The Art of Hegel's Aesthetics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Art of Hegel's Aesthetics PAUL A. KOTTMAN AND MICHAEL SQUIRE (EDS.) THE ART OF HEGEL’S AESTHETICS Hegelian Philosophy and the Perspectives of Art History MORPHOMATA This volume explores one of modernity’s most profound and far-reaching philosophies of art: the Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, delivered by Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel in the 1820s. The book has two overriding objectives: first, to ask how Hegel’s work illuminates specific periods and artworks in light of contemporary art-historical discussions; second, to explore how art history helps us make better sense and use of Hegelian aesthetics. In bringing together a range of internationally acclaimed critical voices, the volume establishes an important disciplinary bridge between aesthetics and art history. Given the recent resurgence of interest in ‘global’ art history, and calls for more comparative approaches to ‘visual culture’, contributors ask what role Hegel has played within the field – and what role he could play in the future. What can a historical treatment of art ac- complish? How should we explain the ‘need’ for certain artistic forms at different historical junctures? Has art history been ‘Hegelian’ without fully acknowledging it? Indeed, have art historians shirked some of the funda- mental questions that Hegel raised? KOTTMAN, SQUIRE (EDS.) – THE ART OF HEGEL’S AESTHETICS MORPHOMATA EDITED BY GÜNTER BLAMBERGER AND DIETRICH BOSCHUNG VOLUME 39 EDITED BY PAUL A. KOTTMAN AND MICHAEL SQUIRE THE ART OF HEGEL’S AESTHETICS Hegelian Philosophy and the Perspectives of Art History WILHELM FINK unter dem Förderkennzeichen 01UK1505. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt der Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autoren. Bibliografische Informationen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen National­ biblio grafie; detaillierte Daten sind im Internet über www.dnb.d­nb.de abrufbar. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Dieses Werk sowie einzelne Teile desselben sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen ist ohne vorherige schriftliche Zustimmung des Verlags nicht zulässig. © 2018 Wilhelm Fink Verlag, ein Imprint der Brill­Gruppe (Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, Niederlande; Brill USA Inc., Boston MA, USA; Brill Asia Pte Ltd, Singapore; Brill Deutschland GmbH, Paderborn, Deutschland) Internet: www.fink.de Umschlaggestaltung und Entwurf Innenseiten: Sichtvermerk, Kathrin Roussel Satz: Sichtvermerk, Kathrin Roussel und Philipp Brillinger Printed in Germany Herstellung: Brill Deutschland GmbH, Paderborn ISBN 978-3-7705-6285-5 CONTENTS Acknowledgments 7 Note on editions and abbreviations 10 List of black and white illustrations (Figures) 13 List of colour illustrations (Plates) 20 MICHAEL SQUIRE Introduction: Hegel and art history 23 WHITNEY DAVIS The Absolute in the mirror: Symbolic art and cosmological perspectivism 69 JULIA PETERS Hegel on Spirit, nature and the function of classical art 101 MICHAEL SQUIRE Unser Knie beugen wir doch nicht mehr? Hegel, classical art and the Reformation of art history 125 FRED RUSH Still life and the end of painting 159 HANNEKE GROOTENBOER The self­conscious image: Painting and Hegel’s idea of reflection 189 ROBERT PIPPIN Hegel on painting 211 T.J. CLARK Beauty lacks strength: Hegel and the art of his century 239 PAUL A. KOTTMAN Hegel and Shakespeare on the pastness of art 263 INGVILD TORSEN The future of Hegelian art history: On the body in late modern sculpture 303 SEBASTIAN GARDNER Art’s loss of vocation: Hegel and Philosophical Romanticism 331 PAUL A. KOTTMAN Envoi: The art of Hegel’s aesthetics 365 Notes on contributors 383 Plates 391 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The origins of this book lie in a series of conversations between the two editors. From October 2014 to March 2015, we both held concurrent fel­ lowships at the Morphomata International Center for Advanced Studies – Genesis, Dynamics and Mediality of Cultural Figurations, University of Cologne: housed in neighbouring apartments (at the university guest­ house on Behringstraße), and working in adjacent offices, we began to talk through all aspects of Cologne life. As topics moved from German politics and the looming ‘Brexit’ vote to our own academic work, a shared interest in the history of aesthetics quickly emerged. Fuelled by copious amounts of Earl Grey tea, our talk soon began to home in upon Hegel. Neither of us could claim to have got to grips with all aspects of the Lectures on Aesthetics; indeed, it was clear that we had rather different approaches, and not altogether similar assessments of what a ‘Hegelian’ worldview looked like (or for that matter its appeal). We nonetheless shared a fundamental respect for Hegel’s approach: unlike so many modern­day academics, Hegel was able to sieve through the details so as to formulate those all­ important, bigger­picture questions. As our discussions developed – and various points of agreement, discrepancy and confusion crystallised – we began to involve others in our conversations. We soon hit upon the idea of an experimental, in­ ternational workshop – an occasion to bring together philosophers, art historians and critics. Our plan was always to involve a range of partici­ pants, with expertise spanning the entire width and breadth of Hegel’s art historical account. Some of our collaborators would be internationally renowned Hegelian experts; others would be invited precisely because we were unsure about what their contribution would be (and we were curious to find out …). We attempted to identify speakers from differ­ ent academic backgrounds and countries; we likewise wanted to strike a balance between established and younger scholars, in the hope that our motley crew would reflect the past, present and future of their disciplines. 