DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update BTO Research Report No. 489 Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update Authors A.N. Banks, L.J. Wright, I.M.D. Maclean, C. Hann & M.M. Rehfisch February 2008 Report of work carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology under contract to AEWA Secretariat © British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................5 List of Figures.........................................................................................................................................7 List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................................9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................11 RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................................................13 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................15 2. AIMS & OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................17 3. PROJECT APPROACH ......................................................................................................19 3.1 Correspondents .....................................................................................................................19 3.2 Questionnaires.......................................................................................................................19 3.3 Literature Review .................................................................................................................19 3.4 Database.................................................................................................................................19 4. THE STATUS OF NON-NATIVE INTRODUCED WATERBIRDS IN THE AEWA AREA........................................................................................................................21 4.1 Non-Native Introduced Species Known To Have Bred More Than Five Times In The Wild ................................................................................................................................21 4.1.1 Sacred Ibis Threskiornis aethiopicus.......................................................................24 4.1.2 Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus and Caribbean Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber................................................................................................26 4.1.3 Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis...........................................................28 4.1.4 White-faced Whistling Duck Dendrocygna viduata...............................................30 4.1.5 Mute Swan Cygnus olor ...........................................................................................32 4.1.6 Black Swan Cygnus atratus......................................................................................35 4.1.7 Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus ...............................................................................38 4.1.8 Swan Goose Anser cygnoides...................................................................................39 4.1.9 Bean Goose Anser fabalis.........................................................................................41 4.1.10 Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus..............................................................42 4.1.11 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons.......................................................44 4.1.12 Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus ......................................................45 4.1.13 Greylag Goose Anser anser......................................................................................47 4.1.14 Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus.............................................................................51 4.1.15 Snow Goose Chen caerulescens...............................................................................53 4.1.16 Emperor Goose Chen canagicus .............................................................................54 4.1.17 Greater Canada Goose Branta canadensis & Cackling Goose Branta hutchinsii ......................................................................................................56 4.1.18 Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis ............................................................................59 4.1.19 Upland Goose Chloephaga picta..............................................................................61 4.1.20 Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca ...................................................................63 4.1.21 Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea......................................................................67 4.1.22 Muscovy Duck Cairina moschata............................................................................69 4.1.23 Wood Duck Aix sponsa ............................................................................................72 4.1.24 Mandarin Aix galericulata.......................................................................................75 4.1.25 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope.............................................................................77 4.1.26 Gadwall Anas strepera .............................................................................................78 BTO Research Report No. 489 1 February 2008 Page No. 4.1.27 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos....................................................................................79 