DOCSLIB.ORG

Ordinance No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). Governmental Ordinance no. 39 of 14 July 2005 on Cinematography Text in force as of 21 June 2007 (Text updated on the basis of the modifying normative acts published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, until 18 June 2007) : - Law no. 328/2006 for the approval of the Government Ordinance no. 39/2005 was adopted with amendments, as follows; - Government Emergency Ordinance no. 97/2006, approved and amended by Law no. 145/2007; - Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 227/2007*; - Law no. 145/2007; - Law no. 174/2007. At present, the normative acts marked with asterisk (*) are being modified, repealed or rejected and the amendments made by means of these norme acts on Government Ordinance no. 39/2005 are no longer valid NOTE: By Order of the Minister of Culture and Religious Affairs no. 2379/2006, the methodological norms for the implementation of the Governmental Ordinance no. 39/2005 on Cinematography were approved. On the grounds of Article 108 of the republished Constitution of Romania and of Article1, paragraph VII.3 of Law no. 209/2005 on the empowerment of the Government to issue ordinances, The Government of Romania has adopted the present ordinance. 1 DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). CHAPTER 1 General provisions ARTICLE 1 (1) The present ordinance regulates the general background for developing activities within the field of cinematography, the support of the development of the film industry, of culture and cinematographic education in Romania, the way of constituting and of using the financial resources for fulfilling, distributing, exploiting and archiving the creations of the national cinematography, the administration of goods that are a part of the national cinematographic heritage, as well as the organization of the National Centre of Cinematography as a specialized body of the central public administration in the field of cinematography. (2) From the provisions of the present ordinance benefit the natural and legal Romanian persons, as well as those from the Member States of the European Union, authorized as such, in keeping with the principles of the freedom of establishment, of the free movement of goods and services, as well as of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality. ARTICLE 2 Regulation of the activities in the field of cinematography concern mainly the following objectives: a) developing the film industry in Romania and supporting the vocational training in the field; b) encouraging the private initiative in the field of creation, financing, production, distribution and exploitiation of the Romanian films or of films that are made with Romanian participation; c) promoting the national cultural identity and of the national minorities in Romania by creation of cinematographic films and promoting the latter in the world values circuit; d) promoting an open competitive system of access to the financial credit sources in the Cinematographic Fund; e) developing the European and international cinematographic cooperation; 2 DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). f) protecting, developing and promoting the heritage of the national cinematography. ARTICLE 3 For the purposes of the present ordinance, the terms and expressions hereunder have the following meaning: a) cinematography – cultural industry of national importance, which creates added value by exploiting and spreading the cultural diversity, aiming at creating, distributing and exploiting the cinematographic films and includes the sum of activities and persons that work in this field; b) cinematographic film, hereinafter called ”film” – the final product of some artistic and technical activity specific to the field, with the aim to create fiction films, animation films, documentaries, of any duration, irrespective of the support used, and that are initially brought out by the on screen projection in cinema halls or in outdoor film theatres or in other spaces intended for this purpose; c) Romanian film – the film that is produced mainly with artistic and technical Romanian participation, according to the criteria set forth in annex no. 2, which is an integrated part of the present ordinance, observing as well the regulation issued on the basis and for the enforcement of the provisions of the present ordinance, hereinafter called “regulation”; d) co-production film – a film in which the Romanian participation to the total costs of the production cannot be lower than 20% for the bilateral co-productions and, respectively, 10 % for the multilateral co-productions set forth in this regulation; e) art film – the film that, by its artistic quality, contributes to the development of the cinematographic culture and to the national, European and universal cultural diversity, classified as such by the commission within the Registry of Cinematography; f) producer – natural or legal person authorized as such, registered with the Registry of Cinematography, which initiates and supports on its own the creation of a film, ensuring for this purposes the financial, organizational and technical conditions; g) co-producer - authorized natural or legal person, which participates with technical means and/or financial in the creation of a film; h) delegated producer (delegated person) – natural person assigned by all the co- producers, which carries out actions that are specific to the producer, on his behalf; 3 DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). i) executive producer – natural person hired by the producer, that, within the limits of the budget granted by this latter, coordinates and is responsible for the actual creation of the film within the established artistic, financial and organizational parameters; j) financer – natural or legal person that participates in the financing of a film and that has no rights attached to its negative; k) film authors – the script writer, the director, the author of the original music, as well as other natural persons that contribute in a creative way to the creation of the film, defined as such in the provisions of Law no. 8/1996 on author’s rights and neighboring rights, with further amendments and completions; l) direct credit – the reimbursable financial credit, without interest, granted from the Cinematographic Fund after winning a contest for the film production and the development of projects, according to the provisions of the regulation; m) non-reimbursable financial support – the non-reimbursable amounts of money allotted from the Cinematographic Fund, the immediate financial support of films with high success to the public and artistic quality, for the distribution and the exploitation in theaters of Romanian films or films with Romanian participation or for the organization or the participation in festivals and field fairs, as well as for supporting programmes on cinematographic culture and education or for the operating of art cinematography; n) film distributor- natural or legal person that is authorized as such, registered with the Registry of Cinematography , whose object of activity is the film distribution; o) film distribution – the activity that aims at presenting, by means of on screen projections to the public, of a film in theaters or in other spaces defined as such, selling broadcasting rights to the television channels, of video cassettes or DVDs, as well as the film import or export; p) theater – any space endowed with cinematographic equipment in view of a public presentation, by means of on screen projections, of a film where one charges the counter value of the entrance tickets; r) art theater – the theater that shows art films in a proportion of minimum 50% from the annual shows schedule, out of which at least half is reserved for the European and/or Romanian films; s) difficult films – films that may have reduced chances of cinematographic exploitation and are characterized by: a high level of creative risk, renewing the 4 DISCLAIMER: As
Recommended publications
  • Case 3:15-Mj-00157-JGM Document 74 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 62

