1 Seasonal melting and the formation of
2 sedimentary rocks on Mars, with predictions for the
3 Gale Crater mound
a b c 4 Edwin S. Kite , Itay Halevy , Melinda A. Kahre ,
d e,f 5 Michael J. Wolff , and Michael Manga
a 6 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology,
7 Pasadena, California 91125, USA
b 8 Department of Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, P.O. Box 26,
9 Rehovot 76100, Israel
c 10 NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, California 94035, USA
d 11 Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, Colorado, USA
e 12 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley,
13 California 94720, USA
f 14 Center for Integrative Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley,
15 California 94720, USA
16 Number of pages: 84
17 Number of tables: 1
18 Number of figures: 19
Preprint submitted to Icarus 16 November 2012 19 Proposed Running Head:
20 Seasonal melting and sedimentary rocks on Mars
21 Please send Editorial Correspondence to:
22
23 Edwin S. Kite
24 Caltech, MC 150-21
25 Geological and Planetary Sciences
26 1200 E. California Boulevard
27 Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
28
29 Email: [email protected]
2 30 ABSTRACT
31 A model for the formation and distribution of sedimentary rocks on Mars is pro-
32 posed. The rate–limiting step is supply of liquid water from seasonal melting of
2 33 snow or ice. The model (ISEE-Mars) is run for a O(10 ) mbar pure CO2 atmo-
34 sphere, dusty snow, and solar luminosity reduced by 23%. For these conditions
35 snow only melts near the equator, and only when obliquity and eccentricity are
36 high, and perihelion occurs near equinox. These requirements for melting are sat-
37 isfied by 0.01–20% of the probability distribution of Mars’ past spin-orbit parame-
38 ters. Total melt production is sufficient to account for observed aqueous alteration
39 of the sedimentary rocks. The pattern of seasonal snowmelt is integrated over all
40 spin-orbit parameters and compared to the observed distribution of sedimentary
41 rocks. The global distribution of snowmelt has maxima in Valles Marineris, Merid-
42 iani Planum and Gale Crater. These correspond to maxima in the sedimentary-rock
43 distribution. Higher pressures and especially higher temperatures lead to melting
44 over a broader range of spin-orbit parameters. The pattern of sedimentary rocks on
45 Mars is most consistent with a model Mars paleoclimate that only rarely produced
46 enough meltwater to precipitate aqueous cements (sulfates, carbonates, phyllosil-
47 icates and silica) and indurate sediment. This is consistent with observations sug-
48 gesting that surface aqueous alteration on Mars was brief and at low water/rock
49 ratio. The results suggest intermittency of snowmelt and long globally-dry inter-
50 vals, unfavorable for past life on Mars. This model makes testable predictions for
51 the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover at Gale Crater’s mound (Mount Sharp,
52 Aeolis Mons). Gale Crater’s mound is predicted to be a hemispheric maximum for
53 snowmelt on Mars.
54 Keywords: MARS, CLIMATE; MARS, SURFACE; MARS, ATMOSPHERE; GE-
55 OLOGICAL PROCESSES; MARS
3 56 1 Introduction
57 The early Mars climate problem has bedevilled generations of scientists (Sagan and
58 Mullen, 1972; Kasting, 1991; Haberle, 1998; Wordsworth et al., 2012a): What al-
59 lowed widespread sedimentary rocks and valley networks on a planet in a distant
60 orbit around a faint young star? What caused that environment to deteriorate? Cli- ¯ 61 mate models struggle to maintain annual mean temperatures T & 273K on early
62 Mars (Haberle, 1998; Wordsworth et al., 2012a). Seasonal melting can occur for
63 annual maximum temperatures Tmax & 273K, which is much easier to achieve.
64 Therefore, seasonal melting of snow and ice is a candidate water source for surface
65 runoff and aqueous mineralization on Mars. Surface temperatures reach ∼300K
66 at low latitudes on today’s Mars. However, seasonal melting of surface-covering,
67 flat-lying snowpack does not occur because of (1) evaporative cooling and (2) cold-
68 trapping of snow and ice near the poles or at depth. Reduced solar luminosity for
69 early Mars makes melting more difficult (Squyres and Kasting, 1994).
70 Milankovitch cycles exert a strong control on Mars ice temperatures (Toon et al.,
71 1980). Melting is favored when snow is darkened by dust, when evaporative cool-
72 ing is reduced by increased pressure, and when the solid-state greenhouse effect
73 is strong (Toon et al., 1980; Clow, 1987). Equatorial snowpacks should form at
74 high obliquity (Jakosky and Carr, 1985), so melt could contribute to the observed
75 low-latitude erosion. Orbital change shifts the locations of cold-traps in which sub-
76 surface ice is most stable (Schorghofer and Forget, 2012). Melting on steep slopes
77 is a candidate water source for young midlatitude gullies (e.g., Costard et al. 2002;
78 Hecht 2002). For example, Williams et al. (2009) modeled melting of relatively
2 79 clean snow overlain by a thin, dark lag deposit. They found melt rates ∼ 1 kg/m /hr
80 on steep slopes, and argue that this is sufficient to form gullies through either fluvial
4 81 or debris–flow incision. The Laboratoire de Met´ eorologie´ Dynamique (LMD) Gen-
82 eral Circulation Model (GCM) has been used to simulate the early Martian hy-
83 drological cycle, including melting, for selected orbital parameters (Fastook et al.,
84 2012; Wordsworth et al., 2012a).
85 This paper has two purposes. The first is to extend the global snowmelt models with
86 a new model, ISEE-Mars (Ice and Snow Environment Evaluator for Mars). For the
87 first time, ISEE-Mars integrates a model of snowpack temperatures over all spin-
88 orbit parameters, while keeping track of cold-traps. Chaotic diffusion in the solar
89 system makes it almost certain that Mars’ obliquity (φ) has ranged twenty times
90 more widely than Earth’s obliquity over billion-year periods, and that Mars’ eccen-
91 tricity has had a long-term variance twice that of the Earth (Touma and Wisdom,
92 1993; Laskar and Robutel, 1993; Laskar et al., 2004; Laskar, 2008). These wide
93 swings cause large variations in insolation and propensity to melt (Figure 1).
geological observa ons
chao c diffusion current of spin-orbit spin-orbit parameters parameters tendency to produce melt