The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Start List 2021 IRONMAN Copenhagen (Last Update: 2021-08-15) Sorted by PRO, AWA, Pole Posistion and Age Group (AG) Search for Your Name with "Ctrl F"
Start list 2021 IRONMAN Copenhagen (last update: 2021-08-15) Sorted by PRO, AWA, Pole Posistion and Age Group (AG) Search for your name with "Ctrl F" BIB First name Last name AG AWA TriClub Nationallty Please note that BIBs will be given onsite according to the selected swim time you choose in registration oniste. 1 Hogenhaug Kristian MPRO DNK (Denmark) 2 Molinari Giulio MPRO ITA (Italy) 3 Wojt Lukasz MPRO DEU (Germany) 4 Svensson Jesper MPRO SWE (Sweden) 5 Sanders Lionel MPRO CAN (Canada) 6 Smales Elliot MPRO GBR (United Kingdom) 7 Heemeryck Pieter MPRO BEL (Belgium) 8 Mcnamee David MPRO GBR (United Kingdom) 9 Nilsson Patrik MPRO SWE (Sweden) 10 Hindkjær Kristian MPRO DNK (Denmark) 11 Plese David MPRO SVN (Slovenia) 12 Kovacic Jaroslav MPRO SVN (Slovenia) 14 Jarrige Yvan MPRO FRA (France) 15 Schuster Paul MPRO DEU (Germany) 16 Dário Vinhal Thiago MPRO BRA (Brazil) 17 Lyngsø Petersen Mathias MPRO DNK (Denmark) 18 Koutny Philipp MPRO CHE (Switzerland) 19 Amorelli Igor MPRO BRA (Brazil) 20 Petersen-Bach Jens MPRO DNK (Denmark) 21 Olsen Mikkel Hojborg MPRO DNK (Denmark) 22 Korfitsen Oliver MPRO DNK (Denmark) 23 Rahn Fabian MPRO DEU (Germany) 24 Trakic Strahinja MPRO SRB (Serbia) 25 Rother David MPRO DEU (Germany) 26 Herbst Marcus MPRO DEU (Germany) 27 Ohde Luis Henrique MPRO BRA (Brazil) 28 McMahon Brent MPRO CAN (Canada) 29 Sowieja Dominik MPRO DEU (Germany) 30 Clavel Maurice MPRO DEU (Germany) 31 Krauth Joachim MPRO DEU (Germany) 32 Rocheteau Yann MPRO FRA (France) 33 Norberg Sebastian MPRO SWE (Sweden) 34 Neef Sebastian MPRO DEU (Germany) 35 Magnien Dylan MPRO FRA (France) 36 Björkqvist Morgan MPRO SWE (Sweden) 37 Castellà Serra Vicenç MPRO ESP (Spain) 38 Řenč Tomáš MPRO CZE (Czech Republic) 39 Benedikt Stephen MPRO AUT (Austria) 40 Ceccarelli Mattia MPRO ITA (Italy) 41 Günther Fabian MPRO DEU (Germany) 42 Najmowicz Sebastian MPRO POL (Poland) If your club is not listed, please log into your IRONMAN Account (www.ironman.com/login) and connect your IRONMAN Athlete Profile with your club. -
Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector M. Dolores Esteban *, José-Santos López-Gutiérrez and Vicente Negro Research Group on Marine, Coastal and Port Environment and other Sensitive Areas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.-S.L.-G.); [email protected] (V.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: In recent years, the offshore wind industry has seen an important boost that is expected to continue in the coming years. In order for the offshore wind industry to achieve adequate development, it is essential to solve some existing uncertainties, some of which relate to foundations. These foundations are important for this type of project. As foundations represent approximately 35% of the total cost of an offshore wind project, it is essential that they receive special attention. There are different types of foundations that are used in the offshore wind industry. The most common types are steel monopiles, gravity-based structures (GBS), tripods, and jackets. However, there are some other types, such as suction caissons, tripiles, etc. For high water depths, the alternative to the previously mentioned foundations is the use of floating supports. Some offshore wind installations currently in operation have GBS-type foundations (also known as GBF: Gravity-based foundation). Although this typology has not been widely used until now, there is research that has highlighted its advantages over other types of foundation for both small and large water depth sites. There are no doubts over the importance of GBS. -
Life and Cult of Cnut the Holy the First Royal Saint of Denmark
