sign in sign up
<<
Home , Comedy of remarriage

A b c d e___ f g h__ i j k l m n o p r s__ t u v

Allen Richard. 1995. Projecting Illusion: Film Spectatorship and the Impression of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Altman Rick. 1999. Film/. London: BFI. genurile Anderson Barbara. 1980. “Eye Movement and Cinematic Perception.” Journal of the University Film Association 32. nos. 1 and 2 (1980): 23–26.. cog Anderson Joseph D.. 1993 fall. A Cognitive Approach to continuity. Post-Script. Essays in Film and the Humanities vol.13 (1) p.61-66. eco Anderson Joseph. 1996. The Reality of Illusion: Ecologigal Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. eco Anderson. J. D.. & Anderson. B. F.. 1996. The case for ecological metatheory. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.). Post theory: Reconstructing film studies (pp. 347–367). Madison. WI : University of Wisconsin Press. eco Anderson Joseph D. & Barbara Fisher Anderson (eds.). 2005. Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations. Carbondale. IL: Southern Illinois University Press. eco Anderson Joseph D.. 2013. Toward ecology of the arts. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.76- 93. eco Andre Emmanuelle. 2007. Estetique du motif. Cinéma. musique. peinture. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes. Andrew Dudley. 1976. The Major Film Theories : Introduction. New York : Oxford University Press. Andrew Dudley. 1977. « The Gravity of Sunrise ». Quarterly Review of film studies. vol. 2. no. 3. Andrew Dudley. 1984. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press. th classic Andrew Dudley. 2010. What Cinema is? Bazin’s Quest and its Charge. Wiley-Blackwell. Arnheim Rudolf. 1973. Vers une psychologie de l’art. Paris: Seghers. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1974. Art and visual perception. Los Angeles. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1976. La Pensée visuelle (1969). Flammarion. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1982. The Power of the Center. University of California Press. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1983. Film as Art London:Faber & Faber. (1957. original german 1932) Berkeley and Los Angles: University of Californa Press /. th clasic Aumont Jacques. 1987 [1979]. Montage Eisenstein. Bloomington. IN:Indiana University Press. Aumont Jacques. 1980. L'espace et la matière ». in Théorie du film. Paris. A.J:.atros. th an Aumont J. Bergala A. Marie M. Vernet M.. 1983. L’Esthétique du film. Paris : Nathan. th Aumont Jacques. 1984. Vertov et la vue. in Cinémas et réalités. CIEREC Tra1Q....X XLI. Université de Saint- Étienne. th peint Aumont Jacques. 1984 b. Notes sur un fragment de La Chinoise. de Godard. Sémiologiques. Linguistique et sémiologie. n0 6. Presses Universitaires de Lyon. th peint Aumont Jacques. 1986. « Godard Peintre ». in belge du cinéma – Jean-Luc Godard. Les films. no.16 Aumont J. Marie M.. 1988. L ’Analyse des films. Paris : Nathan. th. an. tx Aumont Jacques. 1992. Du visage au cinema. Paris : Editions de l’Etoile. th Aumont Jacques. 1994. Introduction a la couleur : des discours aux images. Paris : Armand Colin. th Aumont Jacques (ed.). 1995. La couleur en cinema. Mazzotta : Cinematheque francaise. th Aumont Jacques. 1997 [1990]. The Image. London : British Film Institute. Aumont J. Bergala A. Marie M. Vernet M. (3e ed.). 2008. L’Esthétique du film. Paris : Armand Colin. th. Aumont J. Marie M. (2e ed.). 2008 b. L ’Analyse des films. Paris : Armand Colin : coll. cinéma. th. an. tx Aumont Jacques (2e ed.). 2010. Le cinéma et la mise en scène. Paris : Armand Colin coll. cinéma. th an

B Baird Robert. 2000. “The Startle Effect: Implications for Spectator Cognition and Media Theory.” Film Quarterly 53. no. 3 (2000): 12–24 Balazs Bela. 1970. (1945). Theory of the Film: Character and Growth of a New Art. trad. Edith Bone. New York: Dover. th Barratt Daniel. 2014. The Geography of Film Viewing. What are the Implications of Cultural-Cognitive Differences for Cognitive Film Theory?. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 62-82 Baudry Jean-Louis. 1978. L’Effet cinéma. Paris : Albatros. psy Bazin Andre. 1958. Qu’est-ce que le cinema ?. vol.I-IV. Paris : Editions du cerf. (Ce este cinematograful ?. Bucureşti. Editura Meridiane 1968). th clas Bazin Andre. 1967 vol.1 – 1972 vol.2. What is Cinema ?. Berkeley: University of California Press. classic

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 1 Bellour Raymond. 1975. The Unattainable Text. Screen 16 no.3 (autumn 1975): 19-28. Bellour Raymond. 1980. Le Cinéma américain. Analyses de film 2vol.. Paris : Flammarion. an Bellour Raymond. 1980. L’Analyse du film. Paris: Albatros. th. BN 8-v-78166 (18). (The Analysis of Film. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press. 2002) 1 . poststr Bellour Raymond. 1988. Analyse du film. (2002. The Analysis of Film (edited by Constance Penley). Bloomington. IN : Indiana University Press. an Bellour Raymond. 1989. « Le malheur d’énoncer » in Le Mal au cinéma : textes inédits. Dunkerque : Studio 43. th Bellour Raymond. 1990. L’Entre-images : photo; cinéma; video. La Différence. BN 8-v-101488 Bellour Raymond. 1990. Cinéma et peinture. PUF. th BN 16-v-18807 Bellour Raymond. 1995. Le blocage symbolique. L’analyse du film. Bellour Raymond. 2009. Le Corps du cinema. Hypnoses – emotions – animalites. Paris: P.O.L.. coll. Trafic. emo Bellour Raymond. 2010. “Deleuze: The Thinking of the Brain.” Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image 1 (2010): 81–94. http://cjpmi.ifl.pt/1-deleuze/ Ben-Shaul Nitzan. 2007. Film. The Key Concepts. Berg: Oxford-N.Y. Ben-Shaul Nitzan. 2008. Hyper-Narrative Interactive Cinema. Problems and Solutions. Amsterdam-N.Y. : Rodopi Bergala Alain. Initiation a la sémiologie du récit en images. les Cahiers de l’Audiovisuel. Berliner Todd. 2013. Hollywood Storytelling and Aesthetic Pleasure. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.195- 213. cog Bettetini G.. 1979. Tempo del senso. La logica temporale dei testi audiovisivi. Milano : Bompiani. én Bettetini G.. 1984. La conversazione audiovisiva. Problemi dell’enunciazione filmica e televisiva. Bompiani.én Bettetini G.. 1991. La simulatione visiva. Milano : Bompiani. én Beylot Pierre. 2005. Le Recit audiovisuel. Paris:Armand Colin Cinema. nar Blanco D.. 1987. Figures discursives de l’énonciation cinématographique. Actes sémiotiques Documents IX 90. én Blankenship Janell & Tobias Nagl (eds.). 2015. European Visions. Small Cinemas in Transition. Bielefeld : Transcript Verlag. Block Bruce. 2001. The Visual Story: Seeing the Structure of Film. TV. and New Media. Woburn. MA: Focal Press. manual Bondanella Peter. 2002. The Films of Federico Fellini. Cambridge University Press. fell Bonitzer Pascal. 1977. La notion de plan et le sujet au cinéma. Cahiers du Clinéma 273 / 275. th Bonitzer Pascal. 1982 a. Le Champ aveugle. Paris – Cahiers de cinema / Gallimard. psy Bonitzer Pascal. 1992 b. “Hitchcockian Suspense”. in Zizek Slavoj (ed). 1992 Everything you always wanted to know about Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hitchcock. New York: Verso. p.15-31. original in Cahiers du cinema no.8. hors-serie. Bonitzer Pascal. 2000 (1978). „Deframings”. Cahiers du cinema. vol 4. 1973-1978. History. Ideology. Cultural Struggle. ed. David Wilson. Noew York : Routledge. Bordwell David. 1981. The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer. University of California Press. Berkeley. th Bordwell, David. (1985 a). Narration in the Fiction Film. Winsconsin: University of Winsconsin Press. (fisa a5) Bordwell David & Staiger Janet & Thompson Kristin. 1985 b. The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. London : Routledge end Kegan Paul. form Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 1986 (second edition) 1979. Film Art: Introduction. Massachussets: Addison-Wesley. th cog Bordwell David. 1988. Ozu and the Poetics of Cinema. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press. Bordwell. David. 1989. Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bordwell David. 1989b. „A Case for Cognitivism”. in Iris 9 (Spring 1989). pp.11-40. cog Bordwell David. 1990. „A Case for Cognitivism: Further Reflections”. in Iris 11 (Summer 1990). p.107-112. cog Bordwell David. 1993. The Cinema of Eisenstein. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. Bordwell. David & Carroll Noel (eds.). 1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. th

