Bullet Trains
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The California High Speed Rail Proposal: a Due Diligence Report
September 2008 THE CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL PROPO S AL : A DUE DILIGENCE REPOR T By Wendell Cox and Joseph Vranich Project Director: Adrian T. Moore, Ph.D. POLICY STUDY 370 Reason Citizens Against Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation Government Waste Foundation reason.org cagw.org hjta.org/hjtf Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance Citizens Against Government Waste Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation a free society by developing, applying and (CAGW) is a private, nonprofit, nonparti- (HJTF) is devoted to promoting economic promoting libertarian principles, including education, the study of tax policy and san organization dedicated to educating the individual liberty, free markets and the rule defending the interests of taxpayers in the American public about waste, mismanage- of law. We use journalism and public policy courts. research to influence the frameworks and ment, and inefficiency in the federal govern- The Foundation funds and directs stud- actions of policymakers, journalists and ment. ies on tax and economic issues and works opinion leaders. CAGW was founded in 1984 by J. Peter to provide constructive alternatives to the Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public Grace and nationally-syndicated columnist tax-and-spend proposals from our state policy research promotes choice, competi- Jack Anderson to build support for imple- legislators. tion and a dynamic market economy as the HJTF also advances the interests of mentation of the Grace Commission recom- foundation for human dignity and progress. taxpayers in the courtroom. In appro- mendations and other waste-cutting propos- Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed priate cases, HJTF provides legal repre- research and directly engages the policy als. -
Alta Velocidade Ferroviária Em Portugal
Nuno Filipe Ramos Maranhão Alta Velocidade Ferroviária em Portugal Viabilidade económica do transporte de passageiros nos eixos prioritários Dissertação de Mestrado em Economia apresentada à Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre janeiro de 2014 Nuno Filipe Ramos Maranhão Alta Velocidade Ferroviária em Portugal Viabilidade económica do transporte de passageiros nos eixos prioritários Dissertação de Mestrado em Economia, na especialidade de Economia Industrial, apresentada à Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra para obtenção do grau de Mestre Orientador: Prof. Doutor Daniel Murta Coimbra, 2014 Agradecimentos Se o trabalho de projeto é, pela sua finalidade académica, um trabalho individual, há contributos de natureza diversa que não podem e nem devem deixar de ser realçados. Por essa razão, expresso os meus agradecimentos: Aos meus pais José e Maria e ao meu irmão César, pelo inestimável apoio e compreensão que preencheram as diversas falhas que fui tendo, e pela paciência revelada ao longo destes anos. Ao Professor Daniel Murta, meu orientador, pela competência científica e acompanhamento do trabalho, cujas críticas, correções e sugestões valorizei muito. Mas, sobretudo, pela relação de amizade e de proximidade, que espero ter sabido corresponder na dimensão que uma pessoa com a profundidade intelectual do Professor merece. Foi um privilégio. À Professora Adelaide Duarte, professora de Seminário de Investigação, porque genuinamente admiro o interesse que deposita na orientação da cadeira e pela agilidade de compreensão que consegue emprestar à multiplicidade de temas que os alunos tratam nos trabalhos de projeto. Um exemplo de nobreza e de entrega à causa da nossa Faculdade. -
Case of High-Speed Ground Transportation Systems
