DOCSLIB.ORG

2 / Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık (2-3.10.2015)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 / Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık (2-3.10.2015) Her Yıl Bir Büyük Türk Bilgi Şölenleri 2 / PROF. DR. HALİL İNALCIK Editörler: Yusuf Oğuzoğlu Selçuk Kırlı Yardımcı Editörler: İ s m a i l Y a ş a y a n l a r Gözde Kırlı Her Yıl Bir Büyük Türk Bilgi Şölenleri 2 / Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık (2-3.10.2015) Türk Ocakları Bursa Şubesi Yayınları: 6 Bilgi Şölenleri Serisi: 3 ISBN: 978-975-7739-94-4 Editörler: Yusuf Oğuzoğlu, Selçuk Kırlı Yardımcı Editörler: İsmail Yaşayanlar, Gözde Kırlı Kapak Tasarımı, Sayfa Düzeni: Gözde Kırlı © Türk Ocakları Derneği Bursa Şubesi, MART 2016 Baskıya Hazırlık : Ercüment KARTAL / [email protected] Baskı: F. Özsan Matbaacılık San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Üçevler Mh. Tanay Cad. No: 13 Nilüfer/Bursa İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ BİYOGRAFİSİNE SIĞMAYAN BİR BİLİM ADAMI: HALİL İNALCIK Mehmet KALPAKLI ..................................................................................................................1 HALİL İNALCIK’IN ESERİNDE OSMANLI DEVLETİNİN KURULUŞU MESELESİ Mehmet ÖZ ..............................................................................................................................44 HALİL İNALCIK’IN OSMANLI KURULUŞ DÖNEMİ ARAŞTIRMALARI VE TARİH YÖNTEMİ Yusuf OĞUZOĞLU .................................................................................................................50 ANNALES EKOLÜ VE HERMENÖTİK AÇIDAN PROF. DR. HALİL İNALCIK’IN TARİHÇİLİĞİ Cafer ÇİFTÇİ ............................................................................................................................71 KUZEY KARADENİZ SAHİLLERİNDE JULIEN BORDIER İLE KIRIM’DA, EVLİYA ÇELEBİ İLE AZAK’TA PROF. DR. HALİL İNALCIK’IN İZİNDE Jean-Louis BACQUÉ-GRAMMONT.......................................................................................78 ALA POURSUİTE DE PROF. DR. İNALCIK AU BORD NORD DE LA MER NOİR: EN CRİMÉE AVEC JULIEN BORDIER, EN AZOV AVEC EVLİYA ÇELEBİ Jean-Louis BACQUÉ-GRAMMONT.......................................................................................80 PROF. DR. HALİL İNALCIK VE OSMANLI TEŞKİLAT TARİHİ Mehmet İPŞİRLİ ......................................................................................................................82 KLASİK DÖNEM OSMANLI SİYASÎ TARİHİ VE HALİL İNALCIK Feridun M. EMECEN ..............................................................................................................88 TURSUN BEY’İN TÂRİH-İ EBÜ’L-FETH’I (1444-1488) VE FATİH SULTAN MEHMET DÖNEMİNE DAİR TESPİTLER Kenan İNAN ............................................................................................................................99 SADECE DEFTER-İ SANCAK-I ARVANİD’İ YAYINLAMIŞ OLSAYDI BİLE. Amy SINGER ........................................................................................................................ 110 IF HALIL INALCIK HAD MERELY PUBLISHED THE DEFTER-I SANCAK-I ARVANID. Amy SINGER ......................................................................................................................... 116 FETİH SONRASI GALATA VE BURADAKİ İTALYAN VARLIĞI Nevin ÖZKAN .......................................................................................................................122 “TARİHÇİLERİN KUTBU”, AKDENİZ, PLUS ULTRA GEÇ ORTA ÇAĞ VE YENİ ÇAĞ’DA AKDENİZ Özlem KUMRULAR ..............................................................................................................136 PROF. DR. HALİL İNALCIK’IN TARİH FELSEFESİ Mustafa ÖZTÜRK ..................................................................................................................145 TARİHSEL SOSYOLOJİ PERSPEKTİFİNDE HALİL İNALCIK Ali Yaşar SARIBAY ................................................................................................................153 OSMANLI DENİZCİLİĞİNİN MESELELERİ VE HALİL İNALCIK İdris