1 See "System of a Fragment" (on THE BIRDS) and "Symbolic Blockage" (on NORTH BY NORTHWEST) in Raymond Bellour: The Analysis '!fFilm (edited by Constance Penley) . Bloomington. IN : Indiana University Press 2002 : 28--68 . 77- 1 9 2 ; Stephen Heath: "Film and System" (two parts). In: Screen . Vol. 1 6 . No. 1 : 7-77 and Vol. 1 6 . No. 2 : 9 1 - 1 1 3 ; editors of Cahiers du Cinema: "John Ford's YOUNG MR. LINCOLN". In: Screen . Vol. 1 3 . No. 5 . autumn 1 972 [orig. French 1 970] . Reprinted in Bill Nichols (ed . ) : Movies and Methods. Vol. 1 . Berkeley. CA: University of California Press 1 976: 493-5 2 9 .

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 2 Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 2003. A Film History. Introduction (2 ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. hist cog Bordwell David. 2005. Figures Traced in Light. On cinematic staging. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bordwel David. 2006. The Way Hollywood Tells It. Story and Style in Modern Movies. University of California Press. nu Bordwell David. 2007. Poetics of Cinema. Routledge. an Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 2008 (eighth edition) 1979. Film Art: Introduction. New York: McGraw Hill. th nu Bordwell David. 2011. blog. http://www.davidbordwell.net/ Bordwell David. 2013. The viewer’s Share: Models of Mind in Explaining Film. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.29-52. cog Borgoyne Robert. 1986. The Interaction of Text and Semantic Deep Structure in the Production of Filmic Characters. Iris. Cinema et Narration. volume 1 Bouvier Michel et Leutrat Jean-Louis. 1981. Nosferatu. Paris. Gallimard. Cahiers du Cinéma. th an Boyd. B.. Carroll. J.. & Gottschall. J. (Eds.). (2010) Evolution. Literature. and Film: A Reader. New York. NY and Chichester. West Sussex: Columbia University Press. eco Branigan Edward. 1984. Point of View in the Cinema. A theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film. The Hague: Mouton Publishers. BN 8-z-41813 (66) Branigan Edward. 1986. “Diegesis and Authorship in Film”. Iris. 7. cog Branigan Edward. 1991. AFI Film Reader.. Branigan, Edward. (1992). Narrative Comprehension and Film. London: Routledge. BU CAEN01 188205 Branigan Edward. 1992. Wide Angle : A Film..cog Branigan Edward. 1993. “On the Analysis of Interpretive Language”. Part I. in Film Criticism. XVII. 2-3. th Branigan Edward. 2006. Projecting a Camera. London: Routledge. aarg org th cog Braudy Leo. 1976. The World in a Frame: What We See in Films. Garden City. NY : Anchor Pres / Doubleday. Braudy Leo & Marshall Cohen. 2004. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (sixth ed). New York: Oxford University Press. Bresson F.. 1983. Compétence iconique et compétence linguistique. Communications 33 - Seuil. th ling Brown William. 2009. Man without a Movie Camera - Movies Without Men. Towards a Posthumanist Cinema?. in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge – Francis & Taylor. nu Browne, Nick. 1975. The Spectator-in-the-Text: The Rhetoric of "Stagecoach". Film Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Winter, 1975-1976), pp. 26-38. Browne Nick. 1975. Rhetorique du texte spectaculaire. in Communications no. 23. Paris : Seuil. na Browne Nick. 1982. The Rhetoric of Filmic Narration. Michigan: UMI Research Press. na Brunick Kaitlin L.2013. James E. Cutting & Jordan E. DeLong. 2013. Low-level Features of Film: What Yhey are and Why We would be Lost Without Them. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.133- 148. vis Brunick Kaitlin L. & James E. Cutting. 2014. Coloring the Animated World. Exploring Human Color Perception and Preference through the Animated Film. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 124-138. cog Buckland Warren (eds.). 1995. The Film Spectator: From Sign to Mind. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. th film cog Buckland Warren. 2000. The Cognitive Semiotics of Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. cog Buckland Warren & Elsaesser Thomas. 2002. Studying Contemporary American Film. A Guide to Movie Analysis. Oxford University Press Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge – Francis & Taylor. Buckland Warren. 2009b. Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema. Malden. MA. Oxford: Blackwell. Burch Noel. 1982. Narrative / Diegesis : Thresholds Limits. Screen 23 n.2 july - august. Burch Noël. 1969 - 1987. Une praxis du cinéma. . an Burch. Noel. 1981. (1969). Theory of Film Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. vis Burch Noel. 2013. The Battle of the Sexes in French Cinema. 1930-1956. Duke University Press Books Burton Charlie2. “Directed by Brainwave.” Wired.co.uk. (accessed November 19. 2011) http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2011/10/%20play/directed-by-brainwave

2 MyndPlay relația joc computer.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 3 Butte, George. 2008. Suture and the Narration of Subjectivity in Film. Poetics Today 29:2 (Summer 2008)

C Carroll John M.. 1980. Toward a Structural Psychology of Cinema. The Hague: Mouton. Carroll Noel. 1988. Mystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia Universtiy Press Carroll Noel. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror. or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York. London: Routledge. Carroll, Noël. (1996). Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge University Press. Carroll Noel. 2003. Engaging the Moving Image. Yale University Press. Carroll Noël (with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). 2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing. Carroll Noël. 2006 b. ‘‘Fiction. Non-Fiction. and the Film of Presumptive Assertion: A Conceptual Analysis.’’(in Film Theory and Philosophy. eds. Richard Allen and Murray Smith (New York: Oxford University Press. 1997): 173–202.Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press (with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). 2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 154-171 Carroll Noel. 2006 c. “Defining the Moving Image”. in Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing Carroll Noel. 2008. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Blackwell Publishing. Carroll Noel. 2010. Art in Three Dimensions. Oxford UP. Carroll, Noel and William P. Seeley. (2013). Cognitivism. Psychology. and Neuroscience: Movies as attentional engines. In Arthur P. Shimamura (ed.). (2013b). Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. 53-75. cog Carroll Noel & William Seeley. 2014. Cognitive Theory and the Individual Film. The Case of Rear Window. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.235-252. cog Casetti Francesco.1990. D’un regard l’autre. Le film et son spectateur. Lyon : Presses Universitaires de Lyon. én Casetti Francesco. 1991. Como analizar un film. . an Casetti Francesco. 1997 [1993]. Theories of Cinema 1945-1995. Austin. Tx: University of Texas Press [Milano. Bompiani]. Casetti Francesco. 2007. ”Theory. Post-Theory. Neo-Theories: Changes in Discourses. Changes in Objects”. in Cinémas : revue d'études cinématographiques / Cinémas: Journal of Film Studies. vol. 17. n° 2-3. 2007. p. 33-45. Casetti Francesco. 2008. Eye of the Century: Film. Experience. Modernity. NY: Columbia University Press Cavell Stanley. 1971. The World Viewed. in Carroll Noël (with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). 2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing. pp.67-78 (extrase din The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. New York: Viking Press. 1971: 16–41. Cavell Stanley. 1981. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood of Remarriage. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. comedia Chateau Dominique. 1983. « Film et réalité : pour rajeunir un vieux problème ». Iris vol.1 no.1 : 51-6. én Chateau Dominique. 1983. « Diégèse et énonciation ». Communications 38 - Seuil. én Château Dominique. 1987. Le cinéma comme langage. Bruxelles : AISS – Publication de la Sorbonne. Château Dominique. 1976. « Projet pour une sémiologie des relations audio-visuelles dans le film ». Musique enjeu. Paris. Le Seuil. no. 23. avril 1976. Château Dominique. 1997. Le bouclier d’Achille : Theorie de l’iconicite. Paris> L’Harmattan. Chatman. S.. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press. nar Chion Michel. 1982. La voix au cinéma. Paris : Cahiers du cinéma. Editions de l’Etoile. th. (The Voice in Cinema. Trans. Claudia Gorbman. New York: Columbia UP. 1999) Chion Michel. 1985. Le Son au Cinéma. Paris. éd. de l'Étoile. th Chion Michel. 1985 b. Ecrire un scénario. Paris : INA.Cahiers du cinéma. th. an. sc Chion Michel . 1991. L’Audiovision. Paris. th. (Chion. Michel. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. Trans. Claudia Gorbman. New York: Columbia UP. 1994. 1990) Chion Michel (ed. Zizek Slavoj). 1992. “The Impossible Embodiment”. Everything you always wanted to know about Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hichcock. (ed.) Slavoj Zizek. New York: Verso. 195 sq. Choi, Jinhee. 2005.“Leaving It Up to the Imagination: POV Shots and Imagining from the Inside.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1): 17–25. Cinema and Cognitive Psychology. Iris 9 spring. cog

