Don't Take It on Trust

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Don't Take It on Trust DON’T TAKE IT ON TRUST The case for public access to trusts’ beneficial ownership information in the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive 23 FEBRUARY 2017 Trusts provide an unparalleled degree of secrecy, making them an ideal getaway vehicle for money launderers. The European Commission’s proposed revision of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive is positive in extending the scope of ownership transparency for companies and some trusts. Yet to be effective these measures need to go further to make sure they do not allow easy escape routes for criminals. The Panama Papers shone a light on the Making beneficial ownership information abuse of corporate secrecy and led to a publicly available should be the cornerstone public outcry for government action that of the response to these challenges. The catalysed reforms around the world, creation of public registers of beneficial including the Commission’s proposals. The ownership is rapidly emerging as the new revelations demonstrated how secrecy global standard to remove that veil of facilitates money laundering, tax evasion secrecy. The UK, Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, and the financing of terrorism, with Europol Ukraine, the Netherlands, France and many identifying that over 100 names in the papers other countries have already committed to were connected with “Islamist” terrorism.1 It or have introduced public company is vital that the political momentum from the registers. Now the EU should do the same for Panama Papers is not lost and that reforms companies and trusts. meet the scale of these challenges. This briefing examines three examples of While the role of companies in facilitating how trusts are used in EU Member States financial secrecy is well documented, often which illustrate the need to strengthen the as a result of action by law enforcement or European Commission’s proposals. This other authorities, the secrecy trusts provide paper shows how: is a major hurdle to law enforcement. This A Lichtenstein trust linked to Victor means that the extent of their use is critically Yanukovych hid who benefitted from the underreported. controversial privatisation and secretive multi-million dollar renovation of Ukraine’s Investigators and prosecutors tend presidential palace. not to bring charges against trusts, because of the difficulty in proving their A Brunei prince who stole billions from his role in the crime…. As a result, even if country may have prevented an exclusive trusts holding illicit assets may well have London property from being rightfully been used in a given case, they may not returned to Brunei using a Jersey trust to actually be mentioned in formal charges hide his ownership. and court documents, and consequently European politicians have sought to use their misuse goes underreported.” trusts to keep their business interests secret World Bank Puppet Masters report on the use of 2 from their constituents and the public. legal structures in corruption cases GLOBAL WITNESS 2 DON’T TAKE IT ON TRUST FEBRUARY 2017 SUMMARY & Exemptions for disclosing the identities RECOMMENDATIONS of “minors or people otherwise incapable” should be removed, as these provide a Trusts should be included in registers loophole that could be exploited. where they have a connection to a Member State, not just when they are administered there, including where the settlor or beneficiary is resident in a Member GLOSSARY State, or where the trust owns shares in a company or property in a Member State. This Trust – a legal arrangement where an would remove a major loophole and individual, the settlor, divests assets to be significantly increase the scope of coverage. managed by a trustee, for the benefit of another individual or individuals, the Proposals for a ‘legitimate interest’ test beneficiaries. for access to beneficial ownership information do not work and should not Settlor – also known as a grantor or be included. They allow some Member trustor, establishes and transfers assets States to deny access to parties that should into a trust. have access such as journalists or NGOs, Trustee – administers and manages the create an uneven regulatory playing field and assets of the trust for the benefit of the undermine the proposal for the trusts’ beneficiaries, as set out in the interconnection of registries. terms of any trust deed. Trusts’ beneficial ownership Protector – protects the interests or information should be made public to wishes of the settlor, providing influence support the work of law enforcement, to and guidance to the trustee. Not all trusts deter money laundering, to support non-EU have a protector. countries in tackling corruption and to improve data quality. Publishing trusts’ Beneficiary – receives the benefits of the beneficial ownership information is asset held in trust, including the use of legitimate and proportional to its impacts assets held in trust, receiving an income on