VILLAGES and TOWNS of Nortaampmln COUNTY, VIRGINIA Corn ILLUSTRATION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VILLAGES and TOWNS of Nortaampmln COUNTY, VIRGINIA Corn ILLUSTRATION EUSTORIC ARl'r SURVEY -, -, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTaAMPMlN COUNTY, VIRGINIA corn ILLUSTRATION Cloeksrise, beginning with the top left: aleriton Freight station, amiton NortbmptonComtyComthouse,EPstville @boto wmksy of the No&aap&a Bco& Fonm A BIacpnW for BEononic Gm&. l992) Bayford Oyster Company, Bayford Lacust Lawn, Shep End HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY SETIUMENTS, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Submitted by: Dames & Moore 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 700 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-652-2215 Submitted to: Department of Historic Resources 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-3143 August 19% The activity that is the subject of this architectural survey has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240 HlSTORIC ARCHlTECTURAL SURVEY SETl'LEMENTS, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA August 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Executive Summary .....................................1-1 3.0 List of Figures and Tables .................................3-1 4.0 Introduction and Description of Survey ..........................4-1 4.1 Project History. Purpose and Goals ........................4-1 4.2 Project Need .....................................4-2 4.3 Scope of Work ....................................4-2 4.4 SurveyArea ......................................4-3 4.5 Dates of Investigation and Staff Composition ..................4-6 5.0 Historic Context for the Villages. Settlements and Towns of Northampton County. Virginia (Section E of the Multiple Property Documentation Form) .............. 5-1 5.1 Chronological Themes ................................5-2 Settlement to Society (1607-1750) ....................5-2 Colony to Nation (1750-1789) ......................5-6 Early National Period (1789-1830) .................... 5-8 Antebellum Period (1830-1860) ...................... 5-9 Civil War (1861-1865) ..........................5-10 Reconstruction and Growth (1865-1914) ............... 5-11 World War I to Present .........................5-15 5.2 Identifying Themes .................................5-19 Settlement patterns ............................5-19 Domestic ..................................5-23 Subsistence and agriculture .......................5-31 Government. law and politics ...................... 5-35 Education .................................. 5-37 Military and defense ........................... 5-44 Religion ...................................5-50 Industry. processing and extraction- Maritime and Agricultural Industries ............. 5-59 Recreation and arts ............................ 5-63 Transportation and communication ................... 5-66 Commerce and trade ........................... 5-72 Ethnicity and immigration ........................5-77 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 5.3 Geographic Themes: The Towns and Villages of Northampton County . 5-84 6.0 Types of Property in the Villages. Settlements and Towns of Northampton County. Virginia (Section F of the Multiple Property Documentation Form) ......... 6-1 Domestic ........................................6-1 Subsistence and Agriculture ............................6-2 Government. Law and Politics ...........................6-3 Education .......................................6-3 Military and Defense ................................6-4 Religion ........................................6-4 Industry. Processing and Extraction Agricultural and Maritime Industries .......................6-5 Recreation and Arts .................................6-5 Transportation and Communication ........................ 6-6 Commerce and Trade ................................ 67 Ethnicity and Immigration .............................6-8 7.0 Research Design (Section H of the Multiple Property Documentation Form) ..............7-1 7.1 Objectives .......................................7-1 7.2 Survey Methodology ................................. 7-2 7.3 Expected Results ................................... 7-7 8.0 Survey Findings ........................................8-1 9.0 Evaluation ...........................................9-1 9.1 Criteria .........................................9-2 9.2 Integrity ........................................9-3 9.3 Survey Findings of Individual Properties Inventoried at the Intensive Level ..................................9-4 9.4 Survey Findings of Significant Historic Districts ................ 9-7 9.4.1 EastvilleIEastville Station Historic District ........... 9-7 9.4.2 Franktown Historic District ................... 9-11 9.4.3 Oyster Historic District ..................... 9-15 9.4.4 Willis Wharf Historic District ................. 9-18 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 10.0 Recommendations ......................................10-1 10.1 Recommendations for National Register Eligibity ............. 10-1 10.2 Recommendations for Further Survey ..................... 10-1 10.3 Policies and Ordinances that Will Lead to Sustainable Community Development ....................................10-2 11.O Bibliography (Section I of the Multiple Property Documentation Form) ............. 