DOCSLIB.ORG

Insurv Autism Awareness Walk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insurv Autism Awareness Walk Volume 9 | Issue 4 | May 2018 Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center News MARMC’s KEY ROLE IN HELPING SHIPS COMPLETE INsURV AUTISM AWARENESS WALK FEATURED STORIES MARMC, Nitze Completes SRA The Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) got underway from Naval Station Norfolk for sea trials April 6 26, marking the end of a seven-month Selective Restricted Availability (SRA). Quick Fix to Harpoon System: Normandy Deploys On-Time Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center’s (MARMC) SSD, Strike and Data Link Branch successfully repaired 9 damaged cabling to USS Normandy’s (CG 60) Harpoon Weapon System. MARMC’s Key Role in Helping Ships Complete INSURV The Arleigh-Burke-class guided missile destroyer USS Bainbridge (DDG 96) successfully completed their first 10 INSURV. Code 900 in Action Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center’s Outside Machine Shop, assisted by MARMC’s Engineering Department, 12 successfully swapped out the starboard boat davit on USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98), Asian Pacific American Heritage Month Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month recognizes the challenges faced by Asian Americans, Pacific 14 Islanders, and Native Hawaiians and their vital contributions to the American story. The Maintainer is the official Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center publication. All comments of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Department of the Navy. This is a monthly newsletter and the deadline for submission of articles is the fifth of each month. Correspondence should be directed to Public Affairs, Code 1100P, Building LF-18 or email: [email protected]. 2 STRAIGHT TALK WITH CAPT. LANNAMANN Greetings Team MARMC, repeat last year’s performance. Currently, we have 20 avails in execution with another COI want to start off by congratulating that is still waiting to be awarded. You have everyone at Mid-Atlantic Regional Main- heard both Mr. Bevington and myself talk tenance Center (MARMC) on earning the about this for the last few months. MARMC Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) Ex- is in the midst of the heaviest workload cellence Award for Fiscal Year 2017. This the command has ever seen. To add more truly is a team award, and everyone at the pressure, we are also still enduring grow- command had a hand in helping us not ing pains with the firm-fixed price con- only reach our goals, but to exceed ex- tracting strategy. As we work through our pectations within the fleet. We had many process, there are times when the plan pose numerous safety risks each day. It is challenges last year, chief among them doesn’t come together as we envisioned it, refreshing to know that you are heading was our support of both USS Wasp (LHD and we have to make on the fly decisions the culture of safety and making it a part 1) and USS Ramage (DDG 61). We not only that could potentially have huge impacts of your everyday work routine. Please con- delivered these ships back to the fleet in down the road. This means that we are tinue these efforts as it is a critical piece of a timely fashion – we did so with keeping working swiftly to come up with the right what we do that can easily be overlooked. I up with our previously scheduled main- solutions, while at the same time trying to want each and every MARMC employee to tenance availabilities. Whether you an- forecast the best we can to mitigate fu- return home at the end of their shift safely swered a trouble call, helped procure a ture issues. Taking on this task for one ship to their friends and families. contract, gave personnel support or phys- alone would be a challenge, but having 20 A few more congratulations are in ically turned a wrench – you all did your and soon to be 21 to manage at the same order for the command’s most recent Cap- jobs professionally and up held the stan- time can be daunting. Nevertheless, our tain Selects. Our Executive Officer Cmdr. dard of what an RMC should be. I couldn’t team has already shown that we have the Eric Williams and Production Officer Cmdr. be more proud and humbled by this te- knowledge to enact innovative solutions, Rey Tanap are among the new class of am’s talent and your ability to do the hard which will shape the way the Navy per- Navy captains. Both are very deserving work and meet the mission no matter the forms ship maintenance and moderniza- of the promotion. Machinist’s Mate Senior circumstances. Bravo Zulu (BZ) to all on a tion for the foreseeable future. In order for Chief Jason Myhre was also recently se- job well done! us to stay on top and deliver another peak lected for promotion to Master Chief Petty Now, in 2018, we have a new set of ob- performance this year, just like last year, it Officer. If you see any of these gentlemen, stacles laid in front of us on our quest to will take everyone at the command doing please join me in congratulating them on a their part. I have no doubt that we can and job well done! will answer the call of the fleet with all of As a reminder for MARMC Sailors, we your unwavering support. are quickly approaching the July 1, dead- With last year’s Comprehensive Re- line to transition to the Type III Navy Work- view, I asked the command to take a look ing Uniforms. There is still time to obtain inward at some of our practices and pro- your new uniform before the summer rush. cedures to ensure that we are being as I urge anyone who has not already made safe as possible in our work environments. the transition to do so sooner than later. As Whether it be wearing your Personal Pro- I opened my comments with, MARMC is tective Equipment or following the proper currently the standard for RMC excellence guidelines for the work you are conduct- and I want us to stay on top. We can only ing, Safety will continue to be of the up- do so by staying disciplined in all aspects most importance. This month, our Safety of our responsibilities. 