DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Index of Keys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Index of Keys Draft Index of Keys This document will be an update of the taxonomic references contained within Hawking 20001 which can still be purchased from MDFRC on (02) 6024 9650 or [email protected]. We have made the descision to make this draft version publicly available so that other taxonomy end-users may have access to the information during the refining process and also to encourage comment on the usability of the keys referred to or provide information on other keys that have not been reffered to. Please email all comments to [email protected]. 1Hawking, J.H. (2000) A preliminary guide to keys and zoological information to identify invertebrates form Australian freshwaters. Identification Guide No. 2 (2nd Edition), Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology: Albury Index of Keys Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Major Group ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Minor Group ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Order .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Family ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Notations .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Citation ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Where to start ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Acarina .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Astigmata: Histiostomatidae: Histiostoma ..................................................................................................... 9 Halacaroidea .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Halacaridae ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Pezidae: Peza ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Hydracarina .................................................................................................................................................... 9 *Mesostigmata : Ascidae ............................................................................................................................... 9 Oribatida ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 *Trombidioidea : Trombidiidae ....................................................................................................................... 9 Aphanoneura: Aeolosomatidae: Aeolosma ............................................................................................ 9 Bivalvia ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Unionoida: Hyriidae ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Veneroida ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Corbiculidae ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Sphaeriidae .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Bryozoa ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Cnidaria ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Hydrozoa ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Australomedusidae ................................................................................................................................... 10 Clavidae .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Hydridae ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Olindiidae .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Collembola ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Dicyrtomidae ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Hypogastruridae ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Isotomidae ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Neelidae ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Katiannidae ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Sminthuridae ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Sminthurididae .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Crustacea ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Draft_Index_of_Keys_MDFRC_v4-2012 Page 2 of 35 Version date: 8/10/2012 Index of Keys Anostraca ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Branchiura: Argulidae .................................................................................................................................. 11 Cladocera ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Conchostraca ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Copepoda ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Malacostra .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Amphipoda ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Anaspidacea ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Bathynellacea ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Decapoda ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Isopoda ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Phreatoicidea ............................................................................................................................................ 13 Spelaeogriphacea: Spelaeogriphidae: Mangkurtu ................................................................................... 14 Tanaidacea: Paraseudidae: Pseudohalmyrapseudes .............................................................................. 14 Thermosbaenacea: Halosbaenidae: Halosbaena tulki Poore & Humphreys ........................................... 14 Notostraca: Triopsidae ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Specimens from the Past to Understand the Living World Through Digitization
    Using specimens from the past to understand the living world through digitization Drs. Jessica L. Ware, William Kuhn, Dirk Gassmann and John Abbott Rutgers University, Newark Dragonflies: Order Odonata Suborders Anisoptera (unequal wings): Dragonflies ~3000 species Anisozygoptera ~3 species Zygoptera: Damselflies ~3000 species Perchers, Fliers, Migrators, & Homebodies Dragonfly flight Wing venation affects wing camber, lift, and ultimately flight patterns Dragonfly flight Stiffness varies along length of the wing with vein density and thickness Dragonfly flight Certain wing traits are correlated with specific flight styles Dragonfly collections: invaluable treasures Collection name # spp. #specimens Florida State Collection 2728 150K Ware Lab Collection 373 4K Smithsonian Collection 253 200K M.L. May Collection 300 10K Dragonfly collections: invaluable treasures Harness information in collections Targeted Odonata Wing Digitization (TOWD) project TOWD project scanning protocol TOWD project scanning protocol TOWD project TOWD project TOWD project 10 10 TOWD project More information at: https://willkuhn.github.io/towd/ Aspect ratios: How elongate is the wing compared to its overall area? • High Aspect ratio Low Aspect ratio Long narrow wings, Wing Short broad wings, optimized for: Wing optimized long-distance flight for: Maneuverability, turning High Aspect Low Aspect Ratio Ratio More data on aspect ratios, better interpretations? 2007: Hand measured forewings of 85 specimens, 7 months work More data on apsect ratios, better interpretations? 2007: Hand measured forewings of 85 specimens, 7 months 2019: Odomatic measurements for 206 work specimens, 2-3 minutes of work! Are there differences in aspect ratios? Perchers have significantly lower aspect ratios than fliers. The p-value is .001819. The result is significant at p < .05.
