T4,4AA' 4FIED ICIASSIFIED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

T4,4AA' 4FIED ICIASSIFIED .Q0 • V244e- ­ jelfter Ak211/63 ,t4,4AA' 4FIED REPORT on JAPANESE DEFENSIVE PLAN for the A8 ISLAND of SAIPAN 2iCH.111V '030Vt1932J SOUTHERN MARIANAS Prepared by • ENGINEER, EXPEDITIONARY TROOPS (TASK FORCE 56) JULY-1944 • ,•• DOWNG'IRDF I7 FAR t:•111:11, 111LS: keGT NJ, 714,";1'. DE:21.fi3SIfIED. DOD Diii 5200.10 ICIASSIFIED Litho by Map Repro Unit UPS Rocky Mount Aug 1944 4 Instructors ReaC.in.2,- this.Document (File No. Name Date 0121/336 REPORT on .. ,43N Ed; 4, -' r 11 tielV 1,4 ti t4 !,1 I ,• JAPANESE DEFENSIVE.PLAN t ii '',. i:4- #t 't :httt t-i for 1. ,) #, THE ISLAND OF SAIPAN 1,-....:, , ...... — 1. Source of Inform This report is 'ase' upon obser econnaissance of defensive positions and installations from 21 June 1944, to 16 July 1944, conducted by and under the supervision of the Engineer, Expeditionary Troops, Task Force 56;from the results of interrogation of prisoner of war, Major Kiyoshi Yoshida,former intelligence officer, Japanese 43d Infantry Division; and from information contained in captured document, Northern Marianas Group Operation Order A-4, dated 24 May 1944. Two small reconnaissance teams provided by Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific Ocean Area, each in charge of a junior officer, and attached one team each, to the Second and Fourth Marine Divisions, assisted materially in this work. 2. General Conception. A joint Japanese Army and Navy garrison was charged with the defense of SAIPAN. The primary mission of the naval force which on D-day numbered approximately 4000, was the installation and manning of coast defense weapons and the defense of the Navy Sector in which was situated the depot of naval and coast defense stores. Orders prescribed that in the event of attack the command of coast defense batteries in Army Sectors would at once pass to the commanders of these respective sectors. The Army combat troops were estimated at 20,000 on D-day and were disposed in three sectors: Northern, Central and Southern. These three sectors and the Navy Sector are shown on attached map ANNEX A, based upon information taken from map attached to captured operation order. The failure of the Japanese garrison to successfully defend SAIPAN, while primarily attributable to the skillful leadership, and to the fighting qualities of our troops, was in a great measure due to the rapid pace of our thrust through the Gilbert and Marshall Groups, our bypassing of the Truk Group, and our unexpectedly early appearance in the Marianas. Every coastal defensive and antiaircraft battery position visited gave evidence of intensive activity in preparation for attack; not a single battery position or fortification was inspected in which the construction or installation was entirely complete. In many instances, casemates, emplacements, and magazines were less than half finished. In one case, a well-sited antiaircraft battery with well-built reinforced concrete emplacements lacked its weapons; in another, a battery of three (3) 140mm guns was found loaded on railway cars nearby GARAPAN NAVAL BASE, and another of three (3) 120mm dual purpose guns with the weapons in cosmoline lay on the ground nearby the partially excavated gun positions. In the GARA DEPOT were found the following items of ordnance. DOWNQRADIED AT 12 YEAR Nor AUTOMATICALLY DECLAS6IfIED: • 3 - 5 inch coast defense guns DOD DIE 5200.10 1- 140mm coast defense gun,(tube and carriage). 32- 120mm dual purpose guns,(tubes and carriages). 6 - 200mm mortars, complete. There can be little doubt that a large proportion, if not all of these weapons, were destined to be installed on SAIPAN. The effectiveness of our submarine.warfare, had doubtless contributed much to the delay in the shipment of construction material so vitally needed for fortification work. ••• The defense of the island evidently was premised upon the denial to landing forces of all beaches on the east and south shores, to the use of TANAPAG HARBOR, and to a dependence upon a mobile Army force to defeat enemy troops landed elsewhere. This assumption is supported by the location of permanent coast defense and dual purpose weapons, reinforced concrete blockhouses, and by the actions of the Japanese garrison once our troops had landed on Beaches RED, GREEN, BLUE and YELLOW. The enemy had placed great reliance upon his field artillery arm,- and once our drive had deprived him of the great bulk of these weapons, the dominant factor which delayed our attack was the advance over excessively rugged and difficult terrain. Likewise, this topography greatly favored the guerrilla tactics of the badly disorganized enemy forces. In spite of evidence of accelerated preparation of coast defenses, the Army garrison appeared neither well organized nor equipped. In this small theater so suitable for the employment of field artillery, the