DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 Regular Session of the General Assembly on the Small Business Community.”;

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2008 Regular Session of the General Assembly on the Small Business Community.”; JOURNAL of PROCEEDINGS of the SENATE of MARYLAND REGULAR SESSION, 2008 VOLUME II Library and Information Services and Legislative Document Management of the Department of Legislative Services General Assembly of Maryland prepared this document. For further information concerning this document contact: Library and Information Services Office of Policy Analysis Department of Legislative Services 90 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Baltimore Area: (410-946-5400) Washington Area: (301-970-5400) Other Areas: (1-800-492-7122) TTY: (410-946-5401) (301-970-5401) TTY users may also call the Maryland Relay Service to contact the General Assembly. E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://mlis.state.md.us The Department of Legislative Services does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or disability in the admission or access to its programs or activities. The Department's Information Officer has been designated to coordinate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.107 of the Department of Justice Regulations. Requests for assistance should be directed to the Information Officer at Library and Information Services of the Department of Legislative Services. 2008 SENATE JOURNAL INDEX OF DAYS Legislative Day Page Legislative Day Page January 9…………………….…...……...1 February 27……………………………....973 January 10………………………..…….76 February 28……………….......……….…984 January 11………………………..…….84 February 29……………..………………1013 January 14……………………..……….93 March 3……………………..…………..1046 January 15……………………….........104 March 4…………………………..……..1097 January 16………………………….....109 March 5……………………….…….…..1117 January 17………………………….....131 March 6……………………..………..…1140 January 18………………………….....143 March 7………………………………....1163 January 22………………………….....210 March 10……………………………..…1242 January 23………………………....….214 March 11……………………………..…1316 January 24……………………..…..….241 March 12………………………………..1376 January 25……………………....…….258 March 13………………………………..1444 January 28………………..……..…….275 March 14………………………………..1500 January 29……………………..…...…307 March 17………………………………..1565 January 30……………………..…..….310 March 18………………………………..1637 January 31……………………..…..….338 March 19………………………………..1681 February 1…………………………….392 March 20………………………………..1784 February 5………………………….…624 March 21………………………………..1964 February 6…………………………….640 March 22……………………………..…2230 February 7……………………....…….651 March 23……………………………..…2432 February 8…………………………….672 March 24……………………………..…2489 February 11…………………….….….694 March 25………………………………..2531 February 12………………..….…...….714 March 26……………………………..…2604 February 13……………………....…...723 March 27………………………………..2727 February 14…………………..….....…748 March 28……………………………..…2760 February 15…………………….......…777 March 29………………………………..2813 February 18……………………...…....813 March 30………………………………..2882 February 19…………………………...857 March 31…………………………….….3013 February 20…………………….......…872 April 1…………………………………..3081 February 21…………………..….....…891 April 2…………………………………..3184 February 22…………………..……….908 April 3………………………………..…3444 February 25……………...……………937 April 4…………………………………..3530 February 26…………………….....…..960 April 5………………………………..…3615 iii Feb. 18, 2008 Senate of Maryland 813 Annapolis, Maryland Monday, February 18, 2008 8:00 P.M. Session The Senate met at 8:06 P.M. Prayer by The Reverend Marc Norman, Grace Community Church, guest of Senator Robey. (For Prayer see Exhibit A of Appendix III) The Journal of February 15, 2008 was read and approved. QUORUM CALL The presiding officer announced a quorum call, showing 47 Members present. (See Roll Call No. 196) INTRODUCTION OF BILLS Senate Bill 888 – Senators Lenett, Harrington, King, Madaleno, Pugh, Raskin, and Rosapepe AN ACT concerning Higher Education – Maryland Biotechnology Scholarship Program FOR the purpose of establishing the Maryland Biotechnology Scholarship Program; authorizing the Maryland Higher Education Commission to make scholarship awards, not to exceed a certain amount per recipient, that may be used at certain institutions of higher education for certain purposes; requiring a scholarship recipient to meet certain eligibility criteria to obtain and retain an award; requiring a recipient to sign an agreement that on graduation the recipient will commence employment in a certain field within a certain period or else repay the State the amount of the scholarship award; establishing a certain scholarship fund to receive money and other property; providing that it is the intent of the General Assembly that certain higher education institutions form relationships with employers in a certain sector; and generally relating to the establishment of the Maryland Biotechnology Scholarship Program for students studying to pursue a career in a biotechnology–related field. 