Instant Runoff Voting Report 2006 Mayoral
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship
INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE FOR THE PARLIAMENT INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY ISSN 1328-7478 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2003 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship Sarah Miskin Politics and Public Administration Group 24 March 2003 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Martin Lumb and Janet Wilson for their help with the research into party defections in Australia and Cathy Madden, Scott Bennett, David Farrell and Ben Miskin for reading and commenting on early drafts. -
Queen's Or Prince's Consent
QUEEN’S OR PRINCE’S CONSENT This pamphlet is intended for members of the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel. Unless otherwise stated: • references to Erskine May are to the 24th edition (2011), • references to the Companion to the Standing Orders are to the Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to Proceedings of the House of Lords (25th edition, 2017), • references to the Cabinet Office Guide to Making Legislation are to the version of July 2017. Office of the Parliamentary Counsel September 2018 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2 QUEEN’S CONSENT Introduction. 2 The prerogative. 2 Hereditary revenues, the Duchies and personal property and interests . 4 Exceptions and examples . 6 CHAPTER 3 PRINCE’S CONSENT Introduction. 7 The Duchy of Cornwall . 7 The Prince and Steward of Scotland . 8 Prince’s consent in other circumstances . 8 Exceptions and examples . 8 CHAPTER 4 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The remoteness/de minimis tests . 10 Original consent sufficient for later provisions . 10 No adverse effect on the Crown. 11 CHAPTER 5 THE SIGNIFICATION OF CONSENT Signification following amendments to a bill. 13 Re-signification for identical bill . 14 The manner of signification . 14 The form of signification . 15 CHAPTER 6 PRACTICAL STEPS Obtaining consent. 17 Informing the Whips . 17 Writing to the House authorities . 17 Private Members’ Bills. 17 Informing the Palace of further developments . 18 Other. 18 CHAPTER 7 MISCELLANEOUS Draft bills . 19 Consent not obtained . 19 Inadvertent failure to signify consent . 19 Consent in the absence of the Queen. 20 Consent before introduction of a bill . 20 Queen’s speech . 20 Royal Assent . -
Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President
Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 This report was researched and writen during the 2019-2020 academic year by students in Fordham Law School’s Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic, where students developed non-partsan recommendatons to strengthen the naton’s insttutons and its democracy. The clinic was supervised by Professor and Dean Emeritus John D. Feerick and Visitng Clinical Professor John Rogan. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the individuals who generously took tme to share their general views and knowledge with us: Robert Bauer, Esq., Professor Monika McDermot, Thomas J. Schwarz, Esq., Representatve Thomas Suozzi, and Jesse Wegman, Esq. This report greatly benefted from Gail McDonald’s research guidance and Flora Donovan’s editng assistance. Judith Rew and Robert Yasharian designed the report. Table of Contents Executve Summary .....................................................................................................................................1 Introducton .....................................................................................................................................................4 -
Australia's System of Government
61 Australia’s system of government Australia is a federation, a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy. This means that Australia: Has a Queen, who resides in the United Kingdom and is represented in Australia by a Governor-General. Is governed by a ministry headed by the Prime Minister. Has a two-chamber Commonwealth Parliament to make laws. A government, led by the Prime Minister, which must have a majority of seats in the House of Representatives. Has eight State and Territory Parliaments. This model of government is often referred to as the Westminster System, because it derives from the United Kingdom parliament at Westminster. A Federation of States Australia is a federation of six states, each of which was until 1901 a separate British colony. The states – New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania - each have their own governments, which in most respects are very similar to those of the federal government. Each state has a Governor, with a Premier as head of government. Each state also has a two-chambered Parliament, except Queensland which has had only one chamber since 1921. There are also two self-governing territories: the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. The federal government has no power to override the decisions of state governments except in accordance with the federal Constitution, but it can and does exercise that power over territories. A Constitutional Monarchy Australia is an independent nation, but it shares a monarchy with the United Kingdom and many other countries, including Canada and New Zealand. The Queen is the head of the Commonwealth of Australia, but with her powers delegated to the Governor-General by the Constitution. -
Reference of Bills to Australian Senate Committees
Papers on Parliament No. 43, June 2005 Reference of Bills to Australian Senate Committees With particular reference to the role of the Selection of Bills Committee JOHN VANDER WYK and ANGIE LILLEY John Vander Wyk is Clerk Assistant (Committees) in the Department of the Senate, and was previously Clerk Assistant (Table). In the latter position he was secretary to the Selection of Bills Committee. Research support and appendices by Angie Lilley Programming Officer in the Senate Table Office DEPARTMENT OF THE SENATE Published and printed by the Department of the Senate, 2005 Papers on Parliament is edited and managed by the Research Section, Department of the Senate. Edited by Kay Walsh All inquiries should be made to: Assistant Director of Research Procedure Office Department of the Senate Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Telephone: (02) 6277 3164 ISSN 1031–976X ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Some Preliminary Considerations 2 3 An Historical Perspective 4 Standing order 196A (1934) 5 Legislative and general purpose standing committees (1970) 5 Sessional order (1978) 6 Informal reviews (1982 and 1984) 7 Select Committee on Legislation Procedures (1988) 8 4 The Selection of Bills Committee 11 Establishment of the committee (1990) 11 Operations 15 Formative years 17 Meeting times for committees to consider bills 21 Committees to which bills referred 23 Stages for the reference of a bill 23 Reporting dates 26 5 Consideration of Bills by Standing and Select Committees 31 Minority/dissenting reports 32 Recommendations 32 Types of amendments -
Lights on Afterschool 2007 Local Events a Representative Sample
Lights On Afterschool 2007 Local Events A Representative Sample Alabama Birmingham, Alabama: Gail Smith, Community Education South, 205-599-8719, [email protected] Community Education South is hosting a Lights On Afterschool celebration at Avondale Elementary and Glen Iris Elementary from 3:30-6:00 PM on October 19th. Events at the different locations will showcase wellness programs, offer free glucose and blood pressure testing, and demonstrate physical education activities that involve students and parents. City Council members and School Board members may attend. Program participants, families, school staff, and community members are also invited, and more than 200 people are expected. Birmingham, Alabama: Beth McCandless, Greystone YMCA, 205-981-0144, [email protected] On October 18th from 4:30-6:30 PM, the Greystone YMCA will host an open house for Lights On Afterschool. At the event, afterschool instructors will work with students to paint a mural, and afterschool providers will give parents program information. Mobile, Alabama: Mary Cole, Hearin Chandler Family YMCA, 251-344-4856, [email protected] The Hearin Chandler Family YMCA Afterschool site will celebrate Lights On Afterschool on October 18th from 4:00-6:00 PM. Mayor Samuel Jones may speak about afterschool programs, along with School Board members. Children will decorate the facility with their artwork, and share what they learn in and enjoy about afterschool. The event is open to the community and approximately 100 people are expected. Montgomery, Alabama: Charlie Gibbons, Maxwell AFB Youth Center, [email protected] On October 18th from 3:00-5:30 PM, the Maxwell Air Force Base Youth Center will host a carnival in celebration of Lights On Afterschool. -
Roles of the Crown and Houses of the Victorian Parliament in Law‑Making Student Learning Activity