Japanese had neither horses nor mechanical prime movers designed to provide the mobility for this arm. Evidently the only means of movement were by rear drive trucks designed for use on roads, or by manpower. Both of these means obviously failed, as the bulk of field artillery was abandoned as the enemy withdrew northward. In his rapid withdrawal to the mountain fastness of the high mass extending northward from Hill 500, and dominated by MT. TAPOTCHAU,the Japanese forfeited any opportunity for maneuver. Thus, 0121/336 L' REPORT ON JAPANESE DEFENSIVE PLAN FOR-11 with artillery lost and a purely defensive role dictated he had no organized defensive positions to which to retire - only the precipitious terrain studded with cliffs and caves, and cut by numerous deep canyons generally crossing the direction of his retirement. Insofar as training in defensive warfare is concerned the Japanese Army forces displayed a lack of knowledge thereof almost astounding for modern troops. There was practically no evidence of organization of the ground; the principal airfield was practically undefended against ground troops, and on the night of D-day the enemy was unable to stage a counter-attack of sufficient strength to seriously affect our ultimate success. The lack of employment of beach obstacles and land mines were amazing. No mine fields of any consequence were found on any of the beaches used, and those found inland as the attack progressed were small, feeble, and relatively ineffectual. While two types of mines new to this force were encountered no large stocks were found. His initial employment of field artillery is worthy of note. On the first high ground and on the reverse slope thereof, three thousand (3000) yards southeast of Beaches GREEN and BLUE were massed sixteen (16) 105mm howitzers, and thirty (30) 75mm field pieces. Three thousand (3000) yards directly east of Beaah GREEN TWO was emplaced one (1)150mm howitzer battery of four (4) weapons, and three thousand (3000) yards directly east of Beach GREEN THREE was a like battery of four (4) howitzers. These weapons were particularly well sited and undoubtedly were responsible for much of the prolonged fire on the landing beaches. It is estimated that one battery alone had fired more than one thousand (1000) rounds. As previously pointed out, as our forces drove the bulk of the enemy northward, he abandoned most of his artillery, although he was able to continue to support his infantry by mortar fire. The only observed instance of field artillery emplaced on the shore was one (1) battery of four (4) 75mm light mountain guns in position practically on the beach one thousand (1000) yards southwest of the southern limits of CHARAN-KANOA, sited for fire on the channel through the reef just west of CHARAN-KANOA. This was one of the few known attempts of the enemy to make a stand at the beach. It is believed that this battery was silenced prior to D-day. On map of SAIPAN, ANNEX B, are shown beaches, and locations of massed enemy artillery. 3. Coast Defense Weapons and Beach Defenses. (1) Beginning at AGINGAN POINT at the most westerly extremity of the island and proceeding in a counter clockwise direction a description of coast defense weapons and beach defenses follows with photographs and sketches of the various installations.• Page numbers at end of each lettered subparagraphs are those on which photographs and/or drawings of installations described may be found. On overlay to Map of SAIPAN, ANNEX C, are shown the approximate locations of installations described, and, Map of SAIPAN, ANNEX B, with grid system may be used to further locate these with reference to terrain features. (a) One (1) battery of two (2)6 inch British, Whitworth Armstrong guns, Model 1900, located on AGINGAN POINT,(coordinates 03.4-14.5).. There was no indication that either of these guns had been fired. Tubes of both guns had been damaged by naval gunfire or aerial bombardment. Construction at this installation was incomplete. One gun was sited in completed reinforced concrete casemate. The walls and overhead cover in second casemate had not yet been poured. The fire control and range finder equipment for this battery were destroyed. Casemates limited the traverse of weapons to approximately 900 west to south. The ammunition storage facilities at the battery were very limited, although approximately one hundred (100) rounds were found in a cave six hundred (600) yards to the southeast. One gun was sited for fire on the channel between SAIPAN and TINIAN, and the other on the approaches to beaches RED; GREEN,BLUE and YELLOW.(See page 12). (b) A reinforced concrete blockhouse generally rectangular in shape, 28 ft. by 26 ft. provided with one (1) gun compartment and embrasure, was found four hundred (400) yards southeast of AGINGAN POINT,(coordinates 03.7-14.3). This small fortification suitable for a 20mm On was well sited for fire on Beach WHITE ONE.