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 4 Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge 3 crit Clayton Alex. 2011. Coming to Terms. in The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge. crit Colin Michel. 1985. Langue. film. discours. Prolegomenes a une semiologie generative du film. Paris: Klincksieck. sem. th. cog Colin Michel. 1987. « La sémiologie du cinéma comme science cognitive ». Iconics. The Japan Society of Image Arts and Sciences. Tokyo p.41-63. cog Colin Michel. 1986. « Interprétation sémantique et représentation spatiales dans la bande image ». DRLAV. Revue de linguistique 34-35 p.359-76. cog Colin Michel. 1987. « Les retransmissions sportives à la télévision : pour une approche cognitive ». Communication information 9 n.1. Université Laval p.13-32. cog Colin Michel. 1987. « Comprendre l’événement sportif à la télévision : l’exemple de la course cycliste ». MANA 7. Mannheim p.97-123. cog Colin Michel. 1987. « Pour une conception topologique du point de vue ». in « La Subjectivité au cinéma ». Actes sémiotiques. Bulletin année X 41 p.57-64. cog Colin Michel. 1987. « La Grande syntagmatique revisitée ». EHESS. Séminaire de Ch.Metz. Théorie du Film - miméo - Paris III. cog Colin Michel. 1995. “La Grande syntagmatique revisitée”. The Film Spectator: From Sign to Mind. ed. Warren Buckland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp.45-86. cog Colin Michel. 1992. Cinéma; télévision; cognition..cog BN 8-V-106402 Colman Felicity (ed.). 2009. Film. Theory and Philosophy. The Key Thinkers. McGill-Queens University Press. th Colman Felicity. 2011. Deleuze & Cinema: The Film Concepts.. Oxford: Berg. Copland Aaron. 1949. "Tip to Moviegoers : Take off those Ear-Muffs . " in The New York Times. Nov. 6 . 1949 . section six . p . 28 . This article is discussed at length in Roy M . Prendergast's Film Music: A Neglected Art (New York : Norton . 1977) . Chap . 6. Corballis Paul M.. 2007. Constructing and Interpreting the World in the Cerebral Hemispheres. Hochberg Julian (Mary A.Peterson. Barbara Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Mind’s Eye. Julian Hochberg On the Perception of Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. vis Crafton Donald. 1982. Before Mickey: The Animated Film 1898-1928. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Cubitt Sean. 2004. The Cinema Effect. Cambridge. Massachussets. MIT Cubitt Sean. 2009. The Supernatural in Neo-baroque Hollywood. in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge – Francis & Taylor. nu Currie Gregory. 1995. Image and Mind: Film. Philosophy. and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. philo Currie Gregory. 2004. ”Cognitivism”. in Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing. Currie Gregory. Art and the Anthropologists. in Shimamura Arthurs P. & Stephen E. Palmer (eds.). 2012. Aesthetic Science: Connencting Minds. Brains. and Experience. Oxford UP. pp.107-128. cog Currie Gregory. Matthew Kieran. Aaron Meskin (eds.). 2015. Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. forthcoming Cutting, J.E., J.E. DeLong, and C.E. Nothelfer. 2010. “Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film.” Psychological Science 21(3): 432–439. Cutting James E. & Ayse Candan. 2013. ”Movies. Evolution. and Mind: From Fragmentation to Continuity.” The Evolutionary Review 4. no. 3 (2013): 25–35.

D Danto Arthur C.. 1979. ”Moving Pictures”. Quarterly Review of Film Studies 4 (1) p.17. th (in Noel Carroll. 2006. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing. pp.100 sq) Danto Arthur C.. 1989. La Transfiguration du banal. Seuil. th Dayan Daniel. 1974. „The Tutor-Code of Classical Cinema”. in Movies and Methods. Dayan Daniel. 1983. graffiti. Jeux de langage et programmation du spectateur dans la chevauchée de John Ford. Paris : Clancier-Geunaud. (fisa a5) Dayan Daniel & Katz Elihu. 1985. „Electronic Ceremonies: Television Performs a Royal Wedding”. in Signs. ed. Marshall Blonsky. Baltimore: The John University Press. an

3 Analiza stilului criticii de cinema. Critica stilului critic al lui Bordwell & Thompson.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 5 Deaca Mircea. 2013. Anatomia cognitivă a filmului. Introducere în abordarea semio-cognitivă a discursului audiovizual. Bucuresti: Editura Universității din București Deaca Mircea. 2013. Postfilmic Cinema. Notes and Readings about Contemporary Film (Cinematograful postfilmic. Note și lecturi despre filmul contemporan). Timisoara: Editura Brumar. 318 p.. 200 ill. Deaca Mircea. 2011. Second Camera. Articles and Film Studies (Camera secunda. Articole și studii de film). Timisoara: Editura Brumar. 300 p.. 400 ill Deaca Mircea. 2009. Le Carnaval et le Film de Fellini. Bucuresti: Editura Libra. (french). 500 p.. 1.300 ill. Deco. G. & Roland. P.. 2010. The role of multi-area interactions for the computation of apparent motion. NeuroImage. 51. 1018–1026. Deleuze Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. London: The Athlone Press (1983). Deleuze Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. London: Athlone (1985). Deleuze Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1985. Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press [1975]. Des Marais Christina. 20114. “Video Game Uses Brain to Control Action.” TechHive. http://www.pcworld.com/article/241993/video_game_uses_brain_to_control_action.html Devereaux Mary. 2006. ‘‘Beauty and Evil: The Case of Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will.’’. Carroll Noël (with Jinhee Choi) (eds.). Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Malden. Blackwell Publishing (Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. ed. Jerrold Levinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998: 227–56). pp.347-361 Dmytryk Edward. 1986. On Filmmaking. London: Focal Press. 27–33. manual Doane Mary Ann. 1982. ‘Film and the Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator’. in Screen. 23 (1982). p. 81. Doane M.A.. 1987. The Desire to Desire: The Woman’s Film of the 1940s. Bloomington. Ind.: Indiana University Press. sem Doane Mary Ann. 1992. “Information. Crisis. Catastrophe.” In Logics of Television: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Ed. Patricia Mellancamp. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1990. 222-39 Dolar Mladen. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Dubois Philippe. 2004. La question du figural. in Pierre Taminiaux & Claude Murcia (eds.). Cinema. Art(s) plastique(s). LHarmattan. coll. Champs visuels. Paris. Durgnat Raymond. 1974. The Strange Case of . London: Faber & Faber. Durgnat Raymond. 2002. A Long hard Look at ‘Psycho’. London: BFI Publishing. Dyer Richard. 1986. Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. British Film Institute. post-feminism Dyer Richard. 2002 [1992]. Only Entertainment. Routledge

