DOCSLIB.ORG

141 Unpublished Sources and Primary Documents Chadwick

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
141 Unpublished Sources and Primary Documents Chadwick Britain and the atomic bomb: MAUD to Nagasaki. Item Type Thesis Authors Gorman, Claire L. Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 28/09/2021 18:33:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4332 Bibliography: Unpublished Sources and Primary Documents Chadwick Papers CHAD 1/12/2, Minutes of MAUD Technical Committee 9/4/41, Churchill Archives Centre (henceforth CAC) CHAD 1/19/8, Letter from Francis Simon to James Chadwick, 19/9/41, CAC CHAD 1/19/8, Letter from Pye to James Chadwick, 19/9/1941, CAC CHAD 1/19/8, Letter from Pye to James Chadwick, 16/10/41, CAC CHAD 1/19/8, Letter from Francis Simon to James Chadwick, 20/1/43, CAC CHAD 1/28/2, Relations between American and British S1 Project, CAC CHAD 1/29/2, General Policy on atomic Energy, British scientific office, 2/1/43, CAC CHAD 1/28/6, Notes of a meeting at Liverpool University, 30/6/40, CAC CHAD 1/28/6, MAUD Report on Uranium as an explosive, CAC CHAD 1/28/6, MAUD Committee Report on Uranium Fission, 26/8/41, CAC CHAD 1/30/3, 4TH Meeting of Tube Alloys Technical Committee, 23/4/42, CAC CHAD 1/30/3, 11TH Meeting of Tube Alloys Technical Committee, 13/11/42, CAC CHAD 1/30/3, 12TH Meeting of Tube Alloys Technical Committee, 11/12/42, CAC CHAD 4/4/4, French Members of Montreal staff, 31/1/45, CAC CHAD 4/4/4, Preserving Security over the French scientists working on the Canadian Project, 20/1/45, CAC CHAD 4/4/4, James Chadwick to Mackenzie King, CAC CHAD 4/6/1, Meeting of the Combined Policy Committee, 22/1/45, CAC CHAD 4/6/29, Statement on sentence passed on Dr. Alan Nunn May, 1946, CAC CHAD 4/8/1, Sources of Uranium, CAC Cockcroft Papers CKFT 10/1, Letter from Mark Oliphant to John Cockcroft, 6/7/40, CAC CKFT 10/1, Report on telegram of 9/5/40 received by Cockcroft, CAC 141 Thomson papers TMSN 3, A Report on Uranium Fusion, CAC TMSN 4, Letter from Hans Halban to G P Thomson, June 1940, CAC TMSN 4, Letter from John Cockcroft to Dr. Fowler, 4/1/40, CAC TMSN 7, Notes of meetings and discussions of the United States MAUD Committee, CAC The National Archives, Kew AB 1/38, Personnel - Sir George Thomson‟s Committee – Staff for Tube Alloy in U.S.A and Canada AB 1/91, Heavy water from Norsk Hydro electrisk kvaelstoff aktieselscab, 1945 AB 1/93, Progress reports Cambridge University (Feather and Bretscher), 1941-1945 AB 1/106, Lord Cherwell‟s papers – Miscellaneous notes and reports of Uranium projects, 1940- 1941 AB 1/170, Lord Cherwell’s Minute to the P.M. re use of Atomic Energy for bomb, 1941 AB 1/368, Tube Alloys: Technical Committee Correspondence, 1941-1945 AB 1/451, Tube Alloys: Technical Committee; meeting of 19th September 1943 AB 1/543, Progress reports, Birmingham University, Professor R Peierls, 1941-1944 AB 1/568, Letters to Sir James Chadwick from Professor Peierls and Dr. Moon at Los Alamos AB 1/573, Professor R.E Peierls personal papers: correspondence with Akers, Arms, Blackman, Blok, Born, Brown, 1942-1944 AB 1/575, Professor R.E Peierls Personal Papers: correspondence with Feather, Fowler, Frisch, Fuchs etc, 1943-1944 AB 1/577, Professor R.E Peierls Personal Papers: correspondence with Placzek, Simon etc, 1942- 1944 AB 1/585, Quebec Agreement 1943; Lord President negotiations, 1942-1945 AB 1/638, Professor R.E Peierls personal papers, 1941 AB 1/695, Michael W. Perrin interviews with Dr. Klaus Fuchs following his arrest for espionage, January to March 1950 142 AB 1/700, Tube Alloy Project; organisation of an independent British and Anglo-Canadian effort, 1st January 1943-31st December 1943 AB 3/86, Notes on tour of United States and Canada, August-October 1943: Peierls and others, 1943 AB 3/90, Rudolf Peierls correspondence with Simon, Arms, Kurti etc, 1942 AB 3/91, Rudolf Peierls correspondence with Simon, Arms, Kurti etc, 1942 AB 3/101, Clarendon Laboratory diffusion papers: Simon’s correspondence with Kearton, Appleton etc, 1942-1943 AB 3/102, Clarendon Laboratory diffusion papers: Simon’s correspondence with Kearton, Appleton etc, 1942 AB 3/110, Tube Alloys correspondence with Simon and Akers in the United Kingdom and United States, 1942-1945 AB 4/130, Radioactive Poisons, August 1942 AB 4/39, Interim Report on the progress and programme concerning the fast neutron reaction, Author(s) K. Fuchs, R. Peierls, c.1942 AB 6/641, Visit to U.S and Canada by Sir John Cockcroft, 1949 AIR 8/1767, Vemork, Norway: SOE attack on heavy water plant, 1943 CAB 98/47, Tube Alloys Consultative Council, 1941-1945 CAB 126/146, Decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan, 29th March 1944-31st March 1947 CAB 126/171, Heavy water (deuterium oxide): general file. Includes report of operations against the Norsk Hydro plant at Vemork in Norway and return