Abstracts of Reports and Posters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abstracts of Reports and Posters Abstracts of Reports and Posters Amira Adaileh The Magdalenian site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld The open air site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in Sachsen-Anhalt, Eastern Germany. It was discov- ered in the mid 1950´s in the immediate vicinity of the famous Magdalenian site of Saaleck. Since that time, archaeologists collected over 2000 lithic artifacts during systematical surveys. The technological and typological analyses of the lithic artifacts confirmed the assignment of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld to a late Magdalenian. Furthermore, the investigation of the surface collections brought forward information about the character of this camp site, the duration of its occupation and the pattern of raw material procure- ment. The fact that Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in a region with more than 100 Magdalenian sites fostered a comparison of the lithic inventory with other Magdalenian assemblages. Thus, allowing to spec- ify the position of the Lengefeld collection within the chorological context of the Magdalenian in Eastern Germany. Jehanne Affolter, Ludovic Mevel Raw material circulation in northern french alps and Jura during lateglacial interstadial : method, new data and paleohistoric implication Since fifteen years the study of the characterization and origin of flint resources used by Magdalenian and Azilian groups in northern French Alps and Jura have received significant research work. Diverse and well distributed spatially, some of these resources were used and disseminated throughout the late Upper Paleolithic. Which changes do we observe during the Magdalenian then for the Azilian? The results of petrographic analysis and techno-economic analysis to several archaeological sites allow us to assess dia- chronic changes in economic behavior of these people and discuss the significance of these results. Are they contextual or cultural? This can be tested by the parallel of cultural influences and circulation of the materials (lithic and ornaments). Walpurga Antl Excavations at the multilayered Gravettian site Grub/Kranawetberg, Lower Austria 1993-2011 – stratigraphy and outlook to the position of the site within the cultural development in Eastern Central Europe From 1993 to 2011 excavations at the Gravettian 25 ka BP site Grub/Kranawetberg in the March valley near Stillfried in the northeast of Lower Austria exposed two different areas of activity: a bone accumula- tion in the west and approximately 20 m from this situation to the east a multilayered area with dwelling structures. The focus of this contribution will be put on this part of the excavated area. The lowest archaeological layer (AH4) contains two hearths which are approximately 12m apart from each other. Both are surrounded by a series of small pits. Between these two concentrations of pits – in a dis- tance of 7.5 to 8m – there were no pits at all. The density of finds in the zone between the concentrations of pits however is very big. In some parts of the excavated area a sudden decrease of finds can be ob- served: 0.5 to 1m outside the pits around hearth I to the north, west and south and 0.5 to 1m outside the pits around hearth II to the north. This is comparable with the observations of Ph. Nigst (Nigst 2004) in his analysis of the structures around hearth I. Following his study the distribution of artefacts suggests a barrier effect slightly outside the evi- dent structures of hearth I. According to these observations the existence of a second settlement unit around hearth II will be discussed. The following layer (AH3) is separated from AH4 by about 8 to 10 cm of loess. The centre of this occu- pation is situated almost above hearth II, only 2m to the NW of it. In AH3 there are no structures compa- rable to those of AH4. The horizon itself is documented with at least some finds in all parts excavated so far. Above AH3 there are two more archaeological layers (AH2 and AH1) with only some scattered finds. Therefore a first view will concentrate on a comparison of AH4 and AH3. 13 Chronologically both layers are very close together (Antl-Weiser, Fladerer, Nigst, Verpoorte 2010) but there are big differences concerning structure and content. Most of the lithics of AH4 can be compared to Southern Moravian chert or northern flint. Special raw materials are a piece of obsidian presumably from Eastern Slovakia and some pieces of crystal rock. The tools are dominated by microgravettes. There are also three shouldered points in this horizon. Ivory beads and pendants (at least 245 pieces) are exclusively found within AH4. But there are also perforated mollusc shells and Dentalium. AH3 contains no clear evident structures. The raw material mainly consists of brown to green radiolarites, which can be found in the Carpathian Mountains. Among the backed pieces backed bladelets are dominat- ing. There are also differences in the style of retouches. The ornaments only consist of various molluscs. So we can see big differences in the choice of raw