DOCSLIB.ORG

The Materiality of Authority: Ornamental Objects and Negotiations of Sovereignty in the Algonquian Middle Atlantic (A.D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects Fall 2016 The Materiality of Authority: Ornamental Objects and Negotiations of Sovereignty in the Algonquian Middle Atlantic (A.d. 900 - 1680) Christopher Judd Shephard College of William and Mary - Arts & Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Shephard, Christopher Judd, "The Materiality of Authority: Ornamental Objects and Negotiations of Sovereignty in the Algonquian Middle Atlantic (A.d. 900 - 1680)" (2016). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1499449858. http://doi.org/10.21220/S2M65M This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Materiality of Authority: Ornamental Objects and Negotiations of Sovereignty in the Algonquian Middle Atlantic (A.D. 900 – 1680) Christopher Judd Shephard Springfield, VA Master of Arts, College of William and Mary, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary January, 2017 © Copyright by Christopher J. Shephard 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation investigates the emergence, development, and transformation of centralized political authority within Algonquian societies of the Late Woodland and early Colonial period (A.D. 900 – 1680) southern Middle Atlantic. Sixteenth and 17th century European accounts describe coastal Algonquian- speaking societies of modern day Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina as organized into multi-community polities structured by hierarchical political authority, centralized decision-making, and pervasive inequality. However, the hallmarks typically associated with chiefly political organization are almost non- existent in the region’s archaeological record. Colonial chroniclers, however, were adamant that the most highly valued indigenous objects, shell and copper adornment, flowed through chiefly lineages, a relationship largely neglected within the regional archaeological scholarship. Ultimately, this dissertation explores sovereignty and the material processes that mitigated relationships of authority and subjection. Drawing on archaeological, ethnohistorical, and ethnographic evidence, three key avenues of inquiry are pursued. First, the organization of the pre- and post-Colonial economy and the ways that the consumption, movement, and enactment of social practices associated with ornamentation influenced the construction of a region-wide political system. Second, the materiality of wealth objects, and the extent to which they could act as social agents in defining and reorienting sociopolitical roles. And finally, the regional organization of production and the potential of new technology (LA-ICP-MS) to identify shell ornament production locales. The results of these analyses suggest that although individuals and communities consumed and deployed shell and copper ornamentation in a variety of ways, these materials and their association with the human body directed the flow of power across the coastal Algonquian political geography. Through various engagements with shell and copper ornaments, social actors created historical infrastructures that channeled manitou, or animacies that could inhabit humans and objects, in an effort to bring prosperity and balance to the lived world. This study concludes that pre-Colonial notions of sovereignty within the region hinged on the differential ability of individuals to socialize unpredictable and often dangerous foreign objects. Relying on their constant flow, however, this form of sovereignty proved unstable and easily subverted. The emergence of new exchange networks and the development of a localized craft industry, both of which occurred within the region during the 17th century, fundamentally redefined relationships of authority and subjection, as sovereignty became distributed across increasingly localized political entities. This is not to say that the violence and large-scale dispossession of Native people were not significant factors in the reordering of sovereign relationships in the wake of colonialism, but that new economic circumstances provided new avenues for negotiating and contesting political relationships. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv Dedications viii List of Tables ix List of Figures x Chapter 1. Objects and Authority in Documents and Dirt 1 Disentangling the Powhatan from Popular History 9 Reframing Authority in the Southern Middle Atlantic 12 Methodology and Organization 14 Contributions 17 Chapter 2. Power, Sovereignty, and the Coastal Algonquian Sociopolitical World 20 Archaeologies of Materiality 24 Value in Space and Time 37 Exchange, Production, and the pre-Capitalist Economy 41 Colonialism and Material Culture 53 Archaeology and Sovereignty 57 Chapter 3. Power Redirected: Algonquian Ontologies, Animate Objects, and Notions of Authority in the Indigenous Southern Middle Atlantic 70 Manitou and the Algonquian Material World 74 Foreign Objects and Cultural Metaphors 79 i Movement, Singularity, and Sacrifice 94 Algonquian Wealth and the Development of Intercultural Value Systems 99 Colonial Law and Native Subjection on Virginia’s Eastern Shore 107 Chapter 4. Adorning the Living and the Dead: The Construction and Legitimization of the Political Collective 134 Shell and Copper Ornament Consumption in Time and Space 138 Materialities of Mortuary Ritual 142 Mortuary Ceremonialism and Social Difference 147 Burial Practices and Corporate Association 150 Adornment and Non-Mortuary Social Practices 173 Chapter 5. Craft Specialization and the Regional Organization of Production 206 Documentation of Shell Bead Production 209 Geographic Distribution of Hard Clam and Whelk and Potential Production Zones 215 Previous Shell Sourcing Research 221 Methodology for Sourcing Shell Beads from the Circum-Chesapeake 223 Shell Geochemistry, Lithology, and Elemental Uptake in Mollusks 225 The Chesapeake Geochemical Environment 227 Preparation of LA-ICP-MS Shell Samples 228 ii Instrumentation 229 Impacts to Artifacts 230 Limitations 230 Results 231 Chapter 6. Conclusion 253 Objects as Agents 254 Manitou and Shifting Notions of Sovereignty 258 Production and Networks of Exchange 262 Appendix 268 Bibliography 301 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The success of this project was only possible with the help of a great number of people. Some provided guidance in research, others contributed expertise in the more technical aspects of this study, and still others offered encouraging words and support during the long, and often lonely writing process. To those whom I have forgotten to mention here, please know that I am forever grateful for your support. The early stages of my research were funded by the Gloria S. King Fellowship administered by the Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory. In addition to the much needed funding, the MAC Lab staff provided me a place to stay during my time in St. Leonard, and were exceedingly generous with their time and resources. Patricia Samford, Ed Chaney, Rebecca Morehouse, Sarah Rivers-Cofield, and Erin Wingfield offered invaluable guidance in choosing site collections that became central to my research project. They provided access to those collections, facilitated conversations with state and federal agencies when I sought permission to conduct invasive analyses, and gave me a quiet place to work. I also extend a debt of gratitude to Julia King of St. Mary’s College for creating the fellowship in her mother’s memory. This dissertation project also took me to North Carolina, whose archaeological resources I was largely unfamiliar with in the early stages of research. Susan Myers, Delores Hall, and John Mintz at the NC Office of State Archaeology made me feel welcome in their laboratory and guided me toward useful sites and reports that I would have never found on my own. Veronica Johnson pulled collections for me and walked me through the state cataloging system, never hesitating to answer any of my many questions. The staff at the OSA also pointed me toward collections housed at East Carolina University where Charles Ewen provided valuable insight into colonial economics on the North Carolina coastal plain and facilitated my study of several site collections. Although I never actually met them, Clay Swindell of the Museum of the Albemarle and Charles Heath offered unpublished manuscripts and a wealth of knowledge regarding Native archaeology in eastern North Carolina. Closer to home, this research allowed me to engage with Virginia’s archaeological community who have consistently offered valuable feedback and support above and beyond the bounds of professional obligation. Elizabeth Moore at the Virginia Museum of Natural History welcomed me into her lab, introduced me to volunteers and museum staff, and shared with me the insights iv she gained from working with the collections at the museum that I sought to analyze. She provided valuable feedback on my research proposal and artifact loan request, which greatly improved both products. Dee Deroche at the
Recommended publications
  • Bladensburg Prehistoric Background

