DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia from Private TV Network to Public Media Holding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia from Private TV Network to Public Media Holding CTC Media, Inc. Investor Presentation First Quarter 2013 Results A Leading Independent Broadcaster in Russia From Private TV Network to Public Media Holding Launch of CTC-international in Germany and the Baltics Telcrest Investments Limited acquired a 25% stake in СTС Media from Alfa Group Establishment of Story First CTC Media was content production founded as Story Modern Times Group Initial Public Offering company First Communications became a shareholder on NASDAQ Launch of CTC- of CTC Media international in Launch of Domashniy.ru USA women’s portal 1989 1994 2002 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Launch of CTC- international in Launch of CTC Launch of Acquisition of DTV Israel Launch of CTC- Network Domashny Network (rebranded to Peretz international in in 2011) Establishment of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, CTC Media’s Armenia, Georgia, Acquisition of internal advertising Azerbaijan, Thailand and Channel 31 in sales house uplink to HOT BIRD Kazakhstan and ‘Everest Sales’ launch of CTC Mega CTC and Domashny channel in Moldova Launch of received digital licenses Videomore.ru online content portal 2 We Fully Capture the Value Chain by Being a Vertically Integrated TV Broadcaster CTC – target audience All 10-45 Domashny – target audience Females 25-59 FREE-TO-AIR ( RUSSIA) Peretz – target audience All 25-49 Kazakhstan Channel 31 FREE-TO-AIR (CIS) Moldova СTС Mega CONTENT PRODUCTION Free-to-air Story First Production TV ad maket growth1 AD SALES Internal advertising sales house Everest International version of CTC channel CTC-INTERNATIONAL (PAY-TV) Various digital projects DIGITAL MEDIA Online video portal Videomore.ru Women’s portal Domashniy.ru 3 We Operate in Attractive Markets Russia Kazakhstan Population = 142 million Population = 16.3 million Armenia, Georgia, 2012 TV Ad Market = US$ 4.5 billion* 2012 TV Ad Market = US$ 135.5 million* Azerbaijan Russian-speaking population = 12.3 million Russian-speaking population=10.4 mln Kyrgyzstan Russian-speaking population = 2.5 million Thailand USA Russian-speaking tourists = 1.3 million (2012) Russian-speaking population = 3.5 million Israel Russian-speaking Germany population = 1.5 million Russian-speaking population = 6 million Moldova Since February 2012 Population = 3.6 million CTC-International 2012 TV Ad Market = US$ 16.7 million* is available on the HOT BIRDTM 8 satellite (W/E Europe, North Africa, Middle East and Central Asia Baltic states coverage) Russian-speaking population = 4 million Sources: Video International, Russian Association of Communications Agencies, ZenithOptimedia, CIA World Factbook, Rosstat, Russkiy Mir Foundation 4 Note: (*) All TV Ad Markets figures are net of VAT We Are the Largest Independent FTA-Broadcaster in Russia with Premium Audiences Combined audience shares, % (all 10-45 demographic) Maintained 2nd place 23.6 21.7 17.5 15.3 13.1 12.9 12.6 12.1 9.5 8.4 5.7 4.9 4.7 4.1 Q1 2012 Q1 2013 Gazprom-Media СTС Media VGTRK (Rossiya) Channel One National Media Group Prof-Media UTV Russia Holding Source: TNS Russia 5 Growth Company Operating in a Dynamic Market 6 Digitalization in Russia Is on Its Way First multiplex Second multiplex Third multiplex * Terms of tender to be announced in 2013 + 1public TV channel (to be launched in May 2013) + 1 vacant slot Available in 7 regions To be fully rolled-out (98% all-Russia penetration) by 2016 *Expected payment for digital transition in 2013 is 107.8 mln RUB (approximately $3 mln net of VAT) per channel . Fees payable to RTRS for 2014 and beyond will st be calculated on an annual basis according to rates that RTRS will set by October 1 of the prior year and will be impacted by the multiplex infrastructure roll-out. 7 Russian Ad Market Has Significant Potential for Further Development… Russian TV ad market was #9 in the world Free-to-air TV ad market growth1 and #5 in Europe in 20121… 62.1 298 22.2 257 263 219 15.3 186 bln 12.8 140 129 5.7 117 US $ 5.2 RUB bln RUB 109 4.7 4.6 4.5 96 95 42 2004 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 TV Ad Market Total Ad Market …and is expected to become # 5 in the world 1 2 66.3 and #1 in Europe in 2014 Russian TV ad market forecast 22.4 18.2 275 15.2 5.9 5.9 5.3 bln 5.1 190 4.8 bln US $ 140 RUB 2012 2015F 2020F Note: All TV Ad Markets figures are