8 The workshop took place at King’s College London from 8–10 June 2016, convened under the auspices of the Centre of Hellenic Studies (part of the King’s Arts and Humanities Research Institute).1 Financial support came from a number of different quarters: in addition to seed­funding from King’s College London and the New School (the New School for Social Research and Eugene Lang College and the New School for Liberal Arts), we received generous funding from both the Leverhulme Trust and the Morphomata International Center for Advanced Studies. Organisational assistance was likewise offered on both sides of the Channel – above all, from Alex Creighton (in London), and from Thierry Greub and Semra Mägele (in Cologne). It is a pleasure to thank numerous others who also added to the workshop’s success: in particular, Ian Jenkins – who, as Senior Curator, organised a special ‘Hegelian’ tour of the British Museum and a closing reception in the Department of Greece and Rome. We are also grate­ ful to those who introduced, chaired and responded to sessions – Roderick Beaton, Dietrich Boschung, Jaś Elsner, William Fitzgerald, Simon Goldhill, Sacha Golob, Russell Goulbourne, Katharina Lorenz, Sebastian Matzner, Stephen Melville, Jeremy Tanner and Joanna Woodall. We had little inkling that a conference on ‘The Art of Hegel’s Aesthet­ ics’ would spark the interest that it did. In total, we were able to accom­ modate up to 150 people within the ‘River Room’ at King’s. But it quickly became apparent that many more wanted to join our conversation: there was a waiting list of almost twice that number, and many other interested scholars contacted us by email. It was for this reason that we decided to transform the workshop – which was always intended to air ideas and to prompt discussion – into the edited volume at hand. Papers have been lightly revised to fit the published format, but we have tried to keep the informal and experimental thinking that spurred the original gathering. Predictably, the published volume has had to proceed without all the contributors who were originally invited to London: although the final book cannot include their chapters, we much look forward to reading elsewhere the papers by Joshua Billings (‘Hegel’s tragic poets’), Lydia Goehr (‘Mono­ chromy and monotony: On the colour and tone of the absolute in Hegel’s Aesthetics’), Ludwig Jäger (‘Zeichen/Künste: Der semiologische Subtext der Hegelschen Ästhetik’) and Richard Neer (‘Hegel and the classical’). 1 For further information – and a hyperlink to a video of the opening session of the workshop – see www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/ahri/eventrecords/2015–2016/ CHS/hegel.aspx. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 9 We end by adding three additional words of thanks. First and fore­ most, we are grateful to all the volume’s contributors, who engaged with the editors – and most importantly with each other – with such warmth, comradery and enthusiasm. Second, it is a pleasure to thank Dietrich Boschung (co­director of the Morphomata International Center for Ad­ vanced Studies), whose support and encouragement have been fundamen­ tal throughout. Third and finally, we thank those who helped with the practical production of the volume: Thierry Greub for liaising with the press; Mary Morton, for her assistance with copy­editing; and Kathrin Roussel of Sichtvermerk, for typesetting the volume with characteristic care, patience and attention to detail. It was never our intention that this project should advance some sort of ‘party line’, still less that it should aim at offering any ‘last word’. Rather, the variety of perspectives reflected in this book – as indeed the range of evaluative responses to Hegelian aesthetics – continues the spirit of our original discussions in Cologne. Whether or not one believes Hegel’s dictum that ‘art is and remains a thing of the past’, we very much hope that our conversations about Hegelian aesthetics will stretch long into the future. Michael Squire (London) & Paul A. Kottman (New York) 10 NOTE ON EDITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS One of the difficulties in working on the text of Hegel’s aesthetics is that there is in fact no ‘text’ to speak of. The Lectures on Aesthetics – or Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik – were never published during Hegel’s lifetime.1 Hegel did commit part of his thinking about the history of aesthetics to print (above all, in sections 556–563 of his 1830 Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissen schaften im Grundrisse).
