Sawmill Survey 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sawmill Survey 2000 SAWMILL SURVEY 2000 Report on the survey of sawmill consumption and production in Great Britain in 2000. Prepared by Economics & Statistics Unit of the Forestry Commission in association with the Forestry Commission Advisory Panel (FCAP) Sub-Committee on Supply and Demand. Vani Balachandran and Alister Henderson, Economic & Statistics Unit, Forestry Commission. September 2001 A National Statistics publication Official statistics bearing the National Statistics logo are produced to high professional standards set out in the National Statistics Code of Practice. They undergo regular quality assurance reviews to ensure that they meet customer needs. They are produced free from political interference. You can also find National Statistics on the internet – go to www.statistics.gov.uk This report was prepared by the HQ Economics & Statistics Unit of the Forestry Commission. Any enquiries should be addressed to: Alister Henderson Economics & Statistics Unit Forestry Commission 231 Corstorphine Road Edinburgh EH12 7AT United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)131 314 6337 Fax: +44 (0) 131 316 4344 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 GB Sawmills – Annual Survey 2000 4 Table 1 Consumption and production 1994-2000 4 Table 2 Number of sawmills 2000 5 Table 3 Softwood consumption 2000 6 Table 4 Softwood production 2000 6 Table 5 Summary softwood statistics 1980-2000 7 Table 6 Hardwood consumption 2000 8 Table 7 Hardwood production 2000 8 Table 8 Summary hardwood statistics 1980-2000 9 GB Sawmills – Detailed Survey 2000 (Mills with over 5000m3 production) 10 Table 9 Flow of softwood logs between countries 11 Table 10 Softwood – breakdown by size category 12 Table 11 Softwood – breakdown by country 13 Table 12 Hardwood 15 Table 13 Additional facilities of mills 16 Table 14 Sawmill employment 17 Table 15 Sawmill employment – breakdown by country 17 Appendix 1 – Survey methodology 18 Appendix 2 – Survey questionnaires 20 1 2 GB SAWMILL SURVEY 2000 INTRODUCTION This report gives results from the Sawmill Survey for 2000. This survey is designed to find out about mills that carry out primary processing of British logs. In the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC), this is part of heading 201: sawmilling and planing of wood, impregnation of wood. The survey excludes mills that only saw imported timber, and those that only saw roughsawn timber or small roundwood, which are also in SIC 2001. Statistics on the sawing of small roundwood for producing round fencing material are collected by a separate survey, reported in British Timber Statistics, which also contains statistics on other processing industries using small roundwood. The Forestry Commission does not collect statistics on secondary processing or on the processing of imported wood. The survey of sawmills in Great Britain is carried out by the Economics & Statistics Unit of the Forestry Commission, in association with the Forestry Commission Advisory Panel Sub-Committee on Supply and Demand (SSD). We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of all sawmills that completed the survey questionnaire, of the UK Forest Products Association and the members of SSD who provided advice. The report consists of two sections; the first reports results from the annual survey, the second results from the detailed survey of the largest mills which is now carried out every second year. Figures in the tables are individually rounded, so the constituent items may not add to the totals given. 3 GB SAWMILLS – ANNUAL SURVEY 2000 This section gives results for timber consumption and sawnwood production from the Sawmill Survey for 2000. Survey Responses In the 2000 Survey 374 questionnaires were sent out. Following a reminder and a telephone call to the largest non-respondents, 193 responses were received, a response rate of 52%. The latest estimates for consumption and production in the last seven years, including estimates for non- respondents, are shown in Table 1 expressed in thousand cubic metres underbark for consumption, and thousand cubic metres sawnwood for production. While the 2000 sawmill survey was being carried out, Forest Enterprise offices around Britain were asked to provide information on mills in their area, who had not responded to the annual sawmill survey since 1998 or earlier. Estimates for 1994-1999 have been revised to include information supplied during this exercise. Revisions were also made to historical data for