MANAGING PROJECTS WITH STRONG TECHNOLOGICAL RUPTURE Case of High-Speed Ground Transportation Systems THESIS N° 2568 (2002) PRESENTED AT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - LAUSANNE BY GUILLAUME DE TILIÈRE Civil Engineer, EPFL French nationality Approved by the proposition of the jury: Prof. F.L. Perret, thesis director Prof. M. Hirt, jury director Prof. D. Foray Prof. J.Ph. Deschamps Prof. M. Finger Prof. M. Bassand Lausanne, EPFL 2002 MANAGING PROJECTS WITH STRONG TECHNOLOGICAL RUPTURE Case of High-Speed Ground Transportation Systems THÈSE N° 2568 (2002) PRÉSENTÉE AU DÉPARTEMENT DE GÉNIE CIVIL ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE PAR GUILLAUME DE TILIÈRE Ingénieur Génie-Civil diplômé EPFL de nationalité française acceptée sur proposition du jury : Prof. F.L. Perret, directeur de thèse Prof. M. Hirt, rapporteur Prof. D. Foray, corapporteur Prof. J.Ph. Deschamps, corapporteur Prof. M. Finger, corapporteur Prof. M. Bassand, corapporteur Document approuvé lors de l’examen oral le 19.04.2002 Abstract 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my deep gratitude to Prof. Francis-Luc Perret, my Supervisory Committee Chairman, as well as to Prof. Dominique Foray for their enthusiasm, encouragements and guidance. I also express my gratitude to the members of my Committee, Prof. Jean-Philippe Deschamps, Prof. Mathias Finger, Prof. Michel Bassand and Prof. Manfred Hirt for their comments and remarks. They have contributed to making this multidisciplinary approach more pertinent. I would also like to extend my gratitude to our Research Institute, the LEM, the support of which has been very helpful. Concerning the exchange program at ITS -Berkeley (2000-2001), I would like to acknowledge the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation. -
Timetables ALFA Pendular/Intercities from LISBOA SANTA APOLONIA to PORTO CAMPANHA and BRAGA 07/15/2005 05:25 PM
Timetables ALFA Pendular/Intercities from LISBOA SANTA APOLONIA to PORTO CAMPANHA and BRAGA 07/15/2005 05:25 PM ALFA Pendular/Intercities Trains Timetables ALFA Pendular/Intercities See the terms of use LISBOA - PORTO - BRAGA - GUIMARAES: Train family: Train number: 121 123 521 125 127 523 Services on bord: Observations: [1] [2] [2] [2] [1] [2] LISBOA SANTA 06:55 07:55 08:55 09:55 10:55 12:55 APOLONIA LISBOA - ORIENTE 07:04 08:04 09:04 10:04 11:04 13:04 VILA FRANCA DE --- --- 09:16 --- --- 13:16 XIRA SANTAREM --- 08:43 09:47 10:43 11:43 13:47 ENTRONCAMENTO --- 09:01 10:05 11:01 12:01 14:06 FATIMA --- --- 10:19 --- --- --- CAXARIAS --- --- 10:27 --- --- 14:26 POMBAL --- 09:37 10:44 11:33 12:33 14:46 ALFARELOS --- --- 10:59 --- --- --- COIMBRA-B 08:48 10:01 11:11 11:57 12:57 15:12 PAMPILHOSA --- --- 11:21 --- --- --- MEALHADA --- --- --- --- --- 15:25 AVEIRO 09:11 10:25 11:40 12:22 13:22 15:44 ESTARREJA --- --- 11:50 --- --- 15:53 OVAR --- --- 12:00 --- --- --- ESPINHO --- 10:50 12:13 12:49 13:48 16:14 http://www.cp.pt/horarios/alfa_ic/e_401_2_66_84.html Page 1 of 4 Timetables ALFA Pendular/Intercities from LISBOA SANTA APOLONIA to PORTO CAMPANHA and BRAGA 07/15/2005 05:25 PM GAIA 09:45 11:00 12:25 13:00 14:00 16:25 PORTO 09:50 11:09 12:30 13:05 14:05 16:30 CAMPANHA FAMALICAO --- 11:37 --- --- --- --- BRAGA --- 11:55 --- --- --- --- TROFA --- --- --- --- --- --- SANTO TIRSO --- --- --- --- --- --- VIZELA --- --- --- --- --- --- GUIMARAES --- --- --- --- --- --- Train family: Train number: 129 525 131 133 531 135 Services on bord: Observations: -
Rail Cargo on the Lisbon-Madrid High-Speed Line Rail Cargo on the Lisbon-Madrid High-Speed Rail Line an Assessment of Feasibility
Diana Rita da Silva Leal AN ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY Diana Rita da Silva Leal RAIL CARGO ON THE LISBON-MADRID HIGH-SPEED LINE RAIL CARGO ON THE LISBON-MADRID HIGH-SPEED RAIL LINE AN ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY PhD Thesis in Doctoral Program in Transport Systems supervised by Professor Luís de Picado-Santos and Professor Bruno Filipe Santos, presented to the Department of Civil Engineering of the Faculty of Sciences and Technology of the University of Coimbra March 2015 UniversiDADE DE COIMBRA Diana Rita da Silva Leal RAIL CARGO ON THE LISBON-MADRID HIGH-SPEED RAIL LINE AN ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY PhD Thesis in Doctoral Program in Transport Systems supervised by Professor Luís de Picado-Santos and Professor Bruno Filipe Santos, presented to the Department of Civil Engineering of the Faculty of Sciences and Technology of the University of Coimbra March 2015 [Page Intentionally Left Blank] FINANCIAL SUPPORT Financial Support This research work