    Bladensburg Prehistoric Background

    Environmental Background and Native American Context for Bladensburg and the Anacostia River Carol A. Ebright (April 2011) Environmental Setting Bladensburg lies along the east bank of the Anacostia River at the confluence of the Northeast Branch and Northwest Branch of this stream. Formerly known as the East Branch of the Potomac River, the Anacostia River is the northernmost tidal tributary of the Potomac River. The Anacostia River has incised a pronounced valley into the Glen Burnie Rolling Uplands, within the embayed section of the Western Shore Coastal Plain physiographic province (Reger and Cleaves 2008). Quaternary and Tertiary stream terraces, and adjoining uplands provided well drained living surfaces for humans during prehistoric and historic times. The uplands rise as much as 300 feet above the water. The Anacostia River drainage system flows southwestward, roughly parallel to the Fall Line, entering the Potomac River on the east side of Washington, within the District of Columbia boundaries (Figure 1). Thin Coastal Plain strata meet the Piedmont bedrock at the Fall Line, approximately at Rock Creek in the District of Columbia, but thicken to more than 1,000 feet on the east side of the Anacostia River (Froelich and Hack 1975). Terraces of Quaternary age are well-developed in the Bladensburg vicinity (Glaser 2003), occurring under Kenilworth Avenue and Baltimore Avenue. The main stem of the Anacostia River lies in the Coastal Plain, but its Northwest Branch headwaters penetrate the inter-fingered boundary of the Piedmont province, and provided ready access to the lithic resources of the heavily metamorphosed interior foothills to the west.
  • The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation

