DOCSLIB.ORG

The City's Tunnel Vision by Albert Southwick

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The City's Tunnel Vision by Albert Southwick Worcester Telegram & Gazette Thursday, June 25, 2015 Southwick: The city's tunnel vision By Albert Southwick Posted Jun. 25, 2015 at 6:50 AM The big bash that Preservation Worcester hosted in May in the Lincoln Square Tunnel showed what imagination can achieve. Hundreds disported themselves in the gaily bedecked tunnel, which had been transformed to a combination art gallery and dance hall. All sorts of possibilities were opened up. The old tunnel, now only lightly used for traffic, suddenly became a cultural asset worth thinking about. Some perhaps were reminded of similar transformations in other places, such as the Old Vic Tunnels in London. In 2009 an empty space under Waterloo Station was transformed into an underground venue for the arts, and, for the next three or four years, featured all sorts of exhibits and entertainments. Some productions of the Old Vic, and many stage and musical shows were presented there. In 2011 British Prime Minister David Cameron presented the Old Vic Tunnels with the Big Society Award. He praised it as “an incredibly exciting project, bringing together young people from diverse backgrounds and offering them the chance to be part of such a creative and engaging venture at the heart of their community.” Kevin Spacey received the award with appropriate comments, noting that the Old Vic had put “a great deal of energy” into the project to help young artists and new ideas. A similar story could be told about the Kunst im Tunnel project in Duesseldorf, Germany, where, in a few weeks an experimental production of R.U.R., Karel Capek’s 1920 play, will be performed in an unused section of the old underground train station. Our Ernest Johnson Tunnel may not be destined for such impressive goals, but it may play a part in the city’s lively arts and entertainment scene. Which would be an unexpected development far removed from the original purpose. The tunnel has an interesting history, going back 60 years and more to when Lincoln Square was a bottleneck of epic proportions. Imagine Kelley Square with a railroad running through it. A railroad where trains once or twice a day blocked all other traffic for a half hour or so. That was Lincoln Square before 1950. It was a traffic nightmare. Cars and trucks poured into it haphazardly from six different streets. To cross it from Highland to Belmont streets, or from Main to Lincoln streets took steady nerves. On one corner of the square stood a railroad station with signals that halted traffic daily, east, west, south and north when the freight train made its leisurely crossing, usually at five o'clock. Many plans and proposals were made, including an elevated bridge connecting Highland and Belmont streets. Finally, in desperation, the City Council called in Ole Singstad for suggestions. Singstad, of Norway was the world master of tunnels. He had designed them all over Europe and America. Some of them were the Holland Tunnel in New York, the first two lanes of the Lincoln Tunnel, the Callahan Tunnel in Boston, and others in Florida, West Virginia and Louisiana. Lincoln Square was duck soup for Ole Singstad. In his lilting Norwegian brogue he told a fascinated City Council just how it could be done – a tunnel for the railroad under Belmont Street, demolition of some old buildings, a tunnel for northbound traffic from Main Street to Lincoln and Grove streets, an underpass under Belmont Street to connect Summer Street to Lincoln Street, and a big traffic circle to handle vehicles from all directions. The city councilors, awed by the legend before them, adopted the plan without a dissenting vote. It was built and served for the next 30 years. The pesky traffic jams at Lincoln Square were greatly eased. In the 1980s a new configuration was put in place, partly to accommodate the new Worcester Center Boulevard and other construction projects. The rotary was discontinued and the traffic in the tunnel was reversed, now running from north to south. An intersection a hundred yards east accommodates traffic headed for Lincoln Street. But the current plan still owes much to the genius of Ole Singstad. Thanks to him, the railroad has been banished from the square. And the other tunnel, even with reversed traffic, still keeps hundreds of vehicles out of the square every day. If you sometimes get frustrated when crossing the square, try to remember how things were in the days before Ole Singstad worked his magic. And now, as we have seen, one of his tunnels also offers a venue for artistic and entertainment talent, and who knows what else. I wonder what Ole Singstad would think of that. Albert B. Southwick's column appears regularly in the Telegram & Gazette. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transit • Airlines Transit • Airlines