of heavy water to Professor Joliot- Curie, 19th November 1942-8th August 1954 CAB 126/183, The Hyde Park Memorandum, Sept. 1944 (agreement between President Roosevelt and Mr. Churchill on control and use of the atomic bomb) Provision of a copy for the U.S archives, 25th March 1945-17th February 1947 CAB 126/209, Reactions of scientists to the atomic bomb: Atomic Scientists Association, 29th May 1946-9th April 1948 CAB 127/18, Correspondence with Lord Cherwell and others on Bacteriological warfare, August 1941- April 1944 FO 371/81734, Interrogation of Dr. Fuchs by the FBI: United States request to be allowed to interrogate Dr. Fuchs in prison; United Kingdom agreement subject to certain conditions, 1950 143 FO 371/82902, Arrest and conviction of Dr. Fuchs on charges of spying for Russia; American reactions; copies of confessions for U.S.A and Canada; security clearances of Mr Eaton and his staff, 1950 FO 371/82903, Arrest and conviction of Dr. Fuchs on charges of spying for Russia; American reactions; copies of confessions for U.S.A and Canada; security clearances of Mr Eaton and his staff, 1950 FO 371/93222, Anglo-U.S discussions on ways to combat atomic security leaks following the cases of Pontecorvo, Fuchs, Professor Infeld and Dr. Burhop, 1951 FO 371/93223, Anglo-U.S discussions on ways to combat atomic security leaks following the cases of Pontecorvo, Fuchs, Professor Infeld and Dr. Burhop, 1951 FO 954/9A, France: President to Prime Minister, No. 649, French Provisional Government should not take part in next Big Three Conference, 19/11/44 KV 2/1245, Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs: German/British, Security Service file, 1st January 1938- 31st December 1949 KV 2/1246, Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs: German/British, Security Service file, 1st January 1949- 31st December 1949 KV 2/1247, Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs: German/British, Security Service file, 1st January 1949- 31st December 1949 KV 2/1259, Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs: German/British, Security Service file, 1st January 1952- 31st December 1953 KV 2/1270, Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs: German/British, Security Service file, 1st January 1950- 31st December 1950 KV 2/2209, Alan Nunn May: British. Security Service file, 1st January 1937-31st December 1945 KV 2/2226, Alan Nunn May: British. Security Service file, 1st January 45-31st December 1951 KV 2/2421, Otto Robert Frisch: British. Security Service file, 1st January 1940-31st December 1954 KV 2/2422, Hans Heinrich Halban: French. Security Service file, 1st January 1944-31st December 1955 KV 2/2589, Lew Kowarski: French. Special Branch note 29/4/48, Security Service file, 1st January 1940-31st December 1950 144 KV 2/2589, Lew Kowarski. French. Departure 45a, 22/1/47, Security Service file, 1st January 1940-31st December 1950 KV 2/2590, Lew Kowarski: French. Security Service file, 1st January 1940-31st December 1952 KV 2/2591, Lew Kowarski: French. Security Service file, 1st January 1952-31st December 1955 KV 2/2592, Jules Gueron: French. Security Service file, 1st January 1940-31st December 1953 PREM 3/139/2, Tube Alloys Declaration of Trust, March-June 1944 PREM 3/139/4, Tube Alloys: Operation against heavy water plant in Norway, May 1945 PREM 3/139/11B, Tube Alloys, 1944 PREM 8/1279, Exposure of Dr. Klaus Fuchs: correspondence with the Security Service Published Secondary Sources Books Alperovitz, G Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam, London, Secker and Warburg, 1966 Alperovitz, G The decision to use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth, London, Fontana, 1996 Bernstein, J Hitler’s Uranium Club: The Secret Recordings at Farm Hall, New York, American Institute of Physics, 1996 Bertin, L Atom Harvest, London, Secker and Warburg, 1955 Bickel, L The Deadly Element: The Story of Uranium, London, Macmillan, 1980 Bird, K and Sherwin, M. J American Prometheus: the triumph and tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer, New York, Vintage Books, 2006 Blackett, P. M. S Political and Military Consequences of Atomic Energy, London, Turnstile Press, 1948 Blake, R and Louis, W R (Ed.) Churchill, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993 Brown, A The Neutron and the Bomb: An Autobiography of Sir James Chadwick, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997 Burchett, W Shadows of Hiroshima, London, Verso, 1983 Byrnes, J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prehistory of CERN: the First Suggestions (1949-Jun 1950)