101 As we approach the 101 days of sum- CRITICAL DAYS Department Head Frank Walker was able to give a few BZs to maintenance teams mer, I ask you all to continue to be safe OF SUMMER working on USS Anzio (CG 68), USS Mesa both at work and in your home life. Enjoy Verde (LPD 19) and USS Stout (DDG 55) the weather as it warms up and be sure to for identifying safety hazards/violations allow for down time if you are ever feeling May 28–Sept 3 and bringing them to the appropriate folks too stressed. We work in a very demand- who could give the proper corrective ac- ing industry, and you all deserve time to tion. This demonstrates to me that you all recharge. I look forward to your successes are taking the safety piece of your job se- over the next month and appreciate all that riously. A large majority of our work takes you do in making our Navy mission ready place in industrial shipyard settings, which every day you come to work! 3 EXECUTIVE DIRECTor’s NOTES One way I hope to accomplish this is I ask members of the command to not through the already established command use the pronouns, “I, me or my.” I want to EDbook club. I recently read a book titled promote a culture of togetherness here at Work, by Thich Nhat Hanh. The premise is MARMC, and instead of any one person how to find joy and meaning in each hour of having to feel the pressure and weight of the day, and it speaks to setting your inten- a particular tasking, they should feel free to tions at the onset of your day. It also looks share the responsibility and use teamwork at mindful breathing, deep listening, and to meet our goals. No one person is going meditation before meetings. As I was read- to be able to take on all that we have been ing this, it peaked my interest because we charged to do at this time. Whether we are Recently, Capt. Lannamann and I trav- currently have a lot going on workload wise asked to deliver a ship on time or to com- eled to Great Lakes, Illinois, for the Com- and I know that can bring an abundance of plete an upward obligation package, these manders Leadership Forum. While we stress to our workforce. Having our plates are team-centric tasks. It is going to take were there, Commander, Naval Service full has created tension between some of input from around the command in order Training Command Rear Adm. Michael D. our departments, which is to be expected for us to be successful. I think it would be Bernacchi spoke about the changes he when we have such a close working fam- really cool if by changing the way we speak made to the eight weeks of training that re- ily. But, I thought we could explore these about our responsibilities, we could impact cruits receive while in boot camp. He took ideas together as a group. This will include the culture and create an environment that a long look at the curriculum and was able a little bit of reading and study, then put- helps deescalate stress rather than add to to free up about two weeks that they were ting some of these ideas into practice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Supply Corps
    SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2017 SUPPOs Supplying the Fight A Message from the Chief of Supply Corps Recognizing the central importance of supply to establishing the Navy, President George Washington laid the foundation for the U.S. Navy Supply Corps in 1775 with the appointment of Tench Francis, a Philadelphia businessman, as the country’s first Purveyor of Public Supplies. Francis provided vital support to the first Navy ships, and started our tradition of selfless service. The Navy’s trusted providers of supplies, our supply officers (SUPPOs) keep operations running smoothly to support the mission. But they can’t do it alone. Working as a team with their skilled and experienced enlisted members, our SUPPOs are experts in our field who know inventory and financial management, food, retail, postal operations, and disbursing management. They are leaders and problem solvers who tackle complex challenges to implement effective and efficient management solutions, ensuring our customers’ needs are met. To be “Ready for Sea,” we must be professionally ready with the skills to operate in all our lines of operation. We also need character readiness, demonstrated by our integrity, accountabili- ty, initiative, and toughness. Lastly, we need to be individually ready; to be fit, healthy, and ready to meet the demands of the fight. This issue provides insights from our SUPPOs’ important work as they meet the unique needs of their various commands. Like the pursuers and paymasters who have gone before, SUPPOs uphold our rich heritage, and embrace their responsibilities to support the warfighter with a servant’s heart. Our SUPPO’s success depends on their character and competence, knowledge of the shore infrastructure, relationships with our professional civilian workforce, and on the enlisted members they lead and serve with.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbuilding Plan