material as well as in personal ornaments. The radiocarbon dates from Grub/Kranawetberg are situated at the very end of the Pavlovian and the beginning of Willendorf-Kostenkian of the Gravettian evolution in Central Europe after M. Otte (Otte, Noiret 2002). A shift of population to a certain extent from the former Pavlovian sites to the East is being discussed. At Grub/Kranawetberg we observe a change in settlement structures, lithic raw materials, per- sonal adornments and a different choice of tool types around 25,000 BP. Further charcoal samples have been taken from AH2 and AH1 as well as from the loess below and above the cultural layers. According to the present state of research the inventory of the two layers seems to reflect the presence of groups using different territories. Based on these observations further analyses concerning raw material procurement, the choice of big game and investigations concerning climatic changes will be part of a fu- ture project. Due to a sequence of four cultural layers and 7 m of sedimentological sequence the site promises interesting insights into cultural processes around 25.000 BP in the Eastern part of Central Eu- rope as well as into climatic changes during a longer time span of the late glacial period in this part of Austria. References: Antl-Weiser, W.; Fladerer, F. A.; Nigst, Ph. R.; Verpoorte A. (2010): Grub/Kranawetberg (Lower Aus- tria) – Insights into a Gravettian micro-region in Eastern Austria. In: Neugebauer-Maresch Ch.; Linda Owen (eds.): New aspects of the Central and Eastern European Upper palaeolithic – meth- ods, chronology, technology and subsistence. MPK 72, 2010. Nigst, Ph. R. (2004): Some preliminary observations on intrasite spatial patterning of Grub/Kranawetberg (1995 and 1996 area), In: The Gravettian along the Danube. Proceedings of the Mikulov Confer- ence, 20.-21. November 2002, Institute of Archeology, AS CR, Brno, The Dolni Vestonice Stud- ies, Vol. 11,131-141. Otte, M. ; Noiret, P. (2004): Evolution du Gravettien au moyen Danube. In : J. A. Svoboda, L. Sedlackova (Eds.) : The Gravettian along the Danube. Proceedings of the Mikulov conference, 20-21 No- vember 2002, P. 8-33. Dolni Vestonice Studies 11, Brno. Daniele Aureli1,5, Antonia Contardi2, Biagio Giaccio3, Federica Marano4, Valerio Modesti2, Maria Rita Palombo4, Roxane Rocca5, Flavia Trucco6, Boris Villier7 Entwined evolution? New evidence of the coexistence of Humans and Elephants during the Middle Pleistocene at the Ficoncella site (Central Italy) The two preliminary excavation campaigns carried out on the Ficoncella site have yielded unexpected discoveries which allow us to open of new lines of research as to the technical and cognitive behaviour of Lower Palaeolithic Humans. The discovery, during the first excavation campaign in 2010, of anatomical fragments coming from a car- cass of a Palaeoloxodon within a fluvial context sealed by volcanic strata, dated around 450 Ka, already makes the site of primary interest from a palaeontological point of view. With the second excavation, carried out in 2011, around one hundred lithic artefacts of tiny dimension, localised near the cranium of the Palaeoloxodon were brought to light. This new archaeological evidence opens up new research pro- spects both for the understanding of the technical behaviours of this pivotal moment of the European Lower Palaeolithic (around 500 Ka) as well as cognitive and economic issues surrounding the relationship between man and elephants during the Palaeolithic. 14 1. Università degli Studi di Siena Dip. di Scienze Ambientali "G. Sarfatti" U.R. Ecologia Preistorica Via T. Pen- dola 62 - 53100 Siena, Italy 2. Museo Civico A. Klitsche De La Grange, Palazzo Camerale, Piazza della Repubblica, 29, 00051 Allumiere, Rome, Italy 3. Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, CNR, Via Salaria Km 29,300, 00016 Monterotondo Stazione, Rome, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, CNR, Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, Piazzale A. Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy. 5. Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense UMR 7041 - ArScAn - équipe AnTET (Anthropologie des techni- ques des espaceset des territoires aux Pliocène et Pléistocène). 6. La Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici dell’Etruria Meridionale, Piazzale di Villa Giulia, 9, 00196 Rome, It- aly. 7. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, University of Torino, Via Valperga Caluso, 35, I-10125 Torino, Italy. Michel Barbaza Microlaminar cultures and environment at feet of Pyrenees at the end of glacial period The northern pyrenean piedmont, location of many first-time studies on the very end of the last great glacial period, suffers from an evident lack of recent and well informed studies. A few recently published sites, or soon to be published sites, allow nevertheless to present the first elements of analysis and reflec- tion that take the Younger Dryas and the classical Pyrenean Azilian societies into a global consideration. After careful examination, both processes show that their relationships are more complex than those due to simple ecological determinism.