    CHS-3 March 1984 STUDIES IN CERN HISTORY Prehistory of CERN : the first suggestions (1949 - June 1950) Dominique Pestre GENEVA 1984 The Study of CERN History is a project financed by Institutions in several CERN Member Countries. This report presents preliminary findings. and is intended for incorporation into a more comprehensive study of CERN's history. It is distributed primarily to historians and scientists to provoke discussion, and no part of it should be cited or reproduced without written permission from the Team Leacier. Comments are welcome and should be sent to: Study Team for CERN History c/oCERN CH-1211 GENEVE23 Switzerland © Copyright Study Team for CERN History, Geneva 1984 CERN-Service d'information scientifique - 300 - mars 1984 PREHISTORY OF CERN THE FIRST SUGGESTIONS (1949 - June 1950) I The years following the war II Two proposals of European collaboration in November 1949 III The European Cultural Conference, Lausanne, December 8-12, 1949 IV Attempts to implement the suggestions a - The European Movement initiative b - The French attempts V The fifth General Conference of UNESCO, Florence, June 1950 PREHISTORY OF CERN: THE FIRST SUGGESTIONS (1949-June 1950) 1 The official date of the foundation of CERN is easily established. The convention setting up CERN, signed on July 1, 1953 was ratified by France and Germany on September 29, 1954. By then nine States had signed, and CERN came officially into being. However, the interest of this date is rather limited. It ended a process initiated several years before and understanding this process is far more interesting than having a date of birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Des Origines Du Programme Nucléaire Français À Nos Jours
    Résistance et Dissuasion Des originesRésistance du programme et nucléaire Dissuasion français à nos jours Des originesRésistance du programme et nucléaire Dissuasion français à nos jours Des origines du programme nucléaire français à nos jours EXPOSITION Résistance et Dissuasion Des origines du programme nucléaire français à nos jours © D.R. – ECPAD/Défense / Archives historiques CEA / Archives © D.R. – ECPAD/Défense Résistance et Dissuasion Des origines du programme nucléaire français à nos jours LE RÔLE PIONNIER DE LA FRANCE DANS LE DOMAINE DE L’éNERGIE NUCLÉAIRE De la découverte de la radioactivité naturelle à celle de la radioactivité artificielle Extrait du discours de réception du prix Nobel de physique, le 6 juin 1905, par Pierre Curie « (…) On peut concevoir encore que dans des mains criminelles le radium puisse devenir très dangereux, ès la fin du XIXe siècle, la France exerce un rôle majeur dans la Ci-dessus : Henri Becquerel dans son laboratoire, 1903 – D.R. et ici on peut se demander si l’humanité a avantage découverte de l’énergie atomique. C’est ainsi que le physicien Henri à connaître les secrets de la nature, si elle est mûre Becquerel découvre en 1896 le rayonnement émis par les sels À gauche : Pierre et Marie Curie dans leur laboratoire, vers 1898 pour en profiter ou si cette connaissance ne lui sera D Musée Curie (coll. ACJC) d’uranium ; c’est une découverte considérable car il vient de mettre en pas nuisible. Ci-dessous : Frédéric Joliot et Irène Curie dans leur laboratoire, évidence le phénomène de la radioactivité naturelle. L’étape suivante vers 1934 – Musée Curie (coll.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RADAR WAR Forward
    THE RADAR WAR by Gerhard Hepcke Translated into English by Hannah Liebmann Forward The backbone of any military operation is the Army. However for an international war, a Navy is essential for the security of the sea and for the resupply of land operations. Both services can only be successful if the Air Force has control over the skies in the areas in which they operate. In the WWI the Air Force had a minor role. Telecommunications was developed during this time and in a few cases it played a decisive role. In WWII radar was able to find and locate the enemy and navigation systems existed that allowed aircraft to operate over friendly and enemy territory without visual aids over long range. This development took place at a breath taking speed from the Ultra High Frequency, UHF to the centimeter wave length. The decisive advantage and superiority for the Air Force or the Navy depended on who had the better radar and UHF technology. 0.0 Aviation Radio and Radar Technology Before World War II From the very beginning radar technology was of great importance for aviation. In spite of this fact, the radar equipment of airplanes before World War II was rather modest compared with the progress achieved during the war. 1.0 Long-Wave to Short-Wave Radiotelegraphy In the beginning, when communication took place only via telegraphy, long- and short-wave transmitting and receiving radios were used. 2.0 VHF Radiotelephony Later VHF radios were added, which made communication without trained radio operators possible. 3.0 On-Board Direction Finding A loop antenna served as a navigational aid for airplanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4. CLASSIFICATION UNDER the ATOMIC ENERGY
