DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hlučín-Darkovičky CS Fortification Complex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hlučín-Darkovičky CS Fortification Complex The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex 1 The Hlučín-Darkovičky CS Fortification Complex Guide 2 The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex 3 The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex is a uni- que artefact of its type, and of immense value in a European context. The Fortification Complex is an exhibition of military technology that gives visitors the opportunity to find out about a major aspect of the history of the first half of the 20th century. The Czechoslovak Fortification Complex in Hlučín-Darkovičky has been part of the Silesian Museum since 1992. It forms one of the museum’s six exhibition premises, with a close thematic link to the national Second World War Memorial in nearby Hrabyně. In the context of the Silesian Museum, the Fortification Com- plex is specific in that, while it is located in the countryside, its the- matic focus is relatively unconventional within its category. It includes a group of structures that were created as part of the Czechoslovak border defence system, and which are amongst the most interesting in the Czech Republic and the best-preserved in Europe. The Com- plex consists of five structures, both one-sided and two-sided, of vari- ous types and durability grades. Experts are therefore able to present the battlefield and individual structures, both in the condition and with the fittings as they were in 1938, as well as the condition they were in at the end of the war. The complex is also symbolic of key events in Czechoslovak history, being, as it is, closely linked to the Munich Agreement and loss of the Sudetenland, and therefore one of the most dramatic mo- ments in the history of Silesia. Installation of left-hand bell-chamber in MO-S 19 Alej (20 May 1986) 4 The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex 5 Construction of the border fortifications The second half of the 1930s was a time of rising international tension and increasing instability, caused by the militaristic policies of Hitler’s Germany after 1933. In order to protect its democratic system, territorial integrity and national sovereignty Czechoslovakia, which was particularly threatened, began the construction of a massive system of permanent border fortifications. The reinforced-concrete fortresses with their military crews, together with other units of the Czechoslovakian army, were intended to ensure the effective protection of the state, which was threate- ned by the military aggression of Nazi Germany. The greatest threat along the then Czechoslovak-German borders, and the strategic priority, was along the northern zone stretching from Bohumín to Děčín. It was in this region, in the area between the towns of Bohumín and Háj ve Slezsku, that the construction of heavy fortifications was begun in 1935. Map of MO (Moravská Ostrava) sector of fortification system The construction of fortifications was under the fence Ministry, was responsible for construction works. control of Engineering Command II (Ženijní skupinové The first commander of ŽSV II was Maj. Antonín Sameš, velitelství (ŽSV)), based in Bohumín and Hlučín-Dlouhá who on 20th August 1937 was given command of the Ves. This body was directly subordinate to the Directo- newly-created ŽSV VI in Trutnov; he was replaced by Lt.- rate of Fortifications, which, as part of the National De- Col. Josef Libnar. Map of Czechoslovak fortifications The next three years, culminating in September The distinguishing factor of the ‘MO’ (Moravská 1938, saw the construction, fitting and, chiefly, arming Ostrava) sector was that during its construction the au- of forty heavy-duty forts, including one artillery fort thorities sought to refine the design for future stages of and several embedded type-37 A casemates with en- the fortification system as a whole. While its form was, hanced fortifications (known colloquially as ‘řopíky’ after initially, heavily influenced by the French ‘Maginot Line’, ŘOP, the Czechoslovakian Directorate of Fortifications). this was increasingly simplified and improved over time An integrated system of obstacles and a cable telephone so that the maximum level of defence could be achieved network were also built, as well as barracks for Border at reasonable cost. Regiment 4 in Hlučín. MO-S 18 Obora as it is today 6 