BOSTAN ........................................................................................................................158 HALİL İNALCIK’IN KIRIM TARİHİ VE OSMANLI KUZEY SİYASETİ ARAŞTIRMALARINA KATKILARI Yücel ÖZTÜRK ......................................................................................................................164 HALİL İNALCIK’IN TANZİMAT VE BULGAR MESELESİ BAŞLIKLI DOKTORA TEZİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Ali AKYILDIZ .......................................................................................................................188 YİRMİNCİ YÜZYIL’IN EN BÜYÜK OSMANLI İMPARATORLUĞU TARİHÇİSİNİN AKLI VE ANLAYIŞI: PROFESÖR HALİL İNALCIK Rhoads MURPHEY ...............................................................................................................195 THE MIND AND MENTALITY OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY’S PREMIER HISTORIAN OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: PROFESSOR HALIL INALCIK Rhoads MURPHEY ...............................................................................................................202 TELEVİZYON BELGESELCİLİĞİMİZDE HALİL İNALCIK İLE 22 YIL Neşe SARISOY KARATAY ...................................................................................................209 OSMANLI-TÜRK EDEBİYATINI YENİDEN ANLAMAK YA DA TAŞLARI YERİNE OTURTMAK: HALİL İNALCIK’IN HAS-BAĞÇEDE ‘AYŞ U TARAB NEDÎMLER ŞÂİRLER MUTRİBLER” KİTABI ÜZERİNE Nuran TEZCAN .....................................................................................................................225 OSMANLI ÇİFT-HÂNE SİSTEMİ VE HALİL İNALCIK Tayfun ULAŞ ..........................................................................................................................241 PROF. DR. HALİL İNALCIK’IN SOSYAL VE İKTİSADİ TARİH HAKKINDA GÖRÜŞLERİ Yücel ÖZKAYA ......................................................................................................................254 ÖNSÖZ Bu kitap büyük bir abideye küçük bir selamdır. Bu selamı vermek bana nasip olduğu için çok mutluyum. Prof. Dr. Selçuk Kırlı Türk Ocakları Derneği Bursa Şubesi Başkanı Uludağ Üniversitesi Öğretim Üyesi Her Yıl Bir Büyük Türk Bilgi Şölenleri / 2. Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık BİYOGRAFİSİNE SIĞMAYAN BİR BİLİM ADAMI: HALİL İNALCIK Mehmet KALPAKLI* Halil İnalcık, yaz günlerinin bitip mevsimin sonbahara evrildiği bir Eylül gününde İstanbul-Kızıltoprak’ta doğdu. Babası Kırım’dan göçen bir ailenin ferdi Osman Nuri Bey, annesi Ayşe Bahriye Hanım’dır. Ailenin Ankara’ya taşınması ile ilk eğitimini 1923-1930 yılları arasında Ankara Gazi Mektebi’nde aldı. Orta öğrenimine Sivas Muallim Mektebi’nde başlamıştı. Ertesi yıl Ankara’ya döndü ve eğitimini Gazi Muallim Mektebi’nde tamamladı. Bir gün, coğrafya dersinde sınıflarını Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’ün ziyaret edip en ön sırada oturan küçük Halil’e önündeki haritayla ilgili sorular sormasını, her zaman göz yaşları içinde anlatmaktadır. Mezuniyetin- den sonra, Sadri Maksudi’nin tavsiyesiyle dönemin en seçkin okulu olan Balıkesir Muallim Mektebi’ne girdi. Bu okul, pek çoğu yurt dışında tahsil görmüş değerli öğretmenlere sahip bir bilim yuvası, adeta bir akademi idi. Nitekim, hocaların pek çoğu daha sonra açılacak üniversitelere hoca olarak atanmışlardır. Balıkesir’deki hocaları arasında Abdülbaki Gölpınarlı da vardı. İlk gençlik yıllarını Balıkesir’de geçirdi. 15 Eylül 1935’te mezun oldu. Yine Sadri Maksudi’nin yüreklendirmesi ve tavsiyesiyle Dil ve Tarih, Coğrafya Fakültesi’ne girmeye karar verdi. Sınavları birin- cilikle kazandı. DTCF, Atatürk’ün direktifleriyle kurulmuştu. Bünyesinde yerli ve yabancı (başta Hitler zulmünden kaçanlar olmak üzere) çok değerli bilim insanlarını barındıran eşsiz bir bilim yuvasıydı. Tarih Bölümü’nü 1940 yılında tamamladı. Fuad Köprülü, M. Göker, Yusuf Hikmet, Herbert Louis, Bekir S. Baykal gibi hocalardan dersler almıştı. Köprülü’nün tavsiyesi ile 30 Nisan 1940’ta mezun olduğu DTCF’nin Yeni Çağ Kürsüsü’ne asistan (ilmi yardımcı) olarak