Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis Kosciuszko Bridge Project Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis September 22, 2005 New York State Department of Transportation Chapter I Introduction A. OVERVIEW Newtown Creek is a tributary of the East River in the New York Harbor and the Port of New York/New Jersey. It is considered a narrow tidal arm of the East River and forms a portion of the boundary between the Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens. The mouth of the creek is located on the east bank of the East River about 3.6 miles above The Battery. The creek extends 3.3 miles eastward and southward and has several short tributaries and basins. Newtown Creek lies in a highly industrialized area of New York City. Almost the entire water frontage is developed for terminal and industrial purposes. Traffic is moderate and consists of petroleum products, sand, gravel and stone, scrap metal, and waste management material. Vessel drafts today seldom exceed 15 feet. The mean range of tide in the creek is 4.1 feet with generally weak and variable tidal currents. B. TRIBUTARIES The tributary basins formally identified by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Ocean Service (NOS) are as follows: x Dutch Kills – on the north side of Newtown Creek, 0.8 miles from the East River; x Whale Creek – on the south side, at Mile 0.85, approximately opposite Dutch Kills; x Unnamed Canal – on the south side, at Mile 0.95, adjacent to a New York City Department of Sanitation (DSNY) facility; x Maspeth Creek – on the east side, at Mile 2.2; x East Branch – on the east side, at Mile 2.5; and x English Kills – extends eastward and southward from the East Branch entrance and forms the last 0.8 miles of Newtown Creek. C. NATURE OF SIGNIFICANT UNDERWATER OBSTRUCTIONS IN THE WATERWAY Approximately 15 pipelines, 15 submarine cables and 1 tunnel cross Newtown Creek at various locations. As stated in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Navigability Determination, these underwater structures limit the future deepening of the Federal Project Channel in those areas. Kosciuszko Bridge Project I-1 September 22, 2005 Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis Chapter I D. BRIDGES Today, Newtown Creek and its tributaries are crossed by 11 bridges, 9 movable and 2 fixed. Dutch Kills which is the first major tributary off Newtown Creek at mile 0.8, is approximately 3,120 feet long and has five bridges, four movable and one fixed bridge carrying the Long Island Expressway (LIE) with a 90 foot vertical clearance at Mean High Water (MHW). The Kosciuszko Bridge is the first fixed bridge across Newtown Creek and is 2.1 miles from the East River and, today, establishes, at 125’ above MHW, the governing vertical clearance for upstream facilities. Two movable bridges, the Pulaski Bridge and the J.J. Byrne Memorial (Greenpoint Avenue) Bridge cross Newtown Creek at mile 0.6 and 1.3, respectively. Both are located below the Kosciuszko Bridge and have horizontal clearances of 149’ and 150’, respectively, which establishes the controlling width for vessels transiting Newtown Creek below mile 3.1 for the East Branch and mile 3.4 on English Kills. (See Table 1 and Table 9 later in the report for additional bridge information.) E. NAVIGATIONAL NEEDS The following sections of this report will present the basis for past and present needs of the marine facilities that developed along the banks of Newtown Creek, how the nature of marine navigation has changed, and the anticipated future trends. These sections show how marine traffic has changed from sailing schooners and steamers to the tug and barge traffic used today, including an overall decrease in the number of vessel transits on Newtown Creek over the centuries. The report also evaluates the pilot house and mast heights of tugs used in the Tri- state area, a factor in determining an appropriate vertical clearance for any new fixed bridge. The existing 90-foot vertical clearance of the LIE fixed bridge over Dutch Kills and the proposed 90-foot vertical clearance for the Kosciuszko Bridge is shown to provide for present and future vessels with a margin of safety for weather, rough water, or vessel rolling and pitching that may occur. Kosciuszko Bridge Project I-2 September 22, 2005 Chapter II Newtown Creek History A. SEVENTEENTH CENTURY WATERWAY HISTORY Dutch explorers completed the first survey of the Newtown Creek in 1613-14, about ninety years after Giovanni de Verrazano sailed into New York Harbor. Shortly thereafter, the Dutch acquired the creek from the local Mespat tribe. The Dutch and English used the creek primarily for agriculture and fledgling industrial commerce. The creek was preserved in local lore nearly from the outset, as the infamous Captain Kidd was said to have buried treasure on a friend's waterfront property.1 Newtown Creek, and its tributaries, was a tidal estuary