DOCSLIB.ORG

Macedonian by Victor Friedman © SEELRC 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macedonian by Victor Friedman © SEELRC 2001 Macedonian by Victor Friedman © SEELRC 2001 LW/M 117 1 MACEDONIAN Contents Abbreviations................................................................................................................................... 3 0 Sociolinguistic and Geolinguistic Situation ...................................................................... 4 0.1 Geography........................................................................................................................ 4 0.2 Terminology and History ................................................................................................. 4 0.3 Standardization................................................................................................................. 5 0.4 Status................................................................................................................................ 6 0.5 Dialects............................................................................................................................. 6 0.5.1 Major Isoglosses.............................................................................................................. 6 0.5.2 Vocalic Inventories ........................................................................................................... 6 0.5.3 Prosody............................................................................................................................ 7 0.5.4 Morphology ..................................................................................................................... 7 0.6 Number of Speakers.........................................................................................................8 1 Phonology........................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Orthography..................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Phonemic Inventory and Phonotactics............................................................................ 10 1.2.1 Vowels............................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.2 Consonants..................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Prosody.......................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Lexical Exceptions.......................................................................................................... 13 1.3.2 Phrasal Exceptions ......................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Morphophonemic Alternations....................................................................................... 14 1.4.1 Velar with Palatal............................................................................................................ 14 1.4.2 Velar with Dental............................................................................................................ 14 1.4.3 Dental or Velar with Palatal ............................................................................................ 14 1.4.4 Cluster Simplification..................................................................................................... 14 1.4.5 Dissimilation with -c#e..................................................................................................... 15 1.4.6 Progressive Voicing Assimilation................................................................................... 15 1.4.7 Isolated Consonantal Alternations .................................................................................. 15 1.4.8 Vowel~Zero Alernations................................................................................................. 15 1.4.9 Vocalic Alternations........................................................................................................ 16 2 Morphology ...................................................................................................................17 2.1 Nouns............................................................................................................................. 17 2.1.1 Gender............................................................................................................................ 17 2.1.2 Number .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.3 Definiteness.................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.4 Case................................................................................................................................ 22 2.1.5 Noun Derivation............................................................................................................. 23 2.2 Adjectives ....................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.1 Gender/Number.............................................................................................................. 26 2.2.2 Definiteness.................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 Gradation........................................................................................................................ 27 2.2.4 Adjective Derivation........................................................................................................ 27 LW/M 117 2 MACEDONIAN 2.3 Pronouns.........................................................................................................................29 2.3.1 Personal ..........................................................................................................................29 2.3.2 Possessive.......................................................................................................................29 2.3.3 Deictic.............................................................................................................................29 2.3.4 Interrogative ....................................................................................................................29 2.3.5 Totalizing ........................................................................................................................30 2.4 Numerals.........................................................................................................................31 2.4.1 Cardinal (non-virile)........................................................................................................31 2.4.2 Virile ...............................................................................................................................31 2.4.3 Definiteness ....................................................................................................................31 2.4.4 Ordinals ..........................................................................................................................32 2.5 Verbs...............................................................................................................................33 2.5.1 Inflection.........................................................................................................................33 2.5.2 Verbal Categories............................................................................................................39 2.5.3 Verb Derivation...............................................................................................................45 2.6 Adverbs...........................................................................................................................47 2.7 Prepositions ....................................................................................................................48 3 Syntax.............................................................................................................................49 3.1 Element Order in Declarative Sentences..........................................................................50 3.2 Nondeclarative Sentence Types.......................................................................................54 3.3 Copular and Existential Sentences...................................................................................56 3.4 Coordination and Comitativity.........................................................................................57 3.5 Subordination..................................................................................................................58 3.6 Negation..........................................................................................................................61 3.7 Anaphora and Pronouns..................................................................................................63 3.8 Reflexives and Reciprocals..............................................................................................64 3.9 Possession ......................................................................................................................68 3.10 Quantification..................................................................................................................68 Texts ........................................................................................................................................70