sawmills that reported data for the first time in 2000, and also to take account of mill closures before 2000 which were only notified to us during the 2000 survey. Table 1: Consumption and production 1994 - 2000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Softwood: consumption 000 m3 ub 3,366 3,329 3,425 3,490 3,570 3,859 3,936 production 000 m3 1,923 1,899 1,917 1,980 1,995 2,147 2,159 Hardwood: consumption 000 m3 ub 316 330 258 259 227 205 183 production 000 m3 180 190 151 143 126 119 107 Imported Round Timber Of the mills covered by the survey (those that saw British timber) it is estimated that 16 mills used imported round timber in 2000, totalling 9,200 m3 ub softwood and 7,900 m3 ub hardwood. This is based on responses for 2000 and estimates for non-respondents that had reported using imported round timber in earlier years. 4 Number of sawmills Based on all the 2000 survey responses, together with data from previous years for those who did not respond for 2000, it is estimated that there were 297 sawmills processing British timber in 2000, of which 178 produced at least 1,000 m3 sawnwood. Of those 178 mills, 132 processed softwood only, 11 hardwood only, and 35 both hardwood and softwood. Of the 119 smaller mills, 48 processed softwood only, 17 hardwood only, and 54 both hardwood and softwood. Table 2: Number of sawmills 1994 - 2000 Size Category 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 (production) Great Britain 483 440 393 367 339 314 297 <1,000m3 252 215 187 170 144 136 119 1,000 - 4,999m3 144 139 122 116 116 98 100 5,000 - 24,999m3 66 66 62 58 57 56 53 25,000 - 49,999m3 14 15 15 15 11 10 12 50,000m3+ 7 5 7 8 11 14 13 Scotland 121 110 98 97 93 84 85 <1,000m3 57 47 42 43 36 30 29 1,000 - 4,999m3 29 29 24 22 25 24 27 5,000 - 24,999m3 26 25 22 22 22 20 18 25,000 - 49,999m3 5776424 50,000m3+ 4234687 England 324 293 260 238 215 200 185 <1,000m3 176 151 128 113 95 93 81 1,000 - 4,999m3 107 100 90 86 82 66 67 5,000 - 24,999m3 34 36 34 31 30 32 28 25,000 - 49,999m3 5466555 50,000m3+ 2222344 Wales 38 37 35 32 31 30 27 <1,000m3 19 17 17 14 13 13 9 1,000 - 4,999m3 81088986 5,000 - 24,999m3 6565547 25,000 - 49,999m3 4423233 50,000m3+ 1122222 5 British Softwood Consumption of British softwood (in thousand cubic metres underbark) and production (in thousand cubic metres sawnwood) are shown in the following tables, including estimates for non respondents. Total softwood consumption was 3.94 million m3 underbark and sawn softwood production was 2.16 million m3 sawnwood. While consumption rose by around 2% from 1999 , production rose by only around 0.5%. Apparent recovery (calculated as the ratio of sawnwood production to underbark log consumption) was 55%. Table 3: Softwood consumption - 2000 000 m3 underbark Sawmill size category (000 m3 total production: hard + soft) <1 1 - <5 5 - <25 25 - <50 50+ Total GB Total 53 353 800 762 1,969 3,936 Scotland 16 130 379 251 951 1,728 England 36 192 325 318 639 1,510 Wales 1 31 96 192 378 698 Table 4: Softwood production - 2000 000 m3 sawnwood Sawmill size category (000 m3 total production: hard + soft) <1 1 - <5 5 - <25 25 - <50 50+ Total GB Total 31 211 447 405 1,065 2,159 Scotland 10 76 206 141 520 953 England 21 116 185 161 354 836 Wales 0 19 56 103 191 369 Summary Table 5 (on the next page) gives a summary of production and consumption, for softwood for the years 1994 to 2000. 6 Table 5 - Summary softwood statistics: 1994 - 2000 Log consumption Sawnwood production Apparent recovery Year (000 m3 ub) (000 m3 sawn) (%) Great Britain 1994 3,366 1,923 57 1995 3,329 1,899 57 1996 3,425 1,917 56 1997 3,490 1,980 57 1998 3,570 1,995 56 1999 3,859 2,147 56 2000 3,936 2,159 55 Scotland 1994 1,440 814 57 1995 1,394 784 56 1996 1,444 799 55 1997 1,478 823 56 1998 1,504 834 55 1999 1,614 894 55 2000 1,728 953 55 England 1994 1,426 828 58 1995 1,381 810 59 1996 1,399 803 57 1997 1,407 823 58 1998 1,458 835 57 1999 1,564 892 57 2000 1,510 836 55 Wales 1994 499 281 56 1995 554 304 55 1996 581 316 54 1997 605 333 55 1998 608 326 54 1999 681 361 53 2000 698 369 53 7 British Hardwood Consumption of British hardwood (in thousand cubic metres underbark) and production (in thousand cubic metres sawnwood) are shown in the following tables, again including estimates for non respondents. Results for the larger categories are combined, to avoid disclosure of individual returns. Total hardwood consumption was 183 thousand m3 underbark and total sawn hardwood production was 107 thousand m3 sawnwood, both down around 10% on 1999. Apparent recovery is 59%, slightly up on 1999.