E Eder, Jens. 2006. “Ways of Being Close to Characters.” Film Studies: An International Review (8): 68–80. Eder, Jens. 2008. Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. Eisenstein Sergei M.. 1943. The Film Sense. trans. and ed. Jay Leyda. London: Faber and Faber. manual Eitzen Dirk. 1993 fall. “Attending to the Fiction”. Post-Script. Essays in Film and the Humanities vol.13 (1) p.46-60. Cog Eitzen, Dirk. 1995. When Is a Documentary?: Documentary as a Mode of Reception. Cinema Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Autumn, 1995), pp. 81-102. Eitzen Dirk. 2010. The Fun of Fear: Horror. Suspense. and Halloweeen. http://scsmionline.org/forum/the-fun-of- fear-horror-suspense-and-halloween. cog Eitzen, Dirk. 2012. The Nature of Film Comedy, or Why Is Shaun of the Dead Funny? Projections. Volume 6, Issue 2, Winter 2012: 1–17 Eitzen Dirk. 2014. Effects of Entertaining Violence. A Critical Overview of the General Aggression Model. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. cog Elsaesser Thomas & Buckland Warren. 2002. Studying Contemporary American Film. A Guide to Movie Analysis. Oxford University Press. Elsaesser, Thomas. (2005). European Cinema Face to Face with Hollywood. Amsterdam University Press. Elsaesser Thomas & Malte Hagener. 2009a. Film Theory. Introduction through the Senses. Routledge. Elsaesser Thomas. 2009b. “Tales of Epiphany and Entropy. Paranarrative worlds of You Tube”. in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge – Francis & Taylor. pp. 150-170.

4 Hocus Pocus relația computer creier în jocurile video.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 6

F Fabe Marilyn. 2004. Closely Watched Films. Introduction to the Art of of Narrative Film Technique. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Fayol Michel. 1985. Le récit et sa construction. Une approche de psychologie cognitive. Délachaux & Niestlé. Fayol Michel. 1992. Psychologie cognitive et apprentissage. Chaumont : CDDP de la H.Marne. Feagin, Susan. 1999. Time and Timing, in Passionate Views, ed. Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith. Johns Hopkins University (1999). pp. 168–179. Ferenz Volker. 2009. ”Mementos of contemporary american cinema. Identifying and responding to the unreliable narrator in the movie theater”. in Buckland Warren. 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge – Francis & Taylor. pp.257-286. Fontanille Jacques. 1990. Espaces subjectifs. . BN 8-x-32940 Forceville Charles J. & Urios-Aparisi Eduardo (eds.). 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter Frampton Daniel. 2006. Filmosophy: A Manifesto for a Radically New Way of Understanding Cinema. London: Wallflower Press. Friedberg Anne. 1993. Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press. Friedberg Anne. 2006. The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft. MA: MIT Press. Frow John. 2005. Genre. London: Routledge. genurile

G Galloway Alexander R.. 2006. Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis. MN. London:University of Minnesota Press. Gardies André. 1980. Approche du récit filmique. Albatros. na Gardies Andre. 1999. Decrire a l’ecran. Paris : Meridiens Klincksieck. th Gaudreault André. 1986. « Narrator et narrateur ». in Iris. n° 7. Paris. Gaudreault André. 1988. Du littéraire au filmique. Système du récit. Paris : Méridien Klincksieck. (fisa a5) Gaudreault André & Jost Francois. 1990. Le récit cinématographique. Paris : Nathan. (épuise chez éditeur) (fisa a5) Gaudreault Andre & Jost Francois. 2004. ”Enunciation and Narration”. in Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing.. pp.45-62 Gaudreault André. 2009. From Plato to Lumiere: Narration and Monstration in Literature and Cinema. (trad.) University or Toronto Press. Gormley Paul. 2005. The New-Brutality Film. Race and Affect in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. Intellect Books. Greenaway Peter. 1991. Papers. Ed. Dis-Voir. Gregersen Andreas. 2014. Cognitive Theory and Video Games. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.253-267. video game Gregory Curie. 1995. Image and Mind: Film. Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press. Grodal Torben Kragh. 1994. Cognition. Emotion and Visual Fiction. University of Copenhangen. Department of Film and Media Studies. cog Grodal, Torben. (1997). Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film . Feelings. and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. emo Grodal Torben. 2000. „. the Transient Body. and the Permanent Soul”. Aura 6. 3 (2000):33-53. emo Grodal Torben. 2002. „The Experience of Realism in Audiovisual Representation”. Lights Film and Media Studies Yearbook 2002. Realism and ”Reality” in Film and Media. ed. Anne Jerslev. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. University of Copenhagen. Grodal, Torben. (2009). Embodied Visions: Evolution. Emotion. Culture. and Film. Oxford University Press. emo Grodal Torben. 2014. A General Theory of Comic Entertainment. Arousal. Appraisal. and the PECMA Flow. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. . pp.177-195. cog Gronstad Asjborn. 2008. Transfigurations. Death and Masculinity in American Cinema. Amsterdam University Press. Gueuens Jean-Pierre. 2000. Film Production Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press. Gunning Tom. 1990. "The Cinema of Attraction". In: Thomas Elsaesser (ed . ). Early Cinema: Space. Frame. Narrative. London: British Film Institute 1990: 5 6-62 [orig. 1986) .

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 7 Gunning Tom. 1995. "An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator". In: Linda Williams (ed.): Viewing Positions. New Brunswick. N J: Rutgers University Press. th cult

H Harbord Janet. 2002. Film Cultures. London: Sage Publications. cult ist Hasson Uri. Ohad Landesman. Barbara Knappmeyer. Ignacio Vallines. Nava Rubin. and David J. Heeger. “Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.” Projections: The Journal of Movies and Mind 2. no. 1 (2008): 1–26.. Heath Stephen. 1981. Questions of Cinema. London: Macmillan. th. tx. na. poststr Heath Stephen. 1975 a spring. “Film and System: Terms of Analysis”. part.I. Screen. vol. 16. no.1. pp.48-9. na Heath Stephen. 1975 b summer. “Film and System: Terms of Analysis”. part II. Screen. vol. 16. no.2. pp.91-110. Screen. 16. 1: 7-77; 16. 2:91-113 Heath Stephen. 1976 a spring. “Touch of Evil. the Long Version – A Note”. Screen. vol.17. no.1. pp.115-7 Heath Stephen. 1976 b. “Narrative Space”. Screen 17 (3) p.95-7. na Heath Stephen. 1981. Questions of Cinema. London: Macmillan. Heath Stephen. 1999. 'Cinema and psychoanalysis: parallel histories'. in Bergstrom (1999). Heidbrink, Henriette. 2010. Fictional Characters in Literary and Media Studies. A Survey of the Research. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 67-110. Heidbrink, Henriette. 2014. To Die Right. The Impact of Ludic Forms on the Engagement with Characters. Projections. Volume 8, Issue 1, Summer 2014: 61–82 © Berghahn Journals. Henderson, J.M. 2003. “Human Gaze Control during Real-World Scene Perception.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(11): 498–504. Heywood, C.A., and J. Zihl. 1999. “Motion Blindness.” Pp. 1–16 in Case Studies in the Neuropsychology of Vision, ed. G.W. Humphreys. Hove, England: Psychology Press. Hill J.. P. C. Gibson. R. Dyer. E. A. Kaplan and P. Willemen (eds.). 1998. The Oxford Guide to Film Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hochberg Julian. 1978. The Perception of Motion Pictures. Carterette (ed.) Handbook of Perception vol.X ; N.Y. : Academic Press. vis Hochberg. Julian. 1986. Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff . R. Kaufman. & J. P. Th omas (Eds.). Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processing and perception (pp. 22–1 to 22–64). New York. NY: Wiley. cog Hochberg Julian & Brooks Virginia. 1996. “Movies in the Mind’s Eye”. Bordwell. David & Carroll Noel (eds.). 1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. th Hochberg Julian (Mary A.Peterson. Barbara Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Mind’s Eye. Julian Hochberg On the Perception of Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. Vis Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2010. Characters and Their Plots. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 134-154. Hogan Patrick Colm. 2014. Postcolonial Humor. Attachement. and Yausjiro Ozu’s Early Summer. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.196-213. cog Hojberg Lennard & Schepelern Peter (eds.). 2003. Film Style and Story: A Tribute to Torben Grodal. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. University Of Copenhagen. Hojberg, Lennard (2014). The Circular Camera Movement. Style, Narration, and Embodiment. Projections. Volume 8, Issue 2, Winter 2014: 71–88. Holland, Norman N. (2007). The Neuroscience of Metafilm. Projections. Volume 1, Issue 1, Summer 2007: 59- 74 © Berghahn Journals. Hollingworth, A., C.C. Williams, and J.M. Henderson. 2001. “To See and Remember: Visually Specifi c Information Is Retained in Memory from Previously Attended Objects in Natural Scenes.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8(4): 761–768.

