DOCSLIB.ORG

NGO Monitor's Submission to the Office Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NGO Monitor's Submission to the Office Of I Ben-Maimon Blvd. Jerusalem, Israel 92262 liÄiiiÄi Phone:+972-2-S66-1020 Fax:+972-77-511-7030 [email protected] Making NGOs Accountable www.ngo-monltor.org VIA IIAND DELIVERY AND E-MAIL ADVISORY BOARD: His Excellency Luis Moreno-Ocampo Prosecutor, International Criminal Court Elliott Abrams Post Office Box 19519 Amb. YehudaAvner 2500CM The Hague Prof. Alan Dershowitz The Netherlands Tom Gross Col. Richard Kemp CBE October 20, 2010 Douglas Murray Hon. Fiamma Nirenstein Dr. Judea Pearl RE: The Palestinian Declaration and ICC Jurisdiction Judge Abraham Sofaer Elie Wiesel Prof. Ruth Wisse Dear Mr. Moreno-Ocampo: R. James Woolsey Attached please find a copy of NGO Monitor's Submission to the Office of PRESIDENT: the Prosecutor (OTP) regarding the January 21, 2009, declaration of the Palestinian National Authority purporting to accept the jurisdiction of the ICC. Prof. Gerald Steinberg I NGO Monitor has prepared this statement to address several aspects of the legal arguments raised by several of the submissions to the Court as well as to provide backgroimd information and context that may not be known to the OTP. We hope that this information will aid you in assessing the legality of the PNA declaration. i NGO Monitor also grants permission to the OTP to post its submission on the ICC website. Respectfiilly submitted. le Herzberg Legal Advisor, N( lonitor The Amutah for NGO Responsibility R.A. (-|"y) # 580465508 I Ben-Malmon ßivtf, Jerusalem, Israel 92262 Phone:+972-2-566-1020 if^HIÜiÏTCDtR Fax:+972-77-5 M-7030 Making NGOs Accountable n.,[email protected] *» www.ngo-monitor.orj NGO Monitor Submission to the International Criminal Court Office of the Prosecutor Regarding the "Situation in Palestine" October 20, 2010 Summary of the Argument I. The Palestinian National Authority is not a State. It does not have the competence to accede to the Rome Statute. II. The Position Known as the "Teleological Approach" is Nothing More than a Thinly Veiled Attempt to Change the Explicit Wording of the Rome Statute, Transforming the ICC into a Court of Universal Jurisdiction. Universal Jurisdiction for the ICC was Expressly Rejected by the Drafters of the Statute. A. The "object and purpose" of the Rome Statute do not support a "teleological" interpretation of "Statehood". 1. The Treaty codified a system of complementarity with national courts. The ICC was never intended to supplant national jurisdiction. 2. Article 15 does not allow the Prosecutor to open cases that do not fall within the jurisdictional pre-conditions specified in Article 12. 3. The drafters of the Rome Statute explicitly rejected universal jurisdicfion. III. Claims of a "Zone of Impunity" in this Case are False, Misleading, and Highly Offensive. A. The Rome Statute and the UN Charter Provide Clear Mechanisms to Prevent Impunity B. Israel is Committed to the Rule of Law. Submissions Alleging a "Zone of Impunity" in Israel are False, Misleading, and Highly Offensive 1. Israel is a "social and democratic state with rule of law." 2; .Courts around the world have repeatedly and soundly rejected the claims of Al Haq and PCHR, impugning the Israeli legal system. 3. Israel is currently conducting investigations as to whether violations of intemational law took place during the Gaza War. 4. A negotiated settlement between the pai-ties will provide additional remedies for those who may have suffered wrong-doing. IV. The PNA and its Supporters Have "Unclean Hands". The Court should not Allow Itself to be Exploited by Those Who Brazenly Flout its Authority. A. The PNA and its State supporters in the Arab League are Marred by "Unclean Hands." As a Result, the PNA Declaration Must be Immediately Rejected. 1. The PNA and the members of the Arab League are some of the foremost perpetrators of intemational crimes and have repeatedly and openly challenged the authority of the Court with regards to the case against Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir. 2. In its declaration, the PNA represented that it would "cooperate with the Court without delay or exception" pursuant to Part 9 of the Rome Statute. It has not kept its promise. B. Several NGO supporters of the PNA declaration are also marred by "unclean hands". v. The PNA Declaration and its support by NGOs is Part of the "Durban Strategy" or "War by Other Means." "We must... take a decisive stance of solidarity alongside fraternal Sudan and President Omar al-Bashir." —Remarks of Mahmoud Abbas, President of the PNA, to fellow attendee, Omar al-Bashir, at the March 30, 2009, Arab League Summit in-Doha, less than one