Holocaust Memorial Days in the OSCE Region an Overview of Governmental Practices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Matter of Comparison: the Holocaust, Genocides and Crimes Against Humanity an Analysis and Overview of Comparative Literature and Programs
O C A U H O L S T L E A C N O N I T A A I N R L E T L N I A R E E M C E M B R A N A Matter Of Comparison: The Holocaust, Genocides and Crimes Against Humanity An Analysis And Overview Of Comparative Literature and Programs Koen Kluessien & Carse Ramos December 2018 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance A Matter of Comparison About the IHRA The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is an intergovernmental body whose purpose is to place political and social leaders’ support behind the need for Holocaust education, remembrance and research both nationally and internationally. The IHRA (formerly the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research, or ITF) was initiated in 1998 by former Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson. Persson decided to establish an international organisation that would expand Holocaust education worldwide, and asked former president Bill Clinton and former British prime minister Tony Blair to join him in this effort. Persson also developed the idea of an international forum of governments interested in discussing Holocaust education, which took place in Stockholm between 27–29 January 2000. The Forum was attended by the representatives of 46 governments including; 23 Heads of State or Prime Ministers and 14 Deputy Prime Ministers or Ministers. The Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust was the outcome of the Forum’s deliberations and is the foundation of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. The IHRA currently has 31 Member Countries, 10 Observer Countries and seven Permanent International Partners. -
Country Report on Holocaust Education in Task Force Member Countries
Country Report on Holocaust Education in Task Force Member Countries NORWAY Date of issue: 1 November 2005 The Center for Studies of the Holocaust and Religious Minorities in Norway (The Holocaust Center), Oslo, is responsible for the following report on Holocaust education in Norway. Summary In the last 30 years, Holocaust awareness in Norway has increased in both the educational sector and society in general. The Holocaust has been given greater prominence in the educational system and in textbooks. It has also become more and more common for schools to take part in study trips to former extermination and concentration camps in Germany and Poland, such as Sachsenhausen, Ravensbrück, and Auschwitz. Work on Holocaust research, educational programmes and teacher training is intensifying. The Holocaust Center, which was established in 2001, is an important national institution in the field of Holocaust research, documentation, information and education. The Ministry of Education and Research is responsible for implementing national educational policy. A common standard is ensured through legislation and nationwide curricula. As part of an educational reform, the syllabi for all school subjects are now being revised. Implementation is scheduled for 2006–7. The new syllabuses are less specific than their predecessors, and more freedom will be given to textbook writers, head-teachers and teachers. This means that there will be a greater need for educational material about the Holocaust. In this regard, the ITF is an important forum for exchange of information, documentation and views on educational policy. Full report following the question guideline: 1. What official directives from government ministries and/or local authorities regarding the teaching of the Holocaust exist in your country? The Ministry of Education and Research is Norway’s highest public administrative agency for educational matters and is responsible for implementing national educational policy. -
Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 42)
UNITED CRC NATIONS Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/129/Add.1 6 October 2004 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Third periodic report of States parties due in 2003 NORWAY* ** [24 April 2003] * For the second periodic report submitted by Norway, see CRC/C/70/Add.2; for its consideration by the Committee on 2 June 2000, see CRC/C/SR.625-626 and CRC/C/15/Add.126. ** In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.04-44570 (E) 040105 CRC/C/129/Add.1 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Foreword ................................................................................................... 1 - 3 5 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 - 17 5 CHAPTER I. GENERAL MEASURES OF IMPLEMENTATION .... 18 - 77 8 A. Measures within national legislation and practice (article 4) ................................................................................ 18 - 53 8 B. Measures to increase awareness among adults and children of the principles and provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (article 42) .............................................. 54 - 74 17 C. Measures to make Norway’s report widely available ............ 75 - 77 22 CHAPTER II. DEFINITION OF THE CHILD ..................................... 78 - 100 23 CHAPTER III. GENERAL PRINCIPLES .............................................. 101 - 212 28 A. Non-discrimination (article 2) ............................................... 101 - 136 28 B. The best interests of the child (article 3) ............................... 137 - 175 35 C. The right to life, survival and development (article 6) .......... 176 - 180 42 D. Respect for the views of the child (article 12) ...................... -
Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Mensen, macht en mentaliteiten achter prikkeldraad: een historisch- sociologische studie van concentratiekamp Vught (1943-1944) Meeuwenoord, A.M.B. Publication date 2011 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Meeuwenoord, A. M. B. (2011). Mensen, macht en mentaliteiten achter prikkeldraad: een historisch-sociologische studie van concentratiekamp Vught (1943-1944). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:04 Oct 2021 Mensen, macht en mentaliteiten achter prikkeldraad Een historisch-sociologische studie van concentratiekamp Vught (1943-1944) Marieke Meeuwenoord 1 Mensen, macht en mentaliteiten achter prikkeldraad 2 Mensen, macht en mentaliteiten achter prikkeldraad Een historisch-sociologische studie van concentratiekamp Vught (1943-1944) ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. -
Remembering and Forgetting: the Holocaust in 21St Century Britain
Remembering and Forgetting: The Holocaust in 21st Century Britain Item Type Article Authors Critchell, Kara Citation Critchell, K. (2016). Remembering and forgetting: the Holocaust in 21st century Britain. Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History, (10), 23-59. DOI 10.48248/issn.2037-741X/813 Publisher Fondazione Centro di Documentazione Ebraica Contemporanea Journal Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 27/09/2021 19:34:33 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622948 Remembering and Forgetting: The Holocaust in 21st Century Britain “The world has lost a great man. We must never forget Sir Nicholas Winton's humanity in saving so many children from the Holocaust.”1 “MPs’ have voted against an attempt to compel the Government to offer sanctuary in the UK to 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees from Europe.”2 Although the preceding years had borne witness to a heightened engagement with the Holocaust in the political and public spheres, with the establishment of Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) on 27 January 2001, Britain entered a new phase in the development of its Holocaust consciousness. In the fifteen years since the inaugural ceremony took place Britain has sought to position itself at the very forefront of Holocaust remembrance and education on a national, international, and supranational, level.3 As such, the Holocaust has emerged as a dominant socio-political symbol in 21st century Britain despite the fact that, as Bob Moore has highlighted, “the Holocaust intersects with British history in very few ways.”4 This article will discuss the increasingly central role of Holocaust commemoration and education in 21st century Britain, and will consider how it has not only come to impact conceptualisation of the historical event, but also its influence on broader interpretations of British identity. -
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Marking 15 Years of the Stockholm Declaration 2000–2015
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Marking 15 years of the Stockholm Declaration 2000–2015 MEMBER OBSERVER The cover image shows the ‘Wall of Portraits’, which forms part COUNTRIES COUNTRIES of the permanent exhibition at the Kazerne Dossin — Memorial, Museum and Documentation Centre on Holocaust and Human Rights in Mechelen, Belgium. The wall shows over 25,800 Contents Argentina (2002) Albania (2014) deportees and spans four floors of the museum. The pictures Austria (2001) Australia (2015) of those who survived are shown in color while the pictures of those who perished are shown in black and white. For many Belgium (2005) Bulgaria (2012) of the deportees, not even a picture remains. The Stockholm Canada (2009) El Salvador (2014) Declaration states, “Our commitment must be to remember Croatia (2005) The former Yugoslav the victims who perished, respect the survivors still with us, and reaffirm humanity’s common aspiration for mutual under- Czech Republic (2002) Republic of standing and justice.” Just as the Stockholm Declaration is Denmark (2004) Macedonia (2009) the IHRA’s founding document, so the persecutees form the core Estonia (2007) Moldova (2014) of IHRA’s mandate. It is therefore considered fitting that the victims and survivors, shown as individuals and not as a perse- Finland (2010) Monaco (2015) cuted mass, occupy such a prominent place in this publication. France (1999) Portugal (2009) Photo credit: © Christophe Ketels & Kazerne Dossin Germany (1998) Turkey (2008) Greece (2005) Uruguay (2013) Hungary (2002) Introduction -
Jahresbericht !"#$