of the East River and fed extensive salt marshes. Native Americans used the marshes to hunt seasonal waterfowl and the tidal creeks as a link between the East River and a village site in present Maspeth. Tidal action minimized siltation in the creek, keeping the creek channels open. Dutch and English settlers continued these uses of the creek and also harvested salt hay from the marshes to feed cattle. On land adjacent to the marshes dispersed farmsteads and small agrarian villages appeared by the early 1640s. A gristmill, established around 1648, at the head of Dutch Kills above the present head of navigation, served the area into the early 19th century. Between 1645 and 1660, communities were established at Bushwick and Greenpoint in present-day Brooklyn, and Newtown and Maspeth in present-day Queens. Hunter's Point, an upland area at the mouth of Newtown Creek, remained a large undivided private landholding well into the 19th century. Upstream, the creek was a focus of border disputes among landowners and villages long after Kings and Queens counties were established in 1683, finally becoming part of the county boundary in 1768.2 During the Revolutionary War Newtown Creek and Maspeth Creek were used by the British fleet.3 After the Revolutionary War, when New York City's economy began to boom, commerce along Newtown Creek followed suit. Farms and mansions, such as John Jacob Astor's, found themselves alongside glue and tin factories, rope works, animal-carbon plants, chemical works, and the Sampson Oil Cloth factory, which was the largest of its kind at the time.4 1 Newtown Creek Alliance web page 2004 (http://www.newtowncreek.org/history) 2 Stiles 1869; W.W. Munsell & Co. 1882; Seyfried 1984; PB draft report Study and Analysis of Waterways in New York City (PB2000) 3 PB 2000 4 Newtown Creek Alliance web page 2004 Kosciuszko Bridge Project II-1 September 22, 2005 Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis Chapter II B. BRIDGES In the early to mid 19th century, virtually the only development along the channels of the Newtown Creek drainage were crossings for roads and turnpikes that linked nearby villages and led to East River ferries. A highway between Bushwick and Newtown was in place by 1670, including a wooden bridge that was most likely the first road crossing of the creek, at approximately the location of present Meeker Avenue. This crossing was replaced circa 1812- 14 by the Penny Bridge, a toll bridge on the Newtown and Bushwick Turnpike Road. The first crossing of English Kills along the present Metropolitan Avenue opened circa 1814-16 as part of the Williamsburg and Jamaica Turnpike. These remained the only bridges into the 1840s when nearby urban development stimulated more road construction across the marshy drainage. Mid- 19th century bridges included the Maspeth Avenue Plank Road to Newtown (1846), and the Greenpoint and Flushing Plank Road linking the Greenpoint ferry to the new Calvary Cemetery via present Greenpoint Avenue (1853-54). The 1848 establishment of the large Catholic cemetery (Calvary Cemetery), on an old estate north of the Penny Bridge, reflected the absence of any competing land use demands along most of the waterway. Water transport remained a better means of moving goods and people between the local villages and nearby urban areas; steamboats served the cemetery until around 1870.5 Local road development in the late 1860s included the first Vernon Avenue Bridge over Newtown Creek (removed and replaced by the Pulaski Bridge), and a bridge over Dutch Kills on present Borden Avenue. In part to secure public funding for street improvements in Hunter's Point, Henry Anable sought to incorporate the area in 1870 as part of Long Island City, which also absorbed the villages of Astoria, Ravenswood, and Dutch Kills.6 Table 1 below provides an overview of the bridges built across Newtown Creek as presented in USCG’s Bridges over Navigable Waters of the United States – Atlantic Coast. In 1927, the marine and land traffic conditions necessitated USACE to establish operating regulations for the Vernon Avenue and Grand Street Bridges. Both bridges required to open on signal except that they could remain closed for ten minutes each hour. 5 Stiles 1869; W.W. Munsell & Co. 1882; Armbruster 1942; Seyfried 1984; PB draft report 6 Seyfried 1984; PB 2000 Kosciuszko Bridge Project II-2 September 22, 2005 Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis Chapter II TABLE 1: BRIDGES OVER NEWTOWN CREEK AND ITS TRIBUTARIES Vertical Mile Above Horizontal MLW MHW Mouth Bridge [Owner] Type (feet) (feet) (feet) Use Permit Complete 0.4 Vernon Avenue (now Blvd) Removed 1860s 0.6 Pulaski Bridge [NYC] Bascule 150 43 39 Highway 7/2005 9/1954 0.85 Mouth Dutch Kills (DK) 1.1 Long Island
Recommended publications
  • The Drawingboard