Life and cult of Cnut the Holy The first royal saint of Denmark Edited by: Steffen Hope, Mikael Manøe Bjerregaard, Anne Hedeager Krag & Mads Runge Life and cult of Cnut the Holy The first royal saint of Denmark Report from an interdisciplinary research seminar in Odense. November 6th to 7th 2017 Edited by: Steffen Hope, Mikael Manøe Bjerregaard, Anne Hedeager Krag & Mads Runge Kulturhistoriske studier i centralitet – Archaeological and Historical Studies in Centrality, vol. 4, 2019 Forskningscenter Centrum – Odense Bys Museer Syddansk Univeristetsforlag/University Press of Southern Denmark KING CNUT’S DONATION LETTER AND SETTLEMENT STRUCTURE IN DENMARK, 1085 – NEW PERSPECTIVES ON AN OLD DOCUMENT King Cnut’s donation letter and settle- ment structure in Denmark, 1085 – new perspectives on an old document By Jesper Hansen One of the most important sources to the history of donated to the Church of St Laurentius, the cathedral medieval Denmark is the donation letter of Cnut IV, church in Lund, and it represents the first written re- dated 21st of May 1085 and signed in Lund (fig. 1). cord of rural administration and fiscal rights in Den- This letter is a public affirmation of the royal gifts mark (Latin text, appendix 1). Cnut’s donation letter Skälshög, two hides. In Flädie, five this agreed-upon decree against the to the church in Lund and a half hides which Håkon gave to command of holy religion, he is to be the king. In Hilleshög, half a hide. In excommunicated upon the Return of (Dipl. Dan 1.2:21) Håstad, one hide. In Gärd. In Venestad, our Lord and to be consigned to eternal In the name of the indivisible Trinity, one hide. -
Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm Bird Monitoring Program 2010-2012
Dong Energy A/S Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm Bird Monitoring Program 2010-2012 BIRD MIGRATION Dong Energy A/S Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm Bird Monitoring Program 2010-2012 BIRD MIGRATION Client Dong Energy A/S att. Birte Hansen Kraftværksvej 53 DK-7000 Fredericia Consultants Orbicon A/S Jens Juuls Vej 16 8260 Viby J DHI A/S Agern Allé 2 2970 Hørsholm Project ID 1321000072 Document 1321000075-03-003 Project manager Simon B. Leonhard Authors Henrik Skov, Simon B. Leonhard, Stefan Heinänen, Ramunas Zydelis, Niels Einar Jensen, Jan Durinck, Thomas W. Johansen, Bo P. Jensen, Brian L. Hansen, Werner Piper, Per N. Grøn Checked by Bo Svenning Pedersen Version 3 Approved by Lars Sloth Issued date December 2012 Data sheet Title: Horns Rev 2 Monitoring 2010-2012. Migrating Birds. Authors: Henrik Skov2, Simon B. Leonhard1, Stefan Heinänen2, Ramunas Zydelis2, Niels Einar Jensen2, Jan Durinck3, Thomas W. Johansen3, Bo P. Jensen2, Brian L. Hansen2, Werner Piper4, Per N. Grøn1. Institutions: 1Orbicon A/S, Jens Juuls Vej 16, DK-8260 Viby J, Denmark; 2DHI, Agern Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark; 3Marine Observers, Svankjærvej 6, DK-7752 Snested, Denmark; 4Biola, Gotenstrasse 4, D-20097 Hamburg Germany. Publisher: Horns Rev II A/S. Kraftværksvej 53, DK-7000 Fredericia, Denmark. Year: 2012 Version: 3 Report to be cited: Skov H.; Leonhard, S.B.; Heinänen, S.; Zydelis, R.; Jensen, N.E.; Durinck, J.; Johansen, T.W.; Jensen, B.P.; Hansen, B.L.; Piper, W.; Grøn, P.N. 2012. Horns Rev 2 Monitoring 2010-2012. Migrating Birds. Orbicon, DHI, Marine Observers and Biola. -
Vision for Smart Energy in Denmark - Research, Development and Demonstration
Smart Energy Networks VISION FOR SMART Research, Development and Demonstration ENERGY IN DENMARK Research, Development and Demonstration Vision for Smart Energy in Denmark - Research, Development and Demonstration The Danish agenda for climate and energy is efficiencies, integration of the various energy very ambitious aiming at a renewable-based infrastructures (electricity, gas, heating and energy system by 2050. The road to 2050 will cooling), flexible energy consumption in build- not be easy - new technologies, architectures, ings, industry and transport, and smart system markets, actors and business models need to be operation. developed, and including changes in the regu- lation of the energy systems and tax systems, The transition of the energy