DOCSLIB.ORG

FACULTY of HUMANITIES Research Profile and Publications 2011-2014 University House ”Anastasios G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FACULTY of HUMANITIES Research Profile and Publications 2011-2014 University House ”Anastasios G RESEARCH at the University of Cyprus FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Research Profile and Publications 2011-2014 University House ”Anastasios G. Leventis” 1 University Avenue • 2109 Aglantzia P.O.Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus Tel.: (+357) 22894000 E-mail: [email protected] This edition was produced by the Publications Office, International Relations Sector of the International Relations Service of the University of Cyprus, under the supervision of the University’s Research Committee and the Vice-Rector of Academic Affairs, Professor Athanasios Gagatsis, who chairs the Committee. EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Gregory Makrides Director of International Relations Service GENERAL EDITOR Elena Avgoustidou-Kyriacou Senior University Officer, International Relations Sector, International Relations Service COORDINATING EDITOR Chrysanthi Loizidou University Officer, Publications Office, International Relations Sector, International Relations Service DESIGN / LAYOUT Popi Palma Constantinou Publications Office, International Relations Sector, International Relations Service ISSN 1450-0574 Copyright©2016 • University of Cyprus RESEARCH PROFILE AND PUBLICATIONS 2011-2014 FACULTY OF HUMANITIES CONTENTS Introduction 5 Message from the Dean 7 Department of English Studies 9 Department of French and European Studies 35 Department of Turkish and Middle Eastern Studies 57 Appendices 74 Doctoral Titles Awarded 75 Abbreviations 76 Academic Staff Index 77 4 INTRODUCTION This publication lists the research activity of the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Cyprus undertaken in the years 2011-2014. It presents information on each member of the Faculty’s academic staff who is directly or indirectly related to research, such as membership in professional societies, international organisations or editorial boards, and participation in research programmes. The internal research programmes listed in this publication have been approved by the Senate of the University of Cyprus. Publications make up a sizeable part of the information provided and only published books, chapters in books and articles are included, while publications ‘’in press’’ or ‘’forthcoming’’ are not. The number of journal publications and conference proceedings is limited to a selection of best ten publications by each member of the academic staff. Members of the academic staff are listed in alphabetical order within departments and the information outlined in all research profiles is based on electronic data received directly from members of the academic staff. The book contains three appendices: • Appendix I lists all the doctoral titles awarded by the Faculty of Humanities and Education in alphabetical order within the period 2011-2014. • Appendix II presents a list of abbreviated terms listed in this publication. • Appendix III lists an index of the academic staff of the Faculty of Humanities and in alphabetical order by surname. The publication is available on the website of the University of Cyprus www.ucy.ac.cy/publications-en 5 6 MESSAGE FROM THE DEAN The Faculty of Humanities comprises academic disciplines that seek to advance our understanding of the world in which we live by interpreting the human experience, from individuals to entire cultures. We are interested in raising questions rather than providing absolute answers. Through our emphasis on reflection and critical thinking, the Faculty’s aim is to contribute to the University’s development of its role as an educational and research institution, in close dialogue with society and culture. We attract research funding from a broad base of sources to support our long- term research ambitions. Our academic staff have led numerous externally funded research projects including the Research Promotion Foundation, EU-Lifelong Learning Programmes, internal programmes and selected COST Actions. Across our departments of English Studies, French and European Studies, Turkish and Middle Eastern Studies and the Language Centre, our staff publish articles in leading international academic journals, author and edit well-received academic books, and participate in conferences and other public fora for the dissemination of research findings. We also utilize our expertise to address