atandı. Faik Reşit Unat’ın yol göstermesiyle Saray Arşivi’nde bulunan Abdülhamid için derlenmiş Bulgar meselesine dair 10 ciltlik malzemeyi değerlendiren bir tezle Doktor ünvanını aldı. Yıl: 1942 idi. Tanzimat ve Bulgar Meselesi başlıklı bu tez aslında Türkiye’deki ilk ciddi sosyal-ekonomik tarih yaklaşımına sahip bilimsel çalışmadır. Halil İnalcık, bu teziyle 19. yüzyıl Balkanlar’ındaki kitlesel isyanların gerçek sebebinin eski Osmanlı sisteminden kalan ağalık rejimi ile yerli Hristiyan köylünün topraklara sahip olma mücadelesi olduğunu kanıtlıyordu. Bir yıl sonra 15 Aralık 1943’te “Viyana’dan Büyük Ricat’e Osmanlı İmparator- luğu ve Kırım Hanlığı” başlıklı teziyle Doçent oldu. Hemen akabinde askere gitti. O yıllar II. Dünya Savaşı’nın en karanlık günleriydi. Alman orduları Batı Trakya’yı işgal etmişlerdi. Neyse ki, Türkiye bu savaşa dahil olmadı. Halil İnalcık iki yıl sonra 1946 yılının başlarında terhis oldu. Askerlik hizmeti öncesinde DTCF Arapça Bölümü’nde okuyan Şevkiye Işıl ile nişanlanmıştı. Bir süre sonra evlendiler. 1948 yılında kızları Günhan doğdu. * Bilkent Üniversitesi Tarih Bölümü 1 Her Yıl Bir Büyük Türk Bilgi Şölenleri / 2. Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık 1949 yılında ihtisas için İngiltere’ye gitti. Londra’da bir buçuk yıl kaldı. Başta School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), British Museum ve British Library ve Public Record Office olmak üzere çeşitli kurumlarda bilimsel çalışmalar yaptı. Paul Wittek, Bernard Lewis, V. Menage gibi alimlerle çalıştı. Avrupa tarihi üzerine araştırmalar yaptı. O yıllarda Fernand Braudel’in Akdeniz kitabı yayınlanmıştı. Büyük yankı uyandıran bu çalışmayı okuyan Halil İnalcık, Braudel’in yaklaşımını çok beğenmiş ve Annales Okulu’nun tarih yaklaşımını benimsemiştir. Türkiye’ye dönüşünde Belleten’de bu konuda bir makale yazıp Annales Okulu’nu Türk akade- misine tanıtmıştır. Nitekim, Ömer Lütfü Barkan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historia Scribere 13 (2021)
    historia scribere 13 (2021) The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments Vera Flatz Kerngebiet: Neuzeit eingereicht bei: Yasir Yilmaz, MA PhD und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Ehrenpreis eingereicht im: WiSe 2019/20 Rubrik: Seminar-Arbeit Abstract The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments The following seminar paper deals with Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and the processes that turned an Ottoman principality into the Ottoman Empire. Starting with Sultan Mehmed’s II appointment in 1444, important practic- es such as the nomination of a grand vizier changed significantly. Moreover, Mehmed II built a new palace which reflected the new imperial self-percep- tion, a new code of law was installed, and the empire was centralised. All these developments become especially visible in the life of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha Angelovic. The paper examines secondary literature as well as contem- porary sources of Kritobolous and Ibn Khaldun. Sources on Mahmud Pasha’s life are rare and need to be analysed with caution as his posthumous legend influenced the production of literature about his life. 1. Introduction Mahmud Pasha Angelovic, born at the beginning of the 15th century in a town in Ser- bia, became one of the most influential grand viziers of the Ottoman Empire. How did that happen? In 1453, Mehmed II conquered Constantinople and made it the capital of one of the biggest empires of the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • 5989 Turcica 35 09 Reindl
