DOCSLIB.ORG

PM Human Evolution 29 HEADS 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

29 World Heritage papers ( HEADS ) SERIES 29 World Heritage papers • Evolución Humana Human Evolution Human HEADSWORLD HERITAGE1 Human Evolution: Adaptations, Dispersals and Social Developments (HEADS) World Heritage Thematic Programme Evolución Humana: Adaptaciones, Migraciones y Desarrollos Sociales Programa Temático de Patrimonio Mundial For more information contact: papers UNESCO World Heritage Centre 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : 33 (0)1 45 68 15 71 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail : [email protected] World Heritage http://whc.unesco.org Design by RectoVerso Human Evolution: Adaptations, Dispersals and Social Developments (HEADS) World Heritage Thematic Programme Evolución Humana: Adaptaciones, Migraciones y Desarrollos Sociales Programa Temático de Patrimonio Mundial Table of Contents • Índice Editors: In Memoriam of María Jesús San Segundo Page 6 Nuria Sanz, UNESCO World Heritage Centre En memoria de María Jesús San Segundo Penelope Keenan, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Nuria Sanz Coordination of the World Heritage Papers Series: Foreword • Prólogo Page 8 Vesna Vujicic Lugassy, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Francesco Bandarin Cover photos: Preface • Prefacio Page 10 Top: uKhahlamba/Drakensberg Park (WHL), South Africa. Photo: Frans Prins Kishore Rao from left to right: • Cueva de las Manos, Río Pinturas, Argentina. © WHC/UNESCO • The Tabon Cave Complex and all of Lipuun excavation. Photo: Eusabio Z.Dizon • Hohle Fels Venus. Photo: H.Jensen. © University of Tübingen • Fossil Hominid Preface • Prefacio Page 12 Sites of Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, Kromdraai, and Environs (WHL), South Africa. Photo: Nuria Sanz (UNESCO) Ángeles Albert de León Photos and images presented in the texts are the copyrights of the authors unless otherwise indicated. Introduction • Introducción Page 14 Nuria Sanz Published in June 2011 by UNESCO World Heritage Centre. World Heritage of Human Evolution and the commitment of International Cooperation Page 14 El Patrimonio Mundial de la evolucion humana y el compromiso de la cooperacion internacional Page 34 Disclaimer The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not Human Evolution: Adaptations, Dispersals and Social Developments (HEADS) Page 57 imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Processes and Outcomes Page 58 Renuncia de responsabilidad Las opiniones aquí expresadas son responsabilidad de los autores, las cuales no necesariamente reflejan las de la UNESCO y no comprometen a la Organización. La terminología utilizada y la forma en que se presenta la información en esta pub- Action Plan on HEADS 2 Page 65 licación no suponen juicio alguno de la UNESCO respecto de la condición jurídica de ningún país, territorio, ciudad o región, o de sus autoridades, ni respecto del trazado de sus fronteras o límites. Conclusions and Recommendations 3 Page 73 Human Evolution and the World Heritage Convention Page 74 Burgos, Spain, 21 to 25 March 2009 Rock Art and the World Heritage Convention Page 79 uKhahlamba/Drakensberg Park, South Africa, 3 to 8 April 2009 Prehistoric Properties and the World Heritage Convention Page 86 © UNESCO / 2011 Manama Bahrain, 10 to 14 May 2009 The Implementation of the Action Plan, Scientific Working Group Page 95 UNESCO World Heritage Centre UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 12 to 14 September 2009 7, place de Fontenoy Action Plan Scientific Working Group Page 98 75352 Paris 07 SP France UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 17 to 18 May 2010 Tel : 33 (0)1 42 68 15 71 World Rock Art Archive Working Group Page 100 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 5 to 6 July 2010 E-mail : [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org World Rock Art Archive Working Group Page 106 Johannesburg, South Africa, 17 to 19 November 2010 African Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention Page 109 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 8 to 11 February 2011 Preparation of the Management Plan for Tchitundo-Hulu Rock Art site Page 118 Virei, Angola, 14 to 23 March 2011 HEADS Scientific Working Group 4 Page 119 World Heritage and the evolution of modern human behaviour Page 120 Nicolas Conard Rock art and hunter-gatherer communities in relation to World Heritage Page 145 Janette Deacon Early origins of agriculture and World Heritage: the role of Asia Page 172 Ofer Bar-Yosef Paleo-landscapes and vulnerability in the framework of the World Heritage Convention Page 190 Margherita Mussi Attending lessons from human evolution-related sites in the context of World Heritage Page 202 Francois Sémah ANNEXES Melka Kunture, Simbiro, Ethiopia. Photo: Nuria Sanz Page 222 List of Participants Page 227 Meeting Agendas • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France, • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France, November 2008 November 2008 • Burgos, Spain, March 2009 • Burgos, Spain, March 2009 • uKhahlamba/Drakensberg Park, • uKhahlamba/Drakensberg Park, South Africa, April 2009 South Africa, April 2009 • Manama, Bahrain, May 2009 • Manama, Bahrain, May 2009 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, September 2009 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, September 2009 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, October 2009 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, December 2009 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, December 2009 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, May 2010 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, May 2010 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, July 2010 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, July 2010 • Johannesburg, South Africa, November 2010 • Johannesburg, South Africa, November 2010 • Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, February 2011 • UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, December 2010 • Virei, Angola, March 2011 • Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, February 2011 • Virei, Angola, March 2011 5 In Memoriam of En memoria de María Jesús San Segundo María Jesús San Segundo S. Excma. Sra. María Jesús San Segundo, Presidenta de la 33a Sesión del Comité de Patrimonio Mundial, Sevilla, España, María Jesús San Segundo de 22 a 30 de Junio de 2009. Foto: UNESCO/WHC María Jesús San Segundo came to UNESCO as Ambassador and Representative of Spain to UNESCO in January María Jesús Sansegundo, llega a UNESCO como Embajadora, Representante de España, en Enero de 2008. Por 2008. By that time her academic career had followed a systematic, solid and orderly course, very much aquel entonces su carrera académica había recorrido todos los peldaños de un currículo sistemático, sólido y reflecting her character. After receiving her Ph.D from Princeton in 1985, she had been a lecturer, professor, ordenado, vivo retrato de su carácter. Desde recibir su doctorado en Princeton en 1985, fue profesora, cate- Deputy Rector and Minister of Education and Science in Spain. Every step in her career bore witness to her drática, Vicerrectora y Ministra de Educación y Ciencia de España. Cada tramo de su carrera fue avalando su determination and firmness of purpose in defence of education systems capable of building fairer and freer determinación y constancia en la defensa de sistemas educativos capaces de construir sociedades más justas societies. y libres. Her experience in fields such as the financing of education or the evaluation of education systems did not Temas de su experiencia como la financiación de la Educación o la evaluación de sistemas educativos no em- affect her unremitting predisposition to advocate an enriching approach to science in every one of the sub- pañaron una predisposición constante por reclamar un acercamiento fecundo a la ciencia en todos y cada jects that she was called on to deal with in our Organization. In the case of Human Evolution, far from being uno de los temas que le tocó abordar en nuestra institución. El caso de la Evolución Humana, lejos de ser ‘just one of the programmes’ immediately became one of her favourite projects. I remember the meeting «uno de los programas» se convirtió inmediatamente en uno de sus proyectos favoritos. Recuerdo la reunión where we discussed the aspects that Spain would be proposing to address during the Spanish Chair of the en la que se discutía sobre los aspectos que España iba a proponer desarrollar durante la Presidencia del World Heritage Committee. Her conviction of the rightness of promoting a multidisciplinary dialogue to Comité de Patrimonio Mundial. Su convencimiento sobre la pertinencia de avanzar una reflexión multidisci- deliberate on what it is that makes us culturally, anatomically and intellectually human persuaded everyone plinar para deliberar sobre lo que nos hace humanos, cultural, anatómica e intelectualmente, persuadió a that UNESCO was where that debate should take place. todos de que UNESCO era el solar de esa reflexión. I had the opportunity to work closely with her. The HEADS Programme and the work of World Heritage prof- Tuve ocasión de trabajar con ella de forma cercana. El programa HEADS y los trabajos de Patrimonio Mundial ited from her conciliatory attitude. She was a firm advocate of multilateralism and an enthusiastic defender se beneficiaron de su actitud conciliadora. Era una convencida del multilateralismo y entusiasta defensora of the 1972 Convention goals. We enjoyed her company and we profited from her far-sightedness and counsel de los objetivos de la Convención del 72. Disfrutamos de su compañía y nos beneficiamos de su visión y con- in Paris, Spain, South Africa, Brazil and in numerous other
Recommended publications
  • Art in the Stone Age Terminology