4.1.28 Meller’s Duck Anas melleri .....................................................................................82 4.1.29 Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina...........................................................................83 4.1.30 Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis ............................................................................85 4.1.31 Purple Swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio .................................................................88 4.2 Non-Native Introduced Species That Have Bred Up To Five Times In The Wild, Or Are Not Known To Have Bred In The Wild.................................................................89 4.2.1 Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus...........................................................90 4.2.2 Pink-backed Pelican Pelecanus rufescens ..............................................................90 4.2.3 Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus......................................................................90 4.2.4 Cattle Egret Ardea ibis.............................................................................................90 4.2.5 Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax ..............................................90 4.2.6 Yellow-billed Stork Mycteria ibis ............................................................................90 4.2.7 Black Stork Ciconia nigra........................................................................................90 4.2.8 European White Stork Ciconia ciconia..................................................................91 4.2.9 Straw-necked Ibis Threskiornis spinicollis.............................................................91 4.2.10 Scarlet Ibis Eudocimus ruber...................................................................................91 4.2.11 Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus................................................................................91 4.2.12 African Spoonbill Platalea alba...............................................................................91 4.2.13 Lesser Flamingo Phoenicopterus minor..................................................................91 4.2.14 Magpie Goose Anseranas semipalmata...................................................................92 4.2.15 Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolour.....................................................92 4.2.16 Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica.......................................................92 4.2.17 West Indian Whistling Duck Dendrocygna arborea..............................................92 4.2.18 Black-bellied Whistling Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis.......................................92 4.2.19 Black-necked Swan Cygnus melanocorypha ..........................................................92 4.2.20 Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator ......................................................................92 4.2.21 Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba...................................................................93 4.2.22 Ross’s Goose Chen rossii..........................................................................................93 4.2.23 Hawaiian Goose Branta sandvicensis......................................................................93 4.2.24 Brent Goose Branta bernicla ...................................................................................93 4.2.25 Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis.....................................................................93 4.2.26 Blue-winged Goose Cyanochen cyanoptera ............................................................93 4.2.27 Orinoco Goose Neochen jubata ...............................................................................93
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantifying Crop Damage by Grey Crowned Crane Balearica
    QUANTIFYING CROP DAMAGE BY GREY CROWNED CRANE BALEARICA REGULORUM REGULORUM AND EVALUATING CHANGES IN CRANE DISTRIBUTION IN THE NORTH EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA. By MARK HARRY VAN NIEKERK Department of the Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2010 Supervisor: Prof. Adrian Craig i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables…………………………………………………………………………iv List of figures ………………………………………………………………………...v Abstract………………………………………………………………………………vii I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Species account......................................................................................... 3 Habits and diet ........................................................................................... 5 Use of agricultural lands by cranes ............................................................ 6 Crop damage by cranes ............................................................................. 7 Evaluating changes in distribution and abundance of Grey Crowned Crane………………………………………………………..9 Objectives of the study………………………………………………………...12 II. STUDY AREA…………………………………………………………………...13 Locality .................................................................................................... 13 Climate ..................................................................................................... 15 Geology and soils ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • January 2020.Indd