The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex 7 Consequences of the Munich Agreement and the Fortification Old tree-stumps were also removed from the vi- A car park was constructed and a digger used to cinity of the blockhouse and a bridge was constructed clear the anti-tank ditches on both sides of the fortress, Complex during the war over the ditch that had been created following the re- which had been choked up for years with soil and waste. moval of rocks in the rear part of the blockhouse, pro- The open space around Alej was filled with obstacles, Following the Munich Agreement of 30th September consisted of nearly 10 thousand light structures, intend- viding temporary access to the interior of the structure. chiefly concrete cones and steel ‘hedgehogs’. 1938, Czechoslovakia was compelled to cede its bor- ed as a temporary defensive shield for infantry, and 263 In the next phase of reconstruction, armour plating was The first structure to accept visitors was a řopík, the der territories – the Sudetenland – to Germany. This heavy structures, intended to be permanently manned taken, with the permission of the Regional Housing and interior of which was fitted with technical equipment, resulted in the annexation of areas in which over 50% and equipped for long-term resistance. Construction Office in Olomouc, from the fortresses in including weapons. The interior was ‘christened’ on 28th of the population was German to the Third Reich. Nazi The border region was subsequently occupied by Milostovice as a replacement for plating that had been May 1985. The exhibition premises then commenced full Germany argued that the Sudeten German regions German forces. All armoured components were removed removed by the occupying forces in 1940. operations on 28th September 1988. should be reunited with the Reich; however, these areas and later utilised by the German army and industry. In the had belonged to the Czech crown since the 10th century. years 1944–1945 the German army started to repair and This agreement, made between Germany, Great Britain, improvise the arming of the fortifications in an effort to France and Italy, led to the loss by Czechoslovakia of build the so-called Moravian Defensive Gate and Jeseníky a total 41,098 km2 of territory and 4,879,000 inhabitants. Barrier Zone in response to the approach of the Red Army. At the same time, however, it lost its border forti- The sophistication of the pre-war Czechoslovak fortifica- fication system. All facilities had to be surrendered with- tions system was demonstrated by the heavy fighting out a fight. Although the network was not complete (a that took place for control of the system during the sub- total of 15,463 heavy and 1,276 light structures were sequent battle for the Ostrava region, which was the most planned, with the final stage of construction scheduled intense military operation on the territory of Czechoslo- for 1946), it was, nevertheless, relatively extensive, and vakia and one that cost many lives. Renewal and opening of the fortifications At a relatively early stage after the end of the war, a num- goal it was to refurbish several, selected fortification ber of people started to show an interest in the rows structures. On 28th June 1984 the group took charge of reinforced-concrete defensive structures from the of four different types of structure, the future Hlučín- 1930s. However, due to more urgent tasks associated Darkovičky Fortifications Complex, and the three-mem- with regenerating the country, the structures gradually ber working group commenced reconstruction work fell into disrepair or had their fittings stolen. together with other volunteers. In the 1970s, however, the situation started to The relevant plans of structures and their fittings MO–S 19 Alej in 1984 change and there was growing interest in the refurbish- were provided by the Military Archive in Prague. The ment of the structures. It was at this time that the first, Alej structure, for example, necessitated the removal of often informal, groups of enthusiasts came into being; most of the trees and bushes that had grown up around these groups showed remarkable dedication in refur- it, forming a relatively thick growth blocking the view of bishing individual fortresses, for example in the Náchod, the fortress. Kralice, Ostrava and Opava regions. Military history and fortress enthusiasts devoted the greatest amount of attention to the group of for- tresses located north of Hlučín, between the villages of Markvartovice, Šilheřovice, Darkovice and Darkovičky. These fortresses lay in ruins and it was clear that the pro- cess of reconstruction would not be an easy one. How- ever, these fortresses included various types of struc- ture, varying degrees of durability, one- and two-sided structures with varying types of armament, and were relatively easily accessible. The refurbishment of the Fortifications Complex began in 1980, when the then newly-created Museum of the Revolutionary Struggle and Liberation in Ostrava created a working group, headed by Jan Polášek, whose Jan Polášek next to generator in MO-S Alej, 1985 Jan Polášek and Jindřich Czeniek next to a řopík in 1985. 