    Art in the Stone Age Terminology

    Art in the Stone Age Terminology ● Paleolithic- (Greek) ○ Paleo-Old ○ Lithos-Stone. ○ 40,000-9,000BCE ○ Characteristics, Hunter Gatherer, Caves. Migration ● Mesolithic, ○ Meso-Middle ○ Lithos- Stone Age ○ 10,000-5,000 bce ○ Characteristics, Beginnings of Cities, Dog Domestication, Transition to agricultural and animal domestication ● Neolithic, ○ Neo-New ○ Lithos-Stone ○ 8,000-2300 BCE ○ Development of Cities, Animal Husbandry Herding, Agriculture, People Began to stay in one place Mistakes in Art History The saying Goes.. “History is Written by the victors.” Niccolo Machiavelli Mercator Map Projection. https://youtu.be/KUF_Ckv8HbE http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2016/01/21/463835225/discovery-of- ancient-massacre-suggests-war-predated- settlements Radio Carbon Dating https://youtu.be/54e5Bz7m3do A process Archaeologists use among others to estimate how long ago an artifact was made. Makapansgat Face Pebble resembling a face, Makapansgat, ca. 3,000,000 bce. This pebble of one of the earliest examples of representation of the human form. Apollo 11 Cave Animal facing left, from the Apollo 11 Cave, Namibia, ca. 23,000bce. Charcoal on stone, 5”x4.25”. State Museum of Namibia, Windhoek. Scientists between 1969-1972 scientists working in the Apollo 11 Cave in Namibia found seven fragments of painted stone plaques, transportable. The approximate date of the charcoal from the archeological layer containing the Namibian plaques is 23,000bce. Hohlenstein-Stadel Human with feline (Lion?) head, from Hohlenstein-Stadel Germany, ca 40,000- 35,000BCE Appox 12” in length this artifact was carved from ivory from a mammoth tusk This object was originally thought to be of 30,000bce, was pushed back in time due to additional artifacts found later on the same excavation layer.
  • Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And

    Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And

    Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland) Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse To cite this version: Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse. Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Elsevier, 2020, 58, pp.101170. 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101170. hal-03051558 HAL Id: hal-03051558 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03051558 Submitted on 10 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 58 (2020) 101170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis T (3100–1600 BC,
  • Zooarchaeological and Taphonomic Perspectives on Hominid And

    Zooarchaeological and Taphonomic Perspectives on Hominid And

    ZOOARCHAEOLOGICAL AND TAPHONOMIC PERSPECTIVES ON HOMINID AND CARNIVORE INTERACTIONS AT OLDUVAI GORGE, TANZANIA Charles Peter Egeland Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology, Indiana University June 2007 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee ________________________ Travis R. Pickering, Ph.D. ________________________ Nicholas Toth, Ph.D. ________________________ Kathy Schick, Ph.D. ________________________ Kevin Hunt, Ph.D. ________________________ Claudia Johnson, Ph.D. June 8, 2007 ii ©2007 Charles Peter Egeland ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As with any work of such magnitude, this dissertation simply would not have been possible without the support and assistance of many individuals and institutions. I wish to first thank Nick Toth, Kathy Schick, Kevin Hunt and Claudia Johnson. They not only generously sacrificed their time and energy as members of my committee but offered unfailing support, friendship and ideas throughout all stages of this research. Nick and Kathy provided a stimulating environment at CRAFT and the Stone Age Institute for which I will always be grateful. Nick‟s impromptu experiments and “what would happen if…” questions served as a constant reminder of what makes this field so fun and interesting. Kevin always stressed that research should focus on simple, straightforward questions, not only because they are the most easily tested but because they often provide the most influential results. I have tried to take that advice to heart in this dissertation. To Claudia I am particularly indebted to the support and enthusiasm she has offered at all stages of this project, even though it has had little to do with her own research.
  • The Origin of Representational Drawing: a Comparison of Human Children and Chimpanzees

    The Origin of Representational Drawing: a Comparison of Human Children and Chimpanzees

