DOCSLIB.ORG

Northwest Plant Names and Symbols for Ecosystem Inventory and Analysis Fourth Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-46 1976 NORTHWEST PLANT NAMES AND SYMBOLS FOR ECOSYSTEM INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS FOURTH EDITION PACIFIC NORTHWEST FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE PORTLAND, OREGON This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. CONTENTS Page . INTRODUCTION TO FOURTH EDITION ....... 1 Features and Additions. ......... 1 Inquiries ................ 2 History of Plant Code Development .... 3 MASTER LIST OF SPECIES AND SYMBOLS ..... 5 Grasses.. ............... 7 Grasslike Plants. ............ 29 Forbs.. ................ 43 Shrubs. .................203 Trees. .................225 ABSTRACT LIST OF SYNONYMS ..............233 This paper is basicafly'an alpha code and name 1 isting of forest and rangeland grasses, sedges, LIST OF SOIL SURFACE ITEMS .........261 rushes, forbs, shrubs, and trees of Oregon, Wash- ington, and Idaho. The code expedites recording of vegetation inventory data and is especially useful to those processing their data by contem- porary computer systems. Editorial and secretarial personnel will find the name and authorship lists i ' to be handy desk references. KEYWORDS: Plant nomenclature, vegetation survey, I Oregon, Washington, Idaho. G. A. GARRISON and J. M. SKOVLIN are Assistant Director and Project Leader, respectively, of Paci fic Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station; C. E. POULTON is Director, Range and Resource Ecology Applications of Earth Sate1 1 ite Corporation; and A. H. WINWARD is Professor of Range Management at Oregon State University . and a fifth letter also appears in those instances where a varietal name is appended to the genus and INTRODUCTION species. (3) Some genera symbols consist of four letters or less, e.g., ACER, AIM, GEUM, IRIS, POA, TO FOURTH EDITION RHUS, ROSA. In preparation for this edition an attempt was made to meet the requests of several users of the list for additional common names. Searches for these vernacular terms were not always successful ; indeed, some plants have not as yet acquired an Brief, and easily translated, alpha symbols English language label and a blank follows the are now the accepted "language" or code for use by , = sign. vegetation scientists and those inventorying re- sources of forest and rangeland. These symbols A completely new feature of this listing is a greatly facilitate entering plant species identi- notation of authorship of each scientific name, fication on field sheets and assist subsequent done in the form prescribed by the International computer compilation and analysis of vegetation Rules of Botanical Nomenclature. This tabulation data. Standardization of the symbol list among should be a speedy reference source for scientists, agencies and colleges within a multistate area technicians, writers, editors and advanced students. makes it easier to adapt college students to sumner fieldwork of several agencies and makes Partitioning of the plant symbol list by growth feasible the pooling of vegetation data from form is retained in this edition, i.e. , separate various institutions agencies, and locations sections for grasses, grasslike plants (sedges and in a region. The code system presented here is rushes) , forbs , shrubs , and trees. Workers needing accepted usage for many government agencies and growth-form designators for computer work wi11 find university research workers in Oregon, Washington, this problem best handled by adding a numeric code and Idaho. on the basic data sheet such as the field plot form. A number can be added just ahead of each alpha symbol Features and Additions by using the following scheme: This fourth\edition of plant coding for Oregon, 1 = Grass Washington, and Idaho now updates the listings with 2 = Grasslike plant hundreds of additional plant names and has been checked against the latest taxonomic works for the 3 = Forb (broad-leaved herbs plus ferns and three-State area. The current listing maintains allied families) the basic four-letter system of symbol selection 4 = Shrub with the following standard variations: 5 = Tree (1) A single digit number appears as a suffix to the alpha symbol for certain species to resolve 6 = Moss potential duplication of symbols. A section is again provided for locating new (2) A fifth letter is part of most symbols valid names of species whose old names have dropped which designate a genus without indicating species, into synonymity. The user of the publication is 1 alerted about synonyms by a numeric code on the Little, Elbert L. , Jr. far right side of each page of tabular material, 1953. Check list of native and naturalized and it instructs the reader thus: trees of the United States (including Alaska). U.S. Department of Agricul- 1 = Name 1 isted is a synonym, new name wi11 ture Handbook No. 41. be found in the synonymy section under the same genus; only the species name There were some plant species in southeast has changed. and southwest portions of the province