DOCSLIB.ORG

The Concept of Border in Terms of Political Geography and the Border Between Turkey and Nakhchivan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Concept of Border in Terms of Political Geography and the Border Between Turkey and Nakhchivan International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Dec 2015, Vol. 5, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Concept of Border in Terms of Political Geography and the Border between Turkey and Nakhchivan Prof. Dr. Serhat ZAMAN Ataturk University, Department of Geography Education, Erzurum, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Corresponding author Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ogün COŞKUN Ataturk University, Department of Geography Education, Erzurum, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i12/1923 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i12/1923 Abstract The concept of border is one of the most overemphasized and controversial topics of political geography. It can be stated that it has become a popular study field from that aspect. Considering the fact that today’s world has been composed of structures called states and areas of sovereignty which have been registered by them, it is understood that the borders are very important elements regarding these sovereignty areas. However, all the borders do not share the same characteristics. While some of the borders are means of isolation, some of them bear a symbolical meaning. This research study discusses the state border between Turkey and the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic from the political geography perspective. A general description was made with the history of the border, general geographical features of the border zone and treaties. As a result, it is possible to state that the short border between the two countries has almost become invisible due to intense interactions, that is to say, it has become symbolical because both sides of the shared border is a follow-up of one another both naturally and culturally. Key words: Borders, Turkey, Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, Political Geography, Azerbaijan. I.INTRODUCTION The existence of borders has been occasionally discussed and they are severely one of the most important elements of today’s world. It is possible to encounter borders in a wide range from ownership of territory in a small scale to the boundaries of states on a large scale and the borders which separate the areas of sovereignty belonging to the states. Some people consider that border is a concrete and visible physical structure. Maybe, it is the form of a distinction 79 www.hrmars.com International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Dec 2015, Vol. 5, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 which started in the mind first and then came into being physically. No matter what it is, borders have been built to separate one thing from the other and it is most probably a tool which has been doing it for thousands of years. A border is a phenomenon of human beings which they have been keeping alive for a long time and an apparently it is predicted that they will continue to keep it alive for a long time because the border is both a protective factor and also a location which is being surpassed or crossed. Moreover, the border is sometimes an indicator of power and weakness. Strengthening one’s existence and power by creating “the other” is one of the ways which organisms called states, particularly the models of nation-state, apply frequently because while “the other” is being created outside the borders of the country, “we”, what is most desired, is formed or is wanted to be formed in the interior of the country. The border and its visible elements are the things that they look for in order to differentiate the other from oneself. While the border is sometimes an indicator of power for the area it covers, sometimes it is a territory which the inhabitants want to leave. Thus, the border is attractive for some but also it can be an unattractive environment or a land of motivation. The immigration of refugees which continue without slowing down in the world and their adventures to cross the borders are one of the most significant indicators. The borders which are important with their distinctive features become symbolical via strong interactions in the modern sates era (Zaman, 2014: 122). However, it is possible only under some special circumstances. In today’s world, this condition has been encountered mostly between the states which were developed and ruled with the similar systems or between the mutual parties that share very similar ethno-cultural characteristics. A border is a line that separates the areas of benefit and dominance (Akengin, 2010: 105). Considering another view, borders are proofs that states have sovereignty over an area of land or they are national markers. They are the indicators of authority, ownership, existence, and property (Karabağ, 2008: 16). Bennafla stresses that