    Chapter 4 CLASSIFICATION UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT INTRODUCTION The Atomic Energy Act of 1946 was the first and, other than its successor, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, to date the only U.S. statute to establish a program to restrict the dissemination of information. This Act transferred control of all aspects of atomic (nuclear) energy from the Army, which had managed the government’s World War II Manhattan Project to produce atomic bombs, to a five-member civilian Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). These new types of bombs, of awesome power, had been developed under stringent secrecy and security conditions. Congress, in enacting the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, continued the Manhattan Project’s comprehensive, rigid controls on U.S. information about atomic bombs and other aspects of atomic energy. That Atomic Energy Act designated the atomic energy information to be protected as “Restricted Data” and defined that data. Two types of atomic energy information were defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Restricted Data (RD) and a type that was subsequently termed Formerly Restricted Data (FRD). Before discussing further the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 and its unique requirements for controlling atomic energy information, some of the special information-control activities that accompanied the research, development, and production efforts that led to the first atomic bomb will be mentioned. Realization that an atomic bomb was possible had a profound impact on the scientists who first became aware of that possibility. The implications of such a weapon were so tremendous that the U.S. scientists conducting the initial, basic research related to nuclear fission voluntarily restricted the publication of their scientific work in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • HEAVY WATER and NONPROLIFERATION Topical Report
    HEAVY WATER AND NONPROLIFERATION Topical Report by MARVIN M. MILLER MIT Energy Laboratory Report No. MIT-EL 80-009 May 1980 COO-4571-6 MIT-EL 80-009 HEAVY WATER AND NONPROLIFERATION Topical Report Marvin M. Miller Energy Laboratory and Department of Nuclear Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 May 1980 Prepared For THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UNDER CONTRACT NO. EN-77-S-02-4571.A000 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or useful- ness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. A B S T R A C T The following report is a study of various aspects of the relationship between heavy water and the development of the civilian and military uses of atomic energy. It begins with a historical sketch which traces the heavy water storyfrom its discovery by Harold Urey in 1932 through its coming of age from scientific curiosity to strategic nuclear material at the eve of World War II and finally into the post-war period, where the military and civilian strands have some- times seemed inextricably entangled. The report next assesses the nonproliferation implications of the use of heavy water- moderated power reactors; several different reactor types are discussed, but the focus in on the natural uranium, on- power fueled, pressure tube reactor developed in Canada, the CANDU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists, Statesmen and War: the Case of the Scientific Advisory Committee
    James Goodchild Ex Historia 46 James Goodchild 1 University of Exeter Scientists, Statesmen and War: The Case of the Scientific Advisory Committee. The now extensive historiography of the Second World War confirms with fascinating certainty that twentieth-century total technological warfare forced developed nation states to marry their statesmen to their scientists. While the long-term marriage itself proved a near cataclysmic affair, the wedding too had many moments of turbulence. This article examines one particular event in twentieth-century British history of scientific and technological institutionalisation. Piecing together previously unconnected primary evidence, this article re-interprets the uneasy beginnings of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) to the War Cabinet established in October 1940. This article further demonstrates that even in an emergency so immense as modern war, science and politics continued to remain as awkward bedfellows. It was during the First World War that the British Government began to appreciate the value of a permanent civil partnership developing between scientists and the state. From the high pinnacles of David Lloyd George’s ‘Garden Suburbs’ – ideas men attached to the Cabinet – down to the nitty-gritty of keeping common men alive through the work of the Medical Research Committee, science began to permeate the Whitehall corridors of power in an unprecedented fashion essentially as a consequence of total war. 2 This scientific incursion was 1 James Goodchild’s ([email protected] ) academic interests are the inter-relations between twentieth-century war, science and technology, and the British state and society. He holds a BA (Hons.) in history and an M.Res (distinction) which specialised in the scientific developments of the Great War.