    BROWN PELICAN Photo by Rob Swindell at Melbourne, Florida JANUARY 2020 Editors: Jim Jablonski, Marty Ackermann, Tammy Martin, Cathy Priebe Webmistress: Arlene Lengyel January 2020 Program Tuesday, January 7, 2020, 7 p.m. Carlisle Reservation Visitor Center Gulls 101 Chuck Slusarczyk, Jr. "I'm happy to be presenting my program Gulls 101 to the good people of Black River Audubon. Gulls are notoriously difficult to identify, but I hope to at least get you looking at them a little closer. Even though I know a bit about them, I'm far from an expert in the field and there is always more to learn. The challenge is to know the particular field marks that are most important, and familiarization with the many plumage cycles helps a lot too. No one will come out of this presentation an expert, but I hope that I can at least give you an idea what to look for. At the very least, I hope you enjoy the photos. Looking forward to seeing everyone there!” Chuck Slusarczyk is an avid member of the Ohio birding community, and his efforts to assist and educate novice birders via social media are well known, yet he is the first to admit that one never stops learning. He has presented a number of programs to Black River Audubon, always drawing a large, appreciative gathering. 2019 Wellington Area Christmas Bird Count The Wellington-area CBC will take place Saturday, December 28, 2019. Meet at the McDonald’s on Rt. 58 at 8:00 a.m. The leader is Paul Sherwood.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2
    IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2 Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group Djerba Island, Tunisia, 14th - 18th November 2018 Editors: Jocelyn Champagnon, Jelena Kralj, Luis Santiago Cano Alonso and K. S. Gopi Sundar Editors-in-Chief, Special Publications, IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group K.S. Gopi Sundar, Co-chair IUCN Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Luis Santiago Cano Alonso, Co-chair IUCN Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Invited Editors for this issue Jocelyn Champagnon, Tour du Valat, Research Institute for the Conservation of Mediterranean Wetlands, Arles, France Jelena Kralj, Institute of Ornithology, Zagreb, Croatia Expert Review Board Hichem Azafzaf, Association “les Amis des Oiseaux » (AAO/BirdLife Tunisia), Tunisia Petra de Goeij, Royal NIOZ, the Netherlands Csaba Pigniczki, Kiskunság National Park Directorate, Hungary Suggested citation of this publication: Champagnon J., Kralj J., Cano Alonso, L. S. & Sundar, K. S. G. (ed.) 2019. Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group. IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2. Arles, France. ISBN 978-2-491451-00-4. Recommended Citation of a chapter: Marion L. 2019. Recent trends of the breeding population of Spoonbill in France 2012- 2018. Pp 19- 23. In: Champagnon J., Kralj J., Cano Alonso, L. S. & Sundar, K. S. G. (ed.) Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group. IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2. Arles, France. INFORMATION AND WRITING DISCLAIMER The information and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Aythya ferina (Common Pochard) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 6 Sources of reported national population data p. 9 Species factsheet bibliography p. 17 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Aythya ferina (Common Pochard) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Geese in Captivity by Bob Elgas Big Timber, Montana
    Wild Geese in Captivity by Bob Elgas Big Timber, Montana Man has always been fascinated by, Wild geese were frequently depicted exists, and wild geese have become and has had a close association with, on ancient structures. Indeed, the increasingly popular with avicul­ wild geese. As a result of their ten- Swan goose of China, and the Greylag turists. dency to vocalize an objection to of Europe were domesticated eons Throughout the world there are nocturnal disturbances, the early ago, long before the dawn of written some 15 species of wild geese, with Romans utilized them as watchdogs.. history. Even today the fascination numerous sub-species, all of which are native to the northern hemi­ sphere. Interestingly, there are no true geese in the southern hemisphere. South America is represented by a specialized group known as sheld­ geese, while Africa and Australia are represented by a number of birds with goose-like characteristics. Sheld­ geese are actually modified ducks which, through the evolutionary process, have assumed goose-like similarities. One of the more obvious differences is the dimorphism of sexes characterized by sheldgeese ­ males being of completely different plumage than females. In true geese, both sexes are alike. Although the birds from the southern hemisphere are interesting in their own right, the differences are so great that they can­ not be classified with the true geese. The geese of the northern hemi­ sphere are divided into two groups ­ the genus Anset; which is representa­ tive of the true geese, and the genus A representative ofthe genus Anser is thispair ofEmperorgeese (Anser canagicus).
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Ecology, Status and Modelling of Waterbird Populations of the Coorong South Lagoon
