DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table of Contents Table of Contents v Preface x List of Figures xiii 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Lexical Lists and Intellectual History 2 1.2 Lexical Lists: A Crash Course 6 1.2.1 Word Lists vs. Sign Lists 6 1.2.1.1 Thematic Word Lists 7 1.2.1.2 Other Types of Word Lists 8 1.2.1.3 Sign Lists 11 1.2.2 Third Millennium vs. Old Babylonian (and later) 13 1.2.3 Exercises and Reference Texts 14 1.3 History of Research 16 1.3.1 Lexical Lists as Ancient Dictionaries 16 1.3.2 Lexical Lists as Evidence for Cultural History 19 1.4 Organization of the Present Study and its Relation to DCCLT 23 2. The Archaic Lexical Corpus 27 2.1 Introduction 27 2.1.1 Archaic Writing 27 2.1.2 Conventions of Archaic Cuneiform Transliterations 30 2.2 Overview of the Archaic Lexical Corpus 32 2.2.1 The Standardized Compositions 32 2.2.1.1 Professions: Lu A 34 2.2.1.2 Vessels and Garments 37 2.2.1.3 Word Lists C 39 2.2.1.4 Metals 41 2.2.1.5 Wood 41 2.2.1.6 Cattle 42 2.2.1.7 Officials 42 2.2.1.8 Fish 43 2.2.1.9 Cities 43 2.2.1.10 Geography 44 2.2.1.11 Food (Grain; Word List D) 44 2.2.1.12 Birds 45 2.2.1.13 Plants 46 2.2.2 Non-Standardized Exercises 46 2.2.3 Formats and Find Spots 47 2.3 The Administrative Context 48 2.3.1 A Metals Account 49 2.3.2 Animals 51 2.3.3 Lexical Texts as Administrative Reference Tools? 52 2.4 Interpretations of the Archaic Corpus 53 2.4.1 Order of the World 53 2.4.2 Teaching Tools 56 2.4.3 Writing as a Social Practice 57 2.5 Conclusions 59 3. Third Millennium: All-Babylonian, Regional, and Local Traditions 60 http://d-nb.info/1062637240 vi Table of Contents 3.1 Third Millennium Lexical Texts: Provenance and Appearance 62 3.1.1 Lexical Texts: Distribution in Time and Place 62 3.1.2 Tablet Formats and Colophons 68 3.2 The All-Babylonian Lexical Tradition: Conservatism in Degrees 71 3.2.1 ED Lu A 72 3.2.2 Vessels and Garments 76 3.2.3 Word List C ("Tribute") 79 3.2.4 Metals 82 3.2.5 Wood 83 3.2.6 Cattle 85 3.2.7 Officials 86 3.2.8 Fish 88 3.2.9 Cities 91 3.2.10 Word List F 92 3.2.11 Food 93 3.2.12 Birds 96 3.2.13 Plants 98 3.2.14 Conclusions: The Archaic Texts in Early Dynastic Versions 102 3.3 Regional: ED Northern Tradition 103 3.3.1 ED LuE 105 3.3.2 Names and Professions 107 3.3.3 List of Geographical Names 108 3.3.4 ED Animals B 109 3.3.5 Practical Vocabulary A 111 3.3.6 The SamaS Myth 112 3.3.7 Northern Features 112 3.4 Regional: ED Southern Lexical Texts 116 3.4.1 Thematic Word Lists 117 3.4.2 Practical Vocabularies 119 3.4.3 Sign Lists 123 3.4.4 ED Syllabaries 126 3.4.5 Unclear and Unclassified 128 3.4.6 Southern Lists 129 3.5 Local: ED Ebla 129 3.5.1 Mesopotamian Lexical Tradition at Ebla 130 3.5.2 Local Ebla Lists 132 3.5.2.1 Ebla Sign List 133 3.5.2.2 ESbarkin, Ebla Vocabulary and the Extracts 135 3.5.3 Ebla: Conclusions 138 3.6 Old Akkadian and Ur III Periods 139 3.6.1 Old Akkadian 139 3.6.2 Ur III 140 3.7 Conclusions 142 4. A Revolution in Writing: The Old Babylonian Period 143 4.1 Old Babylonian Lexical Novelties 143 4.1.1 Sign Exercises and Name Lists 144 4.1.1.1 Syllable Alphabet A and Syllable Alphabet B 145 4.1.1.2 TuTaTi 147 4.1.1.3 Lists ofNames 148 4.1.2 Word Lists 149 4.1.2.1 Ura 149 Table of Contents vii 4.1.2.2 Ugumu "My Crown:" List of Body Parts 157 4.1.2.3 Lists of Human Beings 159 4.1.2.4 Acrographic Lists 166 4.1.2.4.1 Izi 170 4.1.2.4.2 Kagal 171 4.1.2.4.3 Nigga 174 4.1.2.4.4 Sag 175 4.1.2.5 Miscellaneous Vocabularies 175 4.1.3 Sign Lists 177 4.1.3.1 Syllabary A 177 4.1.3.2 EaandAa 178 4.1.3.3 Diri 182 4.1.4 Varia 187 4.1.4.1 Legal Phrasebooks 188 4.1.4.2 Grammatical Lists -. 