net of VAT 8 Sources: (1) Zenith Optimedia, Company’s estimates (2) Video International …Due to Relatively Low Ad Spend as % of GDP and Underleveraged Consumer Ad spend as % of GDP¹ Retail and mortgage loans as % of GDP2 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 33% 0.9 0.9 1.0 18% 0.9 30% 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 18% 25% 20% 17% 13% 12% 6% 3% 3% UK USA Turkey Russia Russia Poland Austria Poland Ukraine Belgium Bulgaria Hungary Slovenia Germany Czech RepCzech Kazakhstan CEEAverage 2008 2012 Retail loans, % of GDP Mortgage loans, % of GDP Sources: (1) ZenithOptimedia, Company’s estimates (2) Eurostat, National Central Banks, 2012 9 TV Is the Most Attractive Advertising Medium in Russia FY 2011 cost per thousand in Russia (US$)² TV is the only medium with truly national reach TV 1.8 Important social and cultural platform More free-to-air networks than in other countries Radio 2.9 High quality free-to-air content offering Internet 4.9 Newspapers 5.4 Magazines 6.0 1 Ad spend in Russia by media segment (%) H1 2011 TV cost per thousand (US$)² 48% 46% 43% Russia 2.1 31% Asia 8.0 Western Europe 9.0 19% 18% 14% 13% Eastern Europe 11.0 6% 4% 1% 0.4% 2% North America 17.0 TV Internet Press Outdoor Radio Other 2004 2012 2020F Sources: (1) Russian Association of Communication Agencies, Video International (2) Initiative Media 10 Internet Consumption Is Growing… 2012: Russia is #1 in Europe by number of Internet users Increase of time spend online (hours per day) 68.0 67.5 3.1 2.9 2.7 52.7 52.2 2.4 2.3 2.1 36.5 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.5 Russia Germany UK France Turkey China Russia Brazil India USA Japan Internet users, mln 2009 2015E 2012: Internet Ad market growth in Russia (RUB, bln) 2012: Internet penetration by country 56 84% 83% 78% 42 27 48% 48% 40% 18 15 11 11% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 UK Germany US Turkey Russia China India Sources: ComScore, Boston Consulting Group, Zenith Optimedia, AKAR, Mindshare Interaction, ITU 11 …but Not at the Expense of TV Usage TV Usage (Minutes per day, All 16+) 249 246 243 243 228 232 226 222 210 169 188 153 TV 142 133 134 170 Radio Internet Other 58 48 51 47 45 46 44 37 42 13 39 40 Minutes per day 5 5 6 23 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: TNS Gallup Media, Russia 12 We Continue to Deliver Strong Top and Bottom-line Growth… 280 256 805 247 45% 766 250 730 41% 220 221 680 39% 38% 211 38% 41% 200 37% 574 174 532 35% 32% 32% 32% 150 427 104 273 100 25% 71 26% 26% 27% 181 50 22% 21% 16% 21% 20% 16% US $ mln US $ US $ mln US $ 0 15% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010 2011** 2012** 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010 2011** 2012** (Comparable-basis) total operating revenues*** OIBDA* OIBDA margin*, % Peers average OIBDA margin****,% Notes: (*) OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization (exclusive of amortization of programming and sublicensing rights. OIBDA margin is defined as OIBDA divided by total operating revenues. Both OIBDA and OIBDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures (see reconciliations on page 44) (**) 2008 OIBDA and OIBDA margin are adjusted to exclude a $232.7 million charge arising from the impairment of the intangible assets of DTV Group in Russia, Channel 31 in Kazakhstan and a broadcasting group in Moldova; 2009 OIBDA and OIBDA margin are adjusted to exclude an $18.7 million charge arising from the impairment of the broadcasting licenses in Russia and a $28.6 million stock-based compensation expense recognized in conjunction with the previously announced settlement by CTC Media of litigation brought by it against its former CEO; 2011 OIBDA and OIBDA margin are adjusted to exclude a $106.4 million charge arising from the impairment of several regional broadcasting licenses and the Peretz Network goodwill; 2011 OIBDA and OIBDA margin are adjusted to $82.5 million non-recurring charge arising from the impairment of analog broadcasting licenses (see reconciliations on page 42-43) (***) Comparable-basis operating revenues are non-GAAP financial measures provided in order to facilitate period-to-period comparisons of CTC Media’s results following the implementation of the new model of advertising sales starting from 2011 (see reconciliations on page 44) (****) Following companies are included in European peers average OIBDA margin calculations: CME, TVN, S.A. Modern Times Group, Antena3, ITV plc, Metropole Television, Mediaset, ProSiebenSat, Mediaset