    The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation

    The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation by Harold Walker Elliott A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip Deloria, Co-Chair, Harvard University Professor Matthew Lassiter, Co-Chair Associate Professor Matthew Countryman Professor Barbra Meek Professor Tiya Miles, Harvard University Harold Walker Elliott [email protected] ORCID iD 0000-0001-5387-3188 © Harold Walker Elliott 2019 DEDICATION To my father and mother, Hal and Lisa Elliott And for Lessie Sweatt McCloud, her ancestors, and her descendants ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the culmination of eight years of graduate study and nearly a decade of research, writing, and editing. The result is deeply imperfect. Its faults come from my many shortcomings as an author. For anything this project does accomplish, I owe credit to the many people who have helped me along the way. Completing this project would have been impossible without the love, support, and inspiration of my parents, Hal and Lisa Elliott. During my upbringing, they instilled the values that guided me through the moral choices that a project like this one entails. My mother and her family have always been the driving forces behind my research into Lumbee and American Indian history. My father, a reluctant physician, passed down his fondness for history and dream of writing it. In the many difficult moments over the past eight years, my parents steadied me with long hugs or reassuringly familiar, South Carolina-accented voices on the phone.
  • Werowocomoco Was Principal Residence of Powhatan

    Werowocomoco Was Principal Residence of Powhatan

    erowocomoco was principal residence of Powhatan, afterwards Werowocomoco began to emerge as a ceremonial paramount chief of 30-some Indian tribes in Virginia’s A bird’s-eye view of Werowocomoco as it appears today in Gloucester W and political center for Algonquian-speaking communities coastal region at the time English colonists arrived in 1607. County. Bordered by the York River, Leigh Creek (left) and Bland Creek (right), the archaeological site is listed on the National Register of Historic in the Chesapeake. The process of place-making at Archaeological research in the past decade has revealed not Places and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Register. Werowocomoco likely played a role in the development of only that the York River site was a uniquely important place social ranking in the Chesapeake after A.D. 1300 and in the during Powhatan’s time, but also that its role as a political and origins of the Powhatan chiefdom. social center predated the Powhatan chiefdom. More than 60 artifacts discovered at Werowocomoco Power, Landscape and History – projectile points, stone tools, pottery sherds and English Landscapes associated with Amerindian chiefdoms – copper – are shown for the fi rst time at Jamestown that is, regional polities with social ranking and institutional Settlement with archaeological objects from collections governance that organized a population of several thousand of the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation and the Virginia – often include large-scale or monumental architecture that Department of Historic Resources. transformed space within sacropolitical centers. Developed in cooperation with Werowocomoco site Throughout the Chesapeake region, Native owners Robert F. and C. Lynn Ripley, the Werowocomoco communities constructed boundary ditches Research Group and the Virginia Indian Advisory Board, and enclosures within select towns, marking the exhibition also explores what Werowocomoco means spaces in novel ways.
  • Zoologisch Museum

