DOCSLIB.ORG

Record of Decision (Rods)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Record of Decision (Rods) EPA/ROD/R01-98/130 1998 EPA Superfund Record of Decision: PINE STREET CANAL EPA ID: VTD980523062 OU 01 BURLINGTON, VT 09/29/1998 EPA 541-R98-130 <IMG SRC98130> DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION Pine Street Canal Superfund Site Burlington, Vermont STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This Decision Document presents the selected remedial action for the Pine Street Canal Superfund Site in Burlington, Vermont, developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. ºº 9601 et. seg. and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) as amended, 40 C.F.R. Part 300. The Regional Administrator for EPA New England has been delegated the authority to approve this Record of Decision. The Regional Administrator has redelegated this authority to the Director of the Office of Site Remediation and Restoration. The State of Vermont has concurred with the selected remedy. STATEMENT OF BASIS This decision is based on the Administrative Record which has been developed in accordance with Section 133(k) of CERCLA and is available for public review in Burlington, Vermont, at the Fletcher Free Public Library and Bailey Howe Library at the University of Vermont, and at the EPA New England Office of Site Remediation and Restoration Records Center in Boston, Massachusetts. The Administrative Record Index (Appendix D) identifies each of the items comprising the Administrative Record upon which the selection of the remedial action is based. ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from this Site, if not addressed by implementing the response action selected in this Record of Decision, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or welfare, or to the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY This Record of Decision sets forth the selected remedy for the Pine Street Canal Superfund Site. The major components of the selected remedy include: • Capping contaminated sediments in Canal and Wetland Subareas 1, 2,3,7, and 8, • Institutional controls for groundwater below the Site, • Institutional controls for land-use development, • Site boundary definition, • Long-term performance monitoring, and, • Five-year reviews. DECLARATION The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, attains federal and state requirements that are applicable or relevant and appropriate for this remedial action, and is cost-effective. This remedy does not satisfy the statutory preference for remedies that utilize treatment as a principal element to reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume of hazardous substances, however, it does reduce the mobility of the hazardous substances through containment. This remedy utilizes permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable. As this remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining on site above health-based levels and guidelines for ecological health, five-year reviews will be conducted after commencement of remedial action to ensure that the remedy continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment. <IMG SRC 98130A> ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I RECORD OF DECISION PINE STREET CANAL SUPERFUND SITE BURLINGTON, VERMONT SEPTEMBER 1998 PINE STREET CANAL SUPERFUND SITE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION..................................1 II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES..............................2 A. Land-Use History...............................................2 B. Environmental Responses........................................2 C. Enforcement History............................................4 III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION..............................................4 IV. SCOPE OF REMEDIAL RESPONSE ACTION....................................5 V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS......................................6 A. Waste/Source Areas.............................................6 B. Surface and Subsurface Soils...................................7 C. Groundwater Contamination and Migration........................8 D. Surface Water..................................................8 E. Sediments......................................................9 F. Air............................................................9 G. Ecological Resources/Wetlands..................................9 VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS...............................................11 A. Human Health Risk Assessment..................................11 B. Ecological Risk Assessment....................................17 VII. DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES...........................21 A. Statutory Requirements/Response Objectives....................21 B. Remedial Action Objective/Goals...............................22 C. Development of Technology and Process Options.................23 D. Technology and Alternative Screening..........................24 VIII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES.........................................27 IX. SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES.................35 A. Evaluation Criteria...........................................35 B. Summary of the Comparative Analysis of Alternatives...........36 X. THE SELECTED REMEDY.................................................44 A. Capping.......................................................44 B. Stormwater Inflow Management..................................46 C. Performance Monitoring........................................46 D. Site Boundary Definition......................................47 E. Institutional Controls........................................47 F. Wetlands Restoration..........................................49 G. Cost..........................................................49 XI. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS............................................49 A. The Selected Remedy is Protective of Human Health and the Environment.............................................50 B. The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs.............................50 C. The Selected Remedial Action is Cost Effective................52 D. The Selected Remedy Utilizes Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment or Resource Recovery Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable.............................53 E. The Selected Remedy Does Not Satisfy the Preference for Treatment That Permanently and Significantly reduces the Toxicity, Mobility or Volume of the of the Hazardous Substances as a Principal Element.............................54 XII. DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES................................54 XIII. STATE ROLE..........................................................54 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS REFERENCES APPENDICES A. TABLES AND FIGURES B. APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS C. STATE OF VERMONT DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE D. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX E. RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY PINE STREET CANAL SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION I. SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Pine Street Canal Superfund Site (VTD980523062) (the "Site"), is located on Pine Street in Burlington, Vermont, on the shores of Lake Champlain (Figure 1). The Site consists of an abandoned barge canal and turning basin, surrounding vegetated wetlands, and upland areas. It is hydraulically connected to Lake Champlain and is subject to flooding from the lake. The canal and turning basin constructed circa 1868, runs north-south on the western portion of the Site. Studies conducted under the direction of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) since 1988 have examined a 70- to 80-acre area (the "Study Area") which includes the properties between Lakeside Avenue to the south, Pine Street to the east, Vermont Railway property to the north, and the Vermont Railway and Lake Champlain to the west. The Site itself is defined as a much smaller 38-acre area (within the Study Area) where contaminants associated with wastes from the manufactured gas plant have been found. Figure 2 shows the Site boundaries, as defined in this Record of Decision. Currently, the majority of the Site is vacant. Surrounding land uses include industrial, commercial, and residential. It is estimated from 1990 census data that 1,450 people reside within a half-mile radius of the Site. The City of Burlington recognizes Pine Street as its major industrial corridor, and plans to encourage further economic development. The City also recognizes that the Site is a unique natural setting, and has in the past, considered rezoning the barge canal for recreation, conservation and open space. It is expected that future land use will be recreation/open space in the wetland areas along the lakefront, and commercial/industrial in the upland areas along the Pine Street corridor. The State of Vermont has reclassified the groundwater under the Site as Class IV, designating it suitable only for agricultural or commercial use, and prohibiting its use for drinking water purposes. Municipal sources supply potable water for all businesses and residences in the City. Several industrial facilities near the Site have deep bedrock wells that supply process water. Wetlands comprise approximately 21 acres of the Site and support a diversity of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians. The wetland community types present on the Site are palustrine emergent wetland, palustrine open water, palustrine forested wetland, and palustrine scrub-shrub wetland. The wetlands and canal receive stormwater runoff from the Site and from three storm sewer culverts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IGCC Cover Layout
    IGCC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation IGCC NEWSWired...an annual review 2000 And the Winner Is..! Contents Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation From the Steering Committee Chair 2 From the Director 3 From Development & External Affairs 4 What Is IGCC? 5 Research Initiatives 7 Innovations in International Cooperation 9 International Security Policy 17 International Dimensions of Domestic Conflict 23 and Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy International Environmental Policy 29 Regional Relations 35 Campus Programs 41 Administration 49 Dissemination 50 Management 58 Awards and Announcements See Inside Back Cover 1 From the Steering Committee Chair UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation THE END OF THE COLD WAR and vations in our own process of award-giving. the continuing twists and turns Hoping to generate even more synergy in the of globalization have brought system, we have discussed the creation of a fund new vitality to the mission of that will be specially targeted to support multi- the Institute on Global Conflict campus initiatives; along the same lines, we have and Cooperation (IGCC). set aside monies to support speaker programs National security concerns that include more than one campus. We have remain a central and important also sought to give campus programs more focus for research, but a fuller resources and more latitude in their activities conception of security and a and similarly added flexibility in the faculty Manuel PASTOR Jr. willingness to broaden the definition of inter- research grants (including the ability to use national issues has marked IGCC’s allocation of funds for course release, extra funding for those Photo: Bruce Cook research and teaching monies over the past who wish to develop teaching materials from several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Against the Political Winds