Espana, TF1 13 …and to Diversify Our Lines of Business 69% 15% 11% 2004 Q1 2013 Sublicensing 2% Channel 31 2% Digital Media 0.5% CTC- International 0.5% Russian FTA Russian FTA Broadcasting Broadcasting 100% 95% 14 Strategic Focus on Long-Term Growth and Diversification 15 We Have Clear Strategic Priorities • Build library DISTRIBUTION PLATFORMS: • Enhance existing platforms • Stabilize audience • Develop in-house share production Improve audience • profile • Invest in ideas development female portal • Increase production comedy portal Grow audience volumes • and market shares • Develop distribution • Create strong brands collaboration (VK, Youtube) CIS • Be available on all screens Grow audience • and market shares DIVERSIFICATION: CONTENT • iVas on existing platforms • Games Up to 20% Expand to markets • • Transmedia branded with Russian- entertainment content speaking audiences CONTENT DIGITAL MEDIA DIGITAL of CTC Media channels’ programming grid (from ~10% in 2012) BROADCASTING Content is king….
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organisational Structure, Programme Production and Audience
    OBSERVATOIRE EUROPÉEN DE L'AUDIOVISUEL EUROPEAN AUDIOVISUAL OBSERVATORY EUROPÄISCHE AUDIOVISUELLE INFORMATIONSSTELLE http://www.obs.coe.int TELEVISION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE, PROGRAMME PRODUCTION AND AUDIENCE March 2006 This report was prepared by Internews Russia for the European Audiovisual Observatory based on sources current as of December 2005. Authors: Anna Kachkaeva Ilya Kiriya Grigory Libergal Edited by Manana Aslamazyan and Gillian McCormack Media Law Consultant: Andrei Richter The analyses expressed in this report are the authors’ own opinions and cannot in any way be considered as representing the point of view of the European Audiovisual Observatory, its members and the Council of Europe. CONTENT INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................6 1. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK........................................................................................................13 1.1. LEGISLATION ....................................................................................................................................13 1.1.1. Key Media Legislation and Its Problems .......................................................................... 13 1.1.2. Advertising ....................................................................................................................... 22 1.1.3. Copyright and Related Rights .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Stop a Douchebag) Vigilantes in Russia
    © Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research. 2019. 11(3):16–45 16 DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2019-11-3-16-45 EROES OR HOOLIGANS? HMEDIA PORTRAYAL OF STOPXAM (STOP A DOUCHEBAG) VIGILANTES IN RUSSIA Rashid Gabdulhakov Rashid Gabdulhakov, Department of Media and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Address for correspondence: Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands. [email protected]. The author expresses sincere gratitude to the informants for their contributions, as well as to peer reviewers and editors of this special issue for their valuable feed- back. This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) project num- ber 276-45-004. Several state-supported digital vigilante groups emerged in Russia at the downturn of the pro-Kremlin youth group Nashi (Ours), when its former commissars formed issue- specific movements to counter perceived legal and moral offences through exposure of targets on social media. One of such groups is StopXam (Stop a Douchebag), specializ- ing in road-traffic and parking violations. StopXam participants confront the drivers and retaliate by placing stickers that read “I spit on everyone I drive where I want” on the targets’ windshields. The retaliation is often accompanied by verbal and physical fighting; the process is filmed, edited, and shared on YouTube, receiving millions of views. While digital media made such practices possible, traditional broadcasters maintain significance in rendering meaning to the phenomenon of vigilantism and in framing vigilantes, their targets, police, and other actors. As the existing literature on digital vigilantism is predominantly focused on digital media affordances, this article aims to address this gap through a qualitative analysis of traditional media coverage of StopXam.
