DOCSLIB.ORG

Art in the Stone Age Terminology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Art in the Stone Age Terminology Art in the Stone Age Terminology ● Paleolithic- (Greek) ○ Paleo-Old ○ Lithos-Stone. ○ 40,000-9,000BCE ○ Characteristics, Hunter Gatherer, Caves. Migration ● Mesolithic, ○ Meso-Middle ○ Lithos- Stone Age ○ 10,000-5,000 bce ○ Characteristics, Beginnings of Cities, Dog Domestication, Transition to agricultural and animal domestication ● Neolithic, ○ Neo-New ○ Lithos-Stone ○ 8,000-2300 BCE ○ Development of Cities, Animal Husbandry Herding, Agriculture, People Began to stay in one place Mistakes in Art History The saying Goes.. “History is Written by the victors.” Niccolo Machiavelli Mercator Map Projection. https://youtu.be/KUF_Ckv8HbE http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2016/01/21/463835225/discovery-of- ancient-massacre-suggests-war-predated- settlements Radio Carbon Dating https://youtu.be/54e5Bz7m3do A process Archaeologists use among others to estimate how long ago an artifact was made. Makapansgat Face Pebble resembling a face, Makapansgat, ca. 3,000,000 bce. This pebble of one of the earliest examples of representation of the human form. Apollo 11 Cave Animal facing left, from the Apollo 11 Cave, Namibia, ca. 23,000bce. Charcoal on stone, 5”x4.25”. State Museum of Namibia, Windhoek. Scientists between 1969-1972 scientists working in the Apollo 11 Cave in Namibia found seven fragments of painted stone plaques, transportable. The approximate date of the charcoal from the archeological layer containing the Namibian plaques is 23,000bce. Hohlenstein-Stadel Human with feline (Lion?) head, from Hohlenstein-Stadel Germany, ca 40,000- 35,000BCE Appox 12” in length this artifact was carved from ivory from a mammoth tusk This object was originally thought to be of 30,000bce, was pushed back in time due to additional artifacts found later on the same excavation layer. https://youtu.be/PcT1vGyJzyg Artwork found in Caves One possible explanation of the existence of cave artifacts could be weather related. Maps depicted are historical locations of glaciers over the last 100,000 years. In the northern hemisphere, Ice sheets were much farther south, Notice the european continent where the british isles and mainland europe were connected. It was also much colder than present times. Willendorf Nude Woman (Venus of Willendorf), from Willendorf, Austria, ca. 28,000- 25,000 bce. Found on the Willendorf Archaeological site, Willendorf, Austria. Can anyone spot a problem in the name of this artifact? Can anyone use any Art History terminology to describe the artwork: Brassempouy Head of a Woman, Brassenpouy, ca 25,000-20,000 BCE. shows a differing approach to the female form, more slender, less exaggerated. Can anyone spot similarities between this image and the Willendorf figure? How about differences? Laussel Woman Holding a Bison Horn, Laussel, France. ca 25,000-20,000 BCE Painted Limestone, Red Ochre residue. 18” height https://youtu.be/AqMWh-liGuk Ochre significance Laussel woman is one the earliest relief sculpture known. It was carved with a stone chisel. Was originally on a large rock, but the fragment was removed and placed in a museum https://youtu.be/H3ja0I4DdGs https://youtu.be/eVoYWXQLoWw Hohle Fels Venus of Hohle Fels, Carved from Mammoth Tusk, found 2008, Germany, 35,000-40,000bce Le Tuc D’Audoubert Two bison, reliefs in the cave at Le Tuc d’Audoubert, France ca 15,000-10,000bce These are not rock, rather molded, built up clay using tools to model the forms, along with the artist's hands and fingernails, the artist’s fingerprints are visible in the clay. Also the cracks were formed in the days after, from drying and not the 10,000-15,000 years after. https://cfileonline.org/history-file-the- 15000-year-old-bison-of-tuc-daudoubert- contemporary-ceramic-art/ La Madeleine Bison licking its flank, fragmentary spear-thrower, from La Madeleine, France ca 12,000 bce Early example of an ornamental tool/weapon. A spear thrower carved from a reindeer antler. incredibly detailed, more than bison at le tuc. Note perspective, Can anyone describe this form and how the bison is depicted? Altamira Cave Video on Altamira Cave Site https://youtu.be/qyIfPbn0RDs Video on 10 cave painting sites https://youtu.be/V6I1ZyJjqrs http://www.spainisculture. com/en/propuestas_culturales/recorrido_ virtual_covaciella.html Despite the volume of cave painting depicted, Art Historians