system requires which allow for and support new business mod- rethinking the energy management and the 3 2 els and new consumption patterns. way we use energy. It is essential that the over- all design and solutions for the future smart Vision for Smart Energy in Denmark The ambition can only be achieved in a sustain- energy system are cost-effective and not least able way through combinations of high energy socially acceptable and feasible. The future Smart THE DEFINITION OF A SMART ENERGY SYSTEM: A smart energy system is a cost-effective, sustainable and secure energy system in Energy System which renewable energy production, infrastructures and consumption are integrated Vision for Smart Energy in Denmark and coordinated through energy services, active users and enabling technologies. The future Smart Energy System will be sustai- The main renewable energy sources in Den- nable, efficient, cost effective, integrated and mark are wind, solar and biomass. -
Validation of the Dynamic Wake Meandering Model with Respect To
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2020-126 Preprint. Discussion started: 8 December 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Validation of the dynamic wake meandering model with respect to loads and power production Inga Reinwardt1, Levin Schilling1, Dirk Steudel2, Nikolay Dimitrov3, Peter Dalhoff1, and Michael Breuer4 1Dep. Mechanical Engineering & Production, HAW Hamburg, Berliner Tor 21, D-20099 Hamburg, Germany 2Dep. Turbine Load Calculation, Nordex Energy GmbH, Langenhorner Chaussee 600, D-22419 Hamburg, Germany 3Dep. of Wind Energy, DTU, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark 4Dep. of Fluid Mechanics, Helmut-Schmidt University Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, D-22043 Hamburg, Germany Correspondence: Inga Reinwardt ([email protected]) Abstract. The outlined analysis validates the dynamic wake meandering (DWM) model based on loads and power production measured at an onshore wind farm with small turbine distances. Special focus is given to the performance of a version of the DWM model that was previously recalibrated at the site. The recalibration is based on measurements from a turbine nacelle- mounted lidar. The different versions of the DWM model are compared to the commonly used Frandsen turbulence model. 5 The results of the recalibrated wake model agree very well with the measurements, whereas the Frandsen model overestimates the loads drastically for short turbine distances. Furthermore, lidar measurements of the wind speed deficit as well as the wake meandering are incorporated in the DWM model definition in order to decrease the uncertainties. 1 Introduction Wake models are a key aspect in every site-specific load calculation procedure. The used wake model has significant impact on 10 predicted loads and the power output of the whole wind farm, hence, an accurate wake model is of major importance for a wind farm design optimization process. -
In-Depth Review of Energy Efficiency Policies and Programmes of Denmark
09486/00_Cover EN 5/03/04 7:39 Page 1 Energy Charter Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects (PEEREA) In-depth Review of Energy Efficiency Policies and Programmes of Denmark Energy Charter Secretariat 2004 Boulevard de la Woluwe, 56 B-1200 Brussels Belgium Tel. +32-(0)2 775 98 00 Fax +32-(0)2 775 98 01 9 789059 480247 E-mail [email protected] http://www.encharter.org Energy Charter Secretariat ISBN 90-5948-024-4 D/2003/7850/13 09486/00_Danemark EN 2/03/04 8:03 Page 1 IN-DEPTH REVIEW OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES OF DENMARK E NERGY C HARTER P ROTOCOL ON E NERGY E FFICIENCY AND R ELATED E NVIRONMENT A SPECTS (PEEREA) 09486/00_Danemark EN 2/03/04 8:03 Page 2 INTRODUCTION The Energy Charter Treaty was signed in December 1994 and entered into legal force in April 1998. To date the Treaty has been signed or acceded to by fifty-one states 1. The Treaty was developed on the basis of the European Energy Charter of 1991. Whereas