    [Show full text]
  • Censorship Among Russian Media Personalities and Reporters in the 2010S Elisabeth Schimpfossl the University of Liverpool Ilya Yablokov the University of Manchester
    COERCION OR CONFORMISM? CENSORSHIP AND SELF- CENSORSHIP AMONG RUSSIAN MEDIA PERSONALITIES AND REPORTERS IN THE 2010S ELISABETH SCHIMPFOSSL THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL ILYA YABLOKOV THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Abstract: This article examines questions of censorship, self-censorship and conformism on Russia’s federal television networks during Putin’s third presidential term. It challenges the idea that the political views and images broadcast by federal television are imposed coercively upon reporters, presenters and anchors. Based on an analysis of interviews with famous media personalities as well as rank-and-file reporters, this article argues that media governance in contemporary Russia does not need to resort to coercive methods, or the exertion of self-censorship among its staff, to support government views. Quite the contrary: reporters enjoy relatively large leeway to develop their creativity, which is crucial for state-aligned television networks to keep audience ratings up. Those pundits, anchors and reporters who are involved in the direct promotion of Kremlin positions usually have consciously and deliberately chosen to do so. The more famous they are, the more they partake in the production of political discourses. Elisabeth Schimpfossl, Ph.D., teaches history at The University of Liverpool, 12 Abercromby Square, Liverpool, L69 7WZ, UK, email: [email protected]; Ilya Yablokov is a Ph.D. candidate in Russian and East European Studies, School of Arts, Languages and Cultures, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester,
    [Show full text]
  • CTC Media Investor Presentation
    CTC Media, Inc. Investor Presentation May 2014 A Leading Independent Broadcasting and Content Company in Russia From Private TV Network to Public Media Holding Launch of CTC- international in Germany, North America and the Baltics Development of in- house creative Telcrest Investments production center Limited acquired a 25% CTC Media was stake in СTС Media Launch of Peretz from Alfa Group founded as Story International in Modern Times Group First Initial Public Offering Belarus became a shareholder Launch of Domashniy.ru Communications on NASDAQ Launch of CTC- of CTC Media international in women’s portal USA 1989 1994 2002 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Launch of CTC Launch of CTC- Love Channel on international in cable and satellite Launch of CTC Launch of Israel Acquisition of DTV Launch of CTC- Network Domashny Network Launch of Peretz (rebranded to Peretz international in Establishment of International in in 2011) Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, CTC Media’s Kyrgystan Armenia, Georgia, internal advertising Acquisition of Azerbaijan, Thailand and sales house Launch of Sweet Channel 31 in uplink to HOT BIRD ‘Everest Sales’ me brand together Kazakhstan and a TV with KupiVip company in Moldova CTC and Domashny Launch of received digital licenses Videomore.ru online content portal 2 We Fully Capture the Value Chain by Being Integrated TV Broadcaster CTC – target audience All 10-45 BROADCASTING ( RUSSIA) Domashny – target audience Females 25-59 Peretz – target audience All 25-49 CTC Love – target audience All 11-34 Kazakhstan Channel
    [Show full text]
  • Alfa Annual Report
    ALFA GROUP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORT OF THE AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2001 STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF ALFA GROUP . International convention requires that Management prepare consolidated financial statements which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of Alfa Group (“the Group”) at the end of each financial period and of the results, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for each period. Management are responsible for ensuring that the Group keeps accounting records which disclose, with reasonable accuracy, the financial position of each entity and which enable it to ensure that the consoli- dated financial statements comply with International Accounting Standards and that their statutory accounting reports comply with the applicable country’s laws and regulations. Furthermore, appropriate adjustments were made to such statutory accounts to present the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Accounting Standards. Management also have a general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably possible to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. Management considers that, in preparing the consolidated financial statements set out on pages to , the Group has used appropriate and consistently applied accounting policies, which are supported by reasonable and prudent judgments and estimates and that appropriate International Accounting Standards have been followed. For and on behalf of Management Nigel J. Robinson October ZAO PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit Kosmodamianskaya Nab. 52, Bld. 5 115054 Moscow Russia Telephone +7 (095) 967 6000 Facsimile +7 (095) 967 6001 REPORT OF THE AUDITORS TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF ALFA GROUP .