    Case 3:15-Mj-00157-JGM Document 74 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 62

    Case 3:15-mj-00157-JGM Document 74 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 62 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT -------------------------------------------------------x : : IN THE MATTER OF THE EXTRADITION : CIV. NO. 15 MJ 157 (JGM) OF MANEA ORTANSA MIRELA1 : : : DATE: MARCH 1, 2018 -------------------------------------------------------x RULING ON REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION On August 14, 2015, this Magistrate Judge signed a complaint and arrest warrant for the arrest of Manea Ortansa Mirela [“Manea”],2 in accordance with the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Romania, and 18 U.S.C. § 3184. (Dkt. #1).3 The complaint charges Manea with convictions, in absentia, of the following offenses: (a) deceit in a continued form, offense provided by article 215(2) and (3) of the Criminal Code of Romania with the application of article 41(2), article 42 in conjunction with article 34 and article 13 of the Criminal Code of Romania; (b) the offense provided by article 40 of Law 82/1991 on accountancy, in relation to article 289 of the Criminal Code of Romania, with the application of article 41(2) of the Criminal Code of Romania; (c) forgery of documents under private signature provided by article 290 with 1See note 2 infra. 2In official documents in Romania, a person’s surname (here, Manea) usually appears before his or her given names (here, Ortansa Mirela). Romanian Names, WIKIPEDIA (last visited Feb. 24, 2018); A Guide to Names and Naming Practices -- Romania, www.fbiic.gov (March 2006)(Last visited Feb. 24, 2018). At times, Manea is also referred to in court filings by the surnames of her former husbands, Porto or Neagu.
  • CONSTITUTION of ROMANIA – Republished – the CONSTITUTION of ROMANIA of 1991 WAS AMENDED and COMPLETED by the LAW NO

    CONSTITUTION of ROMANIA – Republished – the CONSTITUTION of ROMANIA of 1991 WAS AMENDED and COMPLETED by the LAW NO

    CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA – republished – THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA OF 1991 WAS AMENDED AND COMPLETED BY THE LAW NO. 429/2003 ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA, PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 758 OF 29 OCTOBER 2003, REPUBLISHED BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 767 OF 30 OCTOBER 2003) ON THE GROUNDS OF ARTICLE 152 OF THE CONSTITUTION, WITH THE UPDATED DENOMINATIONS AND THE RENUMBERED TEXTS (ARTICLE 152 BECAME, IN THE REPUBLISHED FORM, ARTICLE 156). THE LAW NO. 429/2003 ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA WAS APPROVED BY THE NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF 18-19 OCTOBER 2003, AND CAME INTO FORCE ON 29 OCTOBER 2003, THE DATE OF THE PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 758 OF 29 OCTOBER 2003 OF THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 3 OF 22 OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF THE RESULT OF THE NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF 18-19 OCTOBER 2003 CONCERNING THE LAW ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA. THE CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA, IN ITS INITIAL FORM, WAS ADOPTED IN THE SITTING OF THE CONSTITUANT ASSEMBLY OF 21 NOVEMBER 1991, WAS PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO. 233 OF 21 NOVEMBER 1991, AND CAME INTO FORCE AFTER ITS APPROVAL BY THE NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF 8 DECEMBER 1991. CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA – republished – Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naionale a României ROMÂNIA [Constituie] Constitution of Romania. – București: Monitorul Oficial R.A., 2012 ISBN 978–973–567–770-1 342.4(498)”1991“ CONTENTS TITLE I General
  • The Alba County (Subregion Nuts 3) As an Example of a Successful Transformation- Case Study Report

