DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Vol. 79 Monday, No. 36 February 24, 2014 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Species Status for the Georgetown Salamander and Salado Salamander Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Feb 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\24FER2.SGM 24FER2 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES2 10236 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR endangered or threatened throughout all but at that time, it was already a or a significant portion of its range. candidate species whose listing was Fish and Wildlife Service Listing a species as an endangered or precluded by higher priority actions. threatened species can only be The Salado salamander was included 50 CFR Part 17 completed by issuing a rule. in nine Candidate Notices of Review: • 67 FR 40657, June 13, 2002; [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0035; This rule lists the Georgetown and Salado salamanders as threatened • 69 FR 24876, May 4, 2004; 4500030113] • species under the Act. 70 FR 24870, May 11, 2005; RIN 1018–AY22 • 71 FR 53756, September 12, 2006; The basis for our action. Under the • Act, we can determine that a species is 72 FR 69034, December 6, 2007; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife • an endangered or threatened species 73 FR 75176, December 10, 2008; and Plants; Determination of • 74 FR 57804, November 9, 2009; based on any of five factors: (A) The Threatened Species Status for the • 75 FR 69222, November 10, 2010; present or threatened destruction, Georgetown Salamander and Salado and modification, or curtailment of its Salamander Throughout Their Ranges • 76 FR 66370, October 26, 2011. habitat or range; (B) Overutilization for The listing priority number has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, commercial, recreational, scientific, or remained at 2 throughout the reviews, Interior. educational purposes; (C) Disease or indicating that threats to the species ACTION: Final rule. predation; (D) The inadequacy of were both imminent and high in existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) magnitude. In addition, on May 11, SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Other natural or manmade factors 2004, the Service received a petition Wildlife Service (Service), determine affecting its continued existence. We from the Center for Biological Diversity threatened status for the Georgetown have determined that the Georgetown to list 225 species we previously had salamander (Eurycea naufragia) and the and Salado salamanders are threatened identified as candidates for listing in Salado salamander (Eurycea under the Act due to threats faced by accordance with section 4 of the Act, chisholmensis) under the Endangered the species both now and in the future including the Salado salamander. Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. from Factors A, D, and E. On August 22, 2012, we published a The effect of this regulation is to Peer review and public comment. We proposed rule to list as endangered and conserve the two salamander species sought comments from independent designate critical habitat for the Austin and their habitats under the Act. This specialists to ensure that our blind salamander (Eurycea final rule implements the Federal designation is based on scientifically waterlooensis), Jollyville Plateau protections provided by the Act for sound data, assumptions, and analyses. salamander (Eurycea tonkawae), these species. We are also notifying the We invited these peer reviewers to Georgetown salamander, and Salado public that, in addition to this final comment on our listing proposal. We salamanders (77 FR 50768). That listing determination, today we publish also considered all comments and proposal had a 60-day comment period, a proposed special rule under the Act information received during the ending October 22, 2012. We held a for the Georgetown salamander. comment period (see Summary of public meeting and hearing in Round DATES: This rule becomes effective Comments and Recommendations Rock, Texas, on September 5, 2012, and March 26, 2014. section below). a second public meeting and hearing in ADDRESSES: This final rule is available Background Austin, Texas, on September 6, 2012. on the Internet at http:// On January 25, 2013, we reopened the www.regulations.gov and http:// Previous Federal Action public comment period on the August www.fws.gov/southwest/es/ The Georgetown salamander was 22, 2012, proposed listing and critical AustinTexas/. Comments and materials included in 10 Candidate Notices of habitat designation; announced the received, as well as supporting Review: availability of a draft economic analysis; documentation used in preparing this • 66 FR 54808, October 30, 2001; and an amended required final rule, are available for public • 67 FR 40657, June 13, 2002; determinations section of the proposal inspection, by appointment, during • 69 FR 24876, May 4, 2004; (78 FR 5385). On August 20, 2013, we normal business hours, at U.S. Fish and • 70 FR 24870, May 11, 2005; extended the final determination for the Wildlife Service, Austin Ecological • 71 FR 53756, September 12, 2006; Georgetown and Salado salamanders by Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER • 72 FR 69034, December 6, 2007; 6 months due to substantial INFORMATION CONTACT). • 73 FR 75176, December 10, 2008; disagreement regarding: (1) The short- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: • 74 FR 57804, November 9, 2009; and long-term population trends of Adam Zerrenner, Field Supervisor, U.S. • 75 FR 69222, November 10, 2010; these two species; (2) the