JAHRESBERICHT !"#$ 3 Inhalt 4 Vorstellung der Organisation 41 Engagement für Vielfalt und gegen Ausgrenzung 6 Rückblick 44 Internationale Bildungsarbeit 12 Ausblick 48 Ö"entlichkeitsarbeit 15 Freiwilligendienste 51 Ehrenamt 30 Highlights 54 Kirche und Gesellscha# 31 Symbol der Anerkennung: Die Freiwillige Annemarie Niemann begleitet Bundes- 57 Finanzen präsidenten beim Oradour-Besuch 34 Tschechien-Jubiläum: Lebendige 64 Danksagung Geschichte – Erinnern in der zweiten und dritten Generation 68 Organigramm 36 Familienbiogra!sche Überlegungen einer Belgien-Freiwilligen anlässlich 70 Impressum des Jubiläums 39 Sommerlager-Impression: Stumme Zeugen am Wegesrand 5 Man kann es einfach tun Die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Nationalsozialismus und seinen Verbrechen ist für Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste Motiv und Verpflichtung für konkretes Handeln in der Gegenwart. Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste steht in der mende an. In den Sommerlagern leben, lernen und Tradition der Bekennenden Kirche und trägt seit arbeiten internationale Gruppen für zwei bis drei 1958 im Rahmen von kurz- und langfristigen Frei- Wochen in unterschiedlichen Projekten. willigendiensten zu Frieden und Verständigung bei, setzt sich für Menschenrechte ein und sensibilisiert Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste sensibi- die Gesellscha# für die Auswirkungen der natio- lisiert für die heutigen Folgen des Nationalsozialis- nalsozialistischen Geschichte. Jährlich leisten rund mus und tritt aktuellen Formen von Antisemitismus, 180 Freiwillige in 13 Ländern ihren Friedensdienst. Rassismus und Ausgrenzung von Minderheiten ent- Sie begleiten ältere Menschen beispielsweise in jü- gegen. Gemeinsam mit deutschen und internatio- dischen Institutionen und Organisationen für Schoa- nalen Partner_innen engagiert sich Aktion Sühne- Überlebende, sie unterstützen sozial Benachteiligte zeichen Friedensdienste für die Entschädigung von sowie Menschen mit psychischen oder physischen Verfolgten des Nationalsozialmus und für die Rechte Beeinträchtigungen und sie engagieren sich in an- von Minderheiten. -
Refugee Policies from 1933 Until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities
Refugee Policies from 1933 until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities ihra_4_fahnen.indd 1 12.02.2018 15:59:41 IHRA series, vol. 4 ihra_4_fahnen.indd 2 12.02.2018 15:59:41 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (Ed.) Refugee Policies from 1933 until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities Edited by Steven T. Katz and Juliane Wetzel ihra_4_fahnen.indd 3 12.02.2018 15:59:42 With warm thanks to Toby Axelrod for her thorough and thoughtful proofreading of this publication, to the Ambassador Liviu-Petru Zăpirțan and sta of the Romanian Embassy to the Holy See—particularly Adina Lowin—without whom the conference would not have been possible, and to Katya Andrusz, Communications Coordinator at the Director’s Oce of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. ISBN: 978-3-86331-392-0 © 2018 Metropol Verlag + IHRA Ansbacher Straße 70 10777 Berlin www.metropol-verlag.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten Druck: buchdruckerei.de, Berlin ihra_4_fahnen.indd 4 12.02.2018 15:59:42 Content Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust ........................................... 9 About the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) .................................................... 11 Preface .................................................... 13 Steven T. Katz, Advisor to the IHRA (2010–2017) Foreword The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the Holy See and the International Conference on Refugee Policies ... 23 omas Michael Baier/Veerle Vanden Daelen Opening Remarks ......................................... 31 Mihnea Constantinescu, IHRA Chair 2016 Opening Remarks ......................................... 35 Paul R. Gallagher Keynote Refugee Policies: Challenges and Responsibilities ........... 41 Silvano M. Tomasi FROM THE 1930s TO 1945 Wolf Kaiser Introduction ............................................... 49 Susanne Heim The Attitude of the US and Europe to the Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany ....................................... -
6. DV-BEG.Pdf
Ein Service des Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz sowie des Bundesamts für Justiz ‒ www.gesetze-im-internet.de Sechste Verordnung zur Durchführung des Bundesentschädigungsgesetzes (6. DV-BEG) 6. DV-BEG Ausfertigungsdatum: 23.02.1967 Vollzitat: "Sechste Verordnung zur Durchführung des Bundesentschädigungsgesetzes vom 23. Februar 1967 (BGBl. I S. 233), die zuletzt durch § 1 der Verordnung vom 24. November 1982 (BGBl. I S. 1571) geändert worden ist" Stand: Zuletzt geändert durch § 1 V v. 24.11.1982 I 1571 Fußnote (+++ Textnachweis Geltung ab: 18.9.1965 +++) Eingangsformel Auf Grund des § 42 Abs. 2 des Bundesentschädigungsgesetzes in der Fassung des Gesetzes vom 29. Juni 1956 (Bundesgesetzbl. I S. 559, 562), zuletzt geändert durch das Gesetz vom 14. September 1965 (Bundesgesetzbl. I S. 1315), verordnet die Bundesregierung mit Zustimmung des Bundesrates: § 1 Als Konzentrationslager im Sinne des § 31 Abs. 2 BEG sind die in der Anlage aufgeführten Haftstätten anzusehen. § 2 (1) Soweit in der Anlage für einzelne Haftstätten bestimmte Zeiträume angegeben sind, gelten diese Haftstätten nur für die angegebenen Zeiträume als Konzentrationslager im Sinne des § 31 Abs. 2 BEG. (2) Die übrigen in der Anlage aufgeführten Haftstätten sind für den Zeitraum als Konzentrationslager im Sinne des § 31 Abs. 2 BEG anzusehen, während dem sie als geschlossene Lager in der Verwaltungsform eines Konzentrationslagers bestanden haben. Dies gilt insbesondere für die Zeiträume, in denen die Haftstätten dem Inspekteur der Konzentrationslager im SS-Hauptamt oder dem SS-Wirtschaftsverwaltungshauptamt, Amtsgruppe D, unterstanden haben. (3) Soweit in der Anlage für einzelne Haftstätten keine bestimmten Zeiträume angegeben sind, wird vermutet, daß diese Haftstätten am 1. November 1943 bestanden haben und von diesem Zeitpunkt an Konzentrationslager im Sinne des § 31 Abs. -