regard these sites incredibly rare, they exist in sites around the world over a span of 10,000- Andrew Graham-Dixon inspects cave art at Altamira 20,000 years. Lascaux Cave https://youtu.be/UnSq0c7jM-A Rick Steves at Lascaux cave replica. The Lascaux bulls show a convention of representing horns in “twisted perspective.” or a composite view, because viewers see the heads in the profile but the horns from the front. Lascaux Cave Map showing location of Lascaux, France. Lascaux Cave Lascaux cave map Lascaux Cave Lascaux Entrance Lascaux Cave Lascaux Cave Detail Lascaux Cave Lascaux Cave Detail Cueva de las manos Cueva de las manos, Santa Cruz, Patagonia, Argentina. Videos explain the site and the hand painting technique, Paleolithic aerosol cans. https://youtu.be/11Sn_CpxZPs https://youtu.be/4I49uteH-EA Lascaux Cave Notice the “composite view” of the bison. We talked about the near exclusivity of female subject matter. Can anyone spot the differences of this depicted male figure to that of the female examples. Lascaux Cave Neolithic Jericho Neolithic Jericho site, Israel/Palestine West Bank. Has been occupied by Israel since 1967. The paleolithic gave way to the mesolithic and neolithic era. 9000 BCE Food gathering and hunting were hallmarks of the paleolithic period intensifying food gathering and dog domestication were hallmarks of the mesolithic period Neolithic cultures developed livestock and agricultural cultivation, developed cities of 50,000 people. These sites first started in Anatolia and Mesopotamia Neolithic Jericho https://youtu.be/tGHR-kwjEsQ 3d model of what Neolithic Jericho looked like. the site was a walled city of appox 10 acres. 1 acre is about the size of a soccer pitch Neolithic Jericho Neolithic Jericho site, Israel/Palestine West Bank. Has been occupied by Israel since 1967. The paleolithic gave way to the mesolithic and neolithic era. 9000 BCE Food gathering and hunting were hallmarks of the paleolithic period intensifying food gathering and dog domestication were hallmarks of the mesolithic period Neolithic cultures developed livestock and agricultural cultivation, developed cities of 50,000 people. These sites first started in Anatolia and Mesopotamia Jericho Skulls Human figures, from Ain Ghazal, Jordan, ca 6750-6250 bce. Plaster, painted and inlaid with bitumen. or shells. https://youtu.be/AxBdAJM2lEM Bitumen- is a sticky, black and highly viscous liquid or semi-solid form of petroleum. Asphalt AIN GHAZAL Human figures, from Ain Ghazal, Jordan, ca 6750-6250 bce. Plaster, painted and inlaid with bitumen. NewGrange, Ireland Megalithic monument. “Great stones” Outside view of megalithic tomb NewGrange, Ireland, 3200 bce. https://youtu.be/dYR9f-PcBvo NewGrange Ireland Corbeled dome of the main chamber in the passage grave NewGrange, Ireland, 3200 bce. Corbeled Vaulting Corbeled Arch, Vaults, and domes. Notice the stacking of stones in this diagram. the span at the top is corbeled, or offsetting each successive layer of stone, closing the gap at the top. Corbeled Arch/Vault Version in india, notice the rounded arch at the top. Notice the lack of masonry holding stones together. Stones are loose, and this is a more stable construction method than the use of mortar. The spanish in its conquest of the new world would build churches on the ruins of ancient structures. Earthquakes would knock down the masonry structures, while the ancient structures would be in tact. Stonehenge Post and Lintel Construction. Oldest method of spanning a passage way. Sometimes pins held Lintel/Posts together, sometimes not. https://youtu.be/slTrDp08pLc Long video outlining megalithic structures https://youtu.be/DewEKz9TzmM StoneHenge StoneHenge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Palaeontology of Haas Gat a Preliminary Account
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wits Institutional Repository on DSPACE Palaeont. afr., 28, 29-33 (1991) THE PALAEONTOLOGY OF HAAS GAT A PRELIMINARY ACCOUNT by A.W. Keyser Geological Survey, Private Bag X112, Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa ABSTRACT Haasgat is a cave on the steep western slope of the upper reach of the Witwatersrand Spruit, on the farm Leeuwenkloof 480 lQ, in the Brits District. It was heavily mined for flowstone (calcite). The cave contains a deposit offossiliferous cave silt and breccia that was partially removed by the miners and dumped on the steep slopes of the valley. The original entrance was probably