was financed by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and MIT-Portugal Program through the PhD grant with reference SFRH/BD/42861/2008. The research was also financed by Universidade de Coimbra under the EXPRESS project (MIT/SET/0023/2009). This research has been framed under the Energy for Sustainability Initiative of the University of Coimbra and supported by the R&D Project EMSURE - Energy and Mobility for Sustainable Regions (CENTRO 07 0224 FEDER 002004) V [Page Intentionally Left Blank] VII AGRADECIMENTOS Agradecimentos A elaboração de uma Tese de Doutoramento é uma tarefa individual, ligada a uma determinação, coragem e autoconfiança que muitas vezes parecem desvanecer no árduo caminho percorrido. -
Great Western Zone : TOC Consultation 04
Network Rail EAS - Section 7 Data freeze: EAS_V4_3_2021 HS1 Route Version 4.3 Week 37 Possession RefLOR Possession Possession Blocked Line Protection Start End Traffic Remarks Work Type Location from Location to Type P2020/2940044 SO110 Fawkham Jn Hook Green Up Waterloo BLOCKED To 15/12/20 15/12/20 W2020/6797756 SO400 Connection A/C Electric 0055 Tue 0510 Tue (4 hrs) OHL Work SO460 Down Waterloo Trains 0m0ch and 0m0ch Connection P2020/2955463 SO110 Fawkham Jn Hook Green Up Waterloo BLOCKED To 16/12/20 16/12/20 W2020/7295972 SO400 Connection A/C Electric 0055 Wed 0510 Wed (4 hrs) OHL Work SO460 Down Waterloo Trains 0m0ch and 0m0ch Connection P2020/2940121 SO110 Fawkham Jn Hook Green Up Waterloo BLOCKED To 17/12/20 17/12/20 W2020/6797817 SO400 Connection A/C Electric 0055 Thu 0510 Thu (4 hrs) OHL Work SO460 Down Waterloo Trains 0m0ch and 0m0ch Connection P2020/2939962 EA1320 St. Pancras Dock Jn South Maintenance Sidings 14/12/20 14/12/20 W2020/7258524 LN115 International Siding Possession 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (5 hrs) S&T Work LN3201 0m0ch and 0m0ch SO400 Silo Curve Jn Cedar Jn Silo Curve Protected 14/12/20 14/12/20 Path 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (4 hrs) St. Pancras York Way North Jn East Coast Protected 14/12/20 14/12/20 International Mainline Path 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (4 hrs) Connection York Way North St. Pancras North London Protected 14/12/20 14/12/20 Jn International Incline Path 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (4 hrs) SUPERSEDED BY CPPP Electronic Copy - Uncontrolled when printed Page1 of 143 Network Rail EAS - Section 7 Data freeze: EAS_V4_3_2021 HS1 Route Version -
Data Classification – Track & Civil
Division / Business Unit: Corporate Services & Safety Function: Engineering (Track & Civil) Document Type: Work Instruction Data Classification – Track & Civil EGW-10-04 Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement Internal / External Primary Source EGH-10-03 Data Management Guideline No. 3 – Track & Civil Equipment Document Status Version Date Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved # Reviewed 1.1 08 Sep 20 Assurance Engineer & Stakeholders Manager General Manager Level Crossing Standards Technical Standards Performance Manager 16/09/2020 (Interstate Network) Amendment Record Amendment Date Clause Description of Amendment Version # Reviewed 1.0 27 Feb 19 First issue of Work Instruction 1.1 08 Sep 20 Revision to level crossings including licences EGI and functions descriptions table; Inclusion of Track EGI TR0005 - Track Loops; Adjusted size definition for T&C small culverts undertrack; Added enhanced definition with regards to KM change anomalies; And, detailed method to define gauge variations on track equipment in areas where there are many different tracks with different gauge variations in close proximity. Nameplate details also removed from this document and are now defined in a standalone document EGW- 10-17. © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. -
The Design and Technology of Modern Light Rail Vehicles