which were not covered by Hitchcock et al. In these instances, 2 = Name 1 isted is a synonym, new Val id name other manuals were consulted such as: will be found in the synonymy section with a shift in genus shown. Munz, Philip A., and David D. Keck. 1970. A flora of California. University Blank = Name listed is valid. of California Press, Berkeley. Almost all of the synony problems involved in Davis, Ray J. using this listing could be eliminated if main ' 1952. Flora of Idaho. William C. Brown dependence for species identification is on the Co., Dubuque, Iowa. single volume "Flora of the Pacific Northwest" or the five-volume work, Vascular Plants of the Four subspecies were added to the woody group Pacific Northwest." But if the user of the code of sagebrush .(Artemisia spp.) by A. H. Winward, 0 list lacks either of these works by C. Leo Hitch- using the sagebrush classification scheme of Beetle cock et al., the synonym list is very helpful. and Young, which was developed in their publications: Generally, scientific names in the edition Beetle, A. A. were verified in the following publications: 1960. A study of sagebrush: The section tridentata of Artemisia. Wyomi ng Hitchcock, A. S. Agricul turd1 Experiment Station 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United Bulletin 368. States. Ed. 2 (revised by Agnes Chase). U.S. Department of Agri- Beetle, A. A., and A. Young. culture Miscellaneous Publication 200. 1965. A third subspecies in the Artemisia tridentata compl ex. Rhodora 67 : Hitchcock, C. Leo, Arthur Cronquist, Marion 405-406. Owenby, and J. W. Thompson. 1955-69. Vascular plants of the Pacific Inquiries Northwest. Parts 1-5. University of Wash- ington Press, Seattle. The lists of species shown here plus some sup- plementary information are stored in the files of Hitchcock, C. Leo, and Arthur Cronquist. the Oregon State University Computer Center; thus 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. there are extracts and combinations of information University of Washington Press, from the stored material which are available as Seattle. computer printouts at nominal fees. These special 2 listings are: 1. Scientific names in alphabetical order without respect to the growth form grouping or sequence of symbols. 2. Scientific names with listing controlled by alphabetical order of the alpha symbols. 3. Listing by common names in alphabetical order. 4. A limited listing of just those species whose alpha symbols carry a numeric suffix, the tie breaker. Another option is change of format from this publi- cation to one with any computer data field listed singly or in most any combination or order across the page. Requests for these compilations should be made to the Range1 and Resources Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. From time to time this plant symbol list will be revised to meet changes and advances in plant taxonow. The Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station and Oregon State University, which hold the master data and program for assign- ing plant symbols, will make these revisions. They will also welcome suggestions about addition of new species and the location of possible errors in the current listings. History of Plant Code Development Genesis of plant codes for recording vegetation studies of forests and range1 ands is traceable back to 1912 and involves several notable plant ecologists. This interesting history is given in the introduction to the third edition, entitled, "Northwest Range Plant Symbols." It was published in 1967 by the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station as Re- search Paper PNW-40. Supply of the third edition is exhausted, although file copies may be seen at certain libraries. 3 MASTER LIST OF SPECIES AND SYMBOLS 5 Grasses 7 SPP. SCIENTIFIC NAME SYN. CODE GENUS NAME SPECIES EPITHET VARIETAL EPITWT SCIEFtTIFIC KAME ALTHORSHIP CODE COMMON kANE AECIL AEGILOPS L. =GOATGRASS A€ CY AE GILOP S CYLINDRICA HOqT- ACROP AGROPYRON GAERTN. =WkE AT GRA SS AMURE NSE DROBOV ACAM AGROPYRON =APUR WHEATGRASS CANIYUH (Lo) BEAUVo ACCA AGROPYRON =CUTTIbG WHEATGRASS AGCAA AGROPYRON CANIYUH A NO INU M (ScRIBNo- & SHITH) Co Lo PITCHC. AGCAC AGROPYRON CANINUH CANINUM (Lo)- BEAUVo AGCAH AGROPYRON CANIYUH HAJUS (VASEY)- Co Lo HITCt'Co AGCR AGROPYRON CRISTA TUH (Le) GAERTNo =FAIRWAY CRE STEO WHEAT GRASS AGOA AGROPYRON CASYST ACHYUM (HC KoI SCKIBNo -pH IC KSP IKE WHE AT GRASS DESERT ORUM SCHULT ACOE AGROPYRON -STA~OARO CRESTEO WHEATGRASS ELONGA TUH HOZT EX BEAUV ACEL AGROPYRON -TiLL hHE ATGkASS I kERM E RY OB 1 AGIN AGROPYRON -B~AROLESSBLUEBUNCH WHEATGRASS NTERM E 01UM (HgST ) BEA V AGIN 2 AGROPYRON I -1NiERPEOyAf E W hE AT BRASS PUN GE N S (PERSO) R. & SO AGPU AGROPYRON -STIFFLEAF QUACKBRAZS RFPEN S (Lo) BEAUV. AGRE AGROPYRON =QUACKGRASS 1 AGRI AGROPYRON R IPA?IUH SCRIeNo SHITH =STRE AHBANK HHE PTGRPSS 1 SAX12 OLA AGSA AGROPYRON pl%"o T A I L w HE ATG R A s s AGSC 2 AbROPYHON SCR 15 N ER I UAZEV sr3121 BEAUVo 1 ACSI AGROPYRON cuq =SIBERIAN WHEATGRASS SHITi RYoa.
Recommended publications
  • Resemblance and Camouflage in Graeco-Roman Antiquity 169