    [Show full text]
  • Lew Kowarski
    Lew Kowarski 1907-1979 Avant-propos ~~~'\ John B. Adams Les textes publies dans le present document sont ceux directeur de son Departement des sciences naturelles. des allocutions prononcees !ors d'une reunion a la me­ Denis de Rougemont, comme Lew Kowarski, a done pris moire de Lew Kowarski, qui s'est tenue au CERN a une grande part a la creation du CERN et s'est trouve en Geneve le 20 decembre 1979. contact avec Kowarski, tant a ce moment-la que pendant Ces allocutions couvrent les differentes phases de la vie Jes annees ou ce dernier a travaille au CERN. Leurs rela­ et de !'oeuvre de Lew Kowarski, et chaque orateur s'est tions se resserrerent encore apres que Kowarski eut pris sa trouve en association etroite avec lui a differentes epoques retraite. de sa carriere. Jean Mussard a egalement concouru a la creation du Jules Gueron a rencontre Kowarski avant la seconde CERN car, a l'epoque ou !'UNESCO entreprenait d'ela­ guerre mondiale alors qu'il travaillait au laboratoire de borer le projet d'un Laboratoire europeen de physique Joliot a Paris. Ensemble, ils entrerent a «Tube Alloys», nucleaire, ii etait directeur adjoint de la Division pour la nom de code pour le projet d'energie nucleaire en Angle­ cooperation scientifique internationale a l'UNESCO et terre, et se rendirent au Canada quand ce projet y fut Pierre Auger le chargea de cette elaboration. C'est ainsi transfere en 1943. Apres la guerre, tous deux devinrent qu'il entra en contact avec Lew Kowarski et ii resta en directeurs au CEA, en France, puis leurs itineraires se rapport etroit avec lui jusqu'au deces de celui-ci.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Americans the 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park
    United States Cryptologic History The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park Special series | Volume 12 | 2016 Center for Cryptologic History David J. Sherman is Associate Director for Policy and Records at the National Security Agency. A graduate of Duke University, he holds a doctorate in Slavic Studies from Cornell University, where he taught for three years. He also is a graduate of the CAPSTONE General/Flag Officer Course at the National Defense University, the Intelligence Community Senior Leadership Program, and the Alexander S. Pushkin Institute of the Russian Language in Moscow. He has served as Associate Dean for Academic Programs at the National War College and while there taught courses on strategy, inter- national relations, and intelligence. Among his other government assignments include ones as NSA’s representative to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council, and on the staff of the National Economic Council. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: (Top) Navy Department building, with Washington Monument in center distance, 1918 or 1919; (bottom) Bletchley Park mansion, headquarters of UK codebreaking, 1939 UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park David Sherman National Security Agency Center for Cryptologic History 2016 Second Printing Contents Foreword ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Technology 101 for Policy Wonks Bruce T
    NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY FOR POLICY WONKS NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS BRUCE T. GOODWIN BRUCE T. GOODWIN BRUCE T. Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 2021 NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS BRUCE T. GOODWIN Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 2021 NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-11-3 LCCN-2021907474 LLNL-MI-823628 TID-61681 2 | BRUCE T. GOODWIN Table of Contents About the Author. 2 Introduction . .3 The Revolution in Physics That Led to the Bomb . 4 The Nuclear Arms Race Begins. 6 Fission and Fusion are "Natural" Processes . 7 The Basics of the Operation of Nuclear Explosives. 8 The Atom . .9 Isotopes . .9 Half-life . 10 Fission . 10 Chain Reaction . 11 Critical Mass . 11 Fusion . 14 Types of Nuclear Weapons . 16 Finally, How Nuclear Weapons Work . 19 Fission Explosives . 19 Fusion Explosives . 22 Staged Thermonuclear Explosives: the H-bomb . 23 The Modern, Miniature Hydrogen Bomb . 25 Intrinsically Safe Nuclear Weapons . 32 Underground Testing . 35 The End of Nuclear Testing and the Advent of Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship . 39 Stockpile Stewardship Today . 41 Appendix 1: The Nuclear Weapons Complex .