    [Show full text]
  • Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05
    CO VERIN G CO N FLICT Reporting on Conflicts in the N orth Caucasus in the Russian M edia N M AY 2008 ARTICLE 19, 6-8 Am w ell Street, London EC1R 1U Q , U nited Kingdom Tel +44 20 7278 9292 · Fax +44 20 7278 7660 · info@ article19.org · http://w w w .article19.org ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05 i ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION Covering Conflict Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media May 2008 © ARTICLE 19 ISBN 978-1-906586-01-0 Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05 i i ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05 ii i ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION A CKN O W LED G EM EN TS This report was researched and written by the Europe Programme of ARTICLE 19. Chapter 6, on ‘International Standards of Freedom of Expression and Conflict Reporting’ was written by Toby Mendel, Director of ARTICLE 19’s Law Programme. Chapter 5, ‘Reporting Conflict: Media Monitoring Results’ was compiled by Natalia Mirimanova, independent conflict resolution and media consultant. The analysis of media monitoring data was carried out by Natalia Mirimanova and Luitgard Hammerer, (formerly) ARTICLE 19 Regional Representative - Europe, CIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Downside up Charitable Fund
    Annual Report Downside Up Charitable Fund July 2016 - June 2017 Annual Report Downside Up Charitabledownside Fund, 2016 - 2017 up1 Dear Friends! downside up On September 15th, 2017, Downside Up Charitable Fund turned 20! In this annual report, we have not only collected the results from the last academic year, but also recalled important achievements of the Fund over the past 20 years. During this time, we have come a long way. We Thanks to a highly professional team, the Fund started as a small organization that helped a stands firmly on its feet and continues to few dozen families, to the Fund as it is now. A improve family support programmes. fund that supports thousands of people with Down syndrome in Russia and beyond. In early I want to thank everyone who is involved in the years when we started working people with Fund's activities - employees, colleagues, donors Down syndrome were rarely seen in society. and our partners! I want to express my sincere Parents were afraid to go out with their child admiration to our children with Down and there was an acute shortage of information syndrome and their loved ones! Thanks to our about where they could find help. Now every common efforts in Russia, there have been Let people with Down family can get information, support and many positive changes in the lives of people participate in Downside Up programmes. Not with Down syndrome and the environment in syndrome dream about the only can they choose services and classes for which they live. As I blow out the 20 candles on future and let their dreams their child in Downside Up but also in other our birthday cake, I want to make a wish with organisations that have become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency and Disclosure by Russian State-Owned Enterprises
    Transparency And Disclosure By Russian State-Owned Enterprises Standard & Poor’s Governance Services Prepared for the Roundtable on Corporate Governance organized by the OECD in Moscow on June 3, 2005 Julia Kochetygova Nick Popivshchy Oleg Shvyrkov Vladimir Todres Christine Liadskaya June 2005 Transparency & Disclosure by Russian State-Owned Enterprises Transparency and Disclosure by Russian State-Owned Enterprises Executive Summary This survey of transparency and disclosure (T&D) by Russian state-owned companies by Standard & Poor’s Governance Services was prepared at the request of the OECD Roundtable on Corporate Governance. According to the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of SOEs, “the state should act as an informed and active owner and establish a clear and consistent ownership policy, ensuring that the governance of state-owned enterprises is carried out in a transparent and accountable manner” (Chapter III). Further, “large or listed SOEs should disclose financial and non financial information according to international best practices” (Chapter V). In stark contrast with these principles, the study revealed consistent differences in disclosure standards between the state-controlled and similarly sized public Russian companies. This is in line with the notion that transparency of state-controlled enterprises is hampered by the tendency of the Russian government and individual officials to use their influence on such companies to promote political or individual goals that often diverge from commercial motives and investor interests. High standards of transparency and disclosure, on the other hand, are a cornerstone in the foundation of good governance. They provide legitimate stakeholders--whether creditors, minority shareholders, taxpayers, or the general public--with the information they need to be able to begin to hold government decision-makers accountable for their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Media in Teleological Perspective As a Methodological Challenge: Reconstructing Goals for Understanding Effects