Recommended publications
  • Art in the Stone Age Terminology
    Art in the Stone Age Terminology ● Paleolithic- (Greek) ○ Paleo-Old ○ Lithos-Stone. ○ 40,000-9,000BCE ○ Characteristics, Hunter Gatherer, Caves. Migration ● Mesolithic, ○ Meso-Middle ○ Lithos- Stone Age ○ 10,000-5,000 bce ○ Characteristics, Beginnings of Cities, Dog Domestication, Transition to agricultural and animal domestication ● Neolithic, ○ Neo-New ○ Lithos-Stone ○ 8,000-2300 BCE ○ Development of Cities, Animal Husbandry Herding, Agriculture, People Began to stay in one place Mistakes in Art History The saying Goes.. “History is Written by the victors.” Niccolo Machiavelli Mercator Map Projection. https://youtu.be/KUF_Ckv8HbE http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2016/01/21/463835225/discovery-of- ancient-massacre-suggests-war-predated- settlements Radio Carbon Dating https://youtu.be/54e5Bz7m3do A process Archaeologists use among others to estimate how long ago an artifact was made. Makapansgat Face Pebble resembling a face, Makapansgat, ca. 3,000,000 bce. This pebble of one of the earliest examples of representation of the human form. Apollo 11 Cave Animal facing left, from the Apollo 11 Cave, Namibia, ca. 23,000bce. Charcoal on stone, 5”x4.25”. State Museum of Namibia, Windhoek. Scientists between 1969-1972 scientists working in the Apollo 11 Cave in Namibia found seven fragments of painted stone plaques, transportable. The approximate date of the charcoal from the archeological layer containing the Namibian plaques is 23,000bce. Hohlenstein-Stadel Human with feline (Lion?) head, from Hohlenstein-Stadel Germany, ca 40,000- 35,000BCE Appox 12” in length this artifact was carved from ivory from a mammoth tusk This object was originally thought to be of 30,000bce, was pushed back in time due to additional artifacts found later on the same excavation layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeolithic Bone Retouchers from Belgium: a Preliminary­ Overview of the Recent Research Through Historic and Recently Excavated Bone Collections
    GRÉGORY ABRAMS PALAEOLITHIC BONE RETOUCHERS FROM BELGIUM: A PRE LIMINARY OVERVIEW OF THE RECENT RESEARCH THROUGH HISTORIC AND RECENTLY EXCAVATED BONE COLLECTIONS Abstract Since the first half of the 19th century, Belgium has provided a multitude of sites dating back to the Palaeo- lithic. These discoveries have contributed to the definition of the Palaeolithic and to the understanding of prehistoric people. This long tradition of research has resulted in the collection of thousands of bones that are increasingly the subject of extensive analysis, including the study of bone retouchers. At present, this re- search has identified 535 retouchers in various Belgian repositories. The tools come from different sites with highly variable and incomplete contextual information depending on their excavation history (e.g., Trou du Diable and the Caves of Goyet). In contrast, unit 5 of Scladina Cave constitutes a well-defined assemblage. Bones with fresh fracture patterns provide interesting technological data, such as a refitted cave bear femo- ral shaft that includes four retouchers. The use of cave bear bones for producing tools at Scladina Cave as well as retouchers made from Neanderthal remains from the 3rd Cave of Goyet gives rise to questions about the possible symbolic meanings attributed to particular species. Keywords Belgium; Middle Palaeolithic; Retouchers; Neanderthals; Cave bear; Refitting Introduction Belgian Palaeolithic research has its roots deep in ness of cave sites was such that most were explored the first half of the 19th century with the work of during the 19th century. Philippe-Charles Schmerling, who found the first Since the beginning of research into Belgian Neander thal remains in Engis Cave in the early prehistory, archaeologists have focused their atten- 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Janus-Faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage
    The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon To cite this version: Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, Taylor & Francis, In press, 10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329. hal-03078965 HAL Id: hal-03078965 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03078965 Submitted on 21 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Duval Mélanie, Gauchon Christophe, 2021. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329 Authors: Mélanie Duval and Christophe Gauchon Mélanie Duval: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France; * Rock Art Research Institute GAES, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Christophe Gauchon: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Sites – Developments and Delistings