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Government and International Relations Honors Government and International Relations Papers Department April 2006 Running Against the Political Winds: How Gubernatorial Campaign Strategies Contribute to Mixed Partisan Outcomes in Simultaneous Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections Christopher J. Devine Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp Recommended Citation Devine, Christopher J., "Running Against the Political Winds: How Gubernatorial Campaign Strategies Contribute to Mixed Partisan Outcomes in Simultaneous Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections" (2006). Government and International Relations Honors Papers. 3. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp/3 This Honors Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Government and International Relations Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government and International Relations Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. Running Against the Political Winds How Gubernatorial Campaign Strategies Contribute to Mixed Partisan Outcomes in Simultaneous Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections An Honors Thesis Presented By Christopher Devine To the Department of Government In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors
    [Show full text]
  • A Story of Courage, Compassion and Community
    COTS 25TH ANNIVERSARy 1982–2007 A story of courage, compassion and community Several COTS founders gathered in October 2007 to recall the early years and help put pieces into place for the story of COTS told on these pages. Seated: Sister Lucille Bonvouloir and Gary Eley. Standing, from left: Charlie Biss, Jim Rader, Mike Cunningham, Gretchen Bailey, Bob Kiss and Mike McNamara. HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo, Message from Rita Markley, Executive Director in a visit to Burlington in August, 1998, presented COTS with a Blue Ribbon Best Practice AWARDS As we mark this 25th anniversary, we are more Award for the agency’s work in helping homeless families and compelled than ever to remember how improbable individuals move out of home- it would have seemed back in 1982 that COTS lessness and into self-sufficiency. MAXWELL AWARD FOR would reach this milestone today. Back then, With Rita Markley, COTS Executive EXCELLENCE From the Fannie Mae Foundation homelessness was still so unexpected, so rare Director, are (from left) Senator Patrick Leahy, Secretary Cuomo, Awarded 1992 for developing St. John’s Hall in our community that nobody anticipated an Representative Bernie Sanders ongoing shelter operation beyond that first winter. and Mayor Peter Clavelle. BEst PRactICE AWARD: BLUE RIbboN As the housing market tightened over the years From the U.S. Department of Housing and the economy shifted, the number of people and Urban Development turning to COTS surged well beyond what any of our founders could have Awarded in 1998 for its innovative imagined. With each new challenge, this organization responded with approach to ending homelessness thrifty pluck, creating innovative strategies to address the growing needs through an agency partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Public Comments
    APPENDICES APPENDIX E PUBLIC COMMENTS Burlington International Airport 14 CFR Part 150 Update Noise Compatibility Program Update 12/2/2019 F-35 Basing at BTV is deceptive, flawed, intolerable and dangerous - Google Groups Google Groups F-35 Basing at BTV is deceptive, flawed, intolerable and dangerous Daniel Albert <[email protected]> Nov 24, 2019 9:30 PM Posted in group: BTVsound 1. I live just outside the target noise zone identified by the project's map. So, according to the map and the mitigation formula being proposed -- shoved down our throats -- we are not entitled to sound insulation, sale support, or any other form of relief. Yet when the F-35s fly, our conversations must stop because we can't hear each other above the incredibly intrusive noise. And that is with our windows closed and locked. We don't want to move but our quiet enjoyment of our premises is being directly compromised. 2. Our property values are being depleted, a taking without just compensation. We don't want to be displaced but our quiet enjoyment is being directly compromised. 3. As borne out by peer-reviewed research, the noise level of the F-35s is dangerous to children's hearing and brain development. 4. The definition of an accident is something unplanned, unexpected, that nevertheless occurs. The basing of the F-35s in a metropolitan area, as Burlington is defined under US census standards, amounts to an accident waiting to happen. Witness the fatal aircraft accidents and other fatal accidents involving large complex systems that pepper our recent history.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 City Government
    2 C ITY OF BURLINGTON,VERMONT City Organizational Chart THE VOTERS WARD CLERKS & SCHOOL INSPECTORS OF COMMISSIONERS✹ ELECTION✹ MAYOR✣ CITY COUNCIL✹ AUTHORITY TO: AUTHORITY TO: • carry out laws and ordinances • set City Policy with Mayor • appoint department heads • pass Legislation through passage of • assure performance of jobs by ordinances subject to Mayor’s veto* subordinate officers • pass resolutions with Mayor* • recommend measures • approve Mayor’s budget • act as Chief Peace Officer • approve supplementary • prepare annual budget interbudgetary transfers • act as Chairman of Board • with Mayor, set annual tax rate of Finance • establish rules for conduct of City Council meetings CITY OFFICERS KEY & DEPARTMENT COMMISSIONERS✦ ✣ Elected at large HEADS ✜ (for list, see page 13) ✹ (for list, see page 6) Elected at large by ward ✜ Appointed by the Mayor subject to the approval of City Council ✦ Appointed by the City Council or City Council SUPERINTENDENT▲ BOARD OF FINANCE▼ with Mayor presiding AUTHORITY TO: ▲ Appointed by the Board • act as trustees of public money of School Commissioners • establish accounting system * Ordinances relate to • provide monthly reports and external matters while Resolutions relate to annual audit internal matters PRINCIPALS • select official depository ▼ Mayor, Chief • authorize budget line item Administrative Officer, changes President of City • be responsible for care and Council, and two control of public buildings Councilors elected by the City Council A NNUAL F INANCIAL R EPORT 2006 3 Mayor’s Message he end of Fiscal Year 2006 marked mum housing code inspections and investi- approximately three months into my gating zoning violations. Tfirst term as Mayor of Burlington. My •Burlington continued to be a good place to experience during that short period added to do business.