    Hedda REINDL-KIEL 247 THE TRAGEDY OF POWER THE FATE OF GRAND VEZIRS ACCORDING TO THE MENAKIBNAME-I MAHMUD PA≤A-I VELI bhorrence of tyranny and bloodthirsty despotism is, according to A 1 Joseph von Hammer , a prominent leitmotiv in the anonymous Mena- kıbname-i Mahmud Pa≥a. Hammer remarks, though, that its text cannot serve as a historical source, but is rather a kind of coffeehouse literature (lowbrow narratives presented by a story teller). Following this verdict, scholars did not show any particular interest in the menakıb for a lengthy period, although the text was printed in Turkey in the second half of the 19th century2. In 1854 an edition (using the manuscript Dresden Cod. turc. 181 and one of the Berlin manuscripts) with a French translation appeared in Friedrich Heinrich Dieterici's Chrestomatie Ottomane3, but this served largely didactic purposes. Thus, the view of scholars did not change, and Franz Babinger remarked as late as 1927 in his Geschichts- schreiber der Osmanen that the menakıb were of no historical value4. In 1949, Halil Inalcık and Mevlûd Oguz introduced a newly-found “∞gazavat-ı Sultan Murad∞”, which contained at the end an incomplete Dr. Hedda REINDL-KIEL Seminar für Orientalische Sprachen, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Nassestr. 2 D-53113 Bonn, Germany. 1 Joseph von HAMMER, Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches, vol. IX, Pest 1833 (reprint∞: Graz 1963), p. 238, no 116. 2 Niyazi Ahmed BANOGLU, Mahmud Pa≥a∞—∞Hayatı ve ≤ehadeti∞—(Camilerimiz ve Bâniler), Istanbul, 1970 (Gür Kitapevi), p. 8. 3 Berlin, p. 1-18 (Ottoman text), 63-81 (French translation).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — a History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — A History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A. Howard Index More Information Index “Bold text denotes reference to figure” Abbas (Shah), 121, 140, 148 Abu Ayyub al-Ansari, tomb of, 70, 90–91 Abbas Hilmi (Khedive), 311 Abu Hanifa, 114 Abbasids, 3, 27, 45, 92, 124, 149 tomb restored, 92 scholars, on end of the world, 53 Abu Taqiyya family, of Cairo, 155 Abd al-Kader al-Gilani, 92, 316 Abu’l-Ghazi Bahadur Khan, of Khiva, 265 Abdülaziz (Sultan), 227, 245, 247, 257–58, Abyssinia, 94 289 Aceh (Sumatra), 203 deposed, 270 Acre, 214, 233, 247 suicide of, 270, 280 Adana, 141, 287, 307 tour of Europe, 264, 266 and rail lines, 287, 307 Abdülhamid I (Sultan), 181, 222, 230–31 French occupation of, 309 Abdülhamid II (Sultan), 227, 270, 278–80, headquarters of Ibrahim at, 247 283–84, 296 in census, 282 and Armenian question, 292 massacre of Armenians in, 296–97 and census, 280 on hajj route, 201, 203 and Macedonian question, 294 Adana, 297 and public ritual, 287 Adana, province of concessions to revolutionaries, 295 cotton boom in, 286–87 deposed, 296 Aden educational reforms of, 287–88 Ottoman conquest of, 105 memoirs about, 280 Admiral of the Fleet, See Kapudan Pasha opposition to, 292–93 Adnan Abdülhak, 319 repression by, 292 Adrianople. See Edirne security apparatus of, 280 Adriatic Sea, 19, 74–76, 111, 155, 174, 186, 234 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 200, 288, 290 and Afro-Eurasian commerce, 74 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 10, 56, 200, Advice for kings genre, 71, 124–25, 150, 262 244 Aegean archipelago
    [Show full text]
  • The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries
    The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries By Hasan Karatas A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Hamid Algar, Chair Professor Leslie Peirce Professor Beshara Doumani Professor Wali Ahmadi Spring 2011 The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries ©2011 by Hasan Karatas Abstract The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries by Hasan Karatas Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Hamid Algar, Chair This dissertation argues for the historical agency of the North Anatolian city of Amasya through an analysis of the social and political history of Islamic mysticism in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries Ottoman Empire. The story of the transmission of the Halvetiye Sufi order from geographical and political margins to the imperial center in both ideological and physical sense underlines Amasya’s contribution to the making of the socio-religious scene of the Ottoman capital at its formative stages. The city exerted its agency as it urbanized, “Ottomanized” and catapulted marginalized Halvetiye Sufi order to Istanbul where the Ottoman socio-religious fabric was in the making. This study constitutes one of the first broad-ranging histories of an Ottoman Sufi order, as a social group shaped by regional networks of politics and patronage in the formative fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Introducing the Ottoman Empire 49 4 Scholars in Mehmed II’S Nascent Imperial Bureaucracy (1453–1481) 59 5 Scholar-Bureaucrats Realize Their Power (1481–1530) 83
    Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire During the early Ottoman period (1300–1453), scholars in the empire carefully kept their distance from the ruling class. This changed with the capture of Constantinople. From 1453 to 1600, the Ottoman government coopted large groups of scholars, usually more than a thousand at a time, and employed them in a hierarchical bureaucracy to fulfill educational, legal, and administrative tasks. Abdurrahman Atçıl explores the factors that brought about this gradual transformation of scholars into scholar- bureaucrats, including the deliberate legal, bureaucratic, and architectural actions of the Ottoman sultans and their representatives, scholars’ own participation in shaping the rules governing their status and careers, and domestic and international events beyond the control of either group. abdurrahman atçıl is Assistant Professor and a fellow of the Brain Circulation Scheme, co-funded by the European Research Council and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, at IstanbulSehir ¸ University. He also holds an assistant professorship in Arabic and Islamic studies at Queens College, City University of New York. Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. Cambridge University Library, on 13 Feb 2017 at 10:56:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819326 Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. Cambridge University Library, on 13 Feb 2017 at 10:56:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819326 Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire abdurrahman atçıl Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core.
    [Show full text]
  • Patricia Wealth Death and Power
    Wealth, Power and Death Capital Accumulation and Imperial Seizures In the Ottoman Empire (1453-1839) Ali Yaycıoğlu1 Kim kul olurdı ri‘ayet olmasa Söz tutulmazdı siyaset olmasa [Who would be sultan’s slave, if there was no subjugation, His words wouldn’t be obeyed, if there was no execution.] Asafi Dal Mehmed Çelebi Șeca‘atname (1586) Mal canın yongasıdır. [Property is a piece of the soul.] Turkish proverb Introduction It is a well known, but oddly very little studied phenomenon that from the mid-15th century, when the Ottoman imperial enterprise was consolidated with the conquest of Constantinople under Mehmed II (the Conqueror) (r. 1451-81), to the decree of Tanzimat in 1839, thousands of individuals, who acted as offices-holders or contractors of the Ottoman state, were executed without any judicial inquiry, solely with the decrees of the sultans or imperial grandees acting on their behalf. As dramatically, the properties of thousands of individuals and families, who performed as office-holders or contractors, were confiscated either after their executions or their natural deaths, without any legal justification. In Ottoman political and economic culture, such extra-inquisitory imperial executions and confiscations without due process were considered as two main components of the 1 Assistant Professor of History, Stanford University. 450 Serra Mall, Building 200, Stanford, CA 94305. Email Address: [email protected] This is a very early stage of an ongoing project. Please do not circulate without permission. 1 Ottoman imperial order. Although it was never formulated in full clarity into constitutional language, according to imperial custom and law those individuals, whose status and wealth came from the sultan, state, and/or public (miri), were to be regarded as stripped of their private rights, and their life and property were to be under the absolute jurisdiction of the sovereign sultan.