a shallow inclined pit, leading into an upper chamber and then into the preserved depository. Both porcupines and carnivores served as accumulating agents for the bones. Fossils of the primates Parapapio and Cercopifhecoides, hyaena (Chasmaporthetes), fox, porcupines, several species of bovids and two species of Hyrax have been recovered. An insufficient number of fossils have been prepared to determine the age of the deposit with certainty. The deposit was provisionally thought to be of Pliocene age because of the occurrence of Parapapio. At this stage it would be unwise to correlate this occurrence with any other caves in this age range. It is concluded that the cave silts were deposited by flash floods, under a wetter climatic regime than that of the present. MAIN FEATURES AND ORIGIN OF THE DEPOSIT Haasgat is the remains of what once was a more extensive cave on the farm Leeuwenkloof 48 JQ in the Brits District.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partial Skeleton Stw 431 from Sterkfontein – Is It Time to Rethink the Plio-Pleistocene Hominin Diversity in South Africa?
    doie-pub 10.4436/JASS.98020 ahead of print JASs Reports doi: 10.4436/jass.89003 Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 98 (2020), pp. 73-88 The partial skeleton StW 431 from Sterkfontein – Is it time to rethink the Plio-Pleistocene hominin diversity in South Africa? Gabriele A. Macho1, Cinzia Fornai 2, Christine Tardieu3, Philip Hopley4, Martin Haeusler5 & Michel Toussaint6 1) Earth and Planetary Science, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, England; School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, England email: [email protected]; [email protected] 2) Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria 3) Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France 4) Earth and Planetary Science, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX; Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, England 5) Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland 6) retired palaeoanthropologist, Belgium email: [email protected] Summary - The discovery of the nearly complete Plio-Pleistocene skeleton StW 573 Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein Member 2, South Africa, has intensified debates as to whether Sterkfontein Member 4 contains a hominin species other than Australopithecus africanus. For example, it has recently been suggested that the partial skeleton StW 431 should be removed from the A. africanus hypodigm and be placed into A. prometheus. Here we re-evaluate this latter proposition, using published information and new comparative data. Although both StW 573 and StW 431 are apparently comparable in their arboreal (i.e., climbing) and bipedal adaptations, they also show significant morphological differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Origen En La Fenomenología Del Habitar a Partir De La Representación Simbólica Del Espacio
    58 Un origen en la fenomenología del habitar a partir de la representación simbólica del espacio doi: 10.33264/rpa.201802-06 Rodrigo Gandolfi Orrego Escuela de Arquitectura Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Artes Visuales Resumen El texto a continuación, busca profundizar sobre aquellos elementos originales que habrían motivado al individuo, a la adaptación de su entorno como estrategia de representación simbólica, la que alcanzará con el desarrollo de una concepción fenomenológica del espacio y el tiempo, y cuyo origen aparecerá junto a su anhelo de protección y su voluntad para organizar sus hábitos, modos de convivencia y comunicación. A partir de su experiencia del mundo, será capaz de trasladar aquellas vivencias al interior de su morada, concibiendo por vez primera, aquella unión entre exterior e interior como posibilidad de representación de su mundo interior reconociendo los fenómenos que lo rodean. De este modo, aparecerá la posibilidad de reparar aquella brecha existencial impuesta por la distancia espacial y temporal que lo separa de la realidad, o aquello que le resulta inalcanzable y doloroso. La caverna, específicamente sus paredes, constituyen los límites de aquella primera morada donde se configura la escena a través de la cual será capaz de representar su propio mundo interior-exterior como unidad indivisible y posibilidad de trascendencia simbólica que le permitirá concebir su presencia armónica en el cosmos. Palabras clave: arte rupestre, arquitectura, simbolismo, fenomenología, habitar, representación simbólica, Platón, Sigfried Giedion, mito de la caverna. Abstract The following text, seeks to deepen on those original elements that could have motivated the individual, to adapt their environment as a strategy of symbolic representation, which will be achieved with the development of a phenomenological conception of space and time, and whose origin appears together with its desire for protection and willingness to organize their habits, their ways of living together and communication, from their own worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Reports and Posters