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Assessment Report: Skopje, North Macedonia
    Highlights of the draft Assessment report for Skopje, North Macedonia General highlights about the informal/illegal constructions in North Macedonia The Republic of North Macedonia belongs to the European continent, located at the heart of the Balkan Peninsula. It has approx. 2.1 million inhabitants and are of 25.713 km2. Skopje is the capital city, with 506,926 inhabitants (according to 2002 count). The country consists of 80 local self-government units (municipalities) and the city of Skopje as special form of local self-government unit. The City of Skopje consists of 10 municipalities, as follows: 1. Municipality of Aerodrom, 2. Municipality of Butel, 3. Municipality of Gazi Baba, 4. Municipality of Gorche Petrov, 5. Municipality of Karpos, 6. Municipality of Kisela Voda, 7. Municipality of Saraj, 8. Municipality of Centar, 9. Municipality of Chair and 10. Municipality of Shuto Orizari. During the transition period, the Republic of North Macedonia faced challenges in different sectors. The urban development is one of the sectors that was directly affected from the informal/illegally constructed buildings. According to statistical data, in 2019 there was a registration of 886 illegally built objects. Most of these objects (98.4 %) are built on private land. Considering the challenge for the urban development of the country, in 2011 the Government proposed, and the Parliament adopted a Law on the treatment of unlawful constructions. This Law introduced a legalization process. Institutions in charge for implementation of the legalization procedure are the municipalities in the City of Skopje (depending on the territory where the object is constructed) and the Ministry of Transport and Communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Bulgarian and Slovak Multext-East Morphology Tagset1
    Comparing Bulgarian and Slovak Multext-East morphology tagset1 Ludmila Dimitrovaa), Radovan Garabíkb), Daniela Majchrákováb) a) Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria [email protected] b) Ľ. Štúr Institute of Linguistics, Slovak Academy of Sciences 813 64 Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected], http://korpus.juls.savba.sk Abstract We analyse the differences between the Bulgarian and Slovak languages Multext-East morphology specifica- tion (MTE, 2004). The differences can be caused either by inherent language dissimilarities, different ways of analysing morphology categories or just by different use of MTE design guideline. We describe all the parts of speech in detail with emphasis on analysing the tagset differences. Keywords: Bulgarian, Slovak, grammatical category, morphology specification, morphology tagset Introduction The EC project MULTEXT Multilingual Tools and Corpora produced linguistics resources and a freely available set of tools that are extensible, coherent and language-independent, for seven Western European languages: English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Dutch, and Swedish (Ide, Veronis, 1994). The EC INCO-Copernicus project MULTEXT-East Multilingual Text Tools and Corpora for Central and Eastern European Languages is a continuation of the MULTEXT project. MULTEXT-East (MTE for short; Dimitrova et al., 1998) used methodologies and results of MULTEXT. MTE developed significant language resources for six Central and Eastern European (CEE) languages: Bulgarian,
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Macedonian Literature in English Translation
    A Survey of Macedonian Literature in English Translation “If I had an eagle’s wings I would rise and fly on them To see our shores, to our own parts…” From Konstantin Miladinov’s, “Longing for the South” Macedonian may arguably be the oldest written Slavic language as the basis for Kiril and Methodius' 9th century translations of Christian liturgical texts into what we today call the Old Church Slavic language. However, it is also the most recent Slavic language to receive official recognition and standardization after the establishment of the Republic of Macedonia as part of Yugoslavia in 1946. The number of literary works by Macedonian authors in English translation today is only surpassed by translations in Serbian and/or Croatian during the existence of the former Yugoslavia. Particularly since the full independence of the Republic since the breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990's, the pace of publication of English language translations has increased dramatically. This is due in part to the large concentrations of Macedonian immigrants, numbering in the tens of thousands, in major cities throughout English-speaking Canada, the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom, and a dramatic increase in communication and collaboration among members of the Macedonian diaspora and Macedonians in the home country with improved means of travel and the effective spread of internet communication worldwide. I have participated in this process as the author of a doctoral dissertation published by the University Press of America in 1996, The 19th Century Macedonian Awakening, the life and works of Kiril Peichinovich, one of the earliest writers in the modern Macedonian language, and as the translator of a number of literary works, beginning with the short story "Tatko" by Zhivko Chingo, published in Short Story International in 1983 and most recently the novel The Legend of Kalesh Andja by Stale Popov, published by the Literary Association "Grigor Prlichev" of Sydney, Australia in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 109. Formation of the Standard Language: Macedonian
    1470 XVIII. Slavische Standardsprachen 109. Formation of the Standard Language: Macedonian 1. The Beginnings of Local Schreibsprachen 2. Attempts at Codifying a Literary Language on a Dialectal Basis 3. Formation of a Macedonian Standard Language as Part of “Nation-Building” 4. Recent Developments since Independence in 1991 5. Codification and Use of Macedonian in the Diaspora 6. Literature (selected) Abstract In the 19 th century a number of churchmen in Macedonia wrote sermons and primers in a form of Slavonic that was close to vernacular speech. These can be seen as the first texts of written Macedonian, although their authors did not intend to create a new literary language. The first document of explicit Macedonian linguistic and political separatism is Rečnik od tri jezika (1875). In his book Za makedonckite raboti Krste P. Misirkov (1874Ϫ1926) advocated a literary language based on the Prilep-Bitola dialect, but the book was never distributed. After the partition of Macedonia (1913) Macedonian literary activity was tolerated in Bulgaria and Yugoslavia as “dialect literature”. There were thriv- ing theatre groups in Skopje and Sofia and Kočo Racin from Veles wrote poetry that has retained its literary value. The communist partisans used the local dialects in their pamphlets in Vardar Macedonia during the Axis occupation and in 1944 they declared that Macedonian would be the official language of the new Macedonian republic. The decisive codificational steps were Koneski’s grammar (1952Ϫ1954) and the ‘academy dictionary’ (1961Ϫ1966). Independence has terminated the Serbian/Macedonian diglos- sia that was characteristic of Vardar Macedonia in the 20 th century. There have been various attempts to codify Macedonian in the diaspora.