11-1 APPENDICES Appendix A: Completed Multiple Property Documentation Form Cover Appendix B: Address Report Appendix C: Alphabetical Report Appendix D: Numerical Report Appendix E: Style Report Appendix F: Chronological Report Appendix G: Wuzit Report Appendix H. VDHR Historic Context Report Appendix I: Historic Resources Previously Surveyed in Northampton County 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dames & Moore completed an architectural history survey of approximately 300 properties in Northampton County, Virginia. Thirty properties were surveyed at the intensive level; 270 properties were surveyed at the reconnaissance level. Properties were selected to represent a range of chronological themes, identifying themes, and geographic themes. Six villages were identified as potential historic districts -- Cheriton, EastvillelEastville Station, Franktown, Machipongo, Oyster and Willis Wharf. Historic context was developed focusing on the villages, settlements and towns of Northampton County. Chronological themes included: Settlement to Society (1607-1750); Colony to Nation (1750-1789); . Early National Period (1789-1830); Antebellum Period (1830-1860); Civil War (1861-1865); Reconstruction and Growth (1865.1914); and . World War I to Present Settlement patterns comprised the overarching substantive theme of the context. Other identifying themes were: Domestic; . Subsistence and agriculture; Government, law and politics; Education; Military and defeme; . Religion; Industry, processing and extraction-Agricultural and Maritime Industries; Social, recreation and arts; Transportation and communication; Commerce and trade; and Ethnicity and immigration. The geographic theme addressed the various villages, settlements and towns of Northampton County. Each was addressed individually and, where possible, information was supplied about the history and development of each. A preservation ordinance was developed for integration with Northampton County zoning efforts. The ordinance focuses on encouraging incentives for positive preservation. Meetings were held with the Sustainable Development Task Force and with the public to ensure that the efforts meet the needs of the community. 2.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was completed with the assistance, support, and cooperation of the County of Northampton and its citizens. The people who invited us into their homes, shops, and heritage provided a special piece of themselves that we hope is reflected in this report. Dames & Moore is especially indebted to Tim Hayes, Northampton County Director of Sustainable Development, and the Sustainable Development Task Force whose insights and help were invaluable. Special thanks go to Francis Latimer who graciously shared with us her detailed knowledge of Northampton County and her special interest in the African-American heritage of the Shore. Dames & Moore also appreciates the assistance of Mr. Floyd Nock, long-time resident of the Eastern Shore and expert in its architectural history. He provided his intimate knowledge of the people and places of Northampton County. The staff of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources was also extremely helpful throughout this project. In particular, Dames & Moore thanks Margaret Peters, Randy Turner and Elizabeth Hoge Lipford for their detailed review and helpful suggestions for improvement. 3.0 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figures Figure 4.1 . Map of Virginia Locating Northampton County ............... 4-4 Figure 4.2 . Map of the Settlements, Villages and Towns of Northampton County ... 4-5 Figure 5.1 . Parke Hall. Eastville
Recommended publications
  • JAMES CUMMINS BOOKSELLER Catalogue 109 to Place Your Order, Call, Write, E-Mail Or Fax
    JAMES CUMMINS BOOKSELLER catalogue 109 To place your order, call, write, e-mail or fax: JAMES CUMMINS BOOKSELLER 699 Madison Avenue, New York City, 10065 Telephone (212) 688-6441 Fax (212) 688-6192 e-mail: [email protected] www.jamescumminsbookseller.com hours: Monday - Friday 10:00 - 6:00, Saturday 10:00 - 5:00 Members A.B.A.A., I.L.A.B. front cover: Ross, Ambrotype school portraits, item 139 inside front cover: Mason, The Punishments of China, item 102 inside rear cover: Micro-calligraphic manuscript, item 29 rear cover: Steichen, Portrait of Gene Tunney, item 167 terms of payment: All items, as usual, are guaranteed as described and are returnable within 10 days for any reason. All books are shipped UPS (please provide a street address) unless otherwise requested. Overseas orders should specify a shipping preference. All postage is extra. New clients are requested to send remittance with orders. Libraries may apply for deferred billing. All New York and New Jersey residents must add the appropriate sales tax. We accept American Express, Master Card, and Visa. 1. (ANDERSON, Alexander) Bewick, Thomas. A General History of Quadrupeds. The Figures engraved on wood chiefly copied from the original of T. Bewick, by A. Anderson. With an Appendix, containing some American Animals not hitherto described. x, 531 pp. 8vo, New York: Printed by G. & E. Waite, No. 64, Maiden-Lane, 1804. First American edition. Modern half brown morocco and cloth by Sangorski & Sutcliffe. Occasional light spotting, old signature of William S. Barnes on title. Hugo p. 24; S&S 5843; Roscoe, App.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indians of the Chesapeake Bay: an Introduction