MODERN LIGHT RAIL VEHICLES Fit for Purpose? The Design and Technology of Modern Light Rail Vehicles Tony Prescott The objective of this paper is to describe the major technology issues By the 1940s, development of the tram came to a halt in the US and of modern light rail vehicles, not only for the layperson, but also for Britain, once two of the leaders in world tram systems. However, in decision-makers who have to select light rail vehicles for city systems Europe design improvements continued unabated, often using PCC from an array of dazzling and usually superficial publicity for different technology, and a large tram industry thrived, particularly in Germany, the brands and models. It is important to go behind the gloss to see a few former Soviet Union and what is now the Czech Republic. Between 1945 facts more clearly. and the 1990s, the Czechs produced some 23,000 trams, largely based To most people, modern light rail vehicles, also known as trams, are, on face on PCC technology, the former Soviet Union some 15,000 and Germany value, pretty-much standard-design, low-floor articulated rail vehicles that some 8,000. Smaller numbers were developed and/or produced in some epitomise the modern renaissance of trams in city streets. But behind the other countries such as Belgium, Switzerland, Sweden and Poland. By façade of the elegant designs and glossy publicity there is a technological comparison, the few other world countries operating trams during this scenario still being played out, accompanied by a lot of dubious claims, and period, such as Australia and Canada, produced very small numbers using all is not quite as simple and straightforward as it seems. -
'Queasy Rider:' the Failure of the Advanced Passenger Train
‘Queasy Rider:’ The Failure of the Advanced Passenger Train. A dissertation submitted by 0529050 Benjamin Robert Goodwin as part of the requirements for the degree of B.A. with Honours in Medieval and Modern History. February 2006. 1 ‘Queasy Rider:’ The Failure of the Advanced Passenger Train. Contents. Abbreviations and Acronyms………………………………………………3 Introduction………………………………………………………………....4 Chapter One – Technical Problems…………………………………………9 Chapter Two – Inadequate Management…………………………………..23 Chapter Three – The Intervention of the Government and the Media………………………………………………...38 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….52 Appendix…………………………………………………………………...56 Bibliography………………………………………………………………..59 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………...…64 Frontispiece: The prototype APT-P (370001) sits in the yard at the Derby Test Centre, June 1978. Only one half of the train is seen here. Source: BR Publicity Photograph 2 Abbreviations and Acronyms AAPT Advanced American Passenger Train AGT Advanced Ground Transport APT Advanced Passenger Train APT-E Advanced Passenger Train Experimental APT-P Advanced Passenger Train Prototype APT-S Advanced Passenger Train Squadron ASLEF Associated Society of Locomotive Steam Enginemen and Firemen BR British Rail BRB British Rail Board BREL British Rail Engineering Limited CM & EE Chief Mechanical and Electrical Engineer’s Department TGV Train á Grande Vitesse WCML West Coast Mainline 3 Introduction When the Advanced Passenger Train (APT) was immobilised formally in 1987, all three prototype rakes were dismantled save one half set; numbered 370003. Visitors to The Railway Age, Crewe, can now visit this relic. Incongruously, the train that was once described by early enthusiasts as ‘the Concorde of the rails’ is now used to host children’s parties at the aforementioned visitor centre.1 If you’ll excuse the pun, British Rail saw the Advanced Passenger Train Project as a piece of birthday cake, yet it merely ended as the insipid icing. -
Design Data on Suspension Systems of Selected Rail Passenger Cars RR 5931R 5021
Design Data on Suspension U.S. Department Systems of Selected Rail of Transportation Federal Railroad Passenger Cars Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 ~ail Vehicles & lonents NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMS No. 0704-0188 " Public reporting bulden for this collection of infonnation is estimated to average 1 hourper response. including the time for naviewing instructions. sean:hin9 existing data sources. gathering and maintaining the data needed. and completing and naviewing the collection of information. send comments regarding this bulden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information. including suggestions for reducing this bulden. to WashingICn Headquarters services