I Ildirar. S.. 2008. Do film illiterates understand basic cinematographic principles? Paper presented at the 29th International Congress of Psychology. Berlin. Germany. July 20–25. Vis Ildirar, S. and Schwan, S. 2014. “First-Time Viewers’ Comprehension of Films: Bridging Shot Transitions.” British Journal of Psychology. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjop.12069 .

J

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 8 Jenkins Henry. 1986. „The Amazing Push-Me/Pull-You : Cognitive Processing Narrational Play and the Comic Film”. in Quarterly of Theory; Criticism and Practice. na Johnson Ben. “Scientists Turn Brain Activity into Moving Images.” Slate 24. no. 9 (2011). http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011/09/24/scientists_turn_brain_activity_into_ moving_images.html (accessed November 19. 2011). Johnson, M.K. 2006. Memory and Reality. American Psychologist 61(8): 760–771. Jost Francois. 1983. ”Narration(s): en deca et au-dela”. in Communications 38. ”Enonciation et cinema”. Jost François. 1984. « Le regard romanesque. Ocularisation et focalisation» in Cadre. 2. « Cinénarrable ». Presses Universitaires de Paris-VIII. th na Jost Francois. 1987. L’oeil-caméra. Presses Universitaires de Lyon. Jost Francois. 1992. Un monde a notre image. Paris : Meridiens Klincksieck. th Juiller Laurent. 2002. Cinema et cognition. Paris : Harmattan.

K Keith Grant Barry (ed.). 2003. Reader III. Austin: University of Texas Press. genurile Keith Grant Barry. 2007. Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology. London: Wallflower Press. genurile Kermabon J. (ed). . Les théories du cinéma aujourd’hui. Cinémaction 47. Klevan Andrew. 2011. Description. in Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge. pp. 70-86. Konigsberg, I. 2007. “Film Studies and the New Science.” Projections 1(1): 1–24. Krakauer Siegfried. 1961. The nature of film. Oxford Univ Press. Krakauer Siegfried. 1997 [1960]. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton N.J.:Princeton University Press [New York: Oxford University Press]. Th Kuenzli Rudolf E . (ed.). 1987. Dada and Surrealist Film. New York: Willis Locker & Owens. Kuleshov Lev. 1974. Kuleshov on Film. (eds.) Levaco Ronald. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Kuntzel Thierry. 1978. "The Film Work". Enclitic. 2 . 1 . 1978 : 38--6 1 [orig. francez 1972]. Kuntzel Thierry. 1980. "The Film Work. 2". Camera Obscura. 1980: 7--68 [orig. francez 1975]. Kurby, C.A. and J.M. Zacks. 2008. “Segmentation in the Perception and Memory of Events.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(2): 72–79.

L Laffay Albert. 1964. Logique du cinéma. Paris : Masson. th. an Lagny Michèle Ropars Marie-Claire Sorlin Pierre. 1986. Générique des années ‘30. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes. an Lane. A.. 2011 (November 7). Home movies. The New Yorker. 90–91 Langford Barry. 2005. Film Genre: Hollywood and Beyond. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. genurile De Lauretis T. 1984. Alice Doesn’t: Feminism. Semiotics. Cinema. Bloomington. Ind. : Indiana University Press. Leutrat Jean-Louis. 1990. La prisonnière du désert. Une tapisserie navajo. Paris : Adam Biro. Leutrat Jean-Louis Liandrat-Guigues Suzanne. 1990. Les Cartes de l’Ouest. Paris : Armand Colin. Levin, D.T., et al. 2002. “Memory for Centrally Attended Changing Objects in an Incidental Real-World Change Detection Paradigm.” British Journal of Psychology 93(3): 289–302. Levin T. Daniel. Alicia M.Hymel & Lewis Baker. 2013. Belief. Desire. Action and Other Stuff : Theory of Mind in Movies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 244-266. Lipkin Steven N. 2002. Real Emotional Logic. Film and television as Persuasive Practice. Southern Illinois University Press. emo documentar Lotman Iouri. 1976. Semiotics of Cinema. trans. Mark E.Suino. Michigan Slavic Contributions 5 (Ann Arbor ; Department of Slavic Language and Literature. University of Michigan) (1977; Paris:editions Sociales). Lyotard Jean-Francois. 1986. “Acinema” in Narrative. Apparatus. Ideology. A Film Theory Reader. ed. Rosen Philip. New York: Columbia University Press [1973. Cinema. Theorie. Lectures. Paris: ed Klincksiek; Revue d’esthetiaque. 2-3-4. 1973. pp.357-69].

M MacBean James Roy. 1985. Vent d’est or Godard and Rocha at the Crossroads. in Bill Nichols (ed.). Movies and Methods. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 91–110. Magliano, J.P., and J.M. Zacks. 2011. “The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event Segmentation.” Cognitive Science 35(8): 1489–1517.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 9 Manovich Lev.. 2002. The Language of New Media. Massachusetts: MIT. media animatie Marie Michel. 1974. « Muriel. un film sonore. un film musical. un film par”. in Muriel. histoire d'une recherche. Paris. Galilée. Martin Adrian. 2011. Incursions. Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge Masson Andre. 1994. Le Récit au cinéma. Paris: Cahiers du cinema – coll. Essais. nar Mauduy Jacques Henriet Gérard. 1989. Géographie du western. Paris : Nathan. an. gn McCabe Colin. 1985. Tracking the Signifier : Theoretical Essays : Film. Linguistics. Literature. Minneapolis. MN: University of Minessota Press. poststr McGurk Harry & John MacDonald. 1976. “Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices.” Nature 264. no. 5588 (1976): 746–748. Metz Christian. 1968. Essais sur la signification au cinéma. vol.1. Paris : Klincksieck (rééd. 1971 1976). sé Metz Christian. 1968. Essais sur la signification au cinéma. vol.2. Paris : Klincksieck (rééd. 1976). sé Metz Christian. 1971. Langage et cinéma. Paris : Larousse. sé Metz Christian. 1974. “Modern Cinema and Narrativity”. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press. se Metz Christian. 1977. Le Signifiant imaginaire. Paris : UGE. coll 10/18. (trad. 1983. Mac Millan) Metz Christian. 1977. Essais sémiotiques. Paris : Klincksieck. sé Metz Christian. 1981. La grande syntagmatique du film narratif. in Communications. 8 – L’analyse structurale du recit. Seuil – coll. Points pp.126-130. nar Metz Christian. 1987. « L’énonciation impersonnelle ou le site du film ». Vertigo 1 - Le Cinéma au miroir. pp.13-34. én Metz Christian. 1991. L’Enonciation impersonnelle ou le site du film. Paris : Méridiens Klincksieck. én Michelle. C.. 2007. Modes of reception: A consolidated analytical framework. Communication Review. 10 . 81– 222 .. recepție Mitry Jean. 1965. Esthetique et psycholosgie du cinema. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. th clasic Mitry Jean. 1997. The Aestetics and Psychology of the Cinema. (trad. Cristopher King). Bloomington: Indiana University Press Mobbs. D. . Wieskopf. N. . Lau. H. C. . Featherstone. E. . Dolan. R. J. . & Frith. C.. 2006. The Kuleshov effect: The infl uence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. Social. Cognitive. and Affective Neuroscience. 1. 95–106. cog Moine Raphaëlle. 2008. trans. Alistair Fox and Hilary Radner. Cinema Genre. Oxford: Blackwell. genurile Morin Edgar. 1956. Le Cinéma ou l’homme imaginaire. Paris : Ed . de Minuit. (2005. The Cinema. or the Imaginary Man. Minneapolis. MN : University of Minnesota Press). th Mulvey Laura. 1975. « Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema ». Screen. vol. 16. 1::. 3 - automne 1975. th psy Mulvey Laura. 2006. Death 24x a Second: Stillness and the Moving Image. London: Reaktion Books. fem Munsterberg Hugo. 1970 (1916). The Film – A psychological Study: The Silent Photoplay in 1916. New York: Dover Publications. th Murch Walter. 2001. In the Blink of Eye: A Perspective on Film Editing. 2nd ed.. Los Angeles: Silman-James Press. 2001. p.18. manual

N Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. Nannicelli, Ted. 2014. Arthur P. Shimamura, ed., Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), Book Review. Projections. Volume 8, Issue 1, Summer 2014: 126–134 © Berghahn Journals Nasta Dominique. 1991. Meaning in Film - Relevant structures in soundtrack and narrative. Peter Lang: Berne. Nasta Dominique & Huvelle Didier (eds.). 2004. Le son en perspective : nouvelles recherches. Peter Lang: Berne. sonor Nasta Dominique. 2013. Contemporary Romanian Cinema. The History of Unexpected Miracle. Columbia University Press. ist Ndalianis Angela. 2004. Neo-Baroque Aesthetics and Contemporary Entertainment. The MIT Press: Cambridge. Massachusetts. ist Neale Steve. 1990. Genre. London: BFI. genurile Neale Steve. 2002. Genre and Contemporary Hollywood. London: BFI. genurile Neale Stephen. 2000. Genre and Hollywood. London: Routledge. genurile Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. th Nichols Bill (ed.). 1976. Movies and Methods. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Nichols Bill. 1991. Representing Reality. Indiana UP: Bloomington. documentar

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 10 Nichols Bill. 1994. Blurred Boundaries. Indiana UP: Bloomington. documentar Nichols Bill. 2001. Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press. documentar Noguez Dominique. 1979. Eloge du cinéma expérimental. Paris : Centre Georges Pompidou. experiment Noguez Dominique. 1985. Une renaissance du cinéma. Le cinéma « underground » américain. Paris : Klincksieck. th peint

O Oatley Keith. 2013. How Cues on the Screen Prompt Emotions in the Mind. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.269-284. cog Odin Roger. 1979. ”Rhétorique du film de famille”. Rhétoriques sémiotiques; Revue d’esthétique 1-2 UGE 10/18 p.340-373. sém Odin Roger. 1980. ”L’entrée du spectateur dans la fiction”. Théorie du film. Albatros. sém Odin Roger. 1983. ”Pour une sémio-pragmatique du cinéma”. Iris 1 p.6-81. sém Odin Roger. 1983. ”Mise en phase; déphasage et performativité dans Le Tempestaire de Jean Epstein”. Communications 38 - Enonciation et cinéma - p.213-238 Seuil. sém Odin Roger. 1984. ”Lecture documentarisante ; film documentaire”. Cinémas et réalités CIEREC Université de Saint-Etienne p.263-280. sém Odin Roger. 1985. ”Un film-favola”. Carte Semiotiche 1 settembre. sém Odin Roger. 1988. ”Semiotica e analisi testuale dei film”. Bianco e Nero 11 p.7-30. an Odin Roger. 1988. ”Du spectateur fictionnalisant au nouveau spectateur. Approche sémio-pragmatique”. Iris. 8; Narrateur; personnage; spectateur; tome II p.121-39. sém Odin Roger. 1989. ”La sémio-pragmatique du cinéma sans crise ni désillusion”. Hors-Cadre 7 - Théories du cinéma et crise de la théorie p.77-92. sém Odin Roger. 1991. Cinéma et production du sens. Paris : Armand Colin. th. an. sé Odin Roger & Casetti F.. 1985. ”L’analisi del film oggi”. Carte Semiotiche 1 settembre p.25-94. an Odin Roger & Casetti F.. 1988. ”De la paléo à la néo-télévision”. Communications 51 : Télévisions / Mutations. Odin Roger 1989. „A semio-pragmatic approach of the documentary”. in Willem de Greef & Willem Hesling (eds.) Image Reality Spectator. Essays on and Television. Acco: Leuven p.90- 100. sém Odin Roger. 1994. „Semio-pragmatique du cinema et de l’audiovisuel: Modes et institutions”. Towards a Pragmatics of the Audio-Visual. vol.1. et. Jurgen Muller. Munster : Nodus Publikationen. pp.33- 46. Odin Roger. 1994b. „Approche semio-pragmatique. approche historique”. Kodikas/Code. 17 1-4 pp.27-36. Odin Roger. 2000. De la fiction. De Boeck Universite. th pragm Oudart Jean-Pierre. 1969. „La Suture”. Cahiers du Cinema. no.211 & 212. th an Oudart Jean-Pierre. 1977. Cinema and Suture. Screen 18 (winter 1977/1978). p.35-47

P Paisley Livingston 4 Carl Plantinga (eds.). 2009. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London and New York: Routledge. cog Palmer R. Barton. 1989. The Cinematic Text. New York: QMS Press. an. tx Panofsky Erwin. 1995.“Style and Medium in the Motion Pictures.” in Three Essays on Style. Ed. Irving Lavin. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1995. 91-125 Pepperman Richard D.. 2004. The Eye is Quicker: Film Editing: Making a Good Film Better. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions. p.11. vis Person Per. 2003. Understanding Cinema: A Psychological Theory of Moving Imagery. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. emo Phillips Patrick. 2012. Spectator. Audience and Response. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.113-141 Phillips Patrick. 2012. Before getting to the bigger picture. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.60-78. Pitiot Pierre. 1972. Cinema de mort. Esquisse d’un baroque cinematographique. Edition du Signe. (fisa a5) Plantinga Carl. 1993 fall. „Affect; Cognition and the Power of Movies”. in Post-Script. Essays in Film and the Humanities vol.13 (1). cog Plantinga Carl. 1997. Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. documentar Plantinga Carl & Smith Greg M. (eds.). 1999. Passionate Views: Film. Cognition. and Emotion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. emo

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 11 Plantinga Carl. 2002. „Cognitive Film Theory: Insider’s Appraisal”. in Cinemas. Journal of Film Studies. vol.12. nr.2 (winter 2002) pp.15-37. cog Plantinga Carl. 2009 a.”Trauma. Pleasure and Emotion in the Viewing of Titanic. A Cognitive Approach”. in Buckland Warren (ed.). 2009. Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies. Routledge – Francis & Taylor. pp. 237- . nu Plantinga Carl. 2009 b. Moving Viewers:American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. University of California Press. Berkeley. Plantinga Carl. 2013. The Affective Power of Movies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.94- 111. cog Plantinga Carl. 2014. Mood and Ethics in Narrative Film. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 141-157. cog Pribram E. Deirdre. 2004. “Spectatorship and Subjectivity”. in Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing. pp.146-164 Price. Brian. 2006. Color. the Formless. and Cinematic Eros. In Color: The Film Reader. eds. Angela Dalle Vacche and Brian Price. New York: Routledge. 85

Q Quigley Cliodhna. Selim Onat. Sue Harding. Martin Cooke. Peter König. 2008. “Audio-Visual Integration During Overt Visual Attention.” Journal of Eye Movement Research 1. no. 2 (2008): 1–17.

