On the Criticism of Hegelian Necessity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Criticism of Hegelian Necessity University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 On the Criticism of Hegelian Necessity Rosa Turrisi Fuller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Fuller, R. T.(2019). On the Criticism of Hegelian Necessity. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5481 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. On the Criticism of Hegelian Necessity by Rosa Turrisi Fuller Bachelor of Science University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 2002 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Leah McClimans, Major Professor Martin Donougho, Committee Member Heike Sefrin-Weis, Committee Member Meili Steele, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Rosa Turrisi Fuller, 2019 All Rights Reserved. ii Dedication To Evram. iii Acknowledgements I am grateful to Martin Donougho for sharing his insights into Hegel research and for his constructive criticism of my work. I would also like to thank Leah McClimans, Heike Sefrin-Weis, and Meili Steele for providing a philosophically informed perspective on my work outside of the specialty of Hegel research. In addition, I am grateful to my family for their continual support and confidence in me without which I could not have completed this project. iv Abstract According to Hegel, there are no intrinsic limitations on the extent of human knowledge and reason, and one of the prerequisites of overcoming their relative limits is a logic that is capable of grasping the intrinsic contradictions in things. Hegel claims that his Logic shows that these contradictions are immanently necessary. By means of a close reexamination of Hegel’s own texts, I defend this claim against two of his most prominent nineteenth century critics, Schelling and Trendelenburg, who hope to undermine Hegelian rationalism and defend the more modest Kantian outlook. I also show that a school of interpretation that I call intuitionism fails in its attempt to defend Hegelian necessity. In Part 1, I address Schelling’s claim that Hegel’s Logic cannot be necessary because it relies on presuppositions. I also show that the intuitionist interpretation of Hegelian necessity is both self-defeating and textually inaccurate. Contrary to Schelling and the intuitionists, I argue that Hegelian necessity must be grasped as logical necessity in accordance with the principle of non-contradiction, but that the application of this principle produces other principles, the principle of contradiction and the principle of the unity of opposites, which express its intrinsically limited scope. In Part 2, I address Trendelenburg’s claim that Hegel’s Logic cannot be necessary because, as himself Hegel insists, it relies on a posteriori knowledge. The intuitionist Houlgate, like many other Hegel interpreters, attempts to defend the Logic against the v intellectual descendants of Trendelenburg’s criticism by reducing Hegel’s absolute idealism to Kantian subjective idealism. I refute this interpretation and show that, according to Hegel, Kant’s subjective idealism is grounded in a prejudice against contradiction, a prejudice that Trendelenburg shares and on which his criticism of Hegelian necessity is based. vi Table of Contents Dedication ......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iv Abstract .............................................................................................................................. v Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Part 1 ................................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 1: Schelling’s Criticisms of Hegelian Logical Necessity .................................... 11 Chapter 2: The Intuitionist Defense of Hegelian Necessity ............................................. 29 Chapter 3: An Interpretation of the Immanent Logical Necessity of Hegel’s Logic ...................................................................................................................... 84 Chapter 4: The Demystification of Hegel’s Logic: An Answer to Hegel’s Critics and Defenders...................................................................................................... 131 Part 2 .............................................................................................................................. 168 Chapter 5: Trendelenburg’s Criticisms of Hegelian Logical Necessity ........................ 168 Chapter 6: Houlgate’s A Priori Interpretation of Hegel’s Logic .................................... 179 Chapter 7: A Defense of Hegelian Dialectical Logical Necessity against Kantian Subjective Idealism .............................................................................. 