Kadir Has University School of Graduate Studies Program of Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kadir Has University School of Graduate Studies Program of Design KADİR HAS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAM OF DESIGN CULTURE, COMMODITY AND SPECTATOR UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF GLOBAL INDUSTRY: THE CASE OF KARAKÖY OZAN AKBAŞ SUPERVISORS: PROF. DR. ARZU ERDEM, DOÇ. DR. AYŞE EREK MASTER’S THESIS ISTANBUL, AUGUST, 2019 CULTURE, COMMODITY AND SPECTATOR UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF GLOBAL INDUSTRY: THE CASE OF KARAKÖY OZAN AKBAŞ SUPERVISORS: PROF. DR. ARZU ERDEM, DOÇ. DR. AYŞE EREK MASTER’S THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Kadir Has University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s in the Discipline Area of Art and Design under the Program of MA in Design. ISTANBUL, AUGUST, 2019 CONTENTS CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ v ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... ix ÖZET ................................................................................................................................ x 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................... ....................................................1 1.1 Purpose Of The Thesis ............................................................................................ 3 1.2 Scope Of The Thesıs ............................................................................................... 4 1.3 Method Of The Thesıs ............................................................................................. 7 2. RESEARCH, DEFINITIONS, CONCEPTS & HISTORY THAT IS RELEVANT TO THE STUDY ...................................................................................... 8 2.1 Definition And Concepts Supporting The Study ................................................... 10 Capitalism and the commodity ....................................................................... 10 The phenomenon of deterritorialization ......................................................... 19 Global culture industry and the spectacle ....................................................... 23 2.2 Brief History Of Karaköy ...................................................................................... 26 Karaköy’s location and its importance ........................................................... 28 Karaköy’s historical development .................................................................. 30 Early municipal governance & westernization of Galata in the 19th century . 40 3. THE CASE OF KARAKÖY .................................................................................... 50 3.1 Commerce In Karaköy .......................................................................................... 51 Realizing the commercial transformation via maps on Galata ....................... 53 Recent events that created impact on Karaköy ............................................... 61 3.2 Culture Of Café In Karaköy .................................................................................. 72 Failure as an art district ................................................................................... 73 A global leader of cafés: Starbucks in Karaköy ............................................. 79 3.3 Current Data In The Case Area ............................................................................. 84 User profile in the case area ............................................................................ 85 Business locations & typologies ..................................................................... 91 3.4 Spectacles In Karaköy ........................................................................................... 95 Revival and survival: historical and historicist spectacles in Karaköy ........... 96 Designing for media: commodified spectacles in Karaköy .......................... 108 4. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 120 iii BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................... 128 APPENDIX A .............................................................................................................. 132 APPENDIX B .............................................................................................................. 134 APPENDIX C .............................................................................................................. 135 APPENDIX D .............................................................................................................. 136 APPENDIX E .............................................................................................................. 137 APPENDIX F ............................................................................................................... 138 APPENDIX G .............................................................................................................. 139 CIRRUCULUM VITAE ............................................................................................. 140 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Diagram of the "Spectacle" ............................................................................. 6 Figure 1.2 Case Region ..................................................................................................... 6 Figure 1.3 Karaköy Demolitions, Salt Archives ............................................................... 