month after the ICC issued a warrant for Bashir's arrest, and only two months after the PNA purported to accept the jurisdicfion of the ICC The remarks quoted above of Palestinian National Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas, are indicative of something very wrong in today's intemational system. Intemational institutions and universal human rights have been hijacked and exploited by their worst abusers in order to carry out a cynical political campaign. This campaign is not about ending "impunity for the most serious of intemational crimes" or fostering "justice" but rather aimed at exploiting international legal institutions in order to achieve what has yet to be accomplished on the battlefield or at the negotiating table. These tactics have been endemic at the UN Human Rights Council and the General Assembly for many years, and now, those advancing this campaign have targeted the ICC, seeking to subvert this Court and the Office of the Prosecutor in furtherance of this agenda. In the wake of the Palesfinian National Authority's (PNA) January 21, 2009, declaration purporting to accept jurisdiction of the ICC under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, and the numerous submissions made by academics and NGOs in furtherance of the PNA position, NGO Monitor has prepared this submission, addressing several aspects of the legal arguments raised as well as to provide background information and context that may not be known to the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP). We hope that this information will aid the OTP in assessing the legality of the PNA declaration. NGO Monitor is a Jerusalem-based research institution that tracks the activities and campaigns as well as the funding of NGOs operating in the Arab-Israeli conflict. For more than eight years, NGO Monitor has conducted dozens of detailed and systematic research studies on the issues of NGO transparency, accountability, intemational law, human rights, humanitarian aid, and the laws of armed conflict. Members of NGO Monitor's Advisory Board include Elie Wiesel; Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz; Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan; R. James Woolsey, former US Director of Central Intelligence; Member of Italian Parliament, Fiamma Nirenstein; US Jurist and former Legal Advisor to the State Department, Abraham Sofaer; Ambassador Yehuda Avner; UCLA Professor and President of the Daniel Pearl Foundafion, Judea Pearl; Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse, former US government official, Elliot Abrams; Douglas Murray, Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, best-selling author and commentator; and British journalist and international affairs commentator, Tom Gross. After assessing the Rome Statute, the PNA declaration, and the submissions to the OTP, NGO Monitor concludes that 1) because the PNA is not a State, it does not have the competence to accede to the Rome Statute; 2) the "tcleological" approach is merely an attempt to transform this Court into one of universal jurisdiction; 3) claims of a "lack of recourse" or "impunity" in this case are overstated and misleading; 4) the PNA and its supporters openly defy the authority of the Court and its objectives; and 5) the PNA declaration is a part of the "Durban Strategy" - a political campaign that uses the rhetoric of human rights and intemational law in order to attack the Icgidmacy of the State of Israel. The Court should not allow itself to be exploited for these political ends. Therefore, the OTP should reject the PNA's declaration forthwith. I. The Palestinian National Authority is not a State. It does not have the competence to accede to the Rome Statute. The Palestinian National Authority has purported to accept the jurisdiction of the ICC based on Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute. The Statute is clear, however, that the Court only has jurisdiction over States. As the PNA is not a State, it cannot accede to the Rome Statute. One of the cornerstones of international law and a jus cogens norm is pacta sunt servanda ("agreements must be kept").' According to law professor Mark Janis, "probably no rule better fits the definition of a norm oïjus cogens than pacta stmt servanda ... a norm that sets the very foundations of the intemational legal system."^ This principle was restated in Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: "Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith." The principle oi pacta sunt servanda also requires that treafies "should prima facie be enforced according to their terms.""