Recommended publications
  • Whose- U&XD0(4 Rr ? S. Pei^ Usow
    whose- U&XD 0(4 rr ? ¿ 5 S. p e i^ usow OST of us have invented a country, oerhaps a philosoph­ ically constructed "Republic" or "Utopia", perhaps just a fictional world of our own. The country we invent will reflect our thoughts, just as the 'Lord or the Rings' and 'The Silmarillion' reveal Tolkien's ideas and ideals. Inventing a country - or what is equivalent - writing a fantasy or science-fiction story, creates certain problems. In writing a fantasy story we need to invent a certain amount. A few 'alien' versions of everyday necessities - such as currency or weights and measures - are sufficient to tell the reader that the story is not an everyday one; but invent too many words or new ideas and we risk pushing our story too far away from our audience for them to treat it as anything more than 'just' fiction. In this article I wish to look at one aspect of the fantasy world (or secondary world, if you prefer): the metrology, and its role in the 'Lord of the Rings' in particular. Why metrology? Perhaps for no better reason than that metrication is upon us. For better or for worse our world is being changed, like it or not; it is not simply another necessary change; it creates a barrier between the past and the future. Fantasy writers sometimes mention metrology; Burroughs., on Barsoom, provided footnotes on the measure used on Mars, on the time-units, and also on the measures on Venus. Not all writers go to this extreme; some mention time-units to make the point that a non-decimal system is being used, others may say nothing at all, taking it for granted that the metric system is in uni­ versal use.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Units
    Imperial units From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the post-1824 measures used in the British Empire and countries in the British sphere of influence. For the units used in England before 1824, see English units. For the system of weight, see Avoirdupois. For United States customary units, see Customary units . Imperial units or the imperial system is a system of units, first defined in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824, later refined (until 1959) and reduced. The system came into official use across the British Empire. By the late 20th century most nations of the former empire had officially adopted the metric system as their main system of measurement. The former Weights and Measures office in Seven Sisters, London. Contents [hide] • 1 Relation to other systems • 2 Units ○ 2.1 Length ○ 2.2 Area ○ 2.3 Volume 2.3.1 British apothecaries ' volume measures ○ 2.4 Mass • 3 Current use of imperial units ○ 3.1 United Kingdom ○ 3.2 Canada ○ 3.3 Australia ○ 3.4 Republic of Ireland ○ 3.5 Other countries • 4 See also • 5 References • 6 External links [edit] Relation to other systems The imperial system is one of many systems of English or foot-pound-second units, so named because of the base units of length, mass and time. Although most of the units are defined in more than one system, some subsidiary units were used to a much greater extent, or for different purposes, in one area rather than the other. The distinctions between these systems are often not drawn precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards and Units: a View from the President of the Royal Society of New South Wales
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 150, part 2, 2017, pp. 143–151. ISSN 0035-9173/17/020143-09 Standards and units: a view from the President of the Royal Society of New South Wales D. Brynn Hibbert The Royal Society of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, and The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Email: [email protected] Abstract As the Royal Society of New South Wales continues to grow in numbers and influence, the retiring president reflects on the achievements of the Society in the 21st century and describes the impending changes in the International System of Units. Scientific debates that have far reaching social effects should be the province of an Enlightenment society such as the RSNSW. Introduction solved by science alone. Our own Society t may be a long bow, but the changes in embraces “science literature philosophy and Ithe definitions of units used across the art” and we see with increasing clarity that world that have been decades in the making, our business often spans all these fields. As might have resonances in the resurgence in we shall learn the choice of units with which the fortunes of the RSNSW in the 21st cen- to measure our world is driven by science, tury. First, we have a system of units tracing philosophy, history and a large measure of back to the nineteenth century that starts social acceptability, not to mention the occa- with little traction in the world but eventu- sional forearm of a Pharaoh. ally becomes the bedrock of science, trade, Measurement health, indeed any measurement-based activ- ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Units of Measure