194 4.1.4.2.1 Verbal Paradigms 195 4.1.4.2.2 Grammatical Vocabularies 197 4.1.4.3 God Lists 199 4.1.5 Old Babylonian Lexical Novelties: Some Conclusions 201 4.2 The Uses of Old Babylonian Lexical Lists 202 4.2.1 The Scribal Curriculum at Nippur 204 4.2.2 Scribal Curriculum: Variations and Developments 212 4.2.3 Scholarly Handbooks 215 4.2.3.1 Archaic Knowledge 216 4.2.3.2 Systematizing Knowledge 219 4.2.3.3 Speculative Philology 220 4.3 The Old Babylonian Writing Revolution 223 5. The International Period 226 5.1 Middle Babylonian Lexical Novelties 229 5.1.1 Syllabary B 230 5.1.2 Syllabary A Vocabulary 232 5.1.3 Syllabary A Paleography 233 5.1.4 Nabnitu 233 5.1.5 GrimhuS 235 5.1.6 The God List An = Anum 237 5.2. Kassite Babylonia 239 5.2.1 Lexical Texts from Kassite Babylonia: Criteria 241 5.2.1.1 Kassite Archaeological Data 241 5.2.1.2 Kassite Paleography and Orthography 242 5.2.1.3 Tablet Typology: Kassite Exercise Formats 242 5.2.1.4 Layout of Kassite Multi-Column Tablets 245 5.2.2 The Kassite Lexical Corpus 250 5.2.2.1 Kassite Thematic Lists: Ura 250 5.2.2.2 Kassite Lists of Professions: Lu2 = sa 252 5.2.2.3 Kassite Sign Lists: Syllabary B, Ea and Diri 253 5.2.2.4 Kassite God Lists 256 5.2.2.5 Kassite Acrographic Lists 258 5.2.2.6 Kassite ErimhuS and Nabnitu 259 5.2.2.7 Kassite Grammatical Lists 260 5.2.3 The Kassite Lexical Corpus: A Characterization 260 5.2.4 Uses of Kassite Lexical Texts 261 viii Table of Contents 5.3 The West 269 5.3.1 HattuSa 271 5.3.1.1 Some Examples of HattuSa Lexical Texts 272 5.3.1.2 HattuSa Lexical Texts: Formats and Distribution 276 5.3.2 Emar and Ugarit 279 5.3.2.1 Emar: Introduction 280 5.3.2.2 Syrian and Syro-Hittite Lexical Texts at Emar 283 5.3.2.3 The Syrian Lexical Corpus at Emar 285 5.3.2.4 The Syro-Hittite Lexical Corpus at Emar 286 5.3.2.5 The Lexical Texts at the Zu-Ba'la Residence 294 5.3.2.6 Ugarit 297 5.3.2.7 Other Sites: Alalakh, Nuzi, Ekalte, and Siyannu 300 5.3.3 Akhetaten (Amarna) and Canaan 302 5.4 Elam: Intellectual Tradition at Kabnak (Haft Tepe) 304 5.4.1 Scholarly Literacy at Kabnak 305 5.4.2 The Kabnak School Texts 307 5.5 Conclusions 311 6. The Kings and Scholars of Assyria 312 6.1 The Earliest Periods 313 6.2 The Middle Assyrian Period 317 6.2.1 Middle Assyrian Lexical Novelty: The Emesal Vocabulary 318 6.2.2 Sibaniba (Tell Billa) 320 6.2.3 Assur 322 6.2.3.1 The Assur Lexical Corpus: Overview 324 6.2.3.1.1 Ea: The Ea Extracts 326 6.2.3.1.2 Ki-ulutinbiSe: A Nippur Phrasebookat Assur 328 6.2.3.1.3 lira: Assyrian Dialect Forms 330 6.2.3.2 Middle Assyrian Exercise Texts 332 6.2.3.3 The Tablets of the Sons of Ninurta-uballissu 336 6.2.3.4 Babylonian Sign Forms and Paleographic Lists 341 6.2.3.5 Sumerian and Emesal in Middle Assyrian Assur 347 6.2.3.6 Conclusions: Lexical Texts in the Middle Assyrian Period 351 6.3 Lexical Texts in the Neo-Assyrian Period 353 6.3.1 Neo-Assyrian Lexical Novelties 354 6.3.1.1 Sign List: A2 = idu 355 6.3.1.2 Thematic Lists: The Practical Vocabularies 357 6.3.1.3 Other Word Lists: Igituh and Alan = Lanu 358 6.3.1.4 Akkadian Synonym Lists 360 6.3.1.5 Antagal and Group Vocabularies 361 6.3.1.6 Murgud 363 6.3.1.7 Assyrian Innovations? 366 6.3.2 Assur in the Neo-Assyrian Period 367 6.3.2.1 Lexical Exercises from Assur 369 6.3.3 Kalhu 372 6.3.4 Dur-Sarrukin 374 6.3.5 Nineveh 375 6.3.5.1 Context: Knowledge, Wisdom, Secrets 379 6.3.5.2 Uses: Scribal Education of the Crown Prince 382 6.3.5.3 Uses: Tablet Collecting 385 6.3.5.4 Uses: Interpreting Received Tradition 387 6.3.6 Huzirina 389 Table of Contents ix 6.4 Conclusions 390 7. Temples, Scholars, and Students 392 7.1 Introduction 392 7.2 The Neo- and Late Babylonian Lexical Corpus 397 7.2.1 The Lexical Corpus 397 7.2.2 Lexical Innovations 400 7.2.2.1 Lexical Commentaries 400 7.2.2.2 S" Number Syllabaries 404 7.2.2.3 Non-standardized Exercises 405 7.3 Lexical Texts as School Exercises 406 7.3.1 Elementary Level 407 7.3.2 Advanced Level 410 7.4 Scholars and Libraries of Late Babylonian Uruk 418 7.5 Conclusions 422 8.
Recommended publications
  • Hanigalbat and the Land Hani