814 Journal of Proceedings Feb. 18, 2008 BY adding to Article – Education Section 18–2801 through 18–2807 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 28. Maryland Biotechnology Scholarship Program” Annotated Code of Maryland (2006 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) Read the first time and referred to the Committee on Rules. Senate Bill 889 – Senator Dyson AN ACT concerning Nurse Practitioners – Authority to Certify FOR the purpose of authorizing certain nurse practitioners to make a certain determination of incapacity or debilitation under certain circumstances; requiring a certain nurse practitioner to provide a copy of a certain determination to a certain standby guardian; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to certify that a certain minor is pregnant or has given birth under certain circumstances; authorizing certain nurse practitioners or certain nurse midwives to provide certain information about the birth of a child for purposes of filing a birth certificate; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to complete and sign a certain death certificate under certain circumstances; requiring certain nurse practitioners who complete a certain death certificate to give or transmit the certificate to a certain mortician within a certain period of time; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to serve as a witness to a certain advance directive under certain circumstances; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to issue a certain oral emergency medical services “do not resuscitate order” under certain circumstances; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to conduct a certain examination for purposes of a certain involuntary admission; requiring the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene to pay for a certain examination conducted by a certain nurse practitioner; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to conduct certain educational training programs for applicants for certification for the Insect Sting Emergency Treatment Program; authorizing certain nurse practitioners to certify that certain applicants for assignment of a certain special disability registration number or plates to a certain vehicle have certain conditions; defining certain terms; and generally relating to the certifying authority of nurse practitioners. BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article – Estates and Trusts Section 13–906 Annotated Code of Maryland (2001 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) Feb. 18, 2008 Senate of Maryland 815 BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article – Family Law Section 2–301 Annotated Code of Maryland (2006 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article – Health – General Section 4–208(a), 4–212, 5–601(h) and (o) through (q), 5–602(c) through (e), 5–608(c), 10–616(a), 10–628, and 13–704 Annotated Code of Maryland (2005 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, Article – Health – General Section 5–601(a), 5–602(a), and 13–701 Annotated Code of Maryland (2005 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) BY adding to Article – Health – General Section 5–601(o) Annotated Code of Maryland (2005 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article – Transportation Section 13–616(a) and (b) Annotated Code of Maryland (2006 Replacement Volume and 2007 Supplement) Read the first time and referred to the Committee on Rules. Senate Bill 890 – Senator Jones AN ACT concerning Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2006 – Baltimore City – Gay Street One/Madison Square FOR the purpose of amending the Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2006 to extend the deadline by which the Board of Directors of the East Baltimore Community Corporation may present evidence to the Board of Public Works that a matching fund will be provided; and making a technical change. BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Chapter 46 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2006 816 Journal of Proceedings Feb. 18, 2008 Section 1(3) Item ZA01(V) Read the first time and referred to the Committee on Rules. Senate Bill 891 – Senator Peters AN ACT concerning Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2007 – Prince George’s County – Reid Community Business Development Center FOR the purpose of amending the Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2007 to change the location of the Reid Community Business Development Center. BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Chapter 488 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2007 Section 1(3) Item ZA01(BD) and ZA02(BT) Read the first time and referred to the Committee on Rules. Senate Bill 892 – Senator Stoltzfus AN ACT concerning Creation of a State Debt – Somerset County – Bending Water Park FOR the purpose of authorizing the creation of a State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Indians of the Chesapeake Bay: an Introduction