Recommended publications
  • A Theoretical Analysis of ISIS Indoctrination and Recruitment
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 12-2016 A Theoretical Analysis of ISIS Indoctrination and Recruitment Trevor Hawkins California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all Part of the Other Political Science Commons, Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Other Sociology Commons, Political Theory Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Psychology Commons, and the Theory and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Hawkins, Trevor, "A Theoretical Analysis of ISIS Indoctrination and Recruitment" (2016). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 7. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/7 This Capstone Project (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects and Master's Theses at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: ISIS RECRUITMENT A Theoretical Analysis of ISIS Indoctrination and Recruitment Tactics Trevor W. Hawkins California State University of Monterey Bay SBS: 402 Capstone II Professor Juan Jose Gutiérrez, Ph.d. Professor Gerald Shenk, Ph.d. Professor Jennifer Lucido, M.A. December 2016 ISIS RECRUITMENT 2 Table of Contents Abstract 3 Introduction 4 Theoretical Framework 6 Influence Psychology 6 Cult Indoctrination 7 Soviet Montage Theory 7 Methodology 8 Execution of Cult Indoctrination Paradigm 9 Execution of Soviet Montage Paradigm 9 Use of Analysis Technology 10 Literature Review 10 I. The Production of Reality Objective Reality 10 Moral Reality 12 Reality of the Self 13 Moral Reality in Context 14 Objective Reality in Context 15 As Context Becomes Reality 16 II.
    [Show full text]
  • ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah TRENDS WORKING PAPER 6/2015
    ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah TRENDS WORKING PAPER 6/2015 Amaryllis Georges TRENDS Research & Advisory ISIS rhetoric for the creation of the Ummah TRENDS Research & Advisory is a progressive research center that aims to help improve policy and decision-making process through research and analysis. The conclusions and recommendations of any TRENDS publications are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. P.O. Box 110450, Abu Dhabi, UAE www.trendsinstitution.org 2 TRENDS Research & Advisory ISIS rhetoric for the creation of the Ummah TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………4 2 Critical Discourse Analysis……………………………………………………………………………5 3 Study of Al-Baghdadi’s Sermon……………………………………………………………………6 4 Analysis of frequently used words & phrases in Al-Baghdadi’s sermon………18 5 Concluding Remarks…………………………………………………………………………….….…20 6 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………20 3 TRENDS Research & Advisory ISIS rhetoric for the creation of the Ummah Introduction Discourse forms and shapes itself to create and reflect our social world. Therefore, language cannot be measured as neutral (Wijsen, 2012, p. 77). Not only does it outline, regulate and strengthen our understanding of the world, but language also sets out the actions accessible to us, while eliminating and delegitimizing other worldviews (Wijsen, 2012, p. 71). In this respect discourse serves as an instrument of influence and control often used by groups motivated for power to generate and preserve hegemonic regimes (Fairclough, 1992). The purpose of this paper is to examine the linguistic strategy employed by ISIS as a means through which it constructs the notion of the Muslim Ummah (Muslim community), which seeks to lay emphasis on the unity of an international Muslim community based off the supremacy of Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television the Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television
    The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television Edited by Michael Hauskeller University of Exeter, UK Thomas D. Philbeck World Economic Forum, Switzerland Curtis D. Carbonell Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research, UAE Selection and editorial matter © Michael Hauskeller, Thomas D. Philbeck and Curtis D. Carbonell 2015 Individual chapters © Respective authors 2015 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2015 978-1-137-43031-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Collisions with Hegel in Bertolt Brecht's Early Materialism DISSERTATIO
