Orbital Evidence for More Widespread Carbonate- 10.1002/2015JE004972 Bearing Rocks on Mars Key Point: James J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Curiosity's Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars
Curiosity’s Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars K. S. Edgett – 27 September 2010 Simulated view from Curiosity rover in landing ellipse looking toward the field area in Gale; made using MRO CTX stereopair images; no vertical exaggeration. The mound is ~15 km away 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 in this view. Note that one would see Gale’s SW wall in the distant background if this were Edgett, 1 actually taken by the Mastcams on Mars. Gale Presents Perhaps the Thickest and Most Diverse Exposed Stratigraphic Section on Mars • Gale’s Mound appears to present the thickest and most diverse exposed stratigraphic section on Mars that we can hope access in this decade. • Mound has ~5 km of stratified rock. (That’s 3 miles!) • There is no evidence that volcanism ever occurred in Gale. • Mound materials were deposited as sediment. • Diverse materials are present. • Diverse events are recorded. – Episodes of sedimentation and lithification and diagenesis. – Episodes of erosion, transport, and re-deposition of mound materials. 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 2 Gale is at ~5°S on the “north-south dichotomy boundary” in the Aeolis and Nepenthes Mensae Region base map made by MSSS for National Geographic (February 2001); from MOC wide angle images and MOLA topography 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 3 Proposed MSL Field Site In Gale Crater Landing ellipse - very low elevation (–4.5 km) - shown here as 25 x 20 km - alluvium from crater walls - drive to mound Anderson & Bell -
What Is Hesperia Planum, Mars? an Examination of Multiple Working Hypotheses
Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVI (2005) 1962.pdf What is Hesperia Planum, Mars? An Examination of Multiple Working Hypotheses. Tracy K.P. Gregg1 and D.A. Crown2, 1Dept. of Geology, 876 Natural Sciences Complex, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, [email protected], 2David A. Crown, Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, [email protected]. Introduction: Hesperia Planum, Mars, ~1000 km to the southwest. Subsequent mapping characterized by a high concentration of mare-type and crater size-frequency distributions suggested an wrinkle ridges and ridge rings [1-4], encompasses a Amazonian age for this flow field [14]. Subsequent region of over 2 million square kilometers in the work [13-16] suggested that easily eroded volcanic southern highlands (Fig. 1). The most common deposits (interpreted to be pyroclastic deposits, interpretation is that the plains materials were probably flows) from Tyrrhena Patera extend several emplaced as“flood” lavas that filled in low-lying hundred kilometers to the northwest. Thus, only regions [5-10]. Deposit thickness, based on about one-third of what had originally been partially buried craters, is <3 km [4]. Its stratigraphic identified as Hesperia Planum ridged plains remains position and crater-retention age [e.g., 9, 11, 12; as such. In addition, Mest and Crown [17] map a Tanaka, 1986] define the base of the Hesperian dissected plains unit to the south of Tyrrhena Patera System. In addition, the mare-type wrinkle ridges on that may be a portion of Hesperia Planum modified its surface make Hesperia Planum the type locale for by fluvial activity, and Crown and Mest [18] note “Hesperian-aged ridged plains” on Mars [e.g., 9]. -
The Evolution of a Heterogeneous Martian Mantle: Clues from K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni Variations in Gusev Basalts and Shergottite Meteorites
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 296 (2010) 67–77 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The evolution of a heterogeneous Martian mantle: Clues from K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni variations in Gusev basalts and shergottite meteorites Mariek E. Schmidt a,⁎, Timothy J. McCoy b a Dept. of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada L2S 3A1 b Dept. of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0119, USA article info abstract Article history: Martian basalts represent samples of the interior of the planet, and their composition reflects their source at Received 10 December 2009 the time of extraction as well as later igneous processes that affected them. To better understand the Received in revised form 16 April 2010 composition and evolution of Mars, we compare whole rock compositions of basaltic shergottitic meteorites Accepted 21 April 2010 and basaltic lavas examined by the Spirit Mars Exploration Rover in Gusev Crater. Concentrations range from Available online 2 June 2010 K-poor (as low as 0.02 wt.% K2O) in the shergottites to K-rich (up to 1.2 wt.% K2O) in basalts from the Editor: R.W. Carlson Columbia Hills (CH) of Gusev Crater; the Adirondack basalts from the Gusev Plains have more intermediate concentrations of K2O (0.16 wt.% to below detection limit). The compositional dataset for the Gusev basalts is Keywords: more limited than for the shergottites, but it includes the minor elements K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni, whose behavior Mars igneous processes during mantle melting varies from very incompatible (prefers melt) to very compatible (remains in the shergottites residuum). -
MARS an Overview of the 1985–2006 Mars Orbiter Camera Science