    [Show full text]
  • The DREAM Act, DACA, and Undocumented Immigrants
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kansai University Repository Debating Immigration in Polarized America : The DREAM Act, DACA, and Undocumented Immigrants 著者 Kitagawa Otsuru Chieko journal or Kansai University review of law and politics publication title volume 36 page range 1-21 year 2015-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10112/11118 1 Debating Immigration in Polarized America: The DREAM Act, DACA, and Undocumented Immigrants Chieko KITAGAWA OTSURU＊ Introduction A newspaper article introduces us to John Lennon’s and Yoko Ono’s 1972-1975 deportation fight, which became the foundation of the discretion policy announced by President Barack Obama in 2012 (Japan Times 2014). According to the article, when challenged by Lennon and Ono’s lawyer, Leon Wildes, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) acknowledged that it had used its own discretion in non-priority cases and revealed its prosecutorial discretion guidelines. The above-mentioned discretion policy is Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) launched on June 15, 2012. It is a common application of prosecutorial discretion to adopt a lenient approach towards those who had illegally entered the United States as children accompanied by their parents and have been in the United States without any legal standing. Under DACA, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are directed by the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security not to remove them. Since this policy does not have the power to change the beneficiaries’ legal status, the young undocumented immigrants are still not eligible to apply for citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Progressive City: Third Sector Housing in Burlington By
    Building the Progressive City: Third Sector Housing in Burlington By John Emmeus Davis Two months after Ronald Reagan assumed office as the fortieth president of the United States, Bernie Sanders was elected the thirty-second mayor of Burlington, Vermont. Both men remained in office for eight years. When Reagan stepped down in 1989, his policies and programs were continued by his vice-president, who was elevated to the presidency by the same conservative coalition that had supported Reagan. Sanders stepped down in 1989 after serving four two-year terms as mayor. His policies and programs were continued by Peter Clavelle, who had served as Sanders’s director of community and economic development. Clavelle was carried into office on the shoulders of Burlington’s “Progressive Coalition,’ the same third-party movement that had supported Sanders. There is considerable irony in the fact that the decade of the “Reagan revolution” in Washington was also the decade of “Sanderista” rule in Burlington. These two political movements had little in common. Their leaders, Reagan and Sanders, shared even less. Indeed, it would have been difficult to find two elected officials anywhere in the United States during the 1980s who were further apart in background, ideology, and political agenda. The man elected president was a middle-class midwesterner of Irish descent whose entire career, first in the movies and then in politics, had been heavily bankrolled and carefully scripted by men of wealth and power. Ronald Reagan was the most conservative politician to occupy the White House in fifty years, a person whose entire political philosophy was built around the single idea that private individuals and private markets could solve nearly every problem of poverty, unemployment, and injustice if government would just stop meddling in matters that were not its proper concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Street Canal, Operable Unit