198 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 242 vii Introduction G. W. F. Hegel had the rare personal good fortune of being alive when his philosophy reached the height of its popularity. His lectures at the Berlin University enjoyed enormous popularity up until his death in 1831. However, by the second half of the nineteenth century, the period following the Prussian Reform movement, Hegel’s philosophy had been from toppled its place of prominence and something approaching a consensus had developed in the academy that his philosophy was misguided and unreasonable and, in a word, false. Some scholars have interpreted the decline in its popularity as evidence that the discipline of philosophy had finally come to its senses. In their accounts, one reads an almost audible sigh of relief that the inexplicable state of hypnosis engendered by the foolish Hegelian philosophy was ultimately so short-lived. For instance, Frederick Beiser calls the second half of the nineteenth century “the age that cured itself of Fichtean and Hegelian jargon” and “realized all too well the great bane of needless technicality and the great value of clarity and common sense.”1 However, a shift this profound requires a serious explanation. It cannot be chalked up either to the fickleness of philosophers or transparently obvious errors at the heart of Hegel’s system. Moreover, such explanations are out of all proportion with the character of Hegel’s philosophy itself, which was too 1 Beiser, After Hegel, 7. 1 systematic and thorough to have been a mere fad or to have been refuted so easily. Moreover, such explanations also downplay the significance of a political shift in nineteenth century Germany that led to the exclusion of Hegelians from academia. By the early 1840s, Hegel’s ambitious rationalist project had become a pole of attraction for the criticism of the religious authority on which the state relied for its legitimacy. Moreover, Hegel’s great intellectual prestige and influence made it difficult for the government to rely on a purely brute force approach to the disciples of the great master, so, in 1841, Schelling, Hegel’s former friend, was brought to Berlin and was appointed to Hegel’s old chair at the Berlin University for the purpose of attacking Hegel’s system, and above all his Logic.2 This unleashed one of the most important debates in German intellectual history. The debate over Hegel’s philosophy that took place in Berlin in the 1840s, shook German intellectual life. It was one of those rare moments in the history of philosophy when the passions and intellect of leading academics in other fields as well as religious and political figures and ordinary citizens were roused and engaged by a philosophy. Schelling had not published a single work since 1804. However, the prestige of his philosophy of nature was still enormous, and news of his animosity toward Hegel’s philosophy had spread to Berlin. As early as the Erlangen lectures in 1820, Schelling had 2 In this study, I adopt the convention of shortening the title of Hegel’s Science of Logic to Logic. 2 criticized Hegel’s philosophy. In his lectures in Munich in the 1830s, Schelling further developed these criticisms. Even before Schelling came to Berlin, another Berlin University professor, Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg, set himself the task of refuting Hegel’s Logic. Trendelenburg’s work, Logische Untersuchungen, which has never been translated into English in full, has been assigned an important historical role in turning the tide against Hegelianism. Beiser credits Trendelenburg rather than Schelling with providing “a devastating critique” of Hegel’s dialectic.3 Both Schelling and Trendelenburg disputed the grounds on which Hegel based his rationalist optimism. Hegel insisted that there was nothing that is in principle unknowable by the human mind, and he claimed that his own philosophy provided the key to illuminating questions that had vexed philosophers for centuries. This key was his dialectical logic, which, he
Recommended publications
  • Hegel and Marx on Alienation a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University By
    HEGEL AND MARX ON ALIENATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SEVGİ DOĞAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FEBRUARY 2008 Approval of the Graduate School of (Name of the Graduate School) Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts of Philosophy. Assist. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan (METU, PHIL) Assist. Prof. Dr. Elif Çırakman (METU, PHIL) Assist. Prof. Dr. Çetin Türkyılmaz (Hacettepe U., PHIL) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Sevgi Doğan Signature : iii ABSTRACT HEGEL AND MARX ON ALIENATION Doğan, Sevgi M.A., Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Barış Parkan February 2008, 139 pages Is alienation a process of self-discovery or is it a loss of reality? The subject of this thesis is how alienation is discussed in Hegel and Marx’s philosophies in terms of this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Naturalism and the Market God David Timothy Denenny Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Theses Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2018 Cultural Naturalism and the Market God David Timothy Denenny Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Denenny, David Timothy, "Cultural Naturalism and the Market God" (2018). Theses. 