    AMERICAN INDIANS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: AN INTRODUCTION hen Captain John Smith sailed up the Chesapeake Bay in 1608, American Indians had W already lived in the area for thousands of years. The people lived off the land by harvesting the natural resources the Bay had to offer. In the spring, thousands of shad, herring and rockfish were netted as they entered the Chesapeake’s rivers and streams to spawn. Summer months were spent tending gardens that produced corn, beans and squash. In the fall, nuts such as acorns, chestnuts and walnuts were gathered from the forest floor. Oysters and clams provided another source of food and were easily gathered from the water at low tide. Hunting parties were sent overland in search of deer, bear, wild turkey and other land animals. Nearby marshes provided wild rice and tuckahoe (arrow arum), which produced a potato-like root. With so much food available, the American Indians of the Chesapeake region were able to thrive. Indian towns were found close to the water’s edge near freshwater springs or streams. Homes were made out of bent saplings (young, Captain John Smith and his exploring party encounter two Indian men green trees) that were tied into a spearing fish in the shallows on the lower Eastern Shore. The Indians framework and covered with woven later led Smith to the village of Accomack, where he met with the chief. mats, tree bark, or animal skins. Villages often had many homes clustered together, and some were built within a palisade, a tall wall built with sturdy sticks and covered with bark, for defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Nanticoke Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report
    Governor’s Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report 2011 Mission Statement The Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs works to serve as a statewide clearinghouse for information; to identify unmet social and economic needs in the native community; to support government education programs for American Indian youth; to provide support in the process of obtaining Recognition of State and Federal Indian Status; and to promote the awareness and understanding of historical and contemporary American Indian contributions in Maryland. 2 Table of Contents Message from the Governor …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Message from the Executive Director, Governor’s Office of Community Initiatives…………….5 Message from the Chair, Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs………………………………………6 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Commissioners……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Commission Meeting Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………………..9 State and Federal Agency Partner Meetings and Events …………………………………………………….10 State Recognition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....11 2011 initiatives…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Outreach………………………………………………………………………………………………................................14 Commissioners in Action…………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Resident Population………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Maryland Indigenous Tribes………………………………………………………………………………………………19 3 STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE 100 STATE Circle ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Partners: a History of Piscataway Park
    Preservation and Partners: A History of Piscataway Park Janet A. McDonnell, PhD December 2020 Resource Stewardship and Science, National Capital Area, National Park Service and Organization of American Historians EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the early republic period of American history, President George Washington was the most renowned resident of the Potomac River valley. His sprawling Mount Vernon estate sat on a hill directly across the Potomac River from the 17th century Marshall Hall estate in Maryland. There is ample evidence that Washington and his guests enjoyed and very much appreciated the stunning view. Many years later preserving this view would become the major impetus for establishing what we know today as Piscataway Park (PISC), a few miles south of Washington, DC. These lands along the Maryland shore of Potomac River were actively cultivated during George Washington’s time, and the existing park setting, which includes agricultural lands and open spaces interspersed with forests and wetlands, closely approximates that historic scene. The National Park Service’s (NPS) primary goal and responsibility in managing the park has been, and continues to be, preserving this historic scene of open fields and wooded areas and ensuring that it does not authorize any landscape alterations except those that would restore previously undisturbed sites, reduce visual intrusions, or maintain open fields. The NPS continues to take into account the slope and orientation of the terrain and the tree cover when considering the location of any new facilities. Piscataway Park and its associated lands are for the most part held under scenic easements and constitute a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) historic district made up of nearly 5,000 acres of meadow, woodland, and wetland, along six miles of the Potomac River shoreline from the head of Piscataway Creek to the historic Marshall Hall in Maryland’s Prince George’s and Charles counties.