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Enterprises of Albanians in Macedonia Marginalized in the Economy of the Country?
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 4 No 1 S2 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy April 2015 Are the Enterprises of Albanians in Macedonia Marginalized in the Economy of the Country? Prof. Dr. Nasir Selimi Lecturer of Iliria College Doi:10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n1s2p191 Abstract The number of enterprises with Albanian owners, which are registered and function in Macedonia is not high, on the contrary it is far from structural national participation of the country. This unfavorable situation becomes even clearer if we also consider the size of enterprises owned by Albanians of this country. In fact Albanian entrepreneurs are owners of small and medium enterprises while the numbers of big enterprises that function in Macedonia are not owned by them. This is even more present in enterprises which have as a main activity the reproduction of minerals, minerals extraction, in pharmaceutics, communication services, banking and security services. Beside this fact, Albanians which live and work in Macedonia orientate their business activity mainly on retail trade, offering hotelier services, on small production, and especially on small businesses. Without a doubt one of the main reasons for this is the privatization of social enterprises, which was done in Macedonia during the transition period. Albanians were marginalized from this process and they remain excluded on the portioning process of the social capital, which were an integral part of that country. Keywords: Enterprises, Transition, Privatization, Export, Trading Balance. 1. Macedonia's Economy Marks Growth, but not Economic Development Macedonia's economy in 2014 recorded economic growth of 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Mirativity and the Bulgarian Evidential System Elena Karagjosova Freie Universität Berlin
    Chapter 6 Mirativity and the Bulgarian evidential system Elena Karagjosova Freie Universität Berlin This paper provides an account of the Bulgarian admirative construction andits place within the Bulgarian evidential system based on (i) new observations on the morphological, temporal, and evidential properties of the admirative, (ii) a criti- cal reexamination of existing approaches to the Bulgarian evidential system, and (iii) insights from a similar mirative construction in Spanish. I argue in particular that admirative sentences are assertions based on evidence of some sort (reporta- tive, inferential, or direct) which are contrasted against the set of beliefs held by the speaker up to the point of receiving the evidence; the speaker’s past beliefs entail a proposition that clashes with the assertion, triggering belief revision and resulting in a sense of surprise. I suggest an analysis of the admirative in terms of a mirative operator that captures the evidential, temporal, aspectual, and modal properties of the construction in a compositional fashion. The analysis suggests that although mirativity and evidentiality can be seen as separate semantic cate- gories, the Bulgarian admirative represents a cross-linguistically relevant case of a mirative extension of evidential verbal forms. Keywords: mirativity, evidentiality, fake past 1 Introduction The Bulgarian evidential system is an ongoing topic of discussion both withre- spect to its interpretation and its morphological buildup. In this paper, I focus on the currently poorly understood admirative construction. The analysis I present is based on largely unacknowledged observations and data involving the mor- phological structure, the syntactic environment, and the evidential meaning of the admirative. Elena Karagjosova.