2464. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2464 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CULTURAL NATURALISM AND THE MARKET GOD by David Denenny B.A. Eastern Washington University, 2015 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree Department of Philosophy in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale December 2018 Copyright by David Denenny, 2018 All Rights Reserved THESIS APPROVAL CULTURAL NATURALISM AND THE MARKET GOD by David Denenny A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the field of Philosophy Approved by: Kenneth William Stikkers, Chair Randall Auxier Alfred Frankowski Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale November 8, 2018 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF David Denenny, for the Master of Arts degree in Philosophy, presented on November 8, 2018, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: CULTURAL NATURALISM AND THE MARKET GOD MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Kenneth William Stikkers This work employs John Dewey's cultural naturalism to explore how and why the orthodox economic tradition functions as a religious faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Automation and the Critique of Abstract Labor in Hegel's Mature
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 12-12-2018 Machine Automation and the Critique of Abstract Labor in Hegel’s Mature Social Theory Matthew J. Delhey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Delhey, Matthew J., "Machine Automation and the Critique of Abstract Labor in Hegel’s Mature Social Theory." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/248 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MACHINE AUTOMATION AND THE CRITIQUE OF ABSTRACT LABOR IN HEGEL’S MATURE SOCIAL THEORY by MATTHEW J. DELHEY Under the Direction of Sebastian Rand, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis examines Hegel’s critique of abstract labor in the Philosophy of Right and the sections on objective spirit in the Encyclopaedia. Against both Frederick Neuhouser’s and Marxist interpretations, I argue that abstract labor, for Hegel, characterizes the specific kind of mechanical labor undertaken in the nineteenth-century factory. Such repetitive labor, Hegel claims, leads to the deadening (Abstumpfung) of the worker through the deforming of her ethical subjectivity, a social pathology he hopes will be resolved by machine automation. By developing two key aspects of Hegel’s social theory—that labor produces ethical subjectivity or education (Bildung) and that this education is the central locus of civil society’s ethicality—I argue that we ought to understand Hegel’s hope for machine automation as a critique of those forms of labor which prevent the worker’s rational participation in the totality of the labor process and thus fail to actualize her social freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel 250—Too Late?
    HEGEL 250—TOO LATE? Ljubljana 2020 HEGEL 250—TOO LATE? ANALECTA Publisher: Društvo za teoretsko psihoanalizo Publishing board: Miran Božovič, Mladen Dolar, Rado Riha, Alenka Zupančič (president), Slavoj Žižek Edited by Mladen Dolar Copyedited by Tanja Dominko and Eric Powell Cover Design by AOOA Layout by Klemen Ulčakar Printed by Ulčakar Grafika First Edition Circulation 200 Ljubljana 2020 This publication has been co-published in partnership with the Goethe-Institut Ljubljana. CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 1Hegel G.W.F.(082) HEGEL 250 - too late? / [edited by Mladen Dolar]. - 1st ed. - Ljubljana : Društvo za teoretsko psihoanalizo : Goethe-Institut, 2020. - (Zbirka Analecta) (Problemi ; let. 58, 11-12) (Problemi International ; 2020, 4) ISBN 978-961-6376-94-5 (Društvo za teoretsko psihoanalizo) COBISS.SI-ID 61238531 Table of Contents Hegel Reborn: A Brief Introduction to HEGEL 250—TOO LATE? Árpád-Andreas Sölter. 5 Hegel’s Time! Ana Jovanović, Bara Kolenc, Urban Šrimpf, Goran Vranešević. 9 Nadia Bou Ali and Ray Brassier After Too Late: The Endgame of Analysis. 11 Mladen Dolar What’s the Time? On Being Too Early or Too Late in Hegel’s Philosophy. 31 Luca Illetteratti Nature’s Externality: Hegel’s Non-Naturalistic Naturalism. .51 Zdravko Kobe The Time of Philosophy: On Hegel’s Conception of Modern Philosophy . 73 Bara Kolenc Is It Too Late?. 91 Christian Krijnen “What, if Anything, Has Not Been Called Philosophizing?” On the Relevance of Hegel’s Conception of a Philosophical History of Philosophy. 119 Gregor Moder What Is To Be Done: On the Theatricality of Power. 143 Nadia Bou Ali and Ray Brassier Sebastian Rödl Thinking Nothing .