    Imperial Units of Measure So far we have looked at metric units of measure, but you may have spotted that these are not the only units of measurement that we use. For example, you might buy your milk in pints, or measure a journey in miles. These are some examples of imperial units of measure, which we need to be familiar with. What is the imperial system? Do not panic! You will not be expected to remember the measurements needed to convert between metric and Take a look at this video to start your imperial units. You will always be given the numbers you investigation. need to convert. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/z4nsgk7/ articles/zwbndxs See if you can find these units of measure being used anywhere around your house. You will spot this symbol being used when looking at imperial and metric measures. This symbol means ‘approximately’ or ‘approximately equal to’. It is hard to be exact when using two different systems of measurement and we often use rounding to make the calculations easier. Using Imperial Units of Measure Let’s start by looking at length I’m going to use a bar model to help me solve these conversions. If I know that 1 inch is approximately 2.5 centimetres, I think I’m going to need to be counting up in 2.5 10 cm 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 I have used the conversion given to me, to work out that 4inches is approximately 10cm. I know that 16 is 4 lots of 4 (4x4) So, I need to know what 4 lots of 10 is (4x10) 16 inches is approximately 40cm 15inches is 1 inch less than 16.
    [Show full text]
  • International and National Standards on Dimensional Coordination, Modular Coordination, Tolerances and Joints
    A111D3 7 3 2 M fl breau of Standards Bldg. |AT'L INST E-01 Admin. OF STANDARDS & TECH R.I.C. CT I 1981 A1 11 03073248 n , rna,lonal and natlona 00™ ?!i?,^U57 N0.5J J? 131092 95, 1980 C.1 NBS-PUB-C 19 NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 595 foo U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards X X INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL STANDARDS ON DIMENSIONAL COORDINATION, MODULAR COORDINATION, TOLERANCES AND JOINTS IN BUILDING NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress on March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau's technical work is per- formed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory, and the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology. THE NATIONAL MEASUREMENT LABORATORY provides the national system of physical and chemical and materials measurement; coordinates the system with measurement systems of other nations and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical and chemical measurement throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce; conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measurement, standards, and data on the properties of materials needed by industry, commerce, educational institutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other Government agencies; develops, produces, and distributes Standard Reference Materials; and provides calibration services.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Metric and Imperial Linear Conversions
    Metric and Imperial Linear Conversions Estimating Metric and Imperial Linear Conversions People estimate distance, time, height and other measurements in everyday life. Estimates are often made using familiar measurements. For example, to measure distance, people may know that 1 step is approximately 1 metre or 1 yard. Using the stride estimate, sizes of rooms, yards and fields can be estimated by walking around them. People often estimate heights of other people based on their own heights. Conversions between metric and imperial units can be estimated using the following guidelines: 1 inch is approximately 3 centimetres 1 yard is approximately 1 metre 1 foot is approximately 0.3 metre 1 mile is approximately 1.5 km. Examples A) A 6-inch pen is approximately 6 × 3 cm = 18 cm. B) A 5-foot sign is approximately 5 × 0.3 = 1.5 metres. C) A distance of 10 yards is approximately 10 metres. D) 60 miles/h is approximately 100 km/h. Calculating Metric and Imperial Linear Conversions It is useful to know how to convert between units in the metric and imperial systems for many reasons, such as when travelling to the United States or following directions to construct something manufactured in the U.S.A. Also, many Canadians refer to height in feet and inches. Imperial measurement is often used in sports, e.g., the yardage in football, lines on a basketball court, 1 mile horse 4 race. Knowledge and Employability Studio Shape and Space: Measurement: Mathematics Linear Measurement: ©Alberta Education, Alberta, Canada (www.LearnAlberta.ca) Metric and Imperial Linear Conversions 1/4 Common conversions between the metric and imperial systems of linear measurement are shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Modular/F.R.L. Units Series AC
