DOCSLIB.ORG

Governor's Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governor's Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report Governor’s Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report 2011 Mission Statement The Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs works to serve as a statewide clearinghouse for information; to identify unmet social and economic needs in the native community; to support government education programs for American Indian youth; to provide support in the process of obtaining Recognition of State and Federal Indian Status; and to promote the awareness and understanding of historical and contemporary American Indian contributions in Maryland. 2 Table of Contents Message from the Governor …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Message from the Executive Director, Governor’s Office of Community Initiatives…………….5 Message from the Chair, Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs………………………………………6 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Commissioners……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Commission Meeting Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………………..9 State and Federal Agency Partner Meetings and Events …………………………………………………….10 State Recognition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....11 2011 initiatives…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Outreach………………………………………………………………………………………………................................14 Commissioners in Action…………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Resident Population………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Maryland Indigenous Tribes………………………………………………………………………………………………19 3 STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE 100 STATE Circle ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401-1925 (410) 974-3901 (TOLL FREE) 1-800-811-8336 TTY USERS CALL VIA MD RELAY A MESSAGE FROM GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY Dear Fellow Marylanders, It is with my best wishes that I present to you the 2011 Annual Report of the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs (MCIA). This report describes the efforts and progress of the MCIA and the American Indian Community in working together to creating a better and brighter future. With State Recognition of the Piscataway Conoy Tribe and the Piscataway Indian Nation, the MCIA continues to strive for the benefit of the American Indian Community as well as promote the welfare of its people. The opportunities for American Indians are continuously growing, and the MCIA In 2011 promoted many programs that strengthened the community in Maryland; especially in the areas of education, employment, business, and health. I commend the staff and commissioners for their exemplary work in 2011, and give my best wishes for continues success in the years to come. Sincerely, Martin O’Malley Governor 4 STATE OF MARYLAND EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT MARTIN O’MALLEY ANTHONY G. BROWN GOVERNOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES STATE OFFICE BUILDING, 15TH FLOOR MAIN NUMBER 410-767-4159 301 WEST PRESTON STREET Keith J. Hart,Israel C. Director “Izzy” Patoka, Executive Director FAX 410-333-5957 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201 TTY 410-333-5181 MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES I would like to congratulate all of the Commissioners on the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs (MCIA). There are only nine commissioners on the MCIA, and as a Commission, they meet more than any other ethnic commission. Your work in 2011 has been a watershed moment in so many areas: teacher training opportunities and a working with the Maryland Department of Education for a statewide curriculum on Native Americans, important progress on the reburial of Maryland’s Native American remains with the first reburial at Jefferson Patterson Park, and of course, of the State recognition of the Piscataway indigenous tribes. Thanks for your tireless leadership and forward-looking approach. I look forward to seeing what we will accomplish together in the years to come. Sincerely, Israel C. “Izzy” Patoka, Executive Director Governor’s Office of Community Initiatives 5 A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Auriel A. Fenwick Chair Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs Dear Friends: It is an honor to present the 2011 Annual Report of the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs. This report presents insight on the accomplishments, challenges and activities of the Commission during this past year. The MCIA is fully committed to helping the American Indian groups residing in Maryland. We are persistent with our work with the Governor, Maryland State agencies, and the American Indian groups in order to address the needs of the communities. This past year, we have focused greatly on working with the Piscataway Conoy and the Piscataway Indian Nation to advance their State recognition. We have also hosted the Committee’s first annual American Indian Heritage Month teacher training workshop, where Commissioner Wanda Lee brought together many individuals from various groups in order to put together a curriculum that focuses on the history and education of Native American studies. In conjunction with the community’s growing interest in Native American studies and education, the Commission maintains its support of government education programs with the intention of serving American Indian youth in Maryland. The Commission has also continued its work with