    AMERICAN INDIANS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: AN INTRODUCTION hen Captain John Smith sailed up the Chesapeake Bay in 1608, American Indians had W already lived in the area for thousands of years. The people lived off the land by harvesting the natural resources the Bay had to offer. In the spring, thousands of shad, herring and rockfish were netted as they entered the Chesapeake’s rivers and streams to spawn. Summer months were spent tending gardens that produced corn, beans and squash. In the fall, nuts such as acorns, chestnuts and walnuts were gathered from the forest floor. Oysters and clams provided another source of food and were easily gathered from the water at low tide. Hunting parties were sent overland in search of deer, bear, wild turkey and other land animals. Nearby marshes provided wild rice and tuckahoe (arrow arum), which produced a potato-like root. With so much food available, the American Indians of the Chesapeake region were able to thrive. Indian towns were found close to the water’s edge near freshwater springs or streams. Homes were made out of bent saplings (young, Captain John Smith and his exploring party encounter two Indian men green trees) that were tied into a spearing fish in the shallows on the lower Eastern Shore. The Indians framework and covered with woven later led Smith to the village of Accomack, where he met with the chief. mats, tree bark, or animal skins. Villages often had many homes clustered together, and some were built within a palisade, a tall wall built with sturdy sticks and covered with bark, for defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-Sen
    . .,.. - ---- ... ----- 1928 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE 711 Joy Street, Boston, Mass., recommending passage of the Newton the Senate, the unveiling of the Wright Brothers Monument bill, which provides for the creation of a child welfare exten­ at Kitty Hawk, N. C. sion service in the Children's Bureau ; to the Committee on The VICE PRESIDENT. Eighty-one Senators having an­ Education. swered to their names, a quorum is present. 8011. By Mr. YATES : Petition· of Le Seure Bros., jobbers and MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSFi-ENROLLED BILL SIGNED retailers of cigars and tobaccos, Danville, Ohio, protesting Senate bill 2751; to the Committee on Ways and Means. A message from the House of Representatives, by Mr. Halti­ 8012. Also, petition of H. M. Voorhis, of the law offices of gan, one of its clerks, announced that the Speaker had affixed to R. Maguire & Voorhis, of Orlando, Fla., urging passage of the his signature the enrolled bill (H. 13990) to authorize the Sears bill (H. R. 10Z70) ; to the Committee on the Judiciary. President to present the distinguished flying cross to Orville Wright, and to Wilbur Wright, deceased, and it was signed by 8013. Also, petition of W. T. Alden, of the law offices of Alden, the Vice President. Latham & Young, Chicago, Ill., urging passage of Senate bill 3623, amending section 204 of the transportation act of 1920 ; PETITIONS AND MEMOKIALS to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. The VICE PRESIDENT laid before the Senate a petition of 8014. Also, petition of the legislative committee of the Rail­ sundry citizens of St. Petersburg, Fla., praying for the prompt way Mail Association, Illinois Branch, Chicago, urging passage ratification of the so-called Kellogg multilateral treaty for the of the following bills: The retirement bill (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    St Albans and Hertfordshire Architectural AND Archaeological Society TRANSACTIONS 1935 St. Albans: PRINTED BY GIBBS AND BAMFORTH, LTD., SPENCER STREET, 1936 A £ . T1 * w A H >'IX O O 2 o CONTENTS PAGE List of Officers and Council, 1935 232 List of Members, 1935 233 Report for the Year 1935 238 The Society's Library 240 Obituary 242 The Romano-British Cemetery at St. Stephens, near Verulamium. By Norman Davey, B.Sc., Ph.D., A.M.Inst.C.E 243 The Old Bull and Bennetts Butts, Harpenden. By Bernard P. Scattergood, M.A., F.S.A 276 James Bucknall, Third Viscount Grimston. By the Countess of Verulam 293 Verulamium : Insulae XII and XIII. By A. W. G. Lowther, F.S.A., A.R.l.B.A 312 The Stepneth Family of St. Albans and Aldenham Manor, Herts. By H. C. Andrews, M.A., F.S.A 317 Notes 325 Reviews 329 Statement of Accounts for the year 1935 330 THE ST. ALBANS AND HERTFORDSHIRE ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. FOUNDED 1845. OFFICERS AND COUNCIL FOR 1935. Patrons. THE MOST HON. THE MARQUESS OF SALISBURY, K.G., P.C., G.C.V.O., C.B. THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF VERULAM. THE RIGHT REV. THE LORD BISHOP OF ST. ALBANS, D.D. President. THE REV. G. A. GUEST, M.A., B.C.L., LL.D. Vice-Presidents. THE VERY REV. THE DEAN OF ST. ALBANS, M.A. CHARLES E. JONES, ESQ., F.S.A. ERNEST WOOLLEY, ESQ., F.S.A. A. J. B. WACE, ESQ., M.A., F.S.A. GERALD R.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Nanticoke Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of the Legislature of New Jersey
