DOCSLIB.ORG

The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle. All photographs by Luis Mata unless otherwise stated. These Creative-Commons licensed photos are available at https://www.flickr.com/photos/dingilingi/. The final version of this report was finished the 20 of November 2015. Please cite as: The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? (2015) Mata L, Ives CD, Garrard GE, Gordon A, Backstrom A, Cranney K, Smith TR, Stark L, Bickel DJ, Cunningham S, Hahs AK, Hochuli D, Malipatil M, Moir ML, Plein M, Porch N, Semeraro L, Standish R, Walker K, Vesk PA, Parris K, Bekessy SA. Report prepared for the City of Melbourne. Contributors Anna Backstrom Interdisciplinary Conservation Kate Cranney Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group, Centre for Urban Science Research Group, Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. [email protected] [email protected] Sarah A. Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Saul Cunningham CSIRO, Box 1700, Canberra, Science Research Group, Centre for Urban ACT 2601, Australia Research, School of Global, Urban and Social [email protected] Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Georgia E. Garrard Interdisciplinary Conservation Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. Science Research Group, Centre for Urban [email protected] Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Daniel J. Bickel Entomology, Australian Museum Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010 Australia. Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. [email protected] [email protected] Ascelin Gordon Interdisciplinary Conservation Mallik Malipatil Department of Economic Science Research Group, Centre for Urban Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Research, School of Global, Urban and Social AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, 5 Ring Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Road, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. Australia. [email protected] [email protected] Amy K. Hahs Australian Research Centre Luis Mata Interdisciplinary Conservation Science for Urban Ecology (ARCUE), Royal Botanic Research Group, Centre for Urban Research, Gardens Victoria, c/o School of BioSciences, The School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010. University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne 3000, [email protected] Victoria, Australia. Dieter Hochuli School of Biological Sciences, [email protected] The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Melinda L Moir School of Plant Biology, Australia. University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, [email protected] Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia Christopher D. Ives Faculty of Sustainability, [email protected] Leuphana University Lüneburg, Scharnhorststraße Kirsten Parris School of Ecosystem and Forest 1, Lüneburg 21335, Germany. Sciences, The University of Melbourne Burnley [email protected] Campus, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia. [email protected] Michaela Plein Centre of Excellence for Rachel Standish School of Veterinary and Life Environmental Decisions, School of BioSciences, Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. Australia. [email protected] [email protected] Laura Stark Interdisciplinary Conservation Nick Porch School of Life and Environmental Science Research Group, Centre for Urban Sciences, Melbourne Burwood Campus, Deakin Research, School of Global, Urban and Social University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, 3125, Victoria, Australia. Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. [email protected] [email protected] Linda Semeraro Department of Economic Peter A. Vesk School of BioSciences, University of Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia. Biosciences Research Division, 5 Ring Road, La [email protected] Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia. Ken Walker Science Department, Museum [email protected] Victoria, 11 Nicholson St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Tessa R. Smith Interdisciplinary Conservation Australia. Science Research Group, Centre for Urban [email protected] Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia. [email protected] Acknowledgements The Little Things that Run the City has been a truly collaborative project. First and foremost, we are grateful to the City of Melbourne for co-funding this project, and for their ongoing support and enthusiasm. We’d especially like to thank Ian Shears, Yvonne Lynch and Lingna Zhang from the Urban Ecology and Urban Forest Team. We are looking forward to continue working with you. We would also like to acknowledge the support of funding from RMIT University’s Strategic Projects in Urban Research (SPUR) Fund, the National Environmental Scientific Programme - Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub (NESP - CAUL) and the Australian Research Council - Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED). Thank you to the volunteer field assistants–namely Estíbaliz Palma, Michelle Freeman, David Duncan and Xavier Francoeur–who kindly join us in our search for insects. We are grateful to Jeff Shimeta, David Heathcote and Shannon Fernandes from RMIT University’s Applied Sciences Lab for providing the laboratory workspace and equipment necessary to undertake the insect sorting and identification phase of this project. A sincere thank you to Alan Andersen and Timothy New for generously providing help with species identification and advice on species biology and ecology. We are grateful to the many enthusiastic volunteers who identified insect species from photographs uploaded to BowerBird, the Museum Victoria’s citizen science website. Particular thanks to Ethan Beaver, Matt Campbell, Darren Carmen, Graeme Cocks, Tony Daley, Ken Harris, Daniel Heald, Martin Lagerwey, Leuba Ridgeway and Stephen Thorpe for their assistance. The Museum Victoria and the Entomological Society of Victoria contributed to the success of the 2014 Melbourne BioBlitz. Special thanks to Patrick Honan, who help us conduct the BioBlitz light trapping surveys. We’d also like to thank Chris Cole and Peter Symes from the Melbourne Royal Botanical Gardens (RBG), for their support and on-ground assistance while undertaking fieldwork in the gardens. A sincere thank you to artist Linda Tegg, for allowing us to conduct insect surveys of your ‘Grasslands’ art installation at the State Library of Victoria (SLV). Thanks to John Delpratt, horticulturist from the University of Melbourne, and Linda Wheeler from the SLV, for facilitating our involvement. Finally, thank you Matthew Selinske from RMIT University’s Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group for proofing the final version of this report. Contents 1 The little frequently asked questions, 1 2 The little things that run the city, 5 3 Insect biodiversity of the City of Melbourne, 15 4 Urban green space sites, 37 5 Habitat types, 53 6 Insect orders, 67 7 Ecological interactions, 89 8 Ecological processes and ecosystem services, 99 9 Recommendations for management and practice, 105 References, 109 Appendix 1 Species data, 119 Appendix 2 Methodological approach, 183 Chapter 1 The little frequently asked questions
Recommended publications
  • DNA Barcoding of the Fire Ant Genus Solenopsis Westwood

