DOCSLIB.ORG

US Navy Program Guide 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Navy Program Guide 2013 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2013 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s most lethal, To implement the vision of my Sailing Directions and flexible, and capable maritime force. As the Defense Strategic Guidance, we will enhance endur- they have throughout our Nation’s history, every day our ing capabilities—such as our undersea dominance—and Sailors operate forward to provide American leaders with develop new ones to overcome threats to our freedom of timely options to deter aggression, assure allies, and re- action and to exploit adversary vulnerabilities. We will spond to crises with a minimal footprint ashore. field and integrate new unmanned air vehicles into our During 2012, the Navy remained the Nation’s front line in carrier air wings and accelerate procedures and systems conflict and in peace. The USS John C. Stennis deployed to make the electromagnetic spectrum and cyberspace twice to the Middle East in support of our troops in Af- a primary warfighting domain. We will enable sustained ghanistan, and the USS Bataan Amphibious Ready Group operations at key maritime crossroads around the world operated forward there for nearly 11 months. We honed through increased forward basing and by fielding new our coalition mine warfare skills in a 34-nation exercise in ships such as the Littoral Combat Ships, Joint High Speed the Arabian Gulf. We demonstrated our combined anti- Vessels, and Mobile Landing Platforms with rotating civil- submarine, missile defense, surface warfare, and humani- ian and military crews. We will ensure the proficiency and tarian assistance and disaster response capabilities with confidence of today’s Fleet with today’s systems and weap- 22 partner nations in the 2012 Rim of the Pacific exercise. ons, and will continue to attack sexual assault and suicide, And we assembled 25 ships and 14,000 personnel to rein- which threaten the safety, readiness, and well being of vigorate Navy-Marine Corps amphibious warfare skills in our Sailors. Exercise Bold Alligator. Our Nation and military face unprecedented fiscal As directed by the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance challenges and thus the Navy has had to make tough Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st choices in building our Fiscal Year 2014 Navy Program. Century Defense, the Navy also formulated and imple- This program delivers the capacity to meet global pres- mented a plan to rebalance our forces, their homeports, ence requirements and builds the capability to address our capabilities, and our intellectual capital and part- the primary missions outlined in the Defense Strategic nerships toward the Asia-Pacific. As we continue this Guidance. Through continued innovation, efficiency, and rebalance toward the Asia-Pacific, we will also support judicious application of resources, our Navy will remain the Nation’s transition from a decade of conflict in the world’s preeminent maritime force. Iraq and Afghanistan by retaining a strong naval force to support our partners in the Middle East and address threats to stability there. Jonathan W. Greenert Admiral, U.S. Navy Chief of Naval Operations TABLE OF CONTENTS MEETING TODAY’S CHALLENGES Joint Mission Planning Systems (JMPS) 39 AND PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE 1 Joint Precision Approach and Landing System (JPALS) 40 A Maritime Nation 2 Military Flight Operations Quality Assurance (MFOQA) 41 Sailing Directions 2 Warfighting First 3 SECTION 2: SURFACE COMBATANTS 43 Operate Forward 6 SHIPS 44 Be Ready 7 CG 47 Ticonderoga-Class Aegis Guided Missile Cruiser Rebalance to the Asia-Pacific 8 Modernization 44 Foundation for the Future 10 DDG 1000 Zumwalt-Class Destroyer 45 DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-Class Aegis Guided-Missile Destroyer 46 SECTION 1: NAVAL AVIATION 11 DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-Class Aegis Guided Missile Destroyer Modernization 47 AIRCRAFT CARRIER 12 FFG 7 Oliver Hazard Perry-Class Guided Missile CVN 68 Nimitz-Class and CVN 78 Ford-Class Frigate Modernization 48 Aircraft Carrier Programs 12 Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) 48 AIRCRAFT 13 PC 1 Cyclone-Class Patrol Coastal Modernization Program 50 AH-1Z and UH-1Y Upgrades 13 AV-8B Harrier II+ 14 SURFACE WEAPONS 51 C-130T Hercules 