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Arrow-Loops in the Great Tower of Kenilworth Castle: Symbolism Vs Active/Passive ‘Defence’
    Arrow-loops in the Great Tower of Kenilworth castle: Symbolism vs Active/Passive ‘Defence’ Arrow-loops in the Great Tower of Kenilworth ground below (Fig. 7, for which I am indebted to castle: Symbolism vs Active/Passive ‘Defence’ Dr. Richard K Morris). Those on the west side have hatchet-shaped bases, a cross-slit and no in- Derek Renn ternal seats. Lunn’s Tower, at the north-east angle It is surprising how few Norman castles exhibit of the outer curtain wall, is roughly octagonal, arrow-loops (that is, tall vertical slits, cut through with shallow angle buttresses tapering into a walls, widening internally (embrasure), some- broad plinth. It has arrow-loops at three levels, times with ancillary features such as a wider and some with cross-slits and badly-cut splayed bases. higher casemate. Even if their everyday purpose Toy attributed the widening at the foot of each was to simply to admit light and air, such loops loop to later re-cutting. When were these altera- could be used profitably by archers defending the tions (if alterations they be)7 carried out, and for castle. The earliest examples surviving in Eng- what reason ? He suggested ‘in the thirteenth cen- land seem to be those (of uncommon forms) in tury, to give crossbows [... ] greater play from the square wall towers of Dover castle (1185-90), side to side’, but this must be challenged. Greater and in the walls and towers of Framlingham cas- play would need a widening of the embrasure be- tle, although there may once have been slightly hind the slit.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology at South Adger's Wharf: a Study of the Redan at Tradd Street
    Archaeology at South Adger’s Wharf: A Study of the Redan at Tradd Street By Nicholas Butler Eric Poplin Katherine Pemberton Martha Zierden The Walled City Task Force Archaeological Contributions 45 The Charleston Museum October 2012 Prepared for the City of Charleston and Mayor Riley’s Walled City Task Force Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction . 1 The Walled City Task Force . 2 The Walled City . 2 The Present Project . 4 Research Issues . 5 Chapter II: Historical Background . 9 Early Charleston . 9 Charleston’s Colonial Defenses . 13 Eighteenth Century Charleston . 17 Charleston’s Colonial Markets . 23 Charleston’s Commercial Waterfront . 27 Chapter III: Fieldwork . 35 Site Description . 35 Excavations in 2008 . 36 Stratigraphy: Trench 1 and Unit 1 . 41 Trench 2 . 46 Trench 3 and Units 3 and 4 . 49 Stratigraphic Summary . 50 Fieldwork 2009 . 51 Stratigraphic Sequence . 53 Features and Horizontal Patterning . 58 Deep Excavations . 63 Chapter IV: Cultural Materials . 67 Laboratory Methods . 67 Analysis . 68 The Material Assemblage . 69 Olive Green glass . 69 Coarse Earthenwares . 70 Utilitarian Stonewares . 77 Table and Tea Ceramics . 79 Colono Ware . 90 Bottle Glass . 94 Pharmaceutical Glass . 95 Table Glass . 96 Other Kitchen Items . 98 Architectural Materials . 99 Arms . 100 Clothing . 101 Personal Items . 103 Furniture . 104 ii Tobacco Pipes . 105 Activities . 106 Ecofacts . 108 Zone 10 Assemblage . 108 Organic Materials . 110 Chapter V: Architecture of the Walled City . 115 Architecture of the Tradd Street Redan . 120 Granville Bastion . 125 Granville Bastion to Ashley Bastion . 126 The Half Moon Battery . 128 Carteret Bastion . 131 City Gate and Johnson’s Ravelin . 133 Summary . 134 Chapter VI: The Lower Market .