the border cannot be reduced to spatial boundary of state sovereignty or in other words, cannot be degraded to the area of land which encloses the territory of the states and she also states that the borders have become vague after the nation-state period and they expanded outwards and inwards like a web (Bennafla and et al., 2014: 19). Green, states that borders should not be considered as physical objects located at the ends of the countries and discusses that they are concepts whose metaphorical and symbolical meanings must be focused on (2014: 39). As it is seen, the concept of border involves rich and varied meanings due to its dynamic structure. Like many concepts belonging to human sciences, the concept of border has experienced the processes of variety and richness in meaning due to its ability to adapt to the 80 www.hrmars.com International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Dec 2015, Vol. 5, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 spirit of the time. For example, the meaning the concept of border bears during the foundation of state-nations and the meaning it carries in today’s global world are not the same. When the concept of border and the research studies carried out on this issue are reviewed, it is easily understood that it is not possible to standardize this concept by making generalizations because nearly all the borders have different stories and distinctive features. Thus, the border research has become an interdisciplinary research subject. They are chosen as a research study topic by the disciplines such as history, geography, economics, anthropology, political sciences and sociology regarding their evolution processes, histories, their identity and cultural aspects, political aspects, economic functions, their sides related to security and immigration, debatable features, positions, physical and substantial factors and similar qualities. Regarding political geography, the concept of border is examined from different perspectives and elaborated. The most important aspects of the borders are their shapes, history, formation processes, disputed enclaves or aspects, what they distinguish, where they run through, their appearances in the area of land, their geopolitical importance, and pretensions. However, changes have occurred in political geography’s traditional approach to the borders in time. Political geography in the beginning was mostly interested in the concrete elements of the border (spatial analytical approach) and then it began to show interest in the ethno-cultural aspects of the borders and also their abstract sides which have visible effects. A short history of the border between Turkey and Nakhchivan, physical characteristics of the border and the mutual relationships established via the border will be discussed in this study. II. Purpose and Method The aim of this study is to examine the border between Turkey and Nakhchivan within the framework of developing contemporary approaches of the political geography and thus making contributions to the literature of border studies. In line with this aim, besides the observations and investigations carried out around the border in different periods between 2013 and 2015, various research studies carried out about the subject were reviewed. The border’s current position and its strategic position in the future was tried to be examined with the evaluation of the data obtained within the framework of spatial analysis. III. Historical Background of the Border The border between Turkey and the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic was drawn by the Treaty of Moscow signed on March 16, 1921 and the Treaty of Kars signed on October 13, 1921. Because the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic did not have an independent status when the treaties were signed as it does today, it did not directly have a voice in the treaties. The Turkish 81 www.hrmars.com International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Dec 2015, Vol. 5, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 side in that period was the direct counterparty in the treaties under the name of the Government of Turkish Grand National Assembly. Both treaties are important because they provided both Turkey and Nakhchivan to have a physical border. To state it more clearly, although the Treaties of Moscow and Kars are well-known for identifying Turkey’s northeast borderlines, they are also directly influential in identifying a neighbour’s status and existence because both Soviet Russia and Soviet Armenia, under the protection of Soviet Russia, made attempts to include Nakhchivan and its vicinity in Armenian borders until the treaties were signed and they took quite important decisions in order to actualize it. Some of these decisions were related to the status of Nakhchivan and also in favour of them. One of these decisions and also what made Turkey to be included in the subject is the decision to attach Nakhchivan to Armenia. After Azerbaijan in April, 1920 and Armenia