    Resemblance and Camouflage in Graeco-Roman Antiquity 169

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Research Information System University of Turin Sign Systems Studies 38(1/4), 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 Resemblance and camouflage 7 in Graeco-Roman antiquity 8 Massimo Leone 9 Department of Philosophy, University of Turin 10 Via S. Ottavio 20, 10124, Torino, Italy 11 e-mail: [email protected] 12 13 Abstract. In the twenty-eighth book of the Naturalis Historia Pliny the Elder 14 claims that, if a chameleon’s left leg is roasted together with a herb bearing the 15 same name, and everything is mixed with ointment, cut in lozenges, and stored in 16 a wooden little box, this will bestow on those who own it a perfect camouflage. 17 The ring of Gyges (Plato, etc.), that of Midas (Pliny), the heliotropium (Pliny), the 18 dracontitis (Philostratus): ancient cultures abound with references to objects, 19 recipes, and techniques able to bestow different kinds of invisibility, meant as a 20 perfect resemblance with the environment. At the same time, these same cultures 21 also teem with references to how to avert the perfect camouflage: for instance, by 22 being endowed with a pupula duplex, a double pupil (Ovid). 23 The paper explores such vast corpus of texts from the point of view of a 24 semiotics of cultures, in order to track the roots of a conception of camouflage 25 that, from these ancient cultures on, develops through intricate paths into the 26 contemporary imaginaires (and practices) of invisibility.
  • Download DICE 18.1 Full Text

    Download DICE 18.1 Full Text

    DICE 18/1 DIVERSITÉ ET IDENTITÉ CULTURELLE EN EUROPE * DIVERSITATE ŞI IDENTITATE CULTURALĂ ÎN EUROPA DICE Diversité et identité culturelle en Europe http://www.diversite.eu/dice Index Copernicus Marcă înregistrată OSIM 1. Présentation Notre revue est dédiée au Dialogue Culturel Européen, ouvert à l'universalité; les analyses publiées concernent le rapport entre particulier et général, individuel et collectif, local et universel, langue, attitudes, comportements, création, et action concrète. Les sections de chaque numéro traitent différents aspects de ces sujets: · idéologie, politique, aspects socio-économiques, fondements éducationnels du dialogue global et européen; · identité culturelle vs multilinguisme; langues minoritaires/langues nationales/langues officielles/langues universelles; éléments diachroniques et synchroniques dans les contacts culturels et linguistiques; · théories et pratiques de l'altérité, évolution des mentalités, culture institutionnelle dans le rapport “Local Européen Global”; · affiliations, inter-influences, représentations spécifiques des courants, des écoles, des tendances au niveau international dans la littérature, l'art, la science, la religion, l'éducation, etc.; · distribution spatio-temporelle de certains thèmes, styles, créations et techniques des cultures traditionnelles et modernes. 2. Informations techniques Notre revue suit, en général, les règles en usage de publication des textes. La Maison d`Édition se réserve le droit d’opérer certaines modifications liées à la mise en forme des articles soumis. ● Délais d'envoi des contributions: - Le 1er mars pour le No. 1; le 1er septembre pour le No. 2 de chaque année. ● Langues de rédaction acceptées - Le texte: français, anglais, allemand, espagnol, italien. - Le résumé et les mots-clé : anglais (roumain). ● Consignes de rédaction - Notre publication suit, en général, les normes usuelles de rédaction des textes.
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road

    Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road

    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
  • Chapter 4. Hatred in Hesiod

    Chapter 4. Hatred in Hesiod

    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Kilgallon, Silvie Title: Hatred in Hesiod General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Hatred in Hesiod Silvie Kilgallon A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, January 2019. Word Count: 75,322. 2 Abstract: This thesis examines the conception and role of hatred in the Theogony and Works and Days of Hesiod.
  • Catalogue of United States Public Documents /March, 1896

    Catalogue of United States Public Documents /March, 1896

    No. 15 March, 1896 CATALOGUE OF United States Public Documents Issued Monthly BY F. A. CRANDALL SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS. Government Printing Office Washington • Government Printing Office 1896 Table of Contents Page Page Congress of United States..................... 3 Navy Department..................................... 54 Laws...................................................... 3 Justice, Department of........................... 55 Senate................................................... 6 Post-Office Department........................... 55 House............... •.................................. 18 Interior Department............................... 57 Documents of preceding Con- Agriculture, Department of................. 63 gresses .......................................... 40 Courts of United States......................... 66 President of United States.................... 40 District of Columbia............................... 66 State Department.................................... 40 Various Bureaus...................................... 67 Treasury Department............................. 46 General Note.............................................. 68 War Department...................................... 51 New publications on sale................ 70 Abbreviations Used in this Catalogue Agricultural Soils...................................A. S. Number, numbers.......................................no. Appendix...................................................app. Oblong............................................................obi.
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
  • Annex 3: List of "Vegetables" According to Article 1.1 (The English Names Are Decisive)