    [Show full text]
  • Knjižica Sažetaka
    Knjižica sažetaka Slavofraz 2018. “Frazeologija, učenje i poučavanje” 19. – 21. travnja Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci 0 Slavofraz 2018. Organizacijski odbor Željka Macan (Rijeka), predsjednica ([email protected]) Sandra Jukić (Rijeka) Mihaela Matešić (Rijeka) Kristian Novak (Rijeka) Marija Turk (Rijeka) Sanja Zubčić (Rijeka) Programski odbor: Marija Turk (Rijeka), predsjednica ([email protected]) Branka Barčot (Zagreb) Dejan Durić (Rijeka) Željka Fink (Zagreb) Mateja Jemec Tomazin (Ljubljana) Vida Jesenšek (Maribor) Erika Kržišnik (Ljubljana) Željka Macan (Rijeka) Valerij Mokienko (Sankt-Peterburg) Heinrich Pfandl (Graz) Katerina Veljanovska (Skoplje) Ivana Vidović Bolt (Zagreb) Karol Visinko (Rijeka) Irena Vodopija Krstanović (Rijeka) Sanja Zubčić (Rijeka) Tajnica Skupa: Sandra Jukić ([email protected]) Idejno i grafičko rješenje: Luka Medak Konferenciju su podržali: Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci, Odsjek za kroatistiku, Riječka kroatistička škola, Turistička zajednica grada Rijeke, „Šta da?“ Kazalo Melita Aleksa Varga, Hrisztalina Hrisztova-Gotthardt Towards a Croatian Paremiological Minimum / Optimum: A Work in Progress 1 Marinela Aleksovski Kako se pretvoriti u uho? 2 Branka Barčot, Tanja Milčić Arijadnina nit u ovladavanju frazemima na nastavi jezika 3 Agnieszka Będkowska-Kopczyk Phraseological units containing the lexical false friend frajer in Slavic languages: a lexico-semantic analysis with a pedagogical application 4 Jasminka Delova-Siljanova Фраземите во наставата: македонско-чешки паралели 5 Wolfgang Eismann Construction
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Defense Division
    Order Code RS21855 Updated October 16, 2007 Greece Update Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Defense Division Summary The conservative New Democracy party won reelection in September 2007. Kostas Karamanlis, its leader, remained prime minister and pledged to continue free-market economic reforms to enhance growth and create jobs. The government’s foreign policy focuses on the European Union (EU), relations with Turkey, reunifying Cyprus, resolving a dispute with Macedonia over its name, other Balkan issues, and relations with the United States. Greece has assisted with the war on terrorism, but is not a member of the coalition in Iraq. This report will be updated if developments warrant. See also CRS Report RL33497, Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations and Related Issues, by Carol Migdalovitz. Government and Politics Prime Minister Kostas Karamanlis called for early parliamentary elections to be held on September 16, 2007, instead of in March 2008 as otherwise scheduled, believing that his government’s economic record would ensure easy reelection. In August, however, Greece experienced severe and widespread wildfires, resulting in 76 deaths and 270,000 hectares burned. The government attempted to deflect attention from what was widely viewed as its ineffective performance in combating the fires by blaming the catastrophe on terrorists, without proof, and by providing generous compensation for victims. This crisis came on top of a scandal over the state pension fund’s purchase of government bonds at inflated prices. Under these circumstances, Karamanlis’s New Democracy party’s (ND) ability to win of a slim majority of 152 seats in the unicameral 300-seat parliament and four more years in office was viewed as a victory.
    [Show full text]
  • English and INTRODACTION
    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction, Phonological, Morphological, Syntactic to The
    AN INTRODUCTION, PHONOLOGICAL, MORPHOLOGICAL, SYNTACTIC, TO THE GOTHIC OF ULFILAS. BY T. LE MARCHANT DOUSE. LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 1886, PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, BED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. PREFACE. THIS book was originally designed to accompany an edition of Ulfilas for which I was collecting materials some eight or nine years ago, but which various con- siderations led me to lay aside. As, however, it had long seemed to me equally strange and deplorable that not a single work adapted to aid a student in acquiring a knowledge of Gothic was to be found in the English book-market, I pro- ceeded to give most of the time at my disposal to the " building up of this Introduction," on a somewhat larger scale than was at first intended, in the hope of being able to promote the study of a dialect which, apart from its native force and beauty, has special claims on the attention of more than one important class of students. By the student of linguistic science, indeed, these claims are at once admitted ; for the Gothic is one of the pillars on which rests the comparative grammar of the older both Indo-European languages in general, and also, pre-eminently, of the Teutonic cluster of dialects in particular. a But good knowledge of Gothic is scarcely less valuable to the student of the English language, at rate, of the Ancient or any English Anglo-Saxon ; upon the phonology of which, and indeed the whole grammar, the Gothic sheds a flood of light that is not to be got from any other source.
    [Show full text]