    The Drawingboard September 2006 Volume 6, Number 9 In This Issue President’s Message • President’s Message By Brian Flynn, P.E. President • Next Meeting – Sept 28th @ 6:30PM Welcome back, I hope everyone took some time to enjoy the sumer weather. It was a wonderful summer marred only by the • UPDATE – Dept. of Buildings Park's Department last minute cancellation of the PDC Picnic in News Brief August. Now that fall has arrived, we are back in full swing with • Useful Websites for Engineers our schedule of Chapter Meetings and events. This month's • Profile of an Engineer meeting promises to be very interesting with our sponsor Hilti discussing Firestopping techniques. As you all know Professional • 2006 Meeting Schedule Development Hours (PDH's) are available for free to our • Professional Directory and members at all of our meetings every month. In addition, the Sponsors PDC has a lecture series for additional PDH's every month as • PIE August Newsletter well. The next lecture on Tuesday, October 17 will most likely (attached) feature Tim Lynch, PE of the Building Department's Forensic Unit to discuss shoring and underpinning. I would like to announce the appointment of several individuals Board of Directors to head chapter committees. First is Sal Galletta, PE who will Brian Flynn, President head our Committee for Political Action to spear head actions to P.E. (718) 707-0416 promote licensed engineering, including the proposed resolution George L. to create a position of Deputy Mayor for Infrastructure, who is a 1ST Vice Pres. Tavoulareas, licensed engineer or registered architect.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations & Accomplishments
    INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS East River Bridges A $2.8 billion reconstruction program is underway to rehabilitate all four East River crossings. In 2002, these bridges carried some 467,080 vehicles per day. In 2002, working in coordination with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies, the Division implemented enhanced security measures on these bridges. This work is ongoing. BROOKLYN BRIDGE The Brooklyn Bridge carried some 121,145 vehicles per day in 2002. The $467 million reconstruction commenced in 1980 with Contract #1, will continue with Contract #6, currently in the design phase and scheduled for completion in 2012, and will end with a seismic retrofit of the bridge, slated for completion in 2013. Work completed on the bridge to date includes reconditioning of the main cables, replacement of the suspenders and cable stays, rehabilitation of the stiffening trusses, and the replacement of the suspended spans deck. The next work scheduled for the bridge is a project to replace the existing travelers with a state of the art technology system. Construction is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2005 and conclude in the spring of 2007. Brooklyn Bridge in 1909 Pedestrian Vibration Study The major blackout of August 14, 2003 forced City officials to close the bridge to vehicular traffic and open the entire bridge to pedestrians. During this mass exodus, several pedestrians reported that the bridge was vibrating and thus causing them great anxiety. At the request of the Office of Emergency Management, an emergency inspection of the bridge was performed that evening as a result of these complaints of “swaying”; no structural problems were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 148/Tuesday, August 1, 2000/Rules
    46870 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 1, 2000 / Rules and Regulations significant economic impact on a Civil Justice Reform Dated: July 19, 2000. substantial number of small entities. G.N. Naccara, ``Small entities'' comprises small This rule meets applicable standards Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, businesses, not-for-profit organizations in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive First Coast Guard District. that are independently owned and Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to [FR Doc. 00±19396 Filed 7±31±00; 8:45 am] operated and are not dominant in their minimize litigation, eliminate BILLING CODE 4910±15±P fields, and governmental jurisdictions ambiguity, and reduce burden. with populations less than 50,000. Protection of Children The Coast Guard certifies under 5 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have We have analyzed this rule under a significant economic impact on a Executive Order 13045, Protection of Coast Guard substantial number of small entities. Children from Environmental Health 33 CFR Part 117 This conclusion is based on the fact that Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not three of the bridges presently open after an economically significant rule and a six-hour notice May 1 through does not concern an environmental risk [CGD01±99±069] September 30, which is greater than the to health or risk to safety that may proposed two-hour notice during those disproportionately affect children. RIN 2115±AE47 five months. The Coast Guard believes that the Environment Drawbridge Operation Regulations: two-hour advance notice October 1 Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, English The Coast Guard considered the through April 30 is reasonable because Kills and their tributaries, New York the bridges will still open on signal environmental impact of this rule and provided the two-hour notice is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Newtown Creek Project Packet