societal challenges, by engaging with government and civil society and contributing to media debates as experts in our fields of study. By investigating matters such as literature, language, history, communication, political thought, culture, and society, we seek to enhance the research activity of the Faculty. Finally, our students have access to experts in their chosen fields of study, strengthening both the teaching and learning experience at the University of Cyprus. Anastasia Nicolopoulou Dean 7 Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Humanities Department of English Studies ACADEMIC STAFF Stella Achilleos Assistant Professor Antonis Balasopoulos Associate Professor Georg ios Floros Assistant Professor Kleanthes K. Grohmann Professor Maria Margaroni Associate Professor Anastasia Nikolopoulou Associate Professor Phoevos Panagiotidis Associate Professor Andreas Papapavlou Professor Stephanos Stephanides Professor Konstantia Tsagari Assistant Professor Evy Varsamopoulou Associate Professor 10 Department of English Studies The Department of English Studies carries out research in the three major areas reflected by the new three-track undergraduate programme: 1) Anglophone Literature and Cultural Studies 2) Theoretical and Applied Linguistics 3) Translation Studies These tracks are organized as separate sections in the Department. Faculty members actively participate in the Cyprus Society for the Study of English (CYSSE); the Linguistics Section and the Translation Studies Section are also responsible for the foundation of the Cyprus Linguistics Society (CyLing). Research activities of faculty members in the area of Anglophone Literature and Cultural Studies include theatre studies (especially the work of William Shakespeare, comparative European theatre and melodrama), comparative literature, critical and cultural theory, postcolonial and postmodern literature, 18th and 19th century fiction, continental philosophy, psychoanalysis, feminist studies, and American studies. Members of staff are also involved in the prestigious Institute for World Literature at Harvard University. Faculty members in the area of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics undertake theoretical research including generative approaches to syntax, semantics, phonology, language change and development (first and second language acquisition), i.e., biolinguistics. Applied research revolves around language contact between English and Greek in the Cypriot context (diglossia, lexical borrowing, prosodic and syntactic phenomena, etc.) as well as teaching English in primary schools and the development of language tests. Members of staff are involved in the following research projects: • The Marie Curie CIG for the CGDS Morphosyntax Project on "The Development of Cypriot Greek in Individuals with Down Syndrome: Their Morphosyntactic profile, and the effects of Phonetics and Phonology" (FP7, 2012–15) • "Adaptation of the MacArthur-Bates CDI for Cypriot Greek: Development in Toddlers" (Leventis Foundation, 2014–16, jointly with the Translation Studies Section) • The CySLI Project on "Early Identification and Assessment of Preschool Children with Specific Language Impairment in Cyprus" (RPF, 2011–12) • The CYCLIA Project on“L1 Acquisition of Cypriot Greek Pronominal Clitics” (RPF, 2010–12) • The Gen-CHILD Project on “Generative Childhood-Holistic Investigations of Language Development” (UCY, 2010–12) 11 • The BiSLI Action, COST Action IS0804 “Language Impairment in a Multilingual Society” (ESF, 2009–13) Faculty members in the area of Translation Studies undertake research in literary and drama translation, cultural translation, translation theory, translation methodology, translation didactics, text linguistics, and interpreting studies. Members of staff are involved in the following research projects: • Internal Research Project "ARGUE" (UCY, 2010–12) • EU-Lifelong Learning Programme "IVY - Interpreting in Virtual Reality" (European Commission, 2011–13) • EU-Lifelong Learning Programme "EVIVA - Evaluating the Education of Interpreters and their Clients through Virtual Learning Activities" (European Commission, 2013–14) Faculty members have participated in international conferences with more than 150 presentations and have organized over 20 international conference-related activities. Georgios Floros Chairperson 12 Research Profile and Publications 2011-2014 STELLA ACHILLEOS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR TEL.: 22892104, FAX: 22895067, E-mail: [email protected] STUDIES University of Bristol, U.K., B.A. in