    Research and Information Service Briefing Paper Paper 169/12 03 October 2012 NIAR 513-2012 Eóin Murphy World Heritage Sites – Developments and Delistings 1 Introduction The following paper discusses World Heritage Sites which have undergone development and delisting. 2 Key Points . The Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage was adopted by UNESCO in 1972 and allowed Member States to nominate sites of local or national pride to be listed as World Heritage Sites (WHS); . There are currently 962 properties worldwide that meet the necessary criteria, with a further 1,561 tentative sites nominated by UN Member Nations; . Benefits to WHS status includes access to the World Heritage Fund, stimulus to awareness raising and educational initiatives and an enhanced tourism image and profile; . However, there are also costs such as ongoing management costs of up to €173,000 (£150,000) per annum; Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly 1 NIAR 513-2012 Briefing Paper . The impact of WHS status varies from site to site, with the pre-WHS socio-economic profile of the site having a particular effect. Variables such as pre-inscription status and branding also influence post-inscription success; . A site can be listed in danger of losing its WHS with the World Heritage Committee (WHC) able to intervene to address the situation. Interventions can occur for a number of reasons, including restoring sites following natural disasters or wars; . Initially a site which is in danger of losing its WHS status is identified by UNESCO and placed on the “List of World Heritage in Danger”.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals
    Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals João Zilhãoa,1, Diego E. Angeluccib, Ernestina Badal-Garcíac, Francesco d’Erricod,e, Floréal Danielf, Laure Dayetf, Katerina Doukag, Thomas F. G. Highamg, María José Martínez-Sánchezh, Ricardo Montes-Bernárdezi, Sonia Murcia-Mascarósj, Carmen Pérez-Sirventh, Clodoaldo Roldán-Garcíaj, Marian Vanhaerenk, Valentín Villaverdec, Rachel Woodg, and Josefina Zapatal aUniversity of Bristol, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bristol BS8 1UU, United Kingdom; bUniversità degli Studi di Trento, Laboratorio di Preistoria B. Bagolini, Dipartimento di Filosofia, Storia e Beni Culturali, 38122 Trento, Italy; cUniversidad de Valencia, Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueología, 46010 Valencia, Spain; dCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199, De la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, 33405 Talence, France; eUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Institute for Human Evolution, Johannesburg, 2050 Wits, South Africa; fUniversité de Bordeaux 3, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5060, Institut de Recherche sur les Archéomatériaux, Centre de recherche en physique appliquée à l’archéologie, 33607 Pessac, France; gUniversity of Oxford, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Dyson Perrins Building, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom; hUniversidad de Murcia, Departamento de Química Agrícola, Geología y Edafología, Facultad de Química, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain; iFundación de Estudios Murcianos Marqués de Corvera, 30566 Las Torres de Cotillas (Murcia), Spain; jUniversidad de Valencia, Instituto de Ciencia de los Materiales, 46071 Valencia, Spain; kCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7041, Archéologies et Sciences de l’Antiquité, 92023 Nanterre, France; and lUniversidad de Murcia, Área de Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain Communicated by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • 'Large-Scale Mitogenomic Analysis