Jefferson Patterson Park. With the help of the Maryland Historical Trust, MCIA’s Working Group was able to repatriate American Indian remains at an appropriate place of repose. As the year progresses, three separate locations will also be selected for upcoming repatriation. We continue to work fervently with various groups and organizations to help make a difference in the Native community. This report is only an overview of the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs activities and involvement in the community. As such, the Commission wishes to express its gratitude to Governor Martin 6 O’Malley, and his administration for its continued support of the American Indian community as we strive to move forward the vision and mission of the Commission. Sincerely, Auriel A. Fenwick EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs (MCIA) dedicated its efforts to five major initiatives during 2011: Recognition, Education, Repatriation, Health and Outreach. Below is a summary of the major work the MCIA accomplished in 2011: State Recognition of Maryland’s indigenous tribes has been long overdue. State recognition is the priority of MCIA, and influences every major initiative the MCIA put forth in 2011. The MCIA took a monumental vote at the end of the year that recommended two Indigenous petitions closer to a long awaited State recognition. The MCIA Education Committee held its first annual American Indian Heritage Month teacher training workshop. During the workshop, over forty State educators learned the histories of the indigenous tribes of Maryland that will be utilized to teach Maryland’s young people for years to come. The MCIA’s Working Group for “An Appropriate Place of Repose” took on the responsibility for returning Maryland’s indigenous ancestral remains to the earth that had been held for over eighty years at the Maryland Historical Trust. In addition, initiatives that have now become annual events prospered with continued and new partnerships. The Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Water Trail kept consultation with American Indians and sought a Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs representative to be on its board. The Minority Outreach and Technical Assistance (MOTA) Program, designed to eliminate health disparities for Native Americans, participated in the celebrations for American Indian Heritage Month in Maryland and used the month as an opportunity to bring more health screenings and health resources to the Native Americans in Maryland. 7 MCIA continues to be a premier resource for insight and consultation from faith-based foundations, educational institutions, out-of-state tribal affiliations, the private sector and federal agencies. Over seventy lectures, presentations and cultural festivals were attended, with thirty-four events in November alone. The Department of Transportation, Department of Natural Resources and Department of Human Resources asked the MCIA members to teach “cultural competency” seminars to many of their inner agencies throughout the year. A look at the Commissioners Commissioners Tribal Affiliation County of Residence Auriel Fenwick, Chair Piscataway Prince George’s County Thomas Windsor, Vice Piscataway Prince George’s County Chair Virginia Busby, Ph.D Archeologist Harford County Kathryn Robbins- Nause-Waiwash Dorchester County Fitzhugh Wanda Lee Lumbee Baltimore County Sherry L. Majors Accohannock Somerset County 8 Guy Wells Cherokee Caroline County Robert Killen Pokomoke Howard County Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs 2011 Meeting Schedule Date Location County February 7 Department of Natural Annapolis Resources March 7 Department of Natural Annapolis Resources April 4 Department of Natural Annapolis Resources May 2 Dorchester Center for Cambridge Performing Arts June 6 Department of Natural Annapolis Resources September 12 Dorchester Center for the Cambridge Performing Arts October 3 Department of Natural Annapolis Resources November 7 Dorchester Center for the Cambridge Performing Arts 9 2011 State and Federal Agency Partner Meetings and Events Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) selected two Native American individuals through the Maryland Commission on Indian Affair’s recommendation, to serve on the Minority Business Enterprise Advisory Committee (MBEAC). These members will advise MDOT on certification and recertification of minority and disadvantaged
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Indians of the Chesapeake Bay: an Introduction
    AMERICAN INDIANS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: AN INTRODUCTION hen Captain John Smith sailed up the Chesapeake Bay in 1608, American Indians had W already lived in the area for thousands of years. The people lived off the land by harvesting the natural resources the Bay had to offer. In the spring, thousands of shad, herring and rockfish were netted as they entered the Chesapeake’s rivers and streams to spawn. Summer months were spent tending gardens that produced corn, beans and squash. In the fall, nuts such as acorns, chestnuts and walnuts were gathered from the forest floor. Oysters and clams provided another source of food and were easily gathered from the water at low tide. Hunting parties were sent overland in search of deer, bear, wild turkey and other land animals. Nearby marshes provided wild rice and tuckahoe (arrow arum), which produced a potato-like root. With so much food available, the American Indians of the Chesapeake region were able to thrive. Indian towns were found close to the water’s edge near freshwater springs or streams. Homes were made out of bent saplings (young, Captain John Smith and his exploring party encounter two Indian men green trees) that were tied into a spearing fish in the shallows on the lower Eastern Shore. The Indians framework and covered with woven later led Smith to the village of Accomack, where he met with the chief. mats, tree bark, or animal skins. Villages often had many homes clustered together, and some were built within a palisade, a tall wall built with sturdy sticks and covered with bark, for defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Nanticoke Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Partners: a History of Piscataway Park