    Annex 3: List of "Vegetables" According to Article 1.1 (The English Names Are Decisive)

    Annex 3: List of "Vegetables" according to Article 1.1 (The English names are decisive) Family Genus species English name Malvaceae Abelmoschus caillei (A. Chev.) Stevels West African okra Malvaceae Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench common okra Lamiaceae Agastache foeniculum anise Alliaceae Allium ampeloprasum L. leek, elephant garlic Alliaceae Allium cepa L. onion, shallot Alliaceae Allium chinense Maxim. rakkyo Alliaceae Allium fistulosum L. scallions, japanese bunching onion Alliaceae Allium sativum L. garlic Alliaceae Allium schoenoprasum L. chives Alliaceae Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng garlic chives Amaranthaceae Amaranthus cruentus L. Amaranth, African spinach, Indian spinach Amaranthaceae Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Thell. Amaranth, pigweed Apiaceae Anethum graveolens L. dill Apiaceae Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm. chervil Fabaceae Apios americana Moench American ground nut Apiaceae Apium graveolens L. celery, celeriac Fabaceae Arachis hypogea L. peanut Compositae Arctium lappa burdock Brassicaceae Armoracia rusticana G . Gaertn., B. Mey & Scherb. horseradish Asteraceae Artemisia dracunculus var. sativa tarragon Asteraceae Artemisia absinthium wormwood Asparagaceae Asparagus officinalis L. asparagus Asteraceae Aster tripolium sea lavender Amaranthaceae Atriplex hortenis L. mountain spinach, orache Amaranthaceae Atriplex hortensis orache Brassicaceae Barbarea vulgaris R. Br. winter cress Basellaceae Basella alba L. Malabar spinach Cucurbitaceae Benincasa hispida Thunb. wax gourd Amaranthaceae Beta vulgaris L. chard, vegetable (red) beetroot Boraginaceae Borago officinalis borage, starflower Brassicaceae Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. mustard Brassicaceae Brassica napus var. napobrassica rutabaga Brassicaceae Brassica oleracea L. broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, kale, kohlrabi, curly kale, romanesco, savoy cabbage Brassicaceae Brassica rapa L. turnip, Chinese broccoli, Chinese cabbage, pak choi, tatsoi, Kumutsuna, Japanese mustard spinach Brassicaceae Brassica rapa japonica mustard, mitzuna Solanaceae Capsicum annuum L.
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
  • Save T I M Cent!

    Save T I M Cent!

    Q0NTAIN8 MORE HAS THE LARGEST 5*REW8 >i THAK ANT OTflEE PAPEB- :;- Northern New Jersey. :•; *************** VOL. xxni. DOVER, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1893. NO. 11 Z.ETTEB FBOM B£V- A. O, DILL. A KBW OLD MAOAZINE. DEATH OF JUSTICE B0UDPEH. NATIONAL QUAUD BEOBQAHIZA- There ora no"bluBMomlJiy»"inor "Bboi Tbe pulillnbera of Tha National Uagarlnc Juitlca Edward Wallace Bcuddur, ot TIOIT. fcldi.1 totlio muneo vrtilch adjoins the Pr. have acquired tbd Megaclneof American Hia 8upnm« Court, <Ued euMealy at bUbouie on nib«rs of tlio Nalioiml Uuavd t,r& a.nz- rtnuwp imf nuzuT BT I jUrlan Church and wssiop house an tbetory, whlub was edited liy Mrs. JI«rtha J Grcfiiivood avenue, Tronton, at l().:iO o'clock iousfy waiting to bear of further develop- )ura(iiiugo grounds. Hie mitur uoi Lamb until tei- deatb ouJanusry ltd lost last Priday night. Ue bad atU.-iided the Cir- ments in the reorgttnlzatiuu of the First Bri- SAVE TIM CENT! tbs 1A«U tennis cuurU which (a tfae Hummer Wltb tho February tituo them t cuit Court during tbe J»y, ami was In appir- d IkbMmbld time Is the favorite resort, m tbe etfbt of historical junrusli ara mergml Into on*, mt good bualtb and e^irite wlicn he left tin itln^H and plans for reorganization were RUBBERS. afUrnoon and early evening, of thttladlni and tie name, llagnxlne of Amerlmn Ulitory, lourt roam. Aft«r returning to bis Louie be uued. As tlie brigade is cou»tltuted now, s PEOPaiKTOBg. gentleman f row Uie two ho(*!« nnt hr tveay.
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae

    Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae

    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
  • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014

    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014

    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.