VCE LEGAL STUDIES UNIT 4: THE PEOPLE AND THE LAW — AREA OF STUDY 1, OUTCOME 1 ROLES OF THE CROWN AND HOUSES OF THE VICTORIAN PARLIAMENT IN LAW-MAKING STUDENT LEARNING ACTIVITY Overview The study of Australia’s laws and legal system involves an understanding of institutions that make our laws. Parliament is the supreme law-making body and its main function of the parliament is to make laws for and on behalf of the community. In this lesson you will look at the roles of the Crown and Houses of Parliament on Victoria in law-making. After completing this lesson plan, you will be able to • Define and use the correct legal terminology, principles and information relating to parliamentary procedure • Understand the role of the Crown in law-making • Understand the roles of the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council • Be more engaged with the Parliament of Victoria. Roles of the houses of parliament in Victoria in law making One of the important roles of parliament is to makes new laws and update old laws for the good government of our society. Victoria has a bi-cameral parliament and there are two houses, an upper house and Bi-cameral means having a lower house. The Victorian Parliament is made up of the two Houses of Parliament. • Legislative Assembly (lower house), with 88 members who each represent an electorate. • Legislative Council (upper house), with 40 members from eight regions. Each Members of Parliament region has five members. can belong to a political party or be independent. • The Crown, represented by the Governor. -
Queen's Or Prince's Consent
QUEEN’S OR PRINCE’S CONSENT This pamphlet is intended for members of the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel. Unless otherwise stated: • references to Erskine May are to the 24th edition (2011), and • references to the Companion to the Standing Orders are to the Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to Proceedings of the House of Lords (23rd edition, 2013). Office of the Parliamentary Counsel October 2013 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2 QUEEN’S CONSENT Introduction. 2 The prerogative. 2 . 4 Hereditary revenues, the Duchy of Lancaster and the Duchy of Cornwall, personal property and personal interests . 4 Exceptions and examples . 6 CHAPTER 3 PRINCE’S CONSENT Introduction. 7 The Duchy of Cornwall . 7 The Prince and Steward of Scotland . 8 Prince’s consent in other circumstances . 8 Exceptions and examples . 8 CHAPTER 4 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The remoteness/de minimis tests . 9 Original consent sufficient for later provisions . 9 No adverse effect on the Crown. 10 CHAPTER 5 THE SIGNIFICATION OF CONSENT Signification at second or third reading . 11 Signification following amendments to a bill. 12 Signification at other stages. 13 Re-signification for identical bill . 13 The manner of signification . 13 The form of signification . 13 CHAPTER 6 PRACTICAL STEPS Obtaining consent. 15 Informing the Whips . 15 Writing to the House authorities . 15 Informing the Palace of further developments . 15 Other. 15 CHAPTER 7 MISCELLANEOUS Draft bills . 16 Consent not obtained . 16 Inadvertent failure to signify consent . 16 Consent in the absence of the Queen. 17 Consent before introduction of a bill . 17 Queen’s speech . 17 Royal Assent . -
Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees Into Line with Best Practice
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE FITTING THE BILL BRINGING COMMONS LEGISLATION COMMITTEES INTO LINE WITH BEST PRACTICE MEG RUSSELL, BOB MORRIS AND PHIL LARKIN Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons legislation committees into line with best practice Meg Russell, Bob Morris and Phil Larkin Constitution Unit June 2013 ISBN: 978-1-903903-64-3 Published by The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy UCL (University College London) 29/30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ ©The Constitution Unit, UCL 2013 This report is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published June 2013 2 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 Part I: The current system .................................................................................................... 9 The Westminster legislative process in -
Running Against the Political Winds
Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Government and International Relations Honors Government and International Relations Papers Department April 2006 Running Against the Political Winds: How Gubernatorial Campaign Strategies Contribute to Mixed Partisan Outcomes in Simultaneous Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections Christopher J. Devine Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp Recommended Citation Devine, Christopher J., "Running Against the Political Winds: How Gubernatorial Campaign Strategies Contribute to Mixed Partisan Outcomes in Simultaneous Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections" (2006). Government and International Relations Honors Papers. 3. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp/3 This Honors Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Government and International Relations Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government and International Relations Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. Running Against the Political Winds How Gubernatorial Campaign Strategies Contribute to Mixed Partisan Outcomes in Simultaneous Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections An Honors Thesis Presented By Christopher Devine To the Department of Government In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors -
Alumni Mayors
September 2015 THE MAYORS’ INSTITUTE ON CITY DESIGN Alumni Mayors ALABAMA ARKANSAS Bessemer Quitman Mitchell Midwest 1997 El Dorado Mike Dumas South 1991 Birmingham Richard Arrington South 1990 Fayetteville Fred Hanna, Jr. South 1995 Birmingham Bernard Kincaid MICD 29 2001 Fayetteville Dan Coody South 2002 Birmingham William Bell, Sr. South 2012 Fayetteville Lioneld Jordan South 2010 Decatur Don Stanford South 2010 Hot Springs Helen Selig Midwest 1997 Huntsville Steve Hettinger MICD 11 1991 Jonesboro Hubert Brodell South 1994 Huntsville Thomas Battle, Jr. South 2012 Little Rock Lottie Shackelford MICD 4 1988 Mobile Michael Dow MICD 9 1990 Little Rock Jim Dailey MICD 22 1997 Mobile Sandy Stimpson MICD 58 2014 Little Rock Mark Stodola MICD 39 2007 Prattville Jim Byard, Jr. South 2002 North Little Rock Patrick Henry Hays South 1995 Tuscaloosa Walter Maddox South 2012 Pine Bluff Carl Redus, Jr. South 2010 Texarkana Danny Gray West 2002 ALASKA West Memphis Keith Ingram South 1990 Anchorage Tom Fink MICD 15 1993 Anchorage Rick Mystrom MICD 20 1996 CALIFORNIA Anchorage Mark Begich MICD 33 2004 Alameda Ralph Appezzato MICD 30 2001 Anchorage Dan Sullivan MICD 51 2011 Anaheim Tom Daly MICD 18 1995 Anchorage Ethan Berkowitz MICD 63 2015 Anaheim Curt Pringle MICD 33 2004 Fairbanks John Eberhart MICD 59 2014 Anaheim Tom Tait MICD 55 2013 Azusa Cristina Madrid West 2002 ARIZONA Berkeley Shirley Dean MICD 21 1996 Avondale Marie Lopez-Rogers West 2010 Berkeley Tom Bates MICD 33 2004 Buckeye Jackie Meck West 2013 Beverly Hills Meralee Goldman Alumni Institute -
A Story of Courage, Compassion and Community
COTS 25TH ANNIVERSARy 1982–2007 A story of courage, compassion and community Several COTS founders gathered in October 2007 to recall the early years and help put pieces into place for the story of COTS told on these pages. Seated: Sister Lucille Bonvouloir and Gary Eley. Standing, from left: Charlie Biss, Jim Rader, Mike Cunningham, Gretchen Bailey, Bob Kiss and Mike McNamara. HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo, Message from Rita Markley, Executive Director in a visit to Burlington in August, 1998, presented COTS with a Blue Ribbon Best Practice AWARDS As we mark this 25th anniversary, we are more Award for the agency’s work in helping homeless families and compelled than ever to remember how improbable individuals move out of home- it would have seemed back in 1982 that COTS lessness and into self-sufficiency. MAXWELL AWARD FOR would reach this milestone today. Back then, With Rita Markley, COTS Executive EXCELLENCE From the Fannie Mae Foundation homelessness was still so unexpected, so rare Director, are (from left) Senator Patrick Leahy, Secretary Cuomo, Awarded 1992 for developing St. John’s Hall in our community that nobody anticipated an Representative Bernie Sanders ongoing shelter operation beyond that first winter. and Mayor Peter Clavelle. BEst PRactICE AWARD: BLUE RIbboN As the housing market tightened over the years From the U.S. Department of Housing and the economy shifted, the number of people and Urban Development turning to COTS surged well beyond what any of our founders could have Awarded in 1998 for its innovative imagined. With each new challenge, this organization responded with approach to ending homelessness thrifty pluck, creating innovative strategies to address the growing needs through an agency partnership.