    Preservation and Partners: A History of Piscataway Park Janet A. McDonnell, PhD December 2020 Resource Stewardship and Science, National Capital Area, National Park Service and Organization of American Historians EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the early republic period of American history, President George Washington was the most renowned resident of the Potomac River valley. His sprawling Mount Vernon estate sat on a hill directly across the Potomac River from the 17th century Marshall Hall estate in Maryland. There is ample evidence that Washington and his guests enjoyed and very much appreciated the stunning view. Many years later preserving this view would become the major impetus for establishing what we know today as Piscataway Park (PISC), a few miles south of Washington, DC. These lands along the Maryland shore of Potomac River were actively cultivated during George Washington’s time, and the existing park setting, which includes agricultural lands and open spaces interspersed with forests and wetlands, closely approximates that historic scene. The National Park Service’s (NPS) primary goal and responsibility in managing the park has been, and continues to be, preserving this historic scene of open fields and wooded areas and ensuring that it does not authorize any landscape alterations except those that would restore previously undisturbed sites, reduce visual intrusions, or maintain open fields. The NPS continues to take into account the slope and orientation of the terrain and the tree cover when considering the location of any new facilities. Piscataway Park and its associated lands are for the most part held under scenic easements and constitute a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) historic district made up of nearly 5,000 acres of meadow, woodland, and wetland, along six miles of the Potomac River shoreline from the head of Piscataway Creek to the historic Marshall Hall in Maryland’s Prince George’s and Charles counties.
    [Show full text]
  • American Tri-Racials
    DISSERTATIONEN DER LMU 43 RENATE BARTL American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America We People: Multi-Ethnic Indigenous Nations and Multi- Ethnic Groups Claiming Indian Ancestry in the Eastern United States Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München vorgelegt von Renate Bartl aus Mainburg 2017 Erstgutachter: Prof. Berndt Ostendorf Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Eveline Dürr Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.02.2018 Renate Bartl American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America Dissertationen der LMU München Band 43 American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America by Renate Bartl Herausgegeben von der Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München Mit Open Publishing LMU unterstützt die Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München alle Wissenschaft ler innen und Wissenschaftler der LMU dabei, ihre Forschungsergebnisse parallel gedruckt und digital zu veröfentlichen. Text © Renate Bartl 2020 Erstveröfentlichung 2021 Zugleich Dissertation der LMU München 2017 Bibliografsche Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografe; detaillierte bibliografsche Daten sind im Internet abrufbar über http://dnb.dnb.de Herstellung über: readbox unipress in der readbox publishing GmbH Rheinische Str. 171 44147 Dortmund http://unipress.readbox.net Open-Access-Version dieser Publikation verfügbar unter: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-268747 978-3-95925-170-9 (Druckausgabe) 978-3-95925-171-6 (elektronische Version) Contents List of Maps ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pocomoke Nation
    Page 1 of 2 THE POCOMOKE NATION Website: www.pocomokeindiannation.org email: [email protected] BACKGROUND The Pocomoke is one of several indigenous nations who called present-day Delmarva their home. Its people were culturally aligned with the Algonquian language family and regionally identified as a Northeastern Woodland group. It is likely the Pocomoke had prehistoric roots to the Shawnee, an Algonquin group who traditionally considered the Lenape as “their grandfathers.” Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 observed the native people on the Assateague peninsula. In 1649 Norwood’s ship became stranded off the coast and he and a party of men rowed ashore and requested assistance from the natives to reach the western shore and the English settlement at Jamestown. In 1608 Captain John Smith explored the eastern shore of the Chesapeake Bay and visited a palisaded town and King’s house on the Wighco Flu, now known as the Pocomoke River. According to Capt. Smith these People and its northern neighbor, the Nanticoke, spoke a different dialect than the Accomac and Accohannock groups who he noted were politically and culturally associated with the Powhatan Empire across the Chesapeake Bay. Verrazano’s observations, Norwood’s detailed account and Smith’s journals present an early view of Pocomoke hospitality to strangers and a window in its culture prior to English colonization. SUBTRIBES & TOWNS Early records identify the sub-tribes of the Pocomoke Paramountcy as Annemessee, Acquintica, Gingoteague, Manoakin, Monie, Morumsco, Nusswattux, Pocomoke and Quandanquan, and its towns and villages as Askiminokansen, Arrococo, Monie, Manoakin, Parahockin, and Wighcocomoco. TERRITORY The Pocomoke paramount chiefdom and territory ran from the Chesapeake Bay to the confluence of the Nanticoke and Wicomico rivers, then northeasterly to the Ocean, encompassing forests, swamps, coastal bays and seaside islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide – First Inquiry