* Art. 31(4) of the Vienna Convention affirms that special meaning should only be given to a term "if it is established that the parties so intended." The International Court of Justice reiterates that "to adopt an interpretation which [runs] counter to the clear meaning of the terms would not be to interpret but to revise the treaty."^ Furthermore, "the principles of interpretation [of the Vienna Convention] neither require nor condone the imputation into a treaty of words that are not there or the importation into a treaty of concepts that were not intended."^ Based on these principles, "the very genesis of the [ICC] in a multilateral treaty should generate reluctance to stray from the clear precepts adopted by states after years of diplomafic effort."' The language of the Rome Statute was carefully crafted after much deliberation and compromise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Documents to the Amicus Brief Submitted to the Jerusalem District Court
    בבית המשפט המחוזי בירושלים עת"מ 36759-05-18 בשבתו כבית משפט לעניינים מנהליים בעניין שבין: 1( ארגון Human Rights Watch 2( עומר שאקר העותרים באמצעות עו"ד מיכאל ספרד ו/או אמילי שפר עומר-מן ו/או סופיה ברודסקי מרח' דוד חכמי 12, תל אביב 6777812 טל: 03-6206947/8/9, פקס 03-6206950 - נ ג ד - שר הפנים המשיב באמצעות ב"כ, מפרקליטות מחוז ירושלים, רחוב מח"ל 7, מעלות דפנה, ירושלים ת.ד. 49333 ירושלים 9149301 טל: 02-5419555, פקס: 026468053 המכון לחקר ארגונים לא ממשלתיים )עמותה רשומה 58-0465508( ידיד בית המשפט באמצעות ב"כ עו"ד מוריס הירש מרח' יד חרוצים 10, ירושלים טל: 02-566-1020 פקס: 077-511-7030 השלמת מסמכים מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בהמשך לדיון שהתקיים ביום 11 במרץ 2019, ובהתאם להחלטת כב' בית המשפט, מתכבד ידיד בית המשפט להגיש את ריכוז הציוציו של העותר מס' 2 החל מיום 25 ליוני 2018 ועד ליום 10 למרץ 2019. כפי שניתן להבחין בנקל מהתמצית המצ"ב כנספח 1, בתקופה האמורה, אל אף טענתו שהינו "פעיל זכויות אדם", בפועל ציוציו )וציוציו מחדש Retweets( התמקדו בנושאים שבהם הביע תמיכה בתנועת החרם או ביקורת כלפי מדינת ישראל ומדיניותה, אך נמנע, כמעט לחלוטין, מלגנות פגיעות בזכיות אדם של אזרחי מדינת ישראל, ובכלל זה, גינוי כלשהו ביחס למעשי רצח של אזרחים ישראלים בידי רוצחים פלסטינים. באשר לטענתו של העותר מס' 2 שחשבון הטוויטר שלו הינו, בפועל, חשבון של העותר מס' 1, הרי שגם כאן ניתן להבין בנקל שטענה זו חסרת בסיס כלשהי. ראשית, החשבון מפנה לתפקידו הקודם בארגון CCR, אליו התייחסנו בחוות הדעת המקורית מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בסעיף 51.
    [Show full text]
  • ABUSING the LEGACY of the HOLOCAUST: the ROLE of Ngos in EXPLOITING HUMAN RIGHTS to DEMONIZE ISRAEL Gerald M
    ABUSING THE LEGACY OF THE HOLOCAUST: THE ROLE OF NGOs IN EXPLOITING HUMAN RIGHTS TO DEMONIZE ISRAEL Gerald M. Steinberg In the wake of the Holocaust, as human rights norms have come to the fore, NGOs have become major actors in international politics in general and in the Arab-Israeli conflict in particular. These organizations and their leaders form an extremely powerful “NGO community” that has propelled the anti-Israeli agenda in international frameworks such as the UN Human Rights Commission and the 2001 UN Conference against Racism in Durban. Through their reports, press releases, and influence among academics and diplomats, these NGOs propagated false charges of “massacre” during the Israeli army’s antiterror operation in Jenin (Defensive Shield) and misrepresent Israel’s separation barrier as an “apartheid wall.” This community has exploited the “halo effect” of human rights rhetoric to promote highly particularistic goals. In most cases small groups of individuals, with substantial funds obtained from non- profit foundations and governments (particularly European), use the NGO frameworks to gain influence and pursue private political agendas, without being accountable to any system of checks and balances. Jewish Political Studies Review 16:3-4 (Fall 2004) 59 60 Gerald M. Steinberg This process has been most salient in the framework of the Arab-Israeli conflict. The ideology of anticolonialism (the precursor to today’s antiglobalization) and political correctness is dominant in the NGO community. This ideology accepted the post-1967 pro-Palestinian narrative and images of victimization, while labeling Israel as a neocolo- nialist aggressor. Thus, behind the human rights rhetoric, these NGOs are at the forefront of demonizing Israel and of the new anti-Semitism that seeks to deny the Jewish people sovereign equality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes
    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • From Secular Democracy to Hindu Rashtra Gita Sahgal*