    DNA Barcoding of the Fire Ant Genus Solenopsis Westwood

    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27 (2020) 184–188 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com Original article DNA barcoding of the fire ant genus Solenopsis Westwood (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Riyadh region, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ⇑ Khawaja Ghulam Rasool a, , Mureed Husain a, Shehzad Salman a, Muhammad Tufail a,b, Sukirno Sukirno c, Abdulrahman S. Aldawood a a Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia b Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan c Entomology Laboratory, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia article info abstract Article history: The ant genus Solenopsis Westwood, 1840 is the largest in Myrmicinae subfamily having almost 200 Received 29 April 2019 described species worldwide. They are commonly distributed in the tropics and temperate areas of the Revised 18 June 2019 world. Some invasive Solenopsis species are very dreadful. We have already reported a fire ant species, Accepted 30 June 2019 Solenopsis saudiensis Sharaf & Aldawood, 2011, identified using traditional morphometric approaches of Available online 2 July 2019 species identification. Present study was carried out to develop DNA Barcoding to identify Solenopsis sau- diensis and to elucidate genetic structure of the various S. saudiensis populations across their distribution Keywords: range in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The comparison of DNA barcodes showed no genetic diversity among six Fire ant populations and a queen from S. saudiensis analyzed from the Riyadh region. This genetic resemblance DNA barcoding Cytochrome C oxidase I probably reflects their adaptation toward a specific habitat, thus constituting a single and strong gene Biodiversity pool.
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory

    Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • East Gippsland, Victoria

    East Gippsland, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera

    Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera

    EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution.
  • Phragmites Australis

    Phragmites Australis

    Journal of Ecology 2017, 105, 1123–1162 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12797 BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No. 283 List Vasc. PI. Br. Isles (1992) no. 153, 64,1 Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis Jasmin G. Packer†,1,2,3, Laura A. Meyerson4, Hana Skalov a5, Petr Pysek 5,6,7 and Christoph Kueffer3,7 1Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 3Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092, Zurich,€ Switzerland; 4University of Rhode Island, Natural Resources Science, Kingston, RI 02881, USA; 5Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-25243, Pruhonice, Czech Republic; 6Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic; and 7Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa Summary 1. This account presents comprehensive information on the biology of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (P. communis Trin.; common reed) that is relevant to understanding its ecological char- acteristics and behaviour. The main topics are presented within the standard framework of the Biologi- cal Flora of the British Isles: distribution, habitat, communities, responses to biotic factors and to the abiotic environment, plant structure and physiology, phenology, floral and seed characters, herbivores and diseases, as well as history including invasive spread in other regions, and conservation. 2. Phragmites australis is a cosmopolitan species native to the British flora and widespread in lowland habitats throughout, from the Shetland archipelago to southern England.
  • Temporal Lags and Overlap in the Diversification of Weevils and Flowering Plants