    The Alba County (Subregion Nuts 3) As an Example of a Successful Transformation- Case Study Report

    THE ALBA COUNTY (SUBREGION NUTS 3) AS AN EXAMPLE OF A SUCCESSFUL TRANSFORMATION- CASE STUDY REPORT Authors: Daniela-Luminita Constantin – project scientific coordinator Zizi Goschin – WP6, Task 3 responsible Team member contributors: Constantin Mitrut, Constanta Bodea, Bogdan Ileanu, Raluca Grosu, Amalia Cristescu The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement “Growth-Innovation- Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe” (GRNCOH) 1 1. Introduction The report is devoted to assessment of current regional development in Alba county, as well as its specific responses to transformation, crisis and EU membership. This study has been conducted within the project GRINCOH, financed by VII EU Framework Research Programme. In view of preparing this report 12 in-depth interviews were carried out in 2013 with representatives of county and regional authorities, RDAs, chambers of commerce, higher education institutions, implementing authorities. Also, statistical socio-economic data were gathered and processed and strategic documents on development strategy, as well as various reports on evaluations of public policies have been studied. 1. 1. Location and history Alba is a Romanian county located in Transylvania, its capital city being Alba-Iulia. The Apuseni Mountains are in its northwestern part, while the south is dominated by the northeastern side of the Parang Mountains. In the east of the county is located the Transylvanian plateau with deep but wide valleys. The main river is Mures. The current capital city of the county has a long history. Apulensis (today Alba-Iulia) was capital of Roman Dacia and the seat of a Roman legion - Gemina.
  • “Geothermal Energy in Ilfov County - Romania”

    “Geothermal Energy in Ilfov County - Romania”

    Ilfov County Council “Geothermal energy in Ilfov County - Romania” Ionut TANASE Ilfov County Council October, 2019 Content Ilfov County Council 1. Geothermal resources in Romania 2. Geothermal resources in Bucharest-Ilfov Region 3. Project “Harnessing geothermal water resources for district heating the Emergency Hospital «Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu», Balotesti Commune, Ilfov County” 4. Project “The development of geothermal potential in the counties of Ilfov and Bihor” 5. Project ELI-NP (GSHP) 6. Possible future project in Ilfov County Romania Geothermal resources in Romania Ilfov County Council • The research for geothermal resources for energy purposes began in the early 60’s based on a detailed geological programme for hydrocarbon resources. • The geothermal potential - low-temperature geothermal systems • porous permeable formations such as the Pannonian sandstone, and siltstones specific (Western Plain, Olt Valley) or in fractured carbonate formations (Oradea, Bors and North Bucharest (Otopeni) areas). • First well for geothermal utilisation in Romania (Felix SPA Bihor) was drilled in 1885 to a depth of 51 m, yielding hot water of 49°C, maximum flow rate 195 l/s. • Since then over 250 wells have been drilled with a depth range of 800- 3,500 m, through which were discovered low-enthalpy geothermal resources with a temperature between 40 and 120°C. • The total installed capacity of the existing wells in Romania is about 480 MWth (for a reference temperature of 25°C). UCRAINE Ilfov County Council MOLDAVIA HUNGARY SATU-MARE CHIŞINĂU Acas
  • Bucharest Booklet

    Bucharest Booklet

    Contact: Website: www.eadsociety.com Facebook: www.facebook.com/EADSociety Twitter (@EADSociety): www.twitter.com/EADSociety Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/eadsociety/ Google+: www.google.com/+EADSociety LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/euro-atlantic- diplomacy-society YouTube: www.youtube.com/c/Eadsociety Contents History of Romania ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 What you can visit in Bucharest ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Where to Eat or Drink ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 Night life in Bucharest ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Travel in Romania ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....10 Other recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 BUCHAREST, ROMANIA MIDDLE AGES MODERN ERA Unlike plenty other European capitals, Bucharest does not boast of a For several centuries after the reign of Vlad the Impaler, millenniums-long history. The first historical reference to this city under Bucharest, irrespective of its constantly increasing the name of Bucharest dates back to the Middle Ages, in 1459. chiefdom on the political scene of Wallachia, did undergo The story goes, however, that Bucharest was founded several centuries the Ottoman rule (it was a vassal of the Empire), the earlier, by a controversial and rather legendary character named Bucur Russian occupation, as well as short intermittent periods of (from where the name of the city is said to derive). What is certain is the Hapsburg
  • LIST of HOSPITALS, CLINICS and PHYSICIANS with PRIVATE PRACTICE in ROMANIA Updated 04/2017