    Child Development, xxxx 2014, Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 1–15 The Origin of Representational Drawing: A Comparison of Human Children and Chimpanzees Aya Saito Misato Hayashi Chubu Gakuin University Kyoto University Hideko Takeshita Tetsuro Matsuzawa The University of Shiga Prefecture Kyoto University To examine the evolutional origin of representational drawing, two experiments directly compared the draw- ing behavior of human children and chimpanzees. The first experiment observed free drawing after model presentation, using imitation task. From longitudinal observation of humans (N = 32, 11–31 months), the developmental process of drawing until the emergence of shape imitation was clarified. Adult chimpanzees showed the ability to trace a model, which was difficult for humans who had just started imitation. The sec- ond experiment, free drawing on incomplete facial stimuli, revealed the remarkable difference between two species. Humans (N = 57, 6–38 months) tend to complete the missing parts even with immature motor con- trol, whereas chimpanzees never completed the missing parts and instead marked the existing parts or traced the outlines. Cognitive characteristics may affect the emergence of representational drawings. The oldest representational drawings in existence are examining the drawing behavior of chimpanzees the upper Paleolithic cave drawings of Homo sapiens, (Pan troglodytes), humans’ closest living relatives. who drew animals with a variety of materials and Chimpanzees and humans share about 98.8% of the refined techniques (Beltran, 2000; Chauvet, Des- genome (Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis champs, & Hillaire, 1996). A recent study using Consortium, 2005) and share a common ancestor uranium-thorium dating methods estimated that that existed until about 6 Ma.
  • Guide to the Betty J. Meggers and Clifford Evans Papers

    Guide to the Betty J. Meggers and Clifford Evans Papers

    Guide to the Betty J. Meggers and Clifford Evans papers Tyler Stump and Adam Fielding Funding for the processing of this collection was provided by the Smithsonian Institution's Collections Care and Preservation Fund. December 2015 National Anthropological Archives Museum Support Center 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland, Maryland 20746 [email protected] http://www.anthropology.si.edu/naa/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 5 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 5 Bibliography...................................................................................................................... 6 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 6 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 8 Series 1: Personal, 1893-2012................................................................................. 8 Series 2: Writings, 1944-2011...............................................................................
  • The Janus-Faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage

    The Janus-Faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage

    The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon To cite this version: Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, Taylor & Francis, In press, 10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329. hal-03078965 HAL Id: hal-03078965 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03078965 Submitted on 21 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Duval Mélanie, Gauchon Christophe, 2021. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329 Authors: Mélanie Duval and Christophe Gauchon Mélanie Duval: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France; * Rock Art Research Institute GAES, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Christophe Gauchon: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France.
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M

    Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M

    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
  • The Role of American Archeologists in the Study of the European Upper Paleolithic Lawrence G

    The Role of American Archeologists in the Study of the European Upper Paleolithic Lawrence G

    PaleoAnthropology, October 2004 The Role of American Archeologists in the Study of the European Upper Paleolithic Lawrence G. Straus, Editor BAR International Series 1048. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2002. Pp. 83 (paperback). ISBN 1-84171-429-1 Reviewed by Marta Camps Human Origins Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution This volume stems from a colloquium organized within the XIV UISPP Congress in Liège (Belgium), in 2001. It was quite clear to those who attended that the subject was not only an interesting and important one, but far richer than the short session could accommodate. Fortunately—particularly after notable absences among the scheduled speakers—this volume was successfully compiled and stands as a good, reliable source of information for scholars working on the European Upper Paleolithic or on the historiography of this research topic. Before commenting on the individual papers, I think it is necessary to highlight the originality of its focus, which is seldom a subject of study in itself. At first, it may look like the recollection of personal anecdotes, from American researchers who work in Europe and Europeans who are working with American colleagues in joint projects, but it soon becomes obvious that it is much more than just “their personal stories.” The way in which we understand the European Paleolithic at present has been shaped in part by many of the events, differences, and combinations of the two perspectives that the contributions mentioned below portray. Straus offers an extremely detailed account of the historical development of American participation in European projects since the late 19th century. At that time, the purpose of American visits was not only the collection of material, but also to train young workers.
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes

    Tinamiformes – Falconiformes

    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
  • Abstracts of Reports and Posters