    RUSSIAN MEDIA IN TELEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE AS A METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGE: RECONSTRUCTING GOALS FOR UNDERSTANDING EFFECTS РОССИЙСКИЕ СМИ В ТЕЛЕОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ ПЕРСПЕКТИВЕ КАК МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ВЫЗОВ: РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ЦЕЛЕЙ ДЛЯ ПОНИМАНИЯ ЭФФЕКТОВ Viktor M. Khroul, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Chair of Sociology of Mass Communications, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia [email protected] Виктор Михайлович Хруль, кандидат филологических наук, доцент, кафедра социологии массовых коммуникаций, факультет журналистики, Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия [email protected] The media effects studies are more precise in a teleological perspective implying that the effects are analyzed in terms of goals. The teleological approach to journalism must be based on an analysis of the transparency and regularity of the goal formation process, the level of consistency and hierarchicality of goals and their compliance with the social mission of the media. The author considers it useful to engage in an interdisciplinary cooperation in the area of teleological studies of journalism and mass media with sociologists, linguists and psychologists. 191 Key words: journalism, goals, teleological model, social mission, intent analysis. Изучение эффектов деятельности СМИ корректно про- водить с учетом поставленных целей, то есть в телеологи- ческой перспективе. Телеологический подход к журналисти- ке подразумевает анализ степени прозрачности и систем- ности процесса целеполагания, уровня согласованности и иерархичности целей, а также их соответствие социальной миссии СМИ. Автор полагает, что плодотворность тако- го подхода во многом зависит от состояния междисципли- нарного сотрудничества в области исследований эффектов СМИ, взаимодействия исследователей медиа с социолога- ми, лингвистами и психологами, в частности, при развитии метода интент-анализа. Ключевые слова: журналистика, цели, телеологический подход, социальная миссия, интент-анализ.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T
    RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T. Allison, Director Editor: Ben Dunlap Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project Production Director: Melissa C..Carr John F. Kennedy School of Government Researcher: Emily Van Buskirk Harvard University Production Assistant: Emily Goodhue SPOTLIGHT ON RUSSIA’S OLIGARCHS On July 28 Russian President Vladimir Putin met with 21 of Russia’s most influ- ential businessmen to “redefine the relationship between the state and big busi- ness.” At that meeting, Putin assured the tycoons that privatization results would remained unchallenged, but stopped far short of offering a general amnesty for crimes committed in that process. He opened the meeting by saying: “I only want to draw your attention straightaway to the fact that you have yourselves formed this very state, to a large extent through political and quasi-political structures under your control.” Putin assured the oligarchs that recent investi- The Kremlin roundtable comes at a crucial time for the oligarchs. In the last gations were not part of a policy of attacking big business, but said he would not try to restrict two months, many of them have found themselves subjects of investigations prosecutors who launch such cases. by the General Prosecutor’s Office, Tax Police, and Federal Security Serv- ice. After years of cozying up to the government, buying up the state’s most valuable resources in noncompetitive bidding, receiving state-guaranteed loans with little accountability, and flouting the country’s tax laws with imp u- nity, the heads of some of Russia’s leading financial-industrial groups have been thrust under the spotlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment from Russia Stabilizes After the Global Crisis 1
    Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of Russian Academy of Sciences Investment from Russia stabilizes after the global crisis 1 Report dated June 23, 2011 EMBARGO: The contents of this report must not be quoted or summarized in the print, broadcast or electronic media before June 23, 2011, 3:00 p.m. Moscow; 11 a.m. GMT; and 7 a.m. New York. Moscow and New York, June 23, 2011 : The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint undertaking of the Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their second joint survey of Russian outward investors today 2. The survey is part of a long-term study of the rapid global expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging markets. The present survey, conducted at the beginning of 2011, covers the period 2007-2009. Highlights Despite the global crisis of the last few years, Russia has remained one of the leading outward investors in the world. The foreign assets of Russian MNEs have grown rapidly and only China and Mexico are further ahead among emerging markets. As the results of our survey show, several non- financial 3 Russian MNEs are significant actors in the world economy. The foreign assets of the 20 leading non-financial MNEs were about USD 107 billion at the end of 2009 (table 1). Their foreign sales 4 were USD 198 billion and they had more than 200,000 employees abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report Cdsenp 4Ymedia APR 20Fl
    11006198 media _\ t7 2010 Annual Report cdSEnp 4Ymedia APR 20fl Dear CTC Media Stockholders 2054 2010 was record year for CTC Media Our full-yeaTfeVemre-ec4eded the record levels we saw in 2008 before the financial crisis This is particularly noteworthy when you consider that 2008 was record year for the television advertising industry in Russia and that in 2010 the overall market remained 6% below the 2008 levels in ruble terms whereas our full-year 2010 revenues were 14% higher than in 2008 We maintained our national advertising market share at 19% in 2010 despite our significant market outperformance in 2009 and the blended power ratio for our Russian networks remained stable from 2009 to 2010 at 1.5 We operate in highly competitive market where more and more value is placed on the delivery of incremental reach among the most attractive audience groups Our channels have carefully segmented and complementary audience profiles and we are focused on further developing our programming grids and increasing our combined share of viewing In this context it is important to note that CTCs audience share in the most commercially attractive segment of 14 to 44 year olds was stable in 2010 We also substantially enhanced the technical penetration of all of our networks in Russia during 2010 CTCs penetration increased from 90.7% to 93.7% while Domashnys penetration was up from 76.4% to 81.6% and DTVs penetration was up from 68.4% to 72.5% We continued to deliver profitability levels that are high by European broadcasting industry standards with
    [Show full text]