interpretation Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin and of water quality and quantity Ecological Services Field Office, 10711 • 76 FR 66370, October 26, 2011. degradation information as it relates to Burnet Rd, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758; In the 2008 review, the listing priority the status of these two species; and (3) by telephone 512–490–0057; or by number was lowered from 2 to 8, the effectiveness of conservation facsimile 512–490–0974. Persons who indicating that threats to the species practices and regulatory mechanisms use a telecommunications device for the were imminent, but moderate to low in (78 FR 51129). That comment period deaf (TDD) may call the Federal magnitude. This reduction in listing closed on September 19, 2013. Information Relay Service (FIRS) at priority number was primarily due to Since that time, the City of 800–877–8339. the land acquisition and conservation Georgetown, Texas, prepared and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: efforts of the Williamson County finalized ordinances for the Georgetown Conservation Foundation. In addition, salamander. All 17 of the known Executive Summary we were petitioned by the Center for Georgetown salamander locations are Why we need to publish a rule. Under Biological Diversity to list the within the City of Georgetown’s the Act, a species may warrant Georgetown salamander as an jurisdiction for residential and protection through listing if it is endangered species on May 11, 2004, commercial development. The enacted VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Feb 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24FER2.SGM 24FER2 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 10237 ordinances were directed at alleviating pH, and alkalinity) maintained by Range threats to the Georgetown salamander groundwater from various sources. The The habitats of the Georgetown and from urban development by requiring Georgetown and Salado salamanders Salado salamanders occur in the geologic assessments prior to depend on high-quality water in Northern Segment of the Edwards construction, establishing occupied site sufficient quantity and quality to meet Aquifer. The recharge and contributing protections through stream buffers, their life-history requirements for zones of this segment of the Edwards maintaining water quality through best survival, growth, and reproduction. Aquifer are found in portions of Travis, management practices, developing a Much of this water is sourced from the Williamson, and Bell Counties, Texas water quality management plan for the Northern Segment of the Edwards (Jones 2003, p. 3). City of Georgetown, and monitoring Aquifer, which is a karst aquifer occupied spring sites by an adaptive characterized by open chambers such as Diet management working group. In order to caves, fractures, and other cavities that Although we are unaware of detailed consider the ordinances in our final were formed either directly or indirectly dietary studies for Georgetown and listing determination, on January 7, by dissolution of subsurface rock Salado salamanders, their diets are 2014 (79 FR 800), we reopened the formations. Water for the salamanders is presumed to be similar to other Eurycea comment period for 15 days on the provided by infiltration of surface water species, which consist of small aquatic proposed listing rule to allow the public through the soil or recharge features invertebrates such as amphipods, an opportunity to provide comment on (caves, faults, fractures, sinkholes, or copepods, isopods, and insect larvae the application of the City of other open cavities) into the Edwards (COA 2001, pp. 5–6). A stomach content Georgetown’s ordinances to our status Aquifer, which discharges from springs analysis by the City of Austin determination under section 4(a)(1) of as groundwater (Schram 1995, p. 91). demonstrated that the Jollyville Plateau the Act. The Georgetown and Salado salamander preys on varying This rule constitutes our final salamanders spend varying portions of proportions of aquatic invertebrates, determination to list the Georgetown their life within their surface habitats such as ostracods, copepods, mayfly and Salado salamanders as threatened (the wetted top layer of substrate in or larvae, fly larvae, snails, water mites, species. near spring openings and pools as well aquatic beetles, and stone fly larvae, as spring runs) and subsurface habitats depending on the location of the site Species Information (within caves or other underground (Bendik 2011b, pers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Headstart 08/1994 Program (NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-3) TED Regulations for Shrimp Trawls 57 FR 57348 12/04/1992 Recovery Plan - U.S
    Fishing Permits Habitat Conservation Grants Fisheries Environmental Analyses Endangered Spec Search Go fish! nmlkji This si nmlkj All of NMFS Home Threatened and Endangered Species Divisions/Branches Lists What We Do Fishery Bulletins The following list of species under NMFS Fishery Quotas jurisdiction, listed as threatened or endangered, Fishery Regulations for each state and territory. Click on the state, News/Media territory or areas below to view a list of Species: National Employee 1. Southeast Region (North Carolina to Texas and Locator the Caribbean) FOIA Information 2. South Atlantic (North Carolina to Key West Public Records Florida) Request 3. Gulf of Mexico 4. Alabama 5. Florida - Atlantic Coast 6. Florida - Gulf Coast 7. Georgia 8. Louisiana 9. Mississippi 10. North Carolina 11. Puerto Rico 12. South Carolina 13. Texas 14. U.S. Virgin Islands Home · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer · About Us · Information