    Superfund Records Center SITE: rW '-^ »'«•<•* BREAK: •*<" ^1 Pine Street CanalOTHER; -^ NPL Site Administrative Record Index Compiled: May 18, 1992 Prepared for Region I Waste Management Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency With Assistance from AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. One Bowdom Square, 7th Floor • Boston, Massachusetts 02114 • (617) 557-2000 Pine Street Canal NPL Site Administrative Record Table of Contents Volume I 1.0 Pre-Remedial Records 1.2 Preliminary Assessment 3.0 Remedial Investigation (RI) 3.1 Correspondence 3.4 Interim Deliverables Volume II 3.4 Interim Deliverables (cont'd.) 3.5 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) 3.6 Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports Volume III 3.6 Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports (cont'd.) Volume IV 3.6 Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports (cont'd.) Volume V 3.6 Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports (cont'd.) Volume VI 3.7 Work Plans and Progress Reports 3.9 Health Assessment Volume VII 4.0 Feasibility Study (FS) 4.4 Interim Deliverables Volume VIII 4.4 Interim Deliverables (cont'd.) Pine Street Canal NPL Site Administrative Record Table of Contents (cont'd/) Volume IX 4.7 Work Plans and Progress Reports 10.0 Enforcement 10.4 Interviews, Depositions, and Affidavits 10.8 EPA Consent Decrees 10.9 Pleadings 11.0 Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) 11.9 PRP-Specific Correspondence 11.12 PRP Related Documents Volume X 11.12 PRP Related Documents (cont'd.) Volume XI 11.12 PRP Related Documents (cont'd.) 13.0 Community Relations 13.1 Correspondence 13.2 Community Relations Plans 13.3 News Clippings/Press Releases 13.5 Fact Sheets 14.0 Congressional Relations 14.1 Correspondence Administrative Record Index Introduction This document is the Index to the Preliminary Administrative Record for the future Record of Decision for the Pine Street Canal National Priorities List (NPL) site.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Annual Report:2004 Annual
    VERMONT MEDICAL SOCIETY 2004 ANNUAL REPORT James O’Brien, M.D. was sworn in as President at the October 2003 VMS Annual Meeting James O’Brien, M.D., VMS President and Paul Harrington, VMS EVP at an AMA Meeting Harvey Reich, M.D. in Washington, D.C. was sworn in as President at the October 2004 VMS Annual Meeting Left to right: Burlington Mayor Peter Clavelle and Gov. James Douglas Debate at on of the VMS sponsored debates in October 2004 VMS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONTACTING THE VMS BY PHONE 802.223.7898 or 800.640.8767 HARVEY REICH, M.D. PRESIDENT 160 ALLEN STREET BY EMAIL [email protected] RUTLAND, VT 05701 747-3851 BY FAX 802.223.1201 [email protected] PETER DALE, M.D. BY MAIL PO Box 1457, PRESIDENT-ELECT Montpelier, Vermont 05601 195 HOSPITAL LOOP, SUITE 3 BERLIN, VT 05602 223-6196 [email protected] * V M S * S TAFF* DAVID JOHNSON, M.D. VICE PRESIDENT 18 MANSION STREET WINOOSKI, VT 05404 655-3000 JAMES.O’[email protected] JOHN MAZUZAN, M.D. PAUL HARRINGTON MADELEINE MONGAN JESSA BLOCK TREASURER EXEC. VICE PRES. VP FOR POLICY POLICY SPECIALIST 366 SOUTH COVE RD. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] BURLINGTON, VT 05401 864-5039 [email protected] JAMES O’BRIEN, M.D. IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT 18 MANSION STREET WINOOSKI, VT 05404 JOY IBEY STEVE LAROSE STEPHANIE WINTERS 655-3000 BUSINESS MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS DIR. OFFICE & MEMBERSHIP JAMES.O’[email protected] 2 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Dear Member of the Vermont Medical Society: our three groups can work together to improve substance abuse treatment in the three states.