    Report to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels Prepared by: Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Warfighting Requirements and Capabilities - OPNAV N9) 2000 Navy Pentagon Washington, DC 20350-2000 Approved for Release by: Office of the Secretary of Defense December 9, 2020 The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $265,000 in Fiscal Years 2019 - 2020. This includes $20,000 in expenses and $245,000 in DoD labor. 2020Feb28 RefID: 2-295B307 Table of Contents I. Reporting Requirement ...........................................................................................3 II. Submission of the Report ........................................................................................3 III. Analytic Context .....................................................................................................3 IV. Fiscal Context .........................................................................................................3 V. Plan Objectives – Priorities ......................................................................................3 VI. Unmanned Systems ..................................................................................................4 VII. Industrial Base..........................................................................................................4 VIII. Shipbuilding Plan .....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Key US Aircraft and Ships for Strikes on Iraq
    CSIS_______________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775-3270 Key US Aircraft and Ships for Strikes on Iraq Anthony H. Cordesman CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment February 16, 1998 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Key US Ships and Aircraft for Strikes on Iraq 3/2/98 Page 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................................... 2 F-15 EAGLE ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................. 5 F-16 FIGHTING FALCON................................................................................................................................. 7 FEATURES.......................................................................................................................................................... 7 BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................................................... 7 B-1B LANCER..................................................................................................................................................... 9 MISSION.............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Ticonderoga Class Cruiser Operating Targets for Other Consumables, Repair Parts, and Administrative Expenditures
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2008-06 Analysis of Ticonderoga Class Cruiser operating targets for other consumables, repair parts, and administrative expenditures Mills, Jeffery S. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/10344 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA MBA PROFESSIONAL REPORT Analysis of Ticonderoga Class Cruiser Operating Targets for Other Consumables, Repair Parts, and Administrative Expenditures By: Jeffery S. Mills Jason C. Warner Edison C. Rush III June 2008 Advisors: Kenneth Euske Dan Matthews Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2008 MBA Professional Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Analysis of Ticonderoga Class Cruiser Operating 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Targets for Other Consumables, Repair Parts, and Administrative Expenditures 6.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Commissionings,” Last Updated August 2, 2018
    U.S. Navy n A Design for Maintaining Maritime Supe- to revisit their assumptions about gaining ac- Iriority, Version 1.0, issued in January 2016, cess to key regions. Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John M. Together, these functional areas—power Richardson describes the U.S. Navy’s mission projection, sea control, maritime security, de- as follows: terrence, and domain access—constitute the basis for the Navy’s strategy. Achieving and The United States Navy will be ready to sustaining the ability to excel in these func- conduct prompt and sustained combat tions drives Navy thinking and programmat- incident to operations at sea. Our Navy ic efforts. will protect America from attack and As the U.S. military’s primary maritime preserve America’s strategic influence in arm, the Navy provides the enduring forward key regions of the world. U.S. naval forces global presence that enables the United States and operations—from the sea floor to to respond quickly to crises around the world. space, from deep water to the littorals, Unlike land forces (or even, to a large extent, and in the information domain—will deter air forces), which are tethered to a set of fixed, aggression and enable peaceful resolu- larger-scale support bases that require consent tion of crises on terms acceptable to the from host nations, the U.S. Navy can operate United States and our allies and partners. freely across the globe and shift its presence If deterrence fails, the Navy will conduct wherever needed without any other nation’s decisive combat operations to defeat permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces
    United States Office of Water EPA 821-R-99-001 Environmental Protection 4303 April 1999 Agency PHASE I UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS FOR VESSELS OF THE ARMED FORCES TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT Technical Development Document for Phase I Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces Naval Sea Systems Command U.S. Department of the Navy Arlington, VA 22202 and Engineering and Analysis Division Office of Science and Technology Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 April, 1999 FOREWORD This Technical Development Document was produced jointly by the Naval Sea Systems Command of the United States Navy and the Office of Water of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The purpose of this document is to provide, in part, the technical background that was used to develop the Phase I regulation that is issued under authority of the Uniform National Discharge Standards provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C., 1322(n). TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................ES-1 CHAPTER 1. BACKGROUND OF THE UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Legal Authority and Statutory Requirements for the UNDS Regulations ................ 1-2 1.2.1 Discharges.................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 Vessels ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cooperative Engagement Capability*
    SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT The Cooperative Engagement Capability* revolutionary approach to air defense has been extensively evaluated recently. The approach is a new Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) that allows combat Asystems to share unfiltered sensor measurements data associated with tracks with rapid timing and precision to enable the battlegroup units to operate as one. The CEC system and the program for Fleet introduction are described. Further, the results of recent testing as well as new CEC concepts applied to multiwarfare, joint-services, and Allied operations are discussed. The role of the Applied Physics Laboratory from conception through our current leadership efforts is also highlighted. INTRODUCTION Operation in the littoral theater is a principal Navy situation because of its unique characteristics and van- 1990s scenario with complexities never considered in tage point. Amidst this disparity in knowledge among the Cold War era. For theater air defense, the complex- coordinating units are efforts to correlate target tracks ities include the natural environment and its effects on and identification data via conventional command/ sensor range. For example, desensitization by clutter control systems and to coordinate 20 to 30 missile from propagation ducting and rough terrain, as well as launchers and a comparable number of interceptor blockage by coastal mountains and cliffs, reduces the aircraft. time available for a defensive system to react. In addi tion, Coalescing this collection of equipment into a single commercial, nonbelligerent aircraft and ships compound war-fighting entity requires a system that will comple- ment both new-generation and older air defense sys tems the already difficult problem of sorting friends, neutrals, by sharing sensor, decision, and engagement data among and hostiles during major Allied op erations involving combatant units, yet without compromising the time- many other ships and aircraft (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2022 Budget Overview
    Preface The Overview Book has been published as part of the President’s Annual Defense Budget for the past few years. From FY 1969 to FY 2005, OSD published the “Annual Defense Report” (ADR) to meet 10 USC section 113 requirements. Subsequently, the Overview began to fill this role. The Overview is one part of an extensive set of materials that constitute the presentation and justification of the President’s Budget for FY 2022. This document and all other publications for this and previous DoD budgets are available from the public web site of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller): http://comptroller.defense.gov. The Press Release and Budget Briefing, often referred to as the “Budget Rollout,” and the Program Acquisition Costs by Weapons System book, which includes summary details on major DoD acquisition programs (i.e., aircraft, ground forces programs, shipbuilding, space systems, etc.) are especially relevant. The website for Performance Improvement tables and charts is https://cmo.defense.gov/Publications/Annual-Performance-Plan-and-Performance-Report/. Other background information can be accessed at www.defense.gov. The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $31,000 for the 2021 Fiscal Year. This includes $13,000 in expenses a nd $18,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2021May19 RefID: 4-93DCDF7 i This page intentionally left blank ii Overview – FY 2022 Defense Budget Table of Contents 1. FY 2022 Budget Summary 1-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Interim National Security Strategic Guidance – Renewing America’s Advantages .............. 1-3 FY 2022 Budget Request Overview ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS U. S. Department Of
    OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 December 2016 U. S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration OBSOLETE SHIPS RESERVE FLEET MARITIME ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..…………………………………………………………...... 2 I. Ship Disposal Programs ….………………………………………………….. 5 Domestic Scrap Steel Prices …………………………………………………. 5 Domestic Recycling Industry ………………………………………………… 7 Federal Ship Outreach ……………………………………………………….. 8 Planned Vessel Retirement Schedules ………………………………………. 11 European Ship Recycling Regulation ………………………………………... 13 Environmental Stewardship ………………………………………………….. 14 Ship Disposal Alternatives …………………………………………………… 15 Best Value Ship Disposal Source Selection …………………………………. 16 Ship Disposal Funding ……………………………………………………….. 17 Sales Revenues ………………………………………………………………. 18 Fiscal Year 2017 Disposal Activities ………………………………………… 19 Five Year Disposal Program Projections …………………………………….. 19 Ship Disposal Performance Measures ……………………………………….. 21 Environmental Regulation and Related Legal Challenges ………………….. 23 II. N.S. Savannah ……………………………………………………………….... 24 Licensed Activities …………………………………………………………... 24 Stewardship ………………………………………………………………….. 25 Protective Storage ……………………………………………………………. 26 FY 2016 Significant Activities ………………………………………………. 26 III. Conclusions …………………………………………………………………… 28 IV. Appendix United States Army Corp of Engineers – List of Vessels ……………………. 29 United States Department of the Army – List of Vessels ……………………. 30 United States Maritime
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEMBER 2009 • ALL HANDS 1 December 2009
    December 2009 NOVEMBER 2009 • ALL HANDS 1 Robert Bowker welds the initials of Susan Ford Bales into the keel of the aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) during a keel laying and authentication ceremony at Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Newport News, Va. Photo by MC2 Kevin S. O’Brien [On the Front Cover] MM3 Anthony Roman inspects a torpedo tube [Departments] aboard USS Henry M. Jackson (SSBN 730). [Number 1113] Photo by MC2 Gretchen Albercht Around the Fleet — 6 [Next Month] This Just In — 32 Look for the 16th edition of the January Owners’ Something to Think About — 36 and Operators’ Manual. Focus on Service — 38 18 SSBN: 50 Years of History— 40 Strength Through Deterrence Fleet ballistic missile submarines have been patrolling December the world’s oceans for 50 years. Submarine size and capabilities may have changed through the years, but the Sailors who call a 560-foot submarine “home” have stayed as vigilant and ready as ever to 12 Around the Horn prevent war. Building Hope The Seabees of Naval Mobile Construction Battalion (NMCB) 11 have been involved in a vast number of humanitarian missions throughout Africa to help strengthen the bonds between the Joint Task Force currently serving in the Horn of Africa and the people located in and around their area of responsibility. Photo by MC2 Erick S. Holmes 26 A Career of Service: An Inside Look at the 75th Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus took the oath as the 75th United States Secretary of the Navy, May 19, 2009. This is a presidential appointment he doesn’t take lightly, and a job that consists of so much more than just being in a Pentagon office.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry – Navy Discussions
    THE FORCE BEHIND THE FLEET INDUSTRY – NAVY DISCUSSIONS 16 March 2017 17 AUGUST 2017 NAVY – INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP MEETING FLEET MAINTENANCE AND MODERNIZATION SYMPOSIUM (FMMS) Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is Unlimited. EXPAND THE ADVANTAGE Industry – Navy Meeting THE FORCE BEHIND THE FLEET Time Topic Facilitator/Speaker Objectives, Activities, Deliverables 1230 All personnel seated 1230-1245 Action Item Review CDR Tommy Neville Objective: Mr. Bill Crow • Provide the current progress on Top 5 action items 1245-1330 Industry On-Time Delivery Mr. Bill Crow Objective: Initiatives/Recommendations • Industry to provide an overview of different initiatives and recommendation to help drive On Time Delivery (OTD) 1330-1345 NAVSEA Standard Item (NSI) Mr. Dale Hirschman Objective: Review Follow Up Mr. Bill Crow • Follow up on NSI Review from morning session • Clearly understand current status, actions and way ahead at the senior leadership level 1345-1400 Break 1400-1430 GG/LSD Update CAPT Kevin Byrne Objective: • Discuss the current status of CG/LSD modernization 1430-1515 Dry Dock Update Mr. Tom Laverghetta Objective: • Discuss the current status of dry dock capacity issues and potential solutions 1515-1545 Split CLIN Overview CDR Tommy Neville Objective: • Overview of proposed Split CLIN methodology • Collect Industry feedback on proposal 1545-1600 Meeting Wrap Up & Questions CDR Tommy Neville Objective: • Overview of New Action Items • Questions • Set next meeting date 1600 Adjourn Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is Unlimited 2 Action Item Review DESIGN, BUILD, DELIVER AND MAINTAIN SHIPS AND SYSTEMS ON TIME AND ON EXPAND THE ADVANTAGE COST FOR THE UNITED STATES NAVY CDR Tommy Neville Mr.
    [Show full text]