    Hanigalbat and the Land Hani

    Arnhem (nl) 2015 – 3 Anatolia in the bronze age. © Joost Blasweiler student Leiden University - [email protected] Hanigal9bat and the land Hana. From the annals of Hattusili I we know that in his 3rd year the Hurrian enemy attacked his kingdom. Thanks to the text of Hattusili I (“ruler of Kussara and (who) reign the city of Hattusa”) we can be certain that c. 60 years after the abandonment of the city of Kanesh, Hurrian armies extensively entered the kingdom of Hatti. Remarkable is that Hattusili mentioned that it was not a king or a kingdom who had attacked, but had used an expression “the Hurrian enemy”. Which might point that formerly attacks, raids or wars with Hurrians armies were known by Hattusili king of Kussara. And therefore the threatening expression had arisen in Hittite: “the Hurrian enemy”. Translation of Gary Beckman 2008, The Ancient Near East, editor Mark W. Chavalas, 220. The cuneiform texts of the annal are bilingual: Babylonian and Nesili (Hittite). Note: 16. Babylonian text: ‘the enemy from Ḫanikalbat entered my land’. The Babylonian text of the bilingual is more specific: “the enemy of Ḫanigal9 bat”. Therefore the scholar N.B. Jankowska1 thought that apparently the Hurrian kingdom Hanigalbat had existed probably from an earlier date before the reign of Hattusili i.e. before c. 1650 BC. Normally with the term Mittani one is pointing to the mighty Hurrian kingdom of the 15th century BC 2. Ignace J. Gelb reported 3 on “the dragomans of the Habigalbatian soldiers/workers” in an Old Babylonian tablet of Amisaduqa, who was a contemporary with Hattusili I.
  • The Calendars of Ebla. Part III. Conclusion