Quality · Contact Us · Last Updated: February 2, 2010 NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources OPR Home | About OPR | Species | Permits | Laws & Policies | Programs | Education | Publications Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) Species Marine Mammals Status | Taxonomy | Species Description | Habitat | Distribution | Cetaceans Population Trends | Threats | Conservation Efforts | Regulatory Overview | Pinnipeds Key Documents | More Info Marine Turtles Marine & Anadromous Fish Status Marine Invertebrates & ESA Threatened - throughout its range Plants Species of Concern Taxonomy Threatened & Endangered Kingdom: Animalia Species Phylum: Chordata Critical Habitat Maps Class: Reptilia Order: Testudines Loggerhead turtle hatchling (Caretta caretta) Family: Cheloniidae Contact OPR Photo: Mary Wozny, Broward Glossary Genus: Caretta County Florida Sea Turtle OPR Site Map Species: caretta Conservation Program Species Description Did You Know? Loggerheads were named for their relatively large heads, which support powerful jaws and enable them to feed on Search OPR hard-shelled prey, such as whelks and conch.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0048; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 201]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/15/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-17921, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0048; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 201] RIN 1018–BE78 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Georgetown and Salado Salamanders AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule; revisions and reopening of comment period. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are revising our proposed designation of critical habitat for the Georgetown salamander (Eurycea naufragia) and Salado salamander (Eurycea chisholmensis) in Bell and Williamson Counties, Texas. Based on published genetic analyses, we are revising the distribution of the Georgetown and Salado salamanders and are adjusting previously proposed critical habitat units accordingly. We also propose changes to our description of the physical or biological features essential to the conservation of the species. We propose a total of approximately 1,519 acres (ac) (622 hectares (ha)) of critical habitat for the species in Bell and Williamson Counties, Texas. The total amount of critical habitat we are proposing for both salamanders has increased by approximately 116 ac (47 ha). The reasons for this increase are the addition of a new occupied site for the Salado salamander and refined mapping of previously proposed critical habitat units based on more precise spring locations. We also announce the availability of a draft economic analysis (DEA) of the revised proposed designation of critical habitat for the Georgetown and Salado salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-Dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus Spp
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2005 The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia Michael Steven Osbourn Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Osbourn, Michael Steven, "The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia" (2005). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 735. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Michael Steven Osbourn Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Daniel K. Evans, PhD Thomas G. Jones, PhD Marshall University May 2005 Abstract The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Michael S. Osbourn There are over 4000 documented caves in West Virginia, potentially providing refuge and habitat for a diversity of amphibians and reptiles. Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus porphyriticus, are among the most frequently encountered amphibians in caves. Surveys of 25 caves provided expanded distribution records and insight into ecology and diet of G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist and Annotated Bibliography of the Subterranean Aquatic Fauna of Texas
    A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS JAMES R. REDDELL and ROBERT W. MITCHELL Texas Technological College WATER RESOURCES \ CENTER Lubbock, Texas WRC 69-6 INTERNATIONAL CENTER for ARID and August 1969 SEMI-ARID LAND STUDIES A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS James R. Reddell and Robert W. Mitchell Department of Biology Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTION In view of the ever-increasing interest in all studies relating to the water resources of Texas, we have found it timely to prepare this guide to the fauna and biological literature of our subterranean waters. The value of such a guide has already been demonstrated by Clark (1966) in his "Publications, Personnel, and Government Organizations Related to the Limnology, Aquatic Biology and Ichthyology of the Inland Waters of Texas". This publication dea ls primarily with inland surface waters, however, barely touching upon the now rather extensive literature which has accumulated on the biology of our subterranean waters. To state a n obvious fact, it is imperative that our underground waters receive the attention due them. They are one of our most important resources. Those subterranean waters for which biological data exi st are very un­ equally distributed in the state. The best known are those which are acces­ sible to collection and study via the entrances of caves. Even in cavernous regions there exist inaccessible deep aquifers which have yielded little in­ formation as yet. Biological data from the underground waters of non-cave rn­ ous areas are virtually non-existant.