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY FITZGERALD & GOSSON West Ena. x^^^.a Street, SO^ER'^ILLE, .V. J. N. B. BICHAHDSON, GROCERIES AND PROVISIONr West End. Main Street, SOMERl/ILLE, f^. J, r ^(?^ Sfeabe ©i j^ew JeF^ey. MUNUSL ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTH SESSION ^^"^^^ ^^^aRY NEW j: 185 W. ^^t^ £.Lreet Trei COPYRIGHT SECURED. TRENTON, N. J.: Compiled fkom Official Documents and Careful Reseakch, by FITZGERALD & GOSSON, Legislative Reporters. Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1883, by THOMAS F. FITZGERALD AND LOUIS C. GOSSON, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. >§®=" The newspaper press are welcome to use such parts of the work as they may desire, on giving credit therefor to the Manual. INTRODUCTORY THE INIanual of the One Hundred and Eighth Session of the Legislature of New Jersey is, we trust, an improvement on preceding volumes. We have honestly striven every year to make each succeeding book suj^e- rior to all others, and hope, ere long, to present a work which will take rank with the best of its kind published in the United States. To do this we need a continuance of the support heretofore given us, and the official assist- ance of the Legislature. We are confident that this little hand-book, furnished at the small cost of one dollar a volume, is indispensable to every legislator, State official and others, who can, at a moment's notice, refer to it for information of any sort connected with the politics and affairs of State. The vast amount of data, compiled in such a remarkably concise manner, is the result of care- ful research of official documents; and the sketches of the Governor, members of the Judiciary, Congressmen, members of the Legislature, and State officers, are authentic.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report
    Governor’s Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report 2011 Mission Statement The Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs works to serve as a statewide clearinghouse for information; to identify unmet social and economic needs in the native community; to support government education programs for American Indian youth; to provide support in the process of obtaining Recognition of State and Federal Indian Status; and to promote the awareness and understanding of historical and contemporary American Indian contributions in Maryland. 2 Table of Contents Message from the Governor …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Message from the Executive Director, Governor’s Office of Community Initiatives…………….5 Message from the Chair, Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs………………………………………6 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Commissioners……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Commission Meeting Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………………..9 State and Federal Agency Partner Meetings and Events …………………………………………………….10 State Recognition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....11 2011 initiatives…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Outreach………………………………………………………………………………………………................................14 Commissioners in Action…………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Resident Population………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Maryland Indigenous Tribes………………………………………………………………………………………………19 3 STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE 100 STATE Circle ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Tour of Townsend Mansion, Home of the Cosmos
    NOTES FOR TOUR OF TOWNSEND MANSION HOME OF THE COSMOS CLUB July 2015 Harvey Alter (CC: 1970) Editor Updated: Jean Taylor Federico (CC: 1992), Betty C. Monkman (CC: 2004), FOREWORD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These notes are for docent training, both background and possible speaking text for a walking tour of the Club. The material is largely taken from notes prepared by Bill Hall (CC: 1995) in 2000, Ed Bowles (CC: 1973) in 2004, and Judy Holoviak (CC: 1999) in 2004 to whom grateful credit is given. Many of the details are from Wilcomb Washburn’s centennial history of the Club. The material on Jules Allard is from the research of Paul Miller, curator of the Newport Preservation Society. The material was assembled by Jack Mansfield (CC: 1998), to whom thanks are given. Members Jean Taylor Federico and Betty Monkman with curatorial assistant, Peggy Newman updated the tour and added references to notable objects and paintings in the Cosmos Club collection in August, 2009. This material was revised in 2010 and 2013 to note location changes. Assistance has been provided by our Associate Curators: Leslie Jones, Maggie Dimmock, and Yve Colby. Acknowledgement is made of the comprehensive report on the historic structures of the Townsend Mansion by Denys Peter Myers (CC: 1977), 1990 rev. 1993. The notes are divided into two parts. The first is an overview of the Club’s history. The second part is tour background. The portion in bold is recommended as speaking notes for tour guides followed by information that will be useful for elaboration and answering questions. The notes are organized by floor, room and section of the Club, not necessarily in the order tours may take.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 2003
    National Register of Historic Places 2003 Weekly Lists January 3, 2003 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 10, 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 7 January 17, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 11 January 24, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 14 January 31, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 16 February 7, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 18 February 14, 2003 ....................................................................................................................................... 19 February 21, 2003 ....................................................................................................................................... 22 February 28, 2003 ....................................................................................................................................... 24 March 7, 2003 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2017, London