MARS MARS INFORMATICS The International Journal of Mars Science and Exploration Open Access Journals Science An overview of the 1985–2006 Mars Orbiter Camera science investigation Michael C. Malin1, Kenneth S. Edgett1, Bruce A. Cantor1, Michael A. Caplinger1, G. Edward Danielson2, Elsa H. Jensen1, Michael A. Ravine1, Jennifer L. Sandoval1, and Kimberley D. Supulver1 1Malin Space Science Systems, P.O. Box 910148, San Diego, CA, 92191-0148, USA; 2Deceased, 10 December 2005 Citation: Mars 5, 1-60, 2010; doi:10.1555/mars.2010.0001 History: Submitted: August 5, 2009; Reviewed: October 18, 2009; Accepted: November 15, 2009; Published: January 6, 2010 Editor: Jeffrey B. Plescia, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University Reviewers: Jeffrey B. Plescia, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University; R. Aileen Yingst, University of Wisconsin Green Bay Open Access: Copyright 2010 Malin Space Science Systems. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: NASA selected the Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) investigation in 1986 for the Mars Observer mission. The MOC consisted of three elements which shared a common package: a narrow angle camera designed to obtain images with a spatial resolution as high as 1.4 m per pixel from orbit, and two wide angle cameras (one with a red filter, the other blue) for daily global imaging to observe meteorological events, geodesy, and provide context for the narrow angle images. Following the loss of Mars Observer in August 1993, a second MOC was built from flight spare hardware and launched aboard Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) in November 1996. -
Chemical Variations in Yellowknife Bay Formation Sedimentary Rocks
PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Chemical variations in Yellowknife Bay formation 10.1002/2014JE004681 sedimentary rocks analyzed by ChemCam Special Section: on board the Curiosity rover on Mars Results from the first 360 Sols of the Mars Science Laboratory N. Mangold1, O. Forni2, G. Dromart3, K. Stack4, R. C. Wiens5, O. Gasnault2, D. Y. Sumner6, M. Nachon1, Mission: Bradbury Landing P.-Y. Meslin2, R. B. Anderson7, B. Barraclough4, J. F. Bell III8, G. Berger2, D. L. Blaney9, J. C. Bridges10, through Yellowknife Bay F. Calef9, B. Clark11, S. M. Clegg5, A. Cousin5, L. Edgar8, K. Edgett12, B. Ehlmann4, C. Fabre13, M. Fisk14, J. Grotzinger4, S. Gupta15, K. E. Herkenhoff7, J. Hurowitz16, J. R. Johnson17, L. C. Kah18, N. Lanza19, Key Points: 2 1 20 21 12 16 2 • J. Lasue , S. Le Mouélic , R. Léveillé , E. Lewin , M. Malin , S. McLennan , S. Maurice , Fluvial sandstones analyzed by 22 22 23 19 19 24 25 ChemCam display subtle chemical N. Melikechi , A. Mezzacappa , R. Milliken , H. Newsom , A. Ollila , S. K. Rowland , V. Sautter , variations M. Schmidt26, S. Schröder2,C.d’Uston2, D. Vaniman27, and R. Williams27 • Combined analysis of chemistry and texture highlights the role of 1Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, CNRS, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 2Institut de Recherche diagenesis en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS/Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, Toulouse, France, 3Laboratoire de Géologie de • Distinct chemistry in upper layers 4 5 suggests distinct setting and/or Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, Los Alamos National 6 source Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA, 7Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. -
Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies. -
IN-SITU RADIOMETRIC AGE DETERMINATION: a CRITICAL COMPONENT of MARS EXPLORATION. J. B. Plescia1 and T. D. Swindle2, 1Applied
Seventh International Conference on Mars 3278.pdf IN-SITU RADIOMETRIC AGE DETERMINATION: A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF MARS EXPLORATION. J. B. Plescia1 and T. D. Swindle2, 1Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, [email protected]. 2Department of Planetary Sciences, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, [email protected]. Introduction: In order to understand the geologic, Bombardment [12-18], although this remains a contro- climatic and possibly the biologic evolution of Mars, versial topic. It has also been suggested that the crater- the absolute timing of events must be established. ing rate over the last several billion years has not been Questions of climate change, glacial processes, avail- uniform, but rather has been punctuated by periodic ability of surface water, recent volcanism, and atmos- spikes in the rate [19-20]. pheric evolution all hinge on determining when those events occurred in absolute time. Resolving the abso- lute timing of events has become even more critical with the suggestions of currently active glacial and perhaps fluvial activity and very young volcanic activ- ity. Background: To date, only the relative chronology of events has been firmly established [1]. This has been accomplished through the use of impact crater counts in which the frequency of impact craters per unit area greater than or equal to some diameter is used as a reference for comparison among surfaces; the higher the frequency, the older the age [2-3]. This technique allows surfaces and events on different parts of a planet to be correlated in time. -
Martian Crater Morphology
ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter. -
Groundwater Seepage Landscapes from Distant and Local Sources in Experiments and on Mars