    Feminist Dissent Hindutva Past and Present: From Secular Democracy to Hindu Rashtra Gita Sahgal* *Correspondence: secularspaces@ gmail.com Abstract This essay outlines the beginnings of Hindutva, a political movement aimed at establishing rule by the Hindu majority. It describes the origin myths of Aryan supremacy that Hindutva has developed, alongside the campaign to build a temple on the supposed birthplace of Ram, as well as the re-writing of history. These characteristics suggest that it is a far-right fundamentalist movement, in accordance with the definition of fundamentalism proposed by Feminist Dissent. Finally, it outlines Hindutva’s ‘re-imagining’ of Peer review: This article secularism and its violent campaigns against those it labels as ‘outsiders’ has been subject to a double blind peer review to its constructed imaginary of India. process Keywords: Hindutva, fundamentalism, secularism © Copyright: The Hindutva, the fundamentalist political movement of Hinduism, is also a Authors. This article is issued under the terms of foundational movement of the 20th century far right. Unlike its European the Creative Commons Attribution Non- contemporaries in Italy, Spain and Germany, which emerged in the post- Commercial Share Alike License, which permits first World War period and rapidly ascended to power, Hindutva struggled use and redistribution of the work provided that to gain mass acceptance and was held off by mass democratic movements. the original author and source are credited, the The anti-colonial struggle as well as Left, rationalist and feminist work is not used for commercial purposes and movements recognised its dangers and mobilised against it. Their support that any derivative works for anti-fascism abroad and their struggles against British imperialism and are made available under the same license terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Response to Terrorism
    Effective solidarity among states has become a prerequisite for ultimately succeeding in the war of the West against jihadist terrorism. A cohesive military strategy is needed for the West, the Arab states that are threatened, and Israel. It stands to reason that, just as all three face similar threats, the JERUSALEM models developed in Israel for dealing with terror merit attention in Europe and beyond. BERLIN Amb. Dore Gold President, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FROM LESSONS LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FIAMMA NIRENSTEIN (ED.) AMB. DORE GOLD | BRIG.-GEN. (RES.) YOSSI KUPERWASSER AMB. ALAN BAKER | PROF. ASA KASHER | AMB. FREDDY EYTAN Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs DR. IRWIN MANSDORF | DAN DIKER | JENNIFER ROSKIES Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM Fiamma Nirenstein (ed.) Amb. Dore Gold | Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser Amb. Alan Baker | Prof. Asa Kasher | Amb. Freddy Eytan Dr. Irwin Mansdorf | Dan Diker | Jennifer Roskies Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Read this book online: http://jcpa.org/lessons-israels-response-terrorism/ Cover photo: AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner, AP Photo/Michael Kappeler © 2017 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai St., Jerusalem, 92107 Israel Email: [email protected] Tel: 972-2-561-9281 | Fax: 972-2-561-9112 Jerusalem Center Websites: www.jcpa.org (English) | www.jcpa.org.il (Hebrew) www.jcpa-lecape.org (French) | www.jer-zentrum.org (German) www.dailyalert.org The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. ISBN: 978-965-218-136-7 Contents Executive Summary 5 Is the Terror against Europe Different from the Terror against Israel? Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Israeli Attacks on Human Rights Organizations and Activists Palestinian Centre for Human Rights 2019 3
    2 Israeli Attacks on Human Rights Organizations and Activists Palestinian Centre for Human Rights 2019 3 Contents Introduction 8 Part I 11 Isolation of the Victim :Shrinking Space for NGOs in the oPt by the Israeli occupation 1. The belligerent occupation attempts to criminalize the victim: Smear 13 campaigns against human rights defenders 2 .Sanctions and the Restrictions on Freedom of Movement 29 3 .Attempts to Defund Human Rights Organizations 33 4 .Threatening human rights defenders 35 Part II 38 International Standards for Human Rights Defenders 1. International Conventions 39 2 .States ’Obligations towards Human Rights Defenders 44 Conclusion and Recommendations 46 4 Israeli Attacks on Human Rights Organizations and Activists Palestinian Centre for Human Rights 2019 5 Preface From the moment we took it upon ourselves to defend human rights and civilians in times of war, we were conscious to both the dignity in our mission and the dangers it bears on our lives and security as human rights defenders. Nonetheless, human dignity and advocating for the rights of victims were at the heart of our mission, our