    Abstracts of Reports and Posters Amira Adaileh The Magdalenian site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld The open air site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in Sachsen-Anhalt, Eastern Germany. It was discov- ered in the mid 1950´s in the immediate vicinity of the famous Magdalenian site of Saaleck. Since that time, archaeologists collected over 2000 lithic artifacts during systematical surveys. The technological and typological analyses of the lithic artifacts confirmed the assignment of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld to a late Magdalenian. Furthermore, the investigation of the surface collections brought forward information about the character of this camp site, the duration of its occupation and the pattern of raw material procure- ment. The fact that Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in a region with more than 100 Magdalenian sites fostered a comparison of the lithic inventory with other Magdalenian assemblages. Thus, allowing to spec- ify the position of the Lengefeld collection within the chorological context of the Magdalenian in Eastern Germany. Jehanne Affolter, Ludovic Mevel Raw material circulation in northern french alps and Jura during lateglacial interstadial : method, new data and paleohistoric implication Since fifteen years the study of the characterization and origin of flint resources used by Magdalenian and Azilian groups in northern French Alps and Jura have received significant research work. Diverse and well distributed spatially, some of these resources were used and disseminated throughout the late Upper Paleolithic. Which changes do we observe during the Magdalenian then for the Azilian? The results of petrographic analysis and techno-economic analysis to several archaeological sites allow us to assess dia- chronic changes in economic behavior of these people and discuss the significance of these results.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Large-Scale Mitogenomic Analysis
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2019 Large-scale mitogenomic analysis of the phylogeography of the Late Pleistocene cave bear Gretzinger, Joscha ; Molak, Martyna ; Reiter, Ella ; Pfrengle, Saskia ; Urban, Christian ; Neukamm, Judith ; Blant, Michel ; Conard, Nicholas J ; Cupillard, Christophe ; Dimitrijević, Vesna ; Drucker, Dorothée G ; Hofman-Kamińska, Emilia ; Kowalczyk, Rafał ; Krajcarz, Maciej T ; Krajcarz, Magdalena ; Münzel, Susanne C ; Peresani, Marco ; Romandini, Matteo ; Rufí, Isaac ; Soler, Joaquim ; Terlato, Gabriele ; Krause, Johannes ; Bocherens, Hervé ; Schuenemann, Verena J Abstract: The cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) is one of the Late Pleistocene megafauna species that faced extinction at the end of the last ice age. Although it is represented by one of the largest fossil records in Europe and has been subject to several interdisciplinary studies including palaeogenetic research, its fate remains highly controversial. Here, we used a combination of hybridisation capture and next generation sequencing to reconstruct 59 new complete cave bear mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) from 14 sites in Western, Central and Eastern Europe. In a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, we compared them to 64 published cave bear mtDNA sequences to reconstruct the population dynamics and phylogeography dur- ing the Late Pleistocene. We found five major mitochondrial DNA lineages resulting in a noticeably more complex biogeography of the European lineages during the last 50,000 years than previously assumed. Furthermore, our calculated effective female population sizes suggest a drastic cave bear population de- cline starting around 40,000 years ago at the onset of the Aurignacian, coinciding with the spread of anatomically modern humans in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Origins and the Stone Age Evolution of Flutes