    “Und das Geistige, das sehen Sie, das ist nichts.” Collisions with Hegel in Bertolt Brecht’s Early Materialism DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jesse C. Wood, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Germanic Languages and Literatures The Ohio State University 2012 Committee Members: John Davidson, Advisor Bernd Fischer Bernhard Malkmus Copyright by Jesse C. Wood 2012 Abstract Bertolt Brecht began an intense engagement with Marxism in 1928 that would permanently shape his own thought and creative production. Brecht himself maintained that important aspects resonating with Marxist theory had been central, if unwittingly so, to his earlier, pre-1928 works. A careful analysis of his early plays, poetry, prose, essays, and journal entries indeed reveals a unique form of materialism that entails essential components of the dialectical materialism he would later develop through his understanding of Marx; it also invites a similar retroactive application of other ideas that Brecht would only encounter in later readings, namely those of the philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Initially a direct result of and component of his discovery of Marx, Brecht’s study of Hegel would last throughout the rest of his career, and the influence of Hegel has been explicitly traced in a number Brecht’s post-1928 works. While scholars have discovered proto-Marxist traces in his early work, the possibilities of the young Brecht’s affinities with the idealist philosopher have not been explored. Although ultimately an opposition between the idealist Hegel and the young Bürgerschreck Brecht is to be expected, one finds a surprising number of instances where the two men share an unlikely commonality of imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Course Outline in PDF Format
    POLS 3040.6 Modern Political Thought 2010/11 Course Website: http://moodle10.yorku.ca You will need your Passport York to sign in, then you will be directed to POLS 3040.6 course website. Class Time: Wednesday 11:30-14:30 Class Location: TEL 1005 Professor: Shannon Bell Office Location: S 634 Ross E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.arts.yorku.ca/politics/shanbell/index.html Telephone Office: 416 2100 ext. 22552 Office Hours: Tues 15:00-17:00 Mobile: 416 822 6831 Wed 15:00-17:00 Course Description POLS 3040.6 Modern Political Thought meshes political theory with digital imagery. The course operationalizes Gilles Deleuze claim that philosophical concepts are like sounds, images and colors. This will be accomplished through digital image/sound production of theoretical concepts. Film images, which I have videoed will accompany each lecture. Course requirements include two short film productions relating to a theoretical concept; the films accompany the two essays. I have scheduled extra office hours to assist with the film aspect of the course which is 15% of the grade. It is assumed that people do not have any film experience. The idea is to transpose Martin Heidegger’s claim regarding technology, ‘that you can’t think technology technologically,’ to the techne of political thought. The argument is that you can’t think political theory simply with language, that is, inside the sayable in which it is produced. Heidegger contended that the site from which to think technology is art. POLS 3040 uses visual images to supplement and enhance philosophical concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Site/Non-Site Explores the Relationship Between the Two Genres Which the Master of Aix-En- Provence Cultivated with the Same Passion: Landscapes and Still Lifes
    site / non-site CÉZANNE site / non-site Guillermo Solana Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid February 4 – May 18, 2014 Fundación Colección Acknowledgements Thyssen-Bornemisza Board of Trustees President The Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza Hervé Irien José Ignacio Wert Ortega wishes to thank the following people Philipp Kaiser who have contributed decisively with Samuel Keller Vice-President their collaboration to making this Brian Kennedy Baroness Carmen Thyssen-Bornemisza exhibition a reality: Udo Kittelmann Board Members María Alonso Perrine Le Blan HRH the Infanta Doña Pilar de Irina Antonova Ellen Lee Borbón Richard Armstrong Arnold L. Lehman José María Lassalle Ruiz László Baán Christophe Leribault Fernando Benzo Sáinz Mr. and Mrs. Barron U. Kidd Marina Loshak Marta Fernández Currás Graham W. J. Beal Glenn D. Lowry HIRH Archduchess Francesca von Christoph Becker Akiko Mabuchi Habsburg-Lothringen Jean-Yves Marin Miguel Klingenberg Richard Benefield Fred Bidwell Marc Mayer Miguel Satrústegui Gil-Delgado Mary G. Morton Isidre Fainé Casas Daniel Birnbaum Nathalie Bondil Pia Müller-Tamm Rodrigo de Rato y Figaredo Isabella Nilsson María de Corral López-Dóriga Michael Brand Thomas P. Campbell Nils Ohlsen Artistic Director Michael Clarke Eriko Osaka Guillermo Solana Caroline Collier Nicholas Penny Marcus Dekiert Ann Philbin Managing Director Lionel Pissarro Evelio Acevedo Philipp Demandt Jean Edmonson Christine Poullain Secretary Bernard Fibicher Earl A. Powell III Carmen Castañón Jiménez Gerhard Finckh HSH Prince Albert II of Monaco Giancarlo Forestieri William Robinson Honorary Director Marsha Rojas Tomàs Llorens David Franklin Matthias Frehner Alejandra Rossetti Peter Frei Katy Rothkopf Isabel García-Comas Klaus Albrecht Schröder María García Yelo Dieter Schwarz Léonard Gianadda Sir Nicholas Serota Karin van Gilst Esperanza Sobrino Belén Giráldez Nancy Spector Claudine Godts Maija Tanninen-Mattila Ann Goldstein Baroness Thyssen-Bornemisza Michael Govan Charles L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter #4