life goal and purpose. We were armed with the international law’s rules and mechanisms, which is the fruit of many peoples’ experiences and struggles to identify justice from injustice, in our mission to protect humans and their rights to live a dignified life. Decades passed and we fought via every legal route we had available tirelessly, without a single moment of hesitation in the face of the Israeli occupation’s restrictions and threats. As the occu- pation continued without rest to put hurdles in our path, and enjoyed the illusion of depriving us from the means and mechanisms to defend the defeated and oppressed, our will never waned and we were never persuaded to drift from the path we chose to tread, because it is our deep belief that we have no choice but to stand tall and defend, as Palestinian people, our existence, dignity and right to self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic
    Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic Krista Hegburg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERISTY 2013 © 2013 Krista Hegburg All rights reserved Abstract Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic Krista Hegburg Reparations are often theorized in the vein of juridical accountability: victims of historical injustices call states to account for their suffering; states, in a gesture that marks a restoration of the rule of law, acknowledge and repair these wrongs via financial compensation. But as reparations projects intersect with a consolidation of liberalism that, in the postsocialist Czech Republic, increasingly hinges on a politics of recognition, reparations concomitantly interpellate minority subjects as such, instantiating their precarious inclusion into the body po litic in a way that vexes the both the historical justice and contemporary recognition reparatory projects seek. This dissertation analyzes claims made by Czech Romani Holocaust survivors in reparations programs, the social work apparatus through which they pursued their claims, and the often contradictory demands of the complex legal structures that have governed eligibility for reparations since the immediate aftermath of the war, and argues for an ethnographic examination of the forms of discrepant reciprocity and commensuration that underpin, and often foreclose, attempts to account for the Holocaust in contemporary Europe. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 18 Recognitions Chapter 2 74 The Veracious Voice: Gypsiology, Historiography, and the Unknown Holocaust Chapter 3 121 Reparations Politics, Czech Style: Law, the Camp, Sovereignty Chapter 4 176 “The Law is Such as It Is” Conclusion 198 The Obligation to Receive Bibliography 202 Appendix I 221 i Acknowledgments I have acquired many debts over the course of researching and writing this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2017 Annual Report 2017 Had the Dubious Distinction Of
    . 2017 Annual Report 2017 had the dubious distinction of marking the 50th anniversary of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. After half a century, during which Israel’s policies have created profound changes that indicate long-term intentions, it is clear that this reality cannot be viewed as temporary. In 2017, B'Tselem continued to document and publicize human rights violations, while exposing the injustice, violence and dispossession at the very core of the occupation regime, challenging its legitimacy in Israel and abroad, and helping to expedite its end. 1 Table of Contents 2017 in Numbers 3 Executive Director's Note 5 Marking the 50th year of the Occupation 6 Photography Exhibit 6 Media Surrounding the 50th Anniversary 8 Reports Published in 2017 8 Getting Off Scot-Free 8 Made in Israel: Exploiting Palestinian Land for Treatment of Israeli Waste 9 Unprotected: Detention of Palestinian Teenagers in East Jerusalem 9 Fatalities 10 Trigger-Happy Responses to Clashes, Stone-throwing Incidents, Demonstrations or Evading Arrest 10 A Shoot-to-Kill Approach in Cases Defined as Assault 10 Security Forces Violence Against Palestinians 11 The Gaza Strip – A Decade of Siege 11 Separating Families 12 Gaza Executions 12 Prisoners and Detainees 13 Hunger Strike 13 Minor detainees 13 Communities Facing Demolitions and Displacement in Area C 14 Communities Under Imminent Threat of Transfer 14 An Increasingly Coercive Environment 15 Demolition Data 15 Demolitions in East Jerusalem 16 Batan al-Hawa -
    [Show full text]
  • 1521117400Saumyaumamod