citizens’ right to privacy and to family life. from the trust assets, or receiving the assets at a specified date. The identities of all parties to a trust should be disclosed as beneficial owners, Beneficial owner - the individual(s) who including the settlor, trustee, protector and ultimately own or control a trust and/or beneficiary or class of beneficiaries. the individual on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted. It also Beneficial ownership should be includes individuals who exercise published as open data, in a machine- ultimate effective control over a trust. readable format without charge for accessing records, to allow systematic data analysis. GLOBAL WITNESS 3 DON’T TAKE IT ON TRUST FEBRUARY 2017 CONTENTS people in poorer countries are willing to take huge risks to flee to places such as the EU in Why trusts matter 4 search of a better life. How trusts are used to hide Corruption and money laundering are also identities and wealth 5 key facilitators of refugee smuggling and Disguising the owner of Yanukovych’s people trafficking, two of the fastest growing palace 5 and most lucrative international criminal Protecting the man who stole billions activities.4 The proceeds of these crimes can from Brunei 6 also be used to finance terrorism, with Hiding politicians’ business interests 7 terrorist groups increasingly turning to these Why all trusts connected to the EU forms of organised crime to fund their 5 need to be included 9 activities. Why trusts’ beneficial ownership Financial secrecy is a huge enabler of large- information should be made public 10 scale corruption. In a World Bank study of Public access is necessary 10 over 200 large-scale corruption cases over 30 Public access is proportionate 11 years, nearly 70% of them relied on opaque No exception for family trusts 12 corporate structures, such as trusts and ‘Legitimate interest’ does not work 13 anonymously owned companies.6 It is for this All parties identities should be made reason public registers of beneficial public 13 ownership for all EU companies must be introduced.7 Conclusion 14 Yet when individuals are trying to create WHY TRUSTS MATTER financial secrecy to hide their ownership of assets, trusts are often used as the final step The current EU Anti-Money Laundering in a complex chain of shell companies – the Directive recognises that flows of illicit ultimate entity that preserves their secrecy money can damage the integrity, stability and protects their assets. and reputation of the financial sector, threaten the internal market and Trusts provide unparalleled secrecy, 3 international development. These are very allowing individuals to disguise the real concerns. ownership of assets while still benefitting from them. This creates huge legal barriers Money laundering enables corruption that to creditors or anyone else seeking to make a deprives governments of money that could claim against these assets. These features be spent on public services like healthcare are significant additions to the simple and education. It undermines public trust in anonymity that can be achieved by setting governments and institutions – a level of up an anonymous shell company. This trust that is falling and can lead to the rise of secrecy is what makes them such effective populist movements and political instability. tools for money launderers, the corrupt and Corruption increases conflict and terrorist financers. perpetuates poverty, enriching an elite class while leaving the rest of the population behind. This contributes to a situation where GLOBAL WITNESS 4 DON’T TAKE IT ON TRUST FEBRUARY 2017 DISGUISING THE OWNER OF Trusts often constitute the final YANUKOVYCH’S PALACE layer of anonymity for those seeking to The Mezhyhirya mansion and estate, former conceal their identity.” President Victor Yanukovych’s home for over OECD - Behind the Corporate Veil8 a decade, has become a symbol of endemic One rationale provided for the secrecy that corruption in Ukraine. By the time trusts enjoy is that they exist to hold and Yanukovych fled Ukraine after the 2014 distribute assets to third parties, such as revolution, the estate included a 5-story children or vulnerable people. Yet as this palace, two 3-story guest houses, a golf paper demonstrates, all too often trusts can course, a yacht club, a helicopter pad and a simply be elaborate structures for the benefit racetrack with horse stables.9 of the individuals establishing them. Yanukovych is currently wanted in Ukraine to HOW TRUSTS ARE USED TO face accusations of having cost the country up to $100 billion, including allegedly taking HIDE IDENTITIES AND WEALTH $32 billion out of the country in truckloads of The degree of secrecy provided by trusts cash during his final days in power, means that there are very few examples in allegations which he denies.10 In comparison, the public domain that show how trusts are at that time Ukraine’s external debt was used to hide identities and wealth, despite it $131 billion.11 being widely recognised that trusts are frequently used to do this.