    Transit • Airlines Transit • Airlines Airline Phone JFK EWR LGA Airline Phone JFK EWR LGA Airline Phone JFK EWR LGA Airline Phone JFK EWR LGA Aer Lingus 800-474-7424 n BWIA 800-538-2942 n Icelandair 800-223-5500 n SAS 800-221-2350 n Aeroflot 800-340-6400 n Cathay Pacific 800-233-2742 n n Israir 877-477-2471 n Saudi Arabian Airlines 800-472-8342 n Aerolineas Argentinas 800-333-0276 n Chautauqua 800-428-4322 n n Japan Airlines 800-525-3663 n Silverjet 877-359-7458 n Aeromexico 800-237-6639 n China Airlines 800-227-5118 n Jet Blue 800-538-2583 n n n SN Brussels 516-622-2248 n Aerosvit Ukranian 212-661-1620 n China Eastern 866-588-0825 n KLM 800-374-7747 n n South African Airways 800-722-9675 n n n Air Canada 888-247-2262 n n n Colgan 800-428-4322 n Korean Air 800-438-5000 n Spirit 800-772-7117 n Air China 800-982-8802 n Comair 800-354-9822 n n n Kuwait Airways 800-458-9248 n Sun Country 800-359-6786 n Air France 800-237-2747 n n Constellation 866-484-2299 n Lacsa 800-225-2272 n Swiss Airlines 877-359-7947 n n Air India 212-751-6200 n n Continental (domestic) 800-523-3273 n n n Lan Chile 800-735-5526 n TACA 800-535-8780 n Air Jamaica 800-523-5585 n n Continental (international) 800-231-0856 n Lan Ecuador 866-526-3279 n TAM 888-235-9826 n Air Plus Comet 877-999-7587 n n Copa Airlines 800-359-2672 n Lan Peru 800-735-5590 n Tap Air Portugal 800-221-7370 n Air Tahiti Nui 866-835-9286 n Corsair (seasonal) 800-677-0720 n LOT Polish 212-852-0240 n n Thai Airways 800-426-5204 n Air Tran 800-247-8726 n n Czech Airlines 800-223-2365 n n LTU 866-266-5588
    [Show full text]
  • Holland Tunnel Other Name/Site Number
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Fonn 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Fonn (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 HOLLAND TUNNEL Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Fonn 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Holland Tunnel Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Connecting Lower Manhattan and Jersey City. Running Under the Hudson River City/Town:Vicinity: New York City & Jersey City State: NY & NJ County: NY & Hudson Code: 061 & 017 Zip Code: 07310 & 10013 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private:__ Building(s):__ Public-local:__ District:__ Public-State: X Site:__ Public-Federal:__ Structure; X Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ____ ____ buildings ____ ____ sites 5 ____ structures ____ ____ objects 5 ____ Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: NFS Form 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 HOLLAND TUNNEL Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit‒Windsor Tunnel
    DetroitWindsor Tunnel 1 Detroit–Windsor Tunnel Detroit–Windsor Tunnel Carries 2 lanes connecting Jefferson Avenue (near I-375 and M-10) & Former Highway 3B Crosses Detroit River Locale Detroit, Michigan Windsor, Ontario Maintained by Detroit-Windsor Tunnel Company, LLC (jointly owned by City Councils of Detroit and Windsor) Total length 5160 feet (1573 m) Width 22 feet (7 m) Vertical clearance 13 feet (4 m) Opened 1930 Toll USD 4.00/CAD 4.50 (autos travelling into US) USD 4.00/CAD 4.75 (autos travelling into Canada) Daily traffic 13,000 vehicles The Detroit–Windsor Tunnel is an underwater highway tunnel connecting Detroit, Michigan in the United States, with Windsor, Ontario in Canada. It was completed in 1930. It is the second busiest crossing between the United States and Canada after the nearby Ambassador Bridge. About 13,000 vehicles (cars, vans, buses) use the tunnel each day.