the latter document was drawn up as a declaration of political intent to promote East-West energy co-operation, the Energy Charter Treaty is a legally- binding multilateral instrument covering investment protection, liberalisation of trade, freedom of transit, dispute settlement and environmental aspects in the energy sector. The Energy Charter Conference, the governing and decision-making body for the Energy Charter Treaty, meets on a regular basis - normally twice a year - to discuss policy issues affecting East-West energy co-operation, review implementation of the provisions of the Treaty, and consider possible new instruments and projects on energy issues. -
Case Study: Passivsystems Working with Dong Energy in Denmark
CONFIDENTIAL Case Study: PassivSystems working with Dong Energy in Denmark Introduction to the Danish Energy Market Following the oil crisis in the 1970s, Denmark set out to become energy self-sufficient. Consequently, as concerns over carbon emissions grew in the 1980s, Denmark found itself with relatively high carbon dioxide emissions per capita, primarily due to the coal-fired electrical power plants that had become the norm after the energy crisis. Denmark has been self-reliant on energy since 1999, with significant oil and gas production in the North Sea, and is a net exporter of energy. Denmark is the second largest producer of oil in the EU and oil plays an important role in the energy mix. Natural gas and renewable sources have been gradually replacing solid fuels and oil in primary energy supply. However, imported coal is an important fuel in electricity generation. Transport (34%) and households (28%) are the most energy-consuming sectors. Denmark demonstrates the lowest energy intensity among EU Member States, although due to the high presence of fossil fuels in the energy mix, CO2 per capita production and intensity are significantly higher than the EU average More recently Denmark has set itself strong targets for carbon reduction and the elimination of fossil fuels, with 35% of energy to be delivered from renewables by 2020 and 100% by 2050. Renewable energy has experienced a significant growth since the late 1980s with both wind and energy from waste contributing to energy production. Currently 25% of energy generation and over 40% of electricity comes from renewable sources, which by far exceed the EU averages. -
U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
A New Era for Wind Power in the United States
Chapter 3 Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States 1 Photo from iStock 7943575 1 This page is intentionally left blank 3 Impacts of the Wind Vision Summary Chapter 3 of the Wind Vision identifies and quantifies an array of impacts associated with continued deployment of wind energy. This 3 | Summary Chapter chapter provides a detailed accounting of the methods applied and results from this work. Costs, benefits, and other impacts are assessed for a future scenario that is consistent with economic modeling outcomes detailed in Chapter 1 of the Wind Vision, as well as exist- ing industry construction and manufacturing capacity, and past research. Impacts reported here are intended to facilitate informed discus- sions of the broad-based value of wind energy as part of the nation’s electricity future. The primary tool used to evaluate impacts is the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model. ReEDS is a capacity expan- sion model that simulates the construction and operation of generation and transmission capacity to meet electricity demand. In addition to the ReEDS model, other methods are applied to analyze and quantify additional impacts. Modeling analysis is focused on the Wind Vision Study Scenario (referred to as the Study Scenario) and the Baseline Scenario. The Study Scenario is defined as wind penetration, as a share of annual end-use electricity demand, of 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 35% by 2050. In contrast, the Baseline Scenario holds the installed capacity of wind constant at levels observed through year-end 2013. -