Recommended publications
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University
    Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (WPEL) Volume 25 Number 1 Spring 2010 Article 5 Spring 2010 Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University Bridget A. Goodman University of Pennsylvania Nina A. Lyulkun Khmel'nyts'kyi National University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel Part of the Education Commons, and the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Goodman, B. A., & Lyulkun, N. A. (2010). Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University. 25 (1), Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol25/iss1/5 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol25/iss1/5 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University This article is available in Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (WPEL): https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/ vol25/iss1/5 Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukrainian University1 Bridget A. Goodman University of Pennsylvania Nina A. Lyulkun Khmel’nyts’kyi National University This article presents results of an exploratory survey conducted at a central- western Ukrainian university of students’ current usage of and attitudes towards Ukrainian, Russian, and English. Before 1989, Soviet language policy positioned Russian over Ukrainian as the language of power and as the sole language of higher education. The effectiveness of national policies in post-Soviet Ukraine aimed at affirmative action for the Ukrainian language has been debatable and constrained by geographical factors of language use and language policy. The po- litical and economic status of English has the potential to impact the position of both Ukrainian and Russian in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrians Put Brakes on New Ukraine Investment
    8 Business April 22, 2016 www.kyivpost.com Editor’s Note: World in Ukraine takes a look at Ukraine’s bilateral relations with different nations. To sponsor this news feature, please contact the Kyiv World in Ukraine Post’s sales team at [email protected] or call 591-7788. In partnership with FREYWILLE Austrians put brakes on new Ukraine investment BY YULIANA ROMANYSHYN [email protected] Austria, with its historically deep ties to Ukraine, is one of the coun- try’s most important sources of investment. But Ukraine’s economic crisis, unstable politics and the phantom cease-fire in the eastern Donbas have put fresh Austrian investment – which stands cumulatively at $2.4 billion – on hold for the most part. But even so, Austria remains Ukraine’s fifth biggest investor after Cyprus, the Netherlands, Germany and Russia. Moreover, some companies are even reporting growth. Insurance doing fine There are 43 subsidiary enterprises of Austrian companies in Ukraine. But no new Austrian businesses have entered Ukraine over the past two years, according to Ukrainian- based Austrian business consultant Rainer R. Staltner. The largest Austrian enterprises in Ukraine operate in the bank- ing and insurance sectors, with Raiffeisen Bank Aval and Vienna Insurance Group being the most high profile. Represented in 24 countries, Vienna Insurance Group has found- A participant practices during Red Bull’s Vienna Air King dirt jumping competition event held in Vienna on April 6, 2013. (AFP) Austria at a glance Total area: 83,871 square kilome- ters ed four insurance companies in Population: 8.534 million Ukraine: the Ukrainian Insurance Government type: parliamentary Group, Kniazha, Globus and Jupiter.