    Temporal Lags and Overlap in the Diversification of Weevils and Flowering Plants

    Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants Duane D. McKennaa,1, Andrea S. Sequeirab, Adriana E. Marvaldic, and Brian D. Farrella aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481; and cInstituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Aridas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Te´cnicas, C.C. 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved March 3, 2009 (received for review October 22, 2008) The extraordinary diversity of herbivorous beetles is usually at- tributed to coevolution with angiosperms. However, the degree and nature of contemporaneity in beetle and angiosperm diversi- fication remain unclear. Here we present a large-scale molecular phylogeny for weevils (herbivorous beetles in the superfamily Curculionoidea), one of the most diverse lineages of insects, based on Ϸ8 kilobases of DNA sequence data from a worldwide sample including all families and subfamilies. Estimated divergence times derived from the combined molecular and fossil data indicate diversification into most families occurred on gymnosperms in the Jurassic, beginning Ϸ166 Ma. Subsequent colonization of early crown-group angiosperms occurred during the Early Cretaceous, but this alone evidently did not lead to an immediate and ma- jor diversification event in weevils. Comparative trends in weevil diversification and angiosperm dominance reveal that massive EVOLUTION diversification began in the mid-Cretaceous (ca. 112.0 to 93.5 Ma), when angiosperms first rose to widespread floristic dominance. These and other evidence suggest a deep and complex history of coevolution between weevils and angiosperms, including codiver- sification, resource tracking, and sequential evolution.
  • Monmouthshire Moth & Butterfly Group

    Monmouthshire Moth & Butterfly Group

    MONMOUTHSHIRE MOTH & BUTTERFLY GROUP NEWSLETTER No 86 August 2012. A monthly newsletter covering Gwent and Monmouthshire Vice County 35 Editor: Martin Anthoney Small Ranunculus (Hecatera dysodea ) Update Up to 1900 this small, pretty moth used to be common in Britain, mainly in eastern and southern counties. It then suffered a catastrophic decline, and by 1912 it had disappeared from most of its range. The last record was 1941 and it was assumed to be extinct in Britain. The Small Ranunculus reappeared in Britain on 26th June 1997 in Kent. In 1998 it was recorded in areas around the Thames Estuary which was formerly one of its strongholds, and on 14th July 1999 Roger James caught one in his light trap at Newport, well away from its former range. The next six years produced eleven further adult specimens to light in Roger’s garden, and in 2003 Kevin Dupé and Roger confirmed breeding when eggs and larvae were found on prickly lettuce at the Blaina Wharf site alongside the River Usk. Since then, records have been made from many sites along the Usk corridor in Newport and out as far as St Mellons in the west and Goldcliff in the east. In August 2012, Kevin Dupé found larvae in the Crindau area of Newport and also close to the footbridge over the River Usk near Rodney Parade. On 28th August, Roger James and I were recording butterflies when we found 20 Small Ranunculus larvae adjacent to Caldicot Railway Station and the following day a further one at Chepstow (Newhouse Farm Industrial Estate), next to the first Severn bridge.
  • Etymology of the Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) Named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S

    Etymology of the Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) Named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online Etymology of the Dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. IAN D. ENDERSBY 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Vic 3094 ([email protected]) Published on 23 April 2012 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN Endersby, I.D. (2012). Etymology of the dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 134, 1-16. R.J. Tillyard described 26 genera and 130 specifi c or subspecifi c taxa of dragonfl ies from the Australasian region. The etymology of the scientifi c name of each of these is given or deduced. Manuscript received 11 December 2011, accepted for publication 16 April 2012. KEYWORDS: Australasia, Dragonfl ies, Etymology, Odonata, Tillyard. INTRODUCTION moved to another genus while 16 (12%) have fallen into junior synonymy. Twelve (9%) of his subspecies Given a few taxonomic and distributional have been raised to full species status and two species uncertainties, the odonate fauna of Australia comprises have been relegated to subspecifi c status. Of the 325 species in 113 genera (Theischinger and Endersby eleven subspecies, or varieties or races as Tillyard 2009). The discovery and naming of these dragonfl ies sometimes called them, not accounted for above, fi ve falls roughly into three discrete time periods (Table 1). are still recognised, albeit four in different genera, During the fi rst of these, all Australian Odonata were two are no longer considered as distinct subspecies, referred to European experts, while the second era and four have disappeared from the modern literature.

