DOCSLIB.ORG

Cs Nicolăescu-Plopşor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XX/2019 FOUNDING EDITOR: EDITORIAL BOARD: Vladimir OSIAC (University of Craiova, Acad. Dan BERINDEI (Romanian Academy, Romania) Romania); Acad. Victor SPINEI (Romanian Academy, EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Cezar Gabriel AVRAM (C.S. Nicolăescu- Nicolae PANEA (University of Craiova, Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies Romania); and Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Lucian DINDIRICĂ (The Alexandru and Aristia DEPUTY EDITOR IN CHIEF: Aman County Library, Romania); Mihaela BĂRBIERU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Simona LAZĂR (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies and Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Nicolae MIHAI (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Institute for Research in Social Studies and Patrick CHARLOT (University of Bourgogne, Humanities, Craiova, Romania); France); Ion MILITARU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Shpakovskaya Marina ANATOLIEVNA Institute for Research in Social Studies and (People’s Friendship University of Russia); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Karina Paulina MARCZUK (University of Şerban PĂTRAŞCU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Warsaw, Poland); Institute for Research in Social Studies and Teodora KALEYNSKA (Sf. Cyril and Sf. Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Methodius University of VelikoTurnovo, Roxana RADU (University of Craiova, Romania) Bulgaria); Anatol PETRENCU (Moldova State University, Chişinău, Moldova); Virgiliu BÎRLĂDEANU (Institute of Social ROMANIAN ACADEMY PUBLISHING History, Chişinău, Moldova) HOUSE EDITORS: Monica STANCIU ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C. S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XX/2019 EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE Bucharest, 2019 Copyright © Editura Academiei Române, 2019. EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE Calea 13 Septembrie nr. 13, Sector 5 050711, Bucureşti, România Tel: 4021 318 81 46, 4021 318 81 06 Fax: 4021 318 24 44 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ear.ro “C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities Yearbook (Online) ISSN: 2501-0468; ISSN-L: 1841-0898. is published yearly by the “C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities of the Romanian Academy. Computer Editing: Maria LAZĂR Cover: Mariana ŞERBĂNESCU © Editura Academiei Române, 2019 “C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopsor” Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities Yearbook, (Online) ISSN: 2501-0468, ISSN: 1841-0898 print; is indexed in ERIHPLUS, Index Copernicus, CEEOL (Central and Eastern European Online Library), DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), International Institute of Organized Research (I2OR), International Innovative Journal Impact Factor (IIJIF), SIS, MIAR, Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI). CONTENTS ETHNOGRAPHY AND ARCHEOLOGY: IRON AGE, TRADITIONAL SPACE, RITUAL ELEMENTS Simona LAZĂR, Considerations about the metal objects in Oltenia at the Late Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age ................................................................................................... 7 Anca CEAUȘESCU, Traditions, customs and ritual practices related to The Great Departure along the Oltenian Danube Valley ......................................................................................... 15 Loredana-Maria ILIN-GROZOIU, Romanian ethnological references in the writings of Anton-Maria del Chiaro ................................................................................................. 23 THE CHURCH IN SOCIETY AND NATIONAL HISTORY Marusia CÎRSTEA, The relationships of the Romanian Orthodox Church with the Anglican Church – Patriarch Miron Cristea’s journey to London (1936) ..................................... 31 Marian GROZOIU, Florin Sabin MIHAIL, The acknowledgement and the promotion of culture through the process of evangelization ....................................................................... 47 Mihaela BĂRBIERU, Aspects of political and diplomatic relations of Romania in the first decade of the “reign” of Nicolae Ceaușescu (1965–1975) ............................................. 55 Gabriela BOANGIU, Contribution of Photography to the Recognition of Great Union of Romania ... 69 Florin NACU, Personalities of Oltenia – promotors of modernization (1821–1914)................ 81 ECONOMIC DYNAMICS AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Georgeta GHIONEA, Economy overview in the development of Craiova. Minority entrepreneurs (the XIXth and the first half of the XXth century) ......................................................................... 