    dawnland TEACHER’S GUIDE – FIRST INQUIRY BY DR. MISHY LESSER A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT CULTURAL SURVIVAL AND STOLEN CHILDREN BY ADAM MAZO AND BEN PENDER-CUDLIP COPYRIGHT © 2019 MISHY LESSER AND UPSTANDER FILMS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS DAWNLAND TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................3 B. PREPARING TO TEACH DAWNLAND .................................................................................................................17 C. THE COMPELLING QUESTION TO SUPPORT INQUIRY .........................................................................................22 D. FIRST INQUIRY: FROM TURTLE ISLAND TO THE AMERICAS ...................................................................................24 The First Inquiry spans millennia, beginning tens of thousands of years ago and ending in the eighteenth century with scalp proclamations that targeted Native people for elimination. Many important moments, events, documents, sources, and voices were left out of the lessons you are about to read because they can be accessed elsewhere. We encourage teachers to consult and use the excellent resources developed by Tribal educators, such as: • Since Time Immemorial: Tribal Sovereignty in Washington State • Indian Education for All (Montana) • Haudenosaunee Guide for Educators Lesson 1: The peopling of Turtle Island ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Regular Session of the General Assembly on the Small Business Community.”;
    JOURNAL of PROCEEDINGS of the SENATE of MARYLAND REGULAR SESSION, 2008 VOLUME II Library and Information Services and Legislative Document Management of the Department of Legislative Services General Assembly of Maryland prepared this document. For further information concerning this document contact: Library and Information Services Office of Policy Analysis Department of Legislative Services 90 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Baltimore Area: (410-946-5400) Washington Area: (301-970-5400) Other Areas: (1-800-492-7122) TTY: (410-946-5401) (301-970-5401) TTY users may also call the Maryland Relay Service to contact the General Assembly. E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://mlis.state.md.us The Department of Legislative Services does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or disability in the admission or access to its programs or activities. The Department's Information Officer has been designated to coordinate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.107 of the Department of Justice Regulations. Requests for assistance should be directed to the Information Officer at Library and Information Services of the Department of Legislative Services. 2008 SENATE JOURNAL INDEX OF DAYS Legislative Day Page Legislative Day Page January 9…………………….…...……...1 February 27……………………………....973 January 10………………………..…….76 February 28……………….......……….…984 January 11………………………..…….84 February 29……………..………………1013 January 14……………………..……….93 March 3……………………..…………..1046 January
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Honorable Dan Boren, GAO House of Representatives April 2012 INDIAN ISSUES Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes GAO-12-348 April 2012 INDIAN ISSUES Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes Highlights of GAO-12-348, a report to the Honorable Dan Boren, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found As of January 3, 2012, the United Of the approximately 400 non-federally recognized tribes that GAO identified, States recognized 566 Indian tribes. 26 received funding from 24 federal programs during fiscal years 2007 through Federal recognition confers specific 2010. Most of the 26 non-federally recognized tribes were eligible to receive this legal status on tribes and imposes funding either because of their status as nonprofit organizations or state- certain responsibilities on the federal recognized tribes. Similarly, most of the 24 federal programs that awarded government, such as an obligation to funding to non-federally recognized tribes during the 4-year period were provide certain benefits to tribes and authorized to fund nonprofit organizations or state-recognized tribes. In addition, their members. Some tribes are not some of these programs were authorized to fund other entities, such as tribal federally recognized but have qualified communities or community development financial institutions. for and received federal funding. Some of these non-federally recognized For fiscal years 2007 through 2010, 24 federal programs awarded more than tribes are state recognized and may be $100 million to the 26 non-federally recognized tribes. Most of the funding was located on state reservations.