8 The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex The Hlučín-Darkovičky Czechoslovak Fortification Complex 9 Exhibition Infantry blockhouse MO-S 19 Alej The Hlučín-Darkovičky Fortification Complex consists of five structures. The main structure in the Complex is MO-S 19 Alej, which is a two-sided, two-winged, two-floored, independent infantry blockhouse, with two bells and a gun turret, supplemented by the MO-17 Štípky, MO-S 18 Obora and MO-S 20 Orel heavy structures and the embedded, enhanced type-37A 140 Z casemate, known as a řopík.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Arrow-Loops in the Great Tower of Kenilworth Castle: Symbolism Vs Active/Passive ‘Defence’
    Arrow-loops in the Great Tower of Kenilworth castle: Symbolism vs Active/Passive ‘Defence’ Arrow-loops in the Great Tower of Kenilworth ground below (Fig. 7, for which I am indebted to castle: Symbolism vs Active/Passive ‘Defence’ Dr. Richard K Morris). Those on the west side have hatchet-shaped bases, a cross-slit and no in- Derek Renn ternal seats. Lunn’s Tower, at the north-east angle It is surprising how few Norman castles exhibit of the outer curtain wall, is roughly octagonal, arrow-loops (that is, tall vertical slits, cut through with shallow angle buttresses tapering into a walls, widening internally (embrasure), some- broad plinth. It has arrow-loops at three levels, times with ancillary features such as a wider and some with cross-slits and badly-cut splayed bases. higher casemate. Even if their everyday purpose Toy attributed the widening at the foot of each was to simply to admit light and air, such loops loop to later re-cutting. When were these altera- could be used profitably by archers defending the tions (if alterations they be)7 carried out, and for castle. The earliest examples surviving in Eng- what reason ? He suggested ‘in the thirteenth cen- land seem to be those (of uncommon forms) in tury, to give crossbows [... ] greater play from the square wall towers of Dover castle (1185-90), side to side’, but this must be challenged. Greater and in the walls and towers of Framlingham cas- play would need a widening of the embrasure be- tle, although there may once have been slightly hind the slit.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaching the Siegfried Line
    ^ r ♦ 6 \o <• / / y f r ♦ r y ' *- 4 ■, .■ / s \. 4 REPORT 0 n •K BREACHING 4 of the SIEGFRIED LINE Prepared by Engineer Section, XVIII Corps (Airborne) * . 28 January 1945 V, ; & X . ‘i RESTRICTS D 4 REPORT ON BREACHING THE SIEGFRIED LINE : . ■^1 INDEX PAGE 1. Introduction 2. Description of line 4?.'' 1' 3. Methods of Breaching ^ . 3 a. V Corps 3 h. VII Corps 5 c* XIX Corps 8 d. 30th Inf Div 13 e. Engineer School. Study 15 4* Miscellaneous 20 5. Conclusions 20 ILLUSTRATIONS ■ ' : Plats: PAGE ' I.; ;Anti-Tan}c. Ditch la ■« :^2* Curved Rail Obstacle 2a . 3V' Dragons Teeth 2a ; - ' ^ :4. ' Dragons Teeth /;V ' .2a ' , Large 'Type Eiahrasures 2a MG. Embrasure ,' 2a 7• Fill-Boi Disguised as Electrical Substation 2a 8. Steel Observation and MG Turret 4a 9* Typical Pillbox; Installation in Forest 4a 10. Road Passage Thru Anti-Tank Obstacle 5a 11. Steel Obstacle ■, 5a 12. Large Type Steel Cupola with Periscope 8a 13. General View Pillboxes 8a 14. »» n 9a 15. ti . n fi 9a 16. n n .• n 12a 17. Typical Pillbox 12a 18. View of Disguised Pill Box 13a ■ •; RESTRICTED •! L A. \ rI K « i ' ■P t > i ' *• 1 I - ^ ' • 1. *= i-.* '■ r ' > \ SOURCE : Ml'lO WAR OFFICE PLATE 1. ANTI-TANK DITCH f f V ■■> i i V t •l I / la / f RESTRICTED HEADQUARTERS XVIII CORPS (AIRBORNE) Office of the Engineer A.P.0, 109, U, S, Army 2S January 1945 REPORT ON BREACHING OF THE SIEGFRIED LINE 1, INTRODUCTION: a. SOURCES: This pamphlet is a compilation of intelligence made available to this Headquarters by First Army, V Corps, VII Corps, XEC Corps and 30th Inf, Div.