93 Narcisa Maria MITU, Craiova a foreign investors’ attraction (the end of the XIXth – first half of the XXth century) .................................................................................................. 101 Ileana CIOAREC, The landed property of Filişeanu family from Dolj and Mehedinţi counties ....... 111 PHILOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS Iustina BURCI, The presence of appellative “vineyard” in the toponymy from Oltenia ......... 121 Ionela Carmen BANȚA, Some considerations regarding the concept of myth (definitions, classifications)................................................................................................................ 135 Antoaneta Laura SAVA, Aspects on addressing the affirmation of the human dignity concept in the modern period philosophy ........................................................................................... 145 „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” – YEARBOOK/ANUARUL, vol. XX, 2019, pp. 1–206 ROMANIAN LEGISLATION AND EUROPEAN SOCIETY: ACTUALITY AND CHALLENGE Roxana Cristina RADU, The legal framework for employing Romanian citizens abroad......... 155 Răzvan SCAFEȘ, Conflict of interest in the procedure of alternative dispute resolution between consumers and banking professionals .............................................................. 165 Livia POGAN, Emerging research milestones for social sciences in a smart society............... 171 Alexandra PORUMBESCU, Subsidiarity, regions and cohesion in the European Union ...... 181 Sorin DINULESCU, Romania's participation in the economic development policy of the European Union ............................................................................................................. 191 NOTES Notes on some International Congresses, by Gabriela BOANGIU .......................................... 203 6 ETHNOGRAPHY AND ARCHEOLOGY: IRON AGE, TRADITIONAL SPACE, RITUAL ELEMENTS CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE METAL OBJECTS IN OLTENIA AT THE LATE BRONZE AGE AND THE EARLY IRON AGE∗ ∗∗ Simona LAZĂR Abstract: The image given by the distribution of the bronze items (including the golden pieces) shows us clearly enough the grouping of the discoveries from two regions of the studied area. The first contain the Banat and the north-east of Serbia (the inferior basin of Morava and the region Majdanpek) with a prolonging along the Danube through the Clisură and downstream, in Oltenia. The second, feebler in discoveries of metal objects, includes the central and the Subcarpathian Oltenia. This image corresponds to that resulting from the classifying of the ceramic groups and, most probable, reflects a historical-cultural reality. Bronze deposits discoveries, either those from the hoards or the individual ones (especially the swords), don’t represent an exception for the studied area. Discussing about the bronze hoards is that related to the signification and the interpretation of the deposing. They reflect the social and the economic interrelations and, not at last, the ideological ones, specific to the communities. Keywords: the Bronze Age, the Early Iron Age, the metal objects, the bronze hoards, casting forms, Oltenia. Oltenia is characterized, from the point of view of the spreading of the metal objects, by the quite clear distinction between two zones of influence: the Danube area, oriented towards the middle Danube basin and the Subcarpathian area oriented towards the northern, trans-Carpathian zone. It appears quite clear that the number of bronzes from the studied area (especially Oltenia and the Danube area) is relatively small compared with the inter-Carpathian area or middle Danube basin. It is slightly higher but if you compare it to the southern regions, especially in Bulgaria. This observation is noted for clearer celts1, sickles2, and the swords3. As stated, our area is part of the ∗ The article is part of a research project Dezvoltarea economico-socială a comunităţilor preistorice din Oltenia, included in the research programme of “C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” Institute for Socio-Human Research, Craiova: “Dezvoltarea economico-socială, politică şi culturală a Olteniei istorice, condiţie a integrării în comunitatea euroregiunilor”. ∗∗ 3rd Degree Scientific Researcher, PhD., “C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities from Craiova, of the Romanian Academy; E-mail: [email protected]. 1 S. Lazăr, Sfârșitul epocii bronzului și începutul epocii fierului în sud-vestul României, Craiova, Universitaria Publishing, 2011, pp. 87–96. 2 Ibidem, pp. 87–97. „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” – YEARBOOK/ANUARUL, vol. XX, 2019, pp. 7–13 8 Simona LAZĂR marginal area that includes the spreading of the socketed type axes, the number of specimens of this kind being in a clear decreasing from southern areas
Recommended publications
  • British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World