    Musical Origins and the Stone Age Evolution of Flutes When we, modern humans, emerged from Africa and colonized Europe Jelle Atema 45,000 years ago, did we have flutes in fist and melodies in mind? Email: [email protected] Introduction Music is an intensely emotional subject and the origins of music have fascinated Postal: people for millennia, going back to early historic records. An excellent review can Boston University be found in “Dolmetsch Online” (http://www.dolmetsch.com/musictheory35. Biology Department htm). Intense debates in the late 19th and early 20th century revolved around the 5 Cummington Street origins of speech and music and which came first. Biologist Charles Darwin, befit- Boston, MA 02215 ting his important recognition of evolution by sexual selection, considered that music evolved as a courtship display similar to bird song; he also felt that speech derived from music. Musicologist Spencer posited that music derived from the emotional content of human speech. The Darwin–Spencer debate (Kivy, 1959) continues unresolved. During the same period the eminent physicist Helmholtz- following Aristotle-studied harmonics of sound and felt that music distinguished itself from speech by its “fixed degree in the scale” (Scala = stairs, i.e. discrete steps) as opposed to the sliding pitches (“glissando”) typical of human speech. As we will see, this may not be such a good distinction when analyzing very early musi- cal instruments with our contemporary bias toward scales. More recent symposia include “The origins of music” (Wallin et al., 2000) and “The music of nature and the nature of music” (Gray et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • 2. La Evolución Del Arte Parietal En Las Cuevas Y Abrigos Ornamentados De
    La evolución del arte parietal en las cuevas y abrigos ornamentados de Francia 1 Por el Abate H. Breuil N 1905 traté, por primera vez, de hilvanar en conjunto y pers­ E pectiva las primeras indicaciones de cronología relativas a la evolución del arte rupestre paleolítico, con los datos conocidos entonces de la Mouthe, Combarelles, Font-de-Gaume, Pair-non-Pair y Marsoulas, en Francia, y solamente de la cueva de Altamira, en España. Desarrollé el mismo tema en Mónaco el año siguiente. No me forjé ilusiones sobre el carácter tan provisional de este ensayo que fui retocando sucesivamente en las diversas publicaciones que, gracias al príncipe Alberto de Mónaco, pude editar con lujo sobre las cuevas de Altamira (1908), Santander, Font-de-Gaume (1910). las de los Pirineos cantábricos (1912), de la Pasiega (1913), de la Pileta, Málaga (1915) y de Combarelles (1924). El estudio todavía inédito, en parte, de muchas otras del sudoeste y sur de Francia y del noroeste de España, me han llevado a una concepción mucho más compleja de la evolución de este arte sobre el que hoy escribo (en 1934): examinaremos, pues, sucesivamente, solamente para Francia, los diversos grupos de cuevas y abrigos decorados: 1) Piri­ neos: 2) norte del Garona; 3) Provenza occidental. En cada grupo estudiaremos primero los hechos relativos a la evolución de la pintura; los casos de superposiciones directas de técnicas diferentes nos permitirán clasificar los documentos de una misma época por comparación de estilos. Después, en cada región, examinaremos también el desarrollo paralelo de la evolución del grabado y de la escultura parietal.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual De Arte Rupestre De Cundinamarca
    ¿Que es arte rupestre?/1 SEGUNDA EDICIÓN Diego Martínez Celis Álvaro Botiva Contreras INSTITUTO COLOMBIANO DE ANTROPOLOGÍA E HISTORIA ICANH Grupo de Arqueología y Patrimonio SECRETARÍA DE CULTURA DE CUNDINAMARCA 2/ARTE RUPESTRE EN CUNDINAMARCA Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia ICANH Directora: María Victoria Uribe Alarcón Planeación: Emiro José Díaz Leal Coordinador Grupo de Arqueología y Patrimonio: Víctor González Fernández Coodinador de publicaciones: Nicolás Morales Thomas Director del proyecto: Álvaro Botiva Contreras Departamento de Cundinamarca Gobernador: Pablo Ardila Sierra Secretario de Cultura: Jorge Santiago Pyñeiro Medina Asosores culturales: Mirella Sepúlveda Hernández / Francisco Gaitán manualdearterupestredecundinamarca Segunda edición Investigación y textos: Diego Martínez Celis / Álvaro Botiva Contreras Fotografías: Álvaro Botiva Contreras / Diego Martínez Celis Edición, diseño e ilustraciones: Diego Martínez Celis Colaboradores: Pedro Argüello, Andrea Martínez, Martha Cecilia Maldonado Bogotá D. C. Colombia, julio de 2004 Copyright: ©Diego Martínez Celis ©Álvaro Botiva Contreras ©Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia (ICANH) ©Departamento de Cundinamarca ISBN: 958-8181-07-0 ¿Que es arte rupestre?