Holocaust Memorial Days an Overview of Remembrance and Education in the OSCE Region
Holocaust Memorial Days An overview of remembrance and education in the OSCE region 27 January 2015 Updated October 2015 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Albania ................................................................................................................................. 13 Andorra ................................................................................................................................. 14 Armenia ................................................................................................................................ 16 Austria .................................................................................................................................. 17 Azerbaijan ............................................................................................................................ 19 Belarus .................................................................................................................................. 21 Belgium ................................................................................................................................ 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................................................... 25 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................... -
Sharing Values to Safeguard the Future: British Holocaust Memorial Day
Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration as Epideictic rhetoric John E. Richardson, Loughborough University John E. Richardson Department of Social Sciences, Loughborough University Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK [email protected] +44(0)1509 223361 Biog John E Richardson is a Reader in Critical Discourse Studies, Department of Social Sciences, Loughborough University. His research interests include structured social inequalities, British fascism, argumentation and multimodal commemoration. His most recent book is British Fascism: A Discourse-Historic Analysis (Stuttgart: ibidem Verlag, 2017). He is Editor of the international journal Critical Discourse Studies and co-editor of Bloomsbury book series Advances in Critical Discourse Studies. From February 2017-January 2018 he was a Leverhulme Trust Research Fellow, researching the ways that Holocaust Memorial Day in the UK has changed since 2002. Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration as Epideictic rhetoric Abstract This article explores the rhetoric, and mass-mediation, of the national Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) commemoration ceremony, as broadcast on British television. I argue that the televised national ceremonies should be approached as an example of multi-genre epideictic rhetoric, working up meanings through a hybrid combination of genres (speeches, poems, readings), author/animators and modes (speech, music, light, movement and silence). Epideictic rhetoric has often been depreciated as simply ceremonial “praise or blame” speeches. However, given that the topics of praise/blame assume the existence of social norms, epideictic also acts to presuppose and evoke common values in general, and a collective recognition of shared social responsibilities in particular. -
Jean Améry and Wolfgang Hildesheimer: Ressentiments, Melancholia, and the West German Public Sphere in the 1960S and 1970S
JEAN AMÉRY AND WOLFGANG HILDESHEIMER: RESSENTIMENTS, MELANCHOLIA, AND THE WEST GERMAN PUBLIC SPHERE IN THE 1960S AND 1970S A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Melanie Steiner Sherwood January 2011 © 2011 Melanie Steiner Sherwood JEAN AMÉRY AND WOLFGANG HILDESHEIMER: RESSENTIMENTS, MELANCHOLIA, AND THE WEST GERMAN PUBLIC SPHERE IN THE 1960S AND 1970S Melanie Steiner Sherwood, Ph. D. Cornell University 2011 The dissertation revisits the West German literary scene of the 1960s and 1970s to investigate how two of its Jewish participants, Jean Améry and Wolfgang Hildesheimer, sought to promote ethical responses to the Holocaust. The study incorporates literary analysis and socio-political reflections on the ethics of public life. First, it is an analysis of the relationship between judicial confrontation of the German criminal past, the silence in the wider German cultural sphere in the wake of this confrontation, and the two writers’ efforts to expose and address this ethical disconnect (chapter I). Second, it draws attention to two very different modes of reactive affect, ressentiment and melancholia. Through readings of Hildesheimer’s novels Tynset (1965) and Masante (1973) in chapters II and III, on the one hand, and Améry’s essay “Ressentiments” (1966) and the essay-novel Lefeu oder Der Abbruch (1974) in chapters IV and V, on the other, the dissertation analyzes these two modes. Hildesheimer employed a register of ethical writing that articulated the interconnected processes of mourning and melancholia, but unlike recent scholarship that focuses on these categories and valorizes melancholia as source of productive socio-political action, Hildesheimer did not prescribe them as exemplary modes of affective reparation.