7 Figure 2.1 Macy’s Christmas Window ........................................................................... 13 Figure 2.2 A covered passage, Paris ............................................................................... 13 Figure 2.3 Location of Beyoğlu in Istanbul .................................................................... 28 Figure 2.4 Map of Beyoğlu ............................................................................................. 29 Figure 2.5 Karaköy (Google Maps) ................................................................................ 29 Figure 2.6 Case Area of the Research ............................................................................. 30 Figure 2.7 Fourteen districts of Byzantine city in 4th century ........................................ 31 Figure 2.8 Galata Walls 15th century ............................................................................. 32 Figure 2.9 Map of Cristoforo Baudelmonte .................................................................... 34 Figure 2.10 Vavassore's Istanbul Gravure ...................................................................... 36 Figure 2.11 Closer Look ................................................................................................. 36 Figure 2.12 Braun & Hogenberg's view of İstanbul ....................................................... 37 Figure 2.13 Closer Look ................................................................................................. 38 Figure 2.14 Miniature Map of Matrakçı Nasuh .............................................................. 39 Figure 2.15 d’Ostoya’s Karaköy Pera Map..................................................................... 39 Figure 2.16 A passageway in Galata Walls .................................................................... 41 Figure 2.17 İstanbul Municipal Bureaus ......................................................................... 41 Figure 2.18 New Larger Streets of Galata ...................................................................... 43 Figure 2.19 1913 Karaköy-Tophane Tramway Line....................................................... 44 Figure 2.20 The coastline between Tophane and Karaköy ............................................. 46 Figure 2.21 Dimitrios Kalumenos’ Photo ....................................................................... 48 Figure 2.22 Karaköy Docks ............................................................................................ 49 Figure 2.23 Karaköy Demolitions ................................................................................... 49 Figure 3.1 Appearance of Mumhane St on Goad Map 1904-1906 ................................. 54 Figure 3.2 Appearance of Mumhane St on Nirven Map 1946 ........................................ 55 Figure 3.3 Appearance of Mumhane St IBB Map 2016 ................................................. 55 Figure 3.4 The Functional Map of Mumhane Street from the study of Küçük,2012 ..... 55 Figure 3.5 Baransü’s case area and codes ....................................................................... 58 v Figure 3.6 The Function List of the Businesses in the region ......................................... 59 Figure 3.7 Recent Timeline of highlights ....................................................................... 62 Figure 3.8 Galataport Project Site ................................................................................... 66 Figure 3.9 Intensity of Tweeting in One Minute - Illustration ........................................ 68 Figure 3.10 Paşabahçe’s Closure Photo by Erdem Dilbaz .............................................. 69 Figure 3.11 2015 Function Change Map ........................................................................ 71 Figure 3.12 1995 Biennale
Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Transiting the Turkish Straits (Second Edition March 2021) 2 – Guidelines for Transiting the Turkish Straits
    Guidelines for Transiting the Turkish Straits (Second edition March 2021) 2 – Guidelines for Transiting the Turkish Straits Issued by the Oil Companies International Marine Forum 29 Queen Anne’s Gate London SW1H 9BU United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)20 7654 1200 Email: [email protected] www.ocimf.org Second edition March 2021 © Oil Companies International Marine Forum The Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) Founded in 1970, the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) is a voluntary association of oil companies having an interest in the shipment and terminalling of crude oil, oil products, petrochemicals and gas, and includes companies engaged in offshore marine operations supporting oil and gas exploration, development and production. Our vision is a global marine industry that causes no harm to people or the environment. Our mission is to lead the global marine industry in the promotion of safe and environmentally responsible transportation of crude oil, oil products, petrochemicals and gas, and to drive the same values in the management of related offshore marine operations. We do this by developing best practices in the design, construction and safe operation of tankers, barges and offshore vessels and their interfaces with terminals and considering human factors in everything we do. Terms of Use While the advice given in this information paper (“Paper”) has been developed using the best information currently available, it is intended purely as guidance to be used at the user’s own risk. No responsibility is accepted