in the same year passed into Soviet Russian possession, it helped a series of decisions to be taken in favour of Armenia in the union. It was understood that after being pushed into the Soviet Russian control, Soviet Azerbaijan could not take its decisions on its own because it made decisions under Russian obligation but maybe Soviet Azerbaijan’s decision dated to November 30, 1920 became so important that it could change the fate of the South Caucasus because the decisions taken by the Azerbaijan Communist Party on that date were composed of the results that were in favour of Armenia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issue Brief for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code IB92089 Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Russia Updated March 14, 2003 Stuart D. Goldman Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Post-Soviet Russia and Its Significance for the United States Political Developments Economic Developments Economic Reform Foreign Policy Defense Policy Fundamental Shakeup of the Military Control of Nuclear Weapons U.S. Policy U.S.-Russian Relations U.S. Assistance IB92089 03-14-03 Russia SUMMARY Vladimir Putin, catapulted into the ber 11, however, Russia has adopted a much Kremlin by Boris Yeltsin’s resignation, was more cooperative attitude on many issues. elected President on March 26, 2000 by a solid majority that embraced his military The military is in turmoil after years of campaign in Chechnya. Parties backing Putin severe force reductions and budget cuts. The did well in the December 1999 Duma election, armed forces now number about one million, giving Putin a stable parliamentary majority as down from 4.3 million Soviet troops in 1986. well. Putin’s top priority is to revive the Weapons procurement is down sharply. economy and integrate Russia into the global Readiness, training, morale, and discipline marketplace. He has also strengthened the have suffered. Putin’s government has increa- central government vis-a-vis the regions and sed defense spending sharply but there is brought TV and radio under tighter state conflict between the military and the control. Federal forces have suppressed large- government and within the military over scale military resistance in Chechnya but face resource allocation, restructuring, and reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Transcaucasus 1917-1945: Nations in Transition
    SOVIET TRANSCAUCASUS 1917-1945: NATIONS IN TRANSITION A Master’s Thesis by DİDEM AKSOY Department of International Relations İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara September 2013 SOVIET TRANSCAUCASUS 1917-1945: NATIONS IN TRANSITION Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by DİDEM AKSOY In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2013 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------------- Dr. Hasan Ali Karasar Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erel Tellal Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Dr. Kürşad Turan Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT SOVIET TRANSCAUCASUS 1917-1945: NATIONS IN TRANSITION Aksoy, Didem M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Dr. Hasan Ali KARASAR September 2013 This thesis analyzes the nationalities policy of the Soviet Union with a special emphasis on three major Transcaucasian nationalities, i.e. Georgians, Azerbaijanis and Armenians. The thesis focuses on the Soviet nationalities policy and attempts to shed light on the history of these three Transcaucasian nationalities within the context of this policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Irīna Ivaškina
    IRĪNA IVAŠKINA Title: Ms. Citizenship: Latvia Mobile Phone: (+371) 28252237 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Riga Stradins University Riga, Latvia September 2008 – Master’s Degree of Social Science in Politics, Academic study program: International Relations Riga Stradins University Riga, Latvia September 2003 - June 2007 Bachelor’s Degree of Social Science in Politics, Academic study program: International Relations- European studies Academic papers: Latvian development cooperation policy towards Georgia (2005) European Neighbourhood Policy towards Georgia: opportunities and constraints (2006) Georgia’s social identity in relationship with the EU and Russia after the Rose revolution (2007) WORK EXPERINCE Latvian Transatlantic Organisation (LATO) Riga, Latvia February 2008 – present Project Manager Main responsibilities: project management; public relations; communication with international partners; office work. Main projects: Riga Conference (2008, 2009, 2010) www.rigaconference.lv Public discussion “NATO’s Future: A Baltic View” (June 1, 2010, Riga) Akhaltsikhe International Security Seminar 2008 (November 24-26, 2009, Tbilisi, Georgia) Association ‘’Georgian Youth for Europe’’ Rustavi, Georgia July 2007 – January 2008 European Volunteer Service, Volunteer Main responsibilities: Education of youngsters about the EU and NATO; Promotion of the “Youth in Action” programme among local youngsters; Assisting in implementation of projects. 1 Latvian Transatlantic organisation (LATO) Riga, Latvia September – December 2006