    [Show full text]
  • Demshuk CV2020-Extended
    ANDREW THOMAS DEMSHUK, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History Battelle-Tompkins Hall, 119 American University 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20016 Peer-Reviewed Monographs: Three Cities after Hitler: Redemptive Reconstruction across Cold War Borders (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, forthcoming 2022). Bowling for Communism: Urban Ingenuity at the End of East Germany (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, forthcoming October 2020). Demolition on Karl Marx Square: Cultural Barbarism and the People’s State in 1968 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2017). The Lost German East: Forced Migration and the Politics of Memory, 1945-1970 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012). Paperback Edition, 2014. Co-Editor and Contributor: “The Voice of the Lost German East: Heimat Bells as Soundscapes of Memory,” in Cultural Landscapes: Transatlantische Perspektiven auf Wirkungen und Auswirkungen deutscher Kultur und Geschichte im östlichen Europa, ed. Andrew Demshuk and Tobias Weger (Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2015). Current Book-Length Projects: “Alien Homeland: Human Encounters after Forced Migration on a German-Polish Borderland, 1970-1990” Peer-Reviewed Articles: “The People’s Bowling Palace: Building Underground in Late Communist Leipzig,” Contemporary European History 29, no. 3 (August 2020): 339-355. “A Polish Approach for German Cities? Cement Old Towns and the Search for Rootedness in Postwar Leipzig and Frankfurt/Main,” European History Quarterly 50, no. 1 (Jan. 2020): 88-127. “Rebuilding after the Reich: Sacred Sites in Frankfurt, Leipzig, and Wrocław, 1945-1949,” in War and the City: The Urban Context of Conflict and Mass Destruction, ed. Tim Keogh (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2019): 167-193.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology at South Adger's Wharf: a Study of the Redan at Tradd Street
    Archaeology at South Adger’s Wharf: A Study of the Redan at Tradd Street By Nicholas Butler Eric Poplin Katherine Pemberton Martha Zierden The Walled City Task Force Archaeological Contributions 45 The Charleston Museum October 2012 Prepared for the City of Charleston and Mayor Riley’s Walled City Task Force Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction . 1 The Walled City Task Force . 2 The Walled City . 2 The Present Project . 4 Research Issues . 5 Chapter II: Historical Background . 9 Early Charleston . 9 Charleston’s Colonial Defenses . 13 Eighteenth Century Charleston . 17 Charleston’s Colonial Markets . 23 Charleston’s Commercial Waterfront . 27 Chapter III: Fieldwork . 35 Site Description . 35 Excavations in 2008 . 36 Stratigraphy: Trench 1 and Unit 1 . 41 Trench 2 . 46 Trench 3 and Units 3 and 4 . 49 Stratigraphic Summary . 50 Fieldwork 2009 . 51 Stratigraphic Sequence . 53 Features and Horizontal Patterning . 58 Deep Excavations . 63 Chapter IV: Cultural Materials . 67 Laboratory Methods . 67 Analysis . 68 The Material Assemblage . 69 Olive Green glass . 69 Coarse Earthenwares . 70 Utilitarian Stonewares . 77 Table and Tea Ceramics . 79 Colono Ware . 90 Bottle Glass . 94 Pharmaceutical Glass . 95 Table Glass . 96 Other Kitchen Items . 98 Architectural Materials . 99 Arms . 100 Clothing . 101 Personal Items . 103 Furniture . 104 ii Tobacco Pipes . 105 Activities . 106 Ecofacts . 108 Zone 10 Assemblage . 108 Organic Materials . 110 Chapter V: Architecture of the Walled City . 115 Architecture of the Tradd Street Redan . 120 Granville Bastion . 125 Granville Bastion to Ashley Bastion . 126 The Half Moon Battery . 128 Carteret Bastion . 131 City Gate and Johnson’s Ravelin . 133 Summary . 134 Chapter VI: The Lower Market .