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation
    3 HISTORIC BARRIERS TO ANGLO- AMERICAN NUCLEAR COOPERATION ANDREW BROWN Despite being the closest of allies, with shared values and language, at- tempts by the United Kingdom and the United States to reach accords on nuclear matters generated distrust and resentment but no durable arrangements until the Mutual Defense Agreement of 1958. There were times when the perceived national interests of the two countries were unsynchronized or at odds; periods when political leaders did not see eye to eye or made secret agreements that remained just that; and when espionage, propaganda, and public opinion caused addi- tional tensions. STATUS IMBALANCE The Magna Carta of the nuclear age is the two-part Frisch-Peierls mem- orandum. It was produced by two European émigrés, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls, at Birmingham University in the spring of 1940. Un- like Einstein’s famous letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with its vague warning that a powerful new bomb might be constructed from uranium, the Frisch-Peierls memorandum set out detailed technical arguments leading to the conclusion that “a moderate amount of U-235 [highly enriched uranium] would indeed constitute an extremely effi- cient explosive.” Like Einstein, Frisch and Peierls were worried that the Germans might already be working toward an atomic bomb against which there would be no defense. By suggesting “a counter-threat with a similar bomb,” they first enunciated the concept of mutual deterrence and recommended “start[ing] production as soon as possible, even if 36 Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation 37 it is not intended to use the bomb as a means of attack.”1 Professor Mark Oliphant from Birmingham convinced the UK authorities that “the whole thing must be taken rather seriously,”2 and a small group of senior scientists came together as the Maud Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • M-1392 Publication Title: Bush-Conant File
    Publication Number: M-1392 Publication Title: Bush-Conant File Relating to the Development of the Atomic Bomb, 1940-1945 Date Published: n.d. BUSH-CONANT FILE RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ATOMIC BOMB, 1940-1945 The Bush-Conant File, reproduced on the 14 rolls of this microfilm publication, M1392, documents the research and development of the atomic bomb from 1940 to 1945. These records were maintained in Dr. James B. Conant's office for himself and Dr. Vannevar Bush. Bush was director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD, 1941-46), chairman of the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) prior to the establishment of OSRD (1940-41), chairman of the Military Policy Committee (1942-45) and member of the Interim Committee (May-June 1945). During this period Conant served under Bush as chairman of the National Defense Research Committee of OSRD (1941-46), chairman of the S-1 Executive Committee (1942-43), alternate chairman of the Military Policy Committee (1942-45), scientific advisor to Maj. Gen. Leslie R. Groves (1943-45), and member of the Interim Committee (May-June 1945). The file, which consists primarily of letters, memorandums, and reports, is part of the Records of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, Record Group (RG) 227. The Bush-Conant File documents OSRD's role in promoting basic scientific research and development on nuclear fission before August 1942. In addition, the files document Bush and Conant's continuing roles, as chairman and alternate chairman of the Military Policy Committee, in overseeing the army's development of the atomic bomb during World War II and, as members of the short-lived Interim Committee, in advising on foreign policy and domestic legislation for the regulation of atomic energy immediately after the war.
    [Show full text]