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Current State- Of-Art on Protection
    REPORT ON THE CURRENT STATE- OF-ART ON PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL RUINS D.T1.1.1 12/2017 Table of contents: 1. INTRODUCTION - THE SCOPE AND STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ........................................................................... 3 2. HISTORIC RUIN IN THE SCOPE OF THE CONSERVATION THEORY ........................................................................... 5 2.1 Permanent ruin as a form of securing a historic ruin .................................................................... 5 2.2 "Historic ruin" vs. "contemporary ruin" ............................................................................................ 6 2.3 Limitations characterizing historic ruins ....................................................................................... 10 2.4 Terminology of the conservation activities on damaged objects ............................................... 12 3. RESEARCH ON HISTORIC RUINS ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1. Stocktaking measurements ............................................................................................................. 14 3.1.1. Traditional measuring techniques .............................................................................................. 17 3.1.2. Geodetic method ............................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.3. Traditional, spherical, and photography
    [Show full text]
  • Neville Trueman the Pioneer Preacher
    Neville Trueman the Pioneer Preacher William Henry Withrow The Project Gutenberg EBook of Neville Trueman the Pioneer Preacher by William Henry Withrow Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the header without written permission. Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. **Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** **eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** *****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** Title: Neville Trueman the Pioneer Preacher Author: William Henry Withrow Release Date: November, 2004 [EBook #6826] [Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule] [This file was first posted on January 28, 2003] Edition: 10 Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NEVILLE TRUEMAN *** Produced by Seth Hadley, Juliet Sutherland, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. This file was produced from images generously made available by the Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions. NEVILLE TRUEMAN, THE PIONEER PREACHER. A TALE OF THE WAR OF 1812. BY THE REV.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    www.nysmm.org Glossary of Terms Some definitions have links to images. ABATIS: Barricade of felled trees with their branches towards the attack and sharpened (primitive version of "barbed wire"). ARROW SLITS: Narrow openings in a wall through which defenders can fire arrows. (also called loopholes) ARTILLERY: An excellent GLOSSARY for Civil War era (and other) Artillery terminologies can be found at civilwarartillery.com/main.htm (Link will open new window.) BAILEY: The walled enclosure or the outer courtyard of a castle. (Ward, Parade) BANQUETTE: The step of earth within the parapet, sufficiently high to enable standing defenders to fire over the crest of the parapet with ease. BARBICAN: Outworks, especially in front of a gate. A heavily fortified gate or tower. BARTIZAN (BARTISAN): Scottish term, projecting corner turret. A small overhanging turret on a tower s battlement. BASTION: A projection from a fortification arranged to give a wider range of fire or to allow firing along the main walls. Usually at the intersection of two walls. BATTER: Inclined face of a wall (Talus). BATTERED: May be used to describe crenellations. BATTERY: A section of guns, a named part of the main fortifications or a separate outer works position (e.g.. North Battery, Water Battery). BATTLEMENTS: The notched top (crenellated parapet) of a defensive wall, with open spaces (crenels) for firing weapons. BEAKED PROJECTION: see EN BEC. BELVEDERE: A pavilion or raised turret. BLOCKHOUSE: Usually a two story wood building with an overhanging second floor and rifle loops and could also have cannon ports (embrasures). Some three story versions. Some with corner projections similar to bastions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605
    Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605 A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew de la Garza Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin, Advisor; Stephen Dale; Jennifer Siegel Copyright by Andrew de la Garza 2010 Abstract This doctoral dissertation, Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, examines the transformation of warfare in South Asia during the foundation and consolidation of the Mughal Empire. It emphasizes the practical specifics of how the Imperial army waged war and prepared for war—technology, tactics, operations, training and logistics. These are topics poorly covered in the existing Mughal historiography, which primarily addresses military affairs through their background and context— cultural, political and economic. I argue that events in India during this period in many ways paralleled the early stages of the ongoing “Military Revolution” in early modern Europe. The Mughals effectively combined the martial implements and practices of Europe, Central Asia and India into a model that was well suited for the unique demands and challenges of their setting. ii Dedication This document is dedicated to John Nira. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor John F. Guilmartin and the other members of my committee, Professors Stephen Dale and Jennifer Siegel, for their invaluable advice and assistance. I am also grateful to the many other colleagues, both faculty and graduate students, who helped me in so many ways during this long, challenging process.