15 Advanced Gun System (AGS) 51 C-2A(R) Greyhound 15 Long-Range Land-Attack Projectile (LRLAP) 51 Service Secretary Controlled Aircraft/Executive Airlift 16 Mk 15 Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) 52 C-40A Clipper 17 Mk 38 Mod 2 Stabilized 25mm Chain Gun 53 CH-53K (HLR) Heavy Lift Replacement 17 Mk 45 Mod 4 5-Inch/62-Caliber Gun System Upgrade 53 EA-18G Growler Airborne Electronic Attack Aircraft 18 Mk 54 Lightweight Torpedo (LWT) 54 EA-6B Prowler Airborne Electronic Attack Aircraft 19 RGM/UGM-109E Tomahawk Land-Attack Missile (TLAM) 54 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter 20 RIM-7, Mk 57 NATO SeaSparrow Surface Missile System (NSSMS) and RIM-162 Evolved SeaSparrow Missile (ESSM) 55 F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Strike-Fighter Aircraft 20 RIM-116A Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) 56 F/A-18A-D Hornet Strike-Fighter Aircraft 22 RIM-66C Standard Missile-2 Blocks III/IIIA/IIIB 57 HH-60H Seahawk 23 SM-6 Standard Missile 6 Extended-Range Active KC-130J Hercules Tactical Tanker and Transport 23 Missile (ERAM) Block I/II 57 MH-53E Sea Dragon 24 MH-60 R/S Seahawk Multi-Mission Combat Helicopters 24 SURFACE SENSORS AND COMBAT SYSTEMS 58 MV-22 Osprey 25 Aegis Ashore 58 Naval Aviation Training Aircraft 26 Aegis Combat System (ACS) 59 P-8A Poseidon Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft (MMA) 28 Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) 60 P-3C Orion Modification, Improvement, and Sustainment 29 AN/SPY-1 AEGIS Multi-Function Phased-Array Radar 60 VXX Presidential Replacement Helicopter 30 AN/SPY-3 MFR Advanced Multi-Function Radar (MFR) 61 Littoral Combat Ship Mission Packages 61 AVIATION WEAPONS 30 Maritime Integrated Air and Missile Defense Planning System (MIPS) 63 AAGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) 30 Naval Fires Control System (NFCS) 64 AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) 31 Navigation 64 AIM-120 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) 32 Navy Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) 65 AIM-9X Sidewinder Short Range Air-to-Air Missile 32 Open Architecture OA 65 Airborne Mine Neutralization System (AMNS) 33 S-Band Volume Search Radar (VSR) 66 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) (GBU-31/32/38) / Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) 67 Laser JDAM (GBU-54) 33 SPQ-9B Radar Anti-Ship Cruise Missile (ASCM) Radar 68 Paveway II (GBU-10/12/16) Laser Guided Bomb (LGB) / SQQ-89 Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Combat System 68 Dual-Mode LGB / Paveway III (GBU-24) 34 Surface Ship Torpedo Defense (SSTD) 69 Tactical Tomahawk Weapon Control System (TTWCS) 71 AVIATION SENSORS 35 Tomahawk Command and Control System (TC2S) 72 Airborne Laser Mine Detection System (ALMDS) 35 ALR-67(V)3 Advanced Special Receiver 35 SURFACE EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING SYSTEMS 73 APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Radar System 35 Authorized Equipage Lists (AEL) and ASQ-228 Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infra-Red (ATFLIR) 36 Naval Security Forces Vest (NSFV) 73 Battle Force Tactical Trainer (BFTT) 73 AVIATION EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS 37 Biometrics / Identity Dominance System (IDS) 74 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) 37 CBRN Dismounted Reconnaissance, Sets, Integrated Defensive Electronic Counter-Measures (IDECM) 38 Kits and Outfits (CBRN DR SKO) 75 Joint and Allied Threat Awareness System (JATAS) 38 ii U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2013 Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense - SECTION 5: Individual Protection Equipment - Readiness Improvement Program INFORMATION DOMINANCE 105 (CBRND - IPE - RIP) 76 COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS 106 Improved (Chemical Agent) Point Detection System – Automated Digital Network System (ADNS) 106 Lifecycle Replacement 77 Base Communications Office (BCO) 107 Joint Biological Tactical Detection System (JBTDS) 77 Base Level Information Infrastructure (BLII) 107 Joint Service General-Purpose Mask (JSGPM) 77 Battle Force Tactical Network (BFTN) 108 Shipboard Collective Protection System (CPS) 78 Commercial Satellite Communications (COMSATCOM) 109 Network Tactical Common Data Link (NTCDL) 110 SECTION 3: SUBMARINE FORCE 79 Consolidated Afloat Network Enterprise System (CANES) 111 SUBMARINES