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2019 Large-scale mitogenomic analysis of the phylogeography of the Late Pleistocene cave bear Gretzinger, Joscha ; Molak, Martyna ; Reiter, Ella ; Pfrengle, Saskia ; Urban, Christian ; Neukamm, Judith ; Blant, Michel ; Conard, Nicholas J ; Cupillard, Christophe ; Dimitrijević, Vesna ; Drucker, Dorothée G ; Hofman-Kamińska, Emilia ; Kowalczyk, Rafał ; Krajcarz, Maciej T ; Krajcarz, Magdalena ; Münzel, Susanne C ; Peresani, Marco ; Romandini, Matteo ; Rufí, Isaac ; Soler, Joaquim ; Terlato, Gabriele ; Krause, Johannes ; Bocherens, Hervé ; Schuenemann, Verena J Abstract: The cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) is one of the Late Pleistocene megafauna species that faced extinction at the end of the last ice age. Although it is represented by one of the largest fossil records in Europe and has been subject to several interdisciplinary studies including palaeogenetic research, its fate remains highly controversial. Here, we used a combination of hybridisation capture and next generation sequencing to reconstruct 59 new complete cave bear mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) from 14 sites in Western, Central and Eastern Europe. In a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, we compared them to 64 published cave bear mtDNA sequences to reconstruct the population dynamics and phylogeography dur- ing the Late Pleistocene. We found five major mitochondrial DNA lineages resulting in a noticeably more complex biogeography of the European lineages during the last 50,000 years than previously assumed. Furthermore, our calculated effective female population sizes suggest a drastic cave bear population de- cline starting around 40,000 years ago at the onset of the Aurignacian, coinciding with the spread of anatomically modern humans in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index
    Index A Bajloni’s calotte BAJ, 17, 19–20 Accretion model of Neanderthal evolution, 29 Balanica Acculturation, 164–165, 253 BH-1, 15, 24–29, 309 Acheulean, 80, 148, 172, 177, 201, 205, 306, 308, 310 hominin, 15–17, 29 large flake, 129, 132, 218 Mala, vi, 16, 24, 30, 139–140, 144–145, lithic artifacts, 80 148, 309–311 Lower, 308 Velika, 24, 36, 139–140, 144–145, 148 Middle, 308 Balıtepe, 214, 223–224 Admixture, vi, 29, 258 Balkan, v, 3, 139, 159, 171, 187, 218, 229, 274, 282, 303 Neanderthal, 51–64 and Anatolia, 308–310 Adriatic, 46, 154, 157, 162, 164–166 Central, vi, 3, 15–30, 139–150 Aegean, 29–30, 74–76, 116, 119, 121–122, 134–135, 148, 213, implications for earliest settlement of Europe, 220–221, 261, 283, 305, 316 187–210 Aizanoi, 221 Mountains, 69, 187 Akçeşme, 214, 223–224 and neighbouring regions, 229–261 Aktaş, 214, 217 Peninsula, 51, 70, 74, 119, 134, 150, 187, 201, 208 Alluvial plain, 125, 314 Southern, 3, 12, 47, 275 Alykes, 270, 272 Bañolas mandible, 28 Amărăști, 176–177, 181 Basalt, 201, 217–218, 220, 284 Anatolia (Asia Minor), 3, 79–80, 308–310 Basins, 51, 74, 99, 119, 139, 213, 281, 303 Central (Region), 128, 132, 134, 213, 217–218, 220, 223, 313 Anagni, 306 Eastern (Region), 217 Apennine, 310, 314 and hominin dispersals, 213–225 Beni Fouda, 307 North, 120 Čačak-Kraljevo, 140 Southeastern (Region), 215, 217, 220, 223 Carpathian, 51, 148 west, 119, 121 Denizli, 83 Anatomically modern human, 23, 36, 41, 44, 46, 55–56, 62, 70, 72, evolution on archaeological distributions, 313–317 76, 95, 111, 153, 165–166, 229 Grevena, 269, 272 Apidima, 4, 7–8, 11–12, 96, 310–311 Kalloni, 121–122 Apolakkia, 270–271 Megalopolis, 9, 12, 134–135, 298 Apollonia, 74, 270, 273, 276–277, 286–287 Mygdonia, 12, 273 Arago, 10, 25, 29, 56, 59, 87–90, 149, 312 Niš, 139, 146 Archaeological pattern, 303, 305 Pannonian, 15, 23, 319 Areopolis, 97 Thessalian, 310 Asprochaliko, 95, 148, 238–239, 253, 260 Venosa, 306 Assimilation model, 162 Belen Tepe, 221–222, 225 Atapuerca, 28, 276, 285, 287, 312, 318 Benkovski, 187, 205–209, 309 Sima de los Huesos, 27–29, 304, 306–307 BH-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology Society Meeting Abstracts, Memphis, Tn, 17-18 April 2012
    PALEOANTHROPOLOGY SOCIETY MEETING ABSTRACTS, MEMPHIS, TN, 17-18 APRIL 2012 Paleolithic Foragers of the Hrazdan Gorge, Armenia Daniel Adler, Anthropology, University of Connecticut, USA B. Yeritsyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA K. Wilkinson, Archaeology, Winchester University, UNITED KINGDOM R. Pinhasi, Archaeology, UC Cork, IRELAND B. Gasparyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA For more than a century numerous archaeological sites attributed to the Middle Paleolithic have been investigated in the Southern Caucasus, but to date few have been excavated, analyzed, or dated using modern techniques. Thus only a handful of sites provide the contextual data necessary to address evolutionary questions regarding regional hominin adaptations and life-ways. This talk will consider current archaeological research in the Southern Caucasus, specifically that being conducted in the Republic of Armenia. While the relative frequency of well-studied Middle Paleolithic sites in the Southern Caucasus is low, those considered in this talk, Nor Geghi 1 (late Middle Pleistocene) and Lusakert Cave 1 (Upper Pleistocene), span a variety of environmental, temporal, and cultural contexts that provide fragmentary glimpses into what were complex and evolving patterns of subsistence, settlement, and mobility over the last ~200,000 years. While a sample of two sites is too small to attempt a serious reconstruction of Middle Paleolithic life-ways across such a vast and environmentally diverse region, the sites