[1] The structure is jointly owned by the two cities. A 2004 Border Transportation Partnership study showed that 150,000 jobs in the region and $13 billion (U.S.) in annual production depend on the Windsor-Detroit international border crossing.[2] When constructed, it was only the third underwater vehicular tunnel constructed in the United States (after the Holland Tunnel between Jersey City, New Jersey, and downtown Manhattan, New York City, New York and the Posey Tube between Oakland and Alameda, California). Its creation was prompted by the opening of cross-border rail freight tunnels including the St. Clair Tunnel between Port Huron, Michigan and Sarnia, Ontario and the Michigan Central Railway Tunnel between Detroit and Windsor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Holland's Tunnel
    www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org Mr. Holland’s Table of Contents Slide/s Part Description 1N/ATitle 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~47 1 Eighth Wonder 48~86 2 All Things Considered 87~172 3 The Shield Method 173~217 4 On the Jersey Side 218~299 5 The Air Down There 300~350 6 Greatest Triumph Tunnel 1 2 Part 1 The Seven Wonders of the World Eighth Wonder 3 4 “Back in the second century B.C., a certain Antipater of Sidon com- posed an epigram in which he “…Today any similar list of wonders, no matter by whom enumerated what he termed the ‘Seven Wonders of the World.’ compiled, would doubtless include the Pyramids, not merely They were the walls of Babylon, because they alone have survived the ravages of time, but the statue at Olympia by Phidias, because they still represent a marvelous achievement of the hanging gardens at Babylon, man’s handiwork. What the other wonders would be might the Colossus of Rhodes, the afford material for a contest sponsored by some newspaper pyramids of Egypt, the maus- oleum at Halicarnassus, and the columnist.But surely there would be a place in such a list for temple at Ephesus…” the Holland Tunnel, as the longest sub-aqueous tunnel in the RE: excerpt from The Eighth Wonder world, a stupendous project, magnificently conceived and Left: caption: “The Seven Wonders executed. And surely old Antipater himself, however wedded of the Ancient World (from left to right, top to bottom): Great Pyramid he might be to his own wonders, would today be glad to add of Giza, Hanging Gardens of the Holland Tunnel to his list, as an eighth wonder of the Babylon, Temple of Artemis at world…” Ephesus, Statue of Zeus at Olympia, Mausoleum at Halicarnas- RE: excerpt from The Eighth Wonder sus, Colossus of Rhodes, and the Lighthouse of Alexandria.” 5 6 © J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • TUST Vol. 8, Nr. 2, Pp
    Chapter I: INTRODUCTION by AHMET GURSOY Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. U.S.A. PAUL C. VAN MILLIGEN Stmkton Betonbouw The Netherlands Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vo|. 8, No. 2, pp. 119-121, 1993. 0886-7798/93$6.00 + .00 Printed in Great Britain. Pergamon Press Ltd 1 19 Chapter 1: Introduction 1. IMMERSED TUBE TUNNEL TECHNOLOGY--AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 2. HISTORY OF THE WORRING GROUP 3. CONTENTS OF THE REPORT 4. ACKNOWI.EDGMENTS 120 TuN~.v.~a ~m UI~'D~GZOUNVSPACE TZC~OLOaY Volume 8, Number 2, 1993 1. Immersed Tube Tunnel Since thon, the WorkingGroup mem- herein can offer solutions for cro~ings Technology =n International bers have met ahout a d~ tJm~witifin invery deep waters. Terhni~lly speak- Perspective the past four years. In addition to ing, the floatgug t,,-n,d options wrAm. sped_',bpurpose meetings, the Gnmp ined in tK~ section offer weU-known It is with great satisfaction that we met during ITA Congress mean n and techniqu~ from off-shore constmctmn, present herewith our report on various during various speciality conferem~. as well as from immm~od tube t]lnnel aspects of ;~,-m~ed tube tunnel tech- Duringthe 1989meet~Bgin ]Mr- n~-k,~- construction. We believe that the ~me niques, based on worldwide input of ter, England, slx toplcs wore adopted for to put such construction into practice bmnel experts from the U.S.A.; from future publioatloxL Five of these topics has arrive~ various European countries, including were selected for publication for the Swedon, Norway, D~nm-~k, the United 1993 ITA meeeng in Am.terd.m It is 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jefferson Essays -- the Case for Connecting Presque Isle to Eries
