Status of the Danish Breeding Population of Eiders Somateria Mollissima 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status of the Danish Breeding Population of Eiders Somateria Mollissima 2010 Status of the Danish breeding population of Eiders Somateria mollissima 2010 Thomas Kjær ChrisTensen & Thomas BregnBalle (Med et dansk resumé: Status over den danske ynglebestand af Ederfugl Somateria mollissima 2010) Introduction found in open-water areas, where the majority of The Danish breeding population of Eiders Somate- the Danish breeding population was found during ria mollissima has increased considerably during the the previous decades (see Lyngs 2000, 2008). 20th century. Around 1935 there was an estimated During the 1990s the total Baltic/Wadden Sea 1500 nesting females (Spärck 1936), whereas na- flyway population of Eiders has shown a marked tionwide surveys around 1990 and 2000 revealed decline of approx. 35% when assessed from surveys totals of c. 25000 breeding pairs (Lyngs 2000, 2008). of the wintering population (Desholm et al. 2002). As also evident in the Baltic (cf. Desholm et al. However, apparently the total breeding numbers 2002), the increase in the Danish Eider population throughout this flyway remained unchanged dur- was most marked during the 1970s, with national ing the same period, which led Desholm et al. (op. estimates of 7500 around 1970 (Joensen 1973) and cit.) to suggest, as one among other hypotheses, 19000–20000 around 1980 (Franzmann 1989). Du- that the breeding population upheld its numbers ring the 1990s, the total number of breeding Eiders owing to supplementary recruitment from a hith- in Denmark remained stable, whereas changes in erto non-breeding population segment, which as colony distribution and dynamics occurred, with a special case could also include earlier first-time relatively high growth rates observed in fjords and breeding. However, in a continuously declining sheltered, shallow water areas, while declines were population, depletion of a non-breeding segment Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 105 (2011): 195-205 196 The Danish population of Eiders would eventually lead to declines in breeding num- Male counts were applied at several sites with bers. Such declines in breeding numbers seem to the aim of estimating breeding numbers from the have occurred recently in both Sweden (M. Gren number of (paired) adult males observed attending unplub. data) and Finland (Ekroos et al. in press). As breeding colonies during the prebreeding or early a segment of the Baltic/Wadden Sea flyway popula- incubation period. Male counts allowed collection tion, the Danish Eider population would potentially of data from sites sensitive to disturbance from be subject to a similar developmental pattern fol- nest counting activity, and from sites where access lowing the stable situation. permits could not be obtained, e.g., some privately The present paper presents a status of the Dan- owned islands. Male counts were made from small ish breeding population in 2010 and discusses the boats or from adjacent mainland coasts and includ- most recent changes in distribution and breeding ed all adult males present within a 200-300 m zone numbers at selected sites. It also addresses the na- around known or potential breeding sites (islands, tional status in relation to the recent changes in the islets, peninsulas). Immature males and groups of flyway population in general. males recorded at larger distances from the breed- ing sites were counted separately, and were not in- cluded in the estimates of breeding numbers. Male Material and methods counts were generally performed in April or early A nationwide survey covering (almost all) known in May; in parts of Sydfynske Øhav, Kattegat and and potential breeding sites of Eiders was organised Smålandsfarvandet they were conducted as aerial by the Danish National Environmental Research In- surveys, performed from a twin-engine aircraft fly- stitute, Aarhus University (NERI) in 2010. For practi- ing at an altitude of 250 feet. cal reasons, some sites were surveyed before 2010. A total of 223 sites (covering 229 single localities) The two important breeding sites Stavns Fjord at were surveyed for breeding Eiders (2 in 2007, 6 in Samsø, and Saltholm, were covered in 2007 and 2008, 26 in 2009, 188 in 2010, and a single site – Nor- 2008, respectively. For the majority of sites in Syd- dre Rønner (Kattegat) – in 2011). A total of 49 sites fynske Øhav we use data collected during a survey were covered only by male counts, 154 sites were in 2009 (Bisschop-Larsen 2009). The vast majority of covered only by nest counts, while 20 sites were other localities were covered in 2010. The surveys covered both by nest and male counts. Male counts in 2009-2010 involved counts carried out by volun- were performed between 13 April and 16 May, with tary ornithologists, the Danish Hunters Association the majority (n = 47) carried out between 13 April (Christensen 2010) and personnel from the Nation- and 3 