    LIST of HOSPITALS, CLINICS and PHYSICIANS with PRIVATE PRACTICE in ROMANIA Updated 04/2017

    LIST OF HOSPITALS, CLINICS AND PHYSICIANS WITH PRIVATE PRACTICE IN ROMANIA Updated 04/2017 DISCLAIMER: The U.S. Embassy Bucharest, Romania assumes no responsibility or liability for the professional ability or reputation of, or the quality of services provided by the medical professionals, medical facilities or air ambulance services whose names appear on the following lists. Names are listed alphabetically, and the order in which they appear has no other significance. Professional credentials and areas of expertise are provided directly by the medical professional, medical facility or air ambulance service. When calling from overseas, please dial the country code for Romania before the telephone number (+4). Please note that 112 is the emergency telephone number that can be dialed free of charge from any telephone or any mobile phone in order to reach emergency services (Ambulances, Fire & Rescue Service and the Police) in Romania as well as other countries of the European Union. We urge you to set up an ICE (In Case of Emergency) contact or note on your mobile phone or other portable electronics (such as Ipods), to enable first responders to get in touch with the person(s) you designated as your emergency contact(s). BUCHAREST Ambulance Services: 112 Private Ambulances SANADOR Ambulance: 021-9699 SOS Ambulance: 021-9761 BIOMEDICA Ambulance: 031-9101 State Hospitals: EMERGENCY HOSPITAL "FLOREASCA" (SPITALUL DE URGENTA "FLOREASCA") Calea Floreasca nr. 8, sector 1, Bucharest 014461 Tel: 021-599-2300 or 021-599-2308, Emergency line: 021-962 Fax: 021-599-2257 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.urgentafloreasca.ro Medical Director: Dr.
  • Anuarul Institutului De Cercetări Socio-Umane „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” “C.S

    Anuarul Institutului De Cercetări Socio-Umane „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” “C.S

    ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XVIII/2017 FOUNDING EDITOR: EDITORIAL BOARD: Vladimir OSIAC (University of Craiova, Acad. Dan BERINDEI (Romanian Academy, Romania) Romania); Acad. Dinu C. GIURESCU (Romanian Academy, EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Cezar Gabriel AVRAM (C.S. Nicolăescu- Acad. Victor SPINEI (Romanian Academy, Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies Romania); and Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Nicolae PANEA (University of Craiova, DEPUTY EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Mihaela BĂRBIERU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Lucian DINDIRICĂ (The Alexandru and Aristia Institute for Research in Social Studies and Aman County Library, Romania); Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Simona LAZĂR (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies and INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Patrick CHARLOT (University of Bourgogne, Nicolae MIHAI (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor France); Institute for Research in Social Studies and Shpakovskaya Marina ANATOLIEVNA Humanities, Craiova, Romania); (People’s Friendship University of Russia); Ion MILITARU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Karina Paulina MARCZUK (University of Institute for Research in Social Studies and Warsaw, Poland); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Teodora KALEYNSKA (Sf. Cyril and Sf. Şerban PĂTRAŞCU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Methodius University of VelikoTurnovo, Institute for Research in Social Studies and Bulgaria); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Anatol PETRENCU (Moldova State University, Roxana RADU (University of Craiova, Romania) Chişinău, Moldova); Virgiliu BÎRLĂDEANU (Institute of Social ROMANIAN ACADEMY PUBLISHING History, Chişinău, Moldova) HOUSE EDITORS: Mihaela IAMANDEI Monica STANCIU ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C. S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XVIII/2017 EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE Bucharest, 2017 Editura Academiei Române, 2017.
  • Note Regarding the Dissolution of the Working