    [Show full text]
  • Government, Administration and Law Colin Imber
    7 Government, administration and law Colin Imber The functions of Ottoman government were, in essence, to raise revenue with which to support the sultan’s army and court, to conduct war and rela- tions with foreign powers, to uphold law and order, and to support what the ruling elite regarded as the right religion. Most day-to-day public functions – for example, the construction and maintenance of mosques, education, wel- fare of the poor, the provision of a water supply in towns and the upkeep of bridges and cemeteries – were the responsibility of vakıf s (endowments of land or other sources of income used for the charitable purpose dei ned by the founder), established through the private benei cence of individuals. The founders of the greatest vakıf s were, it is true, the sultans and their ministers, and their foundations – notably the imperial mosques in Istanbul – served to project the grandeur and munii cence of the dynasty. Nonetheless, they were legally autonomous institutions and, strictly speaking, outside the realm of government. The scope of Ottoman government was therefore limited but in this respect no dif erent from the governments of other pre-modern states. Furthermore, while the problems which the Ottoman government faced between 1453 and 1603 may have grown in scale and complexity, the basic functions of government remained unchanged. Equally, the institutions and oi ces that were in place during the reign of Mehmed II (r. 1451–81) were still in place and, in appearance, largely unchanged in the reign of his descen- dant Mehmed III (r. 1595–1603 ).
    [Show full text]
  • ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ و ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ، ﺳﺎل ﭼﻬﻞ و ﺷﺸﻢ، ﺷﻤﺎرة ﭘﯿﺎﭘﯽ 93، ﭘﺎﯾﯿﺰ و زﻣﺴﺘﺎن 1393، ص 33-65
    ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت اﺳﻼﻣﯽ: ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ و ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ، ﺳﺎل ﭼﻬﻞ و ﺷﺸﻢ، ﺷﻤﺎرة ﭘﯿﺎﭘﯽ 93، ﭘﺎﯾﯿﺰ و زﻣﺴﺘﺎن 1393، ص 33-65 ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺪارس و اﺳﻼم ﻣﺪرﺳﯽ در ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﯽ دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ * ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻮردي دوره ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮي ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﯾﺎن دوره ﻣﺮاد اول دﮐﺘﺮ ﻣﻬﺪي ﻋﺒﺎدي/ اﺳﺘﺎدﯾﺎر داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﭘﯿﺎم ﻧﻮر ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺗﻬﺮان ﺟﻨﻮب1 ﭼﮑﯿﺪه ﻧﮕﺮش ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺮوا ﻣﺤﻮري در ﮔﺰارشﻫﺎي ﺗﺎرﯾﺦﻧﮕﺎري دوره ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ در ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ اراﺋﻪ ﺷﺪه از ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎت ﻣﯿﺎن دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎد ﻣﺪرﺳﻪ، دوﻟـﺖ ﻧﻬـﺎد ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔـﺬار و ﻣﺪرﺳـﻪ، ﺑـﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨـﺪ اﮐﺜـﺮ ﻧﻬﺎدﻫﺎي دﯾﮕﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ، ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﭘﺬﯾﺮ ﺟﻠﻮه داده ﺷﻮد. در ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻬﺎي ﺻﻮرت ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ دﻟﯿﻞ ﻋﺪم ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑـﻪ اﯾﻦ ﻧﮑﺘﻪ، ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﻧﮕﺎه رﺳﻤﯽ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦﻧﮕﺎري ﺳﻨﺘﯽ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺣﺎل آﻧﮑﻪ، از زﻣـﺎن ﺗﺄﺳـﯿﺲ ﻣﺪارس در ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ از اواﺳﻂ ﻧﯿﻤﻪ اول ﻗﺮن ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻫﺠﺮي/ﭼﻬﺎردﻫﻢ ﻣﯿﻼدي و ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮي ﺟﺮﯾـﺎن ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ـ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﯽ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ از آن (ﺟﺮﯾﺎن اﺳﻼم ﻣﺪرﺳﯽ) و ﺣﻀﻮر آن در ﻋﺮﺻﮥ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ، ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪرﯾﺞ ﺗﻐﯿﯿـﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﯽ در رﻓﺘﺎر و ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎي اﯾﻦ دوﻟﺖ ﭘﺪﯾﺪ آﻣﺪ. ﻓﺎرغاﻟﺘﺤﺼﯿﻼن ﻣﺪارس در ﮐﻨﺎر ﺑﺴـﻂ ﺣﻀـﻮر ﺧﻮد در ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ، ﺑﺴﯿﺎري از ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ، اداري و ﻗﻀﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﻬﻢ را ﺑـﻪ اﻧﺤﺼـﺎر ﺧـﻮد درآوردﻧـﺪ و ﺑـﺎ ﻧﻘﺶآﻓﺮﯾﻨﯽ در ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬاريﻫﺎي دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ، ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔﺬار در اﯾﻦ زﻣﯿﻨﻪ درآﻣﺪﻧﺪ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﻣﯽﺗﻮان ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻼف اﻧﮕﺎره ﻣـﺬﮐﻮر، ﺗـﺄﺛﯿﺮ دوﻟـﺖ و ﻣﺪرﺳـﻪ در دوره ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ (اواﯾﻞ دوره ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺤﺚ در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ)، دو ﺳﻮﯾﻪ ﺑﻮد و ﻧﻬﺎد ﻣﺪرﺳﻪ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﮥ ﺧـﻮد ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎر دوﻟﺖ و ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎي آن ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺳﯽ داﺷﺖ. ﮐﻠﯿﺪواژه ﻫﺎ: ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﯽ دوﻟﺖ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﯽ، ﺟﺮﯾﺎن اﺳﻼم ﻣﺪرﺳﯽ، ﻣﺪارس، ﻋﻠﻤﺎ. *. ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ وﺻﻮل: 08/06/1393؛ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺐ ﻧﻬﺎﯾﯽ: 1394/01/18 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanli Araştirmalari the Journal of Ottoman Studies
    OSMANLI ARAŞTIRMALARI THE JOURNAL OF OTTOMAN STUDIES SAYI / ISSUE 46 • 2015 OSMANLI ARAŞTIRMALARI THE JOURNAL OF OTTOMAN STUDIES İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ OSMANLI ARAŞTIRMALARI THE JOURNAL OF OTTOMAN STUDIES Yayın Kurulu / Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık – Prof. Dr. İsmail E. Erünsal Prof. Dr. Heath Lowry – Prof. Dr. Feridun M. Emecen Prof. Dr. Ali Akyıldız – Prof. Dr. Bilgin Aydın Doç. Dr. Baki Tezcan – Doç. Dr. Seyfi Kenan İstanbul 2015 Bu dergi Arts and Humanities Citation Index – AHCI (Thomson Reuters), Turkologischer Anzeiger ve Index Islamicus tarafından taranmakta olup TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler veri tabanında yer almaktadır. Articles in this journal are indexed or abstracted in Arts and Humanities Citation Index – AHCI (Thomson Reuters), Turkologischer Anzeiger, Index Islamicus and TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Humanities Index. Baskı / Publication TDV Yayın Matbaacılık ve Ticaret İşletmesi Sipariş / Order [email protected] www.isam.com.tr Osmanlı Araştırmaları yılda iki sayı yayımlanan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir. Dergide yer alan yazıların ilmî ve fikrî sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir. The Journal of Ottoman Studies is a peer-reviewed, biannual journal. The responsibility of statements or opinions uttered in the articles is upon their authors. İcadiye Bağlarbaşı caddesi 40, Bağlarbaşı 34662 Üsküdar-İstanbul, Tel. (0216) 474 08 50 Fax (0216) 474 08 74 www.isam.org.tr [email protected] © İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi (İSAM), 2015 Osmanlı Araştırmaları / The Journal of Ottoman Studies Sayı / Issue XLVI · yıl / year 2015 Sahibi / Published under TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi ve İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi adına the auspices of Prof. Dr. Raşit Küçük - Prof. Dr. İbrahim Kâfi Dönmez Yazı İşleri Müdürü Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • VASSALS, SERVA TS a D TRAITORS: IMAGE of SERBS I POPULAR TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY by Murat Öziş Submitted to the Graduate Schoo