Dinactorata for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway. SUite 1204, Arlington. VA 22202-4302. and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperworlc Reduction Project (07~188). Washington. DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND OATES COVE~EO July 1996 Final Report ~ober1993-December1994 4. TITLE AND SUBnTLE S. FUNDING NUMBERS Design Data on Suspension Systems of Selected Rail Passenger Cars RR 5931R 5021 6. AUTHORS Alan J. Bing. Shaun R. Berry and Hal B. Henderson 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZAnON NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANlZAnON Arthur D. -
K Novel Technologies
Rocky Mountain Rail Authority High‐Speed Rail Feasibility Study Business Plan ‐ Appendices K Novel Technologies A key requirement of this study is that all proposed technologies should be proven and capable of receiving required regulatory approvals within the implementation time scales of the project. The study has assessed proven technology options and their potential speed, focusing on existing technologies that have been proven in actual revenue service. Proposed “Novel” or new technologies that are still under development cannot be considered practical for this study unless they can show that they can be implemented within a 5‐10 year time horizon. This includes meeting FRA/FTA safety regulatory requirements as well as demonstrating the practical capability to commercially operate in the Colorado environment. Accordingly, and consistent with the scope of the I‐70 Draft PEIS, it has focused on rail and Maglev‐based technologies. Various groups have advocated new or “novel” technologies for potential application to the Colorado corridors. However, the RMRA funding grant from the Colorado Department of Transportation specifically excluded detailed consideration of “novel” technologies from this study, restricting application of funds only to proven technologies: 1. The CDOT Transportation Commission Resolution Restricting Front Range Commuter Rail Study passed 6 to 1 in November 2006. 2. DMU, EMU, Diesel Locomotive Hauled or Magnetic Levitation are the only technologies allowed by the Transportation Commission because of work done previously in I‐70 Draft PEIS. Per this direction from the RMRA and CDOT, “novel” technologies cannot be evaluated at the same level as “proven” technologies. Nonetheless, a survey was conducted that includes novel technologies so we can understand their development potential for possible long‐run implementation. -
High Speed Passenger Rail Corridor Conference
'I·. > High Speed Passenger Rail Corridor Conference U.S. Departme11t Federal Railroad of Transportation Administration March 26 & 27, 1996 Washington, DC Table: fpf Q Program Agenda List of Attendees FY 1997 Budget Request HSGT Outreach Overview Status Of State Programs 0 HSGT Safety And Research And Development Section 1010/1036 Grade Crossing Program Next Generation High-Speed Rail Technology Development Program High Speed Ground Transportation (HSGT) Planning Funds Notice 0 Railroad Safety Program WGB SPEED PASSENGER RAU, CORRIDOR CONFERENCE March 26 & 27, 1996 , FRA&FHWA Room 2230, NASSIF Building Tuesday. March 26 o Purpose of the Conference o 1997 Budget Request o HSGT Commercial Feasibility Study I HSGT Policy Status o Next Generation Program - Status o Description of Corridor Plan o Status of Improvements o Funding Strategy o Legislative Authority/Needs (DOT/PUC) e.g. Private Grade Crossings o Discussion III. BREAK- 15 minutes IV. STAIE BY STAIE STATUS REPORT (Contd.) 10:30 a.m. to 11: 15 a.m. VII Lunch Break - 12 to 1 p.m. 2 o Passenger Rail Equipment o Other Safety Requirements for HSGT o HSGT Safety R&D - Orth o Questions and Answers IX. BREAK - 15 Minutes o Overview - Smailes o HSGT Grade Crossing Issues o FHWA Program - Louick/Winans XI. BREAK - 15 Minutes o Next Generation Technology Development o Questions and Answers Wednesdqy. March 2 7 o HSGT Commercial Feasibility Study/National Policy - Mongini o State Infrastructure Banks - Program Status/Applications - J. Basso o Innovative Financing Projects - Cooper o IS TEA Reauthorization - Cooper XIV. BREAK 15 Minutes XV. ROUND TABLE· HSGT FUNDING (Contd.) 9:45 a.m.