AND UNDERSEA VEHICLES 80 Defense Red Switch Network (DRSN) 112 Ohio-Class Replacement (OR) Fleet Ballistic-Missile Submarine 80 Digital Modular Radio (DMR) 113 SSN 774 Virginia-Class Nuclear-Powered Attack Submarine 81 DoD Teleport 113 Submarine Rescue Chamber / Diving and Recompression System (SRC / SRDRS) 82 Enterprise Services 114 Global Broadcast Service (GBS) 115 SUBMARINE WEAPONS 83 Information Systems Security Program (ISSP) 116 Mk 48 Advanced Capability (ADCAP) Common Broadband Integrated Broadcast Service/Joint Tactical Terminal (IBS/JTT) 117 Advanced Sonar System (CBASS) Torpedo 83 Navy Multi-band Terminal (NMT) 118 UGM-133A Trident II/D5 Submarine-Launched Next-Generation Enterprise Network (NGEN) 119 Ballistic Missile (SLBM) 84 OCONUS Navy Enterprise Network (ONE-Net) 120 Submarine Communications Equipment 121 SUBMARINE SENSORS 84 Super-High-Frequency (SHF) Satellite Communications 122 BQQ-10 Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion (ARCI) 84 Telephony 123 SUBMARINE EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS 85 INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, BYG-1 Submarine Combat Control System 85 AND RECONNAISSANCE (ISR) 124 Submarine Escape (SEIE) 86 Airborne Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW) Intelligence (AAI) 124 Submarine Survivability 87 EP-3E AIRES II Spiral 3 125 Fixed Surveillance Systems (FSS) 126 SECTION 4: EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 89 Large Displacement Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (LDUUV) 126 EXPEDITIONARY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning the Salvo Competition Rebalancing America’S Air and Missile Defenses
    WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK 2016 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2016 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mark Gunzinger is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Gunzinger has served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces Transformation and Resources. A retired Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot, he joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2004. Mark was appointed to the Senior Executive Service and served as Principal Director of the Department’s central staff for the 2005–2006 Quadrennial Defense Review. Following the QDR, he served as Director for Defense Transformation, Force Planning and Resources on the National Security Council staff. Mr. Gunzinger holds an M.S. in National Security Strategy from the National War College, a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, a Master of Public Administration from Central Michigan University, and a B.S. in chemistry from the United States Air Force Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to loe removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 WASHINGTON IRVING CHAMBERS: INNOVATION, PROFESSIONALIZATION, AND THE NEW NAVY, 1872-1919 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorof Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephen Kenneth Stein, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 160 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, APRIL 7, 2014 No. 56 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was teered for the U.S. Army in 1967 and is Chamber of Commerce and the south- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- a decorated Vietnam veteran. He was eastern Indiana Shrine Club. He also pore (Mr. WOLF). awarded the Bronze Star for saving a served on the Dearborn County Hos- f man’s life and also earned a Combat In- pital board of trustees. fantry Badge and four Air Medals. Both Allen Paul and Johnny Nugent DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO After being honorably discharged serve as shining examples of what it TEMPORE from the Army, Allen was elected to means to be a public servant. I ask the The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- the State senate in 1986, where he was entire Sixth Congressional District to fore the House the following commu- a tireless advocate for military mem- join me in recognizing these two out- nication from the Speaker: bers and their families. He passed im- standing Hoosier legislators. WASHINGTON, DC, portant legislation to help veterans re- I have no doubt these great men will April 7, 2014. ceive a college degree and supported bring the same commitment, dedica- I hereby appoint the Honorable FRANK R. legislation to offer in-state tuition for tion, and enthusiasm that they have WOLF to act as Speaker pro tempore on this veterans.