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGES and TOWNS of Nortaampmln COUNTY, VIRGINIA Corn ILLUSTRATION
    EUSTORIC ARl'r SURVEY -, -, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTaAMPMlN COUNTY, VIRGINIA corn ILLUSTRATION Cloeksrise, beginning with the top left: aleriton Freight station, amiton NortbmptonComtyComthouse,EPstville @boto wmksy of the No&aap&a Bco& Fonm A BIacpnW for BEononic Gm&. l992) Bayford Oyster Company, Bayford Lacust Lawn, Shep End HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY SETIUMENTS, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Submitted by: Dames & Moore 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 700 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-652-2215 Submitted to: Department of Historic Resources 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-3143 August 19% The activity that is the subject of this architectural survey has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240 HlSTORIC ARCHlTECTURAL SURVEY SETl'LEMENTS, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA August 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Executive Summary .....................................1-1 3.0 List of Figures and Tables .................................3-1 4.0 Introduction and Description of Survey ..........................4-1 4.1 Project History.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail
    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE BILL 140 F1 1Lr1226 (PRE–FILED) By: Delegate Acevero Requested: October 29, 2020 Introduced and Read First Time: January 13, 2021 Assigned To: Ways and Means
    HOUSE BILL 140 F1 1lr1226 (PRE–FILED) By: Delegate Acevero Requested: October 29, 2020 Introduced and read first time: January 13, 2021 Assigned to: Ways and Means A BILL ENTITLED 1 AN ACT concerning 2 Commission on History, Culture, and Civics in Education 3 FOR the purpose of establishing the Commission on History, Culture, and Civics in 4 Education; providing for the composition, chair, and staffing of the Commission; 5 prohibiting a member of the Commission from receiving certain compensation, but 6 authorizing the reimbursement of certain expenses; requiring the Commission to 7 study and make recommendations regarding certain matters; requiring the 8 Commission to report its findings and recommendations to the State Board of 9 Education, the Governor, and the General Assembly on or before a certain date each 10 year; requiring the State Board to review the Commission’s findings and 11 recommendations and make certain changes to certain educational standards on or 12 before a certain date each year; specifying the terms of the initial members of the 13 Commission; and generally relating to the Commission on History, Culture, and 14 Civics in Education. 15 BY adding to 16 Article – Education 17 Section 7–126 18 Annotated Code of Maryland 19 (2018 Replacement Volume and 2020 Supplement) 20 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 21 That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 22 Article – Education 23 7–126. 24 (A) (1) THERE IS A COMMISSION ON HISTORY, CULTURE, AND CIVICS IN EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW. [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Archaeology and in Promoting Remember, the Weather Last Year Was a Disaster, Archaeology to the General Public
    Winter 2000 KENTUCKYARCHAEOLOGY The Newsletter of the Kentucky Organization of Professional Archaeologists Donald W. Linebaugh, Newsletter Editor, Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, J020A Export St., Lexington, KY 40506 PRESIDENT'S CORNER Lexington. If the weather becomes a problem, this Nancy Ross-Stallings Board and Officers' meeting can be rescheduled fairly quickly. At this meeting, the Board will . It's the end of the year and KyOPA examine the vitae of prospective members, so that elections are upon us. Include with this issue of they can be_voted on by the membership at the the newsletter, is a ballot that I hope you will fill March meeting. An agenda for March will also be out and return as soon as possible. The fine-tuned at this meeting. If KyOPA members Nominations Committee, headed by Don Ball did have agenda items, they should pass them on to a good job of selecting people willing to pick up one of the Board Members or Officers before the 27th the reins and lead KyOPA over the next two to January meeting. three years. As many of you understand, everyone tends to be over-committed and several of the This will be my last President's Comer, as people who were asked to serve had to decline. I my term of office ends next month. I want to have confidence with the slate that has been thank the Vice President, Hank McKelway, for presented; KyOPA will be in good hands. carrying part of the responsibility of leading KyOPA through some eventful times, and to Steve At the KHC Bowling Green meetings Creasman for all of his hard work as earlier this year, the suggestion was made to hold Secretary/Treasurer.
    [Show full text]