May (Fig. 2). Nest counts covered a longer time al Forest and Nature Agency (see Acknowledge- period than male counts, ranging from 24 April to 22 ments), who all reported their results back to NERI. June. Some sites do not have a count date, as they For a few additional sites, supplementary data from were covered several times during April and May, 2009-2010 were extracted from the observation while a few counts were reported without dating. database, DOFbasen, hosted by BirdLife Denmark. The present survey included 64 localities that had In the following, 2010 refers to the present survey not been covered by the surveys in 1990 and 2000, covering the period 2007-2010, while 1990 refers to whereas 13 previously surveyed sites were not cov- the survey carried out during 1988-1993, and 2000 ered. refers to the 2000-2002 survey. In calculating the number of breeding Eiders at The number of breeding Eider females was es- a given site, we used the most recent and robust timated for each site based on either nest counts counts, with nest counts taking precedence over or male counts. Nest counts were performed by male counts. At sites covered by nest counts more visiting breeding sites during the breeding season, than once in the same year, we used data collected and included recordings of the number of incubat- in May, preferentially in early May. ing females and nests that were either hatched or To calculate nest numbers from male counts, we deserted. Field personnel were asked to describe used a correction factor to adjust for the expected site coverage and to make on-site assessments of presence of non-paired adult males around the the minimum and maximum number of breeding breeding colonies. This factor was obtained from Eiders in the total area. Notes should likewise be analysing the relationship between male counts made on the presence/absence of predators, e.g., and nest counts carried out separately at 20 sites in fox, martens and mink, which could influence the 2010. These data showed a highly significant rela- number of breeding birds. tionship between numbers of adult males and nests The Danish population of Eiders 197 Fig. 2. The temporal distribution of male and nest counts. The male counts include the counts at 20 sites also cov- Fig. 1. Relationship between nest numbers and numbers ered by nest counts. of adult males recorded at separate counts at 20 breeding Den tidsmæssige fordeling af han-tællinger og rede-tællin- sites in 2010. ger. Han-tællingerne omfatter 20 lokaliteter, hvor der også Forholdet mellem antallet af adulte ederfuglehanner og blev optalt reder. antallet af reder registreret ved separate tællinger på 20 ynglelokaliteter i 2010. 2 (r = 0.931, F18,1 = 242, P < 0.0001), revealing an aver- survey – with the inclusion of male counts – could age of 0.68 nest per recorded male (95% confidence lead to an overestimation of the actual population. interval 0.59-0.77; Fig. 1). Consequently, the correction was applied solely to At a few sites the number of breeding Eiders was the numbers obtained from nest counts, using the assessed from observations of females accompany- conservative factor of 1.15. ing young. In each case, it was assessed whether the group could come from other colonies in the region, and hence not represent local breeding birds. For Results some observations reported to DOFbasen it could Calculated from the maximum breeding numbers not be excluded that the birds originated from assessed by observers, the total number of breeding other known breeding sites in the region, and such Eider pairs recorded during the 2010 survey was observations were not included in the population 22185 (18589 nest recordings and 3596 [95% c.i. estimate. 3110-4082] nests estimated from male counts). The In general nest counts were performed as total corresponding total based on the minimum num- counts, but for a few sites the total number of nests ber of directly observed nests was 21561. Nests re- was obtained by correcting counted numbers ac- cordings constituted c. 83% of the total, while the cording to the observer’s notes on site coverage. remaining 17% were based on male counts. More than half (52%) of the nest counts were per- The result of the 2010 survey is similar to the esti- formed during the optimal time period between 1 mates from 1990 and 2000 (Table 1), indicating that and 15 May, and 78% were counted at some time the Eider population has been stable during the during this month (Fig. 2). On the 13.5 km2 large past two decades. In accordance with this stability, island of Saltholm (Øresund), nest counts were per- the calculated growth rate of the population is very formed as special transect counts: a total of seven small (-0.3% for 1990-2000, -0.2% for 2000-2010; see evenly spaced east-west oriented transects (45 m Table 1). During the 2010 survey, breeding Eiders wide) was fully surveyed, covering 5.4% of the to- were recorded at 188 sites, of which 45 had no previ- tal area, and total nest numbers were obtained by ous record of the species.