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report DE-EE0005380: Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Final Report DE-EE0005380 Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Effects on Sea Surface, Subsurface and Airborne Electronic Systems Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Prepared by: Hao Ling (UT) Mark F. Hamilton (ARL:UT) Rajan Bhalla (SAIC) Walter E. Brown (ARL:UT) Todd A. Hay (ARL:UT) Nicholas J. Whitelonis (UT) Shang-Te Yang (UT) Aale R. Naqvi (UT) 9/30/2013 DE-EE0005380 The University of Texas at Austin Notice and Disclaimer This report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study benefited from the advice, technical responses and comments of an expert group of stakeholders. That group of contributors and reviewers included representatives from academia, private corporations, national laboratories, and a broad spectrum of federal agencies. ii DE-EE0005380 The University of Texas at Austin Acknowledgments For their support of this report, the authors thank the entire U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind & Water Power Technologies Program team, and in particular Brian Connor, Gary Norton, Bryan Miller, Michael Hahn, Gretchen Andrus, and Patrick Gilman.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring Our Veterans and Families for Their Selfless Commitment to Our Country and Community
    SALUTE TO VETERANS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2020 • DAILY COURIER, Grants Pass, Oregon — 7D Howard Lewis Cochran Lester Crawford Derral Wampler Helen Arlene Huddleston Steve W. Laible Lara Anne Briseno U.S. Army Air Corps U.S. Army U.S. Army U.S. Army U.S. Air Force U.S. Army Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Technical Sergeant Specialist 4 Technical Sergeant Major Captain Major Years of service: Years of service: Years of service: 1943-1946 Years of service: 1967-1971 Years of service: Years of service: 1943-1945 1982-1989 Where served: Corvallis; South Where served: Korea, Vietnam, 1971-1993 Seven Where served: Where served: Germany; Pacific (Philippines) Germany, United States Where served: Texas; Korea; Where served: Brooke Army 31 B-17 missions over Europe Texas Washington, D.C.; Hawaii; Hospital, Texas; Guantanamo California Bay, Cuba; Iraq Alan Crews Earl Humphrey David L. Sparks William J. “Bill” Morgan U.S. Air Force U.S. Army U.S. Army and National Guard U.S. Coast Guard Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Broham Tucker Lonnie Dean Rockey Highest rank achieved: Highest rank achieved: Lieutenant Colonel Private 1st Class U.S. Navy U.S. Coast Guard Specialist E-4 Petty Officer 3rd Class Years of service: Years of service: 1944-1946 Highest rank achieved: and National Guard Years of service: Years of service: 1967-1993, 1995-2003 Where served: European Engine Man 3rd Class Highest rank achieved: 1971-1974 1968-1972 Where served: Vietnam; Theater Years of service: Seaman Where served: Washington; Ui Where served: Vietnam (1969- Korea; England; Germany; 1965-1968; Naval Reserve Years of service: Jong Bu, South Korea 1970) United States through 1971 1950-1953 Where served: USS Blandy Where served: Japan; Seattle; (Mediterranean, Caribbean); Portland USS Harnett County (Vietnam river patrol) Albert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Garuda Shield 2016
    DermagaLEADING IN PORT INFORMATION www.majalahdermaga.co.id - Edisi 214 - September 2016 FREE MAGAZINE DUKUNG GERAKAN NON TUNAI PEDULI PENDIDIKAN PROGRAM PR PELINDO III PELINDO III TERAPKAN e-PORT KOPELINDO3 KUCURKAN DANA RATUSAN JUTA UNGGULI BUMN LAIN INHOUSE MAGAZINE AWARD GARUDA SHIELD 2016 ALUTSISTA PASUKAN MILITER PBB BONGKAR DI TANJUNG WANGI Selamat & Sukses HUT Ke-18 PT PORTEK Indonesia Apa Kabar Pembaca? Dermaga Edisi 214 - September 2016 eptember menjadi bulan istimewa bagi seluruh insan perhubungan. REDAKSI: Pelindung Direksi PT Pelabuhan Setiap tanggal 17 September, seluruh insan perhubungan memperingati Indonesia III (Persero). Pengarah Sekretaris Perusahaan Pelindo III. Hari Perhubungan Nasional. Peringatan Hari Perhubungan Nasional harus Pemimpin Redaksi Edi Priyanto. Redaktur Pelaksana dimaknai sebagai momentum yang tepat untuk merenungkan kembali Camelia Ariestanty. Koordinator Liputan Sseluruh kinerja dan berbagai peristiwa yang terjadi di sektor perhubungan Wilis Aji Wiranata, R. Suryo Khasabu. serta menyatukan persepsi dan tekad untuk meningkatkan pelayanan kepada Koordinator Distribusi Ardella Trastiana masyarakat. Kementerian Perhubungan sebagai regulator yang bertanggung jawab Dewi. Administrasi Esmi Ratna Purwasih. atas penyelenggaraan perhubungan sedang dan terus berupaya meningkatkan Fotografer Kharis Fauzi kinerja melalui reformasi dan transformasi terus dilakukan untuk meningkatkan akses keselamatan dan pelayanan masyarakat. Kontributor: Asep Hermawan, Diah Ayu Tekad untuk meningkatkan pelayanan harus dilaksanakan