    [Show full text]
  • American Tri-Racials
    DISSERTATIONEN DER LMU 43 RENATE BARTL American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America We People: Multi-Ethnic Indigenous Nations and Multi- Ethnic Groups Claiming Indian Ancestry in the Eastern United States Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München vorgelegt von Renate Bartl aus Mainburg 2017 Erstgutachter: Prof. Berndt Ostendorf Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Eveline Dürr Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.02.2018 Renate Bartl American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America Dissertationen der LMU München Band 43 American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America by Renate Bartl Herausgegeben von der Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München Mit Open Publishing LMU unterstützt die Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München alle Wissenschaft ler innen und Wissenschaftler der LMU dabei, ihre Forschungsergebnisse parallel gedruckt und digital zu veröfentlichen. Text © Renate Bartl 2020 Erstveröfentlichung 2021 Zugleich Dissertation der LMU München 2017 Bibliografsche Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografe; detaillierte bibliografsche Daten sind im Internet abrufbar über http://dnb.dnb.de Herstellung über: readbox unipress in der readbox publishing GmbH Rheinische Str. 171 44147 Dortmund http://unipress.readbox.net Open-Access-Version dieser Publikation verfügbar unter: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-268747 978-3-95925-170-9 (Druckausgabe) 978-3-95925-171-6 (elektronische Version) Contents List of Maps ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pocomoke Nation
    Page 1 of 2 THE POCOMOKE NATION Website: www.pocomokeindiannation.org email: [email protected] BACKGROUND The Pocomoke is one of several indigenous nations who called present-day Delmarva their home. Its people were culturally aligned with the Algonquian language family and regionally identified as a Northeastern Woodland group. It is likely the Pocomoke had prehistoric roots to the Shawnee, an Algonquin group who traditionally considered the Lenape as “their grandfathers.” Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 observed the native people on the Assateague peninsula. In 1649 Norwood’s ship became stranded off the coast and he and a party of men rowed ashore and requested assistance from the natives to reach the western shore and the English settlement at Jamestown. In 1608 Captain John Smith explored the eastern shore of the Chesapeake Bay and visited a palisaded town and King’s house on the Wighco Flu, now known as the Pocomoke River. According to Capt. Smith these People and its northern neighbor, the Nanticoke, spoke a different dialect than the Accomac and Accohannock groups who he noted were politically and culturally associated with the Powhatan Empire across the Chesapeake Bay. Verrazano’s observations, Norwood’s detailed account and Smith’s journals present an early view of Pocomoke hospitality to strangers and a window in its culture prior to English colonization. SUBTRIBES & TOWNS Early records identify the sub-tribes of the Pocomoke Paramountcy as Annemessee, Acquintica, Gingoteague, Manoakin, Monie, Morumsco, Nusswattux, Pocomoke and Quandanquan, and its towns and villages as Askiminokansen, Arrococo, Monie, Manoakin, Parahockin, and Wighcocomoco. TERRITORY The Pocomoke paramount chiefdom and territory ran from the Chesapeake Bay to the confluence of the Nanticoke and Wicomico rivers, then northeasterly to the Ocean, encompassing forests, swamps, coastal bays and seaside islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide – First Inquiry
    dawnland TEACHER’S GUIDE – FIRST INQUIRY BY DR. MISHY LESSER A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT CULTURAL SURVIVAL AND STOLEN CHILDREN BY ADAM MAZO AND BEN PENDER-CUDLIP COPYRIGHT © 2019 MISHY LESSER AND UPSTANDER FILMS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS DAWNLAND TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................3 B. PREPARING TO TEACH DAWNLAND .................................................................................................................17 C. THE COMPELLING QUESTION TO SUPPORT INQUIRY .........................................................................................22 D. FIRST INQUIRY: FROM TURTLE ISLAND TO THE AMERICAS ...................................................................................24 The First Inquiry spans millennia, beginning tens of thousands of years ago and ending in the eighteenth century with scalp proclamations that targeted Native people for elimination. Many important moments, events, documents, sources, and voices were left out of the lessons you are about to read because they can be accessed elsewhere. We encourage teachers to consult and use the excellent resources developed by Tribal educators, such as: • Since Time Immemorial: Tribal Sovereignty in Washington State • Indian Education for All (Montana) • Haudenosaunee Guide for Educators Lesson 1: The peopling of Turtle Island ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Honorable Dan Boren, GAO House of Representatives April 2012 INDIAN ISSUES Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes GAO-12-348 April 2012 INDIAN ISSUES Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes Highlights of GAO-12-348, a report to the Honorable Dan Boren, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found As of January 3, 2012, the United Of the approximately 400 non-federally recognized tribes that GAO identified, States recognized 566 Indian tribes. 26 received funding from 24 federal programs during fiscal years 2007 through Federal recognition confers specific 2010. Most of the 26 non-federally recognized tribes were eligible to receive this legal status on tribes and imposes funding either because of their status as nonprofit organizations or state- certain responsibilities on the federal recognized tribes. Similarly, most of the 24 federal programs that awarded government, such as an obligation to funding to non-federally recognized tribes during the 4-year period were provide certain benefits to tribes and authorized to fund nonprofit organizations or state-recognized tribes. In addition, their members. Some tribes are not some of these programs were authorized to fund other entities, such as tribal federally recognized but have qualified communities or community development financial institutions. for and received federal funding. Some of these non-federally recognized For fiscal years 2007 through 2010, 24 federal programs awarded more than tribes are state recognized and may be $100 million to the 26 non-federally recognized tribes. Most of the funding was located on state reservations.