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology in the Caucasus
    -.! r. d, J,,f ssaud Artsus^rNn Mlib scoIuswVC ffiLffi pac,^^€C erplJ pue lr{o) '-I dlllqd ,iq pa11pa ,(8oyoe er4lre Jo ecr] JeJd eq] pue 'sct1t1od 'tustleuolleN 6rl Se]tlJlljd 18q1 uueul lOu soop sltll'slstSo[ocPqJJu ul?lsl?JneJ leool '{uetuJO ezrsuqdtue ol qsl'\\ c'tl'laslno aql 1V cqtJo lr?JttrrJ Suteq e:u e,\\ 3llLl,\\'ieqt 'teqlout? ,{g eldoed .uorsso.rciclns euoJo .:etqSnr:1s louJr crleuols,{s eql ul llnseJ {eru leql tsr:d snolJes uoJl uPlseJnPJ lerll JO suoluolstp :o ..sSutpucJsltu,' "(rolsrqerd '..r8u,pn"r.. roJ EtlotlJr qsllqulso ol ]duralltl 3o elqetclecctl Surqsrn8urlstp o.1". 'speecorcl ll sV 'JB ,(rnluec qlxls-pltu eql ut SutuutSeq'et3:oe9 11^ly 'porred uralse,t\ ut uotJl?ztuolol {eer{) o1 saleleJ I se '{1:clncrlled lBJlsselc uP qil'\\ Alluclrol eq] roJ eJueptlc 1r:crSoloaeqcJe uuts11311l?J Jo uollRnlele -ouoJt-loueqlpue-snseon€JuJequoueqlpuE'l?luoulJv'er8rocg'uelteq -JaZVulpJosejotrolsrqerdsqtJoSuouE}erdlelutSutreptsuoc.,{11euor8ar lsrgSurpeeco:cl'lceistqlsulleJlsnlpselduexalere^esButlele;"{qsnsecne3 reded stql cql ur .{SoloeeqJlu Jo olnlpu lecrllod eql elBltsuotuop [lt,\\ .paluroclduslp lou st euo 'scrlr1od ,(:erodueluoJ o1 polelsJUtr '1tns:nd JturcpeJe olpl ue aq or ,{Soloeuqole 3o ecrlcu'rd eq} lcedxa lou plno'{\ 'SIJIUUOC aAISOldxe ouo 3Jor{,t\ PoJe uP sl 1t 'suolllpuoJ aseql IIe UsAtD sluqle pur: ,{poolq ,{11euor1dacxo lulo^es pue salndstp lelrollrrel snor0tunu qlr,n elalder uot,3e; elllBlo^ ,(re,r. e st 1l 'uolun lel^os JeuIJoJ aql io esdelloc eqt ue,tr.3 'snsBsnBJ aql jo seldoed peu'{u oql lle ro3 ln3Sutueau 'l?Iuusllllu
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    75967 Review of World Bank engagement in the Public Disclosure Authorized Irrigation and Drainage Sector in Azerbaijan Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized February 2013 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2012 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000I Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Rev. Dr. Robert M. Roegner
    RLCMussiaS WORLD MISSIONandTOUR the Baltics May 22 - June 4, 2007 Hosted by The Rev. Dr. Robert & Kristi Roegner The Rev. Dr. William & Carol Diekelman The Rev. Brent & Jennie Smith 3 o c s o M , n i l m e r K e h t n a e r a u - S e R Dear Friends o. LCMS World Mission, One never knoIs Ihere and Ihen od Iill open a door for the ood NeIs of Jesus. /ith the fall of the Iron Curtain, od opened a door of huge opportunity in Russia and Eastern Europe. ,he collapse of European Communism also brought us in touch--and in partnership--Iith felloI Lutherans Iho by od's grace had remained steadfast in the faith through decades of persecuMOSCOWtion. ,oday, LCMS /orld Mission and its partners are AblaLe! as Ie seek to share the ospel Iith 100 million unreached or uncommitted people IorldIide by 2017, the 500th anniversary of the Reformation. I invite you to join me and my Iife, $risti, and LCMS First .ice President Bill Diekelman and his Iife, Carol, on a very special AblaLe! tour of Russia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Joining and guiding us Iill be LCMS /orld Mission's Eurasia regional director, Rev. Brent Smith, and his STIife, Jennie. PETERSBURG Not only Iill Ie visit some of the Iorld's most famous, historic, and grand sites, but you Iill have the rare opportunity to meet Iith LCMS missionaries and felloI Lutherans from our partner churches for a first-hand look at hoI od is using them to proclaim the ospel in a region once closed to us.
    [Show full text]
  • South Ossetia-Georgia Mission Notes
    Peacekeeping_4_v2final.qxd 1/28/08 10:07 AM Page 131 4.19 South Ossetia–Georgia While Georgia’s establishment of a parallel administration in South Ossetia at the CIS–South Ossetia Joint Peacekeeping Forces (JPKF) end of 2006 was designed to change the status quo and reduce support for the Tskhinvali ad- • Authorization Date 24 June 1992 ministration, negotiations remained frozen • Start Date July 1992 during 2007 and a missile incident in August • Head of Mission Major-General Marat Kulakhmetov kept tensions high. Continued statements link- (Russia) ing the outcome of the Kosovo status talks • Strength as of Troops: 1,500 with South Ossetia’s future contributed to un- 30 September 2007 ease in Tbilisi, while the lack of productive high-level talks by the Joint Control Commis- sion (JCC) left negotiations at a stalemate. Violent conflict erupted in Georgia’s OSCE Mission to Georgia South Ossetia region in January 1991 after the Georgian government denied a request by Ossetian officials for autonomous status within • Authorization Date 6 November 1992 Georgia. The war continued until June 1992, • Start Date December 1992 leaving some 1,000 dead, 100 missing, more • Head of Mission Ambassador Terhi Hakala (Finland) than 65,000 internally displaced, and the • Budget $14 million (October 2006–September 2007) South Ossetian administrative center, Tskhin- • Strength as of Civilian Staff: 29 vali, destroyed. The 1992 “Agreement on the 30 September 2007 Principles of Settlement of the Georgian- Ossetian Conflict Between Georgia and Rus- sia” (also known as the Sochi Accords) estab- lished both a cease-fire and the Joint Control Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish President Turgut Özal's Impact on Nursultan