    [Show full text]
  • Tymoshenko Tells US That Ukraine Is In
    INSIDE: • U.S. ambassadors receive honors from Ukraine — page 3. • More on Yulia Tymoshenko’s U.S. visit — pages 4-7. • Music in North America, contemporary art in Kyiv — centerfold. HE KRAINIAN EEKLY T PublishedU by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profitW association Vol. LXXV No. 10 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MARCH 11, 2007 $1/$2 in Ukraine Foreign policy objectives Tymoshenko tells U.S. that Ukraine remain frozen in Ukraine is in “deep constitutional crisis” by Zenon Zawada Russia’s Black Sea Fleet Kyiv Press Bureau The MARS-75 radio-navigation sta- KYIV – Though the Ukrainian winter tion is the latest in repeated refusals by was unusually mild, the country’s foreign the Russian Federation to adhere to policy remained largely frozen in recent Ukrainian court orders requiring that its months, characterized by ongoing government transfer Black Sea Fleet Russian interference and Ukraine’s mini- property to the Ukrainian government. mal progress Westward. Last year, the Sevastopol Economic Russian soldiers on March 5 refused to Court ordered the Russian Federation to allow Ukrainian government officials to transfer control of 77 lighthouses and enter the MARS-75 navigation station in navigational sites to Ukraine’s Ministry the Kherson Oblast in order to deliver a of Defense. Russia never compiled. court order that the soldiers withdraw, in At the MARS-75 station in Henichesk, adherence with Ukrainian law. Russian soldiers are violating the Black Meanwhile, in Brussels, European Sea Fleet arrangement with their pres- leaders continued to keep Kyiv at arm’s ence on Ukrainian territory 200 kilome- length, stressing the need for Ukraine to ters away from their Sevastopol base, join the World Trade Organization, estab- said Oleh Yatsenko, leader of the Student lish a free trade zone and engage in fur- Brotherhood (Studentske Bratstvo).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Fix Ukraine's Broken Legal System
    June 26, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 2 How To Fix Ukraine’s Broken Legal System Editors’ Note Contents If it ain't broke, don't fi x it. But if it is broke, as Ukraine's criminal justice system is, how to 4 Is it time to scrap Ukraine’s fi x it? Does society start from scratch or simply focus on a few areas at a time? These are legal system and start over with the questions that Ukrainians are still wrestling with, nearly 24 years after the collapse of the another nation’s system? Soviet Union The U.S.S.R.'s half-life is proving to be way too long, and the legal system pro- 6 Armine Sahakyan: Judicial reform vides one of the best examples of how much damage was infl icted during those 70 years. is still a pipe dream in former Basic legal concepts are either not appreciated or in force here. Soviet Union Probable cause – It still feels like a society where police can take people away in the dead of night on any pretext. 8 Soviet social guarantees for Presumption of innocence until proven guilty – Suspects can be subject to damning pre-tri- employees scare investors, often backfi re al publicity. Putting defendants in courtroom cages announces to the world: This is a guilty person. Lengthy pre-trial detention assumes guilt and ruins lives. 10 Anders Aslund: How to reform Plea bargains – These come in handy in getting lower-level suspects to turn state's evidence prosecutors and judicial system against top-level suspects, in murders and in fi nancial crimes, and also in ensuring justice is done without lengthy and costly trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Offset
    SEPTEMBER 2020 NATALIYA BUGAYOVA PUTIN’S OFFSET THE KREMLIN’S GEOPOLITICAL ADAPTATIONS SINCE 2014 MILITARY LEARNING AND THE FUTURE OF WAR SERIES Nataliya Bugayova, Institute for the Study of War PUTIN’S OFFSET THE KREMLIN’S GEOPOLITICAL ADAPTATIONS SINCE 2014 MILITARY LEARNING AND THE FUTURE OF WAR SERIES Cover: Russia's President Vladimir Putin, Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev and Belarus' President Alexander Lukashenko stand before posing for a group photo during the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) summit at the Kremlin in Moscow May 15, 2012. REUTERS/ Denis Sinyakov All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing or from the publisher. ©2020 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2020 in the United States of America by the Institute for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 | Washington, DC 20036 understandingwar.org ABOUT THE AUTHOR Nataliya Bugayova is a non-resident National Security Research Fellow at the Institute for the Study of War’s (ISW). She led ISW's Russia and Ukraine research team from 2019-2020 and has been ISW’s Russia Research Fellow since 2018. Her work focuses on the Kremlin’s foreign policy decision-making, information opera- tions, and ongoing global campaigns - including in the former Soviet Union and Africa. She is the author of “How We Got Here with Russia: The Kremlin’s Worldview.” Her written work and inter- views have been featured in media outlets including The Hill, BBC, VOA, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Politics: the Use of the Holodomor As a Political And