    Review of the ecology, status and modelling of waterbird populations of the Coorong South Lagoon Thomas A. A. Prowse Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/12 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a research alliance between the South Australian Government through the Department for Environment and Water, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia. The Institute facilitates governments, industries, and leading researchers to collaboratively identify, develop and adopt innovative solutions for complex water management challenges to ensure a sustainable future. This program is part of the Department for Environment and Water’s Healthy Coorong Healthy Basin Program, which is jointly funded by the Australian and South Australian Governments. Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research 209A Darling Building, North Terrace The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005 tel: (08) 8313 5020 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Prowse TAA (2020) Review of the ecology, status and modelling of waterbird populations of the Coorong South Lagoon. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/12. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water, The University of Adelaide. Disclaimer This report has been prepared by The University of Adelaide (as the Goyder Institute for Water Research partner organisation) and contains independent scientific/technical advice to inform government decision- making. The independent findings and recommendations of this report are subject to separate and further consideration and decision-making processes and do not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government or the South Australian Department for Environment and Water.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalmatian Pelican Identification Manual Companion Document to the “Dalmatian Pelican Monitoring Manual”
    Pelican Way of LIFE (LIFE18 NAT/NL/716) “Conservation of the Dalmatian Pelican along the Black Sea - Mediterranean Flyway” Dalmatian Pelican Identification Manual Companion document to the “Dalmatian Pelican Monitoring Manual” December 2020 Authored by: Commissioned by: Giorgos Catsadorakis and Olga Alexandrou, Society for the Protection of Prespa Rewilding Europe Dalmatian Pelican Identification Manual - Companion document to the “Dalmatian Pelican Monitoring Manual” December 2020 Authors: Giorgos Catsadorakis1 and Olga Alexandrou2 1,2Society for the Protection of Prespa, Agios Germanos, GR-53150, Prespa, Greece, [email protected] , [email protected] © Rewilding Europe Executed under the framework of “Conservation of the Dalmatian Pelican along the Black Sea - Mediterranean Flyway” (Pelican Way of LIFE; LIFE18 NAT/NL/716; https://life-pelicans.com/) project, financed by the LIFE programme of the European Union and Arcadia – a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin. Suggested citation: Society for the Protection of Prespa, 2020. Dalmatian pelican identification manual - Companion document to the “Dalmatian pelican monitoring manual”. Rewilding Europe. Produced within the framework of Pelican Way of LIFE project (LIFE18 NAT/NL/716). Keywords: Dalmatian pelican, identification, ageing, plumage, moulting patterns, sexing. Photo credits: Society for the Protection of Prespa, unless stated otherwise. Introduction Visual identification of the Dalmatian pelican seems like a straightforward task, yet in sites used by both species (the Dalmatian pelican and the great white pelican) identification can be tricky, especially when the observer is located some distance away from the birds. Hardly any useful material has been published on the sequence of moults and plumages of the Dalmatian pelican, and this gap often creates confusion and uncertainty about the accuracy of data in regards to ageing of Dalmatian pelicans, as well as frequently undermining confidence in census numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Group on Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills Newsletter
    INTERNATIONAL WATERFOWL AND WETLANDS RESEARCH BUREAU/ INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BIRD PRESERVATION/ IUCN -- THE WORLD CONSERVATION UNION SPECIALIST GROUP ON STORKS, IBISES AND SPOONBILLS NEWSLETTER Volume 5, Number 1/2 November, 1992 LETTER FROM THE CO-CHAIRS improve management of small populations of endangered species. There is a great deal of exciting activity and new involvement within SIS. In April, Koen attended Initially, Michael Soull! and others began the Waldrapp Ibis Conservation meeting in Rabat, using mathematical models to examine the vulner­ Morocco (page 8). This was a productive meeting. abilities of small, threatened populations and to The increased interest and cooperation will lead to a contribute to their management (See references more unified and effective conservation effort. We below). More recently, the IUCN/SSC Captive hope that similar cooperative efforts will be generated Breeding Specialist Group has developed one for other species. aspect of the use of models. Special (PVA) meetings are held to model individual endangered In July, Malcolm attended a workshop for the species (e.g., the recent PVA meeting on the conservation of storks and cranes in the Amur River Waldrapp Ibis in Rabat). At these meetings a Basin (page 9). The meeting was well attended by single computer model is used: Vortex which was Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans as well as written by Robert Lacy of the Brookfield Zoo. conservationists from Hong Kong and the United States. One working group dealt with the Oriental Because it is commonly used, the term White Stork Ciconia boyciana. We discussed and PVA has come to mean different things to differ­ summarized the conservation needs of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Introgression Between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose Results in a Largely Homogeneous Landscape of Genetic Differentiation