    VASSALS, SERVATS AD TRAITORS: IMAGE OF SERBS I POPULAR TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY by Murat Öziş Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University September 2012 ii © Murat Öziş 2012 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT VASSALS, SERVATS AD TRAITORS: IMAGE OF SERBS I POPULAR TURKISH HISTORIOGRAPHY Murat Öziş History, M.A. Thesis, 2012 Thesis Supervisor: Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Popular Turkish Historiography; Ottoman-Serbian History; Serbs in the Ottoman Empire; ationalism This study is established around the pre-1990 popular historiography in the Turkish Republic with a specific focus on depictions of Serbia and Serbs in the Ottoman Empire. By analyzing the events and characters from both early (i.e. the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries) and late Ottoman history, the aim is to understand how the established image(s) of ‘Serbia’ and ‘Serbs’ functions within popular Turkish historiography, a discipline which addresses a considerable portion of the society. This work, in order to achieve a comprehensive historiography survey, consists of the evaluations of the narratives of the authors with diversified political backgrounds. By doing so the thesis strives to understand the similarities and divergences among the authors and thus encourage a comparative discussion of historiography. For the comparison Western and Turkish academical works on Ottoman history, and for the theoretical framework studies regarding Turkish historiography, theories of nationalism were used. As a result, this study offers a broad, representative and yet critical reading of the Turkish historiography on the common histories of the Ottoman Empire and Serbia as well as examples and indications of anachronisms, distortions and instrumentalization of the history.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the History of Some Turkish Monuments in Thessaloniki and Their Founders
    NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF SOME TURKISH MONUMENTS IN THESSALONIKI AND THEIR FOUNDERS The first centuries of Turkish rule over Thessaloniki certainly do not belong to the best-known period of its long history. As regards the first period, before the battle of Ankara in 1402, the opin­ ions of the historians are very contradictory.1 On the other hand, the date of the definite occupation does not give any trouble. After this date, 1430, the development of the city followed an entirely different course, the conditions of which had been prepared in the fifty years before it. The intention of these pages is to give, on the basis of the activities of A number of Turkish administrators and founders and the works left by them, an enrichment of the picture of the life of that city and also to give A different explanation of some difficult problems. After the Turkish breakthrough in Macedonia in the eighties of the 14th century, which was made possible by the vacuum of power on the Balkan pen­ insula, the position of Thessaloniki became untenable. The fall of the key- fortress of Serres 2 was followed by that of the other Macedonian cities, Edessa, Kastoria, Verria, Bitola, Strumica and others. Surrounded by Turkish terri­ tory on every side, Thessaloniki capitulated only after A long siege. In accord­ ance with their tried-out methods,3 the Ottomans first set up A kind of pro­ visional government in the conquered city which was A transitional form to the definite occupation. Against this background we can explain the well-known privileges the Archbishops Isidorus and Gabriel received from the new overlord and their “generous and humane” 4 behaviour towards the citizens of the conquered 1.
    [Show full text]