    NEWTOWN CREEK PROJECT PACKET Name: ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTORY READING: Encyclopedia. “Newtown Creek.” The Encyclopedia of New York City. 2nd ed. 2010. Print. Adaptation Newtown Creek is a tributary of the East River. It extends inland for a distance of 3.5 miles, including a number of canals into Brooklyn, and it is the boundary between Brooklyn and Queens. The creek was the route by which European colonists first reached Maspeth in 1642. During the American Revolution the British spent the winter near the creek. Commercial vessels and small boats sailed the creek in the early nineteenth century. About 1860 the first oil and coal oil refineries opened along the banks and began dumping sludge and acids into the water; sewers were built to accommodate the growing neighborhoods of Williamsburg and Greenpoint and discharged their wastes directly into the creek, which by 1900 was known for pollution and foul odors. The water corroded the paint on the undersides of ships, and noxious deposits were left on the banks by the tides. High-level bridges were built from 1903 (some remain). State and city commissions sought unsuccessfully to improve the creek as it became of the busiest commercial waterways in the country, second only to the Mississippi River. The creek was dredged constantly and widened by the federal government to accommodate marine traffic; the creek’s natural depth was between 4 and 12 feet. After World War II the creek’s importance as a shipping route decreased, but it continued to be the site of many industrial plants. During the 1940s and 1950s, leaks at oil refineries including ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco precipitated one of the largest underground oil spills in history.
    [Show full text]
  • July 8 Grants Press Release
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Gowanus Canal & Newtown Creek Superfund Sites: a Proposal
    Gowanus Canal & Newtown Creek Superfund Sites: A Proposal by Larry Schnapf he federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2010 designated as fed­ eral superfund sites the entire length of T the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn and 3.8 miles of Newtown Creek on the border of Queens and Brooklyn. Property owners near these water bodies fear that EPA's action will lower property values and make it even more difficult to obtain loans and other­ wise develop their land. Many small businesses also fear that they may become responsible for paying a portion of the cleanup costs. The superfund process could take five to ten years to complete, during which time property owners will be faced with significant economic uncertainty. There is, however, a way tore­ lieve many of the smaller property owners by giving them an early release. Gowanus Canal Superfund Site The Gowanus Canal (Canal) runs for 1.8 miles through the Brooklyn residential neighborhoods of Gowanus, Park Slope, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens, TABLE CJF' CONTENTS and Red Hook. The adjacent waterfront is primarily commercial and industrial, currently consisting of Legislative Update ....................... 75 concrete plants, warehouses, and parking lots. At one CityRegs Update......................... 75 time Brooklyn Union Gas, the predecessor of National Decisions of Interest Grid, operated a large manufactured gas facility on Housing ............................ 76 the shores of the Canal. Affirmative Litigation ................. 77 EPA's initial investigation identified a variety of Human Rights ....................... 77 contaminants in the Canal's sediments including poly­ Health .............................. 79 cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organ­ Audits & Reports ..................... 79 ic contaminants (VOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls Land Use ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Reel-It-In-Brooklyn