R Radvansky, G.A., and J.M. Zacks. 2014. Event Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press. Ranciere, Jacques. (2006). Film Fables. Oxford-NY:Berg. Ranciere, Jacques. (2009), The Emancipated Spectator, London: Verso. Raz Gal. Boaz Hagin & Telma Hendler. 2013. E-Motion Pictures of the Brain: Recursive Paths Between Affective Neuroscience and Film Studies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.285- 313. Emo Reicher, Maria E. 2010. The Ontology of Fictional Characters. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 111-133. Richter Hans. 1986. The Struggle for the Film. Towards a socially responsible cinema. New York : St Martin s Press. Riis, Johannes. 2010. Implications of Paradoxical Film Characters for Our Models and Conceptualizations. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 259-275. Rodowick. David. 1991. The Difficulty of Difference: Psychoanalysis. Sexual Difference. and Film Theory. New York and London: Routledge Rodowick David. 2001. Reading the Figural. or. Philosophy after the New Media. Duke University Press. Rodowick David. 2007. The Virtual Life of Film. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press Rogers Sheena. 2013. Truth. Lies. and Meaning in Slow Motion Images.in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.149- 164. vis Rohdin Mats. 2003. Vildsvinet i filmens trädgråd. Metaforbegreppet inom filmteorin [The wild boar in the garden of film: The concept of metaphor in film theory] Summary in English 318–329. Ph.D. diss.. Stockholm:Edita Norstedts Tryckeri AB. Rohdin Mats. 2009. « Multimodal metaphor in classical film theory from the 1920s to the 1950s” in Forceville Charles J. & Urios-Aparisi Eduardo (eds.). 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter. p.403 sq Rohmer Éric. 1977. L'organisation de l'espace dans le « Faust» de F W Murnau. coll. « 10/18 ». Paris: UGE. th peint Ropars Marie-Claire. 1972. « Narration and signification ». in Poétique no 12. en Ropars Marie-Claire. 1976. « L'ouverture d'Octobre ou les conditions théoriques • ca révolution ». in Octobre. écriture et idéologie. Paris. Albatros. th an Ropars Marie-Claire. 1981. Le texte divise. Paris: PUF.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 12 Ropars-Wuilleumier. Marie-Claire. ‘‘The Graphic in FilmicWriting: A bout de souffle. or The Erratic Alphabet.’’ Enclitic 5.2 – 6.1 (spring 1982): 147-61. Deasemenea ‘‘L’Instance graphique dans l’ecriture du Film: A bout de souffle. ou l’alphabet erratique.’’ Litterature 46 (1982): 59-81. Rothman William. 2011. Silence and Stasis. in Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge. pp. 107-120. Rosenthal Alan and Corner John (eds). 2005. New Challenges for Documentary (2nd edn). Manchester University Press. Manchester. documentar Rushton Richard. 2009. Colman Felicity (ed.). 2009. Film. Theory and Philosophy. The Key Thinkers. McGill- Queens University Press. th

S Schaeffer Jean-Marie. 1987. L’image précaire : du dispositif photographique. Paris : Seuil. th (fisa a5) Schefer Jean-Louis. 1980. L’Homme ordinaire au cinéma. Cahiers du cinéma / Gallimard. th psy Schwan S. & Ildirar S.. 2010. Watching film for the first time: How adult viewers interpret perceptual discontinuities in film. Psychological Science . 21 . 1–7. Schwan Stephan. 2013.The Art of Simplifying Events. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 214-226. Seppälä, Jaakko (2015). On the Heterogeneity of Cinematography in the Films of Aki Kaurismäki. Projections. Volume 9, Issue 2, Winter 2015: 20–39 © Berghahn Books. Serceau Daniel. 1987. Le désir de fictions. Paris : éd. Dis-Voir. Shamay-Tsoory S.. 2010. The neural bases for empathy. Neuroscientist . 17 . 18–24. Shaviro Steven. 1993. The Cinematic Body. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis. Shimamura Arthur P. & Stephen E. Palmer (eds.). 2012. Aesthetic Science: Connencting Minds. Brains. and Experience. Oxford UP. Shimamura, Arthur P.. (2013 a). Experiencing Art: In the Brain of the Beholder. Oxford UP. Shimamura, Arthur P. (ed.). (2013 b). Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. Silver Curtis. 2009. “Neurocinema Aims to Change the Way Movies are Made.” Wired.com. http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/09/neurocinema-aims-to-change-theway-movies-are-made/ 5 Silverman Kaja. 1983. The Subject of Semiotics. New York : Oxford University Press. Silverman Kaja. 1988. The Acoustic Mirror. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Simmons Lawrence. 2009. ”Slavoj Zizek”. in Colman Felicity (ed.). 2009. Film. Theory and Philosophy. The Key Thinkers. McGill-Queens University Press. th Simon J. P. et Vernet M.. 1983. Enonciation et cinéma. Communications 38 - Seuil. Simon Jean-Paul. 1979. Le Filmique et le comique. Paris : Albatros. Simon Jean-Paul. 1983. Enonciation et narration. in Communications 38. Paris : Seuil. Simons Daniel J. and Levin Daniel T.. 2007. Ideas of Lasting Influence. Hochberg’s Anticipation of Research on Change Blindness and Motion Picture Perception. in Hochberg Julian (Mary A.Peterson. Barbara Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Mind’s Eye. Julian Hochberg. On the Perception of Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. Simons Jan. . “Pragmatics. Deixis. and the Political Election-Campaign Film”. Towards a Pragmatics of the Audio-Visual. vol. 1. 79 Sinnerbrink Robert. 2011. Questioning Style. In Clayton Alex & Andrew Klevan (eds.). 2011. The Language and Style of Film Criticism. London- N.Y..: Routledge. Sinnerbrink Robert. 2011. New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images. London and New York: Continuum. Small Edward S.. 1980 Cinévideo and mental images. Cinévideo and Psychology. Journal of the University Film Association winter-spring 32 n1-2. Smith Murray. 2014. “The Pit of Naturalism”. Neuroscience and the Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge . pp.28-45. cog Smith Murray. 2012. Triangulating Aesthetic Experience. Shimamura Arthur P. & Stephen E. Palmer (eds.). 2012. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds. Brains. and Experience. Oxford UP. pp.80-106. cog Smith, Murray. 2010. Engaging Characters: Further Reflections. In Eder Jens and Fotis Jannidis, Ralf Schneider (eds.). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. 232-258. Smith Murray. 1995. Engaging Characters: Fiction. Emotion. and the Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5 Scanarea creier pentru testarea audienței.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 13 Smith Murray. 1993 fall. “Cognitive; Emotion and Cinematic Narrative”. in Post-Script. Essays in Film and the Humanities vol.13 (1). cog Smith M. Greg. 2003. Film Structure and the Emotion System. Cambridge University Press. emo Smith M. Greg. 2014. Coming out of the Corner. The Challenges of a Broader Media Cognitivism. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 285-302. Cog Smith, T.J., and J.M. Henderson. 2008. “Edit Blindness: The Relationship between Attention and Global Change in Dynamic Scenes.” Journal of Eye Movement Research 2(2): 1–17. Smith Tim J.. Parag K. Mital. Tim J. Smith. Robin L. Hill. and John M. Henderson. 2011. “Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion.” Cognitive Computation 3. no. 1 (2011): 5–24.. vis Smith Tim J.. 2012. “The Attentional Theory of Cinematic Continuity.” Projections: The Journal for Movies and the Mind 6. no. 1 (2012): 1–27.. cog Smith Tim J.. Daniel Levin. James E. Cutting. 2012. “A Window on Reality: Perceiving Edited Moving Images.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21. no. 2 (2012): 107–113. Smith Tim J.. Melissa L.-H. Võ. Tim J. Smith. Parag K. Mital. and John M. Henderson. 2012. “Do the Eyes Really Have it? Dynamic Allocation of Attention When Viewing Moving Faces.” Journal of Vision 12. no. 13 (2012): 1–14. Smith Tim J.. 2013. “Watching You Watch Movies: Using Eye Tracking to Inform Cognitive Film Theory.” in Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. ed. Arthur P. Shimamura (New York: Oxford University Press. 2013). 165–191.. cog Smith, T.J., and P.K. Mital. 2013. “Attentional Synchrony and the Infl uence of Viewing Task on Gaze Behavior in Static and Dynamic Scenes.” Journal of Vision 13(8): 16. Smith Tim J.. 2014. Correspondences in Sergei Eisenstein’s Alexander Nevsky. A Case Study in Viewer Attention. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 85-105 Smith Tim J. and Parag. K. Mital. 2013. “Attentional Synchrony and the Influence of Viewing Task on Gaze Behaviour in Static and Dynamic Scenes.” Journal of Vision 13. no. 8 (2013): 16. Smith Tim & John Henderson. 2008. “Attentional Synchrony in Static and Dynamic Scenes.” Journal of Vision 8. no. 6 (2008): 773.. Sobchack Vivian. 1982. “Toward Inhabited Space: The Semiotic Structure of Camera Movement in the Cinema”. Semiotica 41. ¼. (1982). p.318 sq Sobchack Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye. A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Sobchack Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts. Embodiment and Moving Image culture. University of California Press. Sonnenschein D.. 2001. Sound design: The expressive power of music. voice. and sounds effects in cinema. Studio City. CA : Michael Wiese Productions. sonor Sorlin Pierre. 1977. Sociologie du cinéma. Paris : Aubier. soc Speidel Susan. 2012. Film Form and Narrative. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.80-112. Spoto Donald. 1976. The Art of Alfred Hitchcock. New York: Doubleday. Stam Robert. 1989. Subversive Pleasure: Bakhtin. Cultural Criticism. and film. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. poststr (fisa a5) Stam Robert. 2000. Film theory: Introduction. Malden. MA. Oxford: Blackwell. Stam Robert & Miller Toby. 2004. A Companion to Film Theory. Blackwell Publishing Stam Robert. 2005. “Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Ed. Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo. Malden. MA: Blackwell. 2005. 1-52. Stewart Garrett. 2007. Framed Time: Toward a Postfilmic Cinema. Chicago. IL. and London: University of Chicago Press. poststr Stoichita Victor Ieronim. 2014. Efectul Sherlock Holmes. Trei intrigi cinematografice. Bucuresti: Editura Humanitas Suckfull Monika. 2013. Emotion Regulation by Switching Between Modes of Reception. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 314-336. Emo Swallow, K.M., J.M. Zacks, and R.A. Abrams. 2009. “Event Boundaries in Perception Affect Memory Encoding and Updating.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(2): 236–257. Swallow, K.M., et al. 2011. “Changes in Events Alter How People Remember Recent Information.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(5): 1052–1064.