    [Show full text]
  • “Gateway to the Past”: Designing AR-Enriched Brno City Guide to Historical Gates
    “Gateway to the Past”: Designing AR-enriched Brno City Guide to Historical Gates Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics Bachelor’s Thesis Spring 2020 Júlia Gonová Declaration Hereby I declare that this thesis is my original authorial work, which I have worked out on my own. All sources, references, and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Júlia Gonová Supervisor: MgA. Helena Lukášová, ArtD. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, MgA. Helena Lukášová, ArtD., for her kind guidance, advice and support throughout this whole process. My thanks also goes to the employees of NPÚ ÚOP in Brno and Muzeum města Brna for providing me with relevant historical information. Last but definitely not least, I want to express my gratitude to my parents for everything they have given me and for never once wavering in their conviction that I will finish this work, and my brothers, for helping, supporting, and believing in me in their own brotherly way. Abstract This work focuses on the design and development of an interactive city history guide using augmented reality. To overcome the need for special devices or dedicated applications, the augmented reality aspect of this work is facilitated through a platform-independent web application. The printed guide provides basic information about the main topic, the historical gates of Brno, as well as their likenesses as 2D images. At the same time, the web application enriches the experience by supplying interactive 3D models of the gates in augmented reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on USSR Military Forces, Chapter VI: Fortifications War Department (USA)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln DOD Military Intelligence U.S. Department of Defense 1-1946 Handbook on USSR Military Forces, Chapter VI: Fortifications War Department (USA) Robert L. Bolin , Depositor University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dodmilintel War Department (USA) and Bolin, Robert L. , Depositor, "Handbook on USSR Military Forces, Chapter VI: Fortifications" (1946). DOD Military Intelligence. 27. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dodmilintel/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in DOD Military Intelligence by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Technical Manual, TM 30-430 Handbook on USSR Military Forces Chapter VI Fortifications Robert L. Bolin, Depositor University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Technical Manual, TM 30-430, Chapter VI 1 January 1946 Handbook on USSR Military Forces Chapter VI Fortifications War Department Washington, DC Comments The copy digitized was borrowed from the Marshall Center Research Library, APO, AE 09053-4502. Abstract TM 30-340, Handbook on USSR Military Forces, was “published in installments to expedite dissemination to the field.” TM30-430, Chapter VI, 1 January 1946, “Fortifications,” is a detailed discussion of earthworks and structures used for defensive purposes. This chapter is illustrated with numerous drawings, diagrams, and charts. This manual is listed in WorldCat under Accession Number: OCLC: 19989681 1 Jan 46 TM 30-430 CHAPTER VI FORTIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Figure Section I.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 Buthan06.Xp
    SLSA Jahresbericht 2009 Bhutan-Swiss archaeological excavation project 200 8–2010 Drapham Dzong, Bhutan. Report 2009 . Werner Meyer Introduction Silvia Scheuerer and Kuenga Wangmo In collaboration with Nagtsho Dorji and Sonam Tashi The Drapham Dzong is located in the Bumthang district in Central Bhutan on a moun - tain ledge in the Chamkhar Chhu valley (exact positio n: N27° 39 ' 15.4", E 90 º 45 ' 14.9", heigh t: approx. 