    Abstracts of Reports and Posters

    Abstracts of Reports and Posters Amira Adaileh The Magdalenian site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld The open air site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in Sachsen-Anhalt, Eastern Germany. It was discov- ered in the mid 1950´s in the immediate vicinity of the famous Magdalenian site of Saaleck. Since that time, archaeologists collected over 2000 lithic artifacts during systematical surveys. The technological and typological analyses of the lithic artifacts confirmed the assignment of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld to a late Magdalenian. Furthermore, the investigation of the surface collections brought forward information about the character of this camp site, the duration of its occupation and the pattern of raw material procure- ment. The fact that Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in a region with more than 100 Magdalenian sites fostered a comparison of the lithic inventory with other Magdalenian assemblages. Thus, allowing to spec- ify the position of the Lengefeld collection within the chorological context of the Magdalenian in Eastern Germany. Jehanne Affolter, Ludovic Mevel Raw material circulation in northern french alps and Jura during lateglacial interstadial : method, new data and paleohistoric implication Since fifteen years the study of the characterization and origin of flint resources used by Magdalenian and Azilian groups in northern French Alps and Jura have received significant research work. Diverse and well distributed spatially, some of these resources were used and disseminated throughout the late Upper Paleolithic. Which changes do we observe during the Magdalenian then for the Azilian? The results of petrographic analysis and techno-economic analysis to several archaeological sites allow us to assess dia- chronic changes in economic behavior of these people and discuss the significance of these results.
  • The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa

    The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa

    Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Introduction 20 The African archeological record of 43-28 ka as a comparison 21 A - The Aurignacian has no direct equivalent in Africa 21 B - Archaic hominins persist in Africa through much of the Late Pleistocene 24 C - High modification symbolic artifacts in Africa and Eurasia 24 Conclusions 26 Acknowledgements 26 References cited 27 To cite this article Tryon C. A. , 2015 - The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 19-33. http://www.palethnologie.org 19 P@lethnology | 2015 | 19-33 Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Abstract The Aurignacian technocomplex in Eurasia, dated to ~43-28 ka, has no direct archeological taxonomic equivalent in Africa during the same time interval, which may reflect differences in inter-group communication or differences in archeological definitions currently in use. Extinct hominin taxa are present in both Eurasia and Africa during this interval, but the African archeological record has played little role in discussions of the demographic expansion of Homo sapiens, unlike the Aurignacian. Sites in Eurasia and Africa by 42 ka show the earliest examples of personal ornaments that result from extensive modification of raw materials, a greater investment of time that may reflect increased their use in increasingly diverse and complex social networks.
  • Aliel: a Mid-Holocene Stone Platform with Cairn and Single Pillar in West Turkana, Kenya

    Aliel: a Mid-Holocene Stone Platform with Cairn and Single Pillar in West Turkana, Kenya

    NYAME AKUMA No 86. December 2016 KENYA Aliel: A mid-Holocene stone platform with cairn and single pillar in West Turkana, Kenya Alex Wilshaw Herman Muwonge Frances Rivera Marta Mirazón Lahr Introduction In August 2016, the In-Africa Project, which fo- cuses on the palaeo-environment and human occupation of West Turkana during the late Quaternary (http://in-af- rica.org/), identified a stone platform and cairn whilst sur- veying an area between the Napudet Mountains and the Kerio River in Southwest Turkana. Different from other simple cairns in the area, this structure, locally known as Aliel, also exhibits: a) a single standing stone within the construction of the cairn; and b) a significant assemblage of pottery sherds (including Nderit ware) on the surface of the platform. Cairns, circles, platforms and stone struc- tures are well-known features of the prehistory of the Tur- kana Basin (Robbins, 2006, Wright et al., 2016), includ- ing complex megalithic architecture in the form of ‘Pillar sites’ characterised by the presence of multiple stone pil- lars placed vertically on the ground within a constructed platform, such as Lothagam, Jarigole and Kalokol (Hil- Figure 1: Map showing the location of Aliel in context debrand et al. 2011, Grillo & Hildebrand 2013, Nelson, with pillar/platform sites and pastoral sites in the area. 1995; Figure 1). While stone cairns and structures con- After Hildebrand et al. (2011) and Hildebrand and Grillo tinued to be built until recently throughout eastern Af- (2012). rica (Davies 2013), ‘Pillar sites’, often associated with settlement dynamics. The site of Aliel is well placed both ceramics decorated with ‘Nderit’ motifs, cluster chrono- chronologically and geographically to provide further in- logically between ~5,300 – 4,000 years BP (Grillo & Hil- sights into this period of prehistory.