    The Calendars of Ebla. Part III. Conclusion

    Andrews Unir~ersitySeminary Studies, Summer 1981, Vol. 19, No. 2, 115-126 Copyright 1981 by Andrews University Press. THE CALENDARS OF EBLA PART 111: CONCLUSION WILLIAM H. SHEA Andrews University In my two preceding studies of the Old and New Calendars of Ebla (see AUSS 18 [1980]: 127-137, and 19 [1981]: 59-69), interpreta- tions for the meanings of 22 out of 24 of their month names have been suggested. From these studies, it is evident that the month names of the two calendars can be analyzed quite readily from the standpoint of comparative Semitic linguistics. In other words, the calendars are truly Semitic, not Sumerian. Sumerian logograms were used for the names of two months of the Old Calendar and three months of the New Calendar, but it is most likely that the scribes at Ebla read these logograms with a Semitic equivalent. In the cases of the three logograms in the New Calendar these equiva- lents are reasonably clear, but the meanings of the names of the seventh and eighth months in the Old Calendar remain obscure. Not only do these month names lend themselves to a ready analysis on the basis of comparative Semitic linguistics, but, as we have also seen, almost all of them can be analyzed satisfactorily just by comparing them with the vocabulary of biblical Hebrew. Given some simple and well-known phonetic shifts, Hebrew cognates can be suggested for some 20 out of 24 of the month names in these two calendars. Some of the etymologies I have suggested may, of course, be wrong; but even so, the rather full spectrum of Hebrew cognates available for comparison probably would not be diminished greatly.
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST

    Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST

    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
  • The Ancient Near East Today

    The Ancient Near East Today

    Five Articles about Drugs, Medicine, & Alcohol from The Ancient Near East Today A PUBLICATION OF FRIENDS OF ASOR TABLE OF CONTENTS “An Affair of Herbal Medicine? The ‘Special’ Kitchen in the Royal Palace of 1 Ebla” By Agnese Vacca, Luca Peyronel, and Claudia Wachter-Sarkady “Potent Potables of the Past: Beer and Brewing in Mesopotamia” By Tate 2 Paulette and Michael Fisher “Joy Plants and the Earliest Toasts in the Ancient Near East” By Elisa Guerra 3 Doce “Psychedelics and the Ancient Near East” By Diana L. Stein 4 “A Toast to Our Fermented Past: Case Studies in the Experimental 5 Archaeology of Alcoholic Beverages” By Kevin M. Cullen Chapter One An Affair of Herbal Medicine? The ‘Special’ Kitchen in the Royal Palace of Ebla An Affair of Herbal Medicine? The ‘Special’ Kitchen in the Royal Palace of Ebla By Agnese Vacca, Luca Peyronel, and Claudia Wachter-Sarkady In antiquity, like today, humans needed a wide range of medicines, but until recently there has been little direct archaeological evidence for producing medicines. That evidence, however, also suggests that Near Eastern palaces may have been in the pharmaceutical business. Most of the medical treatments documented in Ancient Near Eastern cuneiform texts dating to the 3rd-1st millennium BCE consisted of herbal remedies, but correlating ancient names with plant species remains very difficult. Medical texts describe ingredients and recipes to treat specific symptoms and to produce desired effects, such as emetics, purgatives, and expectorants. Plants were cooked, dried or crushed and mixed with carriers such as water, wine, beer, honey or milk —also to make them tastier.
  • Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 2018; 5(1-2): 41–56

    Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 2018; 5(1-2): 41–56

    Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 2018; 5(1-2): 41–56 C. Jay Crisostomo* Language, Translation, and Commentary in Cuneiform Scribal Practice https://doi.org/10.1515/janeh-2018-0005 Abstract: Cuneiform scholarly practices systematized an exploration of mean- ing potential. In cuneiform scholarship, knowledge making emerged from multiplescribalpractices,mostnotablylist-making,analogicalreasoning, and translation. The present paper demonstrates how multilingualism stands atthecoreofcuneiformscholarlyinquiry, enabling hermeneutical exploration of possibility and potential. Cuneiform scholarly practices of translation and analogical hermeneutics coupled with an understanding of the cuneiform writing system constituted a system analogous to the medieval artes grammaticae. Keywords: translation, commentary, analogy, lists In a series of lectures given at the University of Cambridge, Ian Hacking asked the question “Why does language matter to philosophy?” He concludes “Language matters to philosophy because of what knowledge has become. … [Discourse is] that which constitutes human knowledge” (Hacking 1975: 187). Why does language matter to cuneiform “philosophy”? Or, perhaps, rather than Why, we can ask How. In order to answer this question, I examine the social and textual contexts in which a discussion of cuneiform “philosophy” can properly take place, namely in cuneiform scholarship. At the core of cuneiform scholarly practices and knowledge making is list-making. In his recent book Philosophy Before the Greeks, Marc Van De Mieroop argued that the list—the listing structure—provides the basis for a Babylonian epistemology which is grounded in the cuneiform writing system.1 As he states in his more recent work, “Lists were the dominant format in which Mesopotamian intellectuals speculated” (Van De Mieroop this 1 Van De Mieroop (2015).
  • Eblaites - Oxford Reference

    Eblaites - Oxford Reference

    Eblaites - Oxford Reference https://www-oxfordreference-com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/view/10.10... The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East Edited by Eric M. Meyers Publisher: Oxford University Press Print Publication Date: 1997 Print ISBN-13: 9780195065121 Published online: 2011 Current Online Version: 2011 eISBN: 9780199892280 Eblaites. Scholars utilize the ethnonym Eblaites to refer to the people of Ebla, a major Bronze Age city-state in northern Syria. Discussions about the identity of peoples, especially in the Near East, typically rely on factors such as the identification of the language utilized and the gods worshiped. Thus, because the eblaite language is Semitic and many of the gods worshiped at Ebla occur elsewhere in the pantheons of other Semitic peoples, it is generally accepted that the Eblaites were a Semitic people. However, a host of problems specific to refining this statement continues to be debated. The classification of the Eblaite language within the Semitic family of languages is the center of a sharp debate. Some scholars view Eblaite as a dialect of Old Akkadian, in which case it would be proper to speak of the Eblaites as a branch of the East Semites (Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians). Other scholars view Eblaite as a branch of West Semitic, with an especially close relationship to other West Semitic languages utilized in Syria (in particular, the roughly contemporary Amorite and the later-attested Aramaic). The majority of the evidence favors the latter opinion. To cite one example, the Eblaite first-person independent pronoun I is 'ana, exactly as in Amorite and Aramaic.
  • O L O G Y Ancient Society and Economy

