Strategies of Dissociation: A Mimetic Dimension to Social Problems in Japan Matthew Taylor Department of English Faculty of Humanities Kinjo Gakuin University Omori 2-1723 Moriyama-ku Nagoya, Japan
[email protected] Introduction In the course of discussing Freud in his lecture series The Gift of Self, Gil Bailie (1994) points out the mimetic nature of “hysteria”: [T]he hysteric is one who is being influenced by another, who resents and rebels against the influence. And the hysteric has two arch ways of warding off this influence. One is to become autistic, in a sense–an emotional dissociation. So the hysteric goes blank as a way of trying to ward off the influence. And the other [way] is histrionics, to “act out,” to try to exorcise the other, and to demonstrate that the hysteric is, in fact, the real subject. Hysteria is clearly the self pathologically entangled with another.(1)This seems to me a useful encapsulation of some basic mimetic realities, and one that could be extended to situations that are both more normal and more extreme. If the “hysteric” can be either catatonic or histrionic, the better adjusted person, when faced with mimetic entanglement–that is, interpersonal struggle–can likewise choose simple non-participation or antagonistic engagement. And the more profoundly afflicted can choose extreme social withdrawal or pathological violence. The dissociative response to mimetic entanglement is of particular interest, since it is not usually given much attention in mimetic theory. In fact, Bailie’s brief exposition above is the only instance I can recall it being directly mentioned at all.