Recommended publications
  • GODE STEDER for JOLLESEJLERE K 7 BØGESTRØMMEN
    K 7 Bøgestrøm s. 1 GODE STEDER for JOLLESEJLERE K 7 BØGESTRØMMEN SILDEN af Hornbæk. Pokalsejlads v. Snekkersten 2009. Per Stigbolt ved roret. TRÆSKIBS SAMMENSLUTNINGEN * ULF BRAMMER 2014 ISSN 0905-1635 K 7 Bøgestrøm s. 2 INDHOLD 0 INDLEDNING SØKORT NR OMFATTER 1 KATTEGAT N for Sjæll. 129 Sjællands Odde-Hundested-Gilleleje 2 ISEFJORDEN 116 – 117 - 118 Holbæk Fjord - Roskilde Fjord 3 SUNDET N 131 Gilleleje - Helsingør - Tårbæk - Sverige 4 KBH. HAVN 133 – 134 Bellevue - Kbh. – Avedøre – Sverige 5 SUNDET S 132 Avedøre - Køge - Stevns Klint – Sverige 6 FAXE BUGT 190 Rødvig - Præstø Fjord - Jungshoved 7 BØGESTRØMMEN 161- 162 Stege Bugt–Ulvsund-Storstrømmen 8 GRØNSUND & MØN 161-162-198 Grønsund – Møn - Hesnæs 9 SW SJÆLLAND 160 Masnedø – Karrebæk – Næstved 164 Bisserup – Omø – Agersø-Korsør 10 STOREBÆLT- N 141 Korsør – Reersø – Kalundborg Fjord 11 SEJERØ BUGT 128 Røsnæs – Nekselø – Sejerø – Sj. Odde 12 SMÅLANDSFARV. 160 Lolland N – Askø – Femø – Fejø Syd 142 Kragenæs – Onsevig – Tårs Fiskerihavn 13 GULDBORGSUND 163 Guldborg - Nykøbing F - Nysted 14 NAKSKOV FJORD 144 Albuen–Enehøje–Vejlø–Slotø–Nakskov KILDER Internet. Wikipedia. ’Eniro.se’ og ’KRAK.dk’. Egne notater. Privat tryk 2010. Kort og Matrikelstyrelsens Søkort 2010. Auto-færdselskort, 1:200.00. Danmark 2007. Med vikingen som lods. Max Vinner. Vikingeskibsmuseet. 1997. 1000 naturlejrpladser i Danmark. Naturstyrelsen + 10 foreninger. 2008? Overnatning i det fri. Udgivet af Friluftrådets ERFA-gruppe. 20012, m. positioner. K7 Bøgestrøm s 3 JOLLESEJLADS Træf Fjordens -- 2004. Th. MARCUS NOER fra Vikingeskibsmuseet. UB. Formålet med disse kapitler er at beskrive et farvand med dets kyster og pege på lune pladser for jollesejlere. Lidt lokalhistorie og seværdigheder.