English with Greek Literature, 1997 University of Reading, U.K., M.A. in The English Renaissance: Politics, Patronage and Literature, 1998 University of Reading, U.K., Ph.D. in English Literature, 2002 PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES/INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS European Society for the Study of English (ESSE), Europe • Cyprus Society for the Study of English (CYSSE), Cyprus (Treasurer of the Cyprus Branch) • Renaissance Society of America (RSA), U.S.A. • Society for Renaissance Studies, U.K. • Utopian Studies Society, Europe • British Shakespeare Association, U.K. RESEARCH INTERESTS Early Modern English Literature and Culture, especially: friendship in Early Modern Literature and Culture; Community and Conviviality in Early Modern Literature and Culture
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historia Scribere 13 (2021)
    historia scribere 13 (2021) The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments Vera Flatz Kerngebiet: Neuzeit eingereicht bei: Yasir Yilmaz, MA PhD und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Ehrenpreis eingereicht im: WiSe 2019/20 Rubrik: Seminar-Arbeit Abstract The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments The following seminar paper deals with Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and the processes that turned an Ottoman principality into the Ottoman Empire. Starting with Sultan Mehmed’s II appointment in 1444, important practic- es such as the nomination of a grand vizier changed significantly. Moreover, Mehmed II built a new palace which reflected the new imperial self-percep- tion, a new code of law was installed, and the empire was centralised. All these developments become especially visible in the life of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha Angelovic. The paper examines secondary literature as well as contem- porary sources of Kritobolous and Ibn Khaldun. Sources on Mahmud Pasha’s life are rare and need to be analysed with caution as his posthumous legend influenced the production of literature about his life. 1. Introduction Mahmud Pasha Angelovic, born at the beginning of the 15th century in a town in Ser- bia, became one of the most influential grand viziers of the Ottoman Empire. How did that happen? In 1453, Mehmed II conquered Constantinople and made it the capital of one of the biggest empires of the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • 5989 Turcica 35 09 Reindl
    Hedda REINDL-KIEL 247 THE TRAGEDY OF POWER THE FATE OF GRAND VEZIRS ACCORDING TO THE MENAKIBNAME-I MAHMUD PA≤A-I VELI bhorrence of tyranny and bloodthirsty despotism is, according to A 1 Joseph von Hammer , a prominent leitmotiv in the anonymous Mena- kıbname-i Mahmud Pa≥a. Hammer remarks, though, that its text cannot serve as a historical source, but is rather a kind of coffeehouse literature (lowbrow narratives presented by a story teller). Following this verdict, scholars did not show any particular interest in the menakıb for a lengthy period, although the text was printed in Turkey in the second half of the 19th century2. In 1854 an edition (using the manuscript Dresden Cod. turc. 181 and one of the Berlin manuscripts) with a French translation appeared in Friedrich Heinrich Dieterici's Chrestomatie Ottomane3, but this served largely didactic purposes. Thus, the view of scholars did not change, and Franz Babinger remarked as late as 1927 in his Geschichts- schreiber der Osmanen that the menakıb were of no historical value4. In 1949, Halil Inalcık and Mevlûd Oguz introduced a newly-found “∞gazavat-ı Sultan Murad∞”, which contained at the end an incomplete Dr. Hedda REINDL-KIEL Seminar für Orientalische Sprachen, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Nassestr. 2 D-53113 Bonn, Germany. 1 Joseph von HAMMER, Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches, vol. IX, Pest 1833 (reprint∞: Graz 1963), p. 238, no 116. 2 Niyazi Ahmed BANOGLU, Mahmud Pa≥a∞—∞Hayatı ve ≤ehadeti∞—(Camilerimiz ve Bâniler), Istanbul, 1970 (Gür Kitapevi), p. 8. 3 Berlin, p. 1-18 (Ottoman text), 63-81 (French translation).