A b c d e___ f g h__ i j k l m n o p r s__ t u v Allen Richard. 1995. Projecting Illusion: Film Spectatorship and the Impression of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Altman Rick. 1999. Film/Genre. London: BFI. genurile Anderson Barbara. 1980. “Eye Movement and Cinematic Perception.” Journal of the University Film Association 32. nos. 1 and 2 (1980): 23–26.. cog Anderson Joseph D.. 1993 fall. A Cognitive Approach to continuity. Post-Script. Essays in Film and the Humanities vol.13 (1) p.61-66. eco Anderson Joseph. 1996. The Reality of Illusion: Ecologigal Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. eco Anderson. J. D.. & Anderson. B. F.. 1996. The case for ecological metatheory. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.). Post theory: Reconstructing film studies (pp. 347–367). Madison. WI : University of Wisconsin Press. eco Anderson Joseph D. & Barbara Fisher Anderson (eds.). 2005. Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations. Carbondale. IL: Southern Illinois University Press. eco Anderson Joseph D.. 2013. Toward ecology of the arts. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.76- 93. eco Andre Emmanuelle. 2007. Estetique du motif. Cinéma. musique. peinture. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes. Andrew Dudley. 1976. The Major Film Theories : Introduction. New York : Oxford University Press. Andrew Dudley. 1977. « The Gravity of Sunrise ». Quarterly Review of film studies. vol. 2. no. 3. Andrew Dudley. 1984. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press. th classic Andrew Dudley. 2010. What Cinema is? Bazin’s Quest and its Charge. Wiley-Blackwell. Arnheim Rudolf. 1973. Vers une psychologie de l’art. Paris: Seghers. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1974. Art and visual perception. Los Angeles. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1976. La Pensée visuelle (1969). Flammarion. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1982. The Power of the Center. University of California Press. th Arnheim Rudolf. 1983. Film as Art London:Faber & Faber. (1957. original german 1932) Berkeley and Los Angles: University of Californa Press /. th clasic Aumont Jacques. 1987 [1979]. Montage Eisenstein. Bloomington. IN:Indiana University Press. Aumont Jacques. 1980. L'espace et la matière ». in Théorie du film. Paris. A.J:.atros. th an Aumont J. Bergala A. Marie M. Vernet M.. 1983. L’Esthétique du film. Paris : Nathan. th Aumont Jacques. 1984. Vertov et la vue. in Cinémas et réalités. CIEREC Tra1Q....X XLI. Université de Saint- Étienne. th peint Aumont Jacques. 1984 b. Notes sur un fragment de La Chinoise. de Godard. Sémiologiques. Linguistique et sémiologie. n0 6. Presses Universitaires de Lyon. th peint Aumont Jacques. 1986. « Godard Peintre ». in Revue belge du cinéma – Jean-Luc Godard. Les films. no.16 Aumont J. Marie M.. 1988. L ’Analyse des films. Paris : Nathan. th. an. tx Aumont Jacques. 1992. Du visage au cinema. Paris : Editions de l’Etoile. th Aumont Jacques. 1994. Introduction a la couleur : des discours aux images. Paris : Armand Colin. th Aumont Jacques (ed.). 1995. La couleur en cinema. Mazzotta : Cinematheque francaise. th Aumont Jacques. 1997 [1990]. The Image. London : British Film Institute. Aumont J. Bergala A. Marie M. Vernet M. (3e ed.). 2008. L’Esthétique du film. Paris : Armand Colin. th. Aumont J. Marie M. (2e ed.). 2008 b. L ’Analyse des films. Paris : Armand Colin : coll. cinéma. th. an. tx Aumont Jacques (2e ed.). 2010. Le cinéma et la mise en scène. Paris : Armand Colin coll. cinéma. th an B Baird Robert. 2000. “The Startle Effect: Implications for Spectator Cognition and Media Theory.” Film Quarterly 53. no. 3 (2000): 12–24 Balazs Bela. 1970. (1945). Theory of the Film: Character and Growth of a New Art. trad. Edith Bone. New York: Dover. th Barratt Daniel. 2014. The Geography of Film Viewing. What are the Implications of Cultural-Cognitive Differences for Cognitive Film Theory?. in Nannicelli Ted & Paul Taberham (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Media Theory. Routledge. pp. 62-82 Baudry Jean-Louis. 1978. L’Effet cinéma. Paris : Albatros. psy Bazin Andre. 1958. Qu’est-ce que le cinema ?. vol.I-IV. Paris : Editions du cerf. (Ce este cinematograful ?. Bucureşti. Editura Meridiane 1968). th clas Bazin Andre. 1967 vol.1 – 1972 vol.2. What is Cinema ?. Berkeley: University of California Press. classic E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 1 Bellour Raymond. 1975. The Unattainable Text. Screen 16 no.3 (autumn 1975): 19-28. Bellour Raymond. 1980. Le Cinéma américain. Analyses de film 2vol.. Paris : Flammarion. an Bellour Raymond. 1980. L’Analyse du film. Paris: Albatros. th. BN 8-v-78166 (18). (The Analysis of Film. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press. 2002) 1 . poststr Bellour Raymond. 1988. Analyse du film. (2002. The Analysis of Film (edited by Constance Penley). Bloomington. IN : Indiana University Press. an Bellour Raymond. 1989. « Le malheur d’énoncer » in Le Mal au cinéma : textes inédits. Dunkerque : Studio 43. th Bellour Raymond. 1990. L’Entre-images : photo; cinéma; video. La Différence. BN 8-v-101488 Bellour Raymond. 