    British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World

    British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War This page intentionally left blank British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War Dennis Deletant Visiting ‘Ion Ra¸tiu’ Professor of Romanian Studies, Georgetown University, USA © Dennis Deletant 2016 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2016 978–1–137–57451–0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2016 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries.
  • Bucharest Booklet

    Bucharest Booklet

    Contact: Website: www.eadsociety.com Facebook: www.facebook.com/EADSociety Twitter (@EADSociety): www.twitter.com/EADSociety Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/eadsociety/ Google+: www.google.com/+EADSociety LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/euro-atlantic- diplomacy-society YouTube: www.youtube.com/c/Eadsociety Contents History of Romania ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 What you can visit in Bucharest ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Where to Eat or Drink ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 Night life in Bucharest ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Travel in Romania ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....10 Other recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 BUCHAREST, ROMANIA MIDDLE AGES MODERN ERA Unlike plenty other European capitals, Bucharest does not boast of a For several centuries after the reign of Vlad the Impaler, millenniums-long history. The first historical reference to this city under Bucharest, irrespective of its constantly increasing the name of Bucharest dates back to the Middle Ages, in 1459. chiefdom on the political scene of Wallachia, did undergo The story goes, however, that Bucharest was founded several centuries the Ottoman rule (it was a vassal of the Empire), the earlier, by a controversial and rather legendary character named Bucur Russian occupation, as well as short intermittent periods of (from where the name of the city is said to derive). What is certain is the Hapsburg
  • Revista Istorică

    Revista Istorică

    REVISTA ISTORICĂ SERIE NOUĂ TOMUL XIX, NR. 1–2 ianuarie–aprilie 2008 S U M A R IN HONOREM ŞERBAN PAPACOSTEA STATALITATE ŞI INSTITUŢII – ÎNTEMEIEREA ŢĂRILOR ROMÂNE ANDREI PIPPIDI, La originile Ţării Româneşti ...................................................................... 5 ŞTEFAN ANDREESCU, Exarhatul. Geneza instituţiei în Ţara Românească şi Moldova ........ 21 LIVIU PILAT, Sfântul Scaun şi întemeierea Moldovei ............................................................. 29 MATEI CAZACU, O controversă: Thocomerius – Negru Vodă ............................................... 49 SERGIU IOSIPESCU, Bătălia de la Posada (9–12 noiembrie 1330). O contribuţie la critica izvoarelor istoriei de început a principatului Ţării Româneşti ........................................ 59 CULT ŞI ETNIE NAGY PIENARU, Otomanii şi Habsburgii. Diplomaţie şi confesiune. Două documente otomane din 1616 ........................................................................................................... 83 ALEXANDRU CIOCÎLTAN, Contrareforma la Câmpulung. Noi documente (1635–1646)..... 99 CULTURĂ ŞI POLITICĂ ILEANA CĂZAN, Cronica Ghiculeştilor. Discurs istoriografic şi realităţi politice internaţionale (1699–1739) .................................................................................................................... 119 NICOLAE LIU, Orizont european în Iluminismul românesc. Francofonie şi cultură franceză.. 135 AMINTIRI ŞI CORESPONDENŢĂ GEORGETA FILITTI, Scrisori de altădată. Din trecutul familiei Aricescu .............................
  • (ESMP) OBOR FIRE-FIGHTING DETACHMENT, Bucharest

    (ESMP) OBOR FIRE-FIGHTING DETACHMENT, Bucharest

    Ministry of Internal Affairs Department of Emergency Situations General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) OBOR FIRE-FIGHTING DETACHMENT, Bucharest July 2021 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 10 1.1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.2 BACKGROUND 10 1.3 PROJECT CONCEPT – ROMANIA DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT 11 1.4 RATIONALE FOR PREPARATION OF ESMP 12 2. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 15 2.1 NATIONAL LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 15 4. OBOR SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION 21 4.1 SUB-PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS 21 4.2 CURRENT STATE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS 22 4.3 PROPOSED DEMOLITION WORKS 23 4.4 PROPOSED NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 24 4.5 TEMPORARY FACILITIES REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE 27 5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SUB-PROJECT ACTIVITIES 28 CONSIDERATIONS ON BUILDIG HYSTORY AND CURRENT SITUATION 28 5.1 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND RISKS 32 5.2 PROJECT SOCIAL IMPACTS AND RISKS 32 6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 35 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES 35 6.2. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY 38 7. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MONITORING PLAN 39 8. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 40 8.1. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 40 8.2 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ESMP IMPLEMENTATION 43 8.3 CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING 43 9. MONITORING, SUPERVISION AND REPORTING 45 10. STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 46 10.1. STAKEHOLDER MAPPING 46 10.2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 47 11. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 48 12. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 49 2 ANNEX 1. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES 51 ANNEX 2.
  • V. ROMANIA (Application No. 18811/02) DEFINITIVE 27/08/2010