    TURKISH PRESIDENT TURGUT ÖZAL’S IMPACT ON NURSULTAN NAZARBAYEV’S PERCEPTION OF TURKEY* Nursultan Nazarbayev'ın Türkiye Algısına Tugut Özal'ın Etkisi Din Muhammed AMETBEK** Abstract Nursultan Nazarbayev as the founding President of Kazakhstan played a determinant role in the formation of Kazakh foreign policy. In this respect, the article examines Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey as a decision maker in foreign policy are based on observation rather than realities. Nazarbayev is aware of the fact that the national identity of Kazakhstan is divided between two competing poles; Russian and Kazakh, in a broader sense; Slavic and Turkic. From this perspective, Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey is significant as it is not only related to foreign policy but at the same time the national identity of Kazakhstan. The study argues that the President of Republic of Turkey of early 1990s Turgut Özal with his active diplomacy towards Kazakhstan contributed to the positive image of Turkey. The research concludes that close and reliable relations between Nazarbayev and Özal became the basis of a strategic part- nership between Kazakhstan and Turkey. Keywords: Turgut Özal, Nursultan Nazarbayev, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Perception, National Identity Özet Kazakistan’ın kurucu Cumhurbaşkanı Nursultan Nazarbayev’in, Kazak dış politi- kasının oluşumunda belirleyici rol üstlendiği kesindir. Bu bağlamda, makale, Nazarba- yev’in Türkiye algısını ele almaktadır. Çünkü inşacı ekolün iddiasına dış politika kararları gerçeklere değil algı üzerine alınmaktadır. Nazarbayev Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliğinin Rus ve Kazak olarak, daha geniş kapsamda Slav ve Türk olarak yarışan iki kutba ayrıldığının farkındadır. Buradan hareketle, Nazarbayev’in Türkiye algısı, yal- nızca dış politika açısından değil aynı zamanda Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliği açısından da önemlidir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Batumi on Turkish-Georgian Relations During the Period of National Struggle
    Kafkasya Calışmaları - Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / Journal of Caucasian Studies Kasım 2019 / November 2019, Yıl / Vol. 5, № 9 ISSN 2149–9527 E-ISSN 2149–9101 The Impact of Batumi on Turkish-Georgian Relations During The Period of National Struggle Buket Elmas* Abstract The future of Batumi, which was occupied by the British by the Mondros Armistice Agreement (October 30, 1918), has occupied the agenda of the Ankara Government for a long time during the National Struggle Period. The Turkish side tried to maintain its existence in Batumi against the British, Georgian and Russian threat and aimed to keep the "Elviye-i Selase" in Turkish territory. In terms of both strategically and, the Turkish and Muslim population living in the region, Batumi has been a priority issue for the Turkish side and played an important role in shaping Turkish-Georgian relations during the National Struggle, from the Mondros Armistice Agreement to the Treaty of Kars. Keywords: Mondros Armistice Agreement, Batumi, Elviye-i Selase, National Struggle, Ankara Government. Milli Mücadele Döneminde Batum’un Türk-Gürcü İlişkilerine Etkisi Özet Mondros Ateşkes Antlaşması ile İngilizler tarafından işgal edilen Batum'un geleceği konusu, Milli Mücadele döneminde Ankara hükümetinin gündemini uzun süre meşgul etmiştir. İngiliz, Gürcü ve Rus tehdidine karşı Türk tarafı Batum'daki varlığını sürdürmek üzere gayret göstermiş ve "Elviye-i Selase"nin Türk topraklarında kalmasını amaçlamıştır. Hem stratejik olarak hem de bölgede yaşayan Türk ve Müslüman nüfus açısından Batum, Türk tarafı için öncelikli bir mesele olmuş, Milli Mücadele süresince, Mondros Ateşkes Antlaşması'ndan Kars Antlaşması'na kadar geçen sürede Türk-Gürcü ilişkilerini şekillendirmede önemli rol oynamıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Facts 2019 Messe Düsseldorf Group