    Heredity (2020) 125:73–84 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-0322-z ARTICLE Recent introgression between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose results in a largely homogeneous landscape of genetic differentiation 1 2 3 1 Jente Ottenburghs ● Johanna Honka ● Gerard J. D. M. Müskens ● Hans Ellegren Received: 12 December 2019 / Revised: 11 May 2020 / Accepted: 12 May 2020 / Published online: 26 May 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Several studies have uncovered a highly heterogeneous landscape of genetic differentiation across the genomes of closely related species. Specifically, genetic differentiation is often concentrated in particular genomic regions (“islands of differentiation”) that might contain barrier loci contributing to reproductive isolation, whereas the rest of the genome is homogenized by introgression. Alternatively, linked selection can produce differentiation islands in allopatry without introgression. We explored the influence of introgression on the landscape of genetic differentiation in two hybridizing goose taxa: the Taiga Bean Goose (Anser fabalis) and the Tundra Bean Goose (A. serrirostris). We re-sequenced the whole 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: genomes of 18 individuals (9 of each taxon) and, using a combination of population genomic summary statistics and demographic modeling, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of these birds. Next, we quantified the impact of introgression on the build-up and maintenance of genetic differentiation. We found evidence for a scenario of allopatric divergence (about 2.5 million years ago) followed by recent secondary contact (about 60,000 years ago). Subsequent introgression events led to high levels of gene flow, mainly from the Tundra Bean Goose into the Taiga Bean Goose.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Changes in the Sex Ratio of the Common Pochard Aythya Ferina Compared to Four Other Duck Species at Martin Mere, Lancashire, UK
    140 Temporal changes in the sex ratio of the Common Pochard Aythya ferina compared to four other duck species at Martin Mere, Lancashire, UK RUSSELL T. FREW1,*, KANE BRIDES1, TOM CLARE2, LAURI MACLEAN1, DOMINIC RIGBY3, CHRISTOPHER G. TOMLINSON2 & KEVIN A. WOOD1 1Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK. 2Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Martin Mere, Fish Lane, Burscough, Lancashire L40 0TA, UK. 3Conservation Contracts Northwest Ltd. Horwich, Bolton, Lancashire BL6 7AX, UK. *Correspondence author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Duck populations tend to have male-biased adult sex ratios (ASRs). Changes in ASR reflect species demographic rates; increasingly male-biased populations are at risk of decline when the bias results from falling female survival. European and North African Common Pochard Aythya ferina numbers have declined since the 1990s and show increasing male bias, based on samples from two discrete points in time. However, lack of sex ratio (SR) data for common duck species inhibits assessing the pattern of change in the intervening period. Here, we describe changes in annual SR during winters 1991/92–2005/06 for five duck species (Common Pochard, Gadwall Mareca strepera, Northern Pintail Anas acuta, Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata and Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula) at Martin Mere, Lancashire, UK. Pochard, Pintail, Tufted Duck and Shoveler showed significantly male-biased SRs, with the male bias increasing in Pochard and Shoveler, exhibiting a weak decrease in Pintail, and with no significant trend recorded for Tufted Duck or Gadwall. The increasing male-biased Pochard SR at Martin Mere contrasts with the stable trend for Britain, suggesting that site trends may not reflect those at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia: a Taste of Africa, November 2017
    Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 A Tropical Birding “Chilled” SET DEPARTURE tour The Gambia A Taste of Africa Just Six Hours Away From The UK November 2017 TOUR LEADERS: Alan Davies and Iain Campbell Report by Alan Davies Photos by Iain Campbell Egyptian Plover. The main target for most people on the tour www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] p.1 Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 Red-throated Bee-eaters We arrived in the capital of The Gambia, Banjul, early evening just as the light was fading. Our flight in from the UK was delayed so no time for any real birding on this first day of our “Chilled Birding Tour”. Our local guide Tijan and our ground crew met us at the airport. We piled into Tijan’s well used minibus as Little Swifts and Yellow-billed Kites flew above us. A short drive took us to our lovely small boutique hotel complete with pool and lovely private gardens, we were going to enjoy staying here. Having settled in we all met up for a pre-dinner drink in the warmth of an African evening. The food was delicious, and we chatted excitedly about the birds that lay ahead on this nine- day trip to The Gambia, the first time in West Africa for all our guests. At first light we were exploring the gardens of the hotel and enjoying the warmth after leaving the chilly UK behind. Both Red-eyed and Laughing Doves were easy to see and a flash of colour announced the arrival of our first Beautiful Sunbird, this tiny gem certainly lived up to its name! A bird flew in landing in a fig tree and again our jaws dropped, a Yellow-crowned Gonolek what a beauty! Shocking red below, black above with a daffodil yellow crown, we were loving Gambian birds already.
    [Show full text]