    [Show full text]
  • The Multi-Purpose Bottom Plug for the Galataport Project
    The Multi-Purpose Bottom Plug for the Galataport Project Salvatore Miranda, Technical Manager, TREVI Turkey, Istanbul (Turkey); email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The paper describes an innovative geotechnical engineering solution that was provided by TREVI for the renovation project at Galataport in Istanbul, Turkey. Among other interesting geotechnical works included in the project, this paper also presents the design considerations and construction of the multi-purpose bottom plug (MPBP). This original geotechnical engineering solution was employed for a three-basement excavation in Karaköy and consists of a combination of seepage control, ground improvement, and load bearing elements, which were executed with double-fluid jet grouting, pseudo-elliptical jet grouting, and permanent micropiles, respectively. The paper describes each step of the design, execution, and the preliminary and final testing phases. Moreover, it highlights the importance of employing cutting-edge technologies used in deep foundation geo-construction and state-of-the-art electronic control devices, along with expertise, to obtain the desired results for this high-profile project. KEYWORDS: Ground improvement, Elliptical Jet Grouting, Bottom Plug, Liquefaction, Seepage Control, Micropiles. SITE LOCATION: Geo-Database INTRODUCTION The Port of Galata (or Galataport) is a passenger terminal for cruise liners, situated in the Karaköy neighbourhood of the Beyoğlu district in Istanbul, Turkey. The port has up to 1,200 m of coastline and covers an area of approximately 100,000 m2. It consists of two adjoining quays, the Karaköy (or Galata) Quay and the Salıpazarı Quay, extending from the Galata Bridge on the Golden Horn to Salıpazarı on the west coast of the Bosphorus.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Sector Report 2017
    2017 MARITIME SECTOR REPORT İSTANBUL 2018 İstanbul & Marmara, Agean, Mediterranean, Blacksea Regions TURKISH CHAMBER OF SHIPPING TURKISH CHAMBER OF SHIPPING İSTANBUL & MARMARA, AEGEAN, MEDITERRANEAN, BLACK SEA REGIONS MARITIME SECTOR REPORT 2017 İ S T A N B U L – 2018 II FOREWORD The "TURKISH SHIPPING SECTOR REPORT 2017” has been prepared within the framework of authority and responsibility granted by paragraphs No.12 and No.19 of Law No. 5174. The report covers quantitative facts and their analysis as of 31.12.2017 and is presented to our members, Turkish and foreign institutions. The Report mainly contains eight chapters: First chapter is on Turkish Merchant Fleet and its yearly developments. The fleet has been analyzed by registry, building, tonnage and age. The position of Turkish Merchant Fleet within the world fleet and among the fleets of neighboring countries has also been examined. Second chapter includes the cargoes transported by Merchant Fleet in 2017. The developments of sabotage and foreign trade cargoes, the progress of seaborne trade by flags have been explained in detail. Within this chapter, transported cargoes by types, seaborne trade to OECD countries, BSEC and EU countries have been taken into consideration. Third chapter covers the developments in shipbuilding industry and the data about Turkish shipyards, including the recent developments in the field of yacht building industry in Turkey. Fourth chapter covers Turkish Ports and the amount of cargo handled in 2017 and yearly developments. Fifth chapter includes data about the passages through the Turkish Straits and the marine traffic systems. Sixth chapter deals with marine tourism and yacht tourism in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Photographs As Evidence and Record in Istanbul
    ITU A|Z • Vol 16 No 2 • July 2019 • 91-103 Towards a critical delineation of waterfront: Aerial photographs as evidence and record in Istanbul Gökçen ERKILIÇ1 , Ipek AKPINAR2 1 [email protected] • Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey 2 [email protected] • Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey Received: December 2018 • Final Acceptance: May 2019 Abstract This paper develops a conceptual agenda and a critical cartographic methodology using aerial photographs to monitor the shaping of waterfront as a geography in Istanbul by humans. Starting from the first aerial photographs of Istanbul until present, the gaze of the vertical dimension in geographical space holds divergent evidences of spatial transformation captured in aerial views. From construction sites to building of coastal roads, demolishing of port scapes and technological rifts of logistic flows, to large infills in longshore space; events and moments of spatial deformation of coastal space become visible and evident through aerial photography. Aerial gaze, when considered within an archeology of a developing military reconnaissance technology, is presented as an ironic tool to shed light to evidences and historical record of spatial transformation within an act of witnessing. Viewing coastal unfixity through aerial photographs are argued here to provide two different temporalities: longue and court dureé which operate in the eventual and geological time. As these photographs unveil, the material - geological body of the waterfront itself becomes the bearer of historical records of human and nonhuman relations that shape the coastal geography. The ground beneath is unfixed as it is pulled into a cartographic questioning tool of “critical delineation” of Istanbul’s waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Web Gis-Based Tsunami Inundation Mapping Service; a Case Study for Marmara Sea Region