    Memory Politics: The Use of the Holodomor as a Political and Nationalistic Tool in Ukraine By Jennifer Boryk Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Advisor: Professor Maria Kovacs Budapest, Hungary 2011 CEU eTD Collection Abstract This thesis serves as an analysis of the construction and use of the Holodomor as the defining cornerstone of Ukrainian national identity, and the creation of a victim narrative through this identity. The thesis addresses the steps taken by Viktor Yushchenko in Ukraine to promote this identity, constructed in the diaspora, by seeking the recognition of the Holodomor as genocide by Ukraine‘s population, as well as the international community. The thesis also discusses the divergent views of history and culture in Ukraine and how these differences hindered of acceptance of Viktor Yushchenko‘s Holodomor policies. CEU eTD Collection Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 The Trials of Nation Building ............................................................................................................... 3 Chapter One: The National Identity Formula ...................................................................................... 10 1.1 Creation of a Collective Narrative ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Money, Influence, Corruption and Capture: Can Democracy Be Protected? Exploring Democracy’S Resilience
    Chapter 2 The Global State of Democracy 2017 Exploring Democracy’s Resilience Chapter Money, influence, corruption 5and capture: can democracy be protected? © 2017 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance This is an extract from: The Global State of Democracy: Exploring Democracy's Resilience International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The maps presented in this publication do not imply on the part of the Institute any judgement on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of such boundaries, nor does the placement or size of any country or territory reflect the political view of the Institute. The maps have been created for this publication in order to add clarity to the text. References to the names of countries and regions in this publication do not represent the official position of International IDEA with regard to the legal status or policy of the entities mentioned. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: International IDEA Strömsborg SE-103 34 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN Tel: +46 8 698 37 00 Email: [email protected] International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. This publication has received support from International IDEA’s Member States through the Institute’s core funding. Grateful acknowledgement is made to the governments of Sweden and Norway, whose generous support made this publication possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper David Schneider B.A., University of Colorado, 2018 M.A., University of Colorado, 2018
    Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper David Schneider B.A., University of Colorado, 2018 M.A., University of Colorado, 2018 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Russian 2018 i This thesis entitled: Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper Schneider has been approved for the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Professor Laura Osterman Professor John O’Loughlin Professor Artemi Romanov Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Abstract Schneider, Jasper David (M.A., Russian Department of the University of Colorado) Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine Thesis directed by Associate Professor Laura Osterman This paper closely examines trends surrounding Ukrainian nationalism following the events of the Maidan Revolution, and applies modernist nationalist thinking, including Benedict Anderson's theory of Imagined Communities and Anthony Smith’s theory of Ethno-Symbolism, to explain how the Ukrainian Nation is fundamentally changing at a core level. Anderson’s theory states that modern nations are defined by perceived shared connections between each individual member of a nation, and that these connections are often dictated by language, religion and other cultural icons. The Ukrainian nation has been under the control of Russia and the USSR for the better part of the last 1,000 years, and as a result what defines the Ukrainian nation in modern times is controversial even amongst Ukrainians.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents About OCCRP... ........................4 Developing the Next Generation: The Russian Language Media Network ....50 Our Mission ...........................5 Recognition .......................... 51 The Vision ............................6 Our International Media Member Centres ......................8 Partners in 2017 ......................58 Meet our Global Editors ............... 