    [Show full text]
  • Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts
    Kierke gaard, Literature, and the Arts Engraving, ca. 1837, by Carl Strahlheim showing the Gendarmenmarkt in Berlin, with what was then the Schauspielhaus, or Theater (center)— now the concert house of the Konzerthausorchester Berlin— flanked by the German Cathedral (left) and the French Cathedral (right). Pictured in the background to the immediate right of the theater is the building, still standing today, in which Kierkegaard lodged during his four stays in Berlin, in 1841– 42, 1843, 1845, and 1846. It was there, as noted by a plaque outside, that Kierkegaard wrote the first drafts of Either/Or, Repetition, and Fear and Trembling. Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts Edited by Eric Ziolkowski northwestern university press evanston, illinois Northwestern University Press www.nupress.northwestern.edu Copyright © 2018 by Northwestern University Press. Published 2018. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Ziolkowski, Eric Jozef, 1958– editor. Title: Kierkegaard, literature, and the arts / edited by Eric Ziolkowski. Description: Evanston, Illinois : Northwestern University Press, 2018. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017029795 | ISBN 9780810135970 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780810135963 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780810135987 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Kierkegaard, Søren, 1813–1855. | Kierkegaard, Søren, 1813– 1855—Aesthetics. | Literature—Philosophy. | Music and philosophy. | Art and philosophy. | Performing arts—Philosophy. Classification: LCC B4377 .K4558 2018 | DDC 198.9—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017029795 Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILOSOPHY and RELIGION in GERMAN IDEALISM Studies in German Idealism
    PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION IN GERMAN IDEALISM Studies in German Idealism Series Editor: Reinier Munk, Leiden University and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands Advisory Editorial Board: Frederick Beiser, Syracuse University, U.S.A. George di Giovanni, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Helmut Holzhey, University of Zürich, Switzerland Detlev Pätzold, University of Groningen, The Netherlands Robert Solomon, University of Texas at Austin, Texas, U.S.A. VOLUME 3 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION IN GERMAN IDEALISM Edited by WILLIAM DESMOND Catholic University of Louvain ERNST-OTTO ONNASCH Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and PAUL CRUYSBERGHS Catholic University of Louvain KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS NEW YORK, BOSTON, DORDRECHT, LONDON, MOSCOW eBook ISBN: 1-4020-2325-1 Print ISBN: 1-4020-2324-3 ©2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Print ©2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht All rights reserved No part of this eBook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without written consent from the Publisher Created in the United States of America Visit Springer's eBookstore at: http://ebooks.springerlink.com and the Springer Global Website Online at: http://www.springeronline.com This book is dedicated to Ludwig Heyde (†) CONTENTS Preface ix WILLIAM DESMOND, ERNST-OTTO ONNASCH and PAUL CRUYSBERGHS Introduction xi WALTER JAESCHKE Philosophy of Religion after the Death of God 1 MARTIN MOORS Kant on Religion in the Role of Moral Schematism 21 DANIEL BREAZEALE “Wishful Thinking.” Concerning Fichte’s Interpretation of the Postulates of Reason in his Versuch einer Kritik aller Offenbarung (1792) 35 LUDWIG HEYDE (†) The Unsatisfied Enlightenment. Faith and Pure Insight in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit 71 STEPHEN HOULGATE Religion, Morality and Forgiveness in Hegel’s Philosophy 81 SANDER GRIFFIOEN The Finite does not Hinder.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Authority of Conceptual Analysis in Hegelian
    1 The Authority of Conceptual Analysis in Hegelian Ethical Life [Forthcoming in An Ethical Modernity? Hegel’s Concept of Ethical Life Today – Its Limits and Potential. Eds. Tereza Matějčková and Jiři Chotaš (Brill). Please cite published version] W. Clark Wolf 1. Introduction1 There is among many philosophers a recurring attraction to the idea of philosophy as conceptual analysis: namely, that philosophy has as its aim the clear explication of the central terms governing ordinary and scientific thought. This idea can be traced back even to Plato’s Socrates, who at least initially used dialogues to draw out clearer definitions from his interlocuters of key terms such as virtue, knowledge, and justice. For Plato, at least at one stage, such explication can result in genuine and deep