    [Show full text]
  • Instant Runoff Voting Report 2006 Mayoral
    The Vermont Legislative Research Shop Instant Runoff Voting On March 7, 2006 the city of Burlington, Vermont utilized an instant run off voting system (IRV) to select its mayor. As a result Burlington’s mayor, Bob Kiss, is currently the only executive office holder in the US to be selected by the instant runoff voting system. The purpose of this report is to present the results of an exit poll The Vermont Legislative Research Shop conducted on the March 7th election. Before discussing the election and exit poll we will examine the use of IRV in other political jurisdictions and paradoxes associated with this type of voting system. Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) is also known as Alternative Voting, Ranked Choice, Preferential Voting, or the Hare System. For the purposes of this report we will refer to the system as IRV. IRV describes an electoral process in which voters can rank choices for a political office on a ballot. If one candidate is ranked first by over 50% of the voters, that candidate wins and the election is over. If no candidate receives over 50% of the votes in the first ranking then the candidate with the lowest number of votes is eliminated. The second rankings of voters who voted for the eliminated candidate are allotted to the remaining candidates. This process continues until one candidate receives over 50% of the vote. The first use on record of IRV was the colony of Queensland, Australia in 1893. The IRV method is presently used for electing the Australian House of Representatives. The President of Ireland is currently elected using IRV, as well as the Papua New Guinea National Parliament and the Fijian House of Representatives.1 Experience with IRV in the US IRV is used by several US cities, including: San Francisco, California for its Board of Selectmen election in 2004 and Cambridge, Massachusetts for its city council elections.
    [Show full text]
  • 139Th ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 1 Year Ending June 30, 2005 • Population: 39,824
    139th ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 1 Year ending June 30, 2005 • population: 39,824 CITY GOVERNMENT REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS’ City Organizational Chart . .2 ANNUAL REPORTS Mayor’s Message . .3 Chittenden County Transportation Authority . .55 City Officials Appointed by Mayor . .6 Chittenden Solid Waste District . .57 Vermont Legislators . .7 Winooski Valley Park District . .58 Mayors of Burlington . .7 City Council . .8 MISCELLANEOUS City Council Committees . .9 Annual Town Meeting Day Results . .59 City Departments . .10 Salaries . .61 Office Hours . .10 General Obligation Debt . .84 Important Dates . .11 Appraised Valuation . .84 City Holidays 2005 . .11 Summary of Tax-Exempt Properties . .84 Board of School Commissioners . .12 Acknowledgments City Commissioners . .13 Graphic Design: Futura Design FINANCIAL REPORT . .85 Printing: Queen City Printers Regularly Scheduled This material can be made Commission Meetings . .17 available in alternate formats for persons with disabilities. DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORTS Burlington Legacy Project Action Plan .18 Airport, Burlington International . .20 Arts, Burlington City . .21 Assessor’s Office . .23 Attorney, Office of the City . .24 Church Street Marketplace . .26 Clerk & Treasurer, Office of the City . .27 Code Enforcement . .29 Community and Economic Development Office . .30 Electric Department . .34 Fire Department . .36 Housing Authority . .38 Human Resources Department . .39 Fletcher Free Library . .40 Parks and Recreation Department . .43 Planning and Zoning Department . .46 Police Department .
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Documentation Attached
    i 10 1^1?, '>-C <­ Superfund Records Center il SDMS DocID 463863 J ,;YT1L: y^W •^W:r-f- HREAK:,, t(/( OTHER: ^^ 9'&^P May 15, 1993 Slieila Eckman and Ross Gilleland Remedial Project Managers US EPA Region 1 JFK Building (HPS-CANl) Boston, Massachusetts 02203 : i .Siiuni ••.Viiiiiim.s .Sirjc; ".iriiiviuin. V.jrn'.iMU 'jr-^Ol-riJiHl Dear Sheila and Ross, •.^!)2l fi.>>;-Ul-i Enclosed are copies of the Lake Champlain Melissa VV. Davis Committee's comments on the EPA's proposed remediation New York Cliuir plan, our technical advisor's report on the plan and preliminary suggestions for the Public and. Scientific vVilliam F. Romond Vermont Cliair Review Committees on the Pine Street Barge Canal Superfund Site. Claire L. Bamett New York Vice Cluiir I look forward to speaking and meeting with both of you soon to develop more of the details for the \ Leslie A. King Vermont Vice Chair review committees. As discussed with Ross, LCC sees the convening of this group as an enhancement to the Peter S. Paine, Jr. existing outreach effort EPA has put in place. We General Counsel feel that implementing such an approach is absolutely necessary to moving us efficiently to a solution that William G. Howland Treasurer has public and scientific acceptance. I know that both of you have a strong desire to resolve this issue Lori M. Fisher in an equitable manner and I hope we can work together Eixecmive Direcior/Secreiary towards that end. Jri Fisher Executive Director Enclosures Printed vn Recvcled Non-Chionne Bleached Paper %g .^s^ May 15, 1993 Mr.
    [Show full text]