12 Board of Directors ....................60 OCCRP in Numbers ..................22 Rising Threats ........................64 A Year of Impact .....................27 We Were There: 2017 Global Investigative Accelerating Impact: The Global Anti- Journalism Conference ...............66 Corruption Consortium ...............44 Combined Financial Statements .......71 The Investigative Dashboard .........46 Our Donors ..........................76 OCCRP Data .........................48 3 About OCCRP Founded in 2006 by Drew Sullivan and Paul worldwide. With more than 80 cross- Radu, the Organized Crime and Corruption border stories reaching more than 200 Reporting Project (OCCRP) is a non-profit million readers and viewers annually, media organization that provides an OCCRP has quietly become the world’s investigative reporting platform for the most prolific investigative reporting OCCRP Network. OCCRP now connects organization. Our websites inform more 45 non-profit investigative centers in than 6 million readers and viewers monthly, 34 countries, scores of journalists and reaching an additional 200 million readers several major
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Photo by Spenser Hans, Unsplash.Com, Covered Under CC License
    ORGANIZED CRIME AND CORRUPTION REPORTING PROJECT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Photo by Spenser Hans, Unsplash.com, covered under CC License “Many news networks are cartoonish parodies of their former selves, individual billionaires appear to have taken up newspaper ownership as a hobby, limiting coverage of serious matters concerning the wealthy, and serious investigative journalists lack funding.” —’John Doe’, anonymous source of the Panama Papers 2 Amman, Jordan Moscow, Russia Bogota, Colombia Riga, Latvia Bucharest, Romania Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Johannesburg, South Africa Tbilisi, Georgia Kyiv, Ukraine Washington DC, USA Table of Contents Vision of the Future . 4 Who We Are . 6 Board of Directors . 8 Why We Need Investigative Reporting . 10 Our Stories: Highlights from 2016 . 12 2016 Was a Turning Point for OCCRP . 17 Gauging The Impact . 4 OCCRP Tech Team: Digitizing a Revolution . 24 Fact-Checking: Writing Stories Based on Solid Evidence . 30 Awards . 31 OCCRP’s International Media Partners . 36 Our Growing Network . 38 Our Donors . 45 Combined Financial Statements . 46 Looking Forward . 52 3 Vision of the Future The media landscape continues to change, and everyone is struggling to keep up . That’s why, at OCCRP, we’re deter- mined to stay on the cutting edge -- and this year is no dif- ferent . The unique model we’ve developed allows regional re- porters who know their countries better than anyone to come to us and get the editors, programmers, researchers, and re- sources they need to do great cross-border investigations . Think of us as the Uber or AirBnB of journalism – we don’t have our own reporters, but we’ve built the infrastructure that lets them reach new heights .
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution and Reform in Ukraine EVALUATING FOUR YEARS of REFORM
    ITRevolution DOES and Reform NOT in Ukraine MATTEREvaluating Four Years of Reform HOW SLOWBy Silviya Nitsova, Grigore Pop-Eleches, YOU and Graeme RobertsonGO LNG AS YOU DON'T STOP PONARS Eurasia July 2018 Revolution and Reform in Ukraine EVALUATING FOUR YEARS OF REFORM JULY 2018 Silviya Nitsova University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Grigore Pop-Eleches Princeton University Graeme Robertson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill PONARS Eurasia is an international network of scholars advancing new approaches to research on security, politics, economics, and society in Russia and Eurasia. PONARS Eurasia is based at the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) at the George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. This publication was made possible in part by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. Program Directors: Henry E. Hale and Marlene Laruelle Managing Editor: Alexander Schmemann Senior Research Associate: Sufian Zhemukhov Program Associate: William McHenry PONARS Eurasia Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) Elliott School of International Affairs The George Washington University 1957 E Street NW, Suite 412 Washington, DC 20052 Tel: (202) 994-6340 www.ponarseurasia.org Cover image: Shutterstock/Vadven 393132940 © PONARS Eurasia 2018. All rights reserved Executive Summary In February 2014, Ukraine grabbed the world’s attention with its second revolution in a decade. The corrupt and increasingly authoritarian administration of President Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown. After the revolution, Ukraine embarked upon a wide- ranging series of economic and governance reforms. In this volume, we assess the progress of these reforms and analyze the main factors that explain the successes and failures we see.
    [Show full text]