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — a History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — A History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A. Howard Index More Information Index “Bold text denotes reference to figure” Abbas (Shah), 121, 140, 148 Abu Ayyub al-Ansari, tomb of, 70, 90–91 Abbas Hilmi (Khedive), 311 Abu Hanifa, 114 Abbasids, 3, 27, 45, 92, 124, 149 tomb restored, 92 scholars, on end of the world, 53 Abu Taqiyya family, of Cairo, 155 Abd al-Kader al-Gilani, 92, 316 Abu’l-Ghazi Bahadur Khan, of Khiva, 265 Abdülaziz (Sultan), 227, 245, 247, 257–58, Abyssinia, 94 289 Aceh (Sumatra), 203 deposed, 270 Acre, 214, 233, 247 suicide of, 270, 280 Adana, 141, 287, 307 tour of Europe, 264, 266 and rail lines, 287, 307 Abdülhamid I (Sultan), 181, 222, 230–31 French occupation of, 309 Abdülhamid II (Sultan), 227, 270, 278–80, headquarters of Ibrahim at, 247 283–84, 296 in census, 282 and Armenian question, 292 massacre of Armenians in, 296–97 and census, 280 on hajj route, 201, 203 and Macedonian question, 294 Adana, 297 and public ritual, 287 Adana, province of concessions to revolutionaries, 295 cotton boom in, 286–87 deposed, 296 Aden educational reforms of, 287–88 Ottoman conquest of, 105 memoirs about, 280 Admiral of the Fleet, See Kapudan Pasha opposition to, 292–93 Adnan Abdülhak, 319 repression by, 292 Adrianople. See Edirne security apparatus of, 280 Adriatic Sea, 19, 74–76, 111, 155, 174, 186, 234 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 200, 288, 290 and Afro-Eurasian commerce, 74 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 10, 56, 200, Advice for kings genre, 71, 124–25, 150, 262 244 Aegean archipelago
    [Show full text]
  • The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries
    The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries By Hasan Karatas A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Hamid Algar, Chair Professor Leslie Peirce Professor Beshara Doumani Professor Wali Ahmadi Spring 2011 The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries ©2011 by Hasan Karatas Abstract The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries by Hasan Karatas Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Hamid Algar, Chair This dissertation argues for the historical agency of the North Anatolian city of Amasya through an analysis of the social and political history of Islamic mysticism in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries Ottoman Empire. The story of the transmission of the Halvetiye Sufi order from geographical and political margins to the imperial center in both ideological and physical sense underlines Amasya’s contribution to the making of the socio-religious scene of the Ottoman capital at its formative stages. The city exerted its agency as it urbanized, “Ottomanized” and catapulted marginalized Halvetiye Sufi order to Istanbul where the Ottoman socio-religious fabric was in the making. This study constitutes one of the first broad-ranging histories of an Ottoman Sufi order, as a social group shaped by regional networks of politics and patronage in the formative fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Introducing the Ottoman Empire 49 4 Scholars in Mehmed II’S Nascent Imperial Bureaucracy (1453–1481) 59 5 Scholar-Bureaucrats Realize Their Power (1481–1530) 83
    Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire During the early Ottoman period (1300–1453), scholars in the empire carefully kept their distance from the ruling class. This changed with the capture of Constantinople. From 1453 to 1600, the Ottoman government coopted large groups of scholars, usually more than a thousand at a time, and employed them in a hierarchical bureaucracy to fulfill educational, legal, and administrative tasks. Abdurrahman Atçıl explores the factors that brought about this gradual transformation of scholars into scholar- bureaucrats, including the deliberate legal, bureaucratic, and architectural actions of the Ottoman sultans and their representatives, scholars’ own participation in shaping the rules governing their status and careers, and domestic and international events beyond the control of either group. abdurrahman atçıl is Assistant Professor and a fellow of the Brain Circulation Scheme, co-funded by the European Research Council and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, at IstanbulSehir ¸ University. He also holds an assistant professorship in Arabic and Islamic studies at Queens College, City University of New York. Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. Cambridge University Library, on 13 Feb 2017 at 10:56:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819326 Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. Cambridge University Library, on 13 Feb 2017 at 10:56:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819326 Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire abdurrahman atçıl Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core.