    O L O G Y Ancient Society and Economy

    oi.uchicago.edu O L O G Y Ancient Society and Economy I. J. Gelb This report gives the gist of a paper that was read in the "Special Session on Archaeology of Syria: 'The Origins of Cities of Mesopotamia in the Third Millennium B.C.' " In order to avoid further confusion in geographical terminology, two names were introduced in the paper: "Ebla" for northern Syria and "Lagash" for southern Mesopotamia or ancient Babylonia. The names of Ebla and Lagash were chosen to be used symbolically for Syria and Babylonia for obvious reasons, "Ebla" because it is the only site from which doc­ umentation is available, and "Lagash" because it contains the best documentation. For a person who, like myself, has worked for years on the socio-economic history of ancient Babylonia, working on Ebla has been like working in a different world. The vast majority of the sources pertaining to Lagash and its area concern agriculture, including not only plowed fields but also the adjoining pastures, orchards, and forests, pro­ cessing of agricultural products, manufacture of finished goods, and registration of the incoming and outgoing prod­ ucts in the chancellery and its affiliates. Contrasting with the Lagash sources, one finds almost no texts pertaining to agriculture at Ebla, as the overwhelming mass of the economic and administrative sources of Ebla deal with the production of sheep's wool (and much less of linen and goat's hair), manufacture of textiles, and the registration of finished products for internal consumption and export in the chancellery and its affiliates. Facing the archival treasures of Ebla, I felt somewhat like Francisco Pizarro when he entered an Inca storehouse in Cuzco and was overwhelmed by the mountain of wool blan­ kets piled up from floor to ceiling.
  • Two Weights from Temple N at Tell Mardikh-Ebla, Syria: a Link Between Metrology and Cultic Activities in the Second Millennium Bc?

    Two Weights from Temple N at Tell Mardikh-Ebla, Syria: a Link Between Metrology and Cultic Activities in the Second Millennium Bc?

    TWO WEIGHTS FROM TEMPLE N AT TELL MARDIKH-EBLA, SYRIA: A LINK BETWEEN METROLOGY AND CULTIC ACTIVITIES IN THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC? E. Ascalone and L. Peyronel Università di Roma“La Sapienza” The study of ancient Near Eastern metrology is part of the Lower Town (Matthiae 1985: pl. 54; a specific field of research that offers the possibil- 1989a: 150–52, fig. 31, pls. 105, 106), not far from ity to connect information from economic texts the slope of the Acropolis, to the east of the sacred with objects that were used in the pre-monetary area of Ishtar (Temple P2, Monument P3 and the system either for everyday exchange operations Cistern Square with the favissae).1 It was prob- or for “international” commercial transactions. ably built at the beginning of Middle Bronze I (ca. The importance of an approach that takes into 2000–1900 BC) and was destroyed at the end of consideration metrological standards with all the Middle Bronze II, around 1650–1600 BC. The technical matters concerned, as well as the archaeo- temple is formed by a single longitudinal cella logical context of weights and the relationships (L.2500) with a low, 4 m thick mudbrick bench between specimens and other broad functional along the rear wall (M.2501), while the north classes of materials (such as unfinished objects, (M.2393) and south (M.2502) walls are 3 m thick. unworked stones or lumps of metals, administra- The cella is 7.5 m wide and measures 12 m on the tive indicators, and precious items), has been noted preserved long side.
  • Syria: Land of History, Civilizations and War

    Syria: Land of History, Civilizations and War

    OVERVIEW Syria: Land of history, civilizations and war Mazigh M1* Affiliation Abstract 1International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, Ottawa, ON As the Syrians are welcomed into Canada, it is useful to learn about where they are coming from. Syria is an ancient land with a rich history and has always been home to diverse cultures, *Correspondence: national. ethnicities and religions. Palmyra was an ancient civilization that arose during the second [email protected] century. Syria became part of the land of Islam in AD 640 and was a cultural, religious and artistic center. During the Middle Ages, Syria came under the control of the Crusaders and was part of the Ottoman Empire from the early fifteen hundreds until the end of the nineteenth century. During World War I it came under French influence and was recognized as an independent nation after World War II. In 1963, Hafez al-Assad led a military coup and since then, Syria has been ruled under emergency law. After al-Assad died in 2000, his son Bashar al-Assad was elected President in an uncontested presidential campaign. Before the current conflict, Syria had a population of approximately 22 million people but now about half the population have been displaced internally and into neighbouring countries, including approximately four million refugees. It is estimated that 250,000 people have died during the Syrian conflict. Suggested citation: Mazigh M. Syria: Land of history, civilizations and war. Can Comm Dis Rep 2016;42-Suppl 2:S1-2. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v42is2a01 Introduction In terms of religion, approximately three quarters of the people are Muslims including both Sunnis, who constitute the Syria is an ancient land with a rich history that has always been largest religious group and Shiites such as Ismailis, Twelvers home to diverse cultures, ethnicities and religions.
  • University of Groningen Elementary Education at Nippur. the Lists Of