    Zoologisch Museum

    Bulletin Zoologisch Museum £3 VAN AMSTERDAM » Vol. '4 No. 12 29-IV-1975 Marginella orstomi, a new species from deeper water off the coast of West Africa (Gastropoda, Marginellidae) H.E. Coomans Abstract (Nicklès, 1950: 118-122; Knudsen, 1956: 81-93). Clover (1972) described Marginella huber ti from Marginella (s. str.) orstomi nov. spec. was col- lected at of 200 to off Pointe A related a depth 250 m, LobitOj Angola. species was dredged re- Noire, Congo. The species is related to M. huberti cently from a more northern locality off the coast Clover, 1972, from Angola. Both species have a characteristic white tooth on the inside of the of Congo Brazzaville. outer lip near the posterior end. orstomi Marginella nov. spec. Figs. 1-3. INTRODUCTION Shell medium Description.- sized, elongate pear- The marine malacofauna of West Africa is rich in shaped, whorls; ground colour dirty yellow with Marginellidae. Although many authors recognize on- dark areas, and many dark grey transverse ly one genus, Marginella Lamarck, 1799, in my opin- irregular zigzag lines sometimes crossed by spi- the of at least ion family consists fourty recent ral rows of small dots ; apex sharp, angle of spire genera and subgenera (Coan, 1965; Coomans, 1975). about 70°; aperture straight and rather narrow, The of str. about of the of the the of distribution Marginella s. (type spe- J length shell, design Voluta cies glabella Linnaeus, 1758) is confined the last whorl is visible on the inside of the ap- to West and South Africa. About twenty species of erture; outer lip thickened and deflected outward, str.
  • Fall 2004 Understanding 19Th-Century Industry • The

    Fall 2004 Understanding 19Th-Century Industry • The

    UNDERSTANDING 19TH-CENTURY INDUSTRY • THE BIRTH OF THE MAYA • PREHISTORY DEFROSTED FALL 2004 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 8 No. 3 43> $3.95 7525274 91765 archaeological tours led by noted scholars superb itineraries, unsurpassed service For the past 29 years, Archaeological Tours has been arranging specialized tours for a discriminating clientele. Our tours feature distinguished scholars who stress the historical, anthropological and archaeological aspects of the areas visited. We offer a unique opportunity for tour participants to see and understand historically important and culturally significant areas of the world. Professor Barbara Barletta in Sicily SICILY & SOUTHERN ITALY VIETNAM GREAT MUSEUMS: Byzantine to Baroque Touring includes the Byzantine and Norman monuments Beginning with Hanoi’s rmuseums and ancient pagodas, As we travel from Assisi to Venice, this spectacular tour of Palermo, the Roman Villa in Casale, unique for its 37 we continue into the heartland to visit some of the ethnic will offer a unique opportunity to trace the development rooms floored with exquisite mosaics, Phoenician Motya minorities who follow the traditions of their ancester’s. We of art and history out of antiquity toward modernity in and classical Segesta, Selinunte, Agrigento and will see the temples and relics of the ancient Cham both the Eastern and Western Christian worlds. The Siracusa — plus, on the mainland, Paestum, Pompeii, peoples, and the villages and religious institutions of the tour begins with four days in Assisi, including a day trip Herculaneum and the incredible "Bronzes of Riace." modern Cham. In the imperial city of Hue, marvelous to medieval Cortona.
  • American Indians of the Chesapeake Bay: an Introduction

    American Indians of the Chesapeake Bay: an Introduction

    AMERICAN INDIANS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: AN INTRODUCTION hen Captain John Smith sailed up the Chesapeake Bay in 1608, American Indians had W already lived in the area for thousands of years. The people lived off the land by harvesting the natural resources the Bay had to offer. In the spring, thousands of shad, herring and rockfish were netted as they entered the Chesapeake’s rivers and streams to spawn. Summer months were spent tending gardens that produced corn, beans and squash. In the fall, nuts such as acorns, chestnuts and walnuts were gathered from the forest floor. Oysters and clams provided another source of food and were easily gathered from the water at low tide. Hunting parties were sent overland in search of deer, bear, wild turkey and other land animals. Nearby marshes provided wild rice and tuckahoe (arrow arum), which produced a potato-like root. With so much food available, the American Indians of the Chesapeake region were able to thrive. Indian towns were found close to the water’s edge near freshwater springs or streams. Homes were made out of bent saplings (young, Captain John Smith and his exploring party encounter two Indian men green trees) that were tied into a spearing fish in the shallows on the lower Eastern Shore. The Indians framework and covered with woven later led Smith to the village of Accomack, where he met with the chief. mats, tree bark, or animal skins. Villages often had many homes clustered together, and some were built within a palisade, a tall wall built with sturdy sticks and covered with bark, for defense.
  • Own and Be Owned Archaeological Approaches to the Concept of Possession