  • Home Pre-Fire Moth Species List by Species

    Species present before fire - by species Scientific Name Common Name Family Abantiades aphenges Hepialidae Abantiades hyalinatus Mustard Ghost Moth Hepialidae Abantiades labyrinthicus Hepialidae Acanthodela erythrosema Oecophoridae Acantholena siccella Oecophoridae Acatapaustus leucospila Nolidae Achyra affinitalis Cotton Web Spinner Crambidae Aeolochroma mniaria Geometridae Ageletha hemiteles Oecophoridae Aglaosoma variegata Notodontidae Agriophara discobola Depressariidae Agrotis munda Brown Cutworm Noctuidae Alapadna pauropis Erebidae Alophosoma emmelopis Erebidae Amata nigriceps Erebidae Amelora demistis Pointed Cape Moth Geometridae Amelora sp. Cape Moths Geometridae Antasia flavicapitata Geometridae Anthela acuta Common Anthelid Moth Anthelidae Anthela ferruginosa Anthelidae Anthela repleta Anthelidae Anthela sp. Anthelidae Anthela varia Variable Anthelid Anthelidae Antipterna sp. Oecophoridae Ardozyga mesochra Gelechiidae Ardozyga sp. Gelechiidae Ardozyga xuthias Gelechiidae Arhodia lasiocamparia Pink Arhodia Geometridae Arrade destituta Erebidae Arrade leucocosmalis Erebidae Asthenoptycha iriodes Tortricidae Asura lydia Erebidae Azelina biplaga Geometridae Barea codrella Oecophoridae Calathusa basicunea Nolidae Calathusa hypotherma Nolidae Capusa graodes Geometridae Capusa sp. Geometridae Carposina sp. Carposinidae Casbia farinalis Geometridae Casbia sp. Geometridae Casbia tanaoctena Geometridae Catacometes phanozona Oecophoridae Catoryctis subparallela Xyloryctidae Cernia amyclaria Geometridae Chaetolopha oxyntis Geometridae Chelepteryx
  • Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The

    Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The

    tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td h Idntt nd tt f Clptr n th ntrl nd dfd hbtt f nfld Alnd (4-8 GKhl . : rh At SI lnt rttn Mnt Albrt rh Cntr rvt Alnd lnd • SI lnt rttn prt • EW EAA EAME O SCIEIIC A IUSIA ESEAC 199 O Ο Ν Ε W Ε Ν ttr Grnt rd Τ Ε Ρ Ο Ι Ο Τ ie wi e suo o a oey Sciece eseac Ga om e ew eaa oey Gas oa is suo is gaeuy ackowege Ρ EW EAA SI ' EAME O lnt SCIEIIC A rttn IUSIA Wāhn ESEAC Mn p Makig Sciece Wok o ew eaa KUSCE G eees i a suua eiome a ew eaa case suy e ieiy a saus o Coeoea i e aua a moiie aias o yie Aucka (197-199 / G Kusce — Aucka SI 199 (SI a oecio eo ISS 11-1 ; o3 IS -77-59- I ie II Seies UC 5957(93111 © Cow Coyig uise y SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa eceme 199 ie y Geea iig Seices eso ew eaa Etiam pristina in aua Asο i a aua seig summa securitas et futura sweet tranquility and nature ., OISIECE e oe-eeig emoyci eee ioycus uuus (ou o is aie ooca os kaikaea (acycaus acyioies om e yie eee suey aea Aucka ew eaa e wie gaues o e eee ae oe cuses a ass ees is eee as a eic saus o uike a o e uaaa (Seoo as ossi eiece sows a e weei gou was iig i uassic imes way ack i e ea o e iosaus a gymosems moe a 1 miio yeas ago OEWO As a small boy in the 1930s I used to collect butterflies on the South Downs in southern England.
  • Fifty Million Years of Beetle Evolution Along the Antarctic Polar Front

    Fifty Million Years of Beetle Evolution Along the Antarctic Polar Front

    Fifty million years of beetle evolution along the Antarctic Polar Front Helena P. Bairda,1, Seunggwan Shinb,c,d, Rolf G. Oberprielere, Maurice Hulléf, Philippe Vernong, Katherine L. Moona, Richard H. Adamsh, Duane D. McKennab,c,2, and Steven L. Chowni,2 aSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; dSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea; eAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; fInstitut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes, Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement, Université de Rennes, 35653 Le Rheu, France; gUniversité de Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Station Biologique, 35380 Paimpont, France; hDepartment of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431; and iSecuring Antarctica’s Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia Edited by Nils Chr. Stenseth, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and approved May 6, 2021 (received for review August 24, 2020) Global cooling and glacial–interglacial cycles since Antarctica’s iso- The hypothesis that diversification has proceeded similarly in lation have been responsible for the diversification of the region’s Antarctic marine and terrestrial groups has not been tested. While marine fauna. By contrast, these same Earth system processes are the extinction of a diverse continental Antarctic biota is well thought to have played little role terrestrially, other than driving established (13), mounting evidence of significant and biogeo- widespread extinctions.
  • Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Catalogue

    Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Catalogue

    INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF LANDCARE RESEARCH Dr D.R. Penman Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS INSTITUTIONS Dr J.F. Lawrence CSIRO Division of Entomology G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City A.C.T. 2601, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 43 Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a PRESS Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2001 4 Larochelle & Larivière (2001): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) catalogue Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2001 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication LAROCHELLE, André, 1940– Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue / A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z.