    [Show full text]
  • Hele Rapporten I Pdf Format
    Miljø- og Energiministeriet Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark Vandrammedirektiv–projekt, Fase 1 Faglig rapport fra DMU, nr. 369 [Tom side] Miljø- og Energiministeriet Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark Vandrammedirektiv–projekt, Fase 1 Faglig rapport fra DMU, nr. 369 2001 Kurt Nielsen Afdeling for Sø- og Fjordøkologi Bent Sømod Aarhus Amt Trine Christiansen Afdeling for Havmiljø Datablad Titel: Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark Undertitel: Vandrammedirektiv-projekt, Fase 1 Forfattere: Kurt Nielsen1, Bent Sømod2, Trine Christiansen3 Afdelinger: 1Afd. for Sø- og Fjordøkologi 2Aarhus Amt 3Afd. for Havmiljø Serietitel og nummer: Faglig rapport fra DMU nr. 369 Udgiver: Miljø- og Energiministeriet Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser URL: http://www.dmu.dk Udgivelsestidspunkt: August 2001 Faglig kommentering: Dorte Krause-Jensen, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser; Henning Karup, Miljøstyrelsen; Nanna Rask, Fyns Amt Layout: Pia Nygård Christensen Korrektur: Aase Dyhl Hansen og Pia Nygård Christensen Bedes citeret: Nielsen, K., Sømod, B. & T. Christiansen 2001: Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark. Vandrammedirektiv-projekt, Fase 1. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser. 107 s. - Faglig rapport fra DMU nr. 369. http://faglige-rapporter.dmu.dk. Gengivelse tilladt med tydelig kildeangivelse. Sammenfatning: Rapporten indeholder en opdeling af de danske kystområder i 16 forskellige typer i henhold
    [Show full text]
  • Vurdering Af Forstyrrelsestrusler I Natura 2000-Områderne
    VURDERING AF FORSTYRRELSESTRUSLER I NATURA 2000-OMRÅDERNE Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 52 2013 AARHUS AU UNIVERSITET DCE – NATIONALT CENTER FOR MILJØ OG ENERGI [Tom side] VURDERING AF FORSTYRRELSESTRUSLER I NATURA 2000-OMRÅDERNE Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 52 2013 Ole Roland Therkildsen Signe May Andersen Preben Clausen Thomas Bregnballe Karsten Laursen Jonas Teilmann Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Bioscience AARHUS AU UNIVERSITET DCE – NATIONALT CENTER FOR MILJØ OG ENERGI Datablad Serietitel og nummer: Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 52 Titel: Vurdering af forstyrrelsestrusler i NATURA 2000-områderne Forfattere: Ole Roland Therkildsen, Signe May Andersen, Preben Clausen, Thomas Bregnballe, Karsten Laursen & Jonas Teilmann Institution: Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Bioscience Udgiver: Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi © URL: http://dce.au.dk Udgivelsesår: Januar 2013 Redaktion afsluttet: December 2012 Faglig kommentering: Ib Krag Petersen, Rasmus Due Nielsen og Anders Galatius Jørgensen Finansiel støtte: Naturstyrelsen Bedes citeret: Therkildsen, O.R., Andersen, S.M., Clausen, P., Bregnballe, T., Laursen, K. & Teilmann, J. 2013. Vurdering af forstyrrelsestrusler i NATURA 2000-områderne. Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi, 174 s. - Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 52 http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/SR52.pdf Gengivelse tilladt med tydelig kildeangivelse Sammenfatning: NATURA 2000-planernes indsatsprogram indeholder retningslinjer, hvorefter statslige myndigheder er forpligtet til at følge direkte op på NATURA 2000-planen i form af bekendtgørelser og lignende uden forudgående handleplanlægning. Naturstyrelsen skal som ansvarlig myndighed følge op på NATURA 2000-planerne i form af reservatbekendtgørelser, hvis det vurderes nødvendigt for at sikre fugle- og pattedyrarter på udpegningsgrundlaget mod forstyrrelser fra færdsel og jagt.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Setting and Tectonic Framework in Denmark
    DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2010/124 Low- and intermediate level radioactive waste from Risø, Denmark. Location studies for potential disposal areas. Report no. 3 Geological setting and tectonic framework in Denmark Stig A. Schack Pedersen & Peter Gravesen GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND MINISTRY OF CLIMATE AND ENERGY G E U S DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2010/124 Low- and intermediate level radioactive waste from Risø, Denmark. Location studies for potential disposal areas. Report no. 3 Geological setting and tectonic framework in Denmark Stig A. Schack Pedersen & Peter Gravesen GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND ~ MINISTRY OF CLIMATE AND ENERGY G E U S 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 The aim of this report ............................................................................................... 5 2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING OF DENMARK 6 2.1 The pre-Quaternary Geology of Denmark ............................................................... 7 3. GEOLOGICAL – TECTONIC FRAMEWORK 10 3.1 The geotectonic margins of the Danish Basin ....................................................... 10 3.2 Deep-seated tectonic structures ............................................................................ 12 4. SALT DIAPIRS 13 4.1 The salt provinces in Denmark ............................................................................... 14 5. TECTONICS OF CRETACEOUS AND TERTIARY DEPOSITS 17 6. TECTONICS OF BORNHOLM: BASEMENT, BLOC TECTONICS AND INVERSION 18 7. THE PRE-QUARTERNY SURFACE
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners Indberetning På
    Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægter er ekskl. ordinært § 21 a tilskud, vareafgift til havnene samt moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter i Billetindtægter i perioden marts- perioden marts- september i 2019 (i september i 2020 (i Kommune Rute 1.000 kr.) 1.000 kr.) Assens Baagø-Assens Fanø Fanø-Esbjerg Faaborg-Midtfyn Bjørnø-Faaborg Faaborg-Midtfyn Lyø-Avernakø-Faaborg Haderslev Aarø-Aarøsund Hedensted Hjarnø-Snaptun Holbæk Orø-Holbæk Holbæk Orø- Hammer bakker Horsens Endelave-Snaptun Kalundborg Havnsø-Sejerø Kalundborg Havnsø-Nekselø Langeland Strynø-Rudkøbing Lolland Fejø-Kragenæs Lolland Femø-Kragenæs Lolland Askø-Bandholm Læsø Læsø-Frederikshavn Norddjurs Anholt-Grenaa Odder Tunø-Hou Samsø Hou-Samsø Skive Fur-Branden Slagelse Agersø-Stigsnæs Slagelse Omø-Stigsnæs Struer Venø-Kleppen Svendborg Hjortø-Svendborg 1 3 Svendborg Skarø-drejø-Svendborg 139 111 Ærø Birkholm-Marstal Ærø Ærøskøbing-Svendborg Ærø Søby-Faaborg Ærø Søby-Fynshav Ærø Marstal-Rudkøbing Aabenraa Barsø-Barsø-Landing Aalborg Egholm-Aalborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Beregning af mindreindtægter Samlede mindreindtægte r i 2020 (i 1.000 kr.) 2 -28 Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på passagerområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægt er ekskl. ordinært § 21 b tilskud og moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter
    [Show full text]
  • Miljørapport
    Indholdsfortegnelse Miljørapport for forslag til Råstofplan 2016/2020 5 Ikke teknisk resumé 6 Indledning 8 Råstofplanens formål og sammenhæng med øvrige planer og 10 Miljøvurdering overordnet niveau 12 Biologisk mangfoldighed, flora og fauna 13 Befolkningen 16 Menneskers sundhed 19 Jordbund 20 Vand 21 Luft 23 Klimatiske faktorer 26 Materielle goder 27 Kulturarv (arkitektonisk og arkæologisk arv) 29 Landskab 30 Miljøvurdering af retningslinjer 32 Indvinding 33 Ressourcebeskyttelse og -udnyttelse 34 Hensyn til omkringboende 36 Efterbehandling 37 Forhold til anden administration 38 Miljøvurdering af forslag til nye graveområder 39 B1 Ammendrup udvidelse 41 Afgrænsning og vurdering 43 Bonderup 56 Afgrænsning og vurdering 58 A1 Bøtterup udvidelse 71 Afgrænsning og vurdering 73 Dronningmølle 87 Afgrænsning og vurdering 89 Græse Bakkeby 104 Afgrænsning og vurdering 106 D9 Grønlien 118 2 Afgrænsning og vurdering 120 K1 Holtegård 135 Afgrænsning og vurdering 138 D12 Krogstrup 151 Afgrænsning og vurdering 153 D8 Landerslev Vest 166 Afgrænsning og vurdering 169 L2 Ledøje Vest 182 Afgrænsning og vurdering 185 D4 Lyngerup udv. syd 206 Afgrænsning og vurdering 208 D4 Lyngerup udv. nord 224 Afgrænsning og vurdering 227 D11 Onsved 245 Afgrænsning og vurdering 247 J5 Hedeland udvidelse 264 Afgrænsning og vurdering 266 D7 Ryegård 280 Afgrænsning og vurdering 283 D10 Rørbæk 303 Afgrænsning og vurdering 306 F4 Skævinge 330 Afgrænsning og vurdering 332 E13 Stålhøjgård 347 Afgrænsning og vurdering 349 Søsum 372 Afgrænsning og vurdering 375 L1 Vindekilde 397