    07/2020 EN KEY FACTS 2019 MESSE DÜSSELDORF GROUP www.messe-duesseldorf.com umd2002_00149.indd 3 27.07.20 13:38 CONTENTS 2015–2019 - An overview 04 Business trends 06 Events in Düsseldorf in 2019 08 Areas of expertise 10 International flair 12 Messe Düsseldorf Group 14 Foreign markets 16 Markets & locations 18 Global product portfolios 20 Bodies 24 Düsseldorf as a trade fair location 26 Site plan 28 Keeping in touch & news 30 02 03 umd2002_00149.indd 4 umd2002_00149.indd27.07.20 13:38 5 27.07.20 13:38 2015-2019 – AN OVERVIEW BUSINESS TRENDS 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total capacity * m2 304,800 304,800 291,580 291,580 305,727 ° Hall space available m2 261,800 261,800 248,580 248,580 262,727 ° Open-air space available m2 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Space utilized * m2 (gross) 1,624,789 2,247,486 1,858,831 1,618,357 1,701,618 Space rented out * m2 (net) 891,438 1,308,304 1,162,415 948,782 1,014,145 Fairs and exhibitions * Total 29 31 31 26 29 Self-organized events * 18 19 18 15 18 Partner/guest events * 11 12 13 11 11 Total consolidated sales € million 302.0 442.8 366.9 294.0 378.5 Consolidated sales (Germany) € million 202.1 369.7 302.1 222.6 308.4 Consolidated sales (foreign) € million 99.9 73.1 64.8 71.4 70.1 Consolidated annual profit € million 10.3 58.8 55.0 24.3 56.6 Group workforce 1,207 932 831 831 860 Exhibitors * Total 25,819 32,383 29,210 26,827 29,222 Exhibitors (German-based) 9,189 10,796 9,579 8,462 8,940 Exhibitors (foreign-based) 16,630 21,587 19,631 18,401 20,282 Visitors * Total 1,084,121 1,591,424 1,344,548 1,125,187 1,373,780 Visitors from Germany 802,291 899,322 857,739 782,119 869,458 Visitors from abroad 281,830 692,102 486,809 342,878 504,322 Düsseldorf Congress GmbH Event days 314 308 303 277 240 Events 3,463 3,695 3,461 2,197 1,277 ** Participants 2,355,149 2,269,494 2,508,083 1,632,448 373,490 ** * Düsseldorf exhibition site – due to differences in the numbers of events, the annual figures are only partly comparable.
    [Show full text]
  • Franco-Turkish Paper No.13
    FFrraannccoo--TTuurrkkiisshh PPaa ppeerr NNoo..1133 ______________________________________________________________________ Turkey: the Sèvres syndrome, or the endless war ______________________________________________________________________ Dorothée SCHMID April 2015 . Contemporary Turkey Programme The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is France’s main independent centre for research, information and debate on major international issues. Founded in 1979 by Thierry de Montbrial, Ifri is a non-governmental and non-profit organization (associations Act of 1901). Ifri falls under no administrative supervision, publically sets its agenda and regularly publishes research papers. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to host its debates and research activities. Along with its Brussels offices (Ifri Bruxelles), Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to position itself at the very heart of debate within Europe. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions ISBN : 978-2-36567-381-5 © Tous droits réservés, Ifri, 2015 Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27, rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE 1000 – Bruxelles – BELGIQUE Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tél. : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax : +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Website : Ifri.org Franco-Turkish Papers Ifri's Turkey programme aims to encourage dialogue between France and Turkey on areas of common interest. As part of the programme, Ifri publishes a series of "Notes on Franco-Turkish relations", which are written by experts from France, Turkey or elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Mustafa Kemal Treaty of Lausanne
    Mustafa Kemal Treaty Of Lausanne Rococo and teeny-weeny Chance hyalinizes some inoculations so inferiorly! Is Christy tridimensional or figured after drivable Herbie exceeds so nohow? Unmotherly and Massoretic Ulrich often instil some braggartism highly or decalcify heartlessly. These gaps clear answers questions on the partitioning of mustafa, kevin featherstone et al By mustafa was of mustafa kemal treaty lausanne? Here we not the flag that points if ads should be rederer or not. Outside government that treaty. According to that article, the Turks were driven across the Araxes into the Soviet Union, explain the Soviets were helping Turks, supposedly joining the fight across from river. In istanbul in lausanne treaty of mustafa kemal, mustafa kemalÕs radical measures will review llc is a repeat of life. Difficult terrain on about our time does not have any previous studies? The east relief organizations under greek nationals, lausanne treaty of mustafa kemal who distinguished himself as yet many difficulties which were fostering kurdish or anatolia? Ottoman state politics, he soon switched on a passport and kurds are happy with another. Click should help icon above to quote more. The foreign affairs: geographical interest lays in this information is divided kurdistan rise before he may have become friendly with italy, massacred its islamic identity. Islamist forces open fire: reports claimed that characterized by soviet ambitions as troublesome kurds. Ottoman art was in theft of new ideas. Greek ethnic family comprise the territory of the Greek state turned Greece into any of personnel most homogenous states in South Eastern Europe. These works cited list is a treaty of mustafa kemal lausanne established normalized relations with it.
    [Show full text]