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 14

T Taberham Paul. 2014. Avant-garde Film in Evolutionary Context. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.214-231. cog Tan Ed S.. 1996. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as Emotional Machine. Hillsdale: N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum. cog Tan Ed S.. 2007. On the Cognitive Ecology of the Cinema. in Hochberg Julian (Mary A. Peterson. Barbara Gillam. H.A. Sedgwick. eds.). 2007. In the Mind’s Eye. Julian Hochberg On the Perception of Pictures. Films. and the World. Oxford University Press. vis Tan Ed S.. 2013. The Empathic Animal Meets the Inquisitive Animal in the Cinema: Notes on a Psychocinematics of Mind Reading. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.337-367. emo Tan Ed S.. 2014. Engaged and Detached Film Viewing. Exploring Film Viewers Emotional Action Readiness. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. p.106-123. cog Thomson-Jones Katherine J.. 2013. Sensing Motion in Movies. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.115- 132. cog Thompson K.. 1981. Eisenstein’s Ivan the Terrible: A Neoformalist Analysis. Princeton University Press. form Thompson K.. 1988. Breaking the Glass Armour. Neoformalist Film Analysis. Princeton University Press. form Truffaut Francois. 1975. Le Cinema selon Hitchcock. Paris : Robert Laffont (reed. 1966). th Turvey Malcom. 2014. Evolutionary Film Theory. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. cog

V Vaage, Margrethe Bruun. 2010. Fiction Film and the Varieties of Empathic Engagement. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXXIV (2010) 158-179. Vaage Margrethe Bruun. 2014. Blinded by Familiarity. Partiality. Morality. and Engagement with TV Series. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp.268-284. cog Vanoye Francis. 1989. Récit écrit - récit filmique. Paris : Nathan. th. an Vanoye Francis. 1991. Scénarios modèles - modèles de scénarios. Paris : Nathan. th. an. sc Vanoye Francis. 1992. Précis d’analyse filmique. Paris : Nathan. th. an Vanoye Francis. 2005. Récit écrit. récit filmique. Paris : Nathan. 1989. Armand Colin Cinema. nar Vernet Marc. 1983. « Le regard à la caméra ». Iris. n° 2. psy Vernet Marc. 1985. « Figures de l’absence 2: la voix off ». Iris. n° 5. psy Vernet Marc. 1986. « Le personnage de film ». Iris. n 7. psy an Vernet Marc. 1988. Figures de l’absence. Paris : Cahiers du cinema. Marc Vernet. “The Look at the Camera.” Cinema Journal 28. no. 2 (winter 1989): 52. 48-63. . Veron Eliseo. 1983. Il est là. il me voit. il me parle. Communications 38 - Seuil. sem Veron Eliseo. 1986. Les spectacles scientifiques télévisés. Figures de la production et de la réception. Documentation française. sem soc Veron Eliseo. 1987. La sémiosis sociale. PUV. sem soc Vighi Fabio. 2009. Sexual Difference in European Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan. fell

W Ward Paul. 2008. Drama-documentary. Ethics and Notions of Performance: The “Flight 93” Films. in T. Austin and W. de Jong (eds). Re-thinking Documentary: New Perspectives. New Practices. McGraw- Hill/Open University Press. Maidenhead. 2008. pp. 191–203. documentar Ward Paul. 2012. The Documentary Form. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.210-228. docum Wartenberg Thomas E & Angela Curran (eds.). 2005. The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Text and Readings. Malden. MA: Blackwell. philo Watson Paul. 2012. Cinematic Authorship and the Film Auteur. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.142-164 Watson Paul. 2012. Star Studies: Text. Pleasure. Identity. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.166-185 Watson Paul. 2012. Approaches to Film Genre – taxonomy/genericity/metaphor. in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.188-208

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 15 Wells Paul. 2012. The Language of . in Nelmes Jill (ed.). 2012. Film Studies. (Fifth edition) London & N.Y.: Routledge. pp.229-259. th animatie Winston Wheeler Dixon & Foster Gwendolin Audrey. 2008. A History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. hist Wolfe Jeremy M. & Todd S. Horowitz. 2004. “What Attributes Guide the Deployment of Visual Attention and How Do They Do It?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 (2004): 1–7.. vis Wong, Cindy Hing-Yuk (2011). Film Festivals: Culture, Power and the Global Screen. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP. Worth Sol. 1968. ”Cognitive Aspects of Sequence in Visual Communication”. Audio-Visual Communication Review 16 - 2. vis Worth Sol. 1969. ”The Development of Semiotics of Film”. Semiotica. Mouton. vol.I. no.3 sem vis Worth Sol & Adair J.. 1972. Through Navajo Eyes: Exploration in Film Communication and Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. BN 8-r-76402. antr Wuss . P. ( 2009 ). Cinematic narration and its psychological impact: Function of cognition. emotion and play . Newcastle upon Tyne. England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. eco

Z Zacks Jeffrey M.. 2013. Constructing Event Representations during Film Comprehension. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 227-243. cog Zimmerman Patricia R.. 1988.”Professional Result with Amateur Ease: The Formation of Amateur Filmmaking Aesthetics”. in Film History vol.2 p.267-281. amateur Zizek Slavoj. 1992.”In His Bold Gaze My Ruin Is Writ large”. Everything you always wanted to know about Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hitchcock). (ed.) Slavoj Zizek. New York: Verso. 210-72. psi Zizek Slavoj. 1992b. Looking Awry Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. October Books. psi Zizek Slavoj. 1999.”The Hitchcockian Blot”. in Alfred Hitchcock: Centenary Essays. (ed.) Richard Allen & S. Ishii-Gozales. London: British Film Institute. psi Zizek Slavoj. 2001. The Fright of Real Tears: Kriysztof Kieslowski Between Theory and Post-Theory. London: British Film Insitute. psi Žižek Slavoj. 2007. How to Read Lacan. New York: Norton. psi

Legende: nu : http://library.nu/ http://aaaaarg.org/ http://gen.lib.rus.ec/

E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 16