    DEVELOPMENT OF A WEB GIS-BASED TSUNAMI INUNDATION MAPPING SERVICE; A CASE STUDY FOR MARMARA SEA REGION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYKUT AYÇA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING JUNE 2012 Approval of the thesis: DEVELOPMENT OF A WEB GIS-BASED TSUNAMI INUNDATION MAPPING SERVICE; A CASE STUDY FOR MARMARA SEA REGION submitted by AYKUT AYÇA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen _____________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Güney Özcebe _____________ Head of Department, Civil Engineering Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevdet Yalçıner _____________ Supervisor, Civil Engineering Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Ayşen Egin _____________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevdet Yalçıner _____________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zuhal Akyürek _____________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Utku Kanoğlu _____________ Engineering Sciences, METU Dr. Işıkhan Güler _____________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Date: _____________ iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: AYKUT AYÇA Signature: iii ABSTRACT DEVELOPMENT OF A WEB GIS-BASED TSUNAMI INUNDATION MAPPING SERVICE; A CASE STUDY FOR MARMARA SEA REGION AYÇA, Aykut M.Sc., Civil Engineering Department Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Traffic Regulations for the Turkish Straits and the Marmara Region, Entered Into Force on 1 July 1994
    Page 1 Maritime Traffic Regulations for the Turkish Straits and the Marmara Region, entered into force on 1 July 1994 PART I PURPOSE, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose and scope Article 1 The purpose of these Regulations, which shall apply to all ships navigating in the Straits and the Sea of Marmara, is to regulate the maritime traffic scheme in order to ensure the safety of navigation, life and property and to protect the environment in the region. Definitions Article 2 For the purposes of these Regulations: (a) "Administration" means T.C. Basbakanlik Denizcilik Müstesarligi (Under-Secretariat for Maritime Affairs); (b) "The Straits and the Marmara region" means the maritime area comprising the Sea of Marmara, the Strait of Istanbul (the Bosphorus), the Strait of Canakkale (the Dardanelles) and the coastlines surrounding this area; (c) "The Straits" mean the area within the boundaries of the Strait of Istanbul and the Strait of Canakkale; (d) "Vessel" means any vehicle able to navigate at sea except craft under oars; (e) "Vessel in transit" means a vessel, the passage of which shall be innocent, continuous, expeditious and without delay. The passage through the Straits and the Marmara region shall be planned so as not to stop at any port, berth or any other place, and a notification to that effect shall have been made by the master of the vessel to the Turkish authorities before entering into the Straits; (f) "A vessel interrupting its transit passage" means a vessel the master or commander of which has notified during passage that the vessel has given up its transit passage; (g) "Vessel whose transit passage has been interrupted" means a vessel, which, due to maritime accidents such as collision and grounding, or for other reasons, is subject to investigations, legal proceedings and inquiries carried out by the Turkish administrative or legal authorities; (h) Nuclear-powered vessels or vessels carrying nuclear, noxious and dangerous goods and wastes mean: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentration Evolution of the Container Throughput in the Mediterranean Ports
    Treball de Fi de Màster Master in Supply Chain, Transport and Mobility Concentration evolution of the container throughput in the Mediterranean ports Author: Marc Morata Fernández Director: Manel Grifoll Colls Call: September 2017 ABSTRACT This report presents the analysis of the concentration evolution of the container throughput in the Mediterranean ports from 2.000 to 2.015. Nowadays, the Mediterranean region is not only a completely mature market but also one which presents a strong demand which is likely to continue growing during the following years. In order to examine the level of concentration of the container terminals, different indexes have been used. These are the Concentration Ratios (CR1, CR3 and CR10), the Gini coefficients and Lorenz curve, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and the new Geo-Economic Concentration Index (GECI). The main conclusions derived from this report are the following. Firstly, the total container throughput in the Mediterranean area during the last fifteen years has experienced an impressive growth, from 18.398.741 million TEUs in 2.000 to 46.166.931 million TEUs in 2.015. Secondly, the container throughput concentration has experienced a slight decrease during the first decade of the 2.000s (from a HHI of 0,069 in 2.000 to 0,054 in 2.015) after what it seems to have stabilised around the same values with minor fluctuations. Moreover, the gravity centre of the container traffic of the area has shift from the Western Mediterranean to the Central Mediterranean, especially due to the growth in number of total TEUs and market share of the ports of Ambarli (Turkey) and Port Said (Egypt).