/3 contenido 4 / Presentación a la segunda edición 6 / Introducción 8 / Patrimonio arqueológico 10 / ¿Qué es arte rupestre? Descubrimiento del arte rupestre en Europa Descubrimiento del arte rupestre en Colombia 14 / ¿Qué es un petroglifo? 16 / ¿Qué es una pictografía? 18 / ¿En dónde se encuentra el arte
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Aestheticus’
    Conceptual Paper Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 11 Issue 3 - June 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Shuchi Srivastava DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2020.11.555815 Man and Artistic Expression: Emergence of ‘Homo Aestheticus’ Shuchi Srivastava* Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, University of Lucknow, India Submission: May 30, 2020; Published: June 16, 2020 *Corresponding author: Shuchi Srivastava, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, An Autonomous College of University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India Abstract Man is a member of animal kingdom like all other animals but his unique feature is culture. Cultural activities involve art and artistic expressions which are the earliest methods of emotional manifestation through sign. The present paper deals with the origin of the artistic expression of the man, i.e. the emergence of ‘Homo aestheticus’ and discussed various related aspects. It is basically a conceptual paper; history of art begins with humanity. In his artistic instincts and attainments, man expressed his vigour, his ability to establish a gainful and optimistictherefore, mainlyrelationship the secondary with his environmentsources of data to humanizehave been nature. used for Their the behaviorsstudy. Overall as artists findings was reveal one of that the man selection is artistic characteristics by nature suitableand the for the progress of the human species. Evidence from extensive analysis of cave art and home art suggests that humans have also been ‘Homo aestheticus’ since their origins. Keywords: Man; Art; Artistic expression; Homo aestheticus; Prehistoric art; Palaeolithic art; Cave art; Home art Introduction ‘Sahityasangeetkalavihinah, Sakshatpashuh Maybe it was the time when some African apelike creatures to 7 million years ago, the first human ancestors were appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Ap Art History Image Set Snapshot #1 Image
    AP ART HISTORY 2015-2016 1 AP ART HISTORY IMAGE SET SNAPSHOT #1 IMAGE SET identification: Apollo 11 stones. Namibia. c. 25,500-25,300 B.C. E. Charcoal on stone. Snapshot: This pre-historic charcoal drawing of an unknown animal is one of the oldest known artworks that originated from the African continent. At the time of its creation it would have been considered nothing more than a drawing, but today this collection of drawings is some of the first evidence we have of early human communication. These stones originate from the Apollo 11 caves in Namibia and were likely meant to illustrate the game that could be found in the region at that time. It is unclear if there is a story being told by the drawings but it is probable that they all display a continuity that could be understood by the people in the region during the time frame of their creation and could be used to communicate some idea. Through very precise carbon dating, these drawings are able to give scientists a timeframe of when changes in human behavior occurred and when social and biological evolution was happening among the human race, as well as show us where humanity’s first hunter and gatherer societies began. This ancient art was what the humans of its day used to communicate with each other and would seem very insignificant at the time, but in today's society this piece lets us study more about humanity’s humble beginnings. AP ART HISTORY 2015-2016 2 AP ART HISTORY IMAGE SET SNAPSHOT #1 Possible Themes: Reverence of Nature, Hunting Possible Subthemes: Animal qualities, Communication Possible Connections with other works in the IMAGE SET: Running Horned Woman.