    REEL IT IN! BROOKLYN Fish Consumption Education Project in Brooklyn ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This research and outreach project was developed by Going Coastal, Inc. Team members included Gabriel Rand, Zhennya Slootskin and Barbara La Rocco. Volunteers were vital to the execution of the project at every stage, including volunteers from Pace University’s Center for Community Action and Research, volunteer translators Inessa Slootskin, Annie Hongjuan and Bella Moharreri, and video producer Dave Roberts. We acknowledge support from Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz and funding from an Environmental Justice Research Impact Grant of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Photos by Zhennya Slootskin, Project Coordinator. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Study Area 3. Background 4. Methods 5. Results & Discussion 6. Conclusions 7. Outreach Appendix A: Survey List of Acronyms: CSO Combined Sewer Overflow DEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection DOH New York State Department of Health DPR New York City Department of Parks & Recreation EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GNRA Gateway National Recreation Area NOAA National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency OPRHP New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls WIC Women, Infant and Children program Reel It In Brooklyn: Fish Consumption Education Project Page 2 of 68 Abstract Brooklyn is one of America’s largest and fastest growing multi‐ethnic coastal counties. All fish caught in the waters of New York Harbor are on mercury advisory. Brooklyn caught fish also contain PCBs, pesticides, heavy metals, many more contaminants. The waters surrounding Brooklyn serve as a source of recreation, transportation and, for some, food.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center
    Greenpoint Energy Center Site This Upland Site Summary was authored by National Grid. The opinions, statements, and conclusions herein are solely those of National Grid. They are not adopted by and should not be attributed to any other Person. SITE NAME: NATIONAL GRID: GREENPOINT ENERGY CENTER Address: 287 Maspeth Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11211 Tax Lot Parcel(s): Brooklyn, Block 2837, Lot 1 Latitude: 40.720500 - 40° 43’ 5.30’’ Longitude: 73.931800 - 73° 55’ 51.24’’ Regulatory Programs/Numbers/Codes: NYSDEC Codes 224052, V00631, 610000X6OG - Division of Air Resources ID, (NYSDEC)00157 - Compliance Data System ID, (USEPA)NYD986871077 - Facility Index Database System ID, (USEPA)NYD006978795 - Resource Conservation Recovery Act ID , (USEPA) Plant ID 110002337784, Spill No. 9009058, 9111530, 9211562, 9301329, 9305107, 9606233, 9714234, 0004653, 0104143, 0106270, 0202908, 0303442, 0310061, 0413650, 0506134, 0908424, 0908872, 1006581, and 1012824. Analytical Data Status: Electronic Data Available Hardcopies Only No Data Available 1 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN (COPCs) TRANSPORT PATHWAYS TO THE CREEK The current understanding of the transport mechanisms of contaminants from the upland portions of the Greenpoint Energy Center (Site) to Newtown Creek is summarized in this section and Table 1. Overland Transport: No specific evidence of overland transport was identified in the available site records. The pathway has not been evaluated for completeness but will be under investigation in the near future. Bank Erosion: A relieving platform (bulkhead) adjacent to Newtown Creek extends along the eastern part of the Site. No specific evidence of bank erosion was identified in the available Draft Upland Site Summary May 2012 Newtown Creek RI/FS 1 110782-01.01 Greenpoint Energy Center Site site records.
    [Show full text]
  • RMM02688.Pdf
    This document is from the Cornell University Library's Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections located in the Carl A. Kroch Library. If you have questions regarding this document or the information it contains, contact us at the phone number or e-mail listed below. Our website also contains research information and answers to frequently asked questions. http://rmc.library.cornell.edu Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections 2B Carl A. Kroch Library Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Phone: (607) 255-3530 Fax: (607) 255-9524 E-mail: [email protected] Regional Plan Association. 70 Records, 1919-19H Guide V0l. 1 Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections Cornell University Ithaca, New York February 1995 Close study of guide far 1st 54 (1/3rd of total) revealed no mention of F. Horner, but, the fdlwin,: contain files for the exrly 1940's: Box 2, has pei-.corr. of the engineering staff. F. 24 , late 90's and '40's m Box 3 - numerous 1940's entries in re defense z2 u Box 14- FHA, 1941 r?t: ? Pox 38, clipping files, 1940-41 2Z %x 47, Bd. of Directors corresp., 1930-45 4 - U 2 Reminder of guide (Box2s 55-162) also checked: €2 Box 60. Annual Reports, numbered, but no yrs. given, Folders 1-4 d 3 66, Folder 15, "Major Accomplishments of R.P.A. l9u2-1946" 67, Nev Jersey files by county, 1930's-'50's 8 69, N.J. Planning, late '30's-early '50's $ 70, St. hrence Seaway, 1941 5 -1 -1 Port of New York Authority, 1933-56 zW 71.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Heights Historic District