    Note Regarding the Dissolution of the Working

    NOTE REGARDING THE DISSOLUTION OF THE WORKING POINT OF SC FONDUL PROPRIETATEA SA IN 15 CALEA VICTORIEI, ENTRANCE E, 2nd FLOOR, SECTOR 3, BUCHAREST SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS DATED 29 NOVEMBER 2010 Taking into consideration the provisions of the Articles of incorporation of SC Fondul Proprietatea SA regarding the headquarter relocation, as well as letter no. 16651 of 18 August 2010 sent by the Romanian National Securities Commission, the former Directorate of the company decided to move the registered office from 17 Apolodor St., sector 5, Bucharest (the building where the headquarter of the Ministry of Public Finance is located), to 63-81 Calea Buzesti, 7th floor, sector 1, Bucharest, according to the rental contract signed between SC Fondul Proprietatea SA and Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited United Kingdom, Bucharest Branch, on 29 July 2010. Upon establishment, the office of SC Fondul Proprietatea SA was in the same building as the headquarter of the Ministry of Public Finance, because the Ministry of Public Finance was a sole shareholder and no other headquarter was identified. In fact, the activity of SC Fondul Proprietatea SA has been developed at several working points, such as at World Trade Center and at Bucharest Financial Plaza, even since 2006. At present, the address of Bucharest Financial Plaza is registered with the National Trade Register Office as working point, although the rental contract expired on 30 June 2010. Having regard that the existence of the working point of SC Fondul Proprietatea SA in 15 Calea Victoriei, entrance E, 2nd floor, sector 3, Bucharest is no longer justified, as the rental contract expired, as well as the fact that, it is more organizationally efficient for the relation with shareholders, public institutions, our collaborators, as well as with any other third party to be managed from a single point (e.g.
  • Smart Move in the Metropolitan Area of Alba Iulia

    Smart Move in the Metropolitan Area of Alba Iulia

    RURAL SHARED MOBILITY www.ruralsharedmobility.eu SMART MOVE IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF ALBA IULIA MOVING FORWARD WITH ICT IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND SHARED MOBILITY Country: Romania OVERVIEW Short description of the Good Practice Case: The project is implemented in Alba County, and includes the largest city in the county, i.e. Alba Iulia, together with 7 adjacent rural localities (communes). The project provides integrated public transport services, operated by a single private operator, i.e. Public Transport Figure 1. Smart Move in the Metropolitan Area of Alba Company of Alba Iulia, based on a public service contract Iulia project area, with tariff zones with the designated local authority, i.e. Intercommunity Development Association for Public Transport Alba Iulia. The (source: Public Transport Company of Alba Iulia - service was introduced in October 2012 and represents an www.stpalba.ro) integrated transport offer for the city and metropolitan area. The project implementation resulted in (i) an increase of public transport users, (ii) reduction of CO2 emissions, (iii) development of an innovative cooperation structure for providing transport services in rural area – this is one of the first times when such a model is developed and implemented in Romania. Main aspect/issue addressed by the good practice Main objectives of the good practice The project addresses the following aspects: “Smart Move in the Metropolitan Area of Alba Iulia” was • Transport solutions for all; implemented as a free-standing project, with the main • The social and economic dimension of transport; purpose of ensuring better rural – urban connection, through • Regions/cities that have increased ridership thanks a public transport service with an integrated information to good marketing campaigns, improved systems service, ticketing scheme and transport timetable.
  • Planul Integrat De Dezvoltare Urbana (Pidu)

    Planul Integrat De Dezvoltare Urbana (Pidu)

    Bucharest Central Area Integrated Urban Development Plan 1. Recovering the urban identity for the Central area. Today, for many inhabitants, the historic center means only the Lipscani area, which is a simplification of history. We are trying to revitalize and reconnect the different areas which constitute the center of Bucharest, from Victory Square to Carol Park, having the quality of urban life for city residents as a priority and trying to create a city brand for tourists and investors. 2. Recovering the central area located south of the Dambovita river. Almost a quarter of surveyed Bucharest residents had not heard of areas like Antim or Uranus, a result of the brutal urban interventions of the 1980s when, after intense demolitions, fragments of the old town have become enclaves hidden behind the high- rise communist buildings. Bridges over Dambovita disappeared, and whole areas south of the river are now lifeless. We want to reconnect the torn urban tissue and redefine the area located south of Dambovita. recover this part of town by building pedestrian bridges over the river and reconstituting the old ways of Rahovei and Uranus streets as a pedestrian and bicycle priority route. 3. Model of sustainable alternative transportation. Traffic is a major problem for the Bucharest city center. The center should not be a transit area through Bucharest and by encouraging the development of rings and the outside belt, car traffic in the downtown area can easily decrease. We should prioritize alternative forms of transportation - for decades used on a regular basis by most European cities: improve transportation connections and establish a network of streets with priority for cyclists and pedestrians to cross the Center.
  • Smart Specialisation at City Level 2018-2022