    [Show full text]
  • Salado Residents Want Better Science on Salamander
    Shopping Map of Salado on pages 4B-5B Salado illageillage oiceoice VOL. XXXV, NUMBER 9V TVHUrsDAY, JUNE 21, 2012 254/947-5321 FAX 254/947-9479 V V WWW.SALADOVILLAGEVOICE.COM 50¢ Residents want better science on salamander BY TIM FLEISCHER of the Salado Creek water- line the approach to the EDITOR-IN-CHIEF shed and the water quality $60,000 year-long study and water quantity of the and to introduce the prin- As traffic on Highway habitat of the Salado sala- cipal scientists who will be 45 in Round Rock roared mander. gathering data in the com- overhead, Congressman Neither of these efforts ing months. John Carter announced are likely to impact the Meanwhile, the U.S. at a June 18 press confer- pending decision by the Fish and Wildlife Service ence his plans to attach an U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser- (FWS) is slated to an- amendment to the Interior vice to add the Salado sala- nounce whether the four and Environment Appro- mander as an Endangered species of salamanders in priations Bill that would species. Bell, Williamson and Tra- strip any funding “to ad- While Rep. Carter said vis counties will be listed vance or pursue adding any he will propose the House as endangered. The dead- of the population of blind bill amendment within a line for FWS to propose salamanders of Salado, week, the Appropriations those species for listing is Jollyville Plateau, George- bill has many hurdles to Sept. 30. The schedule for town or Austin, Texas, to pass. First, it has to get out listing the salamander spe- the list of endangered spe- of Appropriations com- cies is part of a settlement cies or as a threatened spe- mittee (with the amend- between USFWS and the cies under the Endangered ment in place) and to the Center for Biological Di- Species Act of 1973.” House floor.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Abundance of Predators
    ********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* Document-ID: 2194356 Patron: Note: NOTICE: ********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* Pages: 10 Printed: 01-18-12 11:05:38 Sender: Ariel / Windows Journal Title: Texas Journal of Science 1/18/2012 7:45 AM (Please update within 24 hours) Volume: 27 Issue: 1 Call#: 01 .T4 MonthNear: 1976 Pages: 179-195 Location: evans Article Author: Tupa and Davis Not Wanted Date: 07/14/2012 Article Title: Population Dynamics of the San Marcos, Texas salamander Eurycea nana Status: T AES San Antonio Phone: 830-214-5878 Note: E-mail: [email protected] Name: Bandel, Micaela T AES San Antonio ,.. N z Address: 1- 2632 Broadway, Suite 301 South San Antonio, TX 78215 "Ccu ::::i ..J 178 THE TEXAS JOURNAL OF SC lENC£ appears to be less tolerant of arid conditions than B spec· . lOSUS and th spnng and summer of 1971 may have prevented this species f ' e dry ing in that year. rom reproduc- I wish to thank Dr. E. William Behrens for supplying the c1· data and the Port Aransas Police for their patience with my imatologica} pOPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE SAN MARCOS ditions. nocturnal expe. SALAMANDER, EURYCEA NANA BISHOP LITERATURE CITED by DIANNA DOWDEN TUPA 1 and WILLIAM K . DAVIS Blair, W. F., 1953 - Growth, dispersal, and age of sexual maturity of theM . Department of Biology, Southwest Texas State Untversity, San (Bufo val/iceps Weigmann). Copeia 1953: 20 . exican toad 8 212 Marcos 78666 Bragg, A. N. and C. C. Smith, 1943 - Observations on the ecology d 0; ~.nura. IV The ecological distribution of toads in Oklahoma~c;/~.;~~:s~1- ABSTRACT 0 Results of a study of the population ecology and demography of a paedogenetic spe­ Conant, R., 1958 - A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians H h .