    University of Groningen Elementary Education at Nippur. the Lists Of

    University of Groningen Elementary education at Nippur. The lists of trees and wooden objects Veldhuis, Nicolaas Christiaan IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 1997 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Veldhuis, N. C. (1997). Elementary education at Nippur. The lists of trees and wooden objects. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 04-10-2021 Elementary Education At Nippur RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGEN Elementary Education at Nippur.
  • Karduniaš. Babylonia Under the Kassites

    Karduniaš. Babylonia Under the Kassites

    557 BIBLIOTHECA ORIENTALIS LXXV N° 5-6, september-december 2018 558 §2 The Early Kassite Period (pp. 45-92) by Frans van Koppen The generally neglected Early Kassite period is discussed at length by van Koppen. This chapter provides an in-depth study discussing first the Kassites in the Old Babylonian period and their military background, i.e., military specializa- tion, command structure, settlements and social organization, followed by a careful description of Kassite-Babylonian interactions in the Late Old Babylonian period, i.e., the Samḫarû and Bimatû under Ammī-ṣaduqa and the Kassite kingdoms in the Diyala under Samsu-ditāna, and finally the role of the Kassites in the Fall of Babylon and their position thereafter. §3 Political Interactions between Kassite Babylonia and Assyria, Egypt and Ḫatti during the Amarna Age (pp. 93-111) by Jared L. Miller Miller focuses on political history in the Late Bronze Age, providing a concise introduction to the political interactions between Kassite Babylonia and its neighbours in the Amarna Age. An interesting contribution is Miller’s update of the chronological synchronisms between Babylon, Assyria, Egypt and Ḫatti, resulting in a helpful chart (pp. 105-106). Finally, an enticing scenario is presented, based on a passage in a prayer of Muršili II (KUB 14.4 ii 3’-8’) regarding the Hittite tawannanna, the Babylonian wife of Šuppiluliuma I: here, Miller advocates a different reading than hitherto accepted, suggesting that she was siphoning off wealth from Hattuša to Babylon and discusses its possible political implications. §4 Of Kings, Princesses, and Messengers: Babylonia’s ASSYRIOLOGIE International Relations during the 13th century BC (pp.
  • Assyrian Period (Ca. 1000•fi609 Bce)

    Assyrian Period (Ca. 1000•fi609 Bce)

    CHAPTER 8 The Neo‐Assyrian Period (ca. 1000–609 BCE) Eckart Frahm Introduction This chapter provides a historical sketch of the Neo‐Assyrian period, the era that saw the slow rise of the Assyrian empire as well as its much faster eventual fall.1 When the curtain lifts, at the close of the “Dark Age” that lasted until the middle of the tenth century BCE, the Assyrian state still finds itself in the grip of the massive crisis in the course of which it suffered significant territorial losses. Step by step, however, a number of assertive and ruthless Assyrian kings of the late tenth and ninth centuries manage to reconquer the lost lands and reestablish Assyrian power, especially in the Khabur region. From the late ninth to the mid‐eighth century, Assyria experiences an era of internal fragmentation, with Assyrian kings and high officials, the so‐called “magnates,” competing for power. The accession of Tiglath‐pileser III in 745 BCE marks the end of this period and the beginning of Assyria’s imperial phase. The magnates lose much of their influence, and, during the empire’s heyday, Assyrian monarchs conquer and rule a territory of unprecedented size, including Babylonia, the Levant, and Egypt. The downfall comes within a few years: between 615 and 609 BCE, the allied forces of the Babylonians and Medes defeat and destroy all the major Assyrian cities, bringing Assyria’s political power, and the “Neo‐Assyrian period,” to an end. What follows is a long and shadowy coda to Assyrian history. There is no longer an Assyrian state, but in the ancient Assyrian heartland, especially in the city of Ashur, some of Assyria’s cultural and religious traditions survive for another 800 years.