    [Show full text]
  • Lascaux Cave, France  Complex Hunter Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic  Dates: 47/45,000 – 20/18,000 B.P
    Lascaux Cave, France Complex Hunter Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic Dates: 47/45,000 – 20/18,000 b.p. (Epipaleolithic=20/18,000-10,000 bp) Industries include microliths and bone tools—not found in previous periods Raw materials were exchanged over long distances in this period Wide range of materials, other than flint, come into use: bone tools, stone vessels, ochre, shells Some probably for ritual purposes In contrast to early modern humans (and Neanderthals): Size of teeth reduced Size of jaw reduced Muscularity diminishes Less skeletal trauma Increased longevity Cro-Magnon cranium Upper Paleolithic Artwork Cave Art Includes spectacular images of animals and abstract forms and, rarely, humans Mobiliary Art These portable art objects include Venus figurines Body Ornamentation: Pierced shells, pierced animal teeth, and bone beads were most likely work as necklaces or attached to clothing Horse, Cosquer Cave, France Penquin or Auk, Cosquer Cave, France Bear Bison ‘Venus’ figurines Dolni Vestonice Lespugue Willendorf . Appear around 25,000 bp, Europe . Carved in ivory, wood, stone, modeled in clay . Breasts, hips, buttocks, thighs, usually large . Head, arms, hands, legs & feet are only schematic . Some are pregnant, others are not 4.48.jpg Dwellings Huts with bone frameworks Floors with inlaid stone Stone-lined pits for hearths Tailored clothing Long-distance trade Blade technique Long, parallel-sided flakes are struck off the edges of a specially prepared core Blades: long flake, twice as punch long as wide • Sharp parallel edges • Removed from core like peeling carrot (sort of) • Blades provide “blank” or form, which may then be shaped into different tools: .
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Aestheticus’
    Conceptual Paper Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 11 Issue 3 - June 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Shuchi Srivastava DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2020.11.555815 Man and Artistic Expression: Emergence of ‘Homo Aestheticus’ Shuchi Srivastava* Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, University of Lucknow, India Submission: May 30, 2020; Published: June 16, 2020 *Corresponding author: Shuchi Srivastava, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, An Autonomous College of University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India Abstract Man is a member of animal kingdom like all other animals but his unique feature is culture. Cultural activities involve art and artistic expressions which are the earliest methods of emotional manifestation through sign. The present paper deals with the origin of the artistic expression of the man, i.e. the emergence of ‘Homo aestheticus’ and discussed various related aspects. It is basically a conceptual paper; history of art begins with humanity. In his artistic instincts and attainments, man expressed his vigour, his ability to establish a gainful and optimistictherefore, mainlyrelationship the secondary with his environmentsources of data to humanizehave been nature. used for Their the behaviorsstudy. Overall as artists findings was reveal one of that the man selection is artistic characteristics by nature suitableand the for the progress of the human species. Evidence from extensive analysis of cave art and home art suggests that humans have also been ‘Homo aestheticus’ since their origins. Keywords: Man; Art; Artistic expression; Homo aestheticus; Prehistoric art; Palaeolithic art; Cave art; Home art Introduction ‘Sahityasangeetkalavihinah, Sakshatpashuh Maybe it was the time when some African apelike creatures to 7 million years ago, the first human ancestors were appeared.
    [Show full text]