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Sciophila Meigen from the Czech and Slovak Republics (Diptera: Mycetophilidae)
    Cas. Skz. Muz. Opava (A), 54: 69-74.2005 New records of Sciophila Meigen from the Czech and Slovak Republics (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) Jan Sev~fk New records of Sciophila Meigen from the Czech and Slovak Republics (Diptern: Mycerophilidae). - Cas. Slez. Muz. Opava, 54: 69-74,2005. A b S t r a c t : Eight species of Sciophila Meigen are recorded for the first time from the tenitory of the Czech Republic and 5 from Slovakia. Further 6 species are for the first time recorded from Moravia and Silesia. Photographs of the male terminalis of four rare species are also presented. K e Y W 0 r d : Sciaroidca, fungus gnats, distribution, new records. The genus Sciophila Meigen, l818 comprises about 132 described species (Soli 1997). Holmtic species of Sciophila were revised by Zaitzev (1982). Czech and Slovak species of this genus have not yet been reviewed and the last checklist (KoHel et al. 1997) comprises less than a half of the actual number of species known to occur in these countries. In this paper, new records of Sciophila from the Czech Republic and from Slovakia are presen- ted, including species new to particular major regions, i. e. Bohemia and Moravia & Silesia. Abbreviations: CoUections examined: JS - coll. Jan SevEik, Czech Republic (private collection); MMB - coll. Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic; SMO - coll. Silesian Museum, Opava, Czech Republic. Collecting methods: MT = Malaise trap, R = rearing from fungi, SW = sweep netting, YFT = yellow pan traps. CZ = Czech Republic. SK = Slovakia. SURVEY OF SPECIES Sciophila adarnsi Edwards, 1925 (Fig. 1) Material examined. CZ: Bohemia, ~umavaMts., Nova Hirka, peat-bog, 18.5.-15.6.1999, 310, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincorion Gun Turret Drives. Exact and Quick Weapon Stabilization
    SOLUTIONS. TAILORED. VINCORION GUN TURRET DRIVES. EXACT AND QUICK WEAPON STABILIZATION. A wide range of applications: Gun Turret Drives come in: VINCORION delivers essen- The Gun Turret Drives product family. tial systems to battle tanks and fighting vehicles that are deployed in armed forces all over the world. These include There is nothing more critical than for modern combat the GTdrive® turret and weapon controls for extra-large, vehicles to be able to react quickly to surrounding con- large, medium and remotely operated weapon systems, ditions. So, the quickest target sighting, acquisition, which – founded on the most modern control technology tracing, and proper positioning of the main armament is and digitally configurable systems – form the basis for a vital for the foremost goal: a first-round hit. To achieve highly precise aiming and stabilization system, allowing this, the sights, targeting devices, and weapon systems alignment movements to be automatically stabilized or must be decoupled from the vehicle movements. In other manually controlled for absolute precision. words, they must be perfectly stabilized. That’s where our The GTdrive® product family of electrical systems for GTDRIVE® ELECTRIC DRIVES aiming, stabilization, and slaving of armaments has a wide range of applications for reconnaissance and combat – The elevation drive aligns the weapon in the vertical in light and heavy fighting vehicles. It covers a variety of direction drive systems – from spindle to spur gear – to meet the – The azimuth drive aligns the turret in the horizontal different mechanical interfaces. Its high reliability together direction with optimized life-cycle costs gives it the leading edge – According to the signal of the stabilization and power our customers truly value.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Current State- Of-Art on Protection
    REPORT ON THE CURRENT STATE- OF-ART ON PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL RUINS D.T1.1.1 12/2017 Table of contents: 1. INTRODUCTION - THE SCOPE AND STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ........................................................................... 3 2. HISTORIC RUIN IN THE SCOPE OF THE CONSERVATION THEORY ........................................................................... 5 2.1 Permanent ruin as a form of securing a historic ruin .................................................................... 5 2.2 "Historic ruin" vs. "contemporary ruin" ............................................................................................ 6 2.3 Limitations characterizing historic ruins ....................................................................................... 10 2.4 Terminology of the conservation activities on damaged objects ............................................... 12 3. RESEARCH ON HISTORIC RUINS ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1. Stocktaking measurements ............................................................................................................. 14 3.1.1. Traditional measuring techniques .............................................................................................. 17 3.1.2. Geodetic method ............................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.3. Traditional, spherical, and photography
    [Show full text]
  • The Connection
    The Connection ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2011: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2011 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 978-0-,010120-2-1 Printed by 3indrush 4roup 3indrush House Avenue Two Station 5ane 3itney O72. 273 1 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 8arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 8ichael Beetham 4CB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air 8arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-8arshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman 4roup Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary 4roup Captain K J Dearman 8embership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol A8RAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA 8embers Air Commodore 4 R Pitchfork 8BE BA FRAes 3ing Commander C Cummings *J S Cox Esq BA 8A *AV8 P Dye OBE BSc(Eng) CEng AC4I 8RAeS *4roup Captain A J Byford 8A 8A RAF *3ing Commander C Hunter 88DS RAF Editor A Publications 3ing Commander C 4 Jefford 8BE BA 8anager *Ex Officio 2 CONTENTS THE BE4INNIN4 B THE 3HITE FA8I5C by Sir 4eorge 10 3hite BEFORE AND DURIN4 THE FIRST 3OR5D 3AR by Prof 1D Duncan 4reenman THE BRISTO5 F5CIN4 SCHOO5S by Bill 8organ 2, BRISTO5ES