    P0295-P0364-E.qxd 08.11.6 2:05 PM Page 295 Modular/F.R.L. Units Series AC AC AF AR AL AW AG Round type pressure gauge (with color zone) AV AF800 AF900 295 P0295-P0364-E.qxd 08.11.6 2:05 PM Page 296 Modular F.R.L. Units Series AC Improved visibility for Improved installation lubricant drip Bracket with spacer with graduation for lubricant control Retainer Graduation 5 6 4 7 3 C M 8 S 2 9 1 Spacer with bracket Lever pin q Attach the component into the fitting of the spacer with bracket. w Lock the lever pin into the retainer. (temporary installation) Embedded Bolt pressure gauge is a standard feature. Ozone resistant rubber material (HNBR) Improved relief sensitivity Float type auto drain with excellent operability is used for compact models (AF10/20). Drain cock is easy-to-use rotary type. e Tighten the bolt. Round type pressure gauge (with color zone) type ˾ Red and green zones offer improved visibility of pressure control range. Green indicator Indicator adjusts to highlight preferred range Red indicator b Filter Regulator AW20(K) to 60(K) b Mist Separator Regulator AWM20 to 40 b Micro Mist Separator Regulator AWD20 to 40 b F.R.L. Unit b Regulator AC20 to 60 (AF + AR + AL) AR20(K) to 60(K) AC20A to 60A (AW + AL) AC20B to 60B (AF + AR) AC20C to 40C (AF + AFM + AR) AC20D to 40D (AW + AFM) 296 P0295-P0364-E.qxd 08.11.6 2:05 PM Page 297 Series Configuration Port size Product Model Page M5 x 0.8 1/8 1/4 3/8 1/2 3/4 1 Air Filter + Regulator + Lubricator AC10 AF AR AL AC20 AC25 AC30 AC40 300 AC40-06 AC50 AC55 AC60 Filter Regulator + Lubricator
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Note 10: Dimensioning and Estimating Brick Masonry
    TECHNICAL NOTES on Brick Construction 10 1850 Centennial Park Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191 | www.gobrick.com | 703-620-0010 February 2009 Dimensioning and Estimating Brick Masonry Abstract: This Technical Note presents information for determining the basic layout of brick masonry walls, including both structural and veneer applications. Modular and non-modular brick masonry is discussed, including overall dimensioning of masonry walls using various brick unit sizes. Finally, guidelines are presented to aid the designer in estimating the amount of materials needed for brick masonry. Key Words: actual dimension, construction, estimating, modular masonry, nominal dimension, size, specified dimension. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: Brick and Mortar Joint Sizes: brick lengths, use nominal dimensions as intended • Specify brick using standardized nomenclature and constructed dimensions specified size (width by height by length) • When nominal dimensions are used on plans but are • For modular brick, specify mortar joint thicknesses such not intended to be used for construction, note plans that when added to the specified brick size, the intended accordingly modular dimensions result • When possible, select brick size to minimize cutting Estimating: • Use wall area method and tables to determine number Bond Pattern: of brick and quantity of mortar per wall area • Select one-half running bond for applications when brick • Modify brick estimates for bond pattern, breakage and width is one-half of brick length; select one-third running waste bond
    [Show full text]
  • Or Rather, Kilometres – Away from a Uniform System of Measurement
    For Immediate Release Canadian Public Opinion Poll Page 1 of 9 Canada is miles – or rather, kilometres – away from a uniform system of measurement Young people use metric the most, but nearly everyone thinks of their height and weight in imperial. March 1, 2017 – How tall is Sidney Canada has officially been a metric-using Crosby? And how far is it from country since the 1970s, but lots of people Vancouver to Halifax? For most Canadians, the answers to these still use the imperial system of measurement questions are “5 feet, 11 inches,” and for different things. Overall, what do you “6,160 km,” respectively. think about this? Contained within these answers is a distinctly Canadian contradiction: 17% Although this country officially went metric in the 1970s, there are many day-to-day measurements for which 16% Canadians have not forgotten their 67% imperial roots. A new public opinion poll from the Angus Reid Institute finds this is It's okay for Canadians to keep using a mix of both systems especially true of older Canadians, who were schooled in a system of pounds Canada should go back to the imperial system and gallons instead of kilograms and Canada should work harder to use the official metric system litres. Conversely, younger (under 25) METHODOLOGY: Canadians' stated unfamiliarity with the imperial system suggests the shift The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from January 9 - 12 among a representative randomized sample of 1,501 towards the metric system will continue Canadian adults who are members of the Angus Reid Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Sg4-Units-Of-Measurement.Pdf