    [Show full text]
  • [The Pond\. Odonatoptera (Odonata)]
    Odonatological Abstracts 1987 1993 (15761) SAIKI, M.K. &T.P. LOWE, 1987. Selenium (15763) ARNOLD, A., 1993. Die Libellen (Odonata) in aquatic organisms from subsurface agricultur- der “Papitzer Lehmlachen” im NSG Luppeaue bei al drainagewater, San JoaquinValley, California. Leipzig. Verbff. NaturkMus. Leipzig 11; 27-34. - Archs emir. Contam. Toxicol. 16: 657-670. — (US (Zur schonen Aussicht 25, D-04435 Schkeuditz). Fish & Wildl. Serv., Natn. Fisheries Contaminant The locality is situated 10km NW of the city centre Res. Cent., Field Res, Stn, 6924 Tremont Rd, Dixon, of Leipzig, E Germany (alt, 97 m). An annotated CA 95620, USA). list is presented of 30 spp., evidenced during 1985- Concentrations of total selenium were investigated -1993. in plant and animal samplesfrom Kesterson Reser- voir, receiving agricultural drainage water (Merced (15764) BEKUZIN, A.A., 1993. Otryad Strekozy - — Co.) and, as a reference, from the Volta Wildlife Odonatoptera(Odonata). [OrderDragonflies — km of which Area, ca 10 S Kesterson, has high qual- Odonatoptera(Odonata)].Insectsof Uzbekistan , pp. ity irrigationwater. Overall,selenium concentrations 19-22,Fan, Tashkent, (Russ.). - (Author’s address in samples from Kesterson averaged about 100-fold unknown). than those from Volta. in and A rather 20 of higher Thus, May general text, mentioning (out 76) spp. Aug. 1983, the concentrations (pg/g dry weight) at No locality data, but some notes on their habitats Kesterson in larval had of 160- and vertical in Central Asia. Zygoptera a range occurrence 220 and in Anisoptera 50-160. In Volta,these values were 1.2-2.I and 1.1-2.5, respectively. In compari- (15765) GAO, Zhaoning, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with Descriptions of Two New Genera and Eight New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 219: The11–61 freshwater (2012) snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with descriptions of two new genera... 11 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.219.3406 RESEARCH articLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The freshwater snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with descriptions of two new genera and eight new species Peter Glöer1,†, Vladimir Pešić2,‡ 1 Biodiversity Research Laboratory, Schulstraße 3, D-25491 Hetlingen, Germany 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8CB6BA7C-D04E-4586-BA1D-72FAFF54C4C9 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:719843C2-B25C-4F8B-A063-946F53CB6327 Corresponding author: Vladimir Pešić ([email protected]) Academic editor: Eike Neubert | Received 18 May 2012 | Accepted 24 August 2012 | Published 4 September 2012 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35A0EBEF-8157-40B5-BE49-9DBD7B273918 Citation: Glöer P, Pešić V (2012) The freshwater snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with descriptions of two new genera and eight new species. ZooKeys 219: 11–61. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.219.3406 Abstract Using published records and original data from recent field work and revision of Iranian material of cer- tain species deposited in the collections of the Natural History Museum Basel, the Zoological Museum Berlin, and Natural History Museum Vienna, a checklist of the freshwater gastropod fauna of Iran was compiled. This checklist contains 73 species from 34 genera and 14 families of freshwater snails; 27 of these species (37%) are endemic to Iran. Two new genera, Kaskakia and Sarkhia, and eight species, i.e., Bithynia forcarti, B. starmuehlneri, B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine of the British Dragonfly Society Spring 2013 Favourite Days 30Th Anniversary Stamp Issue
    Dragonfly 63 NewsThe Magazine of the British Dragonfly Society Spring 2013 www.british-dragonflies.org.uk Favourite Days 30th Anniversary stamp issue Observations On the Trail of the Orange-spotted Emerald Dragonfly News 63 The Magazine of the British Dragonfly Society Published twice a year, in April and October, Dragonfly News covers all aspects of the British Dragonfly Society’s field, recording, monitoring, research, conservation and social activities, as well as information from the wider dragonfly, natural history and conservation world. The emphasis is on dragonflies recorded in the UK. *The British Dragonfly Society aims to promote and encourage the study, conservation and understanding of dragonflies and their natural habitats, especially in the UK, and to raise public awareness of dragonflies. Dragonfly News is edited & designed by: Trustees & Officers of the BDS Mark Tyrrell, 8 Warwick Close, Raunds, Chairman: Pam Taylor, Decoy Farm, Decoy Road, Potter Northants., NN9 6JH Tel. Heigham, Norfolk, NR29 5LX. Tel. e-mail: Vice-Chairman: Vacant Deadlines for inclusion of copy: Secretary: Henry Curry, 23 Bowker Way, Whittlesey, Spring 31 January Peterborough, PE7 1PY. Tel. Autumn 31 July Treasurer: Brian Walker, 49 Roman Way, Wantage, Advertising Rates: Oxfordshire, OX12 9YF. Tel. £15 for small-ad (text only); £40 for quarter- Trustees: Andy Harmer, Alan Nelson, *Mick Parfitt. page; £60 for half-page; £100 for full-page. Journal Editor: Peter Mill, 8 Cookridge Grove, LEEDS, LS16 7LH. © British Dragonfly Society 2013 Shop Manager: Lynn Curry, 23 Bowker Way, Whittlesey, All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Peterborough, PE7 1PY Tel. reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission of the British Dragonfly Conservation Group (DCG) Dragonfly Society or the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Sampling Manual 2018