    The Jefferson Essays The Case For Connecting Presque Isle to Erie’s East Side – A Historic Opportunity By Michael Fuhrman, M.S.A. Spring 2016 Essay III A Publication of The Jefferson Educational Society Executive Editor Judy Lynch, Ph.D. Technical Consultant Sean Plunkett, Weber, Murphy, Fox, Inc. Editorial Board Ferki Ferati, M.A., A.B.D. William P. Garvey, Ph.D. Ben Speggen, M.A. Pat Cuneo, B.A. The Presque Isle Connector and Erie’s Future “Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably themselves will not be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work, remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will never die, but long after we are gone be a living thing, asserting itself with ever-growing insistency.” – Daniel Hudson Burnham 2 The Case for Connecting Presque Isle to Erie’s East Side – A Historic Opportunity 3 Table Of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 4 The City of Erie’s Importance to the Entire Region ..................................... 6 Historical Efforts to Connect Erie’s East Side to Presque Isle ...................... 7 Tunnels Vs. Bridges – Today’s World View ................................................. 16 The Projected Route for the East Side Access Tunnel ................................ 20 What Would the Interior of the Tunnel Look Like?. ................................. 21 What Successful Tunnels Could Serve as Models? .................................... 21 What Changes Would Result from the Presque Isle Tunnel?. .................. 22 What Agency or Government Would Have Jurisdiction of such a Tunnel? ........................................................................................ 22 What Environmental Impacts Would a Presque Isle Tunnel Create – And How Could They Be Mitigated? ......................................................... 23 Public Safety as the Most Important Reason for the Presque Isle Connector ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Menighetsblad+3+2019.Pdf
    gdenes Menighetsblad Nr3-19 AGDENES MENIGHETSBLAD NR 3 2019 51. årgang Redaktører: Helga Hugdal Ødum Leif Veland Redaksjonskomite: Helga Hugdal Ødum Tlf. 926 27 243 Epost: [email protected] Språket er ein markør Språk er identitet. Ein skal ikkje eine steinen drar den andre etter seg, seia mange setningar før ein er det noko som heiter. Me har ein Leif Veland automatisk vert plassert geografisk tendens til å gå i flokk, som Tlf. 990 02 919 eller sosialt. Det er no slik at dess journalistar etter politikarar. Skal me Epost: [email protected] meir ein skil seg frå den ein bryta opp og visa veg, må me starta snakkar med, dess fortare vert ein med oss sjølve. plassert. Det viktigaste er no trass Tormod Selmer Nergaard alt å verta forstått, difor må ein av Innhald Tlf. 906 68 118 og til jenka seg og bruka ord som Apropos mangfald. Me tykkjer sjølv ikkje er eins eigne. Trongen etter å me har fått god variasjon på innhaldet Kirkeverge Silje Ysland ikkje skilja seg ut, konkurrerer i i bladet vårt denne gongen. Frå høg‐ Tlf. 909 83 381 høg grad med identiteten som har kyrkjeleg stoff til lokal historie. forma ein gjennom oppveksten. I Epost: [email protected] dag er det viktigare enn nokon Kyrkjelyden får i november vitjing av gong å vera som alle andre. Ung‐ biskopen som kjem på visitas. I bladet Lars Sperre dom merkar dette presset sterkare får du nærare greie på kva ein visitas Tlf. 995 99 765 enn oss som var unge ein genera‐ eigentleg er og kva som skal skje i november.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL NEWS | Summer 2005 ARTICLES DOCOMOMO NEWS UPCOMING CONFERENCES