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Salamandra Salamandra</I>
    International Journal of Speleology 46 (3) 321-329 Tampa, FL (USA) September 2017 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Subterranean systems provide a suitable overwintering habitat for Salamandra salamandra Monika Balogová1*, Dušan Jelić2, Michaela Kyselová1, and Marcel Uhrin1,3 1Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Šrobárova 2, 041 54 Košice, Slovakia 2Croatian Institute for Biodiversity, Lipovac I., br. 7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 1176, 165 21 Praha, Czech Republic Abstract: The fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) has been repeatedly noted to occur in natural and artificial subterranean systems. Despite the obvious connection of this species with underground shelters, their level of dependence and importance to the species is still not fully understood. In this study, we carried out long-term monitoring based on the capture-mark- recapture method in two wintering populations aggregated in extensive underground habitats. Using the POPAN model we found the population size in a natural shelter to be more than twice that of an artificial underground shelter. Survival and recapture probabilities calculated using the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model were very constant over time, with higher survival values in males than in females and juveniles, though in terms of recapture probability, the opposite situation was recorded. In addition, survival probability obtained from Cormack-Jolly-Seber model was higher than survival from POPAN model. The observed bigger population size and the lower recapture rate in the natural cave was probably a reflection of habitat complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • San Marcos Recovery Plan
    ~""'.- San Marcos Recovery Plan U. • Fish & Wildlife Service Albu,querque, New Mexico .-1-934--- The San Marcos Recovery Plan FOR San Hareqs River, Endangered and Threatened Species San ,Marcos Gambusia (Gambusia georgei) Hubbs and Peden ~ountainDarter (Etheostoma fonticola) (Jordan and Gilbert) San Marcos Salamander (Eurycea nana) Bish~p Te1,Ca s Wildr ice" (Z.tzaniatexana}Hitchcock PREPARED BY THE SAN MARIDS REIDVERY TEAM Dr. Robert J. Edwards, Leader, Pan American University, Edinburg, Texas 78539 Mr. Harold E. Beaty, 3414 Forest Trail, Temple, Texas 76502 Dr. Glenn Longley, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 Mr. David H. Riskind, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas 78744 Dr. Dianna D.Tupa, center for Research and Water Resources, Unlvers1tyof Texas Balcones Research' Center, Austin, Texas 78758 Dr. Bobby G.Whites ide, Southwes t Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 OONSULTANTS Mr. Harry Bishop, USFWS, Fish Cult. & Develop. Res. Center, San Marcos, Texas 78666 Dr. W. H. P. Emery, South~est Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 7e666 (Member 1981-82) Mr. Russell L. Masters, Edwards Underground Water District, San AntoniO, Texas 78205 Mr. William McPherson, Soil Conservation Service, Bastrop, Texas 78602 Mr. Floyd E. Potter, Jr., Texas Parks and lHl(,ili~~ Department, Austin, Texas 78759 i;:'y' , . // i f ,It . '1 ,/.' "V- Approved: '. ~ /-, j;t Regtaff'a i or, Region 2 U.S. Fi h, .. ' 'Wildlife Service Date: '/ .f --------~~~~~--------------------- SUMMARY 1 •. GOAL: Secure the survival and eventual recovery of the San Marcos .. gambusia, f01.nltain darter, San Marcos salamander, and Texas wildrice through protection of their natural ecosystem, the . San Marcos River.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 MO Cave Comm.Pdf
    Caves and Karst CAVES AND KARST by William R. Elliott, Missouri Department of Conservation, and David C. Ashley, Missouri Western State College, St. Joseph C A V E S are an important part of the Missouri landscape. Caves are defined as natural openings in the surface of the earth large enough for a person to explore beyond the reach of daylight (Weaver and Johnson 1980). However, this definition does not diminish the importance of inaccessible microcaverns that harbor a myriad of small animal species. Unlike other terrestrial natural communities, animals dominate caves with more than 900 species recorded. Cave communities are closely related to soil and groundwater communities, and these types frequently overlap. However, caves harbor distinctive species and communi- ties not found in microcaverns in the soil and rock. Caves also provide important shelter for many common species needing protection from drought, cold and predators. Missouri caves are solution or collapse features formed in soluble dolomite or lime- stone