KØBENHAVNS BEFÆSTNING Fortiden Er Tæt På Indhold
KØBENHAVNS BEFÆSTNING Fortiden er tæt på Indhold Velkommen til Befæstningen 4 Bagsværdfortet 46 For konge og fædreland! 6 Kastrupfort 50 Trekroner 10 Kongelundsfort 54 Garderhøjfortet 16 Meget mere Befæstning 58 Ejbybunkeren 22 Få pulsen op! 60 Vestvolden 28 Skoletjenesten 62 Charlottenlundfort 38 Om Københavns Befæstning 64 Oversvømmelsen 42 Hvor ligger anlæggene? omslag Udgivet af: Realdania, Naturstyrelsen og Kulturstyrelsen www.befaestningen.dk Design: Bysted A/S Oplag: 2.000 stk. Billeder: Jeppe Carlsen, Lars Schmidt, Peter Lassen, Mikael Schlosser, Alexander BanckPetersen, Bysted, Statens Forsvarshistoriske Arkiv, Københavns Museum. KØBENHAVNS BEFÆSTNING Fortiden er tæt på VELKOMMEN TIL BEFÆSTNINGEN Velkommen til Befæstningen Københavns Befæstning ligger som en beskyttende ring om København. Nu vågner befæstningsringen til live som en sammen- hængende oplevelse, der bringer kultur- og naturoplevelser sammen i historiske rammer. Fæstningsværket er blandt de bedst bevarede forsvarsanlæg i Europa. Det består af en lang række forter og forsvarsstillinger, et oversvømmelsesanlæg og den godt 14 km lange Vestvold. Hovedparten af Befæstningen blev opført mellem 1885 og 1894, som reaktion på Danmarks sviende nederlag til tyskerne i 1864. Under 1. Ver- denskrig var forsvarsværket bemandet med næsten 50.000 soldater, men da krigen var slut, havde den teknologiske udvikling overhalet de mange forter og batterier, hvorfor hele Befæstningen blev nedlagt som beskyttelse af København. Fra overlevelse til oplevelse Nu genopstår Københavns Befæstning som en sammenhængende helhed, der for ener et stykke danmarkshistorie med enestående kultur- og naturoplevelser. Bygningsværker og naturarealer er blevet revitaliseret, så du kan gå på opdagelse på en lang række forter og anlæg i hele befæstningsringen. Du kan fx besøge op- levelsescentrene på søfortet Trekroner, i Ejbybunkeren og på Garderhøjfortet, prøve dine færdigheder på cykelbanerne i Rødovre, Brøndby, Hvidovre og Husum, tage på picnic i Oversvømmelsen eller spille mobilspil på Vestvolden i Hvidovre. -
555 the Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude
The Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude Elferink* Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, Utrecht University, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The regime of passage through these straits has been the subject of extensiveregulation, raising the question how different applicable instruments interact. Apart from applicable bilateral and multilateral treaties, it is necessaryto take into account the practice of Denmark and Swedenand other interested states, and regulatory activities within the framework of the IMO. The Case ConcerningPassage Through the Great Belt before the ICJ provides insights into the views of Denmark and Finland. The article concludesthat an 1857treaty excludesthe applicabilityof Part III of the LOS Convention to the straits, and that there are a number of difficultiesin assessingthe contents of the regimeof the straits. At the same time, these uncertaintiesdo not seem to have been a complicatingfactor for the adoption of measuresto regulate shipping traffic. Introduction The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The straits are of vital importance for the maritime communication of the Baltic states and squarely fall within the legal category of straits used for international navigation For a number of these states the Baltic Sea is the only outlet to the oceans (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland). Although * An earlier version of this article was presented at the international conference, The Passage of Ships Through Straits, sponsored by the Defense Analyses Institute, Athens, 23 October 1999. The author wishes to thank the speakers and participants at that conference for the stimulating discussions, which assisted in preparing the final version of the article.