    Bunshaft House Threatened There are buildings we simply cannot afford to lose, and the Gordon and Nina Bunshaft House in East Hampton, NY, 1961–1962, is one of them. The Town of East Hampton would commit a grave error if it did not step in immediately to forestall impending demoli- tion by its new owner Donald Maharam who recently purchased the house from Martha Stewart. Maharam claims that Stewart sold him the house in a state of disrepair and he has no choice but to demolish it. The supreme irony here is that Maharam is a member of a family whose business, Maharam Textiles, produces many products of mid-century Modern design; the company’s “Textiles of the Twentieth Century” collection features designs by contemporaries of Bunshaft such as Charles and Ray Eames, Alexander Girard, and Verner Panton. (Editor‘s Note: Panton’s work is currently on display at the AXA Gallery in New York City—see “Exhibits” section.) As recently as 2000, the Eames Office partnered with Maharam Textiles to create a line of fabrics based on the Bunshaft House, 1961-1962, designs of the Eames brothers. in its current condition. This all makes it difficult to understand why Mr. Maharam would (photo: Caroline Rob Zaleski) not restore the Bunshaft House, a masterpiece of mid-century Modernist design, and become an instant hero instead of a villain. The Nina and Gordon Bunshaft house is one of the great Modern houses in the Hamptons. It faces Georgica Pond and was designed by Gordon Bunshaft of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. The architect is well know for individual New York City landmarks such as Lever House, 1952; the Manufacturers’ Company Fifth Avenue Branch, 1954; and the Pepsi Cola Company Headquarters, 1960; as well cont’d on p.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway's Presence in New York City
    Rolf Stang, well-known actor and singer in the Norwegian-American community appearing as Norway's famous author, Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson at the annual 17th- of-May festivities in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, earlier this year. Norway’s Presence in New York City 58 SCANDINAVIAN REVIEW SCANDINAVIAN REVIEW 59 OWADAYS WHEN YOU THINK OF NORWEGIANS IN NEW Brunt Hansen, was an engineer who became head of Brooklyn’s Public Works York it’s the Bay Ridge neighborhood of Brooklyn that first and for whom Van Brunt street in Red Hook is named. Ncomes to mind. This area was certainly the center of the Scandinavian The close connection with New Amsterdam was diminished with the takeover “colony” when its population peaked through the 1930s to the 1960s. But by the English in 1674. Norwegians would only trickle in until while Bay Ridge still hosts the well-attended festivities surrounding the 17thof- May Parade, celebrating Norwegian Independence Day, the Nordics, not inclined to form lasting ghettos, have largely fled farther afield and melded into the fabric of their adopted country. A closer look at their history in New York reveals that Norwegians gathered in a succession of areas of Manhattan and Brooklyn going way back. Norway was part of Denmark until 1814 when it entered into a union with Sweden as a result of the Napoleonic wars. It gained its modern independence after a peaceful secession on 1905. New York recently celebrated the voyage of Henry Hudson in 1609. In 1619 the Danish King was also eager to join the search for the Northwest Passage that had eluded Hudson and he sent a Norwegian, Jens Munk, to America with two ships on this quest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Transportation in Philadelphia, 1946-1984
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: “LET THE PEOPLE HAVE A VICTORY”: THE POLITICS OF TRANSPORTATION IN PHILADELPHIA, 1946-1984 Jacob Kobrick, Ph.D., 2010 Directed By: Professor Robyn L. Muncy Department of History Urban transportation planning in the United States underwent important changes in the decades after World War II. In the immediate postwar period, federal highway engineers in the Bureau of Public Roads dominated the decision-making process, creating a planning regime that focused almost entirely on the building of modern expressways to relieve traffic congestion. In the 1960s, however, local opposition to expressway construction emerged in cities across the nation, reflecting growing discontent with what many citizens perceived to be a closed planning process that resulted in the destruction of urban neighborhoods, environmental degradation, and inadequate attention paid to alternative modes of transportation. Local freeway protestors found allies in the new U.S. Department of Transportation, which moved in the mid-1960s to absorb the Bureau of Public Roads and support legislation promoting a planning process more open to local input as well as a