    Monitoring and Sampling Manual Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 Prepared by: Water Quality and Investigation, Department of Environment and Science (DES) © State of Queensland, 2018. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. Citation DES. 2018. Monitoring and Sampling Manual: Environmental Protection (Water) Policy. Brisbane: Department of Environment and Science Government. Acknowledgements The revision and update of this manual was led by Dr Suzanne Vardy, with the valued assistance of Dr Phillipa Uwins, Leigh Anderson and Brenda Baddiley. Thanks are given to many experts who reviewed and contributed to the documents relating to their field of expertise. This includes government staff from within the Department of Environment and Science, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and many from outside government.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination of Cultivated Plants in the Tropics 111 Rrun.-Co Lcfcnow!Cdgmencle
    ISSN 1010-1365 0 AGRICULTURAL Pollination of SERVICES cultivated plants BUL IN in the tropics 118 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO 6-lina AGRICULTUTZ4U. ionof SERNES cultivated plans in tetropics Edited by David W. Roubik Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Balboa, Panama Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations F'Ø Rome, 1995 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-11 ISBN 92-5-103659-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. FAO 1995 PlELi. uion are ted PlauAr David W. Roubilli (edita Footli-anal ISgt-iieulture Organization of the Untled Nations Contributors Marco Accorti Makhdzir Mardan Istituto Sperimentale per la Zoologia Agraria Universiti Pertanian Malaysia Cascine del Ricci° Malaysian Bee Research Development Team 50125 Firenze, Italy 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Stephen L. Buchmann John K. S. Mbaya United States Department of Agriculture National Beekeeping Station Carl Hayden Bee Research Center P.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Corethrellidae) Author(S): Priyanka De Silva and Ximena E
    First Report of the Mating Behavior of a Species of Frog-Biting Midge (Diptera: Corethrellidae) Author(s): Priyanka De Silva and Ximena E. Bernal Source: Florida Entomologist, 96(4):1522-1529. 2013. Published By: Florida Entomological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0434 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1653/024.096.0434 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. 1522 Florida Entomologist 96(4) December 2013 FIRST REPORT OF THE MATING BEHAVIOR OF A SPECIES OF FROG-BITING MIDGE (DIPTERA: CORETHRELLIDAE) PRIYANKA DE SILVA1,* AND XIMENA E. BERNAL1, 2 1Department of Biological Science, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 43131, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA 2Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Swarming is a common mating behavior present throughout Diptera and, in particular, in species of lower flies (Nematocerous Diptera).
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Behavior and Venom System Morphology in Understanding Its Ecology and Evolution
    Toxins 2019, 11, 666; doi:10.3390/toxins11110666 S1 of S11 Supplementary Materials: The Diversity of Venom: The Importance of Behavior and Venom System Morphology in Understanding Its Ecology and Evolution Vanessa Schendel, Lachlan D. Rash, Ronald A. Jenner, and Eivind A. B. Undheim Table S1. Independently evolved venomous animal lineages and the primary ecological roles of their venoms. Taxa for which no direct support of their venomous nature could be found are shown in grey font. General Venom System Animal Group Venomous Lineage Primary Role References Morphology Predation, defense, Cnidarians All Nematocysts [1] intraspecific competition Coleoid Posterior and anterior glands, cephalopods, venom injected through salivary Predation [2,3] including octopus papilla. and squid Long duct/venom gland, venom Cone snails and injected through hollow radular Predation, [4] relatives (Conoidea) tooth on proboscis by a distal defense venom pump. Tritons, helmet Two-lobed salivary (venom) Molluscs shells, etc. glands that open through Predation [5] (Tonnoidea) common duct into buccal mass. Dwarf tritons, Single-lobed salivary (venom) including vampire glands that open through Predation [6] snails common duct into buccal mass. (Colubrariidae) Primary and accessory salivary Murex snails (venom) glands that open Predation [7] (Muricidae) through common duct into buccal mass. Proboscis with venom secreting cells, sometimes with stylet to Nemerteans Ribbon worms facilitate venom delivery Predation [8] (Enopla), or pseudocnidae with a potential role in venom delivery. Toxin-producing “lappets” secreting venom into large Blood worms muscular and glandular venom Predation [9] (Glyceridae) reservoir, which is presumably Annelids also involved in venom expulsion. Secretory cells dispersed along Predation, Leeches (Hirudinea) the buccal cavity in jawed [10–12] blood feeding leeches (Arhynchobdellida); Toxins 2019, 11, 666; doi:10.3390/toxins11110666 S2 of S11 presence of two paired salivary glands in jawless leeches (Glossiphoniidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Preferences and Localization Performance of Blood-Sucking Flies
    Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published June 6, 2006 Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arl003 Acoustic preferences and localization performance of blood-sucking flies (Corethrella Coquillett) to tu´ngara frog calls Ximena E. Bernal,a A. Stanley Rand,b and Michael J. Ryana,b aSection of Integrative Biology C0930, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-0253, USA and bSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 2072, Balboa, Panama Mating signals that increase attractiveness of males to females can also increase conspicuousness of the signaler to predators and parasites. We investigated the acoustic preference of species of blood-sucking flies of the genus Corethrella (Diptera: Corethrelli- dae), which eavesdrop on the sexual advertisement signals of tu´ngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus). Male frogs of this species facultatively produce 2 types of mating calls: simple (whines alone) and complex (whines and chucks). We tested the acoustic preference of the flies and their ability to locate their host when the frogs produce simple or complex calls. The flies exhibited phonotaxis to both types of calls but were preferentially attracted to complex calls. We show that acoustic information alone is sufficient for the flies’ accurate localization of calling frogs. Complex calls, however, were not approached at closer distance or with decreased landing error (i.e., proportion of landings outside the target) than simple calls, suggesting that call structure does not influence localization performance. Female tu´ngara frogs and frog-eating bats (Trachops cirrhosus) also prefer com- plex to simple tu´ngara frog calls. Thus, intended and unintended receivers with different ear morphologies exhibit the same preference for a specific tu´ngara frog call type.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the Control of Salvinia
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Introduction and Establishment of Cyrtobagous salviniae Calder and Sands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the Control of Salvinia minima Baker (Salviniaceae), and Interspecies Interactions Possibly Limiting Successful Control in Louisiana Katherine A. Parys Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Parys, Katherine A., "Introduction and Establishment of Cyrtobagous salviniae Calder and Sands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the Control of Salvinia minima Baker (Salviniaceae), and Interspecies Interactions Possibly Limiting Successful Control in Louisiana" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1565. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1565 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. INTRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CYRTOBAGOUS SALVINIAE CALDER AND SANDS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) FOR THE CONTROL OF SALVINIA MINIMA BAKER (SALVINIACEAE), AND INTERSPECIES INTERACTIONS POSSIBLY LIMITING SUCCESSFUL CONTROL IN LOUISIANA. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology By Katherine A. Parys B.A., University of Rhode Island, 2002 M.S., Clarion University of Pennsylvania, 2004 December 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In pursing this Ph.D. I owe many thanks to many people who have supported me throughout this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Herefore of the Emphasis of the Entomology Division Is on Crop Pests, Most the Insects in the Museum Belong to This Particular Category
    Odonatologica 4 (2): 89-93 June I, 1975 SHORT COMMUNICATION A note on the odonatecollectionin the Entomology Division of the Departmentof Agriculture, Nepal K.C. Sharma EntomologyDivision, Department of Agriculture, Kumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal Received and Accepted February 19, 1975 A brief outline is given of the aims ofthe Nepalese Museum of Entomolo- with annotated list of 11 odonate harboured in its gy, Lalitpur, an species collections. Among these, Nannophyapygmaea Ramb. is new to the Nepalese fauna, while Rhinocypha bifasciata Sel, had been recorded only once pre- of the viously from the Nepalese territory. A bibliography papers on Nepalese odonate fauna, published after World War II, is added. INTRODUCTION In view of the ever increasing interest of odonatologists in the faunaof Nepal and the Himalayan region, we have gladly accepted the invitation by the Editor of Odonatologica to prepare a brief note on the odonate collection harboured in the below lines will induce the our institution. The author sincerely hopes that to also to Museum. He is that odonatologists visiting Nepal pay a visit our sure contacts established in this way will be greatly profitable for the advancement of Nepalese entomology. For the sake of convenience we have considered useful to append a biblio- graphy of papers on Nepalese Odonatathat have appeared after World War II. 89 THE INSECT MUSEUM OF THE ENTOMOLOGY DIVISION Ever since the inception of the Entomology Division in 1955, in the frame- work of the Department of Agriculture of H.M.G. of Nepal, reference collections of insects are being steadily brought together. However, the Insect Museum got its special identity within the Division only in 1963, with the attachment of a taxonomist to its staff.
    [Show full text]