    [Show full text]
  • CG 68 Anzio [Ticonderoga Baseline 4, VLS] - 1994 SM-2MR Blk III
    CG 68 Anzio [Ticonderoga Baseline 4, VLS] - 1994 SM-2MR Blk III United States Type: CG - Guided Missile Cruiser Max Speed: 35 kt Commissioned: 1994 Length: 172.8 m Beam: 16.8 m Draft: 9.6 m Crew: 379 Displacement: 8910 t Displacement Full: 9466 t Propulsion: 4x General Electric LM-2500 Gas Turbines, COGAG Sensors / EW: - AN/SQS-53C(V)1 - Hull Sonar, Active/Passive, Hull Sonar, Active/Passive Search & Track, Max range: 74.1 km - AN/SQR-19B(V)1 TACTAS - (1992, CG Version) TASS, Passive-Only Towed Array Sonar System, TASS, Passive-Only Towed Array Sonar System, Max range: 129.6 km - AN/SPY-1B MFR - (1992, CG Version) Radar, Radar, FCR, Surface-to-Air, Long-Range, Max range: 324.1 km - AN/SLQ-32(V)3 [ECM] - (Group, 1983) ECM, OECM & DECM, Offensive & Defensive ECM, Max range: 0 km - AN/SLQ-32(V)3 [ESM] - (Group, 1983) ESM, ELINT, Max range: 926 km - AN/SPG-62 [Mk99 FCS] - (Group, 1983) Radar, Radar Illuminator, Long-Range, Max range: 305.6 km - AN/SPQ-9 [Mk86 GFCS] - (Group, 1983) Radar, Radar, Target Indicator, 3D Surface-to-Air & Surface-to-Surface, Max range: 37 km - AN/SPS-49(V)7 AEGIS - (Group, 1983) Radar, Radar, Air Search, 2D Long-Range, Max range: 463 km - AN/SPS-55 - (Group, 1983) Radar, Radar, Surface Search & Navigation, Max range: 64.8 km - AN/SPS-64(V)9 [RM 1220 6X] - (20kW, USN, 1x antenna) Radar, Radar, Surface Search & Navigation, Max range: 37 km - Mk1 Mod 2 ROS - (20kW, USN, 1x antenna) Visual, LLTV, Weapon Director & Target Search, Slaved Tracking and Identification, Max range: 185.2 km Weapons / Loadouts: - 25mm/75 Bushmaster Mod 1 Burst [12 rnds] - Gun.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac by Susan H.H
    Gallery of USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac By Susan H.H. Young Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2007. Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying missions over intercontinental range, then penetrating enemy defenses with the largest pay- load of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 67. Unit Location: Dyess AFB, Tex., Ellsworth AFB, S.D., Edwards AFB, Calif. Contractor: Boeing; AIL Systems; General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbo- fans, each 30,780 lb thrust. B-1B Lancer (Richard VanderMeulen) Accommodation: four, pilot, copilot, and two systems officers (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. B-1B. Initiated in 1981, the first production model of Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Dimensions: span spread 137 ft, swept aft 79 ft, length the improved variant B-1 flew in October 1984. USAF Contractor: Northrop Grumman; Boeing; Vought. 146 ft, height 34 ft. produced a total of 100. The active B-1B inventory was Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbo- Weights: empty equipped 192,000 lb, max operating reduced to 67 aircraft (from the remaining 92) with con- fans, each 17,300 lb thrust. weight 477,000 lb. solidation to two main operating bases within Air Combat Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines
    The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Product Code #F655 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Aviation Gas Turbine Forecast Analysis 5 The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 The Competitive Environment...............................................................................................................................3 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................4 Table 1 - The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ..................................................5 Table 2 - The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019...................................................8 Figure
    [Show full text]