greater emphasis on federal aid for urban mass transportation. The changing culture of transportation planning produced a series of freeway revolts, resulting in the cancellation or modification of interstate highway projects, in major American cities. Changes in transportation planning played out differently in every city, however. This dissertation examines controversies over Philadelphia’s major expressway projects – the Schuylkill Expressway, the Delaware Expressway, and the never-built Crosstown Expressway, in addition to major mass transit developments such as the city’s subsidization of the commuter railroads, the creation of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, and the building of a railroad tunnel known as the Center City Commuter Connection, in order to trace the evolution of the city’s transportation politics between 1946 and 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway's Prescence in New York
    We know that Norsemen first reached North American shores around 1000 AD. But how many are aware that at least a few Norwegians walked New York streets as early as the 1600s? By Lars Nilsen Rolf Stang, well-known actor and singer in the Norwegian-American community appearing as Norway's famous author, Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson at the annual 17th- of-May festivities in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, earlier this year. BERIT HESSEN Norway’s Presence in New York City 58 SCANDINAVIAN REVIEW SCANDINAVIAN REVIEW 59 OWADAYS WHEN YOU THINK OF NORWEGIANS IN NEW York it’s the Bay Ridge neighborhood of Brooklyn that first comes Nto mind. This area was certainly the center of the Scandinavian “colony” when its population peaked through the 1930s to the 1960s. But while Bay Ridge still hosts the well-attended festivities surrounding the 17th- of-May Parade, celebrating Norwegian Independence Day, the Nordics, not inclined to form lasting ghettos, have largely fled farther afield and melded into the fabric of their adopted country. A closer look at their history in New York reveals that Norwegians gathered in a succession of areas of Manhattan and Brooklyn going way back. Norway was part of Denmark until 1814 when it entered into a union with Sweden as a result of the Napoleonic wars. It gained its modern indepen- dence after a peaceful secession on 1905. New York recently celebrated the voyage of Henry Hudson in 1609. In 1619 the Danish King was also eager to join the search for the Northwest Passage that had eluded Hudson and he sent a Norwegian, Jens Munk, to America with two ships on this quest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels
    Crossing Under the Hudson I Crossing Under the Hudson I The Story of the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels Angus Kress Gillespie rivergate books an imprint of rutgers university press new brunswick, new jersey, and london Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gillespie, Angus K., 1942– Crossing under the Hudson : the story of the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels / Angus Kress Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–0–8135–5003–9 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Holland Tunnel (New York, N.Y.) 2. Lincoln Tunnel (New York, N.Y.) I. Title. TF238.H6G55 2011 624.1Ј94097471—dc22 2010035280 A British Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the British Library. Copyright © 2011 by Angus Kress Gillespie All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, elec- tronic or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without writ- ten permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, 100 Joyce Kilmer Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 08854–8099. The only exception to this prohibition is “fair use” as defined by U.S. copyright law. Visit our Web site: http://rutgerspress.rutgers.edu Manufactured in the United States of America For All the Sandhogs—Living and Dead Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1. It Can’t Be Done: Planning for the Holland Tunnel 9 2. A Breath of Fresh Air: Building the Holland Tunnel 21 3. Winning Acceptance: Grand Opening of the Holland Tunnel 47 4. Let’s Build Another One: Construction of the Lincoln Tunnel 57 5.
    [Show full text]