    Own and Be Owned Archaeological Approaches to the Concept of Possession

    Own and be owned Archaeological approaches to the concept of possession P AG – Postdoctoral Archaeological Group Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson (Eds) Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 62, 2015 Own and be owned Archaeological approaches to the concept of possession © 2015 by PAG – Postdoctoral Archaeological Group, and the authors Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm www.archaeology.su.se Editors: Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson English revision: Kristin Bornholdt Collins Cover and typography: Anna Röst, Karneol form & kommunikation Printed by Publit, Stockholm, Sweden 2015 ISSN 0349-4128 ISBN 978-91-637-8212-1 Contents Preface vii Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson Introduction: the nature of belongings 1 Alison Klevnäs Things of quality: possessions and animated objects in the Scandinavian Viking Age 23 Nanouschka Myrberg Burström The skin I live in. The materiality of body imagery 49 Fredrik Fahlander To own and be owned: the warriors of Birka’s garrison 73 Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson The propriety of decorative luxury possessions. Reflections on the occurrence of kalathiskos dancers and pyrrhic dancers in Roman visual culture 93 Julia Habetzeder Hijacked by the Bronze Age discourse? A discussion of rock art and ownership 109 Per Nilsson Capturing images: knowledge, ownership and the materiality of cave art 133 Magnus Ljunge Give and take: grave goods and grave robbery in the early middle ages 157 Alison Klevnäs Possession through deposition: the 'ownership' of coins in contemporary British coin-trees 189 Ceri Houlbrook Possession, property or ownership? 215 Chris Gosden About the authors 222 Things of quality: possessions and animated objects in the Scandinavian Viking Age Nanouschka M.
  • Features of Gift Exchange in Market Economy

    Features of Gift Exchange in Market Economy

    UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE ANDREJ RUS FEATURES OF GIFT EXCHANGE IN MARKET ECONOMY LASTNOSTI EKONOMIJE DARU V TRŽNI EKONOMIJI DOKTORSKA DISERTACIJA DOCTORAL THESIS Mentor: prof. dr. Vesna V. Godina Somentor: prof. dr. Josephus D. M. Platenkamp LJUBLJANA, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I would like to thank my mentors dr. Vesna Godina and dr. Jos Platenkamp for their indispensable help and guidance. I would also like to thank to dr. Zlatko Jančič for his comments, which notably improved this thesis. I am also very grateful to Katja Vukčevič and Janez Kne for their really valuable ideas and suggestions in the process of conceiving this thesis. Last but not least, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my family: Darja, Katja and Arjan for their unconditional support and patience. IZJAVA O AVTORSTVU Spodaj podpisani Andrej Rus, z vpisno številko 21041310, Sem avtor doktorskega dela z naslovom: Features of gift exchange in market economy (Lastnosti ekonomije daru v tržni ekonomiji). S svojim podpisom zagotavljam, da: • je predložena doktorska disertacija izključno rezultat mojega raziskovalnega dela; • sem poskrbel, da so dela in mnenja drugih avtorjev oz. avtoric, ki jih uporabljam v predloženem delu, navedena oz. citirana v skladu s fakultetnimi navodili; • sem poskrbel, da so vsa dela in mnenja drugih avtorjev oz. avtoric navedena v seznamu virov, ki je sestavni element predloženega dela in je zapisan v skladu s fakultetnimi navodili; • sem pridobil vsa dovoljenja za uporabo avtorskih del, ki so v celoti prenesena v predloženo delo in sem to tudi jasno zapisal v predloženem delu; • se zavedam, da je plagiatorstvo – predstavljanje tujih del, bodisi v obliki citata bodisi v obliki skoraj dobesednega prafraziranja bodisi v grafični obliki, s katerim so tuje misli oz.
  • Pocahontas Revealed