    [Show full text]
  • A Female Figurine from the Basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in Southwestern Germany
    Vol 459 | 14 May 2009 | doi:10.1038/nature07995 LETTERS A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany Nicholas J. Conard1 Despite well over 100 years of research and debate, the origins of art dimensions. Four fragments were recovered in connection with water remain contentious1–3. In recent years, abstract depictions have screening and can be localized to a 10-l volume corresponding to a ,3- been documented at southern African sites dating to 75 kyr before cm-thick portion of a quarter metre.The pieces of the figurine lay about present (BP)4,5, and the earliest figurative art, which is often seen as 3 m below the current surface of the cave in an area about 20 m from the an important proxy for advanced symbolic communication, has cave’s entrance. All of the finds come from the southwest quadrant of a been documented in Europe as dating to between 30 and single square metre and were recovered from within 12 cm in the 40 kyr BP2. Here I report the discovery of a female mammoth-ivory vertical dimension (Fig. 2). Although, owing to their fragility and com- figurine in the basal Aurignacian deposit at Hohle Fels Cave in the plex depositional histories, many of the ivory artworks from the Swabian Jura of southwestern Germany during excavations in Swabian Jura are highly fragmentary, the Venus from Hohle Fels is 2008. This figurine was produced at least 35,000 calendar years nearly complete; only the left arm and shoulder are missing. The excel- ago, making it one of the oldest known examples of figurative art.
    [Show full text]
  • Speleology and Magnetobiostratigraphic Chronology of the Buffalo Cave Fossil Site, Makapansgat, South Africa ⁎ Andy I.R
    Quaternary Research 66 (2006) 233–245 www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Speleology and magnetobiostratigraphic chronology of the Buffalo Cave fossil site, Makapansgat, South Africa ⁎ Andy I.R. Herries a,b, , Kaye E. Reed c, Kevin L. Kuykendall d, Alf G. Latham e a Geomagnetism Laboratory, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZE, UK b Palaeoanthropology Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney 2052, Australia c Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA d Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK e Department of Archaeology, Hartley Building, University of Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK Received 30 September 2004 Available online 12 June 2006 Abstract Speleological, stratigraphic, paleomagnetic and faunal data is presented for the Buffalo Cave fossil site in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Speleothems and clastic deposits were sampled for paleomagnetic and mineral magnetic analysis from the northern part of the site, where stratigraphic relationships could be more easily defined and a magnetostratigraphy could therefore be developed for the site. This is also where excavations recovered the fossil material described. A comparison of the east and South African first and last appearance data with the Buffalo Cave fauna was then used to constrain the magnetostratigraphy to produce a more secure age for the site. The magnetostratigraphy showed a change from normal to reversed polarity in the basal speleothems followed by a short normal polarity period in the base of the clastic deposits and a slow change to reversed directions for the remainder of the sequence. The biochronology suggested an optimal age range of between 1.0 Ma and 600,000 yr based on faunal correlation with eastern and southern Africa.
    [Show full text]