    V. ROMANIA (Application No. 18811/02) DEFINITIVE 27/08/2010

    THIRD SECTION CASE OF HOHENZOLLERN (FROM ROMANIA) v. ROMANIA (Application No. 18811/02) STOP STRASBOURG 27 May 2010 DEFINITIVE 27/08/2010 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to formal amendments. CASE OF HOHENZOLLERN (FROM ROMANIA) v. ROMANIA In the case of de Hohenzollern (of Romania) v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting in a Chamber composed of : Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura, Corneliu Bîrsan, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Egbert Myjer, Luis López Guerra, Ann Power, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar, After deliberation in chambers on 4 May 2010, delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 18811/02) against Romania lodged with the Court on 22 April 2002 under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by two British and Romanian nationals, Mr Carol Mircea Grigore de Hohenzollern (of Romania) and Mr Paul Philip de Hohenzollern (of Romania) respectively. The applicants are represented by Tamara Solecki, a London lawyer. 2. The Romanian Government ("the Government") is represented by its Agent, Mr Răzvan-Horaţiu Radu, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. Following the death of the first applicant, his wife, Mrs Antonia Colville Ropner Hohenzollern, and his son, the second applicant, expressed a wish to continue the proceedings on 16 February 2006. Mrs Antonia Colville Ropner Hohenzollern also died in 2007, leaving Mrs Emma Louise Ropner as her heir, who did not send the Court a request to continue the proceedings.
  • Planul Integrat De Dezvoltare Urbana (Pidu)

    Planul Integrat De Dezvoltare Urbana (Pidu)

    Bucharest Central Area Integrated Urban Development Plan 1. Recovering the urban identity for the Central area. Today, for many inhabitants, the historic center means only the Lipscani area, which is a simplification of history. We are trying to revitalize and reconnect the different areas which constitute the center of Bucharest, from Victory Square to Carol Park, having the quality of urban life for city residents as a priority and trying to create a city brand for tourists and investors. 2. Recovering the central area located south of the Dambovita river. Almost a quarter of surveyed Bucharest residents had not heard of areas like Antim or Uranus, a result of the brutal urban interventions of the 1980s when, after intense demolitions, fragments of the old town have become enclaves hidden behind the high- rise communist buildings. Bridges over Dambovita disappeared, and whole areas south of the river are now lifeless. We want to reconnect the torn urban tissue and redefine the area located south of Dambovita. recover this part of town by building pedestrian bridges over the river and reconstituting the old ways of Rahovei and Uranus streets as a pedestrian and bicycle priority route. 3. Model of sustainable alternative transportation. Traffic is a major problem for the Bucharest city center. The center should not be a transit area through Bucharest and by encouraging the development of rings and the outside belt, car traffic in the downtown area can easily decrease. We should prioritize alternative forms of transportation - for decades used on a regular basis by most European cities: improve transportation connections and establish a network of streets with priority for cyclists and pedestrians to cross the Center.
  • Academos Nr 4, 2012 Pentru PDF.Indd

    Academos Nr 4, 2012 Pentru PDF.Indd

    CUPRINS akademos E. Tofan. O recompensă pentru un istoric, care a ales calea de a crea viitorul . ....................3 Preşedintele Poloniei Bronislaw Komorowski, DHC al AŞM. Polonia, un exemplu demn de urmat pentru Moldova ..........................................................................................................5 Revistă de ştiinţă, E. Tofan. 2012: distincţii pentru ştiinţă şi inovare . ................................................................9 inovare, cultură şi artă Acad. Gh. Duca, drd. S. Porcescu. Un an de la asocierea Republicii Moldova la PC7 ....... 11 Înregistrată la Ministerul Justiţiei la Dr. V. Kulciţki. Conceptul de cercetare şi inovare responsabilă reflectat în Programul 25.05.2005, nr. 189. „Orizont 2020" . .......................................................................................................................14 M. cor. I.Guceac. O nouă platformă strategică pentru comunitatea ştiinţifică . ....................16 Acad. V. Canţer, acad. S. Toma, dr.hab. V. Minciună, dr. L. Bileţchi. Evaluarea şi acredita- rea ştiinţifică – una din modalităţile de ierarhizare a instituţiilor de cercetare . .......................19 Dr. hab. T. Spătaru. De la performanţă în cercetare la teze de doctorat de excelenţă . .........26 Cerc. A. Ciobanu (IIT AR), dr. hab. S. Cojocaru (IMI, AŞM), m. cor. C. Gaindric (IMI, AŞM), dr. G. Magariu (IMI, AŞM), m. cor. Horia N. Teodorescu (IIT, AR), cerc. T. Verlan (IMI, AŞM). Sistem analitic informaţional pentru managementul activităţii de cercetare ....31 Dr. E. Hîrbu.
  • Booking Bucharest the City Guide RO