    Smart Specialisation at City Level 2018-2022

    3RD DISTRICT OF BUCHAREST’S INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN FOR SMART SPECIALISATION PERIOD: 2018-2022 Document developed within the framework of the IN FOCUS – Smart Specialisation at City Level Project URBACT III Programme Partners: Bilbao, Porto, Plasencia, Ostrava, Bielsko-Biala, Frankfurt, Bordeaux Métrople, Grenoble-Alpes Métrople, Metropolitan City of Torino 3rd DISTRICT OF BUCHAREST’S INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN FOR SMART SPECIALISATION Page Foreword : Robert Sorin Negoiţă, The Mayor of 3rd District 3 Abstract 4 Content: 1. THE URBACT-IN FOCUS FRAMEWORK 6 2. COLLABORATIVE MODEL 8 2.1. The URBACT Local Group 9 2.2. Challenges and achievements 12 3. SMART SPECIALISATION AS A DRIVER 13 3.1. Vision 13 3.2. Local context 13 3.3. SWOT Analysis of the 3rd District 20 3.4. Priority domains 21 3.5. Key objectives of the Integrated Action Plan 25 4. SET OF ACTIONS AND FINANCING SOURCES 26 4.1. Set of actions 26 4.2. Financing sources 43 5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 44 5.1. Stakeholders involvement 44 5.2. Implementation calendar 45 5.3. Key Performance Indicators – KPI 46 5.4. Monitoring methodology for IAP implementation 47 5.5. Risks analysis of IAP’s implementation 48 6. CONCLUSIONS 50 ANNEXES 51 2 3rd DISTRICT OF BUCHAREST’S INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN FOR SMART SPECIALISATION FOREWORD ith nearly half a million inhabitants the 3rd District of Bucharest is the W most populous of the six districts of the capital city of Romania, and it presents numerous opportunities for economic and social development. If in the last few years the priorities of the local administrations were focused on improving public services, the urban image and the comfort of citizens in public space, as well as modernizing the educational infra- structure and ensuring the thermal rehabilitation of buildings, now it is time to channel our efforts to develop a favorable climate for business and innovation activities that can dynamize the local economy and support the sustainable develop- ment of the district in medium and long-term.
  • Bucharest Meet: Iuliu Maniu and Vasile Milea

    Bucharest Meet: Iuliu Maniu and Vasile Milea

    #welcome @ CAMPUS 6 swipe page to begin Homepage #theagenda 1.0 Futureproof 2.0 Location & Amenities 3.0 Site Plan 4.0 Placemaking & Social Impact 5.0 Interior & Innovations 6.0 Green Features 7.0 About Us 8.0 Contact 1.0 Futureproof 1 Architecture 2 Placemaking 3 Art We stand by our promise to deliver high-class offices, combining the best design practices, the principles of sustainable development and technological innovation. We offer our customers solutions that support their present and future needs. 1 Products 1 Wellbeing 2 Connected by Skanska 2 Biodiversity 3 BIM 3 Certification 1.0 Futureproof We are constantly looking for new materials and technological solutions so that our buildings are ready for the challenges of the future. INNOVATIONS What does it mean to us? Trends come and go and style evolves. Futureproof is a symbol that defines the focus areas that make Skanska a trustworthy partner. Our investments are determined by functionality, low maintenance costs and minimal impact on the environment. Located in the best spots in the city, they are highly valuable assets on the office buildings market. Sustainable development is in our company’s DNA, therefore we design and construct our buildings aiming to benefit the society and respect the environment. SUSTAINABILITY Based on our Scandinavian roots and cooperation with top-notch architects, we provide timeless and functional design of our buildings. DESIGN 2.0 Location & Amenities #welcome We designed Campus 6 with one goal: to change Campus the way people mix life and work. 6.1 Q3 2018 Campus sqm 6.2 81 000 GLA in 4 phases Q4 2019 1 000 parking places floors of office spaces Campus 10 6.3 Q3 2021 Campus 6.4 Q4 2022 POLITEHNICA UNIVERSITY Campus 6.3 Campus 6.4 Campus 6.2 Campus 6.1 Iuliu Maniu Ave.