full-scale review As ever, the School has put on an enviable programme of public lectures of governance, to ensure that everyone within and outside the School and events, and among other illustrious speakers we welcomed this year community understands and respects the workings of the institution.
  • Uruguay Round Matthias Oesch

    Uruguay Round Matthias Oesch

    Uruguay Round Matthias Oesch Content type: Encyclopedia entries Product: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL] Article last updated: April 2014 Subject(s): Tariffs — Developing countries — National treatment — Most-favoured-nation treatment (MFN) — Goods — Subsidies — Technical barriers to trade — Specific trade agreements Published under the auspices of the Max Planck Foundation for International Peace and the Rule of Law under the direction of Rüdiger Wolfrum. From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Subscriber: UZH Hauptbibliothek / Zentralbibliothek Zurich; date: 09 August 2019 A. Negotiations 1 The Uruguay Round was the eighth post-war multilateral trade negotiation conducted under the → General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1947 and 1994) (‘GATT 1947’ and ‘GATT 1994’; see also → International Economic Law). It started with a Ministerial Meeting held in Punta del Este in Uruguay on 20 September 1986. The → Final Act and the texts annexed were eventually signed in Marrakesh, Morocco, on 15 April 1994, and entered into force on 1 January 1995. This round led to the creation of the → World Trade Organization (WTO). For the first time, multilateral trade negotiations covered virtually every sector of world trade. Moreover and equally unprecedented, participation by both industrialized and → developing countries was truly global. Overall, the Uruguay Round was the largest trade negotiation ever, and it resulted in a historic quantum leap in institutionalized global economic cooperation. 1. Launch 2 One of the essential functions of the GATT 1947 framework was to host a series of major multilateral trade negotiation rounds. The first six of these rounds were concerned mainly with the reduction of tariffs (Geneva Conference 1947; Annecy Conference 1949; Torquay Conference 1950–51; Geneva Conference 1956; Geneva Conference [also known as Dillon Round] 1960–61; Kennedy Round 1964–67).
  • What Future for Federalism? About the CER

    What Future for Federalism? About the CER

    Gilles Andréani ★ What future for federalism? about the CER The Centre for European Reform is a think-tank devoted to improving the quality of the debate on the European Union. It is a forum for people with ideas from Britain and across the contintent to discuss the many social, political and economic challenges facing Europe. It seeks to work with similar bodies in other European countries, North America and elsewhere in the world. The CER is pro-European but not uncritical. It regards European integration What future as largely beneficial but recognises that in many respects the Union does not work well. The CER therefore aims to promote new ideas and policies for reforming the European Union. ★ for Director: CHARLES GRANT ADVISORY BOARD PERCY BARNEVIK................................................................................ Chairman, AstraZeneca CARL BILDT................................................................................ Former Swedish Prime Minister federalism? ANTONIO BORGES............................................................................... Former Dean of INSEAD NICK BUTLER (CHAIR)............................... Group Vice President for Policy Development, BP p.l.c. LORD DAHRENDORF ............ Former Warden of St Antony’s College, Oxford & EU Commissioner VERNON ELLIS..................................................................... International Chairman, Accenture JOHN GRAY........................................................................ Professor of European Thought, LSE LORD HANNAY.........................................................
  • LAW WP Template 2013 2012

    LAW WP Template 2013 2012

    LAW 2013/10 Department of Law The Establishment of a GATT Office of Legal Affairs and the Limits of ‘Public Reason’ in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann European University Institute Department of Law The Establishment of a GATT Office of Legal Affairs and the Limits of ‘Public Reason’ in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann EUI Working Paper LAW 2013/10 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1725-6739 © Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, 2013 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Abstract: The article offers an ‘insider story’ of the establishment of the Office of Legal Affairs in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947) in 1982/83 and of its increasing involvement in assisting GATT dispute settlement panels and the Uruguay Round negotiations on a new World Trade Organization with compulsory jurisdiction for the settlement of trade disputes (Sections I and II). The transformation, within only one decade, of the anti-legal pragmatism in GATT 1947 into the compulsory WTO dispute settlement system amounted to a ‘revolution’ in international law. But the ‘public
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Bargaining Power in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Canada and Japan in Th

    The London School of Economics and Political Science Bargaining Power in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Canada and Japan in Th

    The London School of Economics and Political Science Bargaining power in multilateral trade negotiations: Canada and Japan in the Uruguay Round and Doha Development Agenda. Jens Philipp Anton Lamprecht A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, January 2014 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 95676 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Trevor G. Cooper. Signed: Jens Philipp Anton Lamprecht. 2 In memory of my grandparents, Antonette Dinnesen and Heinrich Dinnesen. To my family: My parents, my brother, my aunt, and Hans-Werner am Zehnhoff. 3 Acknowledgements Very special thanks go to my supervisors, Dr. Razeen Sally and Dr. Stephen Woolcock. I thank Razeen for his constant patience, especially at the beginning of this project, and for his great intellectual advice and feedback.
  • Scripting Memory: Hollywood, the Federal Government, And

    Scripting Memory: Hollywood, the Federal Government, And

    SCRIPTING MEMORY: HOLLYWOOD, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND PUBLIC MEMORY IN WWII by Jason Jonathan Rivas, B.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in History December 2020 Committee Members: Nancy K. Berlage, Chair Ellen D. Tillman Angela F. Murphy COPYRIGHT by Jason Jonathan Rivas 2020 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Jason Jonathan Rivas, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. DEDICATION To my mother, Blanca, for never giving up on me. Your eagle finally found his wings. To my fiancée, Courtney Stevens, for being the Linda to my Paul McCartney. Ram on. To every high school dropout with a dream. We are more than just a statistic. I’m rooting for you. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first want to thank my mother, Blanca, and my fiancée, Courtney Stevens, for their love and support. Mom, I would not be me if it were not for you showing me that it is okay to be so. Courtney, there are no words to describe the incredible support you provide me and my work throughout the years.