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Regime of the Turkish Straits: Regulation of the Montreux Convention and Its Importance on the International Relations After the Conflict of Ukraine
    Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main The Legal Regime of the Turkish Straits: Regulation of the Montreux Convention and its Importance on the International Relations after the Conflict of Ukraine Dissertation at the Institute for Public Law in order to obtain the academic degree of Ph.D. from the Faculty of Law at Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main Submitted by Kurtuluş Yücel Supervisor Prof. Dr. Stefan Kadelbach Frankfurt am Main, 2019 First Evaluator: Prof. Dr. Stefan Kadelbach Second Evaluator: Prof. Dr. Dr. Rainer Hofmann 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.The Importance of the Straits ................................................................................................ 6 2.Major Research Question ....................................................................................................... 8 3.Thesis Overview ..................................................................................................................... 9 PART I: Historical Background of the Turkish Straits and State Practice on the Passage Regime ......................................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1 General Observations on the Turkish Straits ..................................................... 12 1.Geographical Description ..................................................................................................... 12 2. Navigation in the Straits .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Sector Report
    MARITIME SECTOR REPORT TURKISH CHAMBER OF SHIPPING ISTANBUL & MARMARA, AEGEAN, MEDITERRANEAN, BLACKSEA REGIONS MARITIME SECTOR REPORT İ S T A N B U L – 2019 FOREWORD The "TURKISH SHIPPING SECTOR REPORT 2018” has been prepared within the framework of authority and responsibility granted by paragraphs No.12 and No.19 of Law No. 5174. The report covers quantitative facts and their analysis as of 31.12.2018 and is presented to our members, Turkish and foreign institutions. The Report contains eight chapters: First chapter is about the Turkish Merchant Fleet and its yearly developments. The fleet has been analyzed with respect to registry, building, tonnage and age. The status of the Turkish Merchant Fleet within the world fleet and among the fleets of neighboring countries has also been examined. Second chapter includes the cargoes transported by the Merchant Fleet in 2018. The developments of cabotage and foreign trade cargoes, the progress of seaborne trade by flags have been explained in detail. Within this chapter, transported cargoes by types, seaborne trade to OECD countries, BSEC and EU countries have been taken into consideration. Third chapter covers the developments in the shipbuilding industry and provides data about Turkish shipyards, including the recent developments in the field of yacht building industry in Turkey. Fourth chapter covers Turkish Ports and the amount of cargo handled in 2018 and previous years. Fifth chapter includes data about the passages through the Turkish Straits and the marine traffic systems. Sixth chapter deals with marine tourism and yacht tourism in Turkey. Seventh chapter is about the fishing sector and its latest developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Making of an Ottoman Port: the Quay of Izmir in the Nineteenth Century
    The making of an Ottoman port The quay of Izmir in the nineteenth century Elena Frangakis-Syrett Queens College, City University of New York The making of an Ottoman port he quay of Izmir (Smyrna), known at the time as ‘les Quais de Smyrne’,1 Tcomprised a stone breakwater running the length of the city along the shore, two harbours and a considerable port infrastructure. It was one of the engineering feats of the nineteenth century as well as a tribute to private enterprise and capital. It was the first harbour infrastructure of its kind to be built in Ottoman Turkey and one of the earliest in the Ottoman Empire.2 In design it was similar to the ports of Brest and Toulon, built by the same French company. Dussaud Brothers3 were engineers with a first-class inter- national reputation, having undertaken the construction of a number of ports: Cherbourg and Marseilles, besides Brest