    New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission Jackson Heights Historic District tlm (Cuurt lirksmi ^eu;l|ts, Jfrh ^*rk October 19, 1993 New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission JACKSON HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT Prepared by the Research Department, Marjorie Pearson, Director Editors: Elisa Urbanelli, Research Department Editor Anthony W. Robins, Director of Special Projects Research/Writing: Luella Adams James T. Dillon Joseph Brooks, Ph.D. Patricia Garbe Donald Presa Anthony W. Robins Graphics: Richard Brotherton Report Layout: Marion Cleaver The Landmarks Preservation Commission Laurie Beckelman, Chair Sarah Bradford Landau, Vice-Chair William E. Davis Rev. Thomas F. Pike Ulrich Franzen Stephen Raphael Jack S. Freeman Vicki Match Suna Hui Mei Grove Charles Sachs Commissioners I In memory of Luella Adams whose survey and research work proved invaluable to the creation of the Jackson Heights Historic District ( IE as 3n' I! ers. B O o 55 § §• o vo 3 - 'I O \g J U 3 u> 3 gM3T o L 57-57. J 7-59 79™ ST 97-55 M-27 I I Jjjgfr 34-Ig 80™ ST J>-(5 z 9 o 3D 1 »»-ifr ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study of a potential historic district in the Jackson Heights area required the participation of many people over the course of several years. In 1987 Gene A. Norman, then Chairman, directed the Commission's Survey Department to undertake a survey of Queens Community Board 3 which includes Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, and Corona. This work was undertaken largely by Survey staff member Luella Adams and resulted in a report presented to the Commission, containing recommendations for potential historic districts and individual landmarks within the area of the Community Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide INTRODUCTION . .2 1 CONEY ISLAND . .3 2 OCEAN PARKWAY . .11 3 PROSPECT PARK . .16 4 EASTERN PARKWAY . .22 5 HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR . .29 6 FOREST PARK . .36 7 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK . .42 8 KISSENA-CUNNINGHAM CORRIDOR . .54 9 ALLEY POND PARK TO FORT TOTTEN . .61 CONCLUSION . .70 GREENWAY SIGNAGE . .71 BIKE SHOPS . .73 2 The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway System ntroduction New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (Parks) works closely with The Brooklyn-Queens the Departments of Transportation Greenway (BQG) is a 40- and City Planning on the planning mile, continuous pedestrian and implementation of the City’s and cyclist route from Greenway Network. Parks has juris- Coney Island in Brooklyn to diction and maintains over 100 miles Fort Totten, on the Long of greenways for commuting and Island Sound, in Queens. recreational use, and continues to I plan, design, and construct additional The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway pro- greenway segments in each borough, vides an active and engaging way of utilizing City capital funds and a exploring these two lively and diverse number of federal transportation boroughs. The BQG presents the grants. cyclist or pedestrian with a wide range of amenities, cultural offerings, In 1987, the Neighborhood Open and urban experiences—linking 13 Space Coalition spearheaded the parks, two botanical gardens, the New concept of the Brooklyn-Queens York Aquarium, the Brooklyn Greenway, building on the work of Museum, the New York Hall of Frederick Law Olmsted, Calvert Vaux, Science, two environmental education and Robert Moses in their creations of centers, four lakes, and numerous the great parkways and parks of ethnic and historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Concourse Historic District Designation Report October 25, 2011
    Grand Concourse Historic District Designation Report October 25, 2011 Cover Photograph: 1020 Grand Concourse (Executive Towers) (far left) through 900 Grand Concourse (Concourse Plaza Hotel) (far right) Christopher D. Brazee, October 2011 Grand Concourse Historic District Designation Report Essay researched and written by Jennifer L. Most Architects’ Appendix researched and written by Marianne S. Percival Building Profiles by Jennifer L. Most, Marianne S. Percival and Donald Presa Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Additional Photographs by Marianne S. Percival and Jennifer L. Most Map by Jennifer L. Most Technical Assistance by Lauren Miller Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAND CONCOURSE HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP…………………………………BEFORE PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING .............................................................................................. 1 GRAND CONCOURSE HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES .............................................................. 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 4 THE HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE GRAND CONCOURSE HISTORIC
    [Show full text]