    London Register 2017 HERITAGE AT RISK 2017 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 18 Croydon 20 Ealing 23 Enfield 26 Greenwich 29 Hackney 33 Hammersmith and Fulham 39 Haringey 42 Harrow 46 Havering 49 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 63 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 80 Lambeth 81 Lewisham 90 London Legacy (MDC) 94 Merton 95 Newham 100 Redbridge 102 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 107 Sutton 115 Tower Hamlets 116 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2017 he Heritage at Risk Register is a tool to help understand the ‘health’ of London’s historic environment. It includes buildings and sites known to be at risk from T neglect, decay or inappropriate development, helping to focus advice and support where it’s most needed. In London there are 683 sites on our Heritage at Risk Register – everything from the remains of a medieval moated manor house in Bromley, to a 1950s concrete sculpture on the Great West Road. Finding solutions to these sites isn’t easy, but we’re grateful for the support of all those who work tirelessly to protect our historic environment. Your efforts have helped to secure the future of 96% of buildings that appeared in our first published Register in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Partners: a History of Piscataway Park
    Preservation and Partners: A History of Piscataway Park Janet A. McDonnell, PhD December 2020 Resource Stewardship and Science, National Capital Area, National Park Service and Organization of American Historians EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the early republic period of American history, President George Washington was the most renowned resident of the Potomac River valley. His sprawling Mount Vernon estate sat on a hill directly across the Potomac River from the 17th century Marshall Hall estate in Maryland. There is ample evidence that Washington and his guests enjoyed and very much appreciated the stunning view. Many years later preserving this view would become the major impetus for establishing what we know today as Piscataway Park (PISC), a few miles south of Washington, DC. These lands along the Maryland shore of Potomac River were actively cultivated during George Washington’s time, and the existing park setting, which includes agricultural lands and open spaces interspersed with forests and wetlands, closely approximates that historic scene. The National Park Service’s (NPS) primary goal and responsibility in managing the park has been, and continues to be, preserving this historic scene of open fields and wooded areas and ensuring that it does not authorize any landscape alterations except those that would restore previously undisturbed sites, reduce visual intrusions, or maintain open fields. The NPS continues to take into account the slope and orientation of the terrain and the tree cover when considering the location of any new facilities. Piscataway Park and its associated lands are for the most part held under scenic easements and constitute a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) historic district made up of nearly 5,000 acres of meadow, woodland, and wetland, along six miles of the Potomac River shoreline from the head of Piscataway Creek to the historic Marshall Hall in Maryland’s Prince George’s and Charles counties.
    [Show full text]
  • American Tri-Racials
    DISSERTATIONEN DER LMU 43 RENATE BARTL American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America We People: Multi-Ethnic Indigenous Nations and Multi- Ethnic Groups Claiming Indian Ancestry in the Eastern United States Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München vorgelegt von Renate Bartl aus Mainburg 2017 Erstgutachter: Prof. Berndt Ostendorf Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Eveline Dürr Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.02.2018 Renate Bartl American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America Dissertationen der LMU München Band 43 American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America by Renate Bartl Herausgegeben von der Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München Mit Open Publishing LMU unterstützt die Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München alle Wissenschaft ler innen und Wissenschaftler der LMU dabei, ihre Forschungsergebnisse parallel gedruckt und digital zu veröfentlichen. Text © Renate Bartl 2020 Erstveröfentlichung 2021 Zugleich Dissertation der LMU München 2017 Bibliografsche Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografe; detaillierte bibliografsche Daten sind im Internet abrufbar über http://dnb.dnb.de Herstellung über: readbox unipress in der readbox publishing GmbH Rheinische Str. 171 44147 Dortmund http://unipress.readbox.net Open-Access-Version dieser Publikation verfügbar unter: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-268747 978-3-95925-170-9 (Druckausgabe) 978-3-95925-171-6 (elektronische Version) Contents List of Maps ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]