    Booking Bucharest the City Guide RO

    www.bookingbucharest.ro 1 Cuprins: 1.PREZENTARE GENERALĂ MUNICIPIUL BUCUREŞTI .........................................................pag 3 2.MOMENTE ISTORICE IMPORTANTE ..........................................................................................pag 8 3.ECONOMIE .............................................................................................................................................pag 17 4.PRIMA DATĂ ÎN BUCUREŞTI .......................................................................................................pag 20 4.1Cum ajungem?......................................................................................................................pag 20 4.2Transportul în Bucureşti.................................................................................................pag 20 4.3Unde ne cazăm?...................................................................................................................pag 22 4.4Ce manacam?........................................................................................................................pag 23 5.SFATURI DE CALATORIE ................................................................................................. pag 24 6.TRASEE IN BUCUREŞTI ...................................................................................................................pag 26 6.1Centrul istoric-Principala atractie a Bucurestiului..............................................pag 27 6.2Pe Calea Victoriei in Micul Paris...................................................................................pag
  • Directory of Development Organizations

    Directory of Development Organizations

    EDITION 2007 VOLUME III.B / EUROPE DIRECTORY OF DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, GOVERNMENTS, PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES, CIVIL SOCIETY, UNIVERSITIES, GRANTMAKERS, BANKS, MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING FIRMS Resource Guide to Development Organizations and the Internet Introduction Welcome to the directory of development organizations 2007, Volume III: Europe The directory of development organizations, listing 51.500 development organizations, has been prepared to facilitate international cooperation and knowledge sharing in development work, both among civil society organizations, research institutions, governments and the private sector. The directory aims to promote interaction and active partnerships among key development organisations in civil society, including NGOs, trade unions, faith-based organizations, indigenous peoples movements, foundations and research centres. In creating opportunities for dialogue with governments and private sector, civil society organizations are helping to amplify the voices of the poorest people in the decisions that affect their lives, improve development effectiveness and sustainability and hold governments and policymakers publicly accountable. In particular, the directory is intended to provide a comprehensive source of reference for development practitioners, researchers, donor employees, and policymakers who are committed to good governance, sustainable development and poverty reduction, through: the financial sector and microfinance,
  • Nr. Crt. Nume Arie Naturală Protejată Cod Național

    Nr. Crt. Nume Arie Naturală Protejată Cod Național

    Nr. Crt. Nume Arie Naturală Protejată Cod Na țional 1 Zona naturală protejată Scrovi ștea 1.1990 2 Detunata Goală 2.1. 3 Râpa Ro șie 2.2. 4 Detunata Flocoasă 2.3. 5 Oul Ar șiței 2.5. 6 Stânca Grunzii 2.7. 7 Piatra Despicată 2.8. 8 Pe ștera Vânătările Ponorului 2.9. 9 Pe ștera Ghețarul Scărișoara 2.10. 10 Pe ștera Ghețarul de la Vârtop 2.11. 11 Cheile Râme țului 2.12. 12 Huda lui Papară 2.13. 13 Pădurea Vidolm 2.14. 14 Poiana cu narcise de la Negrileasa 2.15. 15 Molha șurile Căpățânei 2.16. 16 Poienile cu narcise din Tec șești 2.17. 17 Iezerul Șurianul 2.18. 18 Calcarele de la Ampoi ța 2.19. 19 Cheile Întregalde 2.20. 20 Cheile Văli șoarei 2.21. 21 Șesul Craiului - Scărița - Belioara 2.22. 22 Calcarele cu orbitoline de la Piatra Corbului 2.23. 23 Dealul cu Melci 2.24. 24 Pârâul Bobii 2.25. 25 Calcarele de la Valea Mică 2.26. 26 Pădurea Sloboda 2.27. 27 Iezerul Ighiel 2.28. 28 Tăul fără fund de la Băgău 2.29. 29 Cheile Gârdi șoarei 2.30. 30 Cheile Ordâncu șei 2.31. 31 Cheile Albacului 2.32. 32 Cheile Văii Morilor 2.33. 33 Cheile Po șegii 2.34. 34 Cheile Runcului 2.35. 35 Cheile Pociovali ștei 2.36. 36 Cheile Glodului 2.37. 37 Cheile Cibului 2.38. 38 Cheile Caprei 2.39. 39 Cheile Ampoi ței 2.40. 40 Cheile Văii Ce ții 2.41.
  • A Physical and Moral Portrait of Balkan Vlachs In