    Units of Measurement: A. The Imperial System Canada uses the metric system – most of the time! However, there are still places and occasions where the imperial system of measurement is used. People often talk about their height in feet and inches or their weight in pounds. Many recipes measure in cups and teaspoons. Another example is the term ‘two by four’ when talking about lumber. That term means that a plank is roughly two inches thick and four inches wide. Another place where the imperial system of measurement is often seen is in the grocery store, especially in the meat/fish and fresh produce sections. Prices and weights are often given in both metric and imperial units of measurement. For example, you may see a sign advertising “Potatoes – 89¢ a pound (lb.) or $1.96 per kilogram (kg)”. The USA uses only a system of measurement related to the imperial one, so items imported from there often do not have a metric equivalent given. Cookbooks frequently use one or the other system of measurement. For all these reasons, it is important to understand both systems and be able to convert one into the other. The most common imperial units of measurement are: Quantity Unit Symbol length foot ft. weight pound lb. volume gallon gal. Here are the most common conversions of imperial units of measurement: Length Weight Volume 1 foot (ft. ) = 12 inches (in.) 1 pound (lb.) = 16 ounces (oz.) 1 pint (pt.) = 2 cups 1 yard (yd.) = 3 feet 1 ton = 2000 pounds (lbs.) 1 quart (qt.) = 2 pints 1 mile (mi.) = 5280 feet or 1760 yards 1 gallon (gal.) = 4 quarts When we convert units in the imperial system, we use a familiar rule: When we convert a larger unit to a smaller unit, we multiply by the conversion factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B. Units and Systems of Measurement Their Origin, Development, and Present Status
    Handbook 44 – 2016 Appendix B – Units and Systems of Measurement Table of Contents Appendix B. Units and Systems of Measurement Their Origin, Development, and Present Status ...................................................................................................B-3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. B-3 2. Units and Systems of Measurement ............................................................................................................ B-3 2.1. Origin and Early History of Units and Standards. .............................................................................. B-3 2.1.1. General Survey of Early History of Measurement Systems. ................................................ B-3 2.1.2. Origin and Development of Some Common Customary Units. ........................................... B-4 2.2. The Metric System. ............................................................................................................................. B-5 2.2.1. Definition, Origin, and Development. .................................................................................. B-5 2.2.2. International System of Units. .............................................................................................. B-6 2.2.3. Units and Standards of the Metric System. .......................................................................... B-6 2.2.4. International Bureau of Weights and Measures. ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instructional Materials; *Metric System; *National Programs; Teacher Education; Vocational Education
    LAAA&V.&WWWM OVeTTMW ED 055 890 SE 012 591 TITLE U.S. Metric Study Interim Report- Education. INSTITUTION National Bureau of Standards (D0C), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NBS-SP-345 6 PUB DATE Jul 71 NOTE 210p.; aLxth in a series of interim reports prepared for the Congress of the United States AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Catalog No. C 13.10:345-6 $1.75) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$9.67 DESCRIPTORS Curriculum Developmen ; Educational Attitudes; Educational Change; Educational Strategies; Instructional Materials; *Metric System; *National Programs; Teacher Education; Vocational Education ABSTRACT This report-is another in the .series being .prepared on the numerous investigations comprising the U. S. Metric Study, by the U. S. National Bureau of Standards. This report concerns tho effects of increasing worldwide use of the metric system on-education in the United States. Its purpose is to present the.educational; -advantages and disadvantages of both-the metric and the customary systems. of units; to determine the current usage.of metric, measurements in schools, and trends in that usage; to find the ways in:which education would have to .change as the-U. S. accommodates to increased worldwide use of the-metric system, under a planned national progra or withoutsuch a program; and to eStimate the costs . of the changes; and to make -recommendations for:ways_ in which to take best-Advantage .of the changes. It is concluded thatithe..advantages of going.metric. in education are significant:but notoverwhelming. On the'other hand, the costs are not prohibitive and cam -be .met largely- out of normal expenditures.,A conversion-period of 10 years seems to bea Close- to the optimum, bat national leadership andsense of purpose -would .be.-needed to completely benefit from metric conversion.
    [Show full text]