    Pocahontas Revealed

    Original broadcast: May 8, 2007 BEFORE WATCHING Pocahontas Revealed 1 Ask students to work in groups to make a time line of major events from the initial discovery of America by Paleo-Indians up PROGRAM OVERVIEW until 1607 when the Jamestown NOVA brings together ancient artisans, Colony was founded. Who were the main inhabitants of America when historians, and archeologists to provide a Jamestown was settled? fresh look at the myth of Pocahontas. 2 In this program, scientists are The program: discovering a new perspective on • reviews how Virginia’s Jamestown became an historic event. Organize students into groups and have the first permanent English settlement in each group choose an event in U.S. the New World in 1607. history to investigate from different • recounts that Captain John Smith and other English settlers came perspectives. (Some events to America to hunt for exploitable resources. students may want to explore are • notes that the English settlers planned to trade goods for food with the Boston Tea Party, the Battle of the Alamo, the Battle of the Indians* rather than grow their own. Gettysburg, or the desegregation • recounts how Smith came to be captured by the Indians and was of Little Rock Central High.) Ask eventually taken to their political center, Werowocomoco. each group to present its findings. • presents Smith’s recollection of the historical meeting—written 17 years after it occurred—that took place between him and Chief Powhatan in which Pocahontas reportedly saved his life. AFTER WATCHING • traces how archeologists determined where the Werowocomoco site was and documents key findings indicating the location of the 1 Many of the James Fort colonists died and the community was on longhouse in which the fabled meeting is said to have taken place.
  • Defining the Nanticoke Indigenous Cultural Landscape

    Defining the Nanticoke Indigenous Cultural Landscape

    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
  • Inalienable Wealth in Forster's Howards

    Inalienable Wealth in Forster's Howards

    Inalienable Wealth in Forster’s Howards End In my presentation, I will focus on inherited objects in E. M. Forster’s Howards End (1910). My main focus will be on how Forster portrays inheritance in Edwardian England and it is my claim that Howards End can be read as Forster’s attempt to rescue the ‘society of inheritance’ (concept borrowed from Thomas Piketty) by moving the focus from inherited wealth to inherited values. My analysis is focusing on the house of Howards End in particular and I will argue that the house is an ‘inalienable object’. I have borrowed the concept of inalienable objects from anthropology and I have attached an article about the concept written by Carolyn Folkman Curasi, Linda L. Price and Eric J. Arnould. I have, furthermore, selected some short text passages to illustrate some of the points, I will make in my presentation. For those of you who have not read the novel, I have also attached a plot summary from Wikipedia. References Curasi, Carolyn Folkman, Linda L. Price & Eric J. Arnould, “How Individuals’ Cherished Possessions Become Families’ Inalienable Wealth,” Journal of Consumer Research Vol. 31 (December 2004): 609- 622 Forster, E. M., Howards End, London: Penguin English Library, 2012. Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014 Quotes Chapter 3 “She [Ruth Wilcox] seemed to belong not to the young people and their motor, but to the house, and to the tree that overshadowed it. One knew that she worshipped the past, and that the instinctive wisdom the past can alone bestow had descended upon her – that wisdom to which we give the clumsy name of aristocracy.
  • Conference Program As of March 15, 2017

    Conference Program As of March 15, 2017

    Conference program as of March 15, 2017 Collaboration Sessions bring attendees together to work on a specific project. At the end of the session, the organizers will give attendees the opportunity to help complete the project. PLEASE NOTE Compass Sessions ask two questions: “Where are we?” and, “Where do we want to go?” These sessions ask the This is the final update to the daily schedule that we will publish on the website prior to the confer- audience to reflect on where we should go from here, ence. The following pages are what will appear in the printed Program Guide that will be distrib- with a range of possible directions. uted at the conference. There will certainly be further changes between March 15 and the confer- Update Sessions bring attendees together to fill them in on the latest developments with regard to an project, ence. They will be recorded in a Late Changes handout that each attendee will receive. program, or issue. Attendees emerge from the session fully up-to-date on the topic. Challenge Sessions ask members of the audience to Attendees are urged to download the free GWS2017 mobile conference app. The daily schedule will question their assumptions. Attendees emerge from the session with their critical thinking faculties fully be updated continuously throughout the conference, and so using the mobile app will keep you in engaged. on top of all last-minute changes. You can download the app at Skills Sessions are hands-on training opportunities that increase the capacity of attendees to solve a specific problem. Attendees leave with new skills applicable to https://guidebook.com/g/gws2017/ the problem.