knowledge, even if this is only a more explicit and recollected form of a knowledge that was once merely implicit; he used the concept of forms (eidé) to say what the object of such knowledge is. For later thinkers, especially linguistically minded philosophers of the twentieth century, the attraction of the ‘conceptual conception’ of philosophy was not to credit philosophy with a distinct form of knowledge as much as to distinguish its activity from empirical science. Philosophy was to be regarded not as a first-order inquiry into a special set of rational objects, but a second-order determination of meanings in support of the claims of first- 1 The present version of this paper benefitted from comments and discussion with fellow participants at the conference in Prague. I would especially like to thank Paul Cobben, David James, and Christian Krijnen for valuable discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • And Art's Modernity
    Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics Volume 11, 2019 Edited by Connell Vaughan and Iris Vidmar Jovanović Published by the European Society for Aesthetics esa Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics Founded in 2009 by Fabian Dorsch Internet: http://proceedings.eurosa.org Email: [email protected] ISSN: 1664 – 5278 Editors Connell Vaughan (Technological University Dublin) Iris Vidmar Jovanović (University of Rijeka) Editorial Board Adam Andrzejewski (University of Warsaw) Pauline von Bonsdorff (University of Jyväskylä) Daniel Martine Feige (Stuttgart State Academy of Fine Arts) Tereza Hadravová (Charles University, Prague) Vitor Moura (University of Minho, Guimarães) Regina-Nino Mion (Estonian Academy of Arts, Tallinn) Francisca Pérez Carreño (University of Murcia) Karen Simecek (University of Warwick) Elena Tavani (University of Naples) Publisher The European Society for Aesthetics Department of Philosophy University of Fribourg Avenue de l’Europe 20 1700 Fribourg Switzerland Internet: http://www.eurosa.org Email: [email protected] Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics Volume 11, 2019 Edited by Connell Vaughan and Iris Vidmar Jovanović Table of Contents Lydia Goehr [Keynote Paper] Painting in Waiting Prelude to a Critical Philosophy of History and Art ................................................................ 1 Lucas Amoriello (Non)Identity: Adorno and the Constitution of Art ...... 31 Claire Anscomb Photography, Digital Technology, and Hybrid Art Forms ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel-Aesthetics Sep
    pdf version of the entry Hegel’s Aesthetics http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/hegel-aesthetics/ Hegel's Aesthetics from the Summer 2010 Edition of the First published Tue Jan 20, 2009; substantive revision Tue Dec 15, 2009 Stanford Encyclopedia G.W.F. Hegel's aesthetics, or philosophy of art, forms part of the extraordinarily rich German aesthetic tradition that stretches from J.J. of Philosophy Winckelmann's Thoughts on the Imitation of the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks (1755) and G.E. Lessing's Laocoon (1766) through Immanuel Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790) and Friedrich Schiller's Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man (1795) to Friedrich Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy (1872) and (in the twentieth century) Martin Edward N. Zalta Uri Nodelman Colin Allen John Perry Heidegger's The Origin of the Work of Art (1935–6) and T.W. Adorno's Principal Editor Senior Editor Associate Editor Faculty Sponsor Aesthetic Theory (1970). Hegel was influenced in particular by Editorial Board Winckelmann, Kant and Schiller, and his own thesis of the “end of art” http://plato.stanford.edu/board.html (or what has been taken to be that thesis) has itself been the focus of close Library of Congress Catalog Data attention by Heidegger and Adorno. Hegel's philosophy of art is a wide ISSN: 1095-5054 ranging account of beauty in art, the historical development of art, and Notice: This PDF version was distributed by request to mem- the individual arts of architecture, sculpture, painting, music and poetry. It bers of the Friends of the SEP Society and by courtesy to SEP contains distinctive and influential analyses of Egyptian art, Greek content contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Modal Ontological Argument