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGES and TOWNS of Nortaampmln COUNTY, VIRGINIA Corn ILLUSTRATION
    EUSTORIC ARl'r SURVEY -, -, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTaAMPMlN COUNTY, VIRGINIA corn ILLUSTRATION Cloeksrise, beginning with the top left: aleriton Freight station, amiton NortbmptonComtyComthouse,EPstville @boto wmksy of the No&aap&a Bco& Fonm A BIacpnW for BEononic Gm&. l992) Bayford Oyster Company, Bayford Lacust Lawn, Shep End HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY SETIUMENTS, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Submitted by: Dames & Moore 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 700 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-652-2215 Submitted to: Department of Historic Resources 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-3143 August 19% The activity that is the subject of this architectural survey has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240 HlSTORIC ARCHlTECTURAL SURVEY SETl'LEMENTS, VILLAGES AND TOWNS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA August 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Executive Summary .....................................1-1 3.0 List of Figures and Tables .................................3-1 4.0 Introduction and Description of Survey ..........................4-1 4.1 Project History.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail
    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE BILL 140 F1 1Lr1226 (PRE–FILED) By: Delegate Acevero Requested: October 29, 2020 Introduced and Read First Time: January 13, 2021 Assigned To: Ways and Means
    HOUSE BILL 140 F1 1lr1226 (PRE–FILED) By: Delegate Acevero Requested: October 29, 2020 Introduced and read first time: January 13, 2021 Assigned to: Ways and Means A BILL ENTITLED 1 AN ACT concerning 2 Commission on History, Culture, and Civics in Education 3 FOR the purpose of establishing the Commission on History, Culture, and Civics in 4 Education; providing for the composition, chair, and staffing of the Commission; 5 prohibiting a member of the Commission from receiving certain compensation, but 6 authorizing the reimbursement of certain expenses; requiring the Commission to 7 study and make recommendations regarding certain matters; requiring the 8 Commission to report its findings and recommendations to the State Board of 9 Education, the Governor, and the General Assembly on or before a certain date each 10 year; requiring the State Board to review the Commission’s findings and 11 recommendations and make certain changes to certain educational standards on or 12 before a certain date each year; specifying the terms of the initial members of the 13 Commission; and generally relating to the Commission on History, Culture, and 14 Civics in Education. 15 BY adding to 16 Article – Education 17 Section 7–126 18 Annotated Code of Maryland 19 (2018 Replacement Volume and 2020 Supplement) 20 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 21 That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 22 Article – Education 23 7–126. 24 (A) (1) THERE IS A COMMISSION ON HISTORY, CULTURE, AND CIVICS IN EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW. [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Archaeology and in Promoting Remember, the Weather Last Year Was a Disaster, Archaeology to the General Public
    Winter 2000 KENTUCKYARCHAEOLOGY The Newsletter of the Kentucky Organization of Professional Archaeologists Donald W. Linebaugh, Newsletter Editor, Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, J020A Export St., Lexington, KY 40506 PRESIDENT'S CORNER Lexington. If the weather becomes a problem, this Nancy Ross-Stallings Board and Officers' meeting can be rescheduled fairly quickly. At this meeting, the Board will . It's the end of the year and KyOPA examine the vitae of prospective members, so that elections are upon us. Include with this issue of they can be_voted on by the membership at the the newsletter, is a ballot that I hope you will fill March meeting. An agenda for March will also be out and return as soon as possible. The fine-tuned at this meeting. If KyOPA members Nominations Committee, headed by Don Ball did have agenda items, they should pass them on to a good job of selecting people willing to pick up one of the Board Members or Officers before the 27th the reins and lead KyOPA over the next two to January meeting. three years. As many of you understand, everyone tends to be over-committed and several of the This will be my last President's Comer, as people who were asked to serve had to decline. I my term of office ends next month. I want to have confidence with the slate that has been thank the Vice President, Hank McKelway, for presented; KyOPA will be in good hands. carrying part of the responsibility of leading KyOPA through some eventful times, and to Steve At the KHC Bowling Green meetings Creasman for all of his hard work as earlier this year, the suggestion was made to hold Secretary/Treasurer.
    [Show full text]