    [Show full text]
  • The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm
    The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm A Popular Initiative 1 Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm Number of turbines............. 20 x 2 MW Installed Power.................... 40 MW Hub height......................... 64 metres Rotor diameter................... 76 metres Total height........................ 102 metres Foundation depth................ 4 to 8 metres Foundation weight (dry)........ 1,800 tonnes Wind speed at 50-m height... 7.2 m/s Expected production............ 100 GWh/y Production 2002................. 100 GWh (wind 97% of normal) Park efficiency.................... 93% Construction year................ 2000 Investment......................... 48 mill. EUR Kastrup Airport The Middelgrunden Wind Farm is situated a few kilometres away from the centre of Copenhagen. The offshore turbines are connected by cable to the transformer at the Amager power plant 3.5 km away. Kongedybet Hollænderdybet Middelgrunden Saltholm Flak 2 From Idea to Reality The idea of the Middelgrunden wind project was born in a group of visionary people in Copenhagen already in 1993. However it took seven years and a lot of work before the first cooperatively owned offshore wind farm became a reality. Today the 40 MW wind farm with twenty modern 2 MW wind turbines developed by the Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative and Copenhagen Energy Wind is producing electricity for more than 40,000 households in Copenhagen. In 1996 the local association Copenhagen Environment and Energy Office took the initiative of forming a working group for placing turbines on the Middelgrunden shoal and a proposal with 27 turbines was presented to the public. At that time the Danish Energy Authority had mapped the Middelgrunden shoal as a potential site for wind development, but it was not given high priority by the civil servants and the power utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Testing of Tools for Intercalibration of Phytoplankton, Macrovegetation and Benthic Fauna in Danish Coastal Areas
    DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TOOLS FOR INTERCALIBRATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON, MACROVEGETATION AND BENTHIC FAUNA IN DANISH COASTAL AREAS Scientifi c Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93 2014 AARHUS AU UNIVERSITY DCE – DANISH CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY [Blank page] DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TOOLS FOR INTERCALIBRATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON, MACROVEGETATION AND BENTHIC FAUNA IN DANISH COASTAL AREAS Scientifi c Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and EnergyNo. 93 2014 Jacob Carstensen Dorte Krause-Jensen Alf Josefson Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience AARHUS AU UNIVERSITY DCE – DANISH CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Data sheet Series title and no.: Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93 Title: Development and testing of tools for intercalibration of phytoplankton, macrovegetation and benthic fauna in Danish coastal areas Authors: Jacob Carstensen, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Alf Josefson Institution: Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience Publisher: Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy © URL: http://dce.au.dk/en Year of publication: March 2014 Editing completed: February 2014 Referees: Peter Henriksen, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Financial support: Danish Nature Agency (NST) Please cite as: Carstensen, J., Krause-Jensen, D., Josefson, A. 2014. Development and testing of tools for intercalibration of phytoplankton, macrovegetation and benthic fauna in Danish coastal areas. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 85 pp. Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93. http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR93.pdf Reproduction permitted provided the source is explicitly acknowledged Abstract: This report contributes to the development of indicators and assessment tools for ecological status classification according to the European Water Framework Directive as well as the intercalibration of the phytoplankton biomass indicator with Sweden and Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • 555 the Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude
    The Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude Elferink* Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, Utrecht University, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The regime of passage through these straits has been the subject of extensiveregulation, raising the question how different applicable instruments interact. Apart from applicable bilateral and multilateral treaties, it is necessaryto take into account the practice of Denmark and Swedenand other interested states, and regulatory activities within the framework of the IMO. The Case ConcerningPassage Through the Great Belt before the ICJ provides insights into the views of Denmark and Finland. The article concludesthat an 1857treaty excludesthe applicabilityof Part III of the LOS Convention to the straits, and that there are a number of difficultiesin assessingthe contents of the regimeof the straits. At the same time, these uncertaintiesdo not seem to have been a complicatingfactor for the adoption of measuresto regulate shipping traffic. Introduction The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The straits are of vital importance for the maritime communication of the Baltic states and squarely fall within the legal category of straits used for international navigation For a number of these states the Baltic Sea is the only outlet to the oceans (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland). Although * An earlier version of this article was presented at the international conference, The Passage of Ships Through Straits, sponsored by the Defense Analyses Institute, Athens, 23 October 1999. The author wishes to thank the speakers and participants at that conference for the stimulating discussions, which assisted in preparing the final version of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Living in Denmark
    To change the color of the coloured box, right-click here and select Format Background, change the color as shown in the picture on the right. Coastal living in Denmark © Daniel Overbeck - VisitNordsjælland To change the color of the coloured box, right-click here and select Format Background, change the color as shown in the picture on the right. The land of endless beaches In Denmark, we look for a touch of magic in the ordinary, and we know that travel is more than ticking sights off a list. It’s about finding wonder in the things you see and the places you go. One of the wonders that we at VisitDenmark are particularly proud of is our nature. Denmark has wonderful beaches open to everyone, and nowhere in the nation are you ever more than 50km from the coast. s. 2 © Jill Christina Hansen To change the color of the coloured box, right-click here and select Format Background, change the color as shown in the picture on the right. Denmark and its regions Geography Travel distances Aalborg • The smallest of the Scandinavian • Copenhagen to Odense: Bornholm countries Under 2 hours by car • The southernmost of the • Odense to Aarhus: Under 2 Scandinavian countries hours by car • Only has a physical border with • Aarhus to Aalborg: Under 2 Germany hours by car • Denmark’s regions are: North, Mid, Jutland West and South Jutland, Funen, Aarhus Zealand, and North Zealand and Copenhagen Billund Facts Copenhagen • Video Introduction • Denmark’s currency is the Danish Kroner Odense • Tipping is not required Zealand • Most Danes speak fluent English Funen • Denmark is of the happiest countries in the world and Copenhagen is one of the world’s most liveable cities • Denmark is home of ‘Hygge’, New Nordic Cuisine, and LEGO® • Denmark is easily combined with other Nordic countries • Denmark is a safe country • Denmark is perfect for all types of travelers (family, romantic, nature, bicyclist dream, history/Vikings/Royalty) • Denmark has a population of 5.7 million people s.