    Cover Page DarkIssue Four Matter July 2011 SF, Fantasy & Art [email protected] Dark Matter Issue Four July 2011 SF, Fantasy & Art [email protected] Dark Matter Contents: Issue 4 Dark Matter Stuff 1 News & Articles 7 Gun Laws & Cosplay 7 Troopertrek 2011 8 Hugo Award Nominees 10 2010 Aurealis Awards 14 2011 Aurealis Awards to be held in Sydney again 15 2011 Ditmar Awards 16 2011 Chronos Awards 20 Renovation WorldCon 22 Iron Sky update 28 Art by Ben Grimshaw 30 Ebony Rattle as Electra, Art by Ben Grimshaw 31 The Girl in the Red Hood is Back … But She’s a Little Different 32 Launching & Gaining Velocity 34 Geek and Nerd 35 Peacemaker - A Comic Book 36 Continuum 7 Report 38 Starcraft 2 - Prae.ThorZain 46 Good Friday Appeal 50 FAQ about the writing of Machine Man, by Max Barry 65 J. Michael Straczynski says... 67 Interviews 69 Kevin J. Anderson talks to Dark Matter 69 Tom Taylor and Colin Wilson talk to Dark Matter 78 Simon Morden talks to Dark Matter 106 Paul Bedford talks to Dark Matter 115 Cathy Larsen talks to Dark Matter 131 Madeleine Roux talks to Daniel Haynes 142 Chewbacca is Coming 146 Greg Gates talks to Dark Matter 153 Richard Harland talks to Dark Matter 165 Letters 173 Anime/Animation 176 The Sacred Blacksmith Collection 176 Summer Wars 177 Evangelion 1.11 You are [not] alone 178 Evangelion 2.22 You can [not] advance 179 Book Reviews 180 The Razor Gate 180 Angelica 181 2 issue four The Map of Time 182 Die for Me 183 The Gathering 184 The Undivided 186 the twilight saga: the official illustrated guide 188 Rivers
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel and Marx on Alienation a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University By
    HEGEL AND MARX ON ALIENATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SEVGİ DOĞAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FEBRUARY 2008 Approval of the Graduate School of (Name of the Graduate School) Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts of Philosophy. Assist. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan (METU, PHIL) Assist. Prof. Dr. Elif Çırakman (METU, PHIL) Assist. Prof. Dr. Çetin Türkyılmaz (Hacettepe U., PHIL) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Sevgi Doğan Signature : iii ABSTRACT HEGEL AND MARX ON ALIENATION Doğan, Sevgi M.A., Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Barış Parkan February 2008, 139 pages Is alienation a process of self-discovery or is it a loss of reality? The subject of this thesis is how alienation is discussed in Hegel and Marx’s philosophies in terms of this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Video Science: Cinema As Sense Organ Rosalynn Stovall Washington University in St Louis, [email protected]
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Graduate School of Art Theses Graduate School of Art Spring 5-16-2014 Video Science: Cinema as Sense Organ Rosalynn Stovall Washington University in St Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/samfox_art_etds Part of the Art and Design Commons Recommended Citation Stovall, Rosalynn, "Video Science: Cinema as Sense Organ" (2014). Graduate School of Art Theses. ETD 11. https://doi.org/10.7936/ K7QJ7F7F. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School of Art at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate School of Art Theses by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Video Science: Cinema as Sense Organ by Rosalynn Stovall A thesis presented to the Sam Fox School ofDesign & Visual Arts Washington University in St. Louis In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master ofFine Arts Thesis Advisor Monika Weiss, Associate Professor of Art Primary Advisors Monika Weiss, Associate Professor of Art Zlatko Cosic, Lecturer of Art Graduate Committee Cheryl Wassenaar, Associate Professor of Art Ila Sheren, Assistant Professor of Art History and Archaeology Stovall 1 Abstract The moving image exists at the interstice of art and science not only because it acts as a representation of human sight but also because it exemplifies the observational processes related to the scientific gaze. As such, film and video have extended human sense-perception properties by mimicking and manipulating the natural processes of the optic nerve.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Introduction to Aesthetics
    Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics 1 Karsten Harries Hegel's Introduction to Aesthetics Fall Semester 2009 Yale University Copyright Karsten Harries Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics 2 Contents 1. Introduction: Hegel on the Death of Art 3 2. Danto on the End of Art 15 3. Art and Nature 37 4. Art and Theory 50 5. Towards a Science of Art 60 6. The Work of Art as an Artifact 78 7. The Sensuousness of Art 85 8. Art and Imitation 96 9. Why Art in a Needy Age? 104 10. Hegel and his Predecessors 119 11. Irony 128 12. The Division of the Arts 137 13. Conclusion: The History and End of Art 148 Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics 3 1. Introduction: Hegel on the Death of Art 1 In the Spring semester of 2008 I taught, for the last time, a seminar on Heidegger's The Origin of the Work of Art. A reworked version of my class notes has just been published as a book by Springer.1 In my mind that seminar and this seminar on Hegel, while they do not depend on each other, belong together. What joins them is most fundamentally the question of the place of art in the modern world. Both seminars are part of an attempt to work out in more detail the concluding chapter of my The Ethical Function of Architecture,2 which confronts Hegel with Heidegger. What is at issue in this confrontation is hinted at by some remarks Heidegger makes in the Epilogue to The Origin of the Work of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Naturalism and the Market God David Timothy Denenny Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Theses Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2018 Cultural Naturalism and the Market God David Timothy Denenny Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Denenny, David Timothy, "Cultural Naturalism and the Market God" (2018). Theses. 2464. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2464 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CULTURAL NATURALISM AND THE MARKET GOD by David Denenny B.A. Eastern Washington University, 2015 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree Department of Philosophy in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale December 2018 Copyright by David Denenny, 2018 All Rights Reserved THESIS APPROVAL CULTURAL NATURALISM AND THE MARKET GOD by David Denenny A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the field of Philosophy Approved by: Kenneth William Stikkers, Chair Randall Auxier Alfred Frankowski Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale November 8, 2018 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF David Denenny, for the Master of Arts degree in Philosophy, presented on November 8, 2018, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: CULTURAL NATURALISM AND THE MARKET GOD MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Kenneth William Stikkers This work employs John Dewey's cultural naturalism to explore how and why the orthodox economic tradition functions as a religious faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Automation and the Critique of Abstract Labor in Hegel's Mature
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 12-12-2018 Machine Automation and the Critique of Abstract Labor in Hegel’s Mature Social Theory Matthew J. Delhey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Delhey, Matthew J., "Machine Automation and the Critique of Abstract Labor in Hegel’s Mature Social Theory." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/248 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MACHINE AUTOMATION AND THE CRITIQUE OF ABSTRACT LABOR IN HEGEL’S MATURE SOCIAL THEORY by MATTHEW J. DELHEY Under the Direction of Sebastian Rand, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis examines Hegel’s critique of abstract labor in the Philosophy of Right and the sections on objective spirit in the Encyclopaedia. Against both Frederick Neuhouser’s and Marxist interpretations, I argue that abstract labor, for Hegel, characterizes the specific kind of mechanical labor undertaken in the nineteenth-century factory. Such repetitive labor, Hegel claims, leads to the deadening (Abstumpfung) of the worker through the deforming of her ethical subjectivity, a social pathology he hopes will be resolved by machine automation. By developing two key aspects of Hegel’s social theory—that labor produces ethical subjectivity or education (Bildung) and that this education is the central locus of civil society’s ethicality—I argue that we ought to understand Hegel’s hope for machine automation as a critique of those forms of labor which prevent the worker’s rational participation in the totality of the labor process and thus fail to actualize her social freedom.
    [Show full text]