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Post-World War II Expulsions of Germans in German Museums
    Eckersley S. Walking the tightrope between memory and diplomacy? Addressing the post-World War II Expulsions of Germans in German Museums. In: Whitehead C; Lloyd K; Eckersley S; Mason R, ed. Museums, Migration and Identity in Europe. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2015, pp.101-122 Copyright: This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Museums, Migration and Identity in Europe on 28th April 2015, available online: https://www.routledge.com/products/isbn/9781472425188 Date deposited: 03/11/2017 Embargo release date: 28 October 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Susannah Eckersley Walking the tightrope between memory and diplomacy? Addressing the post-World War II Expulsions of Germans in German Museums. Introduction “When people use museums, they bring their life experiences with them. Often, their encounter with objects in the museum brings back vivid recollections, half- remembered places and emotions which would otherwise have remained forgotten. It is commonplace for such memories to be discussed amongst the social or family group taking part in the visit. From the exhibits encountered, and the memories evoked and shared, new meanings are made.” (Black 2011:418) The post-World War II expulsions (Vertreibungen) of the German populations from East of the Oder-Neisse line is a difficult and at times controversial topic, marred by both political and emotional issues. This chapter examines museums in Germany which (to a greater or lesser extent) address the histories, places and memories of the expulsions, including the Silesian Museum in Görlitz, the Military History Museum Dresden and the German Historical Museum in Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Silesian Identity in the Period of Nation-States (1918-1945); Tożsamość
    Bernard Linek State Science Institute - Silesian Institute Silesian identity in the period of nation-states (1918-1945) Abstract: When addressing relations between the nation-state and the region, as well as national and re- gional identities, three categories of identities can be identified in the topoi: the land of the Bohemian Crown, Silesian regionalism and the Pan-Silesian approach. Within each nation-state there were some self-identified ‘true’ identities. These national identities attempted to subdue and engulf the regional identities which stemmed from modern Silesian patriotism, creating borderland identities. They took their final form at the turn of the 20th century and during its first decades. Three aspects are subjected to a detailed analysis: the concept of Silesia’s territory and Silesia’s ‘own’ borders, elements of ‘true’ Silesian identity, and the approach to outsiders. Thus, each ‘National Silesia’ had its own borders, different while overlapping. Their denizens could choose from many identities, similar in every ‘National Silesia’ in only the genetic and struc- tural sense, since their essence was the exclusion of those foreign in the national sense. In the second part, these offers are elaborated in three areas: regional and national symbolism (basing on the naming structure adopted in Czechoslovakian Silesia), places of distinct identity in lead- ing cultural institutions (The Upper Silesian National Museum in Bytom) and the implementa- tion of Silesian regionalism within the Polish educational system. Keywords: gesamtschlesischer Raum, land of the Bohemian Crown, Silesian regionalism, magazines Introductory comments. The objective and the subject matter of the study The division of Silesia, as a result of the Silesian Wars in the 18th century, among two supra-national monarchies had manifold political, social and cultural ramifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Gunner Training
    Aerial Gunner Training As captivating as are the combat stories of America’s World War II aerial gunners, so too is the wartime history of the training program that produced them. Some of the earliest training methods devised in 1941 were crude and laughable, and hardly effectual. But ongoing efforts to improve the program led to the development of ingenious ideas, complex Future gunners review the inner workings of theories, hi-tech innovations, and fascinating the Browning .30 caliber machine gun. failures. The U.S. Army Air Force’s plans for a flexible gunnery training program were progressing at a leisurely pace during the latter months of 1941. Construction of three gunnery schools was nearing completion and the first instructor class had graduated. But overnight, the declarations of war against Germany and Japan created an urgent need for large scale training. There were enormous obstacles to meeting such a demand. Training men for the unique physical Students are being timed as they strip and and mental demands of being an aerial gunner then reassemble .50 caliber machine guns blindfolded. was very complex. America had no experience to draw on, and only a handful of newly trained instructors were available. There were not enough planes, equipment and ordnance to fight the war, let alone enough to supply the schools. Nevertheless the first Air Force flexible gunnery classes were in session just days after Pearl Harbor. Las Vegas Army Airfield, the first of the new flexible gunnery schools began accepting its first students in December 1941. Two more Students are trained in disassembling and reassembling their machine guns schools at Harlingen Airfield, Texas, and blindfolded.
    [Show full text]