    [Show full text]
  • Patricia Wealth Death and Power
    Wealth, Power and Death Capital Accumulation and Imperial Seizures In the Ottoman Empire (1453-1839) Ali Yaycıoğlu1 Kim kul olurdı ri‘ayet olmasa Söz tutulmazdı siyaset olmasa [Who would be sultan’s slave, if there was no subjugation, His words wouldn’t be obeyed, if there was no execution.] Asafi Dal Mehmed Çelebi Șeca‘atname (1586) Mal canın yongasıdır. [Property is a piece of the soul.] Turkish proverb Introduction It is a well known, but oddly very little studied phenomenon that from the mid-15th century, when the Ottoman imperial enterprise was consolidated with the conquest of Constantinople under Mehmed II (the Conqueror) (r. 1451-81), to the decree of Tanzimat in 1839, thousands of individuals, who acted as offices-holders or contractors of the Ottoman state, were executed without any judicial inquiry, solely with the decrees of the sultans or imperial grandees acting on their behalf. As dramatically, the properties of thousands of individuals and families, who performed as office-holders or contractors, were confiscated either after their executions or their natural deaths, without any legal justification. In Ottoman political and economic culture, such extra-inquisitory imperial executions and confiscations without due process were considered as two main components of the 1 Assistant Professor of History, Stanford University. 450 Serra Mall, Building 200, Stanford, CA 94305. Email Address: [email protected] This is a very early stage of an ongoing project. Please do not circulate without permission. 1 Ottoman imperial order. Although it was never formulated in full clarity into constitutional language, according to imperial custom and law those individuals, whose status and wealth came from the sultan, state, and/or public (miri), were to be regarded as stripped of their private rights, and their life and property were to be under the absolute jurisdiction of the sovereign sultan.
    [Show full text]
  • Government, Administration and Law Colin Imber
    7 Government, administration and law Colin Imber The functions of Ottoman government were, in essence, to raise revenue with which to support the sultan’s army and court, to conduct war and rela- tions with foreign powers, to uphold law and order, and to support what the ruling elite regarded as the right religion. Most day-to-day public functions – for example, the construction and maintenance of mosques, education, wel- fare of the poor, the provision of a water supply in towns and the upkeep of bridges and cemeteries – were the responsibility of vakıf s (endowments of land or other sources of income used for the charitable purpose dei ned by the founder), established through the private benei cence of individuals. The founders of the greatest vakıf s were, it is true, the sultans and their ministers, and their foundations – notably the imperial mosques in Istanbul – served to project the grandeur and munii cence of the dynasty. Nonetheless, they were legally autonomous institutions and, strictly speaking, outside the realm of government. The scope of Ottoman government was therefore limited but in this respect no dif erent from the governments of other pre-modern states. Furthermore, while the problems which the Ottoman government faced between 1453 and 1603 may have grown in scale and complexity, the basic functions of government remained unchanged. Equally, the institutions and oi ces that were in place during the reign of Mehmed II (r. 1451–81) were still in place and, in appearance, largely unchanged in the reign of his descen- dant Mehmed III (r. 1595–1603 ).
    [Show full text]
  • ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ و ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ، ﺳﺎل ﭼﻬﻞ و ﺷﺸﻢ، ﺷﻤﺎرة ﭘﯿﺎﭘﯽ 93، ﭘﺎﯾﯿﺰ و زﻣﺴﺘﺎن 1393، ص 33-65
    ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت اﺳﻼﻣﯽ: ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ و ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ، ﺳﺎل ﭼﻬﻞ و ﺷﺸﻢ، ﺷﻤﺎرة ﭘﯿﺎﭘﯽ 93، ﭘﺎﯾﯿﺰ و زﻣﺴﺘﺎن 1393، ص 33-65 ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺪارس و اﺳﻼم ﻣﺪرﺳﯽ در ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﯽ دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ * ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻮردي دوره ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮي ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﯾﺎن دوره ﻣﺮاد اول دﮐﺘﺮ ﻣﻬﺪي ﻋﺒﺎدي/ اﺳﺘﺎدﯾﺎر داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﭘﯿﺎم ﻧﻮر ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺗﻬﺮان ﺟﻨﻮب1 ﭼﮑﯿﺪه ﻧﮕﺮش ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺮوا ﻣﺤﻮري در ﮔﺰارشﻫﺎي ﺗﺎرﯾﺦﻧﮕﺎري دوره ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ در ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ اراﺋﻪ ﺷﺪه از ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎت ﻣﯿﺎن دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎد ﻣﺪرﺳﻪ، دوﻟـﺖ ﻧﻬـﺎد ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔـﺬار و ﻣﺪرﺳـﻪ، ﺑـﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨـﺪ اﮐﺜـﺮ ﻧﻬﺎدﻫﺎي دﯾﮕﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ، ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﭘﺬﯾﺮ ﺟﻠﻮه داده ﺷﻮد. در ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻬﺎي ﺻﻮرت ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ دﻟﯿﻞ ﻋﺪم ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑـﻪ اﯾﻦ ﻧﮑﺘﻪ، ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﻧﮕﺎه رﺳﻤﯽ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦﻧﮕﺎري ﺳﻨﺘﯽ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺣﺎل آﻧﮑﻪ، از زﻣـﺎن ﺗﺄﺳـﯿﺲ ﻣﺪارس در ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ از اواﺳﻂ ﻧﯿﻤﻪ اول ﻗﺮن ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻫﺠﺮي/ﭼﻬﺎردﻫﻢ ﻣﯿﻼدي و ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮي ﺟﺮﯾـﺎن ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ـ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﯽ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ از آن (ﺟﺮﯾﺎن اﺳﻼم ﻣﺪرﺳﯽ) و ﺣﻀﻮر آن در ﻋﺮﺻﮥ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ، ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪرﯾﺞ ﺗﻐﯿﯿـﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﯽ در رﻓﺘﺎر و ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎي اﯾﻦ دوﻟﺖ ﭘﺪﯾﺪ آﻣﺪ. ﻓﺎرغاﻟﺘﺤﺼﯿﻼن ﻣﺪارس در ﮐﻨﺎر ﺑﺴـﻂ ﺣﻀـﻮر ﺧﻮد در ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ، ﺑﺴﯿﺎري از ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ، اداري و ﻗﻀﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﻬﻢ را ﺑـﻪ اﻧﺤﺼـﺎر ﺧـﻮد درآوردﻧـﺪ و ﺑـﺎ ﻧﻘﺶآﻓﺮﯾﻨﯽ در ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬاريﻫﺎي دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ، ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔﺬار در اﯾﻦ زﻣﯿﻨﻪ درآﻣﺪﻧﺪ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﻣﯽﺗﻮان ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻼف اﻧﮕﺎره ﻣـﺬﮐﻮر، ﺗـﺄﺛﯿﺮ دوﻟـﺖ و ﻣﺪرﺳـﻪ در دوره ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ (اواﯾﻞ دوره ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺤﺚ در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ)، دو ﺳﻮﯾﻪ ﺑﻮد و ﻧﻬﺎد ﻣﺪرﺳﻪ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﮥ ﺧـﻮد ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎر دوﻟﺖ و ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎي آن ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺳﯽ داﺷﺖ. ﮐﻠﯿﺪواژه ﻫﺎ: ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﯽ دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ، ﺟﺮﯾﺎن اﺳﻼم ﻣﺪرﺳﯽ، ﻣﺪارس، ﻋﻠﻤﺎ. *. ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ وﺻﻮل: 08/06/1393؛ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺐ ﻧﻬﺎﯾﯽ: 1394/01/18 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanli Araştirmalari the Journal of Ottoman Studies
    OSMANLI ARAŞTIRMALARI THE JOURNAL OF OTTOMAN STUDIES SAYI / ISSUE 46 • 2015 OSMANLI ARAŞTIRMALARI THE JOURNAL OF OTTOMAN STUDIES İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ OSMANLI ARAŞTIRMALARI THE JOURNAL OF OTTOMAN STUDIES Yayın Kurulu / Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık – Prof. Dr. İsmail E. Erünsal Prof. Dr. Heath Lowry – Prof. Dr. Feridun M. Emecen Prof. Dr. Ali Akyıldız – Prof. Dr. Bilgin Aydın Doç. Dr. Baki Tezcan – Doç. Dr. Seyfi Kenan İstanbul 2015 Bu dergi Arts and Humanities Citation Index – AHCI (Thomson Reuters), Turkologischer Anzeiger ve Index Islamicus tarafından taranmakta olup TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler veri tabanında yer almaktadır. Articles in this journal are indexed or abstracted in Arts and Humanities Citation Index – AHCI (Thomson Reuters), Turkologischer Anzeiger, Index Islamicus and TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Humanities Index. Baskı / Publication TDV Yayın Matbaacılık ve Ticaret İşletmesi Sipariş / Order [email protected] www.isam.com.tr Osmanlı Araştırmaları yılda iki sayı yayımlanan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir. Dergide yer alan yazıların ilmî ve fikrî sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir. The Journal of Ottoman Studies is a peer-reviewed, biannual journal. The responsibility of statements