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 389–408, 2015 www.earth-surf-dynam.net/3/389/2015/ doi:10.5194/esurf-3-389-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Groundwater seepage landscapes from distant and local sources in experiments and on Mars W. A. Marra1, S. J. McLelland2, D. R. Parsons2, B. J. Murphy2, E. Hauber3, and M. G. Kleinhans1 1Faculty of Geosciences, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands 2Department of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK 3Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Planetenforschung, Rutherfordstraße 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany Correspondence to: W. A. Marra ([email protected]) Received: 4 February 2015 – Published in Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss.: 19 February 2015 Revised: 18 June 2015 – Accepted: 3 July 2015 – Published: 4 August 2015 Abstract. Valleys with theater-shaped heads can form due to the seepage of groundwater and as a result of knickpoint (waterfall) erosion generated by overland flow. This ambiguity in the mechanism of formation ham- pers the interpretation of such valleys on Mars, particularly since there is limited knowledge of material prop- erties. Moreover, the hydrological implications of a groundwater or surface water origin are important for our understanding of the evolution of surface features on Mars, and a quantification of valley morphologies at the landscape scale may provide diagnostic insights on the formative hydrological conditions. However, flow pat- terns and the resulting landscapes produced by different sources of groundwater are poorly understood. We aim to improve the understanding of the formation of entire valley landscapes through seepage processes from dif- ferent groundwater sources that will provide a framework of landscape metrics for the interpretation of such systems. -
Geological Map of Terra Cimmeria, Mars
51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 2766.pdf GEOLOGIC MAP OF TERRA CIMMERIA, MARS. A. G. Siwabessy1,2, C. M. Rodrigue1, and R. C. Ander- son2, 1Department of Geography, California State University-Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90840 ([email protected]), 2Geophysics and Planetary Geosciences Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91109 Introduction: The Tharsis Rise dominates the ping area, trending into Hesperia Planum. Further to tectonic geomorphology of the western hemisphere of the northwest, a third type of basin – by far the least Mars. Anderson et al. [1] challenged the premise of mature of the three observed types – is observed. They [2], a prior study that presupposed that Tharsis uplift- are sometimes clearly associated with antecedent im- ed in a single event centered near Pavonis Mons. [1] pact structures. As they are occasionally connected by found instead that compressional and extensional fea- cascading sequences of downslope-incising valleys, tures across the western hemisphere are controlled by fluvial erosion may have occurred coevally with the five primary tectonic centers, of which the most an- regional uplift at [6]'s Hadriarca-Tyrrhena center. cient lies near the Claritas Rise. More recently, [3,4] Other than globally-distributed wrinkle ridge sets [8], studied putative basin and range topography on the explicit tectonic signatures associating Terra Cimme- southwest margin of the Tharsis Rise. [4] correlated ria to regional forcers (such as Tharsis) are not ob- the orientation of these features to predicted extension served. However, this does not necessarily limit forc- modeled by [5], but only if their model is rotated by ing effects of far-field activity – particularly from 12o and then re-centered not on the predicted regime Tharsis – from controlling the basin’s subsurface ge- by [2] but on the Stage 1 Claritas center of [1]. -
Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions. -
Chronology of Hesperia Planum, Mars: New Constraints Using Impact Craters As Stratigraphic Markers
45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2014) 2793.pdf CHRONOLOGY OF HESPERIA PLANUM, MARS: NEW CONSTRAINTS USING IMPACT CRATERS AS STRATIGRAPHIC MARKERS. S. C. Mest1,2 and D. A. Crown1, 1Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ ([email protected]); 2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. Introduction: Impact craters represent temporally Images are imported into ArcGIS for each crater and stratigraphically distinct events in the geologic analyzed. The margins of the continuous ejecta blanket, record of a planetary surface. They can be used to crater rim, and crater floor deposits are mapped, and the constrain the local and regional geologic history by diameters of superposed craters are measured. ArcGIS combining relative and absolute age estimates for crater is being used to calculate unit areas and record crater materials with observations of cross-cutting diameters. Crater size-frequency distribution statistics relationships between impact craters and other geologic are compiled using the methodology described in [15- features. Model ages derived for impact crater materials 18]; all craters (D>50 m) on a given surface are counted in Hesperia Planum (HP) are providing important while avoiding obvious secondary craters and secondary temporal constraints on emplacement of the ridged rays, chains, or clusters. These data are plotted on plains material, ridge-forming events, and fluvial isochrons [16-18] to assess relative age (Martian time- modification of the plains. This abstract presents results stratigraphic age) and estimate absolute age. The obtained from analyses of several large impact craters in production function used to determine the isochrons the Hesperia Planum region. includes both primaries and a component of Geologic Setting: Hesperia Planum (> 2 million “background” secondaries (i.e., secondaries not km2 in area) is characterized by a high concentration of included in rays, chains or clusters) [16-18].