rocks, although a few are found in sandstone or igneous rocks (Unklesbay and Vineyard 1992). Missouri caves are most numerous in terrain known as karst (figure 30), where the topography is formed by the dissolution of rock and is characterized by surface solution features. These include subterranean drainages, caves, sinkholes, springs, losing streams, dry valleys and hollows, natural bridges, arches and related fea- Figure 30. Karst block diagram (MDC diagram by Mark Raithel) tures (Rea 1992). Missouri is sometimes called “The Cave State.” The Mis- souri Speleological Survey lists about 5,800 known caves in Missouri, based on files maintained cooperatively with the Mis- souri Department of Natural Resources and the Missouri Department of Con- servation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesohabitat Associations of the Threatened San Marcos Salamander (Eurycea Nana) Across Its Geographic Range
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 25: 307–321 (2015) Published online 19 March 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2559 Mesohabitat associations of the threatened San Marcos salamander (Eurycea nana) across its geographic range PETER H. DIAZa, JOE N. FRIESb, TIMOTHY H. BONNERa, MARA L. ALEXANDERb and WESTON H. NOWLINa,* aDepartment of Biology, Aquatic Station, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA bSan Marcos Aquatic Resource Center, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, San Marcos Texas 78666, USA ABSTRACT 1. Habitat loss is one of the most critical factors affecting the loss of species. However, habitat conservation of many threatened species is performed with incomplete information on habitat requirements and trophic ecology, thus presenting a challenge to designing and implementing recovery plans. 2. The San Marcos salamander (Eurycea nana) is a federally threatened spring-associated organism whose geographic distribution is limited to the headwaters of the San Marcos River in Texas, USA. Although its designated critical habitat includes the headwaters and the first 50 m of the river, little is known of its habitat requirements or co-occurrence with benthic macroinvertebrates and macrophytes. 3. This study examined mesohabitat associations of the salamander and patterns of co-occurrence with macrophytes and benthic invertebrates within its critical habitat. Surveys of mesohabitat characteristics were conducted during a one-year period and data were analysed to assess mesohabitat associations of the San Marcos salamander and patterns of co-occurrence with invertebrates and macrophytes. 4. Salamanders were distributed throughout the critical habitat, but were almost exclusively found in mesohabitats containing cobble and gravel with coverage of Amblystegium and filamentous algae.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors Potentially Affecting Eurycea Naufragia
    Report to the Williamson County Conservation Foundation Review of Research Literature Related to the Biology, Evolution, and Conservation of Georgetown Salamander, Eurycea naufragia Benjamin A. Pierce and Ashley Wall Department of Biology Southwestern University Georgetown, Texas 78626 June 22, 2011 1 The Georgetown Salamander The Georgetown salamander, Eurycea naufragia, is a spring and cave-dwelling salamander restricted to the San Gabriel River drainage of Williamson County, Texas. The species is known from only 15 sites occurring along the major tributaries of the upper San Gabriel River (South, Middle, and North forks and Berry Creek; Figure 1). At some of these sites, salamanders have not been observed in recent years and access to all sites is not available. All but two of the known sites are on privately-owned land. The entire range of the species occurs within the immediate vicinity of Georgetown, Texas, an area that is undergoing rapid urbanization (Figure 2), and nearly all known populations are at risk from urban development. The Georgetown salamander has been included as a candidate for listing as an endangered species (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001) but is not currently protected by federal or state regulation. Candidate species are given a priority listing by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which ranges from 1 to 12 and indicates the magnitude and immediacy of threats they face and their taxonomic uniqueness, with higher priority assigned to lower numbers. Largely because of the implementation of the Williamson County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan, the US Fish and Wildlife Service in 2008 reduced the listing priority number of the Georgetown salamander from 2 to 8 (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]