    1 2 MODULE 2: ROLE OF NGOS IN PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS - CASE STUDIES OF SOME INTERNATIONAL NGOs Component I(A) - Personal Details: Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh Vice Chancellor, National Law University, Delhi Co-Principal Investigator Prof. (Dr.) G.S.Bajpai Registrar, National Law University, Delhi Paper Coordinator Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Tiwari Dean, School of Law, Rights and Constitutional Governance, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) Content Writer / Author Ms. Saumya Uma Assistant Professor, Maharashtra National Law University (MNLU) Mumbai Content Reviewer Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Tiwari Dean, School of Law, Rights and Constitutional Governance, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) Component I(B) - Description of Module: Subject Law Paper Criminal Justice and Human Rights Unit IV: Role of NGOs / Civil Society in Protecting Human Rights Module title Role of NGOs in Protecting Human Rights – Case Studies of Some International NGOs Module ID Learning Objectives • To understand the work of international NGOs • To familiarize with some prominent international NGOs and their strategies, approaches and activities on human rights • To comprehend the interface between international NGOs and the United Nations in protecting human rights Pre-requisites An overview of the work of human rights NGOs Key words INGOs, human rights, campaign, advocacy, development, ECOSOC status 3 1. INTRODUCTION NGOs play an increasingly significant role in upholding human rights, and in implementing human rights standards in the present context. An international NGO (INGO) has similar vision, mission and mandate as national and state level NGOs; however, their sphere of work cuts across geographical borders, as their work extends to many countries and country-specific human rights issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2009 Betraying Truth: Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, First Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Betraying Truth: Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting, 1 The ourJ nal for the Study of Antisemitism (JSA) 139 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. jsa1-2_cv_jsa1-2_cv 3/1/2010 3:41 PM Page 2 Volume 1 Issue #2 Volume JOURNAL for the STUDY of ANTISEMITISM JOURNAL for the STUDY of ANTISEMITISM of the STUDY for JOURNAL Volume 1 Issue #2 2009 2009 Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564792 28003_jsa_1-2 Sheet No. 3 Side A 03/01/2010 12:09:36 \\server05\productn\J\JSA\1-2\front102.txt unknown Seq: 5 26-FEB-10 9:19 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Number 2 Preface It Never Sleeps: A Note from the Editors ......................... 89 Antisemitic Incidents around the World: July-Dec. 2009, A Partial List .................................... 93 Articles Defeat, Rage, and Jew Hatred .............. Richard L. Rubenstein 95 Betraying Truth: Ethics Abuse in Middle East Reporting ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Pamela Murgia
    “TESIS” — 2018/8/31 — 9:22 — page i — #1 Hamas’ Statements A discourse analysis approach Pamela Murgia TESI DOCTORAL UPF / ANY 2018 DIRECTOR DE LA TESI Prof. Teun A. van Dijk (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Prof. Nicola Melis (Università degli Studi di Cagliari) Departament Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge “TESIS” — 2018/8/31 — 9:22 — page ii — #2 “TESIS” — 2018/8/31 — 9:22 — page iii — #3 Abstract Hamas, acronym for Islamic Resistance Movement, is a political movement that was founded in 1987 and has, since 2007, been in charge of the Gaza Strip. The movement was initially characterised by a language accentuated by tropes of po- litical Islam and, after the Oslo Accords, by a strong rejection of the institutions established by the Accords. Consequently, the movement refused to take part in the elections of the Palestinian Authority. The failure of the Accords in the early 2000s led the movement to take a turn, deciding to participate in the elec- tions. Hamas thus underwent a significant political development, that resulted in changes in rhetoric, ideological representations, and self-representation. The present work aims to study the movements ideological development and commu- nication strategies by the means of Discourse Analysis, with the analysis of the corpora of bayan¯ at¯ , the official statements issued by Hamas and published on their official website. Resumen Hamas, acrónimo de “Movimiento de Resistencia Islámica”, es un movimiento político que se fundó en 1987 y que desde 2007 controla la Franja de Gaza. El movimiento se caracterizó inicialmente por un lenguaje fuertemente marcado por los topoi del Islam político y, después de los Acuerdos de Oslo, por un rechazo radical de las instituciones resultado de los mismos Acuerdos.
    [Show full text]