    A Physical and Moral Portrait of Balkan Vlachs In

    MUZEUL NAŢIONAL Vol. XX 2008 A PHYSICAL AND MORAL PORTRAIT OF BALKAN VLACHS IN HISTORICAL SOURCES (IXth-XIIth CENTURIES) DESPRE PORTRETUL FIZIC ŞI MORAL AL VLAHILOR BALCANICI ÎN SURSELE ISTORICE (SECOLELE IX-XII) Ginel Lazăr, Monica Lazăr Abstract Like any other people, the Balkan Vlachs (Romanians) came into being and defined themselves as an entity during a long and difficult historical process. Ethnoculturally and historically they share similarities but also differences which bring them closer, but also separate them from neighbouring peoples. Balkan Romanians’ physical and moral traits are differently perceived from one observer to another. For Byzantines, „Vlachs“ meant „barbarians“, namely those who didn’t speak, think or live like a Greek. Ever since Vlachs have been first mentioned in historical sources (approx. 850) until the Asanesti rebellion (1185), „the physical and moral portrait of Balkan Vlachs differs with each observer. Latin authors, especially Italians and Dalmatians, depicted them favourably, mainly highlighting their bellicose attributes and their pleasant appearance, sometimes associated to their Roman descent. On the contrary, they are often negatively perceived by their Balkan neighbours. This is not surprising at all: for Byzantines and Southern Slavics, endowed with their own states and cultures, the Vlach is „the other“, a foreigner refusing integration by asserting his own identity and even worse - often trying to establish his own state in an area they claimed“. Key words: „Romanus“, „the other“, transhumance, „kjelatori“, Haemus, Vlachs, Christians. Like any other people, the Balkan Vlachs (Romanians) came into being and defined themselves as an entity during a long and difficult historical process. Ethnoculturally and historically they share similarities but also differences which bring them closer, but also separate them from neighbouring peoples.
  • Mihai-Cristian Amăriuţei, Lidia Cotovanu, Ovidiu-Victor

    Mihai-Cristian Amăriuţei, Lidia Cotovanu, Ovidiu-Victor

    MIHAI-CRISTIAN AMĂRIUŢEI, LIDIA COTOVANU, OVIDIU-VICTOR OLAR, Phanariot Donations to the Mega Spileon Monastery (18th Century) Abstract: The monastery of Great Cave (Mega Spileon) from Moreea has occupied a special place in the consciousness of the Eastern Christianity subjected to the Ottoman sultan, being at a certain moment named the New Jerusalem. According to tradition, this monastery keeps a miracle-working icon of the Holy Virgin painted by the holy Apostle and Evangelist Luke. This monastery received donations from ‘Phanariote’ princes of Moldova and Wallachia. The chronology of these donations seems to connect their beginning to the restoration of Ottoman rule in Pelopones and the return of the monastery (with other monasteries from the region) under the jurisdiction of the Patriarchy of Constantinople in 1715-16. Although it is possible that occasional aids were sent to this monastery in early sixteenth century, the lack of consistent Romanian donations to Pelopones in general and especially to Mega Spileon may be explain by the lack of migration from that region to northern Danube. The first donations of Moldavian and Wallachia princes to the Great Cave “imperial and patriarchal” monastery belong to those from Ghica family, while they were ruling in Wallachia in eighteenth century. These initiatives originated essentially in the attribute of Byzantine inspiration, which gave the prince the role of patron of the Orthodox Church supplemented by motivations concerned with devotional traditions of the economy of salvation, the expressing of filial piety of donors, social assistance practices and administration of properties acquired by emigrants in their destination countries. There is a long series of donations made by various Ghica princes – Gregory Ghica, 1733-35, 1748-52, Matei Ghica, 1752-53, Scarlat Ghica, probably in both his reigns in Bucharest and for sure on 5 February 1759, Alexandru Scarlat Ghica on 20 February 1768, Grigore III Ghica on 6 February 1769.