or opinions uttered in the articles is upon their authors. İcadiye Bağlarbaşı caddesi 40, Bağlarbaşı 34662 Üsküdar-İstanbul, Tel. (0216) 474 08 50 Fax (0216) 474 08 74 www.isam.org.tr [email protected] © İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi (İSAM), 2015 Osmanlı Araştırmaları / The Journal of Ottoman Studies Sayı / Issue XLVI · yıl / year 2015 Sahibi / Published under TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi ve İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi adına the auspices of Prof. Dr. Raşit Küçük - Prof. Dr. İbrahim Kâfi Dönmez Yazı İşleri Müdürü Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • VASSALS, SERVA TS a D TRAITORS: IMAGE of SERBS I POPULAR TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY by Murat Öziş Submitted to the Graduate Schoo
    VASSALS, SERVATS AD TRAITORS: IMAGE OF SERBS I POPULAR TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY by Murat Öziş Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University September 2012 ii © Murat Öziş 2012 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT VASSALS, SERVATS AD TRAITORS: IMAGE OF SERBS I POPULAR TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY Murat Öziş History, M.A. Thesis, 2012 Thesis Supervisor: Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Popular Turkish Historiography; Ottoman-Serbian History; Serbs in the Ottoman Empire; ationalism This study is established around the pre-1990 popular historiography in the Turkish Republic with a specific focus on depictions of Serbia and Serbs in the Ottoman Empire. By analyzing the events and characters from both early (i.e. the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries) and late Ottoman history, the aim is to understand how the established image(s) of ‘Serbia’ and ‘Serbs’ functions within popular Turkish historiography, a discipline which addresses a considerable portion of the society. This work, in order to achieve a comprehensive historiography survey, consists of the evaluations of the narratives of the authors with diversified political backgrounds. By doing so the thesis strives to understand the similarities and divergences among the authors and thus encourage a comparative discussion of historiography. For the comparison Western and Turkish academical works on Ottoman history, and for the theoretical framework studies regarding Turkish historiography, theories of nationalism were used. As a result, this study offers a broad, representative and yet critical reading of the Turkish historiography on the common histories of the Ottoman Empire and Serbia as well as examples and indications of anachronisms, distortions and instrumentalization of the history.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the History of Some Turkish Monuments in Thessaloniki and Their Founders
    NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF SOME TURKISH MONUMENTS IN THESSALONIKI AND THEIR FOUNDERS The first centuries of Turkish rule over Thessaloniki certainly do not belong to the best-known period of its long history. As regards the first period, before the battle of Ankara in 1402, the opin­ ions of the historians are very contradictory.1 On the other hand, the date of the definite occupation does not give any trouble. After this date, 1430, the development of the city followed an entirely different course, the conditions of which had been prepared in the fifty years before it. The intention of these pages is to give, on the basis of the activities of A number of Turkish administrators and founders and the works left by them, an enrichment of the picture of the life of that city and also to give A different explanation of some difficult problems. After the Turkish breakthrough in Macedonia in the eighties of the 14th century, which was made possible by the vacuum of power on the Balkan pen­ insula, the position of Thessaloniki became untenable. The fall of the key- fortress of Serres 2 was followed by that of the other Macedonian cities, Edessa, Kastoria, Verria, Bitola, Strumica and others. Surrounded by Turkish terri­ tory on every side, Thessaloniki capitulated only after A long siege. In accord­ ance with their tried-out methods,3 the Ottomans first set up A kind of pro­ visional government in the conquered city which was A transitional form to the definite occupation. Against this background we can explain the well-known privileges the Archbishops Isidorus and Gabriel received from the new overlord and their “generous and humane” 4 behaviour towards the citizens of the conquered 1.
    [Show full text]