1990. Cinéma et peinture. PUF. th BN 16-v-18807 Bellour Raymond. 1995. Le blocage symbolique. L’analyse du film. Bellour Raymond. 2009. Le Corps du cinema. Hypnoses – emotions – animalites. Paris: P.O.L.. coll. Trafic. emo Bellour Raymond. 2010. “Deleuze: The Thinking of the Brain.” Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image 1 (2010): 81–94. http://cjpmi.ifl.pt/1-deleuze/ Ben-Shaul Nitzan. 2007. Film. The Key Concepts. Berg: Oxford-N.Y. Ben-Shaul Nitzan. 2008. Hyper-Narrative Interactive Cinema. Problems and Solutions. Amsterdam-N.Y. : Rodopi Bergala Alain. Initiation a la sémiologie du récit en images. les Cahiers de l’Audiovisuel. Berliner Todd. 2013. Hollywood Storytelling and Aesthetic Pleasure. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.195- 213. cog Bettetini G.. 1979. Tempo del senso. La logica temporale dei testi audiovisivi. Milano : Bompiani. én Bettetini G.. 1984. La conversazione audiovisiva. Problemi dell’enunciazione filmica e televisiva. Bompiani.én Bettetini G.. 1991. La simulatione visiva. Milano : Bompiani. én Beylot Pierre. 2005. Le Recit audiovisuel. Paris:Armand Colin Cinema. nar Blanco D.. 1987. Figures discursives de l’énonciation cinématographique. Actes sémiotiques Documents IX 90. én Blankenship Janell & Tobias Nagl (eds.). 2015. European Visions. Small Cinemas in Transition. Bielefeld : Transcript Verlag. Block Bruce. 2001. The Visual Story: Seeing the Structure of Film. TV. and New Media. Woburn. MA: Focal Press. manual Bondanella Peter. 2002. The Films of Federico Fellini. Cambridge University Press. fell Bonitzer Pascal. 1977. La notion de plan et le sujet au cinéma. Cahiers du Clinéma 273 / 275. th Bonitzer Pascal. 1982 a. Le Champ aveugle. Paris – Cahiers de cinema / Gallimard. psy Bonitzer Pascal. 1992 b. “Hitchcockian Suspense”. in Zizek Slavoj (ed). 1992 Everything you always wanted to know about Lacan (But were Afraid to ask Hitchcock. New York: Verso. p.15-31. original in Cahiers du cinema no.8. hors-serie. Bonitzer Pascal. 2000 (1978). „Deframings”. Cahiers du cinema. vol 4. 1973-1978. History. Ideology. Cultural Struggle. ed. David Wilson. Noew York : Routledge. Bordwell David. 1981. The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer. University of California Press. Berkeley. th Bordwell, David. (1985 a). Narration in the Fiction Film. Winsconsin: University of Winsconsin Press. (fisa a5) Bordwell David & Staiger Janet & Thompson Kristin. 1985 b. The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. London : Routledge end Kegan Paul. form Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 1986 (second edition) 1979. Film Art: Introduction. Massachussets: Addison-Wesley. th cog Bordwell David. 1988. Ozu and the Poetics of Cinema. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press. Bordwell. David. 1989. Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bordwell David. 1989b. „A Case for Cognitivism”. in Iris 9 (Spring 1989). pp.11-40. cog Bordwell David. 1990. „A Case for Cognitivism: Further Reflections”. in Iris 11 (Summer 1990). p.107-112. cog Bordwell David. 1993. The Cinema of Eisenstein. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. Bordwell. David & Carroll Noel (eds.). 1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. th 1 See "System of a Fragment" (on THE BIRDS) and "Symbolic Blockage" (on NORTH BY NORTHWEST) in Raymond Bellour: The Analysis '!fFilm (edited by Constance Penley) . Bloomington. IN : Indiana University Press 2002 : 28--68 . 77- 1 9 2 ; Stephen Heath: "Film and System" (two parts). In: Screen . Vol. 1 6 . No. 1 : 7-77 and Vol. 1 6 . No. 2 : 9 1 - 1 1 3 ; editors of Cahiers du Cinema: "John Ford's YOUNG MR. LINCOLN". In: Screen . Vol. 1 3 . No. 5 . autumn 1 972 [orig. French 1 970] . Reprinted in Bill Nichols (ed . ) : Movies and Methods. Vol. 1 . Berkeley. CA: University of California Press 1 976: 493-5 2 9 . E:\vis-cog\Biblio\FILM.DOC 2 Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 2003. A Film History. Introduction (2 ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. hist cog Bordwell David. 2005. Figures Traced in Light. On cinematic staging. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bordwel David. 2006. The Way Hollywood Tells It. Story and Style in Modern Movies. University of California Press. nu Bordwell David. 2007. Poetics of Cinema. Routledge. an Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin. 2008 (eighth edition) 1979. Film Art: Introduction. New York: McGraw Hill. th nu Bordwell David. 2011. blog. http://www.davidbordwell.net/ Bordwell David. 2013. The viewer’s Share: Models of Mind in Explaining Film. in Shimamura Arthur P. (ed.). 2013b. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. London and New York: Routledge. pp.29-52. cog Borgoyne Robert. 1986. The Interaction of Text and Semantic Deep Structure in the Production of Filmic Characters. Iris. Cinema et Narration. volume 1 Bouvier Michel et Leutrat Jean-Louis. 1981. Nosferatu. Paris. Gallimard. Cahiers du Cinéma. th an Boyd. B.. Carroll. J.. & Gottschall. J. (Eds.). (2010) Evolution. Literature. and Film: A Reader.