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Hegel’s Modal Ontological Argument A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Philosophy Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By David Pensgard Washington, D.C. 2019 Hegel’s Modal Ontological Argument David Pensgard, PhD Director: Antón Barba-Kay, PhD A recent trend in Hegel scholarship has recognized an irreducibly metaphysical component. Unlike traditional metaphysical views, this trend, sometimes referred to as the revised metaphysical view, accepts significant Kantian influence on Hegel, but also sees a rebuttal and counter-critique. Such a Hegel avoids the excesses of traditional metaphysics, including ontotheological speculation, but does not avoid metaphysics altogether. To extend this effort to understand Hegel’s metaphysics, without suggesting an argument for the existence of God, I here point to Hegel’s ontological argument as the one, indispensable interpretational key that he himself has provided for this purpose. Unfortunately, this argument is not only hard to detect because of the way Hegel presents it, but it is also difficult to accept because it takes a very unexpected form; it is a deduction in the ordinary sense. Perhaps without exception, scholars today think that Hegel could not possibly be using a deduction because deductive logic is considered to be antithetical to his project. It is true that Hegel criticized logic’s traditional practice for being dogmatic, and he did detect oppositional themes within the method of deduction itself, but Hegel neither condemned nor abandoned deduction. Instead, he worked to redeem it by purging its practice of two errors: presupposition and finitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel on the Modern Arts Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    HEGEL ON THE MODERN ARTS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Benjamin Rutter | 298 pages | 12 Feb 2015 | CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9781107499669 | English | Cambridge, United Kingdom Hegel on the Modern Arts PDF Book But the precise text of the lectures that Hegel read out is lost. Kant had thought that the aesthetic impulse enables us to sense a kind of harmony implicit in the world between the purposes of morality and those of reason. Of the third part, which is larger than both the others combined, being the treatment of all the Arts in detail, I have given all the important definitions and fundamental ideas, omitting, as was needful, the minute illustrations of the same, and the properly technical part, which, too, can be found elsewhere"--Preface. The question of freedom sits at the forefront of this text, alongside the relation between art and the spirit. Password Please enter your Password. For Greenberg, inspired by Hegel, art was progressing, moving towards, striving towards a perfection in which it had to shed all elements that were impure, such as dimension and representation, until it art evolved into pure abstraction. Author : George R. As a synthesis, Romantic art must be independent and begins to exist on its own. Hegel's Aesthetics further situates his arguments in the intense philosophizing about art among his contemporaries, including Kant, Lessing, Herder, Schelling, and the Schlegel brothers. Hegel does not get involved in any particular movement or style or work of art, but, that said, he was very definite about the kind of art where Beauty could be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Property, Useand Value in Hegel's Philosophy of Right
    CHAPTER 2 Property, Use and Value in Hegel's Philosophy of Right Stephen Houlgate Hegel is aware that it is only in the modern world, with the emergence of civil society, that 'the freedom of property has been recognized here and there as a principle' (PR § 62R).' Nonetheless, he contends, property is made necessary by the very idea of freedom itself The purpose of this essay is to explain why this is the case by tracing the logic that leads in Hegel's Philosophy of Right from freedom, through right, to property and its use. I conclude by briefly comparing Hegel and Marx on the topic of 'value'. FreeWill and Right The first task is to explain why freedom, or the free will, must give itself the form of right (Recht). What Hegel calls 'intelligence' is the knowing of what is (PM § 465). Will, in contrast, seeks to realize, and realizes, its subjective aims in the external world. It is, therefore, the activity of giving objective 'existence' (Existenz) to the content of its aims (PR § 8; PM § 469).2 Insofar as will actively objectifies itself in this way, it is 'self-determining' and free. Initially, however, its aims are determined by nature, rather than by itself: they are its immediately given needs, drives and inclinations. Accordingly, Hegel maintains, will is at first not fully free, but free only implicitly or 'in itself' (an sich) (PR §§ IO-II; PM §§ 471-475). Will is, however, explicitly free, or free 'for itself', insofar as it dis- tinguishes itself in thought from its given drives and inclinations and understands itself to be the power to choose which aims it will realize: the , See also PR § 18zA, and VRP 3: 565, 641.
    [Show full text]