    [Show full text]
  • GEN 2.4 Location Indicators / Stedindikatorer
    VFR Flight Guide GEN 2.4 - 1 Denmark 25 MAR 21 GEN 2.4 Location Indicators / Stedindikatorer Note: Location indicators identified by an * cannot be addressed over the AFS/ Stedindikatorer identificeret med en * kan ikke adresseres over AFS 1. Encode / Omsætning til kode 2. Decode / Dechifrering Location / Indicator / Indicator / Location / Sted Indikator Indikator Sted A6A (Private helideck) EKAF * EKAB * ARNBORG (Private AD) AALBORG (CIV/MIL) EKYT EKAC* AARHUS VANDFLYVEPLADS AALBORG HEMS (Private heliport) EKAL* (Water AD) AARHUS EKAH EKAE ÆRØ AARHUS(JRCC) EKMC EKAF * A6A (Private helideck) AARHUS VANDFLYVEPLADS EKAC* EKAH AARHUS (Water AD) EKAL* AALBORG HEMS (Private heliport) AARHUS HEARTCENTER HEMS EKSH * EKAN * SYD ARNE NORD (Private helideck) (Private heliport) EKAO * ÆRØ HELIPORT (Private helideck) AARHUS TRAUMACENTER HEMS EKTR * EKAR * SYD ARNE (Private helideck) (Private heliport) EKAS * TRUE SVÆVEFLYVEBANE ANHOLT EKAT * (Private AD) ANHOLT VINDMØLLEPARK (Private EKAV * EKAT * ANHOLT helideck) EKAV * ANHOLT VINDMØLLEPARK (Private ANNISSE (Private AD) EKHE * helideck) ARNBORG (Private AD) EKAB * EKBH * BOLHEDE FLYVEPLADS (Private AD) BILLUND EKBI EKBI BILLUND BOLHEDE FLYVEPLADS (Private AD) EKBH * EKBR * BRÆDSTRUP (Private AD) BORNHOLM HEMS (Private heliport) EKRB * EKBU * BUTENDIEK (Private helideck) BORNHOLM/RØNNE EKRN EKCA * TRAFIKSTYRELSEN / DANISH BRÆDSTRUP (Private AD) EKBR * TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BUTENDIEK (Private helideck) EKBU * EKCB * ÅRSLEV (Private heliport) CECILIE (Private helideck) EKCE * EKCC* KØBENHAVN VANDFLYVEPLADS
    [Show full text]
  • Naturguiden 2012 Naturture I Himmerland Og Sydlige Vendsyssel
    NATURGUIDEN 2012 NATURTURE I HIMMERLAND OG SYDLIGE VENDSYSSEL MED KLIKBART ovERSIGTSKORT >> Klik her for at se oversigtskort WWW.NATURGUIDENHIMMERLAND.DK OVERSIGTSKORT Ved at klikke på numrene kan du komme videre til beskrivelsen af E 39 de enkelte ture. 184, 210 Hammer 41,125 Bakker E 45 153,164 205,215 271 211 Lindholm Bouet 3,120 Egholm 55,68 228,265 Heste- 162 skoen 583 Aalborg Hou 133,146 169 193 12 5, 45, 74, 81 Østerå- 148 102, 202 dalen 243 187 Hals 2,101 85 57 95 Drastrup 170 110,141 207 Aggersborg 262 135 Skov 221,230 595 220 231,245 Sebber- Nibe 19, 91 11 257,258 123 sund 199 Lundby 26,47 567 E 45 Bakker 127,204 Løgstør 132 519 Høstemark 6,168 Skov 4,15,111,113 Himmerlandske Halkær 128,171,175 Mølle 181,185,250 Dokkedal 89 heder 268 1,10,16,17,29,30 119 507 31,33,35,37,42 97,105 200 69,201 43,56,58,59,60 Livø 106,134 20,65 63,75,76,77,80 8,21,23,25,27,28,32, 152,178 235 13 84,87,88,96,98 Lille 38,51,64,72,79,108,179 189,218 46 Støvring 187 99,107,112,114 191,196,209,219,222 195 Vildmose Vitskøl Navn Sø 130 167 116,124,126,138 224,225,232,239,242 216 142,143,144,147 244,251,254 Vilsted Sø 252 150,154,155,158 Jenle 9,24,78 Skørping 166,172,173,176 62 227,241 180,182,186,206 187 Plantage 249,264 180 Rebild 208,212,214,217 Tofte 163 136 223,236,237,238 Skov 533 Bakker 247,253,255,256 259,263,266,267 Øster Hurup 67 Rold Skov Madum Sø 269,270,272,273 73 Ertebølle 40,104 274 203 Aars St.
    [Show full text]