and Toulon, Trieste, Algiers,4 Suez and Port Said.5 The scale and modernity of the entire project put Izmir among the foremost city ports not only in the Near East but in the Mediter- ranean as a whole. It was a fitting distinction for a city that had dominated the external and internal trade of the Ottoman Empire since the middle of the eighteenth century.6 The commercial importance of Izmir In 1889, with the harbour infrastructure in place, the British consul stationed in Izmir noted the economic dynamism of the city port: Although, officially, the district of Smyrna [Izmir] only comprises the pro- vince of Aidin [Aydin], yet virtually its commercial influence extends over the most fertile portion of Asia Minor, including the provinces of Konia [Konya] and Adalia [Antalya], and parts of Angora [Ankara], Broussa [Bursa] and Adana besides the whole of the Turkish Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • Canal Istanbul: Turkey’S Controversial Megaproject Its Likely Impacts on the Montreux Convention and Regional Stability Tuba Eldem
    NO. 43 JULY 2021 Introduction Canal Istanbul: Turkey’s Controversial Megaproject Its Likely Impacts on the Montreux Convention and Regional Stability Tuba Eldem On June 26, the Turkish government began constructing the first bridge over Canal Istanbul, the huge waterway project designed to run parallel to the Bosporus Strait. Ankara has presented the megaproject as a strategic move that will turn Turkey into a logistics base and grant it geo-political leverage over both regional and internation- al trade and transportation routes. However, Turkey’s political opposition considers Canal Istanbul to be a rent-seeking project designed to attract international – prob- ably Chinese and Arab – investment in the hope of reviving Turkey’s deteriorating economy. The Canal may also affect the Montreux Convention, the decades old treaty that governs the Turkish Straits. Given the rivalry between the US and Russia, ques- tions around the Montreux Convention will add another point of contention, increase tensions and may also present serious consequences for Turkey. On April 5, Turkish police detained 10, and presence of non-littoral states’ warships summoned four, of the 104 retired admirals in the Black Sea to 21 days. The announce- who, in an open letter, expressed their con- ment triggered an immediate reaction from cerns that Canal Istanbul would jeopardise Moscow, which labelled the move a “pro- Ankara’s existing rights over the Turkish vocative measure”. Although the US ulti- Straits as granted by the Montreux Con- mately cancelled the deployment of these vention. The detainment of the admirals warships amid rising tensions, this series coincided with Washington’s notification of events nevertheless reminded those that it would deploy two warships to the watching of both the geo-strategic impor- Black Sea amid Russia’s military build-up tance of the Turkish Straits and the critical along Ukraine’s borders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turkish Straits
    THE TURKISH STRAITS MARITIME SAFETY, LEGAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Edited by Nilüfer ORAL and Bayram ÖZTÜRK Publication No: 25 THE TURKISH STRAITS MARITIME SAFETY, LEGAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Edited by Nilüfer ORAL and Bayram ÖZTÜRK All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in a form or by any means without the prior permission from the Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV). The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are entirely those of authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV). Citation: ORAL, N and ÖZTÜRK, B. 2006. The Turkish Straits, maritime safety, legal and environmental aspects. Turkish Marine Research Foundation, İstanbul. Publication Number 25. Copyright: Türk Deniz Ara ştırmaları Vakfı (Turkish Marine Research Foundation). ISBN- 975 – 8825 – 15 – 1 Cover Picture: Cahit İST İKBAL We thank the Port Operators Association of Turkey for the contribution to the publishing of this book. The Port Operators Association of Turkey Tel: +90 216 4557102 / 03 Fax: +90 216 4556502 Web: www.turklim.org E-mail: [email protected] Türk Deniz Ara ştırmaları Vakfı (TÜDAV) Turkish Marine Research Foundation P.O. Box: 10, Beykoz / Istanbul – Turkey Tel: +90 216 424 0772 Fax: +90 216 424 0771 Web: www.tudav.org E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]