2,930 m.a.s.l .). The elongated mountain ledge is steep on all sides and in places, the rock forms the foundation of the wall. An ancient valley path leads across the col, east of the fortress hill. The entire site is divided into two topographical parts – a mountain fortress and a projecting, fortified settlement in the south-east. The fortress consists of three layer s: a main and an upper castle, a lower castle, and advanced outer baileys situated in the north and the south. Two staircases fortified by towers connect the southern outer bailey with the valley settlement. The mountain fortress is 200 m long, measured along the longitudinal axis which approximately lies in the north-south direction. The archaeological excavation of Drapham Dzong is a major project, undertaken by the Ministry of Home and Culture Affairs of the Royal Government of Bhutan and Hel vetas Bhutan, in collaboration with the SLSA . It successfully began its first excava - tion in autumn 2008 under the scientific direction of Prof. Dr. Werner Meyer from the University of Basel. The compensation of salaries for the Basle team during the exca - vation period in 2009 was taken over by the Basle foundation FAG (Freiwillige Aka de - mi sche Gesellschaf t).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact Off Crusader Castles Upon European Western Castles
    THE IMPACT OF CRUSADER CASTLES UPON EUROPEAN WESTERN CASTLES IN THE MIDDLE AGES JORDAN HAMPE MAY 2009 A SENIOR PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- LA CROSSE Abstract: During the Middle Ages, the period from roughly AD 1000-1450, the structure of castles changed greatly from wooden motte and bailey to stone keeps and defenses within stone city walls. The reason for the change was largely influenced by the crusades as Europeans went to the Holy Lands to conquer. In addition to conquering, these kings brought back a new way of designing and fortifying their castles in England, Wales and France. Without the influence of the crusades, what we think of as true middle age castles would not exist. For my paper I will analyze the impact the crusades had on forming the middle age castles by evidence surviving in the archaeological record from before and after the crusades as well as modifications done on castles to accommodate crusader changes to show the drastic influence of crusader castle fortifications upon English, Welsh and French castles. 1 Introduction Construction of what is believed to be true middle age castles from A.D. 1000 to 1450 began as kings arrived back from the crusades to the Holy Lands, bringing with them ideas of how to make their castles grander and more easily defensible. Before the crusades William I of England was beginning to develop a new concentric style of castle beginning with the Tower of London. After the crusades many English, Welsh and French kings took the concentric concept and combined it with what they saw on the crusades and developed it to become majestic castles and fortresses like Chateau Gaillard in France, Dover Castle in England, and Caernarvon Castle in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Report: Fort Ward Northwest Bastion
    w y Fort Ward Alexandria Pirginie j yYGrY Exploratory Egoavation rt oP the Northwest Bastion f JuneJuly 1961 t rte a 1 3 Yti 1 by Edward Mob4 Larrabee Contraoting Arohaeologist August 26 1981 f3 4x t irrk r x gr d 51 th7c3yyri St7 RY KYs p i zx vtc U x I 1 I O i i I rC 1 o I t d Q o 1 u i i a o moo I W V e a iw i i r i 1 Historic Drawin Ys g No plans for the Wooden Gnte of Fort Ward 141 170 wl Table ofContents List of Drawings and Maps i List or Photographs li Aolmowledgements 1 I Introduction and Description Projeot History Working 9ohedule and Crew Site Description gho rt His tory4 II Esoavation and Findings A Filling Room 12 B Powder Magazine 16 C Parapet and Ditoh 24 D Gun 1lnbrasure 30 E Auger Test Line 33 III Sample Reoonstruotion 36 N Cono lus ions A Summary oP Structures an dFindings44 B Archaeologioal Conclusions 46 C ldfilitary Engineering48 D Historioal Conolusions 54 56 Appendix I Descriptive Terminology Appendix II List of ftis torio Iiaps 60 65 Appendix I II Outlying Struo to res Appendix IP Table oP ArtiPaots 67 r a SG o List of Drawings and Maps T b k y1 f Fart 1 His torso Drawing 170141Gate of WardFroatispLeoe gistorio Drawing 139170Original Contours6 3 Prot ile of Filling Room 14 4 Profile of Powder Magazine 19 i 5 Profile ofParapet and Ditah 28 fig Plan of Gun Embrasure 32 34 7 Profile oP Auger Line 8 Historic Drawing 170141Old Fart early stage51 t later 9 Histor is Drawing 170 133 Old Fort stage z t Final Plan53 10 Historic Drawing 171104New Fort 11 Drawing to Illustrate Terminology 59 end of 12 Plaa of Northwest Bastion
    [Show full text]